All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* veto CONFIG_MTD_PARTITIONS?
@ 2011-04-15 10:09 Artem Bityutskiy
  2011-04-18  9:30 ` Artem Bityutskiy
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Artem Bityutskiy @ 2011-04-15 10:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-mtd; +Cc: Thomas Gleixner, David Woodhouse, jwboyer

Hi,

we have a very small mtdpart driver which provides very basic mtd
partitioning services. And this driver may be compiled out. This
probably mattered many years ago, when saving ~7KiB (on arm arch)
mattered a lot.

But this creates mess:

[dedekind@eru l2-mtd-2.6]$ grep -r CONFIG_MTD_PARTITIONS drivers/mtd/* |
wc -l
132

We have really a lot of these "#ifdef CONFIG_MTD_PARTITIONS" statements,
nearly in every driver. And new drivers have this.

I think it is time to declare than saving ~7KiB is not worth the mess
anymore and veto CONFIG_MTD_PARTITIONS - no new "#ifdef
CONFIG_MTD_PARTITIONS" should be accepted.

Someone should just make mtdpart.c to be an integral part of the MTD
core and remove all those #ifdefs.

Hopefully we'll force someone to clean this up.

If no one strongly disagrees, let's veto CONFIG_MTD_PARTITIONS usage.

-- 
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy (Артём Битюцкий)

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: veto CONFIG_MTD_PARTITIONS?
  2011-04-15 10:09 veto CONFIG_MTD_PARTITIONS? Artem Bityutskiy
@ 2011-04-18  9:30 ` Artem Bityutskiy
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Artem Bityutskiy @ 2011-04-18  9:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-mtd; +Cc: Thomas Gleixner, David Woodhouse, jwboyer

On Fri, 2011-04-15 at 13:09 +0300, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> we have a very small mtdpart driver which provides very basic mtd
> partitioning services. And this driver may be compiled out. This
> probably mattered many years ago, when saving ~7KiB (on arm arch)
> mattered a lot.
> 
> But this creates mess:
> 
> [dedekind@eru l2-mtd-2.6]$ grep -r CONFIG_MTD_PARTITIONS drivers/mtd/* |
> wc -l
> 132
> 
> We have really a lot of these "#ifdef CONFIG_MTD_PARTITIONS" statements,
> nearly in every driver. And new drivers have this.
> 
> I think it is time to declare than saving ~7KiB is not worth the mess
> anymore and veto CONFIG_MTD_PARTITIONS - no new "#ifdef
> CONFIG_MTD_PARTITIONS" should be accepted.
> 
> Someone should just make mtdpart.c to be an integral part of the MTD
> core and remove all those #ifdefs.
> 
> Hopefully we'll force someone to clean this up.
> 
> If no one strongly disagrees, let's veto CONFIG_MTD_PARTITIONS usage.

OK, since no one disagreed, and tglx explicitly agreed in the mtd chat,
and dwmw2 kind of supported this, let's prohibit more
CONFIG_MTD_PARTITIONS usage and try to force people to clean this up.

I've updated the MTD web site with this information:
http://www.linux-mtd.infradead.org/doc/general.html#L_partitions_ban

-- 
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy (Артём Битюцкий)

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2011-04-18  9:33 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-04-15 10:09 veto CONFIG_MTD_PARTITIONS? Artem Bityutskiy
2011-04-18  9:30 ` Artem Bityutskiy

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.