* [PATCH 2/2] net/netlabel: Avoid call to genlmsg_cancel
@ 2011-01-28 14:17 ` Julia Lawall
0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Julia Lawall @ 2011-01-28 13:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Paul Moore; +Cc: kernel-janitors, David S. Miller, netdev, linux-kernel
genlmsg_cancel subtracts some constants from its second argument before
calling nlmsg_cancel. nlmsg_cancel then calls nlmsg_trim on the same
arguments. nlmsg_trim tests for NULL before doing any computation, but a
NULL second argument to genlmsg_cancel is no longer NULL due to the initial
subtraction. Nothing else happens in this execution, so the call to
genlmsg_cancel is simply unnecessary in this case.
The semantic match that finds this problem is as follows:
(http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
// <smpl>
@@
expression data;
@@
if (data = NULL) { ...
* genlmsg_cancel(..., data);
...
return ...;
}
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
---
net/netlabel/netlabel_cipso_v4.c | 2 +-
net/netlabel/netlabel_mgmt.c | 4 ++--
net/netlabel/netlabel_unlabeled.c | 2 +-
3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/netlabel/netlabel_cipso_v4.c b/net/netlabel/netlabel_cipso_v4.c
index 5f14c84..0a1f77b 100644
--- a/net/netlabel/netlabel_cipso_v4.c
+++ b/net/netlabel/netlabel_cipso_v4.c
@@ -635,7 +635,7 @@ static int netlbl_cipsov4_listall_cb(struct cipso_v4_doi *doi_def, void *arg)
cb_arg->seq, &netlbl_cipsov4_gnl_family,
NLM_F_MULTI, NLBL_CIPSOV4_C_LISTALL);
if (data = NULL)
- goto listall_cb_failure;
+ return ret_val;
ret_val = nla_put_u32(cb_arg->skb, NLBL_CIPSOV4_A_DOI, doi_def->doi);
if (ret_val != 0)
diff --git a/net/netlabel/netlabel_mgmt.c b/net/netlabel/netlabel_mgmt.c
index 998e85e..daaa01d 100644
--- a/net/netlabel/netlabel_mgmt.c
+++ b/net/netlabel/netlabel_mgmt.c
@@ -452,7 +452,7 @@ static int netlbl_mgmt_listall_cb(struct netlbl_dom_map *entry, void *arg)
cb_arg->seq, &netlbl_mgmt_gnl_family,
NLM_F_MULTI, NLBL_MGMT_C_LISTALL);
if (data = NULL)
- goto listall_cb_failure;
+ return ret_val;
ret_val = netlbl_mgmt_listentry(cb_arg->skb, entry);
if (ret_val != 0)
@@ -617,7 +617,7 @@ static int netlbl_mgmt_protocols_cb(struct sk_buff *skb,
&netlbl_mgmt_gnl_family, NLM_F_MULTI,
NLBL_MGMT_C_PROTOCOLS);
if (data = NULL)
- goto protocols_cb_failure;
+ return ret_val;
ret_val = nla_put_u32(skb, NLBL_MGMT_A_PROTOCOL, protocol);
if (ret_val != 0)
diff --git a/net/netlabel/netlabel_unlabeled.c b/net/netlabel/netlabel_unlabeled.c
index e2b0a68..b5d3945 100644
--- a/net/netlabel/netlabel_unlabeled.c
+++ b/net/netlabel/netlabel_unlabeled.c
@@ -1141,7 +1141,7 @@ static int netlbl_unlabel_staticlist_gen(u32 cmd,
cb_arg->seq, &netlbl_unlabel_gnl_family,
NLM_F_MULTI, cmd);
if (data = NULL)
- goto list_cb_failure;
+ return ret_val;
if (iface->ifindex > 0) {
dev = dev_get_by_index(&init_net, iface->ifindex);
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2/2] net/netlabel: Avoid call to genlmsg_cancel
@ 2011-01-28 14:17 ` Julia Lawall
0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Julia Lawall @ 2011-01-28 14:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Paul Moore; +Cc: kernel-janitors, David S. Miller, netdev, linux-kernel
genlmsg_cancel subtracts some constants from its second argument before
calling nlmsg_cancel. nlmsg_cancel then calls nlmsg_trim on the same
arguments. nlmsg_trim tests for NULL before doing any computation, but a
NULL second argument to genlmsg_cancel is no longer NULL due to the initial
subtraction. Nothing else happens in this execution, so the call to
genlmsg_cancel is simply unnecessary in this case.
The semantic match that finds this problem is as follows:
(http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
// <smpl>
@@
expression data;
@@
if (data == NULL) { ...
* genlmsg_cancel(..., data);
...
return ...;
}
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
---
net/netlabel/netlabel_cipso_v4.c | 2 +-
net/netlabel/netlabel_mgmt.c | 4 ++--
net/netlabel/netlabel_unlabeled.c | 2 +-
3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/netlabel/netlabel_cipso_v4.c b/net/netlabel/netlabel_cipso_v4.c
index 5f14c84..0a1f77b 100644
--- a/net/netlabel/netlabel_cipso_v4.c
+++ b/net/netlabel/netlabel_cipso_v4.c
@@ -635,7 +635,7 @@ static int netlbl_cipsov4_listall_cb(struct cipso_v4_doi *doi_def, void *arg)
cb_arg->seq, &netlbl_cipsov4_gnl_family,
NLM_F_MULTI, NLBL_CIPSOV4_C_LISTALL);
if (data == NULL)
- goto listall_cb_failure;
+ return ret_val;
ret_val = nla_put_u32(cb_arg->skb, NLBL_CIPSOV4_A_DOI, doi_def->doi);
if (ret_val != 0)
diff --git a/net/netlabel/netlabel_mgmt.c b/net/netlabel/netlabel_mgmt.c
index 998e85e..daaa01d 100644
--- a/net/netlabel/netlabel_mgmt.c
+++ b/net/netlabel/netlabel_mgmt.c
@@ -452,7 +452,7 @@ static int netlbl_mgmt_listall_cb(struct netlbl_dom_map *entry, void *arg)
cb_arg->seq, &netlbl_mgmt_gnl_family,
NLM_F_MULTI, NLBL_MGMT_C_LISTALL);
if (data == NULL)
- goto listall_cb_failure;
+ return ret_val;
ret_val = netlbl_mgmt_listentry(cb_arg->skb, entry);
if (ret_val != 0)
@@ -617,7 +617,7 @@ static int netlbl_mgmt_protocols_cb(struct sk_buff *skb,
&netlbl_mgmt_gnl_family, NLM_F_MULTI,
NLBL_MGMT_C_PROTOCOLS);
if (data == NULL)
- goto protocols_cb_failure;
+ return ret_val;
ret_val = nla_put_u32(skb, NLBL_MGMT_A_PROTOCOL, protocol);
if (ret_val != 0)
diff --git a/net/netlabel/netlabel_unlabeled.c b/net/netlabel/netlabel_unlabeled.c
index e2b0a68..b5d3945 100644
--- a/net/netlabel/netlabel_unlabeled.c
+++ b/net/netlabel/netlabel_unlabeled.c
@@ -1141,7 +1141,7 @@ static int netlbl_unlabel_staticlist_gen(u32 cmd,
cb_arg->seq, &netlbl_unlabel_gnl_family,
NLM_F_MULTI, cmd);
if (data == NULL)
- goto list_cb_failure;
+ return ret_val;
if (iface->ifindex > 0) {
dev = dev_get_by_index(&init_net, iface->ifindex);
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/2] net/netlabel: Avoid call to genlmsg_cancel
2011-01-28 14:17 ` Julia Lawall
@ 2011-01-28 14:36 ` Paul Moore
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Paul Moore @ 2011-01-28 14:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Julia Lawall; +Cc: kernel-janitors, David S. Miller, netdev, linux-kernel
On Fri, 2011-01-28 at 15:17 +0100, Julia Lawall wrote:
> genlmsg_cancel subtracts some constants from its second argument before
> calling nlmsg_cancel. nlmsg_cancel then calls nlmsg_trim on the same
> arguments. nlmsg_trim tests for NULL before doing any computation, but a
> NULL second argument to genlmsg_cancel is no longer NULL due to the initial
> subtraction. Nothing else happens in this execution, so the call to
> genlmsg_cancel is simply unnecessary in this case.
