All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] dma/imx-sdma+imx-dma: explicitly #include <linux/module.h>
@ 2011-09-26  6:26 ` Uwe Kleine-König
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Uwe Kleine-König @ 2011-09-26  6:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Vinod Koul, Dan Williams
  Cc: linux-kernel, kernel, linux-arm-kernel, Paul Gortmaker

This is needed after commit

	include: replace linux/module.h with "struct module" wherever possible

(currently 25215aa in next).

Cc: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
---
Hello,

maybe it's sensible for Paul to take that before his commit?

Best regards
Uwe

 drivers/dma/imx-dma.c  |    1 +
 drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c |    1 +
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/dma/imx-dma.c b/drivers/dma/imx-dma.c
index d99f71c..3732de8 100644
--- a/drivers/dma/imx-dma.c
+++ b/drivers/dma/imx-dma.c
@@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
 #include <linux/slab.h>
 #include <linux/platform_device.h>
 #include <linux/dmaengine.h>
+#include <linux/module.h>
 
 #include <asm/irq.h>
 #include <mach/dma-v1.h>
diff --git a/drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c b/drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c
index b5cc27d..86fb6e5 100644
--- a/drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c
+++ b/drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c
@@ -34,6 +34,7 @@
 #include <linux/dmaengine.h>
 #include <linux/of.h>
 #include <linux/of_device.h>
+#include <linux/module.h>
 
 #include <asm/irq.h>
 #include <mach/sdma.h>
-- 
1.7.6.3


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] dma/imx-sdma+imx-dma: explicitly #include <linux/module.h>
@ 2011-09-26  6:26 ` Uwe Kleine-König
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Uwe Kleine-König @ 2011-09-26  6:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel

This is needed after commit

	include: replace linux/module.h with "struct module" wherever possible

(currently 25215aa in next).

Cc: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-K?nig <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
---
Hello,

maybe it's sensible for Paul to take that before his commit?

Best regards
Uwe

 drivers/dma/imx-dma.c  |    1 +
 drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c |    1 +
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/dma/imx-dma.c b/drivers/dma/imx-dma.c
index d99f71c..3732de8 100644
--- a/drivers/dma/imx-dma.c
+++ b/drivers/dma/imx-dma.c
@@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
 #include <linux/slab.h>
 #include <linux/platform_device.h>
 #include <linux/dmaengine.h>
+#include <linux/module.h>
 
 #include <asm/irq.h>
 #include <mach/dma-v1.h>
diff --git a/drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c b/drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c
index b5cc27d..86fb6e5 100644
--- a/drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c
+++ b/drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c
@@ -34,6 +34,7 @@
 #include <linux/dmaengine.h>
 #include <linux/of.h>
 #include <linux/of_device.h>
+#include <linux/module.h>
 
 #include <asm/irq.h>
 #include <mach/sdma.h>
-- 
1.7.6.3

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] dma/imx-sdma+imx-dma: explicitly #include <linux/module.h>
  2011-09-26  6:26 ` Uwe Kleine-König
@ 2011-09-27 22:03   ` Paul Gortmaker
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Paul Gortmaker @ 2011-09-27 22:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Uwe Kleine-König
  Cc: Vinod Koul, Dan Williams, linux-kernel, kernel, linux-arm-kernel

On 11-09-26 02:26 AM, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> This is needed after commit
> 
> 	include: replace linux/module.h with "struct module" wherever possible
> 
> (currently 25215aa in next).
> 
> Cc: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
> Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
> ---
> Hello,
> 
> maybe it's sensible for Paul to take that before his commit?

Thanks, I'll blend it into the commit adding module.h to the other
drivers/dma files.  It seems the imx boards don't have a defconfig
in the arch/arm/configs that enables this (CONFIG_IMX_[S]DMA).

What is really interesting (at least to me anyway) is that I
didn't get one iMX build in some 6000+ ARM randconfig builds....

I would have thought it would have showed up at least a couple
times, given that number of builds.  Maybe randconfig doesn't
deal so well with "choice" Kconfig items?

~/git/module.h/linux-2.6.git$ ls -1 ../build-10*arm |wc -l
6399
~/git/module.h/linux-2.6.git$ grep CONFIG_ARCH_[A-Z0-9]*=y ../build-10*arm*/.config | sed 's/.*CON/CON/'|sort |uniq
CONFIG_ARCH_EBSA110=y
CONFIG_ARCH_H7201=y
CONFIG_ARCH_H7202=y
CONFIG_ARCH_H720X=y
CONFIG_ARCH_VERSATILE=y
~/git/module.h/linux-2.6.git$ 

No ARCH_MXC, no ARCH_MXS, PXA, or any of the other 20+ variants.
Definitely not a random spread there, with all 6000 builds falling
in just 5 buckets.

Paul.


