* [PATCH 0/3] GIC OF bindings
@ 2011-09-30 19:27 ` Rob Herring
0 siblings, 0 replies; 53+ messages in thread
From: Rob Herring @ 2011-09-30 19:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel, devicetree-discuss, linux-kernel
Cc: grant.likely, marc.zyngier, thomas.abraham, jamie, b-cousson,
shawn.guo, Rob Herring
From: Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>
Another round of GIC devicetree support.
This moves the tracking of the starting hwirq number into the irq domain
code. Doing this makes hwirq == GIC interrupt ID and simplifies the GIC
code removing irq_offset.
The full series is available here. This includes Russell's devel-stable and
for-next branches and Nico's vmalloc branch:
git://git.jdl.com/software/linux-3.0.git gic-v2
Tested on highbank and Realview 11MPCore qemu (2 GICs).
Rob
Rob Herring (3):
irq: support domains with non-zero hwirq base
ARM: gic: add irq_domain support
ARM: gic: add OF based initialization
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/gic.txt | 55 ++++++++++
arch/arm/common/Kconfig | 1 +
arch/arm/common/gic.c | 142 +++++++++++++++++++------
arch/arm/include/asm/hardware/gic.h | 5 +-
include/linux/irqdomain.h | 16 +++-
kernel/irq/irqdomain.c | 12 +-
6 files changed, 189 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/gic.txt
--
1.7.5.4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 53+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 0/3] GIC OF bindings
@ 2011-09-30 19:27 ` Rob Herring
0 siblings, 0 replies; 53+ messages in thread
From: Rob Herring @ 2011-09-30 19:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
From: Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>
Another round of GIC devicetree support.
This moves the tracking of the starting hwirq number into the irq domain
code. Doing this makes hwirq == GIC interrupt ID and simplifies the GIC
code removing irq_offset.
The full series is available here. This includes Russell's devel-stable and
for-next branches and Nico's vmalloc branch:
git://git.jdl.com/software/linux-3.0.git gic-v2
Tested on highbank and Realview 11MPCore qemu (2 GICs).
Rob
Rob Herring (3):
irq: support domains with non-zero hwirq base
ARM: gic: add irq_domain support
ARM: gic: add OF based initialization
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/gic.txt | 55 ++++++++++
arch/arm/common/Kconfig | 1 +
arch/arm/common/gic.c | 142 +++++++++++++++++++------
arch/arm/include/asm/hardware/gic.h | 5 +-
include/linux/irqdomain.h | 16 +++-
kernel/irq/irqdomain.c | 12 +-
6 files changed, 189 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/gic.txt
--
1.7.5.4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 53+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 1/3] irq: support domains with non-zero hwirq base
@ 2011-09-30 19:27 ` Rob Herring
0 siblings, 0 replies; 53+ messages in thread
From: Rob Herring @ 2011-09-30 19:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel, devicetree-discuss, linux-kernel
Cc: grant.likely, marc.zyngier, thomas.abraham, jamie, b-cousson,
shawn.guo, Rob Herring, Thomas Gleixner
From: Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>
Interrupt controllers can have non-zero starting value for h/w irq numbers.
Adding support in irq_domain allows the domain hwirq numbering to match
the interrupt controllers' numbering.
As this makes looping over irqs for a domain more complicated, add loop
iterators to iterate over all hwirqs and irqs for a domain.
Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>
---
include/linux/irqdomain.h | 16 +++++++++++++++-
kernel/irq/irqdomain.c | 12 ++++++------
2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/irqdomain.h b/include/linux/irqdomain.h
index 3ad553e..c0026b6 100644
--- a/include/linux/irqdomain.h
+++ b/include/linux/irqdomain.h
@@ -47,6 +47,7 @@ struct irq_domain_ops {
* of the irq_domain is responsible for allocating the array of
* irq_desc structures.
* @nr_irq: Number of irqs managed by the irq domain
+ * @hwirq_base: Starting number for hwirqs managed by the irq domain
* @ops: pointer to irq_domain methods
* @priv: private data pointer for use by owner. Not touched by irq_domain
* core code.
@@ -57,6 +58,7 @@ struct irq_domain {
struct list_head list;
unsigned int irq_base;
unsigned int nr_irq;
+ unsigned int hwirq_base;
const struct irq_domain_ops *ops;
void *priv;
struct device_node *of_node;
@@ -72,9 +74,21 @@ struct irq_domain {
static inline unsigned int irq_domain_to_irq(struct irq_domain *d,
unsigned long hwirq)
{
- return d->ops->to_irq ? d->ops->to_irq(d, hwirq) : d->irq_base + hwirq;
+ if (d->ops->to_irq)
+ return d->ops->to_irq(d, hwirq);
+ if (hwirq < d->hwirq_base)
+ return NO_IRQ;
+ return d->irq_base + hwirq - d->hwirq_base;
}
+#define irq_domain_for_each_hwirq(d, hw) \
+ for (hw = d->hwirq_base; hw < d->hwirq_base + d->nr_irq; hw++)
+
+#define irq_domain_for_each_irq(d, hw, irq) \
+ for (hw = d->hwirq_base, irq = irq_domain_to_irq(d, hw); \
+ hw < d->hwirq_base + d->nr_irq; \
+ hw++, irq = irq_domain_to_irq(d, hw))
+
extern void irq_domain_add(struct irq_domain *domain);
extern void irq_domain_del(struct irq_domain *domain);
#endif /* CONFIG_IRQ_DOMAIN */
diff --git a/kernel/irq/irqdomain.c b/kernel/irq/irqdomain.c
index 84f4110..6b67057 100644
--- a/kernel/irq/irqdomain.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/irqdomain.c
@@ -20,15 +20,15 @@ static DEFINE_MUTEX(irq_domain_mutex);
void irq_domain_add(struct irq_domain *domain)
{
struct irq_data *d;
- int hwirq;
+ int hwirq, irq;
/*
* This assumes that the irq_domain owner has already allocated
* the irq_descs. This block will be removed when support for dynamic
* allocation of irq_descs is added to irq_domain.
*/
- for (hwirq = 0; hwirq < domain->nr_irq; hwirq++) {
- d = irq_get_irq_data(irq_domain_to_irq(domain, hwirq));
+ irq_domain_for_each_irq(domain, hwirq, irq) {
+ d = irq_get_irq_data(irq);
if (d && d->domain) {
/* things are broken; just report, don't clean up */
WARN(1, "error: irq_desc already assigned to a domain");
@@ -50,15 +50,15 @@ void irq_domain_add(struct irq_domain *domain)
void irq_domain_del(struct irq_domain *domain)
{
struct irq_data *d;
- int hwirq;
+ int hwirq, irq;
mutex_lock(&irq_domain_mutex);
list_del(&domain->list);
mutex_unlock(&irq_domain_mutex);
/* Clear the irq_domain assignments */
- for (hwirq = 0; hwirq < domain->nr_irq; hwirq++) {
- d = irq_get_irq_data(irq_domain_to_irq(domain, hwirq));
+ irq_domain_for_each_irq(domain, hwirq, irq) {
+ d = irq_get_irq_data(irq);
d->domain = NULL;
}
}
--
1.7.5.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 53+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 1/3] irq: support domains with non-zero hwirq base
@ 2011-09-30 19:27 ` Rob Herring
0 siblings, 0 replies; 53+ messages in thread
From: Rob Herring @ 2011-09-30 19:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r,
devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA
Cc: Rob Herring, Thomas Gleixner
From: Rob Herring <rob.herring-bsGFqQB8/DxBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
Interrupt controllers can have non-zero starting value for h/w irq numbers.
Adding support in irq_domain allows the domain hwirq numbering to match
the interrupt controllers' numbering.
As this makes looping over irqs for a domain more complicated, add loop
iterators to iterate over all hwirqs and irqs for a domain.
Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely-s3s/WqlpOiPyB63q8FvJNQ@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx-hfZtesqFncYOwBW4kG4KsQ@public.gmane.org>
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <rob.herring-bsGFqQB8/DxBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
---
include/linux/irqdomain.h | 16 +++++++++++++++-
kernel/irq/irqdomain.c | 12 ++++++------
2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/irqdomain.h b/include/linux/irqdomain.h
index 3ad553e..c0026b6 100644
--- a/include/linux/irqdomain.h
+++ b/include/linux/irqdomain.h
@@ -47,6 +47,7 @@ struct irq_domain_ops {
* of the irq_domain is responsible for allocating the array of
* irq_desc structures.
* @nr_irq: Number of irqs managed by the irq domain
+ * @hwirq_base: Starting number for hwirqs managed by the irq domain
* @ops: pointer to irq_domain methods
* @priv: private data pointer for use by owner. Not touched by irq_domain
* core code.
@@ -57,6 +58,7 @@ struct irq_domain {
struct list_head list;
unsigned int irq_base;
unsigned int nr_irq;
+ unsigned int hwirq_base;
const struct irq_domain_ops *ops;
void *priv;
struct device_node *of_node;
@@ -72,9 +74,21 @@ struct irq_domain {
static inline unsigned int irq_domain_to_irq(struct irq_domain *d,
unsigned long hwirq)
{
- return d->ops->to_irq ? d->ops->to_irq(d, hwirq) : d->irq_base + hwirq;
+ if (d->ops->to_irq)
+ return d->ops->to_irq(d, hwirq);
+ if (hwirq < d->hwirq_base)
+ return NO_IRQ;
+ return d->irq_base + hwirq - d->hwirq_base;
}
+#define irq_domain_for_each_hwirq(d, hw) \
+ for (hw = d->hwirq_base; hw < d->hwirq_base + d->nr_irq; hw++)
+
+#define irq_domain_for_each_irq(d, hw, irq) \
+ for (hw = d->hwirq_base, irq = irq_domain_to_irq(d, hw); \
+ hw < d->hwirq_base + d->nr_irq; \
+ hw++, irq = irq_domain_to_irq(d, hw))
+
extern void irq_domain_add(struct irq_domain *domain);
extern void irq_domain_del(struct irq_domain *domain);
#endif /* CONFIG_IRQ_DOMAIN */
diff --git a/kernel/irq/irqdomain.c b/kernel/irq/irqdomain.c
index 84f4110..6b67057 100644
--- a/kernel/irq/irqdomain.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/irqdomain.c
@@ -20,15 +20,15 @@ static DEFINE_MUTEX(irq_domain_mutex);
void irq_domain_add(struct irq_domain *domain)
{
struct irq_data *d;
- int hwirq;
+ int hwirq, irq;
/*
* This assumes that the irq_domain owner has already allocated
* the irq_descs. This block will be removed when support for dynamic
* allocation of irq_descs is added to irq_domain.
