* [PATCH][RFC] OMAP4: I2C : I2C context save
@ 2011-07-05 9:20 Shubhrajyoti D
[not found] ` <1309857646-29401-1-git-send-email-shubhrajyoti-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Shubhrajyoti D @ 2011-07-05 9:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA
Cc: linux-omap-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, Shubhrajyoti D
Currently the OMAP4 doesnot hit device off still the
driver may have support for it.Adding support for the
same.
Signed-off-by: Shubhrajyoti D <shubhrajyoti-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
---
Applies on top of patches from Andy Green
http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-i2c/msg05632.html
Tested on OMAP4430
arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod_44xx_data.c | 3 ++-
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod_44xx_data.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod_44xx_data.c
index 0fe9556..5e2c748 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod_44xx_data.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod_44xx_data.c
@@ -2130,7 +2130,8 @@ static struct omap_hwmod_class omap44xx_i2c_hwmod_class = {
};
static struct omap_i2c_dev_attr i2c_dev_attr = {
- .flags = OMAP_I2C_FLAG_BUS_SHIFT_NONE,
+ .flags = OMAP_I2C_FLAG_BUS_SHIFT_NONE |
+ OMAP_I2C_FLAG_RESET_REGS_POSTIDLE,
};
/* i2c1 */
--
1.7.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH][RFC] OMAP4: I2C : I2C context save
[not found] ` <1309857646-29401-1-git-send-email-shubhrajyoti-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
@ 2011-07-13 19:07 ` Ben Dooks
2011-07-13 21:15 ` Kevin Hilman
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Ben Dooks @ 2011-07-13 19:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Shubhrajyoti D
Cc: linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, linux-omap-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA
On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 02:50:46PM +0530, Shubhrajyoti D wrote:
> Currently the OMAP4 doesnot hit device off still the
> driver may have support for it.Adding support for the
> same.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shubhrajyoti D <shubhrajyoti-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
I guess since the previous set has been taken by Kevin
then these will be too.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH][RFC] OMAP4: I2C : I2C context save
2011-07-13 19:07 ` Ben Dooks
@ 2011-07-13 21:15 ` Kevin Hilman
[not found] ` <87k4blopaw.fsf-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Kevin Hilman @ 2011-07-13 21:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ben Dooks; +Cc: Shubhrajyoti D, linux-i2c, linux-omap
Ben Dooks <ben-i2c@fluff.org> writes:
> On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 02:50:46PM +0530, Shubhrajyoti D wrote:
>> Currently the OMAP4 doesnot hit device off still the
>> driver may have support for it.Adding support for the
>> same.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Shubhrajyoti D <shubhrajyoti@ti.com>
>
> I guess since the previous set has been taken by Kevin
> then these will be too.
Sure, I'll pick these up, but it's probably to late for v3.1.
We've already submitted the bulk of the OMAP stuff for v3.1.
Kevin
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH][RFC] OMAP4: I2C : I2C context save
[not found] ` <87k4blopaw.fsf-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
@ 2011-07-13 21:27 ` Hilman, Kevin
2011-07-14 10:53 ` Shubhrajyoti
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Hilman, Kevin @ 2011-07-13 21:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ben Dooks
Cc: Shubhrajyoti D, linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA,
linux-omap-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 2:15 PM, Kevin Hilman <khilman-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> Ben Dooks <ben-i2c-elnMNo+KYs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org> writes:
>
>> On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 02:50:46PM +0530, Shubhrajyoti D wrote:
>>> Currently the OMAP4 doesnot hit device off still the
>>> driver may have support for it.Adding support for the
>>> same.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Shubhrajyoti D <shubhrajyoti-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
>>
>> I guess since the previous set has been taken by Kevin
>> then these will be too.
>
> Sure, I'll pick these up, but it's probably to late for v3.1.
>
> We've already submitted the bulk of the OMAP stuff for v3.1.
I should've also said I'll pick these up when they are ready. There
are still some comments that need addressing.
Kevin
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH][RFC] OMAP4: I2C : I2C context save
2011-07-13 21:27 ` Hilman, Kevin
@ 2011-07-14 10:53 ` Shubhrajyoti
[not found] ` <4E1ECABA.7010306-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Shubhrajyoti @ 2011-07-14 10:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Hilman, Kevin; +Cc: Ben Dooks, linux-i2c, linux-omap
On Thursday 14 July 2011 02:57 AM, Hilman, Kevin wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 2:15 PM, Kevin Hilman<khilman@ti.com> wrote:
>> Ben Dooks<ben-i2c@fluff.org> writes:
>>
>>> On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 02:50:46PM +0530, Shubhrajyoti D wrote:
>>>> Currently the OMAP4 doesnot hit device off still the
>>>> driver may have support for it.Adding support for the
>>>> same.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Shubhrajyoti D<shubhrajyoti@ti.com>
>>> I guess since the previous set has been taken by Kevin
>>> then these will be too.
