* prebuilt pacakages
@ 2011-08-04 14:42 Todd Cooper
2011-08-04 14:59 ` Richard Purdie
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Todd Cooper @ 2011-08-04 14:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: yocto
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 135 bytes --]
Is there any way to make Yocto try to get prebuilt packages from known repositories rather than trying to rebuild the world?
-Todd
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 319 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: prebuilt pacakages
2011-08-04 14:42 prebuilt pacakages Todd Cooper
@ 2011-08-04 14:59 ` Richard Purdie
2011-08-04 17:50 ` Todd Cooper
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Richard Purdie @ 2011-08-04 14:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Todd Cooper; +Cc: yocto
On Thu, 2011-08-04 at 07:42 -0700, Todd Cooper wrote:
> Is there any way to make Yocto try to get prebuilt packages from known
> repositories rather than trying to rebuild the world?
The system supports a cache of prebuilt objects in the form of the
sstate data to accelerate build times if nothing changes. It doesn't
directly support using prebuilt packages directly though as its a much
harder problem to solve than you first realise.
A an example, given a package feed, its very hard to work out library
provision within that package feed or dependency naming.
Cheers,
Richard
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: prebuilt pacakages
2011-08-04 14:59 ` Richard Purdie
@ 2011-08-04 17:50 ` Todd Cooper
2011-08-04 22:43 ` Richard Purdie
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Todd Cooper @ 2011-08-04 17:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Richard Purdie; +Cc: yocto
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1066 bytes --]
Would this be worth putting on the list of items wished for in the future?
It sounds like the problem is difficult, but not impossible.
>________________________________
>From: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
>To: Todd Cooper <todd_cooper@yahoo.com>
>Cc: "yocto@yoctoproject.org" <yocto@yoctoproject.org>
>Sent: Thursday, August 4, 2011 10:59 AM
>Subject: Re: [yocto] prebuilt pacakages
>
>On Thu, 2011-08-04 at 07:42 -0700, Todd Cooper wrote:
>> Is there any way to make Yocto try to get prebuilt packages from known
>> repositories rather than trying to rebuild the world?
>
>The system supports a cache of prebuilt objects in the form of the
>sstate data to accelerate build times if nothing changes. It doesn't
>directly support using prebuilt packages directly though as its a much
>harder problem to solve than you first realise.
>
>A an example, given a package feed, its very hard to work out library
>provision within that package feed or dependency naming.
>
>Cheers,
>
>Richard
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1865 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: prebuilt pacakages
2011-08-04 17:50 ` Todd Cooper
@ 2011-08-04 22:43 ` Richard Purdie
2011-08-05 1:37 ` Todd Cooper
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Richard Purdie @ 2011-08-04 22:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Todd Cooper; +Cc: yocto
On Thu, 2011-08-04 at 10:50 -0700, Todd Cooper wrote:
> Would this be worth putting on the list of items wished for in the
> future?
>
> It sounds like the problem is difficult, but not impossible.
Most things are possible :).
The implementation isn't hard, maintaining some kind of translation
table for the dependencies, shared library provision lists and so on is
a *lot* of work though.
It would really take someone with a specific use case to step forward
along with manpower for it to have a chance of happening. Even then it
would work for a specific set of packages and wouldn't translate to any
other package feed.
Cheers,
Richard
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> From: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
> To: Todd Cooper <todd_cooper@yahoo.com>
> Cc: "yocto@yoctoproject.org" <yocto@yoctoproject.org>
> Sent: Thursday, August 4, 2011 10:59 AM
> Subject: Re: [yocto] prebuilt pacakages
>
> On Thu, 2011-08-04 at 07:42 -0700, Todd Cooper wrote:
> > Is there any way to make Yocto try to get prebuilt packages
> from known
> > repositories rather than trying to rebuild the world?
>
> The system supports a cache of prebuilt objects in the form of
> the
> sstate data to accelerate build times if nothing changes. It
> doesn't
> directly support using prebuilt packages directly though as
> its a much
> harder problem to solve than you first realise.
>
> A an example, given a package feed, its very hard to work out
> library
> provision within that package feed or dependency naming.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Richard
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: prebuilt pacakages
2011-08-04 22:43 ` Richard Purdie
@ 2011-08-05 1:37 ` Todd Cooper
2011-08-05 8:13 ` Richard Purdie
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Todd Cooper @ 2011-08-05 1:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Richard Purdie; +Cc: "yocto@yoctoproject.org"
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2383 bytes --]
Can I suggest that Yocto put it on the futures list, but with a lower priority?