> 
> Best regards
> Uwe
> 
>  drivers/dma/imx-dma.c  |    1 +
>  drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c |    1 +
>  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/imx-dma.c b/drivers/dma/imx-dma.c
> index d99f71c..3732de8 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/imx-dma.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/imx-dma.c
> @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
>  #include <linux/slab.h>
>  #include <linux/platform_device.h>
>  #include <linux/dmaengine.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
>  
>  #include <asm/irq.h>
>  #include <mach/dma-v1.h>
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c b/drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c
> index b5cc27d..86fb6e5 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c
> @@ -34,6 +34,7 @@
>  #include <linux/dmaengine.h>
>  #include <linux/of.h>
>  #include <linux/of_device.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
>  
>  #include <asm/irq.h>
>  #include <mach/sdma.h>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] dma/imx-sdma+imx-dma: explicitly #include <linux/module.h>
@ 2011-09-27 22:03   ` Paul Gortmaker
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Paul Gortmaker @ 2011-09-27 22:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel

On 11-09-26 02:26 AM, Uwe Kleine-K?nig wrote:
> This is needed after commit
> 
> 	include: replace linux/module.h with "struct module" wherever possible
> 
> (currently 25215aa in next).
> 
> Cc: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
> Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-K?nig <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
> ---
> Hello,
> 
> maybe it's sensible for Paul to take that before his commit?

Thanks, I'll blend it into the commit adding module.h to the other
drivers/dma files.  It seems the imx boards don't have a defconfig
in the arch/arm/configs that enables this (CONFIG_IMX_[S]DMA).

What is really interesting (at least to me anyway) is that I
didn't get one iMX build in some 6000+ ARM randconfig builds....

I would have thought it would have showed up at least a couple
times, given that number of builds.  Maybe randconfig doesn't
deal so well with "choice" Kconfig items?

~/git/module.h/linux-2.6.git$ ls -1 ../build-10*arm |wc -l
6399
~/git/module.h/linux-2.6.git$ grep CONFIG_ARCH_[A-Z0-9]*=y ../build-10*arm*/.config | sed 's/.*CON/CON/'|sort |uniq
CONFIG_ARCH_EBSA110=y
CONFIG_ARCH_H7201=y
CONFIG_ARCH_H7202=y
CONFIG_ARCH_H720X=y
CONFIG_ARCH_VERSATILE=y
~/git/module.h/linux-2.6.git$ 

No ARCH_MXC, no ARCH_MXS, PXA, or any of the other 20+ variants.
Definitely not a random spread there, with all 6000 builds falling
in just 5 buckets.

Paul.


> 
> Best regards
> Uwe
> 
>  drivers/dma/imx-dma.c  |    1 +
>  drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c |    1 +
>  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/imx-dma.c b/drivers/dma/imx-dma.c
> index d99f71c..3732de8 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/imx-dma.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/imx-dma.c
> @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
>  #include <linux/slab.h>
>  #include <linux/platform_device.h>
>  #include <linux/dmaengine.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
>  
>  #include <asm/irq.h>
>  #include <mach/dma-v1.h>
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c b/drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c
> index b5cc27d..86fb6e5 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c
> @@ -34,6 +34,7 @@
>  #include <linux/dmaengine.h>
>  #include <linux/of.h>
>  #include <linux/of_device.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
>  
>  #include <asm/irq.h>
>  #include <mach/sdma.h>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] dma/imx-sdma+imx-dma: explicitly #include <linux/module.h>
  2011-09-27 22:03   ` Paul Gortmaker
@ 2011-09-28  3:49     ` Vinod Koul
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Vinod Koul @ 2011-09-28  3:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Paul Gortmaker
  Cc: Uwe Kleine-König, Dan Williams, linux-kernel, kernel,
	linux-arm-kernel

On Tue, 2011-09-27 at 18:03 -0400, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
> On 11-09-26 02:26 AM, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > This is needed after commit
> > 
> > 	include: replace linux/module.h with "struct module" wherever possible
> > 
> > (currently 25215aa in next).
> > 
> > Cc: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Acked-by Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>

> > ---
> > Hello,
> > 
> > maybe it's sensible for Paul to take that before his commit?
> 
> Thanks, I'll blend it into the commit adding module.h to the other
> drivers/dma files.  It seems the imx boards don't have a defconfig
> in the arch/arm/configs that enables this (CONFIG_IMX_[S]DMA).
You can find imx_v4_v5_defconfig in linux-next tree.