>
> The semantic match that finds this problem is as follows:
> (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
>
> // <smpl>
> @@
> expression data;
> @@
>
> if (data == NULL) { ...
> * genlmsg_cancel(..., data);
> ...
> return ...;
> }
> // </smpl>
>
> Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
In all of the cases below, these functions are called multiple times to
generate data chunks (additional netlink attributes) which are appended
to an existing skbuff. I believe that the calls to genlmsg_cancel() are
still needed to help cleanup in the case where the functions fail on the
Nth call.
If I'm wrong, feel free to enlighten me.
> ---
> net/netlabel/netlabel_cipso_v4.c | 2 +-
> net/netlabel/netlabel_mgmt.c | 4 ++--
> net/netlabel/netlabel_unlabeled.c | 2 +-
> 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/netlabel/netlabel_cipso_v4.c b/net/netlabel/netlabel_cipso_v4.c
> index 5f14c84..0a1f77b 100644
> --- a/net/netlabel/netlabel_cipso_v4.c
> +++ b/net/netlabel/netlabel_cipso_v4.c
> @@ -635,7 +635,7 @@ static int netlbl_cipsov4_listall_cb(struct cipso_v4_doi *doi_def, void *arg)
> cb_arg->seq, &netlbl_cipsov4_gnl_family,
> NLM_F_MULTI, NLBL_CIPSOV4_C_LISTALL);
> if (data == NULL)
> - goto listall_cb_failure;
> + return ret_val;
>
> ret_val = nla_put_u32(cb_arg->skb, NLBL_CIPSOV4_A_DOI, doi_def->doi);
> if (ret_val != 0)
> diff --git a/net/netlabel/netlabel_mgmt.c b/net/netlabel/netlabel_mgmt.c
> index 998e85e..daaa01d 100644
> --- a/net/netlabel/netlabel_mgmt.c
> +++ b/net/netlabel/netlabel_mgmt.c
> @@ -452,7 +452,7 @@ static int netlbl_mgmt_listall_cb(struct netlbl_dom_map *entry, void *arg)
> cb_arg->seq, &netlbl_mgmt_gnl_family,
> NLM_F_MULTI, NLBL_MGMT_C_LISTALL);
> if (data == NULL)
> - goto listall_cb_failure;
> + return ret_val;
>
> ret_val = netlbl_mgmt_listentry(cb_arg->skb, entry);
> if (ret_val != 0)
> @@ -617,7 +617,7 @@ static int netlbl_mgmt_protocols_cb(struct sk_buff *skb,
> &netlbl_mgmt_gnl_family, NLM_F_MULTI,
> NLBL_MGMT_C_PROTOCOLS);
> if (data == NULL)
> - goto protocols_cb_failure;
> + return ret_val;
>
> ret_val = nla_put_u32(skb, NLBL_MGMT_A_PROTOCOL, protocol);
> if (ret_val != 0)
> diff --git a/net/netlabel/netlabel_unlabeled.c b/net/netlabel/netlabel_unlabeled.c
> index e2b0a68..b5d3945 100644
> --- a/net/netlabel/netlabel_unlabeled.c
> +++ b/net/netlabel/netlabel_unlabeled.c
> @@ -1141,7 +1141,7 @@ static int netlbl_unlabel_staticlist_gen(u32 cmd,
> cb_arg->seq, &netlbl_unlabel_gnl_family,
> NLM_F_MULTI, cmd);
> if (data == NULL)
> - goto list_cb_failure;
> + return ret_val;
>
> if (iface->ifindex > 0) {
> dev = dev_get_by_index(&init_net, iface->ifindex);
>
--
paul moore
linux @ hp
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/2] net/netlabel: Avoid call to genlmsg_cancel
@ 2011-01-28 14:36 ` Paul Moore
0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Paul Moore @ 2011-01-28 14:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Julia Lawall; +Cc: kernel-janitors, David S. Miller, netdev, linux-kernel
On Fri, 2011-01-28 at 15:17 +0100, Julia Lawall wrote:
> genlmsg_cancel subtracts some constants from its second argument before
> calling nlmsg_cancel. nlmsg_cancel then calls nlmsg_trim on the same
> arguments. nlmsg_trim tests for NULL before doing any computation, but a
> NULL second argument to genlmsg_cancel is no longer NULL due to the initial
> subtraction. Nothing else happens in this execution, so the call to
> genlmsg_cancel is simply unnecessary in this case.
>
> The semantic match that finds this problem is as follows:
> (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
>
> // <smpl>
> @@
> expression data;
> @@
>
> if (data = NULL) { ...
> * genlmsg_cancel(..., data);
> ...
> return ...;
> }
> // </smpl>
>
> Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
In all of the cases below, these functions are called multiple times to
generate data chunks (additional netlink attributes) which are appended
to an existing skbuff. I believe that the calls to genlmsg_cancel() are
still needed to help cleanup in the case where the functions fail on the
Nth call.
If I'm wrong, feel free to enlighten me.