*/
- for (hwirq = 0; hwirq < domain->nr_irq; hwirq++) {
- d = irq_get_irq_data(irq_domain_to_irq(domain, hwirq));
+ irq_domain_for_each_irq(domain, hwirq, irq) {
+ d = irq_get_irq_data(irq);
if (d && d->domain) {
/* things are broken; just report, don't clean up */
WARN(1, "error: irq_desc already assigned to a domain");
@@ -50,15 +50,15 @@ void irq_domain_add(struct irq_domain *domain)
void irq_domain_del(struct irq_domain *domain)
{
struct irq_data *d;
- int hwirq;
+ int hwirq, irq;
mutex_lock(&irq_domain_mutex);
list_del(&domain->list);
mutex_unlock(&irq_domain_mutex);
/* Clear the irq_domain assignments */
- for (hwirq = 0; hwirq < domain->nr_irq; hwirq++) {
- d = irq_get_irq_data(irq_domain_to_irq(domain, hwirq));
+ irq_domain_for_each_irq(domain, hwirq, irq) {
+ d = irq_get_irq_data(irq);
d->domain = NULL;
}
}
--
1.7.5.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 53+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 1/3] irq: support domains with non-zero hwirq base
@ 2011-09-30 19:27 ` Rob Herring
0 siblings, 0 replies; 53+ messages in thread
From: Rob Herring @ 2011-09-30 19:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
From: Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>
Interrupt controllers can have non-zero starting value for h/w irq numbers.
Adding support in irq_domain allows the domain hwirq numbering to match
the interrupt controllers' numbering.
As this makes looping over irqs for a domain more complicated, add loop
iterators to iterate over all hwirqs and irqs for a domain.
Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>
---
include/linux/irqdomain.h | 16 +++++++++++++++-
kernel/irq/irqdomain.c | 12 ++++++------
2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/irqdomain.h b/include/linux/irqdomain.h
index 3ad553e..c0026b6 100644
--- a/include/linux/irqdomain.h
+++ b/include/linux/irqdomain.h
@@ -47,6 +47,7 @@ struct irq_domain_ops {
* of the irq_domain is responsible for allocating the array of
* irq_desc structures.
* @nr_irq: Number of irqs managed by the irq domain
+ * @hwirq_base: Starting number for hwirqs managed by the irq domain
* @ops: pointer to irq_domain methods
* @priv: private data pointer for use by owner. Not touched by irq_domain
* core code.
@@ -57,6 +58,7 @@ struct irq_domain {
struct list_head list;
unsigned int irq_base;
unsigned int nr_irq;
+ unsigned int hwirq_base;
const struct irq_domain_ops *ops;
void *priv;
struct device_node *of_node;
@@ -72,9 +74,21 @@ struct irq_domain {
static inline unsigned int irq_domain_to_irq(struct irq_domain *d,
unsigned long hwirq)
{
- return d->ops->to_irq ? d->ops->to_irq(d, hwirq) : d->irq_base + hwirq;
+ if (d->ops->to_irq)
+ return d->ops->to_irq(d, hwirq);
+ if (hwirq < d->hwirq_base)
+ return NO_IRQ;
+ return d->irq_base + hwirq - d->hwirq_base;
}
+#define irq_domain_for_each_hwirq(d, hw) \
+ for (hw = d->hwirq_base; hw < d->hwirq_base + d->nr_irq; hw++)
+
+#define irq_domain_for_each_irq(d, hw, irq) \
+ for (hw = d->hwirq_base, irq = irq_domain_to_irq(d, hw); \
+ hw < d->hwirq_base + d->nr_irq; \
+ hw++, irq = irq_domain_to_irq(d, hw))
+
extern void irq_domain_add(struct irq_domain *domain);
extern void irq_domain_del(struct irq_domain *domain);
#endif /* CONFIG_IRQ_DOMAIN */
diff --git a/kernel/irq/irqdomain.c b/kernel/irq/irqdomain.c
index 84f4110..6b67057 100644
--- a/kernel/irq/irqdomain.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/irqdomain.c
@@ -20,15 +20,15 @@ static DEFINE_MUTEX(irq_domain_mutex);
void irq_domain_add(struct irq_domain *domain)
{
struct irq_data *d;
- int hwirq;
+ int hwirq, irq;
/*
* This assumes that the irq_domain owner has already allocated
* the irq_descs. This block will be removed when support for dynamic
* allocation of irq_descs is added to irq_domain.
*/
- for (hwirq = 0; hwirq < domain->nr_irq; hwirq++) {
- d = irq_get_irq_data(irq_domain_to_irq(domain, hwirq));
+ irq_domain_for_each_irq(domain, hwirq, irq) {
+ d = irq_get_irq_data(irq);
if (d && d->domain) {
/* things are broken; just report, don't clean up */
WARN(1, "error: irq_desc already assigned to a domain");
@@ -50,15 +50,15 @@ void irq_domain_add(struct irq_domain *domain)
void irq_domain_del(struct irq_domain *domain)
{
struct irq_data *d;
- int hwirq;
+ int hwirq, irq;
mutex_lock(&irq_domain_mutex);
list_del(&domain->list);
mutex_unlock(&irq_domain_mutex);
/* Clear the irq_domain assignments */
- for (hwirq = 0; hwirq < domain->nr_irq; hwirq++) {
- d = irq_get_irq_data(irq_domain_to_irq(domain, hwirq));
+ irq_domain_for_each_irq(domain, hwirq, irq) {
+ d = irq_get_irq_data(irq);
d->domain = NULL;
}
}
--
1.7.5.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 53+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2/3] ARM: gic: add irq_domain support
@ 2011-09-30 19:27 ` Rob Herring
0 siblings, 0 replies; 53+ messages in thread
From: Rob Herring @ 2011-09-30 19:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel, devicetree-discuss, linux-kernel
Cc: grant.likely, marc.zyngier, thomas.abraham, jamie, b-cousson,
shawn.guo, Rob Herring
From: Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>
Convert the gic interrupt controller to use irq domains in preparation
for device-tree binding and MULTI_IRQ. This allows for translation between
GIC interrupt IDs and Linux irq numbers.
The meaning of irq_offset has changed. It now is just the number of skipped
GIC interrupt IDs for the controller. It will be 16 for primary GIC and 32
for secondary GICs.
Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>
---
arch/arm/common/Kconfig | 1 +
arch/arm/common/gic.c | 81 ++++++++++++++++++++---------------
arch/arm/include/asm/hardware/gic.h | 4 +-
3 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/common/Kconfig b/arch/arm/common/Kconfig
index 4b71766..74df9ca 100644
--- a/arch/arm/common/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/arm/common/Kconfig
@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
config ARM_GIC
+ select IRQ_DOMAIN
bool
config ARM_VIC
diff --git a/arch/arm/common/gic.c b/arch/arm/common/gic.c
index 8b5be72..6fbe1db 100644
--- a/arch/arm/common/gic.c
+++ b/arch/arm/common/gic.c
@@ -29,6 +29,7 @@
#include <linux/cpu_pm.h>
#include <linux/cpumask.h>
#include <linux/io.h>
+#include <linux/irqdomain.h>
#include <asm/irq.h>
#include <asm/mach/irq.h>
@@ -72,8 +73,7 @@ static inline void __iomem *gic_cpu_base(struct irq_data *d)
static inline unsigned int gic_irq(struct irq_data *d)
{
- struct gic_chip_data *gic_data = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
- return d->irq - gic_data->irq_offset;
+ return d->hwirq;
}
/*
@@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ static inline unsigned int gic_irq(struct irq_data *d)
*/
static void gic_mask_irq(struct irq_data *d)
{
- u32 mask = 1 << (d->irq % 32);
+ u32 mask = 1 << (gic_irq(d) % 32);
spin_lock(&irq_controller_lock);
writel_relaxed(mask, gic_dist_base(d) + GIC_DIST_ENABLE_CLEAR + (gic_irq(d) / 32) * 4);
@@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ static void gic_mask_irq(struct irq_data *d)
static void gic_unmask_irq(struct irq_data *d)
{
- u32 mask = 1 << (d->irq % 32);
+ u32 mask = 1 << (gic_irq(d) % 32);
spin_lock(&irq_controller_lock);
if (gic_arch_extn.irq_unmask)
@@ -173,7 +173,7 @@ static int gic_set_affinity(struct irq_data *d, const struct cpumask *mask_val,
bool force)
{
void __iomem *reg = gic_dist_base(d) + GIC_DIST_TARGET + (gic_irq(d) & ~3);
- unsigned int shift = (d->irq % 4) * 8;
+ unsigned int shift = (gic_irq(d) % 4) * 8;
unsigned int cpu = cpumask_any_and(mask_val, cpu_online_mask);
u32 val, mask, bit;
@@ -224,7 +224,7 @@ static void gic_handle_cascade_irq(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc)
if (gic_irq == 1023)
goto out;
- cascade_irq = gic_irq + chip_data->irq_offset;
+ cascade_irq = irq_domain_to_irq(&chip_data->domain, gic_irq);
if (unlikely(gic_irq < 32 || gic_irq > 1020 || cascade_irq >= NR_IRQS))
do_bad_IRQ(cascade_irq, desc);
else
@@ -256,10 +256,11 @@ void __init gic_cascade_irq(unsigned int gic_nr, unsigned int irq)
irq_set_chained_handler(irq, gic_handle_cascade_irq);
}
-static void __init gic_dist_init(struct gic_chip_data *gic,
- unsigned int irq_start)
+static void __init gic_dist_init(struct gic_chip_data *gic)
{
- unsigned int gic_irqs, irq_limit, i;
+ unsigned int gic_irqs = gic->gic_irqs;
+ struct irq_domain *domain = &gic->domain;
+ unsigned int i, irq;
u32 cpumask;
void __iomem *base = gic->dist_base;
u32 cpu = 0;
@@ -275,17 +276,6 @@ static void __init gic_dist_init(struct gic_chip_data *gic,
writel_relaxed(0, base + GIC_DIST_CTRL);
/*
- * Find out how many interrupts are supported.
- * The GIC only supports up to 1020 interrupt sources.
- */
- gic_irqs = readl_relaxed(base + GIC_DIST_CTR) & 0x1f;
- gic_irqs = (gic_irqs + 1) * 32;
- if (gic_irqs > 1020)
- gic_irqs = 1020;
-
- gic->gic_irqs = gic_irqs;
-
- /*
* Set all global interrupts to be level triggered, active low.