>> Sure, I'll pick these up, but it's probably to late for v3.1.
>>
>> We've already submitted the bulk of the OMAP stuff for v3.1.
Kevin in the folowing I tried taking the comments do do have any
further comments or suggestions.
http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-i2c/msg05823.html
> I should've also said I'll pick these up when they are ready. There
> are still some comments that need addressing.
>
> Kevin
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH][RFC] OMAP4: I2C : I2C context save
[not found] ` <4E1ECABA.7010306-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
@ 2011-07-14 15:38 ` Kevin Hilman
0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Kevin Hilman @ 2011-07-14 15:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Shubhrajyoti
Cc: Ben Dooks, linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA,
linux-omap-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA
Shubhrajyoti <shubhrajyoti-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org> writes:
> On Thursday 14 July 2011 02:57 AM, Hilman, Kevin wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 2:15 PM, Kevin Hilman<khilman-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>>> Ben Dooks<ben-i2c-elnMNo+KYs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org> writes:
>>>
>>>> On Tue, Jul 05, 2011 at 02:50:46PM +0530, Shubhrajyoti D wrote:
>>>>> Currently the OMAP4 doesnot hit device off still the
>>>>> driver may have support for it.Adding support for the
>>>>> same.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Shubhrajyoti D<shubhrajyoti-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
>>>> I guess since the previous set has been taken by Kevin
>>>> then these will be too.
>>> Sure, I'll pick these up, but it's probably to late for v3.1.
>>>
>>> We've already submitted the bulk of the OMAP stuff for v3.1.
> Kevin in the folowing I tried taking the comments do do have any
> further comments or suggestions.
>
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-i2c/msg05823.html
Sorry, my ti.com email got unsubscribed from vger lists for a couple
days around July 5 & 6, so I missed that one.
It's always best to directly Cc people you are expecting to get review
comments from.
I'll reply to your updated one shortly.
Kevin
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH][RFC] OMAP4: I2C : I2C context save
[not found] ` <87y60cr344.fsf-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
@ 2011-07-06 6:21 ` Shubhrajyoti
0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Shubhrajyoti @ 2011-07-06 6:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kevin Hilman
Cc: linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA,
ben-linux-elnMNo+KYs3YtjvyW6yDsg,
andy.green-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A,
linux-omap-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA
On Wednesday 06 July 2011 12:01 AM, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> Shubhrajyoti<shubhrajyoti-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org> writes:
>
>> On Monday 20 June 2011 09:05 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote:
>>> shubhrajyoti-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org writes:
>>>
>>>> From: Shubhrajyoti D<shubhrajyoti-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
>>>>
>>>> Currently the OMAP4 doesnot hit device off still the
>>>> driver may have support for it.Adding support for the
>>>> same.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Shubhrajyoti D<shubhrajyoti-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
>>> Please Cc linux-omap as this change to the hwmod data would go through
>>> Tony.
>> Yes , missed out.
>>> Also, please describe why this hwmod data change affects the problem
>>> described in the changelog.
>>>
>> After Andy's patch set
>> <code snippet>
>> static void omap_i2c_unidle(struct omap_i2c_dev *dev)
>> {
>> <snip>
>>
>> pm_runtime_get_sync(&pdev->dev);
>>
>> if (pdata->flags& OMAP_I2C_FLAG_RESET_REGS_POSTIDLE) {
>> omap_i2c_write_reg(dev, OMAP_I2C_CON_REG, 0);
>> omap_i2c_write_reg(dev, OMAP_I2C_PSC_REG, dev->pscstate);
>> omap_i2c_write_reg(dev, OMAP_I2C_SCLL_REG, dev->scllstate);
>> omap_i2c_write_reg(dev, OMAP_I2C_SCLH_REG, dev->sclhstate);
>> omap_i2c_write_reg(dev, OMAP_I2C_BUF_REG, dev->bufstate);
>> omap_i2c_write_reg(dev, OMAP_I2C_SYSC_REG, dev->syscstate);
>> omap_i2c_write_reg(dev, OMAP_I2C_WE_REG, dev->westate);
>> omap_i2c_write_reg(dev, OMAP_I2C_CON_REG, OMAP_I2C_CON_EN);
>> }
>> dev->idle = 0;
>>
>> This is dependent on the flag, I am making it true for OMAP4 also.
> What I meant was: please describe this in the changelog. Without more
> detail, the hwmod change itself is not understandable.
Yes , will explain it in the change logs.