> ---
> net/netlabel/netlabel_cipso_v4.c | 2 +-
> net/netlabel/netlabel_mgmt.c | 4 ++--
> net/netlabel/netlabel_unlabeled.c | 2 +-
> 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/netlabel/netlabel_cipso_v4.c b/net/netlabel/netlabel_cipso_v4.c
> index 5f14c84..0a1f77b 100644
> --- a/net/netlabel/netlabel_cipso_v4.c
> +++ b/net/netlabel/netlabel_cipso_v4.c
> @@ -635,7 +635,7 @@ static int netlbl_cipsov4_listall_cb(struct cipso_v4_doi *doi_def, void *arg)
> cb_arg->seq, &netlbl_cipsov4_gnl_family,
> NLM_F_MULTI, NLBL_CIPSOV4_C_LISTALL);
> if (data = NULL)
> - goto listall_cb_failure;
> + return ret_val;
>
> ret_val = nla_put_u32(cb_arg->skb, NLBL_CIPSOV4_A_DOI, doi_def->doi);
> if (ret_val != 0)
> diff --git a/net/netlabel/netlabel_mgmt.c b/net/netlabel/netlabel_mgmt.c
> index 998e85e..daaa01d 100644
> --- a/net/netlabel/netlabel_mgmt.c
> +++ b/net/netlabel/netlabel_mgmt.c
> @@ -452,7 +452,7 @@ static int netlbl_mgmt_listall_cb(struct netlbl_dom_map *entry, void *arg)
> cb_arg->seq, &netlbl_mgmt_gnl_family,
> NLM_F_MULTI, NLBL_MGMT_C_LISTALL);
> if (data = NULL)
> - goto listall_cb_failure;
> + return ret_val;
>
> ret_val = netlbl_mgmt_listentry(cb_arg->skb, entry);
> if (ret_val != 0)
> @@ -617,7 +617,7 @@ static int netlbl_mgmt_protocols_cb(struct sk_buff *skb,
> &netlbl_mgmt_gnl_family, NLM_F_MULTI,
> NLBL_MGMT_C_PROTOCOLS);
> if (data = NULL)
> - goto protocols_cb_failure;
> + return ret_val;
>
> ret_val = nla_put_u32(skb, NLBL_MGMT_A_PROTOCOL, protocol);
> if (ret_val != 0)
> diff --git a/net/netlabel/netlabel_unlabeled.c b/net/netlabel/netlabel_unlabeled.c
> index e2b0a68..b5d3945 100644
> --- a/net/netlabel/netlabel_unlabeled.c
> +++ b/net/netlabel/netlabel_unlabeled.c
> @@ -1141,7 +1141,7 @@ static int netlbl_unlabel_staticlist_gen(u32 cmd,
> cb_arg->seq, &netlbl_unlabel_gnl_family,
> NLM_F_MULTI, cmd);
> if (data = NULL)
> - goto list_cb_failure;
> + return ret_val;
>
> if (iface->ifindex > 0) {
> dev = dev_get_by_index(&init_net, iface->ifindex);
>
--
paul moore
linux @ hp
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/2] net/netlabel: Avoid call to genlmsg_cancel
2011-01-28 14:36 ` Paul Moore
@ 2011-01-28 14:58 ` Julia Lawall
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Julia Lawall @ 2011-01-28 14:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Paul Moore; +Cc: kernel-janitors, David S. Miller, netdev, linux-kernel
On Fri, 28 Jan 2011, Paul Moore wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-01-28 at 15:17 +0100, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > genlmsg_cancel subtracts some constants from its second argument before
> > calling nlmsg_cancel. nlmsg_cancel then calls nlmsg_trim on the same
> > arguments. nlmsg_trim tests for NULL before doing any computation, but a
> > NULL second argument to genlmsg_cancel is no longer NULL due to the initial
> > subtraction. Nothing else happens in this execution, so the call to
> > genlmsg_cancel is simply unnecessary in this case.
> >
> > The semantic match that finds this problem is as follows:
> > (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
> >
> > // <smpl>
> > @@
> > expression data;
> > @@
> >
> > if (data == NULL) { ...
> > * genlmsg_cancel(..., data);
> > ...
> > return ...;
> > }
> > // </smpl>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
>
> In all of the cases below, these functions are called multiple times to
> generate data chunks (additional netlink attributes) which are appended
> to an existing skbuff. I believe that the calls to genlmsg_cancel() are
> still needed to help cleanup in the case where the functions fail on the
> Nth call.
>
> If I'm wrong, feel free to enlighten me.
Perhaps something is needed, but I don't see how the current code can
work. The call is genlmsg_cancel(cb_arg->skb, NULL) in each case.
The definition of genlmsg_cancel is:
static inline void genlmsg_cancel(struct sk_buff *skb, void *hdr)
{
nlmsg_cancel(skb, hdr - GENL_HDRLEN - NLMSG_HDRLEN);
}
Now the second argument to nlmsg_cancel is essentially a negative integer
(or a very large pointer).
nlmsg_cancel will call nlmsg_trim, which is defined as follows:
static inline void nlmsg_trim(struct sk_buff *skb, const void *mark)
{
if (mark)
skb_trim(skb, (unsigned char *) mark - skb->data);
}
I guess that the subtraction is going to result in an even larger negative
number. The whole process is likely to end in doing nothing in the
definition of skb_trim, which is as follows:
void skb_trim(struct sk_buff *skb, unsigned int len)
{
if (skb->len > len)
__skb_trim(skb, len);
}
since the result of casting a negative number to unsigned is likely to be
larger than skb->len.
