From: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no>
To: j223yang@asset.uwaterloo.ca
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch]xprt: remove redundant checks
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 10:25:40 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1300285540.16266.49.camel@lade.trondhjem.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110316064509.GA1498@asset.uwaterloo.ca>
On Wed, 2011-03-16 at 02:45 -0400, j223yang@asset.uwaterloo.ca wrote:
> 'req' is already dereferenced in
> 'struct rpc_xprt *xprt = req->rq_xprt;',
> but check again later in the function.
> The patch removes these redundant checks.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jinqiu Yang <crindy646@gmail.com>
> ---
> xprt.c | 8 +++-----
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/sunrpt/xprt.c b/net/sunrpt/xprt.c
> --- a/net/sunrpc/xprt.c 2011-03-16 00:10:08.764164573 -0400
> +++ b/net/sunrpt/xprt.c 2011-03-16 02:33:38.559164414 -0400
> @@ -202,10 +202,8 @@ int xprt_reserve_xprt(struct rpc_task *t
> goto out_sleep;
> }
> xprt->snd_task = task;
> - if (req) {
> - req->rq_bytes_sent = 0;
> - req->rq_ntrans++;
> - }
> + req->rq_bytes_sent = 0;
> + req->rq_ntrans++;
> return 1;
>
> out_sleep:
> @@ -213,7 +211,7 @@ out_sleep:
> task->tk_pid, xprt);
> task->tk_timeout = 0;
> task->tk_status = -EAGAIN;
> - if (req && req->rq_ntrans)
> + if (req->rq_ntrans)
> rpc_sleep_on(&xprt->resend, task, NULL);
> else
> rpc_sleep_on(&xprt->sending, task, NULL);
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
You already sent hunk 1 in a different patch, and I've already applied
that to the nfs-for-2.6.39 branch. Could you therefore please resend
this patch with just the second hunk.
Cheers
Trond
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no>
To: j223yang-I6MVnP1QzuRPSEYXltEZZrDks+cytr/Z@public.gmane.org
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch]xprt: remove redundant checks
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 10:25:40 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1300285540.16266.49.camel@lade.trondhjem.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110316064509.GA1498-I6MVnP1QzuRPSEYXltEZZrDks+cytr/Z@public.gmane.org>
On Wed, 2011-03-16 at 02:45 -0400, j223yang-I6MVnP1QzuRPSEYXltEZZrDks+cytr/Z@public.gmane.org wrote:
> 'req' is already dereferenced in
> 'struct rpc_xprt *xprt = req->rq_xprt;',
> but check again later in the function.
> The patch removes these redundant checks.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jinqiu Yang <crindy646@gmail.com>
> ---
> xprt.c | 8 +++-----
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/sunrpt/xprt.c b/net/sunrpt/xprt.c
> --- a/net/sunrpc/xprt.c 2011-03-16 00:10:08.764164573 -0400
> +++ b/net/sunrpt/xprt.c 2011-03-16 02:33:38.559164414 -0400
> @@ -202,10 +202,8 @@ int xprt_reserve_xprt(struct rpc_task *t
> goto out_sleep;
> }
> xprt->snd_task = task;
> - if (req) {
> - req->rq_bytes_sent = 0;
> - req->rq_ntrans++;
> - }
> + req->rq_bytes_sent = 0;
> + req->rq_ntrans++;
> return 1;
>
> out_sleep:
> @@ -213,7 +211,7 @@ out_sleep:
> task->tk_pid, xprt);
> task->tk_timeout = 0;
> task->tk_status = -EAGAIN;
> - if (req && req->rq_ntrans)
> + if (req->rq_ntrans)
> rpc_sleep_on(&xprt->resend, task, NULL);
> else
> rpc_sleep_on(&xprt->sending, task, NULL);
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
You already sent hunk 1 in a different patch, and I've already applied
that to the nfs-for-2.6.39 branch. Could you therefore please resend
this patch with just the second hunk.
Cheers
Trond
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-16 14:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-16 6:45 [patch]xprt: remove redundant checks j223yang
2011-03-16 14:25 ` Trond Myklebust [this message]
2011-03-16 14:25 ` Trond Myklebust
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1300285540.16266.49.camel@lade.trondhjem.org \
--to=trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no \
--cc=j223yang@asset.uwaterloo.ca \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.