All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Poky Laverne point release
@ 2010-12-20 19:10 Joshua Lock
  2011-01-10 18:13 ` Joshua Lock
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Joshua Lock @ 2010-12-20 19:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: poky

Hi all,

I've a branch on poky-contrib (josh/laverne) which fixes the Makefiles
in several recipes such that I can do builds of all our targets on
Fedora 14 with it's new, stricter, make version (3.82).

This makes me think it's time to start pulling together a Laverne point
release but we don't really have a handle on what these should include.

For the Green point release I cooked I just went through commits since
the release and did sniff testing, but I think we can do better.
Plus I started to do that for Laverne but there's been some almost 900
commits since then... 

So, to the point of this message, I'm looking for people to nominate
fixes for the Laverne branch. Even better if you share a git hash.

To start the ball rolling I'm going to suggest:
* Make 3.82 fixes
* Qemu script enhancements/fixes
* Bitbake fetcher fixes


And you? What fixes would you suggest?

Cheers,
Joshua
-- 
Joshua Lock
        Intel Open Source Technology Centre



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: Poky Laverne point release
  2010-12-20 19:10 Poky Laverne point release Joshua Lock
@ 2011-01-10 18:13 ` Joshua Lock
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Joshua Lock @ 2011-01-10 18:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: poky

On Mon, 2010-12-20 at 19:10 +0000, Joshua Lock wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> I've a branch on poky-contrib (josh/laverne) which fixes the Makefiles
> in several recipes such that I can do builds of all our targets on
> Fedora 14 with it's new, stricter, make version (3.82).
> 
> This makes me think it's time to start pulling together a Laverne point
> release but we don't really have a handle on what these should include.
> 
> For the Green point release I cooked I just went through commits since
> the release and did sniff testing, but I think we can do better.
> Plus I started to do that for Laverne but there's been some almost 900
> commits since then... 
> 
> So, to the point of this message, I'm looking for people to nominate
> fixes for the Laverne branch. Even better if you share a git hash.
> 
> To start the ball rolling I'm going to suggest:
> * Make 3.82 fixes
> * Qemu script enhancements/fixes
> * Bitbake fetcher fixes
> 
> 
> And you? What fixes would you suggest?

<gentle nudge for feedback>

I guess we don't have many users of Laverne?

Cheers,
Joshua
-- 
Joshua Lock
        Intel Open Source Technology Centre



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2011-01-10 18:13 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-12-20 19:10 Poky Laverne point release Joshua Lock
2011-01-10 18:13 ` Joshua Lock

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.