> Kevin
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH][RFC] OMAP4: I2C : I2C context save
[not found] ` <4DFF6A9E.5050209-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
@ 2011-07-05 18:31 ` Kevin Hilman
[not found] ` <87y60cr344.fsf-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Kevin Hilman @ 2011-07-05 18:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Shubhrajyoti
Cc: linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA,
ben-linux-elnMNo+KYs3YtjvyW6yDsg,
andy.green-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A,
linux-omap-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA
Shubhrajyoti <shubhrajyoti-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org> writes:
> On Monday 20 June 2011 09:05 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote:
>> shubhrajyoti-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org writes:
>>
>>> From: Shubhrajyoti D<shubhrajyoti-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
>>>
>>> Currently the OMAP4 doesnot hit device off still the
>>> driver may have support for it.Adding support for the
>>> same.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Shubhrajyoti D<shubhrajyoti-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
>> Please Cc linux-omap as this change to the hwmod data would go through
>> Tony.
> Yes , missed out.
>> Also, please describe why this hwmod data change affects the problem
>> described in the changelog.
>>
> After Andy's patch set
> <code snippet>
> static void omap_i2c_unidle(struct omap_i2c_dev *dev)
> {
> <snip>
>
> pm_runtime_get_sync(&pdev->dev);
>
> if (pdata->flags & OMAP_I2C_FLAG_RESET_REGS_POSTIDLE) {
> omap_i2c_write_reg(dev, OMAP_I2C_CON_REG, 0);
> omap_i2c_write_reg(dev, OMAP_I2C_PSC_REG, dev->pscstate);
> omap_i2c_write_reg(dev, OMAP_I2C_SCLL_REG, dev->scllstate);
> omap_i2c_write_reg(dev, OMAP_I2C_SCLH_REG, dev->sclhstate);
> omap_i2c_write_reg(dev, OMAP_I2C_BUF_REG, dev->bufstate);
> omap_i2c_write_reg(dev, OMAP_I2C_SYSC_REG, dev->syscstate);
> omap_i2c_write_reg(dev, OMAP_I2C_WE_REG, dev->westate);
> omap_i2c_write_reg(dev, OMAP_I2C_CON_REG, OMAP_I2C_CON_EN);
> }
> dev->idle = 0;
>
> This is dependent on the flag, I am making it true for OMAP4 also.
What I meant was: please describe this in the changelog. Without more
detail, the hwmod change itself is not understandable.
Kevin
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH][RFC] OMAP4: I2C : I2C context save
[not found] ` <87ips08qis.fsf-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
@ 2011-06-20 15:43 ` Shubhrajyoti
[not found] ` <4DFF6A9E.5050209-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Shubhrajyoti @ 2011-06-20 15:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kevin Hilman
Cc: linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA,
ben-linux-elnMNo+KYs3YtjvyW6yDsg,
andy.green-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A,
linux-omap-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA
On Monday 20 June 2011 09:05 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> shubhrajyoti-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org writes:
>
>> From: Shubhrajyoti D<shubhrajyoti-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
>>
>> Currently the OMAP4 doesnot hit device off still the
>> driver may have support for it.Adding support for the
>> same.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Shubhrajyoti D<shubhrajyoti-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
> Please Cc linux-omap as this change to the hwmod data would go through
> Tony.
Yes , missed out.
> Also, please describe why this hwmod data change affects the problem
> described in the changelog.
>
After Andy's patch set
<code snippet>
static void omap_i2c_unidle(struct omap_i2c_dev *dev)
{
<snip>
pm_runtime_get_sync(&pdev->dev);
if (pdata->flags & OMAP_I2C_FLAG_RESET_REGS_POSTIDLE) {
omap_i2c_write_reg(dev, OMAP_I2C_CON_REG, 0);
omap_i2c_write_reg(dev, OMAP_I2C_PSC_REG, dev->pscstate);
omap_i2c_write_reg(dev, OMAP_I2C_SCLL_REG, dev->scllstate);
omap_i2c_write_reg(dev, OMAP_I2C_SCLH_REG, dev->sclhstate);
omap_i2c_write_reg(dev, OMAP_I2C_BUF_REG, dev->bufstate);
omap_i2c_write_reg(dev, OMAP_I2C_SYSC_REG, dev->syscstate);
omap_i2c_write_reg(dev, OMAP_I2C_WE_REG, dev->westate);
omap_i2c_write_reg(dev, OMAP_I2C_CON_REG, OMAP_I2C_CON_EN);
}
dev->idle = 0;
This is dependent on the flag, I am making it true for OMAP4 also.