> 
> What is really interesting (at least to me anyway) is that I
> didn't get one iMX build in some 6000+ ARM randconfig builds....
> 
> I would have thought it would have showed up at least a couple
> times, given that number of builds.  Maybe randconfig doesn't
> deal so well with "choice" Kconfig items?
> 
> ~/git/module.h/linux-2.6.git$ ls -1 ../build-10*arm |wc -l
> 6399
> ~/git/module.h/linux-2.6.git$ grep CONFIG_ARCH_[A-Z0-9]*=y ../build-10*arm*/.config | sed 's/.*CON/CON/'|sort |uniq
> CONFIG_ARCH_EBSA110=y
> CONFIG_ARCH_H7201=y
> CONFIG_ARCH_H7202=y
> CONFIG_ARCH_H720X=y
> CONFIG_ARCH_VERSATILE=y
> ~/git/module.h/linux-2.6.git$ 
> 
> No ARCH_MXC, no ARCH_MXS, PXA, or any of the other 20+ variants.
> Definitely not a random spread there, with all 6000 builds falling
> in just 5 buckets.
> 
> Paul.
> 
> 
> > 
> > Best regards
> > Uwe
> > 
> >  drivers/dma/imx-dma.c  |    1 +
> >  drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c |    1 +
> >  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/dma/imx-dma.c b/drivers/dma/imx-dma.c
> > index d99f71c..3732de8 100644
> > --- a/drivers/dma/imx-dma.c
> > +++ b/drivers/dma/imx-dma.c
> > @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
> >  #include <linux/slab.h>
> >  #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> >  #include <linux/dmaengine.h>
> > +#include <linux/module.h>
> >  
> >  #include <asm/irq.h>
> >  #include <mach/dma-v1.h>
> > diff --git a/drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c b/drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c
> > index b5cc27d..86fb6e5 100644
> > --- a/drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c
> > +++ b/drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c
> > @@ -34,6 +34,7 @@
> >  #include <linux/dmaengine.h>
> >  #include <linux/of.h>
> >  #include <linux/of_device.h>
> > +#include <linux/module.h>
> >  
> >  #include <asm/irq.h>
> >  #include <mach/sdma.h>
-- 
~Vinod


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] dma/imx-sdma+imx-dma: explicitly #include <linux/module.h>
@ 2011-09-28  3:49     ` Vinod Koul
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Vinod Koul @ 2011-09-28  3:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel

On Tue, 2011-09-27 at 18:03 -0400, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
> On 11-09-26 02:26 AM, Uwe Kleine-K?nig wrote:
> > This is needed after commit
> > 
> > 	include: replace linux/module.h with "struct module" wherever possible
> > 
> > (currently 25215aa in next).
> > 
> > Cc: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-K?nig <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Acked-by Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>

> > ---
> > Hello,
> > 
> > maybe it's sensible for Paul to take that before his commit?
> 
> Thanks, I'll blend it into the commit adding module.h to the other
> drivers/dma files.  It seems the imx boards don't have a defconfig
> in the arch/arm/configs that enables this (CONFIG_IMX_[S]DMA).
You can find imx_v4_v5_defconfig in linux-next tree.

> 
> What is really interesting (at least to me anyway) is that I
> didn't get one iMX build in some 6000+ ARM randconfig builds....
> 
> I would have thought it would have showed up at least a couple
> times, given that number of builds.  Maybe randconfig doesn't
> deal so well with "choice" Kconfig items?
> 
> ~/git/module.h/linux-2.6.git$ ls -1 ../build-10*arm |wc -l
> 6399
> ~/git/module.h/linux-2.6.git$ grep CONFIG_ARCH_[A-Z0-9]*=y ../build-10*arm*/.config | sed 's/.*CON/CON/'|sort |uniq
> CONFIG_ARCH_EBSA110=y
> CONFIG_ARCH_H7201=y
> CONFIG_ARCH_H7202=y
> CONFIG_ARCH_H720X=y
> CONFIG_ARCH_VERSATILE=y
> ~/git/module.h/linux-2.6.git$ 
> 
> No ARCH_MXC, no ARCH_MXS, PXA, or any of the other 20+ variants.
> Definitely not a random spread there, with all 6000 builds falling
> in just 5 buckets.
> 
> Paul.
> 
> 
> > 
> > Best regards
> > Uwe
> > 
> >  drivers/dma/imx-dma.c  |    1 +
> >  drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c |    1 +
> >  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/dma/imx-dma.c b/drivers/dma/imx-dma.c
> > index d99f71c..3732de8 100644
> > --- a/drivers/dma/imx-dma.c
> > +++ b/drivers/dma/imx-dma.c
> > @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
> >  #include <linux/slab.h>
> >  #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> >  #include <linux/dmaengine.h>
> > +#include <linux/module.h>
> >  
> >  #include <asm/irq.h>
> >  #include <mach/dma-v1.h>
> > diff --git a/drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c b/drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c
> > index b5cc27d..86fb6e5 100644
> > --- a/drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c
> > +++ b/drivers/dma/imx-sdma.c
> > @@ -34,6 +34,7 @@
> >  #include <linux/dmaengine.h>
> >  #include <linux/of.h>
> >  #include <linux/of_device.h>
> > +#include <linux/module.h>
> >  
> >  #include <asm/irq.h>
> >  #include <mach/sdma.h>
-- 
~Vinod