>________________________________
>From: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
>To: Todd Cooper <todd_cooper@yahoo.com>
>Cc: "yocto@yoctoproject.org" <yocto@yoctoproject.org>
>Sent: Thursday, August 4, 2011 6:43 PM
>Subject: Re: [yocto] prebuilt pacakages
>
>On Thu, 2011-08-04 at 10:50 -0700, Todd Cooper wrote:
>> Would this be worth putting on the list of items wished for in the
>> future?
>>
>> It sounds like the problem is difficult, but not impossible.
>
>Most things are possible :).
>
>The implementation isn't hard, maintaining some kind of translation
>table for the dependencies, shared library provision lists and so on is
>a *lot* of work though.
>
>It would really take someone with a specific use case to step forward
>along with manpower for it to have a chance of happening. Even then it
>would work for a specific set of packages and wouldn't translate to any
>other package feed.
>
>Cheers,
>
>Richard
>
>>
>>
>> ______________________________________________________________
>> From: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
>> To: Todd Cooper <todd_cooper@yahoo.com>
>> Cc: "yocto@yoctoproject.org" <yocto@yoctoproject.org>
>> Sent: Thursday, August 4, 2011 10:59 AM
>> Subject: Re: [yocto] prebuilt pacakages
>>
>> On Thu, 2011-08-04 at 07:42 -0700, Todd Cooper wrote:
>> > Is there any way to make Yocto try to get prebuilt packages
>> from known
>> > repositories rather than trying to rebuild the world?
>>
>> The system supports a cache of prebuilt objects in the form of
>> the
>> sstate data to accelerate build times if nothing changes. It
>> doesn't
>> directly support using prebuilt packages directly though as
>> its a much
>> harder problem to solve than you first realise.
>>
>> A an example, given a package feed, its very hard to work out
>> library
>> provision within that package feed or dependency naming.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Richard
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 4418 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: prebuilt pacakages
2011-08-05 1:37 ` Todd Cooper
@ 2011-08-05 8:13 ` Richard Purdie
2011-08-05 15:18 ` Ourada, Paul
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Richard Purdie @ 2011-08-05 8:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Todd Cooper; +Cc: "yocto@yoctoproject.org"
On Thu, 2011-08-04 at 18:37 -0700, Todd Cooper wrote:
> Can I suggest that Yocto put it on the futures list, but with a lower
> priority?
You can add it to the list on the wiki.
Which known set of prebuilt packages are you thinking we should be able
to build against?
Cheers,
Richard
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: prebuilt pacakages
2011-08-05 8:13 ` Richard Purdie
@ 2011-08-05 15:18 ` Ourada, Paul
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Ourada, Paul @ 2011-08-05 15:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Richard Purdie, Todd Cooper; +Cc: "yocto@yoctoproject.org"
I'm no expert, but would the use of something like Puppet make this job a lot easier? A consultant is suggesting that we consider that tool for this purpose. Define a particular set of packages in Puppet, and you can play around in your sandbox to your heart's content. When you want to get back to a particular configuration, let Puppet do that for you. It may be a little heavyweight for some projects, but I'd think that any project which needs stricter control could use this.
http://www.puppetlabs.com
Paul E. Ourada
Sr. Principal Software Engineer
Covidien, Energy-based Devices
5920 Longbow Drive
Boulder, CO 80301
paul.ourada@covidien.com
www.covidien.com
Main: 303-530-2300
Ofc: 303-581-6940
Fax: 303-581-6741
-----Original Message-----
From: yocto-bounces@yoctoproject.org [mailto:yocto-bounces@yoctoproject.org] On Behalf Of Richard Purdie
Sent: Friday, August 05, 2011 2:13 AM
To: Todd Cooper
Cc: "yocto@yoctoproject.org"
Subject: Re: [yocto] prebuilt pacakages
On Thu, 2011-08-04 at 18:37 -0700, Todd Cooper wrote:
> Can I suggest that Yocto put it on the futures list, but with a lower
> priority?
You can add it to the list on the wiki.
Which known set of prebuilt packages are you thinking we should be able
to build against?
Cheers,
Richard
_______________________________________________
yocto mailing list
yocto@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-08-05 15:18 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-08-04 14:42 prebuilt pacakages Todd Cooper
2011-08-04 14:59 ` Richard Purdie
2011-08-04 17:50 ` Todd Cooper
2011-08-04 22:43 ` Richard Purdie
2011-08-05 1:37 ` Todd Cooper
2011-08-05 8:13 ` Richard Purdie
2011-08-05 15:18 ` Ourada, Paul
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.