> > ---
> > net/netlabel/netlabel_cipso_v4.c | 2 +-
> > net/netlabel/netlabel_mgmt.c | 4 ++--
> > net/netlabel/netlabel_unlabeled.c | 2 +-
> > 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/net/netlabel/netlabel_cipso_v4.c b/net/netlabel/netlabel_cipso_v4.c
> > index 5f14c84..0a1f77b 100644
> > --- a/net/netlabel/netlabel_cipso_v4.c
> > +++ b/net/netlabel/netlabel_cipso_v4.c
> > @@ -635,7 +635,7 @@ static int netlbl_cipsov4_listall_cb(struct cipso_v4_doi *doi_def, void *arg)
> > cb_arg->seq, &netlbl_cipsov4_gnl_family,
> > NLM_F_MULTI, NLBL_CIPSOV4_C_LISTALL);
> > if (data == NULL)
> > - goto listall_cb_failure;
> > + return ret_val;
> >
> > ret_val = nla_put_u32(cb_arg->skb, NLBL_CIPSOV4_A_DOI, doi_def->doi);
> > if (ret_val != 0)
> > diff --git a/net/netlabel/netlabel_mgmt.c b/net/netlabel/netlabel_mgmt.c
> > index 998e85e..daaa01d 100644
> > --- a/net/netlabel/netlabel_mgmt.c
> > +++ b/net/netlabel/netlabel_mgmt.c
> > @@ -452,7 +452,7 @@ static int netlbl_mgmt_listall_cb(struct netlbl_dom_map *entry, void *arg)
> > cb_arg->seq, &netlbl_mgmt_gnl_family,
> > NLM_F_MULTI, NLBL_MGMT_C_LISTALL);
> > if (data == NULL)
> > - goto listall_cb_failure;
> > + return ret_val;
> >
> > ret_val = netlbl_mgmt_listentry(cb_arg->skb, entry);
> > if (ret_val != 0)
> > @@ -617,7 +617,7 @@ static int netlbl_mgmt_protocols_cb(struct sk_buff *skb,
> > &netlbl_mgmt_gnl_family, NLM_F_MULTI,
> > NLBL_MGMT_C_PROTOCOLS);
> > if (data == NULL)
> > - goto protocols_cb_failure;
> > + return ret_val;
> >
> > ret_val = nla_put_u32(skb, NLBL_MGMT_A_PROTOCOL, protocol);
> > if (ret_val != 0)
> > diff --git a/net/netlabel/netlabel_unlabeled.c b/net/netlabel/netlabel_unlabeled.c
> > index e2b0a68..b5d3945 100644
> > --- a/net/netlabel/netlabel_unlabeled.c
> > +++ b/net/netlabel/netlabel_unlabeled.c
> > @@ -1141,7 +1141,7 @@ static int netlbl_unlabel_staticlist_gen(u32 cmd,
> > cb_arg->seq, &netlbl_unlabel_gnl_family,
> > NLM_F_MULTI, cmd);
> > if (data == NULL)
> > - goto list_cb_failure;
> > + return ret_val;
> >
> > if (iface->ifindex > 0) {
> > dev = dev_get_by_index(&init_net, iface->ifindex);
> >
>
> --
> paul moore
> linux @ hp
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/2] net/netlabel: Avoid call to genlmsg_cancel
@ 2011-01-28 14:58 ` Julia Lawall
0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Julia Lawall @ 2011-01-28 14:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Paul Moore; +Cc: kernel-janitors, David S. Miller, netdev, linux-kernel
On Fri, 28 Jan 2011, Paul Moore wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-01-28 at 15:17 +0100, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > genlmsg_cancel subtracts some constants from its second argument before
> > calling nlmsg_cancel. nlmsg_cancel then calls nlmsg_trim on the same
> > arguments. nlmsg_trim tests for NULL before doing any computation, but a
> > NULL second argument to genlmsg_cancel is no longer NULL due to the initial
> > subtraction. Nothing else happens in this execution, so the call to
> > genlmsg_cancel is simply unnecessary in this case.
> >
> > The semantic match that finds this problem is as follows:
> > (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
> >
> > // <smpl>
> > @@
> > expression data;
> > @@
> >
> > if (data = NULL) { ...
> > * genlmsg_cancel(..., data);
> > ...
> > return ...;
> > }
> > // </smpl>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
>
> In all of the cases below, these functions are called multiple times to
> generate data chunks (additional netlink attributes) which are appended
> to an existing skbuff. I believe that the calls to genlmsg_cancel() are
> still needed to help cleanup in the case where the functions fail on the
> Nth call.
>
> If I'm wrong, feel free to enlighten me.
Perhaps something is needed, but I don't see how the current code can
work. The call is genlmsg_cancel(cb_arg->skb, NULL) in each case.
The definition of genlmsg_cancel is:
static inline void genlmsg_cancel(struct sk_buff *skb, void *hdr)
{
nlmsg_cancel(skb, hdr - GENL_HDRLEN - NLMSG_HDRLEN);
}
Now the second argument to nlmsg_cancel is essentially a negative integer
(or a very large pointer).
nlmsg_cancel will call nlmsg_trim, which is defined as follows:
static inline void nlmsg_trim(struct sk_buff *skb, const void *mark)
{
if (mark)
skb_trim(skb, (unsigned char *) mark - skb->data);
}
I guess that the subtraction is going to result in an even larger negative
number. The whole process is likely to end in doing nothing in the
definition of skb_trim, which is as follows:
void skb_trim(struct sk_buff *skb, unsigned int len)
{
if (skb->len > len)
__skb_trim(skb, len);
}
since the result of casting a negative number to unsigned is likely to be
larger than skb->len.
> > ---
> > net/netlabel/netlabel_cipso_v4.c | 2 +-
> > net/netlabel/netlabel_mgmt.c | 4 ++--
> > net/netlabel/netlabel_unlabeled.c | 2 +-
> > 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/net/netlabel/netlabel_cipso_v4.c b/net/netlabel/netlabel_cipso_v4.c
> > index 5f14c84..0a1f77b 100644
> > --- a/net/netlabel/netlabel_cipso_v4.c
> > +++ b/net/netlabel/netlabel_cipso_v4.c
> > @@ -635,7 +635,7 @@ static int netlbl_cipsov4_listall_cb(struct cipso_v4_doi *doi_def, void *arg)
> > cb_arg->seq, &netlbl_cipsov4_gnl_family,
> > NLM_F_MULTI, NLBL_CIPSOV4_C_LISTALL);
> > if (data = NULL)
> > - goto listall_cb_failure;
> > + return ret_val;
> >
> > ret_val = nla_put_u32(cb_arg->skb, NLBL_CIPSOV4_A_DOI, doi_def->doi);
> > if (ret_val != 0)
> > diff --git a/net/netlabel/netlabel_mgmt.c b/net/netlabel/netlabel_mgmt.c
> > index 998e85e..daaa01d 100644
> > --- a/net/netlabel/netlabel_mgmt.c
> > +++ b/net/netlabel/netlabel_mgmt.c
> > @@ -452,7 +452,7 @@ static int netlbl_mgmt_listall_cb(struct netlbl_dom_map *entry, void *arg)
> > cb_arg->seq, &netlbl_mgmt_gnl_family,
> > NLM_F_MULTI, NLBL_MGMT_C_LISTALL);
> > if (data = NULL)
> > - goto listall_cb_failure;
> > + return ret_val;
> >
> > ret_val = netlbl_mgmt_listentry(cb_arg->skb, entry);
> > if (ret_val != 0)
> > @@ -617,7 +617,7 @@ static int netlbl_mgmt_protocols_cb(struct sk_buff *skb,
> > &netlbl_mgmt_gnl_family, NLM_F_MULTI,
> > NLBL_MGMT_C_PROTOCOLS);
> > if (data = NULL)
> > - goto protocols_cb_failure;
> > + return ret_val;
> >
> > ret_val = nla_put_u32(skb, NLBL_MGMT_A_PROTOCOL, protocol);
> > if (ret_val != 0)
> > diff --git a/net/netlabel/netlabel_unlabeled.c b/net/netlabel/netlabel_unlabeled.c
> > index e2b0a68..b5d3945 100644
> > --- a/net/netlabel/netlabel_unlabeled.c
> > +++ b/net/netlabel/netlabel_unlabeled.c
> > @@ -1141,7 +1141,7 @@ static int netlbl_unlabel_staticlist_gen(u32 cmd,
> > cb_arg->seq, &netlbl_unlabel_gnl_family,
> > NLM_F_MULTI, cmd);
> > if (data = NULL)
> > - goto list_cb_failure;
> > + return ret_val;
> >
> > if (iface->ifindex > 0) {
> > dev = dev_get_by_index(&init_net, iface->ifindex);
> >
>
> --
> paul moore
> linux @ hp
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/2] net/netlabel: Avoid call to genlmsg_cancel
2011-01-28 14:58 ` Julia Lawall
@ 2011-01-28 15:23 ` Paul Moore
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Paul Moore @ 2011-01-28 15:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Julia Lawall; +Cc: kernel-janitors, David S. Miller, netdev, linux-kernel
On Fri, 2011-01-28 at 15:58 +0100, Julia Lawall wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Jan 2011, Paul Moore wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 2011-01-28 at 15:17 +0100, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > > genlmsg_cancel subtracts some constants from its second argument before
> > > calling nlmsg_cancel. nlmsg_cancel then calls nlmsg_trim on the same
> > > arguments. nlmsg_trim tests for NULL before doing any computation, but a
> > > NULL second argument to genlmsg_cancel is no longer NULL due to the initial
> > > subtraction. Nothing else happens in this execution, so the call to
> > > genlmsg_cancel is simply unnecessary in this case.
