* Naming Conventions for Branches
@ 2011-07-12 18:24 thaddeus
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: thaddeus @ 2011-07-12 18:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: git
Is it common to have a different name for each branch, descriptive of the
project is contains or is it more common to have one dedicated name (for
instance QA2) for the branch on which projects change based on need.
Best
--
View this message in context: http://git.661346.n2.nabble.com/Naming-Conventions-for-Branches-tp6576242p6576242.html
Sent from the git mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2011-07-12 18:24 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-07-12 18:24 Naming Conventions for Branches thaddeus
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.