*/
for (i = 32; i < gic_irqs; i += 16)
@@ -311,19 +301,12 @@ static void __init gic_dist_init(struct gic_chip_data *gic,
writel_relaxed(0xffffffff, base + GIC_DIST_ENABLE_CLEAR + i * 4 / 32);
/*
- * Limit number of interrupts registered to the platform maximum
- */
- irq_limit = gic->irq_offset + gic_irqs;
- if (WARN_ON(irq_limit > NR_IRQS))
- irq_limit = NR_IRQS;
-
- /*
* Setup the Linux IRQ subsystem.
*/
- for (i = irq_start; i < irq_limit; i++) {
- irq_set_chip_and_handler(i, &gic_chip, handle_fasteoi_irq);
- irq_set_chip_data(i, gic);
- set_irq_flags(i, IRQF_VALID | IRQF_PROBE);
+ irq_domain_for_each_irq(domain, i, irq) {
+ irq_set_chip_and_handler(irq, &gic_chip, handle_fasteoi_irq);
+ irq_set_chip_data(irq, gic);
+ set_irq_flags(irq, IRQF_VALID | IRQF_PROBE);
}
writel_relaxed(1, base + GIC_DIST_CTRL);
@@ -535,23 +518,53 @@ static void __init gic_pm_init(struct gic_chip_data *gic)
}
#endif
+const struct irq_domain_ops gic_irq_domain_ops = {
+};
+
void __init gic_init(unsigned int gic_nr, unsigned int irq_start,
void __iomem *dist_base, void __iomem *cpu_base)
{
struct gic_chip_data *gic;
+ struct irq_domain *domain;
+ int gic_irqs;
BUG_ON(gic_nr >= MAX_GIC_NR);
gic = &gic_data[gic_nr];
+ domain = &gic->domain;
gic->dist_base = dist_base;
gic->cpu_base = cpu_base;
- gic->irq_offset = (irq_start - 1) & ~31;
- if (gic_nr == 0)
+ /*
+ * For primary GICs, skip over SGIs.
+ * For secondary GICs, skip over PPIs, too.
+ */
+ if (gic_nr == 0) {
gic_cpu_base_addr = cpu_base;
+ domain->hwirq_base = 16;
+ irq_start = (irq_start & ~31) + 16;
+ } else
+ domain->hwirq_base = 32;
+
+ /*
+ * Find out how many interrupts are supported.
+ * The GIC only supports up to 1020 interrupt sources.
+ */
+ gic_irqs = readl_relaxed(dist_base + GIC_DIST_CTR) & 0x1f;
+ gic_irqs = (gic_irqs + 1) * 32;
+ if (gic_irqs > 1020)
+ gic_irqs = 1020;
+ gic->gic_irqs = gic_irqs;
+
+ domain->nr_irq = gic_irqs - domain->hwirq_base;
+ domain->irq_base = irq_alloc_descs(-1, irq_start, domain->nr_irq,
+ numa_node_id());
+ domain->priv = gic;
+ domain->ops = &gic_irq_domain_ops;
+ irq_domain_add(domain);
gic_chip.flags |= gic_arch_extn.flags;
- gic_dist_init(gic, irq_start);
+ gic_dist_init(gic);
gic_cpu_init(gic);
gic_pm_init(gic);
}
diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/hardware/gic.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/hardware/gic.h
index c562705..ade84a4 100644
--- a/arch/arm/include/asm/hardware/gic.h
+++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/hardware/gic.h
@@ -33,6 +33,8 @@
#define GIC_DIST_SOFTINT 0xf00
#ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
+#include <linux/irqdomain.h>
+
extern void __iomem *gic_cpu_base_addr;
extern struct irq_chip gic_arch_extn;
@@ -43,7 +45,6 @@ void gic_raise_softirq(const struct cpumask *mask, unsigned int irq);
void gic_enable_ppi(unsigned int);
struct gic_chip_data {
- unsigned int irq_offset;
void __iomem *dist_base;
void __iomem *cpu_base;
#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_PM
@@ -53,6 +54,7 @@ struct gic_chip_data {
u32 __percpu *saved_ppi_enable;
u32 __percpu *saved_ppi_conf;
#endif
+ struct irq_domain domain;
unsigned int gic_irqs;
};
#endif
--
1.7.5.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 53+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2/3] ARM: gic: add irq_domain support
@ 2011-09-30 19:27 ` Rob Herring
0 siblings, 0 replies; 53+ messages in thread
From: Rob Herring @ 2011-09-30 19:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r,
devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA
Cc: Rob Herring
From: Rob Herring <rob.herring-bsGFqQB8/DxBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
Convert the gic interrupt controller to use irq domains in preparation
for device-tree binding and MULTI_IRQ. This allows for translation between
GIC interrupt IDs and Linux irq numbers.
The meaning of irq_offset has changed. It now is just the number of skipped
GIC interrupt IDs for the controller. It will be 16 for primary GIC and 32
for secondary GICs.
Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <rob.herring-bsGFqQB8/DxBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
---
arch/arm/common/Kconfig | 1 +
arch/arm/common/gic.c | 81 ++++++++++++++++++++---------------
arch/arm/include/asm/hardware/gic.h | 4 +-
3 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/common/Kconfig b/arch/arm/common/Kconfig
index 4b71766..74df9ca 100644
--- a/arch/arm/common/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/arm/common/Kconfig
@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
config ARM_GIC
+ select IRQ_DOMAIN
bool
config ARM_VIC
diff --git a/arch/arm/common/gic.c b/arch/arm/common/gic.c
index 8b5be72..6fbe1db 100644
--- a/arch/arm/common/gic.c
+++ b/arch/arm/common/gic.c
@@ -29,6 +29,7 @@
#include <linux/cpu_pm.h>
#include <linux/cpumask.h>
#include <linux/io.h>
+#include <linux/irqdomain.h>
#include <asm/irq.h>
#include <asm/mach/irq.h>
@@ -72,8 +73,7 @@ static inline void __iomem *gic_cpu_base(struct irq_data *d)
static inline unsigned int gic_irq(struct irq_data *d)
{
- struct gic_chip_data *gic_data = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
- return d->irq - gic_data->irq_offset;
+ return d->hwirq;
}
/*
@@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ static inline unsigned int gic_irq(struct irq_data *d)
*/
static void gic_mask_irq(struct irq_data *d)
{
- u32 mask = 1 << (d->irq % 32);
+ u32 mask = 1 << (gic_irq(d) % 32);
spin_lock(&irq_controller_lock);
writel_relaxed(mask, gic_dist_base(d) + GIC_DIST_ENABLE_CLEAR + (gic_irq(d) / 32) * 4);
@@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ static void gic_mask_irq(struct irq_data *d)
static void gic_unmask_irq(struct irq_data *d)
{
- u32 mask = 1 << (d->irq % 32);
+ u32 mask = 1 << (gic_irq(d) % 32);
spin_lock(&irq_controller_lock);
if (gic_arch_extn.irq_unmask)
@@ -173,7 +173,7 @@ static int gic_set_affinity(struct irq_data *d, const struct cpumask *mask_val,
bool force)
{
void __iomem *reg = gic_dist_base(d) + GIC_DIST_TARGET + (gic_irq(d) & ~3);
- unsigned int shift = (d->irq % 4) * 8;
+ unsigned int shift = (gic_irq(d) % 4) * 8;
unsigned int cpu = cpumask_any_and(mask_val, cpu_online_mask);
u32 val, mask, bit;
@@ -224,7 +224,7 @@ static void gic_handle_cascade_irq(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc)
if (gic_irq == 1023)
goto out;
- cascade_irq = gic_irq + chip_data->irq_offset;
+ cascade_irq = irq_domain_to_irq(&chip_data->domain, gic_irq);
if (unlikely(gic_irq < 32 || gic_irq > 1020 || cascade_irq >= NR_IRQS))
do_bad_IRQ(cascade_irq, desc);
else
@@ -256,10 +256,11 @@ void __init gic_cascade_irq(unsigned int gic_nr, unsigned int irq)
irq_set_chained_handler(irq, gic_handle_cascade_irq);
}
-static void __init gic_dist_init(struct gic_chip_data *gic,
- unsigned int irq_start)
+static void __init gic_dist_init(struct gic_chip_data *gic)
{
- unsigned int gic_irqs, irq_limit, i;
+ unsigned int gic_irqs = gic->gic_irqs;
+ struct irq_domain *domain = &gic->domain;
+ unsigned int i, irq;
u32 cpumask;
void __iomem *base = gic->dist_base;
u32 cpu = 0;
@@ -275,17 +276,6 @@ static void __init gic_dist_init(struct gic_chip_data *gic,
writel_relaxed(0, base + GIC_DIST_CTRL);
/*
- * Find out how many interrupts are supported.
- * The GIC only supports up to 1020 interrupt sources.
- */
- gic_irqs = readl_relaxed(base + GIC_DIST_CTR) & 0x1f;
- gic_irqs = (gic_irqs + 1) * 32;
- if (gic_irqs > 1020)
- gic_irqs = 1020;
-
- gic->gic_irqs = gic_irqs;
-
- /*
* Set all global interrupts to be level triggered, active low.
*/
for (i = 32; i < gic_irqs; i += 16)
@@ -311,19 +301,12 @@ static void __init gic_dist_init(struct gic_chip_data *gic,
writel_relaxed(0xffffffff, base + GIC_DIST_ENABLE_CLEAR + i * 4 / 32);
/*
- * Limit number of interrupts registered to the platform maximum
- */
- irq_limit = gic->irq_offset + gic_irqs;
- if (WARN_ON(irq_limit > NR_IRQS))
- irq_limit = NR_IRQS;
-
- /*
* Setup the Linux IRQ subsystem.
*/
- for (i = irq_start; i < irq_limit; i++) {
- irq_set_chip_and_handler(i, &gic_chip, handle_fasteoi_irq);
- irq_set_chip_data(i, gic);
- set_irq_flags(i, IRQF_VALID | IRQF_PROBE);
+ irq_domain_for_each_irq(domain, i, irq) {
+ irq_set_chip_and_handler(irq, &gic_chip, handle_fasteoi_irq);
+ irq_set_chip_data(irq, gic);
+ set_irq_flags(irq, IRQF_VALID | IRQF_PROBE);
}
writel_relaxed(1, base + GIC_DIST_CTRL);
@@ -535,23 +518,53 @@ static void __init gic_pm_init(struct gic_chip_data *gic)
}
#endif
+const struct irq_domain_ops gic_irq_domain_ops = {
+};
+
void __init gic_init(unsigned int gic_nr, unsigned int irq_start,
void __iomem *dist_base, void __iomem *cpu_base)
{
struct gic_chip_data *gic;
+ struct irq_domain *domain;
+ int gic_irqs;
BUG_ON(gic_nr >= MAX_GIC_NR);
gic = &gic_data[gic_nr];
+ domain = &gic->domain;
gic->dist_base = dist_base;
gic->cpu_base = cpu_base;
- gic->irq_offset = (irq_start - 1) & ~31;
- if (gic_nr == 0)
+ /*
+ * For primary GICs, skip over SGIs.
