From: Alex Elder <aelder@sgi.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/11] xfs: remove i_iocount
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2011 14:22:56 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1314904976.2903.70.camel@doink> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110823082913.833897866@bombadil.infradead.org>
On Tue, 2011-08-23 at 04:28 -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> We now have an i_dio_count filed and surrounding infrastructure to wait
> for direct I/O completion instead of i_icount, and we have never needed
> to iocount waits for buffered I/O given that we only set the page uptodate
> after finishing all required work. Thus remove i_iocount, and replace
> the actually needed waits with calls to inode_dio_wait.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Looks good.
Reviewed-by: Alex Elder <aelder@sgi.com>
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-09-01 19:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-08-23 8:28 [PATCH 00/11] patch queue for Linux 3.2 Christoph Hellwig
2011-08-23 8:28 ` [PATCH 01/11] xfs: remove delwri buffer handling from xfs_buf_iorequest Christoph Hellwig
2011-09-01 19:21 ` Alex Elder
2011-08-23 8:28 ` [PATCH 02/11] xfs: remove the unlock argument to xfs_buf_delwri_queue Christoph Hellwig
2011-09-01 19:22 ` Alex Elder
2011-09-01 21:39 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-08-23 8:28 ` [PATCH 03/11] xfs: move more delwri setup into xfs_buf_delwri_queue Christoph Hellwig
2011-09-01 19:22 ` Alex Elder
2011-08-23 8:28 ` [PATCH 04/11] xfs: call xfs_buf_delwri_queue directly Christoph Hellwig
2011-09-01 19:22 ` Alex Elder
2011-09-01 21:46 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-09-02 0:17 ` Dave Chinner
2011-08-23 8:28 ` [PATCH 05/11] xfs: let xfs_bwrite callers handle the xfs_buf_relse Christoph Hellwig
2011-09-01 19:22 ` Alex Elder
2011-08-23 8:28 ` [PATCH 06/11] xfs: use the "delwri" terminology consistently Christoph Hellwig
2011-09-01 19:22 ` Alex Elder
2011-08-23 8:28 ` [PATCH 07/11] xfs: remove dead ENODEV handling in xfs_destroy_ioend Christoph Hellwig
2011-09-01 19:22 ` Alex Elder
2011-08-23 8:28 ` [PATCH 08/11] xfs: defer AIO/DIO completions Christoph Hellwig
2011-08-24 0:01 ` Dave Chinner
2011-09-01 19:22 ` Alex Elder
2011-08-23 8:28 ` [PATCH 09/11] xfs: reduce ioend latency Christoph Hellwig
2011-09-01 19:22 ` Alex Elder
2011-08-23 8:28 ` [PATCH 10/11] xfs: wait for I/O completion when writing out pages in xfs_setattr_size Christoph Hellwig
2011-09-01 19:22 ` Alex Elder
2011-08-23 8:28 ` [PATCH 11/11] xfs: remove i_iocount Christoph Hellwig
2011-09-01 19:22 ` Alex Elder [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1314904976.2903.70.camel@doink \
--to=aelder@sgi.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.