[U-Boot] [PATCH 0/9] Integrator patches

[U-Boot] [PATCH 0/9] Integrator patches

[Linus Walleij]

Reposting the entire series since I changed the Subject: on
[3/9] and [4/9] and removed one TAB character in [6/9]. Easiest
way to avoid the mess...

Linus Walleij (9):
  MAINTAINERS: integrator+versatile boards
  integratorap: make the compile work again
  integratorap: support relocation
  integratorap: support the hush shell
  integratorap: support some rudimentary commands
  integratorap: fixup SDRAM memory size detection
  integratorap: remove hardcoded 32MB memory cmdline
  integratorcp: make the board compile
  integrator: convert to new build system

 MAINTAINERS                                 |   11 +-
 MAKEALL                                     |   22 ---
 Makefile                                    |   27 ----
 arch/arm/cpu/arm720t/cpu.c                  |    5 -
 board/armltd/integrator/integrator.c        |   15 +-
 board/armltd/integrator/lowlevel_init.S     |    2 +-
 board/armltd/integrator/split_by_variant.sh |  220 ---------------------------
 boards.cfg                                  |    8 +
 include/configs/integratorap.h              |   21 +++-
 include/configs/integratorcp.h              |    8 +
 10 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 290 deletions(-)
 delete mode 100755 board/armltd/integrator/split_by_variant.sh

-- 
1.7.6

[U-Boot] [PATCH 0/9] Integrator patches

[Albert ARIBAUD]

Hi Linus,

Le 23/07/2011 15:37, Linus Walleij a ?crit :
> Reposting the entire series since I changed the Subject: on
> [3/9] and [4/9] and removed one TAB character in [6/9]. Easiest
> way to avoid the mess...

... mess which still exists due to the fact that there's no history in 
the patch set, making it harder to cross-check what's changed between 
v3, v2 and v1 for each patch. :(

I'll need some time to go through the mailing list and patchwork to 
check the patch set history.

Amicalement,
-- 
Albert.

[U-Boot] [PATCH 0/9] Integrator patches

[Linus Walleij]

On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 3:46 PM, Albert ARIBAUD
<albert.u.boot@aribaud.net> wrote:

>> Reposting the entire series since I changed the Subject: on
>> [3/9] and [4/9] and removed one TAB character in [6/9]. Easiest
>> way to avoid the mess...
>
> ... mess which still exists due to the fact that there's no history in the
> patch set, making it harder to cross-check what's changed between v3, v2 and
> v1 for each patch. :(

It does, the paragraph just above your statement is the history, i.e. everything
that changes from the initial versions of patch [3/9], [4/9] and [6/9]. I didn't
change anything else, apart from putting v3 after the [PATCH N/M] Subject,
the rest is just reposts of the earlier versions.

If you don't care about some patches being renamed with Subject: integrator
to Subject: integratorap: you can use all the old versions apart from the
single one that is in the v3 series and changes the TAB character so this:

http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/105595/
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/104349/
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/104346/
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/104347/
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/104348/
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/106467/
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/104661/
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/105593/
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/106013/

Has the same semantic content and is just v1, v2 pathes
except for that one patch, 106467.

Thanks,
Linus Walleij