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] dma/imx-sdma+imx-dma: explicitly #include <linux/module.h>
  2011-09-27 22:03   ` Paul Gortmaker
@ 2011-09-28  6:46     ` Uwe Kleine-König
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Uwe Kleine-König @ 2011-09-28  6:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Paul Gortmaker
  Cc: Vinod Koul, Dan Williams, linux-kernel, kernel, linux-arm-kernel,
	linux-kbuild, Michal Marek

[Cc: += linux-kbuild@v.k.o + Michal Marek]

Hello,

On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 06:03:13PM -0400, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
> On 11-09-26 02:26 AM, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > This is needed after commit
> > 
> > 	include: replace linux/module.h with "struct module" wherever possible
> > 
> > (currently 25215aa in next).
> > 
> > Cc: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
> > ---
> > Hello,
> > 
> > maybe it's sensible for Paul to take that before his commit?
> 
> Thanks, I'll blend it into the commit adding module.h to the other
> drivers/dma files.  It seems the imx boards don't have a defconfig
> in the arch/arm/configs that enables this (CONFIG_IMX_[S]DMA).
> 
> What is really interesting (at least to me anyway) is that I
> didn't get one iMX build in some 6000+ ARM randconfig builds....
> 
> I would have thought it would have showed up at least a couple
> times, given that number of builds.  Maybe randconfig doesn't
> deal so well with "choice" Kconfig items?
> 
> ~/git/module.h/linux-2.6.git$ ls -1 ../build-10*arm |wc -l
> 6399
> ~/git/module.h/linux-2.6.git$ grep CONFIG_ARCH_[A-Z0-9]*=y ../build-10*arm*/.config | sed 's/.*CON/CON/'|sort |uniq
> CONFIG_ARCH_EBSA110=y
> CONFIG_ARCH_H7201=y
> CONFIG_ARCH_H7202=y
> CONFIG_ARCH_H720X=y
> CONFIG_ARCH_VERSATILE=y

I don't understand why you did that sed, but AFAICT it doesn't hurt,
too. Maybe adding -c to uniq in your command line is interesting for the
kbuild people?!

> ~/git/module.h/linux-2.6.git$ 
> 
> No ARCH_MXC, no ARCH_MXS, PXA, or any of the other 20+ variants.
> Definitely not a random spread there, with all 6000 builds falling
> in just 5 buckets.
How did you test? Generate a .config, test without your change and if
that succeeds test with it? If so, maybe the problem isn't that
randconfig doesn't generate more random configs but that you got many
failures in the first run?!

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] dma/imx-sdma+imx-dma: explicitly #include <linux/module.h>
@ 2011-09-28  6:46     ` Uwe Kleine-König
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Uwe Kleine-König @ 2011-09-28  6:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel

[Cc: += linux-kbuild at v.k.o + Michal Marek]

Hello,

On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 06:03:13PM -0400, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
> On 11-09-26 02:26 AM, Uwe Kleine-K?nig wrote:
> > This is needed after commit
> > 
> > 	include: replace linux/module.h with "struct module" wherever possible
> > 
> > (currently 25215aa in next).
> > 
> > Cc: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-K?nig <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
> > ---
> > Hello,
> > 
> > maybe it's sensible for Paul to take that before his commit?
> 
> Thanks, I'll blend it into the commit adding module.h to the other
> drivers/dma files.  It seems the imx boards don't have a defconfig
> in the arch/arm/configs that enables this (CONFIG_IMX_[S]DMA).
> 
> What is really interesting (at least to me anyway) is that I
> didn't get one iMX build in some 6000+ ARM randconfig builds....
> 
> I would have thought it would have showed up at least a couple
> times, given that number of builds.  Maybe randconfig doesn't
> deal so well with "choice" Kconfig items?
> 
> ~/git/module.h/linux-2.6.git$ ls -1 ../build-10*arm |wc -l
> 6399
> ~/git/module.h/linux-2.6.git$ grep CONFIG_ARCH_[A-Z0-9]*=y ../build-10*arm*/.config | sed 's/.*CON/CON/'|sort |uniq
> CONFIG_ARCH_EBSA110=y
> CONFIG_ARCH_H7201=y
> CONFIG_ARCH_H7202=y
> CONFIG_ARCH_H720X=y
> CONFIG_ARCH_VERSATILE=y

I don't understand why you did that sed, but AFAICT it doesn't hurt,
too. Maybe adding -c to uniq in your command line is interesting for the
kbuild people?!

> ~/git/module.h/linux-2.6.git$ 
> 
> No ARCH_MXC, no ARCH_MXS, PXA, or any of the other 20+ variants.
> Definitely not a random spread there, with all 6000 builds falling
> in just 5 buckets.
How did you test? Generate a .config, test without your change and if
that succeeds test with it? If so, maybe the problem isn't that
randconfig doesn't generate more random configs but that you got many
failures in the first run?!