+ * For secondary GICs, skip over PPIs, too.
+ */
+ if (gic_nr == 0) {
gic_cpu_base_addr = cpu_base;
+ domain->hwirq_base = 16;
+ irq_start = (irq_start & ~31) + 16;
+ } else
+ domain->hwirq_base = 32;
+
+ /*
+ * Find out how many interrupts are supported.
+ * The GIC only supports up to 1020 interrupt sources.
+ */
+ gic_irqs = readl_relaxed(dist_base + GIC_DIST_CTR) & 0x1f;
+ gic_irqs = (gic_irqs + 1) * 32;
+ if (gic_irqs > 1020)
+ gic_irqs = 1020;
+ gic->gic_irqs = gic_irqs;
+
+ domain->nr_irq = gic_irqs - domain->hwirq_base;
+ domain->irq_base = irq_alloc_descs(-1, irq_start, domain->nr_irq,
+ numa_node_id());
+ domain->priv = gic;
+ domain->ops = &gic_irq_domain_ops;
+ irq_domain_add(domain);
gic_chip.flags |= gic_arch_extn.flags;
- gic_dist_init(gic, irq_start);
+ gic_dist_init(gic);
gic_cpu_init(gic);
gic_pm_init(gic);
}
diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/hardware/gic.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/hardware/gic.h
index c562705..ade84a4 100644
--- a/arch/arm/include/asm/hardware/gic.h
+++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/hardware/gic.h
@@ -33,6 +33,8 @@
#define GIC_DIST_SOFTINT 0xf00
#ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
+#include <linux/irqdomain.h>
+
extern void __iomem *gic_cpu_base_addr;
extern struct irq_chip gic_arch_extn;
@@ -43,7 +45,6 @@ void gic_raise_softirq(const struct cpumask *mask, unsigned int irq);
void gic_enable_ppi(unsigned int);
struct gic_chip_data {
- unsigned int irq_offset;
void __iomem *dist_base;
void __iomem *cpu_base;
#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_PM
@@ -53,6 +54,7 @@ struct gic_chip_data {
u32 __percpu *saved_ppi_enable;
u32 __percpu *saved_ppi_conf;
#endif
+ struct irq_domain domain;
unsigned int gic_irqs;
};
#endif
--
1.7.5.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 53+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2/3] ARM: gic: add irq_domain support
@ 2011-09-30 19:27 ` Rob Herring
0 siblings, 0 replies; 53+ messages in thread
From: Rob Herring @ 2011-09-30 19:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
From: Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>
Convert the gic interrupt controller to use irq domains in preparation
for device-tree binding and MULTI_IRQ. This allows for translation between
GIC interrupt IDs and Linux irq numbers.
The meaning of irq_offset has changed. It now is just the number of skipped
GIC interrupt IDs for the controller. It will be 16 for primary GIC and 32
for secondary GICs.
Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>
---
arch/arm/common/Kconfig | 1 +
arch/arm/common/gic.c | 81 ++++++++++++++++++++---------------
arch/arm/include/asm/hardware/gic.h | 4 +-
3 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/common/Kconfig b/arch/arm/common/Kconfig
index 4b71766..74df9ca 100644
--- a/arch/arm/common/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/arm/common/Kconfig
@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
config ARM_GIC
+ select IRQ_DOMAIN
bool
config ARM_VIC
diff --git a/arch/arm/common/gic.c b/arch/arm/common/gic.c
index 8b5be72..6fbe1db 100644
--- a/arch/arm/common/gic.c
+++ b/arch/arm/common/gic.c
@@ -29,6 +29,7 @@
#include <linux/cpu_pm.h>
#include <linux/cpumask.h>
#include <linux/io.h>
+#include <linux/irqdomain.h>
#include <asm/irq.h>
#include <asm/mach/irq.h>
@@ -72,8 +73,7 @@ static inline void __iomem *gic_cpu_base(struct irq_data *d)
static inline unsigned int gic_irq(struct irq_data *d)
{
- struct gic_chip_data *gic_data = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
- return d->irq - gic_data->irq_offset;
+ return d->hwirq;
}
/*
@@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ static inline unsigned int gic_irq(struct irq_data *d)
*/
static void gic_mask_irq(struct irq_data *d)
{
- u32 mask = 1 << (d->irq % 32);
+ u32 mask = 1 << (gic_irq(d) % 32);
spin_lock(&irq_controller_lock);
writel_relaxed(mask, gic_dist_base(d) + GIC_DIST_ENABLE_CLEAR + (gic_irq(d) / 32) * 4);
@@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ static void gic_mask_irq(struct irq_data *d)
static void gic_unmask_irq(struct irq_data *d)
{
- u32 mask = 1 << (d->irq % 32);
+ u32 mask = 1 << (gic_irq(d) % 32);
spin_lock(&irq_controller_lock);
if (gic_arch_extn.irq_unmask)
@@ -173,7 +173,7 @@ static int gic_set_affinity(struct irq_data *d, const struct cpumask *mask_val,
bool force)
{
void __iomem *reg = gic_dist_base(d) + GIC_DIST_TARGET + (gic_irq(d) & ~3);
- unsigned int shift = (d->irq % 4) * 8;
+ unsigned int shift = (gic_irq(d) % 4) * 8;
unsigned int cpu = cpumask_any_and(mask_val, cpu_online_mask);
u32 val, mask, bit;
@@ -224,7 +224,7 @@ static void gic_handle_cascade_irq(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc)
if (gic_irq == 1023)
goto out;
- cascade_irq = gic_irq + chip_data->irq_offset;
+ cascade_irq = irq_domain_to_irq(&chip_data->domain, gic_irq);
if (unlikely(gic_irq < 32 || gic_irq > 1020 || cascade_irq >= NR_IRQS))
do_bad_IRQ(cascade_irq, desc);
else
@@ -256,10 +256,11 @@ void __init gic_cascade_irq(unsigned int gic_nr, unsigned int irq)
irq_set_chained_handler(irq, gic_handle_cascade_irq);
}
-static void __init gic_dist_init(struct gic_chip_data *gic,
- unsigned int irq_start)
+static void __init gic_dist_init(struct gic_chip_data *gic)
{
- unsigned int gic_irqs, irq_limit, i;
+ unsigned int gic_irqs = gic->gic_irqs;
+ struct irq_domain *domain = &gic->domain;
+ unsigned int i, irq;
u32 cpumask;
void __iomem *base = gic->dist_base;
u32 cpu = 0;
@@ -275,17 +276,6 @@ static void __init gic_dist_init(struct gic_chip_data *gic,
writel_relaxed(0, base + GIC_DIST_CTRL);
/*
- * Find out how many interrupts are supported.
- * The GIC only supports up to 1020 interrupt sources.
- */
- gic_irqs = readl_relaxed(base + GIC_DIST_CTR) & 0x1f;
- gic_irqs = (gic_irqs + 1) * 32;
- if (gic_irqs > 1020)
- gic_irqs = 1020;
-
- gic->gic_irqs = gic_irqs;
-
- /*
* Set all global interrupts to be level triggered, active low.
*/
for (i = 32; i < gic_irqs; i += 16)
@@ -311,19 +301,12 @@ static void __init gic_dist_init(struct gic_chip_data *gic,
writel_relaxed(0xffffffff, base + GIC_DIST_ENABLE_CLEAR + i * 4 / 32);
/*
- * Limit number of interrupts registered to the platform maximum
- */
- irq_limit = gic->irq_offset + gic_irqs;
- if (WARN_ON(irq_limit > NR_IRQS))
- irq_limit = NR_IRQS;
-
- /*
* Setup the Linux IRQ subsystem.
*/
- for (i = irq_start; i < irq_limit; i++) {
- irq_set_chip_and_handler(i, &gic_chip, handle_fasteoi_irq);
- irq_set_chip_data(i, gic);
- set_irq_flags(i, IRQF_VALID | IRQF_PROBE);
+ irq_domain_for_each_irq(domain, i, irq) {
+ irq_set_chip_and_handler(irq, &gic_chip, handle_fasteoi_irq);
+ irq_set_chip_data(irq, gic);
+ set_irq_flags(irq, IRQF_VALID | IRQF_PROBE);
}
writel_relaxed(1, base + GIC_DIST_CTRL);
@@ -535,23 +518,53 @@ static void __init gic_pm_init(struct gic_chip_data *gic)
}
#endif
+const struct irq_domain_ops gic_irq_domain_ops = {
+};
+
void __init gic_init(unsigned int gic_nr, unsigned int irq_start,
void __iomem *dist_base, void __iomem *cpu_base)
{
struct gic_chip_data *gic;
+ struct irq_domain *domain;
+ int gic_irqs;
BUG_ON(gic_nr >= MAX_GIC_NR);
gic = &gic_data[gic_nr];
+ domain = &gic->domain;
gic->dist_base = dist_base;
gic->cpu_base = cpu_base;
- gic->irq_offset = (irq_start - 1) & ~31;
- if (gic_nr == 0)
+ /*
+ * For primary GICs, skip over SGIs.
+ * For secondary GICs, skip over PPIs, too.
+ */
+ if (gic_nr == 0) {
gic_cpu_base_addr = cpu_base;
+ domain->hwirq_base = 16;
+ irq_start = (irq_start & ~31) + 16;
+ } else
+ domain->hwirq_base = 32;
+
+ /*
+ * Find out how many interrupts are supported.
+ * The GIC only supports up to 1020 interrupt sources.