> > >
> > > The semantic match that finds this problem is as follows:
> > > (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
> > >
> > > // <smpl>
> > > @@
> > > expression data;
> > > @@
> > >
> > > if (data == NULL) { ...
> > > * genlmsg_cancel(..., data);
> > > ...
> > > return ...;
> > > }
> > > // </smpl>
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
> >
> > In all of the cases below, these functions are called multiple times to
> > generate data chunks (additional netlink attributes) which are appended
> > to an existing skbuff. I believe that the calls to genlmsg_cancel() are
> > still needed to help cleanup in the case where the functions fail on the
> > Nth call.
> >
> > If I'm wrong, feel free to enlighten me.
>
> Perhaps something is needed, but I don't see how the current code can
> work. The call is genlmsg_cancel(cb_arg->skb, NULL) in each case.
Ah yes, you're right. You will have to forgive me as it has been quite
a while since I have looked at NetLabel's netlink code.
You also might consider putting a NULL check in genlmsg_cancel() similar
to the check nlmsg_trim(); that seems like a worthwhile addition.
> The definition of genlmsg_cancel is:
>
> static inline void genlmsg_cancel(struct sk_buff *skb, void *hdr)
> {
> nlmsg_cancel(skb, hdr - GENL_HDRLEN - NLMSG_HDRLEN);
> }
>
> Now the second argument to nlmsg_cancel is essentially a negative integer
> (or a very large pointer).
>
> nlmsg_cancel will call nlmsg_trim, which is defined as follows:
>
> static inline void nlmsg_trim(struct sk_buff *skb, const void *mark)
> {
> if (mark)
> skb_trim(skb, (unsigned char *) mark - skb->data);
> }
>
> I guess that the subtraction is going to result in an even larger negative
> number. The whole process is likely to end in doing nothing in the
> definition of skb_trim, which is as follows:
>
> void skb_trim(struct sk_buff *skb, unsigned int len)
> {
> if (skb->len > len)
> __skb_trim(skb, len);
> }
>
> since the result of casting a negative number to unsigned is likely to be
> larger than skb->len.
>
>
> > > ---
> > > net/netlabel/netlabel_cipso_v4.c | 2 +-
> > > net/netlabel/netlabel_mgmt.c | 4 ++--
> > > net/netlabel/netlabel_unlabeled.c | 2 +-
> > > 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/net/netlabel/netlabel_cipso_v4.c b/net/netlabel/netlabel_cipso_v4.c
> > > index 5f14c84..0a1f77b 100644
> > > --- a/net/netlabel/netlabel_cipso_v4.c
> > > +++ b/net/netlabel/netlabel_cipso_v4.c
> > > @@ -635,7 +635,7 @@ static int netlbl_cipsov4_listall_cb(struct cipso_v4_doi *doi_def, void *arg)
> > > cb_arg->seq, &netlbl_cipsov4_gnl_family,
> > > NLM_F_MULTI, NLBL_CIPSOV4_C_LISTALL);
> > > if (data == NULL)
> > > - goto listall_cb_failure;
> > > + return ret_val;
> > >
> > > ret_val = nla_put_u32(cb_arg->skb, NLBL_CIPSOV4_A_DOI, doi_def->doi);
> > > if (ret_val != 0)
> > > diff --git a/net/netlabel/netlabel_mgmt.c b/net/netlabel/netlabel_mgmt.c
> > > index 998e85e..daaa01d 100644
> > > --- a/net/netlabel/netlabel_mgmt.c
> > > +++ b/net/netlabel/netlabel_mgmt.c
> > > @@ -452,7 +452,7 @@ static int netlbl_mgmt_listall_cb(struct netlbl_dom_map *entry, void *arg)
> > > cb_arg->seq, &netlbl_mgmt_gnl_family,
> > > NLM_F_MULTI, NLBL_MGMT_C_LISTALL);
> > > if (data == NULL)
> > > - goto listall_cb_failure;
> > > + return ret_val;
> > >
> > > ret_val = netlbl_mgmt_listentry(cb_arg->skb, entry);
> > > if (ret_val != 0)
> > > @@ -617,7 +617,7 @@ static int netlbl_mgmt_protocols_cb(struct sk_buff *skb,
> > > &netlbl_mgmt_gnl_family, NLM_F_MULTI,
> > > NLBL_MGMT_C_PROTOCOLS);
> > > if (data == NULL)
> > > - goto protocols_cb_failure;
> > > + return ret_val;
> > >
> > > ret_val = nla_put_u32(skb, NLBL_MGMT_A_PROTOCOL, protocol);
> > > if (ret_val != 0)
> > > diff --git a/net/netlabel/netlabel_unlabeled.c b/net/netlabel/netlabel_unlabeled.c
> > > index e2b0a68..b5d3945 100644
> > > --- a/net/netlabel/netlabel_unlabeled.c
> > > +++ b/net/netlabel/netlabel_unlabeled.c
> > > @@ -1141,7 +1141,7 @@ static int netlbl_unlabel_staticlist_gen(u32 cmd,
> > > cb_arg->seq, &netlbl_unlabel_gnl_family,
> > > NLM_F_MULTI, cmd);
> > > if (data == NULL)
> > > - goto list_cb_failure;
> > > + return ret_val;
> > >
> > > if (iface->ifindex > 0) {
> > > dev = dev_get_by_index(&init_net, iface->ifindex);
> > >
> >
> > --
> > paul moore
> > linux @ hp
> >
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> >
--
paul moore
linux @ hp
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/2] net/netlabel: Avoid call to genlmsg_cancel
@ 2011-01-28 15:23 ` Paul Moore
0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Paul Moore @ 2011-01-28 15:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Julia Lawall; +Cc: kernel-janitors, David S. Miller, netdev, linux-kernel
On Fri, 2011-01-28 at 15:58 +0100, Julia Lawall wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Jan 2011, Paul Moore wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 2011-01-28 at 15:17 +0100, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > > genlmsg_cancel subtracts some constants from its second argument before
> > > calling nlmsg_cancel. nlmsg_cancel then calls nlmsg_trim on the same
> > > arguments. nlmsg_trim tests for NULL before doing any computation, but a
> > > NULL second argument to genlmsg_cancel is no longer NULL due to the initial
> > > subtraction. Nothing else happens in this execution, so the call to
> > > genlmsg_cancel is simply unnecessary in this case.