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-K?nig            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] dma/imx-sdma+imx-dma: explicitly #include <linux/module.h>
  2011-09-28  6:46     ` Uwe Kleine-König
@ 2011-09-28  7:34       ` Arnaud Lacombe
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Arnaud Lacombe @ 2011-09-28  7:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Uwe Kleine-König
  Cc: Paul Gortmaker, Vinod Koul, Dan Williams, linux-kernel, kernel,
	linux-arm-kernel, linux-kbuild, Michal Marek

Hi,

2011/9/28 Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>:
> [Cc: += linux-kbuild@v.k.o + Michal Marek]
>
> Hello,
>
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 06:03:13PM -0400, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
>> On 11-09-26 02:26 AM, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
>> > This is needed after commit
>> >
>> >     include: replace linux/module.h with "struct module" wherever possible
>> >
>> > (currently 25215aa in next).
>> >
>> > Cc: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
>> > Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
>> > ---
>> > Hello,
>> >
>> > maybe it's sensible for Paul to take that before his commit?
>>
>> Thanks, I'll blend it into the commit adding module.h to the other
>> drivers/dma files.  It seems the imx boards don't have a defconfig
>> in the arch/arm/configs that enables this (CONFIG_IMX_[S]DMA).
>>
>> What is really interesting (at least to me anyway) is that I
>> didn't get one iMX build in some 6000+ ARM randconfig builds....
>>
>> I would have thought it would have showed up at least a couple
>> times, given that number of builds.  Maybe randconfig doesn't
>> deal so well with "choice" Kconfig items?
>>
>> ~/git/module.h/linux-2.6.git$ ls -1 ../build-10*arm |wc -l
>> 6399
>> ~/git/module.h/linux-2.6.git$ grep CONFIG_ARCH_[A-Z0-9]*=y ../build-10*arm*/.config | sed 's/.*CON/CON/'|sort |uniq
>> CONFIG_ARCH_EBSA110=y
>> CONFIG_ARCH_H7201=y
>> CONFIG_ARCH_H7202=y
>> CONFIG_ARCH_H720X=y
>> CONFIG_ARCH_VERSATILE=y
>
> I don't understand why you did that sed, but AFAICT it doesn't hurt,
> too. Maybe adding -c to uniq in your command line is interesting for the
> kbuild people?!
>
this can be reproduced trivially:

for i in $(seq 1 100); do
    make ARCH=arm randconfig
    sed -e '/CONFIG_ARCH_INTEGRATOR/,/CONFIG_ARCH_ZYNQ/!d;' \
        -e '/=y/!d' .config >> arch_selected
done
sort arch_selected | uniq -c

I may have a trivial explanation for part of the symbol, which depends
on MMU, so if these symbols are selected, but MMU is not, it will
fall-back on the default, VERSATILE, which should happen 50% of the
time. However, there is plenty of symbols which have no specific
dependency, and are still not selected.

On the other side, all the result of a randconfig, on the choice alone
(ie. without any 'select' and any other symbols) is spread
"correctly".

Taken as a whole:

% cat arch_selected | sort | uniq -c | wc -l
     3

% cat arch_selected | sort | uniq -c
      2 CONFIG_ARCH_EBSA110=y
      4 CONFIG_ARCH_H720X=y
    100 CONFIG_ARCH_VERSATILE=y

However, when the choice is alone:

% cat arch_selected | sort | uniq -c | wc -l
     39

>> ~/git/module.h/linux-2.6.git$
>>
>> No ARCH_MXC, no ARCH_MXS, PXA, or any of the other 20+ variants.
>> Definitely not a random spread there, with all 6000 builds falling
>> in just 5 buckets.
> How did you test? Generate a .config, test without your change and if
> that succeeds test with it? If so, maybe the problem isn't that
> randconfig doesn't generate more random configs but that you got many
> failures in the first run?!
>
it would seem that taken globally, the result of this particular
choice is not random, but I'm not sure of the dynamic involved
precisely.

I'm not a huge fan of the way randconfig works presently, that it by
just iterating over all symbols and setting a value . I'd prefer to
keep traversing all the menu, picking a random value for
user-changeable setting, over and over until all symbol have been
chosen. However, this is a whole lots of change...

 - Arnaud

> Best regards
> Uwe
>
> --
> Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
> Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] dma/imx-sdma+imx-dma: explicitly #include <linux/module.h>
@ 2011-09-28  7:34       ` Arnaud Lacombe
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Arnaud Lacombe @ 2011-09-28  7:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel

Hi,

2011/9/28 Uwe Kleine-K?nig <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>:
> [Cc: += linux-kbuild at v.k.o + Michal Marek]
>
> Hello,
>
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 06:03:13PM -0400, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
>> On 11-09-26 02:26 AM, Uwe Kleine-K?nig wrote:
>> > This is needed after commit
>> >
>> > ? ? include: replace linux/module.h with "struct module" wherever possible
>> >
>> > (currently 25215aa in next).
>> >
>> > Cc: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
>> > Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-K?nig <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
>> > ---
>> > Hello,
>> >
>> > maybe it's sensible for Paul to take that before his commit?
>>
>> Thanks, I'll blend it into the commit adding module.h to the other
>> drivers/dma files. ?It seems the imx boards don't have a defconfig
>> in the arch/arm/configs that enables this (CONFIG_IMX_[S]DMA).
>>
>> What is really interesting (at least to me anyway) is that I
>> didn't get one iMX build in some 6000+ ARM randconfig builds....
>>
>> I would have thought it would have showed up at least a couple
>> times, given that number of builds. ?Maybe randconfig doesn't
>> deal so well with "choice" Kconfig items?
>>
>> ~/git/module.h/linux-2.6.git$ ls -1 ../build-10*arm |wc -l
>> 6399
>> ~/git/module.h/linux-2.6.git$ grep CONFIG_ARCH_[A-Z0-9]*=y ../build-10*arm*/.config | sed 's/.*CON/CON/'|sort |uniq
>> CONFIG_ARCH_EBSA110=y
>> CONFIG_ARCH_H7201=y
>> CONFIG_ARCH_H7202=y
>> CONFIG_ARCH_H720X=y
>> CONFIG_ARCH_VERSATILE=y
>
> I don't understand why you did that sed, but AFAICT it doesn't hurt,
> too. Maybe adding -c to uniq in your command line is interesting for the
> kbuild people?!
>
this can be reproduced trivially:

for i in $(seq 1 100); do
    make ARCH=arm randconfig
    sed -e '/CONFIG_ARCH_INTEGRATOR/,/CONFIG_ARCH_ZYNQ/!d;' \
        -e '/=y/!d' .config >> arch_selected
done
sort arch_selected | uniq -c

I may have a trivial explanation for part of the symbol, which depends
on MMU, so if these symbols are selected, but MMU is not, it will
fall-back on the default, VERSATILE, which should happen 50% of the
time. However, there is plenty of symbols which have no specific
dependency, and are still not selected.

On the other side, all the result of a randconfig, on the choice alone
(ie. without any 'select' and any other symbols) is spread
"correctly".

Taken as a whole:

% cat arch_selected | sort | uniq -c | wc -l
     3

% cat arch_selected | sort | uniq -c
      2 CONFIG_ARCH_EBSA110=y
      4 CONFIG_ARCH_H720X=y
    100 CONFIG_ARCH_VERSATILE=y

However, when the choice is alone:

% cat arch_selected | sort | uniq -c | wc -l
     39

>> ~/git/module.h/linux-2.6.git$
>>
>> No ARCH_MXC, no ARCH_MXS, PXA, or any of the other 20+ variants.
>> Definitely not a random spread there, with all 6000 builds falling
>> in just 5 buckets.
> How did you test? Generate a .config, test without your change and if
> that succeeds test with it? If so, maybe the problem isn't that
> randconfig doesn't generate more random configs but that you got many
> failures in the first run?!
>
it would seem that taken globally, the result of this particular
choice is not random, but I'm not sure of the dynamic involved
precisely.

I'm not a huge fan of the way randconfig works presently, that it by
just iterating over all symbols and setting a value . I'd prefer to
keep traversing all the menu, picking a random value for
user-changeable setting, over and over until all symbol have been
chosen. However, this is a whole lots of change...

 - Arnaud

> Best regards
> Uwe
>
> --
> Pengutronix e.K. ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? | Uwe Kleine-K?nig ? ? ? ? ? ?|
> Industrial Linux Solutions ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? | http://www.pengutronix.de/ ?|
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at ?http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at ?http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] dma/imx-sdma+imx-dma: explicitly #include <linux/module.h>
  2011-09-28  6:46     ` Uwe Kleine-König
  (?)
@ 2011-09-28 13:36       ` Paul Gortmaker
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Paul Gortmaker @ 2011-09-28 13:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Uwe Kleine-König
  Cc: Vinod Koul, Dan Williams, linux-kernel, kernel, linux-arm-kernel,
	linux-kbuild, Michal Marek

On 11-09-28 02:46 AM, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> [Cc: += linux-kbuild@v.k.o + Michal Marek]
> 
> Hello,
> 
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 06:03:13PM -0400, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
>> On 11-09-26 02:26 AM, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
>>> This is needed after commit
>>>
>>> 	include: replace linux/module.h with "struct module" wherever possible
>>>
>>> (currently 25215aa in next).
>>>
>>> Cc: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
>>> ---
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> maybe it's sensible for Paul to take that before his commit?
>>
>> Thanks, I'll blend it into the commit adding module.h to the other
>> drivers/dma files.  It seems the imx boards don't have a defconfig
>> in the arch/arm/configs that enables this (CONFIG_IMX_[S]DMA).
>>
>> What is really interesting (at least to me anyway) is that I
>> didn't get one iMX build in some 6000+ ARM randconfig builds....
>>
>> I would have thought it would have showed up at least a couple
>> times, given that number of builds.  Maybe randconfig doesn't
>> deal so well with "choice" Kconfig items?
>>
>> ~/git/module.h/linux-2.6.git$ ls -1 ../build-10*arm |wc -l
>> 6399
>> ~/git/module.h/linux-2.6.git$ grep CONFIG_ARCH_[A-Z0-9]*=y ../build-10*arm*/.config | sed 's/.*CON/CON/'|sort |uniq
>> CONFIG_ARCH_EBSA110=y
>> CONFIG_ARCH_H7201=y
>> CONFIG_ARCH_H7202=y
>> CONFIG_ARCH_H720X=y
>> CONFIG_ARCH_VERSATILE=y
> 
> I don't understand why you did that sed, but AFAICT it doesn't hurt,
> too. Maybe adding -c to uniq in your command line is interesting for the
> kbuild people?!