+ */
+ gic_irqs = readl_relaxed(dist_base + GIC_DIST_CTR) & 0x1f;
+ gic_irqs = (gic_irqs + 1) * 32;
+ if (gic_irqs > 1020)
+ gic_irqs = 1020;
+ gic->gic_irqs = gic_irqs;
+
+ domain->nr_irq = gic_irqs - domain->hwirq_base;
+ domain->irq_base = irq_alloc_descs(-1, irq_start, domain->nr_irq,
+ numa_node_id());
+ domain->priv = gic;
+ domain->ops = &gic_irq_domain_ops;
+ irq_domain_add(domain);
gic_chip.flags |= gic_arch_extn.flags;
- gic_dist_init(gic, irq_start);
+ gic_dist_init(gic);
gic_cpu_init(gic);
gic_pm_init(gic);
}
diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/hardware/gic.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/hardware/gic.h
index c562705..ade84a4 100644
--- a/arch/arm/include/asm/hardware/gic.h
+++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/hardware/gic.h
@@ -33,6 +33,8 @@
#define GIC_DIST_SOFTINT 0xf00
#ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
+#include <linux/irqdomain.h>
+
extern void __iomem *gic_cpu_base_addr;
extern struct irq_chip gic_arch_extn;
@@ -43,7 +45,6 @@ void gic_raise_softirq(const struct cpumask *mask, unsigned int irq);
void gic_enable_ppi(unsigned int);
struct gic_chip_data {
- unsigned int irq_offset;
void __iomem *dist_base;
void __iomem *cpu_base;
#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_PM
@@ -53,6 +54,7 @@ struct gic_chip_data {
u32 __percpu *saved_ppi_enable;
u32 __percpu *saved_ppi_conf;
#endif
+ struct irq_domain domain;
unsigned int gic_irqs;
};
#endif
--
1.7.5.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 53+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 3/3] ARM: gic: add OF based initialization
@ 2011-09-30 19:28 ` Rob Herring
0 siblings, 0 replies; 53+ messages in thread
From: Rob Herring @ 2011-09-30 19:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel, devicetree-discuss, linux-kernel
Cc: grant.likely, marc.zyngier, thomas.abraham, jamie, b-cousson,
shawn.guo, Rob Herring
From: Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>
This adds ARM gic interrupt controller initialization using device tree
data.
The initialization function is intended to be called by of_irq_init
function like this:
const static struct of_device_id irq_match[] = {
{ .compatible = "arm,cortex-a9-gic", .data = gic_of_init, },
{}
};
static void __init init_irqs(void)
{
of_irq_init(irq_match);
}
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>
---
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/gic.txt | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++++
arch/arm/common/gic.c | 61 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
arch/arm/include/asm/hardware/gic.h | 1 +
3 files changed, 117 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/gic.txt
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/gic.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/gic.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..52916b4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/gic.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,55 @@
+* ARM Generic Interrupt Controller
+
+ARM SMP cores are often associated with a GIC, providing per processor
+interrupts (PPI), shared processor interrupts (SPI) and software
+generated interrupts (SGI).
+
+Primary GIC is attached directly to the CPU and typically has PPIs and SGIs.
+Secondary GICs are cascaded into the upward interrupt controller and do not
+have PPIs or SGIs.
+
+Main node required properties:
+
+- compatible : should be one of:
+ "arm,cortex-a9-gic"
+ "arm,arm11mp-gic"
+- interrupt-controller : Identifies the node as an interrupt controller
+- #interrupt-cells : Specifies the number of cells needed to encode an
+ interrupt source. The type shall be a <u32> and the value shall be 3.
+
+ The 1st cell is the interrupt type; 0 for SPI interrupts, 1 for PPI
+ interrupts.
+
+ The 2nd cell contains the interrupt number for the interrupt type.
+ SPI interrupts are in the range [0-987]. PPI interrupts are in the
+ range [0-15].
+
+ The 3rd cell is the flags, encoded as follows:
+ bits[3:0] trigger type and level flags.
+ 1 = low-to-high edge triggered
+ 2 = high-to-low edge triggered
+ 4 = active high level-sensitive
+ 8 = active low level-sensitive
+ bits[15:8] PPI interrupt cpu mask. Each bit corresponds to each of
+ the 8 possible cpus attached to the GIC. A bit set to '1' indicated
+ the interrupt is wired to that CPU. Only valid for PPI interrupts.
+
+- reg : Specifies base physical address(s) and size of the GIC registers. The
+ first region is the GIC distributor register base and size. The 2nd region is
+ the GIC cpu interface register base and size.
+
+Optional
+- interrupts : Interrupt source of the parent interrupt controller. Only
+ present on secondary GICs.
+
+Example:
+
+ intc: interrupt-controller@fff11000 {
+ compatible = "arm,cortex-a9-gic";
+ #interrupt-cells = <3>;
+ #address-cells = <1>;
+ interrupt-controller;
+ reg = <0xfff11000 0x1000>,
+ <0xfff10100 0x100>;
+ };
+
diff --git a/arch/arm/common/gic.c b/arch/arm/common/gic.c
index 6fbe1db..3e67970 100644
--- a/arch/arm/common/gic.c
+++ b/arch/arm/common/gic.c
@@ -29,6 +29,9 @@
#include <linux/cpu_pm.h>
#include <linux/cpumask.h>
#include <linux/io.h>
+#include <linux/of.h>
+#include <linux/of_address.h>
+#include <linux/of_irq.h>
#include <linux/irqdomain.h>
#include <asm/irq.h>
@@ -518,7 +521,33 @@ static void __init gic_pm_init(struct gic_chip_data *gic)
}
#endif
+#ifdef CONFIG_OF
+static int gic_irq_domain_dt_translate(struct irq_domain *d,
+ struct device_node *controller,
+ const u32 *intspec, unsigned int intsize,
+ unsigned long *out_hwirq, unsigned int *out_type)
+{
+ if (d->of_node != controller)
+ return -EINVAL;
+ if (intsize < 3)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ /* Get the interrupt number and add 16 to skip over SGIs */
+ *out_hwirq = intspec[1] + 16;
+
+ /* For SPIs, we need to add 16 more to get the GIC irq ID number */
+ if (!intspec[0])
+ *out_hwirq += 16;
+
+ *out_type = intspec[2] & IRQ_TYPE_SENSE_MASK;
+ return 0;
+}
+#endif
+
const struct irq_domain_ops gic_irq_domain_ops = {
+#ifdef CONFIG_OF
+ .dt_translate = gic_irq_domain_dt_translate,
+#endif
};
void __init gic_init(unsigned int gic_nr, unsigned int irq_start,
@@ -606,3 +635,35 @@ void gic_raise_softirq(const struct cpumask *mask, unsigned int irq)
writel_relaxed(map << 16 | irq, gic_data[0].dist_base + GIC_DIST_SOFTINT);
}
#endif
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_OF
+static int gic_cnt __initdata = 0;
+
+int __init gic_of_init(struct device_node *node, struct device_node *parent)
+{
+ void __iomem *cpu_base;
+ void __iomem *dist_base;
+ int irq;
+ struct irq_domain *domain = &gic_data[gic_cnt].domain;
+
+ if (WARN_ON(!node))
+ return -ENODEV;
+
+ dist_base = of_iomap(node, 0);
+ WARN(!dist_base, "unable to map gic dist registers\n");
+
+ cpu_base = of_iomap(node, 1);
+ WARN(!cpu_base, "unable to map gic cpu registers\n");
+
+ domain->of_node = of_node_get(node);
+
+ gic_init(gic_cnt, 16, dist_base, cpu_base);
+
+ if (parent) {
+ irq = irq_of_parse_and_map(node, 0);
+ gic_cascade_irq(gic_cnt, irq);
+ }
+ gic_cnt++;
+ return 0;
+}
+#endif
diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/hardware/gic.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/hardware/gic.h
index ade84a4..1a776a1 100644
--- a/arch/arm/include/asm/hardware/gic.h
+++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/hardware/gic.h
@@ -39,6 +39,7 @@ extern void __iomem *gic_cpu_base_addr;
extern struct irq_chip gic_arch_extn;
void gic_init(unsigned int, unsigned int, void __iomem *, void __iomem *);
+int gic_of_init(struct device_node *node, struct device_node *parent);
void gic_secondary_init(unsigned int);
void gic_cascade_irq(unsigned int gic_nr, unsigned int irq);
void gic_raise_softirq(const struct cpumask *mask, unsigned int irq);
--
1.7.5.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 53+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 3/3] ARM: gic: add OF based initialization
@ 2011-09-30 19:28 ` Rob Herring
0 siblings, 0 replies; 53+ messages in thread
From: Rob Herring @ 2011-09-30 19:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r,
devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA
Cc: Rob Herring
From: Rob Herring <rob.herring-bsGFqQB8/DxBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
This adds ARM gic interrupt controller initialization using device tree
data.
The initialization function is intended to be called by of_irq_init
function like this:
const static struct of_device_id irq_match[] = {
{ .compatible = "arm,cortex-a9-gic", .data = gic_of_init, },
{}
};
static void __init init_irqs(void)
{
of_irq_init(irq_match);
}
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <rob.herring-bsGFqQB8/DxBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
---
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/gic.txt | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++++
arch/arm/common/gic.c | 61 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
arch/arm/include/asm/hardware/gic.h | 1 +
3 files changed, 117 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/gic.txt
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/gic.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/gic.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..52916b4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/gic.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,55 @@
+* ARM Generic Interrupt Controller
+
+ARM SMP cores are often associated with a GIC, providing per processor
+interrupts (PPI), shared processor interrupts (SPI) and software
+generated interrupts (SGI).
+
+Primary GIC is attached directly to the CPU and typically has PPIs and SGIs.
+Secondary GICs are cascaded into the upward interrupt controller and do not
+have PPIs or SGIs.
+
+Main node required properties:
+
+- compatible : should be one of:
+ "arm,cortex-a9-gic"
+ "arm,arm11mp-gic"
+- interrupt-controller : Identifies the node as an interrupt controller
+- #interrupt-cells : Specifies the number of cells needed to encode an
+ interrupt source. The type shall be a <u32> and the value shall be 3.
+
+ The 1st cell is the interrupt type; 0 for SPI interrupts, 1 for PPI
+ interrupts.
+
+ The 2nd cell contains the interrupt number for the interrupt type.
+ SPI interrupts are in the range [0-987]. PPI interrupts are in the
+ range [0-15].
+
+ The 3rd cell is the flags, encoded as follows:
+ bits[3:0] trigger type and level flags.
+ 1 = low-to-high edge triggered
+ 2 = high-to-low edge triggered
+ 4 = active high level-sensitive
+ 8 = active low level-sensitive
+ bits[15:8] PPI interrupt cpu mask. Each bit corresponds to each of
+ the 8 possible cpus attached to the GIC. A bit set to '1' indicated
+ the interrupt is wired to that CPU. Only valid for PPI interrupts.