> Kevin
>
>> ---
>> Applies on top of patches from Andy Green
>> http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-i2c/msg05632.html
>>
>> arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod_44xx_data.c | 3 ++-
>> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod_44xx_data.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod_44xx_data.c
>> index 0fe9556..5e2c748 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod_44xx_data.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod_44xx_data.c
>> @@ -2130,7 +2130,8 @@ static struct omap_hwmod_class omap44xx_i2c_hwmod_class = {
>> };
>>
>> static struct omap_i2c_dev_attr i2c_dev_attr = {
>> - .flags = OMAP_I2C_FLAG_BUS_SHIFT_NONE,
>> + .flags = OMAP_I2C_FLAG_BUS_SHIFT_NONE |
>> + OMAP_I2C_FLAG_RESET_REGS_POSTIDLE,
>> };
>>
>> /* i2c1 */
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH][RFC] OMAP4: I2C : I2C context save
[not found] ` <1308559552-24028-1-git-send-email-shubhrajyoti-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
@ 2011-06-20 15:35 ` Kevin Hilman
[not found] ` <87ips08qis.fsf-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Kevin Hilman @ 2011-06-20 15:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: shubhrajyoti-l0cyMroinI0
Cc: linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA,
ben-linux-elnMNo+KYs3YtjvyW6yDsg,
andy.green-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A
shubhrajyoti-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org writes:
> From: Shubhrajyoti D <shubhrajyoti-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
>
> Currently the OMAP4 doesnot hit device off still the
> driver may have support for it.Adding support for the
> same.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shubhrajyoti D <shubhrajyoti-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
Please Cc linux-omap as this change to the hwmod data would go through
Tony.
Also, please describe why this hwmod data change affects the problem
described in the changelog.
Kevin
> ---
> Applies on top of patches from Andy Green
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-i2c/msg05632.html
>
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod_44xx_data.c | 3 ++-
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod_44xx_data.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod_44xx_data.c
> index 0fe9556..5e2c748 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod_44xx_data.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod_44xx_data.c
> @@ -2130,7 +2130,8 @@ static struct omap_hwmod_class omap44xx_i2c_hwmod_class = {
> };
>
> static struct omap_i2c_dev_attr i2c_dev_attr = {
> - .flags = OMAP_I2C_FLAG_BUS_SHIFT_NONE,
> + .flags = OMAP_I2C_FLAG_BUS_SHIFT_NONE |
> + OMAP_I2C_FLAG_RESET_REGS_POSTIDLE,
> };
>
> /* i2c1 */
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [PATCH][RFC] OMAP4: I2C : I2C context save
@ 2011-06-20 8:45 shubhrajyoti-l0cyMroinI0
[not found] ` <1308559552-24028-1-git-send-email-shubhrajyoti-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: shubhrajyoti-l0cyMroinI0 @ 2011-06-20 8:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA
Cc: ben-linux-elnMNo+KYs3YtjvyW6yDsg,
andy.green-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A, khilman-l0cyMroinI0,
Shubhrajyoti D
From: Shubhrajyoti D <shubhrajyoti-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
Currently the OMAP4 doesnot hit device off still the
driver may have support for it.Adding support for the
same.
Signed-off-by: Shubhrajyoti D <shubhrajyoti-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
---
Applies on top of patches from Andy Green
http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-i2c/msg05632.html
arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod_44xx_data.c | 3 ++-
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod_44xx_data.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod_44xx_data.c
index 0fe9556..5e2c748 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod_44xx_data.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod_44xx_data.c
@@ -2130,7 +2130,8 @@ static struct omap_hwmod_class omap44xx_i2c_hwmod_class = {
};
static struct omap_i2c_dev_attr i2c_dev_attr = {
- .flags = OMAP_I2C_FLAG_BUS_SHIFT_NONE,
+ .flags = OMAP_I2C_FLAG_BUS_SHIFT_NONE |
+ OMAP_I2C_FLAG_RESET_REGS_POSTIDLE,
};
/* i2c1 */
--
1.7.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-07-14 15:38 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-07-05 9:20 [PATCH][RFC] OMAP4: I2C : I2C context save Shubhrajyoti D
[not found] ` <1309857646-29401-1-git-send-email-shubhrajyoti-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
2011-07-13 19:07 ` Ben Dooks
2011-07-13 21:15 ` Kevin Hilman
[not found] ` <87k4blopaw.fsf-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
2011-07-13 21:27 ` Hilman, Kevin
2011-07-14 10:53 ` Shubhrajyoti
[not found] ` <4E1ECABA.7010306-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
2011-07-14 15:38 ` Kevin Hilman
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-06-20 8:45 shubhrajyoti-l0cyMroinI0
[not found] ` <1308559552-24028-1-git-send-email-shubhrajyoti-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
2011-06-20 15:35 ` Kevin Hilman
[not found] ` <87ips08qis.fsf-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
2011-06-20 15:43 ` Shubhrajyoti
[not found] ` <4DFF6A9E.5050209-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
2011-07-05 18:31 ` Kevin Hilman
[not found] ` <87y60cr344.fsf-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
2011-07-06 6:21 ` Shubhrajyoti
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.