The sed was to strip the build paths from the grep output.  I could
have used "grep -h" instead.

> 
>> ~/git/module.h/linux-2.6.git$ 
>>
>> No ARCH_MXC, no ARCH_MXS, PXA, or any of the other 20+ variants.
>> Definitely not a random spread there, with all 6000 builds falling
>> in just 5 buckets.
> How did you test? Generate a .config, test without your change and if
> that succeeds test with it? If so, maybe the problem isn't that
> randconfig doesn't generate more random configs but that you got many
> failures in the first run?!

Testing was with the following chunk out of my $0.02 script:

 i=10000 ; while [ 1 ] ; do D=../build-$i-$MYARCH ; mkdir $D ; echo xxxxxxx $D xxxxxx  ; make ARCH=$MYARCH O=$D randconfig > $D/cfg.log 2>&1 ; if [ $? != 0 ] ; then echo  cfg failed in $D ; break ; fi ; time make ARCH=$MYARCH O=$D -j16 > $D/build.log 2>&1 ; if [ $? != 0 ]; then echo  bld fail in $D ; fi ; i=$[$i+1] ; done

Then I'd comb all the build logs looking for errors that were caused
by changes that I made.  As you can see, it just calls randconfig, but
the coverage never really "randomly" covered all arm platforms.

Paul.



> 
> Best regards
> Uwe
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] dma/imx-sdma+imx-dma: explicitly #include <linux/module.h>
@ 2011-09-28 13:36       ` Paul Gortmaker
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Paul Gortmaker @ 2011-09-28 13:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Uwe Kleine-König
  Cc: Vinod Koul, Dan Williams, linux-kernel, kernel, linux-arm-kernel,
	linux-kbuild, Michal Marek

On 11-09-28 02:46 AM, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> [Cc: += linux-kbuild@v.k.o + Michal Marek]
> 
> Hello,
> 
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 06:03:13PM -0400, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
>> On 11-09-26 02:26 AM, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
>>> This is needed after commit
>>>
>>> 	include: replace linux/module.h with "struct module" wherever possible
>>>
>>> (currently 25215aa in next).
>>>
>>> Cc: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
>>> ---
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> maybe it's sensible for Paul to take that before his commit?
>>
>> Thanks, I'll blend it into the commit adding module.h to the other
>> drivers/dma files.  It seems the imx boards don't have a defconfig
>> in the arch/arm/configs that enables this (CONFIG_IMX_[S]DMA).
>>
>> What is really interesting (at least to me anyway) is that I
>> didn't get one iMX build in some 6000+ ARM randconfig builds....
>>
>> I would have thought it would have showed up at least a couple
>> times, given that number of builds.  Maybe randconfig doesn't
>> deal so well with "choice" Kconfig items?
>>
>> ~/git/module.h/linux-2.6.git$ ls -1 ../build-10*arm |wc -l
>> 6399
>> ~/git/module.h/linux-2.6.git$ grep CONFIG_ARCH_[A-Z0-9]*=y ../build-10*arm*/.config | sed 's/.*CON/CON/'|sort |uniq
>> CONFIG_ARCH_EBSA110=y
>> CONFIG_ARCH_H7201=y
>> CONFIG_ARCH_H7202=y
>> CONFIG_ARCH_H720X=y
>> CONFIG_ARCH_VERSATILE=y
> 
> I don't understand why you did that sed, but AFAICT it doesn't hurt,
> too. Maybe adding -c to uniq in your command line is interesting for the
> kbuild people?!

The sed was to strip the build paths from the grep output.  I could
have used "grep -h" instead.

> 
>> ~/git/module.h/linux-2.6.git$ 
>>
>> No ARCH_MXC, no ARCH_MXS, PXA, or any of the other 20+ variants.
>> Definitely not a random spread there, with all 6000 builds falling
>> in just 5 buckets.
> How did you test? Generate a .config, test without your change and if
> that succeeds test with it? If so, maybe the problem isn't that
> randconfig doesn't generate more random configs but that you got many
> failures in the first run?!