> > >
> > > The semantic match that finds this problem is as follows:
> > > (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
> > >
> > > // <smpl>
> > > @@
> > > expression data;
> > > @@
> > >
> > > if (data = NULL) { ...
> > > * genlmsg_cancel(..., data);
> > > ...
> > > return ...;
> > > }
> > > // </smpl>
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
> >
> > In all of the cases below, these functions are called multiple times to
> > generate data chunks (additional netlink attributes) which are appended
> > to an existing skbuff. I believe that the calls to genlmsg_cancel() are
> > still needed to help cleanup in the case where the functions fail on the
> > Nth call.
> >
> > If I'm wrong, feel free to enlighten me.
>
> Perhaps something is needed, but I don't see how the current code can
> work. The call is genlmsg_cancel(cb_arg->skb, NULL) in each case.
Ah yes, you're right. You will have to forgive me as it has been quite
a while since I have looked at NetLabel's netlink code.
You also might consider putting a NULL check in genlmsg_cancel() similar
to the check nlmsg_trim(); that seems like a worthwhile addition.
> The definition of genlmsg_cancel is:
>
> static inline void genlmsg_cancel(struct sk_buff *skb, void *hdr)
> {
> nlmsg_cancel(skb, hdr - GENL_HDRLEN - NLMSG_HDRLEN);
> }
>
> Now the second argument to nlmsg_cancel is essentially a negative integer
> (or a very large pointer).
>
> nlmsg_cancel will call nlmsg_trim, which is defined as follows:
>
> static inline void nlmsg_trim(struct sk_buff *skb, const void *mark)
> {
> if (mark)
> skb_trim(skb, (unsigned char *) mark - skb->data);
> }
>
> I guess that the subtraction is going to result in an even larger negative
> number. The whole process is likely to end in doing nothing in the
> definition of skb_trim, which is as follows:
>
> void skb_trim(struct sk_buff *skb, unsigned int len)
> {
> if (skb->len > len)
> __skb_trim(skb, len);
> }
>
> since the result of casting a negative number to unsigned is likely to be
> larger than skb->len.
>
>
> > > ---
> > > net/netlabel/netlabel_cipso_v4.c | 2 +-
> > > net/netlabel/netlabel_mgmt.c | 4 ++--
> > > net/netlabel/netlabel_unlabeled.c | 2 +-
> > > 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/net/netlabel/netlabel_cipso_v4.c b/net/netlabel/netlabel_cipso_v4.c
> > > index 5f14c84..0a1f77b 100644
> > > --- a/net/netlabel/netlabel_cipso_v4.c
> > > +++ b/net/netlabel/netlabel_cipso_v4.c
> > > @@ -635,7 +635,7 @@ static int netlbl_cipsov4_listall_cb(struct cipso_v4_doi *doi_def, void *arg)
> > > cb_arg->seq, &netlbl_cipsov4_gnl_family,
> > > NLM_F_MULTI, NLBL_CIPSOV4_C_LISTALL);
> > > if (data = NULL)
> > > - goto listall_cb_failure;
> > > + return ret_val;
> > >
> > > ret_val = nla_put_u32(cb_arg->skb, NLBL_CIPSOV4_A_DOI, doi_def->doi);
> > > if (ret_val != 0)
> > > diff --git a/net/netlabel/netlabel_mgmt.c b/net/netlabel/netlabel_mgmt.c
> > > index 998e85e..daaa01d 100644
> > > --- a/net/netlabel/netlabel_mgmt.c
> > > +++ b/net/netlabel/netlabel_mgmt.c
> > > @@ -452,7 +452,7 @@ static int netlbl_mgmt_listall_cb(struct netlbl_dom_map *entry, void *arg)
> > > cb_arg->seq, &netlbl_mgmt_gnl_family,
> > > NLM_F_MULTI, NLBL_MGMT_C_LISTALL);
> > > if (data = NULL)
> > > - goto listall_cb_failure;
> > > + return ret_val;
> > >
> > > ret_val = netlbl_mgmt_listentry(cb_arg->skb, entry);
> > > if (ret_val != 0)
> > > @@ -617,7 +617,7 @@ static int netlbl_mgmt_protocols_cb(struct sk_buff *skb,
> > > &netlbl_mgmt_gnl_family, NLM_F_MULTI,
> > > NLBL_MGMT_C_PROTOCOLS);
> > > if (data = NULL)
> > > - goto protocols_cb_failure;
> > > + return ret_val;
> > >
> > > ret_val = nla_put_u32(skb, NLBL_MGMT_A_PROTOCOL, protocol);
> > > if (ret_val != 0)
> > > diff --git a/net/netlabel/netlabel_unlabeled.c b/net/netlabel/netlabel_unlabeled.c
> > > index e2b0a68..b5d3945 100644
> > > --- a/net/netlabel/netlabel_unlabeled.c
> > > +++ b/net/netlabel/netlabel_unlabeled.c
> > > @@ -1141,7 +1141,7 @@ static int netlbl_unlabel_staticlist_gen(u32 cmd,
> > > cb_arg->seq, &netlbl_unlabel_gnl_family,
> > > NLM_F_MULTI, cmd);
> > > if (data = NULL)
> > > - goto list_cb_failure;
> > > + return ret_val;
> > >
> > > if (iface->ifindex > 0) {
> > > dev = dev_get_by_index(&init_net, iface->ifindex);
> > >
> >
> > --
> > paul moore
> > linux @ hp
> >
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> >
--
paul moore
linux @ hp
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/2] net/netlabel: Avoid call to genlmsg_cancel
2011-01-28 15:23 ` Paul Moore
@ 2011-01-28 15:29 ` Julia Lawall
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Julia Lawall @ 2011-01-28 15:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Paul Moore; +Cc: kernel-janitors, David S. Miller, netdev, linux-kernel
On Fri, 28 Jan 2011, Paul Moore wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-01-28 at 15:58 +0100, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > On Fri, 28 Jan 2011, Paul Moore wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, 2011-01-28 at 15:17 +0100, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > > > genlmsg_cancel subtracts some constants from its second argument before
> > > > calling nlmsg_cancel. nlmsg_cancel then calls nlmsg_trim on the same
> > > > arguments. nlmsg_trim tests for NULL before doing any computation, but a
> > > > NULL second argument to genlmsg_cancel is no longer NULL due to the initial
> > > > subtraction. Nothing else happens in this execution, so the call to
> > > > genlmsg_cancel is simply unnecessary in this case.