+
+- reg : Specifies base physical address(s) and size of the GIC registers. The
+ first region is the GIC distributor register base and size. The 2nd region is
+ the GIC cpu interface register base and size.
+
+Optional
+- interrupts : Interrupt source of the parent interrupt controller. Only
+ present on secondary GICs.
+
+Example:
+
+ intc: interrupt-controller@fff11000 {
+ compatible = "arm,cortex-a9-gic";
+ #interrupt-cells = <3>;
+ #address-cells = <1>;
+ interrupt-controller;
+ reg = <0xfff11000 0x1000>,
+ <0xfff10100 0x100>;
+ };
+
diff --git a/arch/arm/common/gic.c b/arch/arm/common/gic.c
index 6fbe1db..3e67970 100644
--- a/arch/arm/common/gic.c
+++ b/arch/arm/common/gic.c
@@ -29,6 +29,9 @@
#include <linux/cpu_pm.h>
#include <linux/cpumask.h>
#include <linux/io.h>
+#include <linux/of.h>
+#include <linux/of_address.h>
+#include <linux/of_irq.h>
#include <linux/irqdomain.h>
#include <asm/irq.h>
@@ -518,7 +521,33 @@ static void __init gic_pm_init(struct gic_chip_data *gic)
}
#endif
+#ifdef CONFIG_OF
+static int gic_irq_domain_dt_translate(struct irq_domain *d,
+ struct device_node *controller,
+ const u32 *intspec, unsigned int intsize,
+ unsigned long *out_hwirq, unsigned int *out_type)
+{
+ if (d->of_node != controller)
+ return -EINVAL;
+ if (intsize < 3)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ /* Get the interrupt number and add 16 to skip over SGIs */
+ *out_hwirq = intspec[1] + 16;
+
+ /* For SPIs, we need to add 16 more to get the GIC irq ID number */
+ if (!intspec[0])
+ *out_hwirq += 16;
+
+ *out_type = intspec[2] & IRQ_TYPE_SENSE_MASK;
+ return 0;
+}
+#endif
+
const struct irq_domain_ops gic_irq_domain_ops = {
+#ifdef CONFIG_OF
+ .dt_translate = gic_irq_domain_dt_translate,
+#endif
};
void __init gic_init(unsigned int gic_nr, unsigned int irq_start,
@@ -606,3 +635,35 @@ void gic_raise_softirq(const struct cpumask *mask, unsigned int irq)
writel_relaxed(map << 16 | irq, gic_data[0].dist_base + GIC_DIST_SOFTINT);
}
#endif
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_OF
+static int gic_cnt __initdata = 0;
+
+int __init gic_of_init(struct device_node *node, struct device_node *parent)
+{
+ void __iomem *cpu_base;
+ void __iomem *dist_base;
+ int irq;
+ struct irq_domain *domain = &gic_data[gic_cnt].domain;
+
+ if (WARN_ON(!node))
+ return -ENODEV;
+
+ dist_base = of_iomap(node, 0);
+ WARN(!dist_base, "unable to map gic dist registers\n");
+
+ cpu_base = of_iomap(node, 1);
+ WARN(!cpu_base, "unable to map gic cpu registers\n");
+
+ domain->of_node = of_node_get(node);
+
+ gic_init(gic_cnt, 16, dist_base, cpu_base);
+
+ if (parent) {
+ irq = irq_of_parse_and_map(node, 0);
+ gic_cascade_irq(gic_cnt, irq);
+ }
+ gic_cnt++;
+ return 0;
+}
+#endif
diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/hardware/gic.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/hardware/gic.h
index ade84a4..1a776a1 100644
--- a/arch/arm/include/asm/hardware/gic.h
+++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/hardware/gic.h
@@ -39,6 +39,7 @@ extern void __iomem *gic_cpu_base_addr;
extern struct irq_chip gic_arch_extn;
void gic_init(unsigned int, unsigned int, void __iomem *, void __iomem *);
+int gic_of_init(struct device_node *node, struct device_node *parent);
void gic_secondary_init(unsigned int);
void gic_cascade_irq(unsigned int gic_nr, unsigned int irq);
void gic_raise_softirq(const struct cpumask *mask, unsigned int irq);
--
1.7.5.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 53+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 3/3] ARM: gic: add OF based initialization
@ 2011-09-30 19:28 ` Rob Herring
0 siblings, 0 replies; 53+ messages in thread
From: Rob Herring @ 2011-09-30 19:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
From: Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>
This adds ARM gic interrupt controller initialization using device tree
data.
The initialization function is intended to be called by of_irq_init
function like this:
const static struct of_device_id irq_match[] = {
{ .compatible = "arm,cortex-a9-gic", .data = gic_of_init, },
{}
};
static void __init init_irqs(void)
{
of_irq_init(irq_match);
}
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>
---
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/gic.txt | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++++
arch/arm/common/gic.c | 61 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
arch/arm/include/asm/hardware/gic.h | 1 +
3 files changed, 117 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/gic.txt
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/gic.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/gic.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..52916b4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/gic.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,55 @@
+* ARM Generic Interrupt Controller
+
+ARM SMP cores are often associated with a GIC, providing per processor
+interrupts (PPI), shared processor interrupts (SPI) and software
+generated interrupts (SGI).
+
+Primary GIC is attached directly to the CPU and typically has PPIs and SGIs.
+Secondary GICs are cascaded into the upward interrupt controller and do not
+have PPIs or SGIs.
+
+Main node required properties:
+
+- compatible : should be one of:
+ "arm,cortex-a9-gic"
+ "arm,arm11mp-gic"
+- interrupt-controller : Identifies the node as an interrupt controller
+- #interrupt-cells : Specifies the number of cells needed to encode an
+ interrupt source. The type shall be a <u32> and the value shall be 3.
+
+ The 1st cell is the interrupt type; 0 for SPI interrupts, 1 for PPI
+ interrupts.
+
+ The 2nd cell contains the interrupt number for the interrupt type.
+ SPI interrupts are in the range [0-987]. PPI interrupts are in the
+ range [0-15].
+
+ The 3rd cell is the flags, encoded as follows:
+ bits[3:0] trigger type and level flags.
+ 1 = low-to-high edge triggered
+ 2 = high-to-low edge triggered
+ 4 = active high level-sensitive
+ 8 = active low level-sensitive
+ bits[15:8] PPI interrupt cpu mask. Each bit corresponds to each of
+ the 8 possible cpus attached to the GIC. A bit set to '1' indicated
+ the interrupt is wired to that CPU. Only valid for PPI interrupts.
+
+- reg : Specifies base physical address(s) and size of the GIC registers. The
+ first region is the GIC distributor register base and size. The 2nd region is
+ the GIC cpu interface register base and size.
+
+Optional
+- interrupts : Interrupt source of the parent interrupt controller. Only
+ present on secondary GICs.
+
+Example:
+
+ intc: interrupt-controller at fff11000 {
+ compatible = "arm,cortex-a9-gic";
+ #interrupt-cells = <3>;
+ #address-cells = <1>;
+ interrupt-controller;
+ reg = <0xfff11000 0x1000>,
+ <0xfff10100 0x100>;
+ };
+
diff --git a/arch/arm/common/gic.c b/arch/arm/common/gic.c
index 6fbe1db..3e67970 100644
--- a/arch/arm/common/gic.c
+++ b/arch/arm/common/gic.c
@@ -29,6 +29,9 @@
#include <linux/cpu_pm.h>
#include <linux/cpumask.h>
#include <linux/io.h>
+#include <linux/of.h>
+#include <linux/of_address.h>
+#include <linux/of_irq.h>
#include <linux/irqdomain.h>
#include <asm/irq.h>
@@ -518,7 +521,33 @@ static void __init gic_pm_init(struct gic_chip_data *gic)
}
#endif
+#ifdef CONFIG_OF
+static int gic_irq_domain_dt_translate(struct irq_domain *d,
+ struct device_node *controller,
+ const u32 *intspec, unsigned int intsize,
+ unsigned long *out_hwirq, unsigned int *out_type)
+{
+ if (d->of_node != controller)
+ return -EINVAL;
+ if (intsize < 3)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ /* Get the interrupt number and add 16 to skip over SGIs */
+ *out_hwirq = intspec[1] + 16;
+
+ /* For SPIs, we need to add 16 more to get the GIC irq ID number */
+ if (!intspec[0])
+ *out_hwirq += 16;
+
+ *out_type = intspec[2] & IRQ_TYPE_SENSE_MASK;
+ return 0;
+}
+#endif
+
const struct irq_domain_ops gic_irq_domain_ops = {
+#ifdef CONFIG_OF
+ .dt_translate = gic_irq_domain_dt_translate,
+#endif
};
void __init gic_init(unsigned int gic_nr, unsigned int irq_start,
@@ -606,3 +635,35 @@ void gic_raise_softirq(const struct cpumask *mask, unsigned int irq)
writel_relaxed(map << 16 | irq, gic_data[0].dist_base + GIC_DIST_SOFTINT);
}
#endif
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_OF
+static int gic_cnt __initdata = 0;
+
+int __init gic_of_init(struct device_node *node, struct device_node *parent)
+{
+ void __iomem *cpu_base;
+ void __iomem *dist_base;
+ int irq;
+ struct irq_domain *domain = &gic_data[gic_cnt].domain;
+
+ if (WARN_ON(!node))
+ return -ENODEV;
+
+ dist_base = of_iomap(node, 0);
+ WARN(!dist_base, "unable to map gic dist registers\n");
+
+ cpu_base = of_iomap(node, 1);
+ WARN(!cpu_base, "unable to map gic cpu registers\n");
+
+ domain->of_node = of_node_get(node);
+
+ gic_init(gic_cnt, 16, dist_base, cpu_base);
+
+ if (parent) {
+ irq = irq_of_parse_and_map(node, 0);
+ gic_cascade_irq(gic_cnt, irq);
+ }
+ gic_cnt++;
+ return 0;
+}
+#endif
diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/hardware/gic.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/hardware/gic.h
index ade84a4..1a776a1 100644
--- a/arch/arm/include/asm/hardware/gic.h
+++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/hardware/gic.h
@@ -39,6 +39,7 @@ extern void __iomem *gic_cpu_base_addr;
extern struct irq_chip gic_arch_extn;
void gic_init(unsigned int, unsigned int, void __iomem *, void __iomem *);
+int gic_of_init(struct device_node *node, struct device_node *parent);
void gic_secondary_init(unsigned int);
void gic_cascade_irq(unsigned int gic_nr, unsigned int irq);
void gic_raise_softirq(const struct cpumask *mask, unsigned int irq);
--
1.7.5.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 53+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 0/3] GIC OF bindings
@ 2011-10-04 16:15 ` Rob Herring
0 siblings, 0 replies; 53+ messages in thread
From: Rob Herring @ 2011-10-04 16:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: grant.likely
Cc: linux-arm-kernel, devicetree-discuss, linux-kernel, marc.zyngier,
thomas.abraham, jamie, b-cousson, shawn.guo
Grant,
On 09/30/2011 02:27 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
> From: Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>
>
> Another round of GIC devicetree support.
