All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: hirosh.dabui@snom.com (Hirosh Dabui)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] This patch fix a bug in the register indexing for GPIOs numbers > 31
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 09:56:25 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1295945785-7393-1-git-send-email-hirosh.dabui@snom.com> (raw)

to get the relevant hardware registers of tnetv107x to control the GPIOs.

In the structure tnetv107x_gpio_regs:

struct tnetv107x_gpio_regs {
       u32     idver;
       u32     data_in[3];
       u32     data_out[3];
       u32     direction[3];
       u32     enable[3];
};

The GPIO hardware register addresses of tnetv107x are stored.
The chip implements 3 registers of each entity to serve 96 GPIOs,
each register provides a subset of 32 GPIOs.
The driver provides these macros: gpio_reg_set_bit, gpio_reg_get_bit
and gpio_reg_clear_bit.

The bug implied the use of macros to access the relevant hardware
register e.g. the driver code used the macro like this:
'gpio_reg_clear_bit(&reg->data_out, gpio)'

But it has to be used like this:
'gpio_reg_clear_bit(reg->data_out, gpio)'.

The different results are shown here:
- &reg->data_out + 1 (it will add the full array size of data_out i.e. 12 bytes)
- reg->data_out + 1 (it will increment only the size of data_out i.e. only 4 bytes)

Acked-by: Cyril Chemparathy <cyril@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Hirosh Dabui <hirosh.dabui@snom.com>
---
 arch/arm/mach-davinci/gpio-tnetv107x.c |   18 +++++++++---------
 1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/gpio-tnetv107x.c b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/gpio-tnetv107x.c
index d102986..3fa3e28 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/gpio-tnetv107x.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/gpio-tnetv107x.c
@@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ static int tnetv107x_gpio_request(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned offset)
 
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&ctlr->lock, flags);
 
-	gpio_reg_set_bit(&regs->enable, gpio);
+	gpio_reg_set_bit(regs->enable, gpio);
 
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ctlr->lock, flags);
 
@@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ static void tnetv107x_gpio_free(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned offset)
 
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&ctlr->lock, flags);
 
-	gpio_reg_clear_bit(&regs->enable, gpio);
+	gpio_reg_clear_bit(regs->enable, gpio);
 
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ctlr->lock, flags);
 }
@@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ static int tnetv107x_gpio_dir_in(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned offset)
 
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&ctlr->lock, flags);
 
-	gpio_reg_set_bit(&regs->direction, gpio);
+	gpio_reg_set_bit(regs->direction, gpio);
 
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ctlr->lock, flags);
 
@@ -106,11 +106,11 @@ static int tnetv107x_gpio_dir_out(struct gpio_chip *chip,
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&ctlr->lock, flags);
 
 	if (value)
-		gpio_reg_set_bit(&regs->data_out, gpio);
+		gpio_reg_set_bit(regs->data_out, gpio);
 	else
-		gpio_reg_clear_bit(&regs->data_out, gpio);
+		gpio_reg_clear_bit(regs->data_out, gpio);
 
-	gpio_reg_clear_bit(&regs->direction, gpio);
+	gpio_reg_clear_bit(regs->direction, gpio);
 
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ctlr->lock, flags);
 
@@ -124,7 +124,7 @@ static int tnetv107x_gpio_get(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned offset)
 	unsigned gpio = chip->base + offset;
 	int ret;
 
-	ret = gpio_reg_get_bit(&regs->data_in, gpio);
+	ret = gpio_reg_get_bit(regs->data_in, gpio);
 
 	return ret ? 1 : 0;
 }
@@ -140,9 +140,9 @@ static void tnetv107x_gpio_set(struct gpio_chip *chip,
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&ctlr->lock, flags);
 
 	if (value)
-		gpio_reg_set_bit(&regs->data_out, gpio);
+		gpio_reg_set_bit(regs->data_out, gpio);
 	else
-		gpio_reg_clear_bit(&regs->data_out, gpio);
+		gpio_reg_clear_bit(regs->data_out, gpio);
 
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ctlr->lock, flags);
 }
-- 
1.7.1

             reply	other threads:[~2011-01-25  8:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-01-25  8:56 Hirosh Dabui [this message]
2011-01-25 16:00 ` [PATCH] This patch fix a bug in the register indexing for GPIOs numbers > 31 Kevin Hilman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1295945785-7393-1-git-send-email-hirosh.dabui@snom.com \
    --to=hirosh.dabui@snom.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.