> > > >
> > > > The semantic match that finds this problem is as follows:
> > > > (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
> > > >
> > > > // <smpl>
> > > > @@
> > > > expression data;
> > > > @@
> > > >
> > > > if (data == NULL) { ...
> > > > * genlmsg_cancel(..., data);
> > > > ...
> > > > return ...;
> > > > }
> > > > // </smpl>
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
> > >
> > > In all of the cases below, these functions are called multiple times to
> > > generate data chunks (additional netlink attributes) which are appended
> > > to an existing skbuff. I believe that the calls to genlmsg_cancel() are
> > > still needed to help cleanup in the case where the functions fail on the
> > > Nth call.
> > >
> > > If I'm wrong, feel free to enlighten me.
> >
> > Perhaps something is needed, but I don't see how the current code can
> > work. The call is genlmsg_cancel(cb_arg->skb, NULL) in each case.
>
> Ah yes, you're right. You will have to forgive me as it has been quite
> a while since I have looked at NetLabel's netlink code.
>
> You also might consider putting a NULL check in genlmsg_cancel() similar
> to the check nlmsg_trim(); that seems like a worthwhile addition.
OK, I'll do that.
julia
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/2] net/netlabel: Avoid call to genlmsg_cancel
@ 2011-01-28 15:29 ` Julia Lawall
0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Julia Lawall @ 2011-01-28 15:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Paul Moore; +Cc: kernel-janitors, David S. Miller, netdev, linux-kernel
On Fri, 28 Jan 2011, Paul Moore wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-01-28 at 15:58 +0100, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > On Fri, 28 Jan 2011, Paul Moore wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, 2011-01-28 at 15:17 +0100, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > > > genlmsg_cancel subtracts some constants from its second argument before
> > > > calling nlmsg_cancel. nlmsg_cancel then calls nlmsg_trim on the same
> > > > arguments. nlmsg_trim tests for NULL before doing any computation, but a
> > > > NULL second argument to genlmsg_cancel is no longer NULL due to the initial
> > > > subtraction. Nothing else happens in this execution, so the call to
> > > > genlmsg_cancel is simply unnecessary in this case.
> > > >
> > > > The semantic match that finds this problem is as follows:
> > > > (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
> > > >
> > > > // <smpl>
> > > > @@
> > > > expression data;
> > > > @@
> > > >
> > > > if (data = NULL) { ...
> > > > * genlmsg_cancel(..., data);
> > > > ...
> > > > return ...;
> > > > }
> > > > // </smpl>
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
> > >
> > > In all of the cases below, these functions are called multiple times to
> > > generate data chunks (additional netlink attributes) which are appended
> > > to an existing skbuff. I believe that the calls to genlmsg_cancel() are
> > > still needed to help cleanup in the case where the functions fail on the
> > > Nth call.
> > >
> > > If I'm wrong, feel free to enlighten me.
> >
> > Perhaps something is needed, but I don't see how the current code can
> > work. The call is genlmsg_cancel(cb_arg->skb, NULL) in each case.
>
> Ah yes, you're right. You will have to forgive me as it has been quite
> a while since I have looked at NetLabel's netlink code.
>
> You also might consider putting a NULL check in genlmsg_cancel() similar
> to the check nlmsg_trim(); that seems like a worthwhile addition.
OK, I'll do that.
julia
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/2] net/netlabel: Avoid call to genlmsg_cancel
2011-01-28 14:17 ` Julia Lawall
@ 2011-01-28 15:46 ` Paul Moore
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Paul Moore @ 2011-01-28 15:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Julia Lawall; +Cc: kernel-janitors, David S. Miller, netdev, linux-kernel
On Fri, 2011-01-28 at 15:17 +0100, Julia Lawall wrote:
> genlmsg_cancel subtracts some constants from its second argument before
> calling nlmsg_cancel. nlmsg_cancel then calls nlmsg_trim on the same
> arguments. nlmsg_trim tests for NULL before doing any computation, but a
> NULL second argument to genlmsg_cancel is no longer NULL due to the initial
> subtraction. Nothing else happens in this execution, so the call to
> genlmsg_cancel is simply unnecessary in this case.
>
> The semantic match that finds this problem is as follows:
> (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
>
> // <smpl>
> @@
> expression data;
> @@
>
> if (data == NULL) { ...
> * genlmsg_cancel(..., data);
> ...