>
> This moves the tracking of the starting hwirq number into the irq domain
> code. Doing this makes hwirq == GIC interrupt ID and simplifies the GIC
> code removing irq_offset.
>
> The full series is available here. This includes Russell's devel-stable and
> for-next branches and Nico's vmalloc branch:
>
> git://git.jdl.com/software/linux-3.0.git gic-v2
>
> Tested on highbank and Realview 11MPCore qemu (2 GICs).
>
> Rob
>
> Rob Herring (3):
> irq: support domains with non-zero hwirq base
> ARM: gic: add irq_domain support
> ARM: gic: add OF based initialization
>
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/gic.txt | 55 ++++++++++
> arch/arm/common/Kconfig | 1 +
> arch/arm/common/gic.c | 142 +++++++++++++++++++------
> arch/arm/include/asm/hardware/gic.h | 5 +-
> include/linux/irqdomain.h | 16 +++-
> kernel/irq/irqdomain.c | 12 +-
> 6 files changed, 189 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/gic.txt
>
Ping. Can you please comment on this series.
Rob
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 53+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 0/3] GIC OF bindings
@ 2011-10-04 16:15 ` Rob Herring
0 siblings, 0 replies; 53+ messages in thread
From: Rob Herring @ 2011-10-04 16:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: grant.likely-s3s/WqlpOiPyB63q8FvJNQ
Cc: devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA,
linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r
Grant,
On 09/30/2011 02:27 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
> From: Rob Herring <rob.herring-bsGFqQB8/DxBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
>
> Another round of GIC devicetree support.
>
> This moves the tracking of the starting hwirq number into the irq domain
> code. Doing this makes hwirq == GIC interrupt ID and simplifies the GIC
> code removing irq_offset.
>
> The full series is available here. This includes Russell's devel-stable and
> for-next branches and Nico's vmalloc branch:
>
> git://git.jdl.com/software/linux-3.0.git gic-v2
>
> Tested on highbank and Realview 11MPCore qemu (2 GICs).
>
> Rob
>
> Rob Herring (3):
> irq: support domains with non-zero hwirq base
> ARM: gic: add irq_domain support
> ARM: gic: add OF based initialization
>
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/gic.txt | 55 ++++++++++
> arch/arm/common/Kconfig | 1 +
> arch/arm/common/gic.c | 142 +++++++++++++++++++------
> arch/arm/include/asm/hardware/gic.h | 5 +-
> include/linux/irqdomain.h | 16 +++-
> kernel/irq/irqdomain.c | 12 +-
> 6 files changed, 189 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/gic.txt
>
Ping. Can you please comment on this series.
Rob
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 53+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 0/3] GIC OF bindings
@ 2011-10-04 16:15 ` Rob Herring
0 siblings, 0 replies; 53+ messages in thread
From: Rob Herring @ 2011-10-04 16:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
Grant,
On 09/30/2011 02:27 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
> From: Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>
>
> Another round of GIC devicetree support.
>
> This moves the tracking of the starting hwirq number into the irq domain
> code. Doing this makes hwirq == GIC interrupt ID and simplifies the GIC
> code removing irq_offset.
>
> The full series is available here. This includes Russell's devel-stable and
> for-next branches and Nico's vmalloc branch:
>
> git://git.jdl.com/software/linux-3.0.git gic-v2
>
> Tested on highbank and Realview 11MPCore qemu (2 GICs).
>
> Rob
>
> Rob Herring (3):
> irq: support domains with non-zero hwirq base
> ARM: gic: add irq_domain support
> ARM: gic: add OF based initialization
>
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/gic.txt | 55 ++++++++++
> arch/arm/common/Kconfig | 1 +
> arch/arm/common/gic.c | 142 +++++++++++++++++++------
> arch/arm/include/asm/hardware/gic.h | 5 +-
> include/linux/irqdomain.h | 16 +++-
> kernel/irq/irqdomain.c | 12 +-
> 6 files changed, 189 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/gic.txt
>
Ping. Can you please comment on this series.
Rob
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 53+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/3] irq: support domains with non-zero hwirq base
2011-09-30 19:27 ` Rob Herring
@ 2011-10-04 23:39 ` Grant Likely
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 53+ messages in thread
From: Grant Likely @ 2011-10-04 23:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rob Herring
Cc: linux-arm-kernel, devicetree-discuss, linux-kernel, marc.zyngier,
thomas.abraham, jamie, b-cousson, shawn.guo, Rob Herring,
Thomas Gleixner
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 02:27:58PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> From: Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>
>
> Interrupt controllers can have non-zero starting value for h/w irq numbers.
> Adding support in irq_domain allows the domain hwirq numbering to match
> the interrupt controllers' numbering.
>
> As this makes looping over irqs for a domain more complicated, add loop
> iterators to iterate over all hwirqs and irqs for a domain.
>
> Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>
> ---
> include/linux/irqdomain.h | 16 +++++++++++++++-
> kernel/irq/irqdomain.c | 12 ++++++------
> 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/irqdomain.h b/include/linux/irqdomain.h
> index 3ad553e..c0026b6 100644
> --- a/include/linux/irqdomain.h
> +++ b/include/linux/irqdomain.h
> @@ -47,6 +47,7 @@ struct irq_domain_ops {
> * of the irq_domain is responsible for allocating the array of
> * irq_desc structures.
> * @nr_irq: Number of irqs managed by the irq domain
> + * @hwirq_base: Starting number for hwirqs managed by the irq domain
> * @ops: pointer to irq_domain methods
> * @priv: private data pointer for use by owner. Not touched by irq_domain
> * core code.
> @@ -57,6 +58,7 @@ struct irq_domain {
> struct list_head list;
> unsigned int irq_base;
> unsigned int nr_irq;
> + unsigned int hwirq_base;
> const struct irq_domain_ops *ops;
> void *priv;
> struct device_node *of_node;
> @@ -72,9 +74,21 @@ struct irq_domain {
> static inline unsigned int irq_domain_to_irq(struct irq_domain *d,
> unsigned long hwirq)
> {
> - return d->ops->to_irq ? d->ops->to_irq(d, hwirq) : d->irq_base + hwirq;
> + if (d->ops->to_irq)
> + return d->ops->to_irq(d, hwirq);
> + if (hwirq < d->hwirq_base)
> + return NO_IRQ;
NO_IRQ is probably not available on x86. Also, if this condition
is hit then something is definitely wrong. You should WARN() and
return 0.
Otherwise looks good and you can add my a-b:
Acked-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 53+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 1/3] irq: support domains with non-zero hwirq base
@ 2011-10-04 23:39 ` Grant Likely
0 siblings, 0 replies; 53+ messages in thread
From: Grant Likely @ 2011-10-04 23:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 02:27:58PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> From: Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>
>
> Interrupt controllers can have non-zero starting value for h/w irq numbers.
> Adding support in irq_domain allows the domain hwirq numbering to match
> the interrupt controllers' numbering.
>
> As this makes looping over irqs for a domain more complicated, add loop
> iterators to iterate over all hwirqs and irqs for a domain.
>
> Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>
> ---
> include/linux/irqdomain.h | 16 +++++++++++++++-
> kernel/irq/irqdomain.c | 12 ++++++------
> 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/irqdomain.h b/include/linux/irqdomain.h
> index 3ad553e..c0026b6 100644
> --- a/include/linux/irqdomain.h
> +++ b/include/linux/irqdomain.h
> @@ -47,6 +47,7 @@ struct irq_domain_ops {
> * of the irq_domain is responsible for allocating the array of
> * irq_desc structures.
> * @nr_irq: Number of irqs managed by the irq domain
> + * @hwirq_base: Starting number for hwirqs managed by the irq domain
> * @ops: pointer to irq_domain methods
> * @priv: private data pointer for use by owner. Not touched by irq_domain
> * core code.
> @@ -57,6 +58,7 @@ struct irq_domain {
> struct list_head list;
> unsigned int irq_base;
> unsigned int nr_irq;
> + unsigned int hwirq_base;
> const struct irq_domain_ops *ops;
> void *priv;
> struct device_node *of_node;
> @@ -72,9 +74,21 @@ struct irq_domain {
> static inline unsigned int irq_domain_to_irq(struct irq_domain *d,
> unsigned long hwirq)
> {
> - return d->ops->to_irq ? d->ops->to_irq(d, hwirq) : d->irq_base + hwirq;
> + if (d->ops->to_irq)
> + return d->ops->to_irq(d, hwirq);
> + if (hwirq < d->hwirq_base)
> + return NO_IRQ;
NO_IRQ is probably not available on x86. Also, if this condition
is hit then something is definitely wrong. You should WARN() and
return 0.
Otherwise looks good and you can add my a-b:
Acked-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 53+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 2/3] ARM: gic: add irq_domain support
2011-09-30 19:27 ` Rob Herring
@ 2011-10-04 23:41 ` Grant Likely
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 53+ messages in thread
From: Grant Likely @ 2011-10-04 23:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rob Herring
Cc: linux-arm-kernel, devicetree-discuss, linux-kernel, marc.zyngier,
thomas.abraham, jamie, b-cousson, shawn.guo, Rob Herring
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 02:27:59PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> From: Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>
>
> Convert the gic interrupt controller to use irq domains in preparation
> for device-tree binding and MULTI_IRQ. This allows for translation between
> GIC interrupt IDs and Linux irq numbers.
>
> The meaning of irq_offset has changed. It now is just the number of skipped
> GIC interrupt IDs for the controller. It will be 16 for primary GIC and 32
> for secondary GICs.