Testing was with the following chunk out of my $0.02 script:

 i=10000 ; while [ 1 ] ; do D=../build-$i-$MYARCH ; mkdir $D ; echo xxxxxxx $D xxxxxx  ; make ARCH=$MYARCH O=$D randconfig > $D/cfg.log 2>&1 ; if [ $? != 0 ] ; then echo  cfg failed in $D ; break ; fi ; time make ARCH=$MYARCH O=$D -j16 > $D/build.log 2>&1 ; if [ $? != 0 ]; then echo  bld fail in $D ; fi ; i=$[$i+1] ; done

Then I'd comb all the build logs looking for errors that were caused
by changes that I made.  As you can see, it just calls randconfig, but
the coverage never really "randomly" covered all arm platforms.

Paul.



> 
> Best regards
> Uwe
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] dma/imx-sdma+imx-dma: explicitly #include <linux/module.h>
@ 2011-09-28 13:36       ` Paul Gortmaker
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Paul Gortmaker @ 2011-09-28 13:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel

On 11-09-28 02:46 AM, Uwe Kleine-K?nig wrote:
> [Cc: += linux-kbuild at v.k.o + Michal Marek]
> 
> Hello,
> 
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 06:03:13PM -0400, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
>> On 11-09-26 02:26 AM, Uwe Kleine-K?nig wrote:
>>> This is needed after commit
>>>
>>> 	include: replace linux/module.h with "struct module" wherever possible
>>>
>>> (currently 25215aa in next).
>>>
>>> Cc: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-K?nig <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
>>> ---
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> maybe it's sensible for Paul to take that before his commit?
>>
>> Thanks, I'll blend it into the commit adding module.h to the other
>> drivers/dma files.  It seems the imx boards don't have a defconfig
>> in the arch/arm/configs that enables this (CONFIG_IMX_[S]DMA).
>>
>> What is really interesting (at least to me anyway) is that I
>> didn't get one iMX build in some 6000+ ARM randconfig builds....
>>
>> I would have thought it would have showed up at least a couple
>> times, given that number of builds.  Maybe randconfig doesn't
>> deal so well with "choice" Kconfig items?
>>
>> ~/git/module.h/linux-2.6.git$ ls -1 ../build-10*arm |wc -l
>> 6399
>> ~/git/module.h/linux-2.6.git$ grep CONFIG_ARCH_[A-Z0-9]*=y ../build-10*arm*/.config | sed 's/.*CON/CON/'|sort |uniq
>> CONFIG_ARCH_EBSA110=y
>> CONFIG_ARCH_H7201=y
>> CONFIG_ARCH_H7202=y
>> CONFIG_ARCH_H720X=y
>> CONFIG_ARCH_VERSATILE=y
> 
> I don't understand why you did that sed, but AFAICT it doesn't hurt,
> too. Maybe adding -c to uniq in your command line is interesting for the
> kbuild people?!

The sed was to strip the build paths from the grep output.  I could
have used "grep -h" instead.

> 
>> ~/git/module.h/linux-2.6.git$ 
>>
>> No ARCH_MXC, no ARCH_MXS, PXA, or any of the other 20+ variants.
>> Definitely not a random spread there, with all 6000 builds falling
>> in just 5 buckets.
> How did you test? Generate a .config, test without your change and if
> that succeeds test with it? If so, maybe the problem isn't that
> randconfig doesn't generate more random configs but that you got many
> failures in the first run?!

Testing was with the following chunk out of my $0.02 script:

 i=10000 ; while [ 1 ] ; do D=../build-$i-$MYARCH ; mkdir $D ; echo xxxxxxx $D xxxxxx  ; make ARCH=$MYARCH O=$D randconfig > $D/cfg.log 2>&1 ; if [ $? != 0 ] ; then echo  cfg failed in $D ; break ; fi ; time make ARCH=$MYARCH O=$D -j16 > $D/build.log 2>&1 ; if [ $? != 0 ]; then echo  bld fail in $D ; fi ; i=$[$i+1] ; done

Then I'd comb all the build logs looking for errors that were caused
by changes that I made.  As you can see, it just calls randconfig, but
the coverage never really "randomly" covered all arm platforms.

Paul.



> 
> Best regards
> Uwe
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2011-09-28 13:37 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-09-26  6:26 [PATCH] dma/imx-sdma+imx-dma: explicitly #include <linux/module.h> Uwe Kleine-König
2011-09-26  6:26 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2011-09-27 22:03 ` Paul Gortmaker
2011-09-27 22:03   ` Paul Gortmaker
2011-09-28  3:49   ` Vinod Koul
2011-09-28  3:49     ` Vinod Koul
2011-09-28  6:46   ` Uwe Kleine-König
2011-09-28  6:46     ` Uwe Kleine-König
2011-09-28  7:34     ` Arnaud Lacombe
2011-09-28  7:34       ` Arnaud Lacombe
2011-09-28 13:36     ` Paul Gortmaker
2011-09-28 13:36       ` Paul Gortmaker
2011-09-28 13:36       ` Paul Gortmaker

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.