> return ...;
> }
> // </smpl>
>
> Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
Acked-by: Paul Moore <paul.moore@hp.com>
> ---
> net/netlabel/netlabel_cipso_v4.c | 2 +-
> net/netlabel/netlabel_mgmt.c | 4 ++--
> net/netlabel/netlabel_unlabeled.c | 2 +-
> 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/netlabel/netlabel_cipso_v4.c b/net/netlabel/netlabel_cipso_v4.c
> index 5f14c84..0a1f77b 100644
> --- a/net/netlabel/netlabel_cipso_v4.c
> +++ b/net/netlabel/netlabel_cipso_v4.c
> @@ -635,7 +635,7 @@ static int netlbl_cipsov4_listall_cb(struct cipso_v4_doi *doi_def, void *arg)
> cb_arg->seq, &netlbl_cipsov4_gnl_family,
> NLM_F_MULTI, NLBL_CIPSOV4_C_LISTALL);
> if (data == NULL)
> - goto listall_cb_failure;
> + return ret_val;
>
> ret_val = nla_put_u32(cb_arg->skb, NLBL_CIPSOV4_A_DOI, doi_def->doi);
> if (ret_val != 0)
> diff --git a/net/netlabel/netlabel_mgmt.c b/net/netlabel/netlabel_mgmt.c
> index 998e85e..daaa01d 100644
> --- a/net/netlabel/netlabel_mgmt.c
> +++ b/net/netlabel/netlabel_mgmt.c
> @@ -452,7 +452,7 @@ static int netlbl_mgmt_listall_cb(struct netlbl_dom_map *entry, void *arg)
> cb_arg->seq, &netlbl_mgmt_gnl_family,
> NLM_F_MULTI, NLBL_MGMT_C_LISTALL);
> if (data == NULL)
> - goto listall_cb_failure;
> + return ret_val;
>
> ret_val = netlbl_mgmt_listentry(cb_arg->skb, entry);
> if (ret_val != 0)
> @@ -617,7 +617,7 @@ static int netlbl_mgmt_protocols_cb(struct sk_buff *skb,
> &netlbl_mgmt_gnl_family, NLM_F_MULTI,
> NLBL_MGMT_C_PROTOCOLS);
> if (data == NULL)
> - goto protocols_cb_failure;
> + return ret_val;
>
> ret_val = nla_put_u32(skb, NLBL_MGMT_A_PROTOCOL, protocol);
> if (ret_val != 0)
> diff --git a/net/netlabel/netlabel_unlabeled.c b/net/netlabel/netlabel_unlabeled.c
> index e2b0a68..b5d3945 100644
> --- a/net/netlabel/netlabel_unlabeled.c
> +++ b/net/netlabel/netlabel_unlabeled.c
> @@ -1141,7 +1141,7 @@ static int netlbl_unlabel_staticlist_gen(u32 cmd,
> cb_arg->seq, &netlbl_unlabel_gnl_family,
> NLM_F_MULTI, cmd);
> if (data == NULL)
> - goto list_cb_failure;
> + return ret_val;
>
> if (iface->ifindex > 0) {
> dev = dev_get_by_index(&init_net, iface->ifindex);
>
--
paul moore
linux @ hp
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/2] net/netlabel: Avoid call to genlmsg_cancel
@ 2011-01-28 15:46 ` Paul Moore
0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Paul Moore @ 2011-01-28 15:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Julia Lawall; +Cc: kernel-janitors, David S. Miller, netdev, linux-kernel
On Fri, 2011-01-28 at 15:17 +0100, Julia Lawall wrote:
> genlmsg_cancel subtracts some constants from its second argument before
> calling nlmsg_cancel. nlmsg_cancel then calls nlmsg_trim on the same
> arguments. nlmsg_trim tests for NULL before doing any computation, but a
> NULL second argument to genlmsg_cancel is no longer NULL due to the initial
> subtraction. Nothing else happens in this execution, so the call to
> genlmsg_cancel is simply unnecessary in this case.
>
> The semantic match that finds this problem is as follows:
> (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
>
> // <smpl>
> @@
> expression data;
> @@
>
> if (data = NULL) { ...
> * genlmsg_cancel(..., data);
> ...
> return ...;
> }
> // </smpl>
>
> Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
Acked-by: Paul Moore <paul.moore@hp.com>
> ---
> net/netlabel/netlabel_cipso_v4.c | 2 +-
> net/netlabel/netlabel_mgmt.c | 4 ++--
> net/netlabel/netlabel_unlabeled.c | 2 +-
> 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/netlabel/netlabel_cipso_v4.c b/net/netlabel/netlabel_cipso_v4.c
> index 5f14c84..0a1f77b 100644
> --- a/net/netlabel/netlabel_cipso_v4.c
> +++ b/net/netlabel/netlabel_cipso_v4.c
> @@ -635,7 +635,7 @@ static int netlbl_cipsov4_listall_cb(struct cipso_v4_doi *doi_def, void *arg)
> cb_arg->seq, &netlbl_cipsov4_gnl_family,
> NLM_F_MULTI, NLBL_CIPSOV4_C_LISTALL);
> if (data = NULL)
> - goto listall_cb_failure;
> + return ret_val;
>
> ret_val = nla_put_u32(cb_arg->skb, NLBL_CIPSOV4_A_DOI, doi_def->doi);
> if (ret_val != 0)
> diff --git a/net/netlabel/netlabel_mgmt.c b/net/netlabel/netlabel_mgmt.c
> index 998e85e..daaa01d 100644
> --- a/net/netlabel/netlabel_mgmt.c
> +++ b/net/netlabel/netlabel_mgmt.c
> @@ -452,7 +452,7 @@ static int netlbl_mgmt_listall_cb(struct netlbl_dom_map *entry, void *arg)
> cb_arg->seq, &netlbl_mgmt_gnl_family,
> NLM_F_MULTI, NLBL_MGMT_C_LISTALL);
> if (data = NULL)
> - goto listall_cb_failure;
> + return ret_val;
>
> ret_val = netlbl_mgmt_listentry(cb_arg->skb, entry);
> if (ret_val != 0)
> @@ -617,7 +617,7 @@ static int netlbl_mgmt_protocols_cb(struct sk_buff *skb,
> &netlbl_mgmt_gnl_family, NLM_F_MULTI,
> NLBL_MGMT_C_PROTOCOLS);
> if (data = NULL)
> - goto protocols_cb_failure;
> + return ret_val;
>
> ret_val = nla_put_u32(skb, NLBL_MGMT_A_PROTOCOL, protocol);
> if (ret_val != 0)
> diff --git a/net/netlabel/netlabel_unlabeled.c b/net/netlabel/netlabel_unlabeled.c
> index e2b0a68..b5d3945 100644
> --- a/net/netlabel/netlabel_unlabeled.c
> +++ b/net/netlabel/netlabel_unlabeled.c
> @@ -1141,7 +1141,7 @@ static int netlbl_unlabel_staticlist_gen(u32 cmd,
> cb_arg->seq, &netlbl_unlabel_gnl_family,
> NLM_F_MULTI, cmd);
> if (data = NULL)
> - goto list_cb_failure;
> + return ret_val;
>
> if (iface->ifindex > 0) {
> dev = dev_get_by_index(&init_net, iface->ifindex);
>
--
paul moore
linux @ hp
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-01-28 15:47 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-01-28 13:58 [PATCH 2/2] net/netlabel: Avoid call to genlmsg_cancel Julia Lawall
2011-01-28 14:17 ` Julia Lawall
2011-01-28 14:36 ` Paul Moore
2011-01-28 14:36 ` Paul Moore
2011-01-28 14:58 ` Julia Lawall
2011-01-28 14:58 ` Julia Lawall
2011-01-28 15:23 ` Paul Moore
2011-01-28 15:23 ` Paul Moore
2011-01-28 15:29 ` Julia Lawall
2011-01-28 15:29 ` Julia Lawall
2011-01-28 15:46 ` Paul Moore
2011-01-28 15:46 ` Paul Moore
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.