* [PATCH] modem: do not allow more than one client to lock down
@ 2011-01-26 7:33 =?unknown-8bit?q?R=C3=A9mi?= Denis-Courmont
2011-01-26 8:54 ` Marcel Holtmann
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: =?unknown-8bit?q?R=C3=A9mi?= Denis-Courmont @ 2011-01-26 7:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ofono
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1103 bytes --]
---
src/modem.c | 13 ++++++-------
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/modem.c b/src/modem.c
index 553549e..a92107e 100644
--- a/src/modem.c
+++ b/src/modem.c
@@ -805,11 +805,14 @@ static DBusMessage *set_property_lockdown(struct ofono_modem *modem,
if (modem->pending != NULL)
return __ofono_error_busy(msg);
+ caller = dbus_message_get_sender(msg);
+
+ if (modem->lockdown && g_strcmp0(caller, modem->lock_owner))
+ return __ofono_error_access_denied(msg);
+
if (modem->lockdown == lockdown)
return dbus_message_new_method_return(msg);
- caller = dbus_message_get_sender(msg);
-
if (lockdown) {
dbus_bool_t powered;
@@ -847,12 +850,8 @@ static DBusMessage *set_property_lockdown(struct ofono_modem *modem,
OFONO_MODEM_INTERFACE,
"Powered", DBUS_TYPE_BOOLEAN,
&powered);
- } else {
- if (g_strcmp0(caller, modem->lock_owner))
- return __ofono_error_access_denied(msg);
-
+ } else
lockdown_remove(modem);
- }
done:
g_dbus_send_reply(conn, msg, DBUS_TYPE_INVALID);
--
1.7.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] modem: do not allow more than one client to lock down
2011-01-26 7:33 [PATCH] modem: do not allow more than one client to lock down =?unknown-8bit?q?R=C3=A9mi?= Denis-Courmont
@ 2011-01-26 8:54 ` Marcel Holtmann
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Marcel Holtmann @ 2011-01-26 8:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ofono
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 929 bytes --]
Hi Remi,
> src/modem.c | 13 ++++++-------
> 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
patch has been applied.
However I added some paranoia protection for lock_owner reset to NULL. I
know that in theory it is protected via lockdown == TRUE, but that is an
issue bound to break something eventually.
> @@ -847,12 +850,8 @@ static DBusMessage *set_property_lockdown(struct ofono_modem *modem,
> OFONO_MODEM_INTERFACE,
> "Powered", DBUS_TYPE_BOOLEAN,
> &powered);
> - } else {
> - if (g_strcmp0(caller, modem->lock_owner))
> - return __ofono_error_access_denied(msg);
> -
> + } else
> lockdown_remove(modem);
> - }
>
> done:
> g_dbus_send_reply(conn, msg, DBUS_TYPE_INVALID);
And since this becomes a one line statement now and we already have a
goto label there, I changed this a bit around and removed the
unnecessary indentation.
Regards
Marcel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-01-26 8:54 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-01-26 7:33 [PATCH] modem: do not allow more than one client to lock down =?unknown-8bit?q?R=C3=A9mi?= Denis-Courmont
2011-01-26 8:54 ` Marcel Holtmann
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.