>
> Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/common/Kconfig | 1 +
> arch/arm/common/gic.c | 81 ++++++++++++++++++++---------------
> arch/arm/include/asm/hardware/gic.h | 4 +-
> 3 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/common/Kconfig b/arch/arm/common/Kconfig
> index 4b71766..74df9ca 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/common/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm/common/Kconfig
> @@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
> config ARM_GIC
> + select IRQ_DOMAIN
> bool
>
> config ARM_VIC
> diff --git a/arch/arm/common/gic.c b/arch/arm/common/gic.c
> index 8b5be72..6fbe1db 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/common/gic.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/common/gic.c
> @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@
> #include <linux/cpu_pm.h>
> #include <linux/cpumask.h>
> #include <linux/io.h>
> +#include <linux/irqdomain.h>
>
> #include <asm/irq.h>
> #include <asm/mach/irq.h>
> @@ -72,8 +73,7 @@ static inline void __iomem *gic_cpu_base(struct irq_data *d)
>
> static inline unsigned int gic_irq(struct irq_data *d)
> {
> - struct gic_chip_data *gic_data = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
> - return d->irq - gic_data->irq_offset;
> + return d->hwirq;
> }
Nit: Personally, I'd just drop gic_irq() entirely and reference
d->hwirq directly. However, it isn't enough to withhold my a-b.
Acked-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
>
> /*
> @@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ static inline unsigned int gic_irq(struct irq_data *d)
> */
> static void gic_mask_irq(struct irq_data *d)
> {
> - u32 mask = 1 << (d->irq % 32);
> + u32 mask = 1 << (gic_irq(d) % 32);
>
> spin_lock(&irq_controller_lock);
> writel_relaxed(mask, gic_dist_base(d) + GIC_DIST_ENABLE_CLEAR + (gic_irq(d) / 32) * 4);
> @@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ static void gic_mask_irq(struct irq_data *d)
>
> static void gic_unmask_irq(struct irq_data *d)
> {
> - u32 mask = 1 << (d->irq % 32);
> + u32 mask = 1 << (gic_irq(d) % 32);
>
> spin_lock(&irq_controller_lock);
> if (gic_arch_extn.irq_unmask)
> @@ -173,7 +173,7 @@ static int gic_set_affinity(struct irq_data *d, const struct cpumask *mask_val,
> bool force)
> {
> void __iomem *reg = gic_dist_base(d) + GIC_DIST_TARGET + (gic_irq(d) & ~3);
> - unsigned int shift = (d->irq % 4) * 8;
> + unsigned int shift = (gic_irq(d) % 4) * 8;
> unsigned int cpu = cpumask_any_and(mask_val, cpu_online_mask);
> u32 val, mask, bit;
>
> @@ -224,7 +224,7 @@ static void gic_handle_cascade_irq(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc)
> if (gic_irq == 1023)
> goto out;
>
> - cascade_irq = gic_irq + chip_data->irq_offset;
> + cascade_irq = irq_domain_to_irq(&chip_data->domain, gic_irq);
> if (unlikely(gic_irq < 32 || gic_irq > 1020 || cascade_irq >= NR_IRQS))
> do_bad_IRQ(cascade_irq, desc);
> else
> @@ -256,10 +256,11 @@ void __init gic_cascade_irq(unsigned int gic_nr, unsigned int irq)
> irq_set_chained_handler(irq, gic_handle_cascade_irq);
> }
>
> -static void __init gic_dist_init(struct gic_chip_data *gic,
> - unsigned int irq_start)
> +static void __init gic_dist_init(struct gic_chip_data *gic)
> {
> - unsigned int gic_irqs, irq_limit, i;
> + unsigned int gic_irqs = gic->gic_irqs;
> + struct irq_domain *domain = &gic->domain;
> + unsigned int i, irq;
> u32 cpumask;
> void __iomem *base = gic->dist_base;
> u32 cpu = 0;
> @@ -275,17 +276,6 @@ static void __init gic_dist_init(struct gic_chip_data *gic,
> writel_relaxed(0, base + GIC_DIST_CTRL);
>
> /*
> - * Find out how many interrupts are supported.
> - * The GIC only supports up to 1020 interrupt sources.
> - */
> - gic_irqs = readl_relaxed(base + GIC_DIST_CTR) & 0x1f;
> - gic_irqs = (gic_irqs + 1) * 32;
> - if (gic_irqs > 1020)
> - gic_irqs = 1020;
> -
> - gic->gic_irqs = gic_irqs;
> -
> - /*
> * Set all global interrupts to be level triggered, active low.
> */
> for (i = 32; i < gic_irqs; i += 16)
> @@ -311,19 +301,12 @@ static void __init gic_dist_init(struct gic_chip_data *gic,
> writel_relaxed(0xffffffff, base + GIC_DIST_ENABLE_CLEAR + i * 4 / 32);
>
> /*
> - * Limit number of interrupts registered to the platform maximum
> - */
> - irq_limit = gic->irq_offset + gic_irqs;
> - if (WARN_ON(irq_limit > NR_IRQS))
> - irq_limit = NR_IRQS;
> -
> - /*
> * Setup the Linux IRQ subsystem.
> */
> - for (i = irq_start; i < irq_limit; i++) {
> - irq_set_chip_and_handler(i, &gic_chip, handle_fasteoi_irq);
> - irq_set_chip_data(i, gic);
> - set_irq_flags(i, IRQF_VALID | IRQF_PROBE);
> + irq_domain_for_each_irq(domain, i, irq) {
> + irq_set_chip_and_handler(irq, &gic_chip, handle_fasteoi_irq);
> + irq_set_chip_data(irq, gic);
> + set_irq_flags(irq, IRQF_VALID | IRQF_PROBE);
> }
>
> writel_relaxed(1, base + GIC_DIST_CTRL);
> @@ -535,23 +518,53 @@ static void __init gic_pm_init(struct gic_chip_data *gic)
> }
> #endif
>
> +const struct irq_domain_ops gic_irq_domain_ops = {
> +};
> +
> void __init gic_init(unsigned int gic_nr, unsigned int irq_start,
> void __iomem *dist_base, void __iomem *cpu_base)
> {
> struct gic_chip_data *gic;
> + struct irq_domain *domain;
> + int gic_irqs;
>
> BUG_ON(gic_nr >= MAX_GIC_NR);
>
> gic = &gic_data[gic_nr];
> + domain = &gic->domain;
> gic->dist_base = dist_base;
> gic->cpu_base = cpu_base;
> - gic->irq_offset = (irq_start - 1) & ~31;
>
> - if (gic_nr == 0)
> + /*
> + * For primary GICs, skip over SGIs.
> + * For secondary GICs, skip over PPIs, too.
> + */
> + if (gic_nr == 0) {
> gic_cpu_base_addr = cpu_base;
> + domain->hwirq_base = 16;
> + irq_start = (irq_start & ~31) + 16;
> + } else
> + domain->hwirq_base = 32;
> +
> + /*
> + * Find out how many interrupts are supported.
> + * The GIC only supports up to 1020 interrupt sources.
> + */
> + gic_irqs = readl_relaxed(dist_base + GIC_DIST_CTR) & 0x1f;
> + gic_irqs = (gic_irqs + 1) * 32;
> + if (gic_irqs > 1020)
> + gic_irqs = 1020;
> + gic->gic_irqs = gic_irqs;
> +
> + domain->nr_irq = gic_irqs - domain->hwirq_base;
> + domain->irq_base = irq_alloc_descs(-1, irq_start, domain->nr_irq,
> + numa_node_id());
> + domain->priv = gic;
> + domain->ops = &gic_irq_domain_ops;
> + irq_domain_add(domain);
>
> gic_chip.flags |= gic_arch_extn.flags;
> - gic_dist_init(gic, irq_start);
> + gic_dist_init(gic);
> gic_cpu_init(gic);
> gic_pm_init(gic);
> }
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/hardware/gic.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/hardware/gic.h
> index c562705..ade84a4 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/hardware/gic.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/hardware/gic.h
> @@ -33,6 +33,8 @@
> #define GIC_DIST_SOFTINT 0xf00
>
> #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
> +#include <linux/irqdomain.h>
> +
> extern void __iomem *gic_cpu_base_addr;
> extern struct irq_chip gic_arch_extn;
>
> @@ -43,7 +45,6 @@ void gic_raise_softirq(const struct cpumask *mask, unsigned int irq);
> void gic_enable_ppi(unsigned int);
>
> struct gic_chip_data {
> - unsigned int irq_offset;
> void __iomem *dist_base;
> void __iomem *cpu_base;
> #ifdef CONFIG_CPU_PM
> @@ -53,6 +54,7 @@ struct gic_chip_data {
> u32 __percpu *saved_ppi_enable;
> u32 __percpu *saved_ppi_conf;
> #endif
> + struct irq_domain domain;
> unsigned int gic_irqs;
> };
> #endif
> --
> 1.7.5.4
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 53+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2/3] ARM: gic: add irq_domain support
@ 2011-10-04 23:41 ` Grant Likely
0 siblings, 0 replies; 53+ messages in thread
From: Grant Likely @ 2011-10-04 23:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 02:27:59PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> From: Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>
>
> Convert the gic interrupt controller to use irq domains in preparation
> for device-tree binding and MULTI_IRQ. This allows for translation between
> GIC interrupt IDs and Linux irq numbers.
>
> The meaning of irq_offset has changed. It now is just the number of skipped
> GIC interrupt IDs for the controller. It will be 16 for primary GIC and 32
> for secondary GICs.
>
> Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/common/Kconfig | 1 +
> arch/arm/common/gic.c | 81 ++++++++++++++++++++---------------
> arch/arm/include/asm/hardware/gic.h | 4 +-
> 3 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/common/Kconfig b/arch/arm/common/Kconfig
> index 4b71766..74df9ca 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/common/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm/common/Kconfig
> @@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
> config ARM_GIC
> + select IRQ_DOMAIN
> bool
>
> config ARM_VIC
> diff --git a/arch/arm/common/gic.c b/arch/arm/common/gic.c
> index 8b5be72..6fbe1db 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/common/gic.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/common/gic.c
> @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@
> #include <linux/cpu_pm.h>
> #include <linux/cpumask.h>
> #include <linux/io.h>
> +#include <linux/irqdomain.h>
>
> #include <asm/irq.h>
> #include <asm/mach/irq.h>
> @@ -72,8 +73,7 @@ static inline void __iomem *gic_cpu_base(struct irq_data *d)
>
> static inline unsigned int gic_irq(struct irq_data *d)
> {
> - struct gic_chip_data *gic_data = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
> - return d->irq - gic_data->irq_offset;
> + return d->hwirq;
> }
Nit: Personally, I'd just drop gic_irq() entirely and reference
d->hwirq directly. However, it isn't enough to withhold my a-b.
Acked-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
>
> /*
> @@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ static inline unsigned int gic_irq(struct irq_data *d)
> */
> static void gic_mask_irq(struct irq_data *d)
> {
> - u32 mask = 1 << (d->irq % 32);
> + u32 mask = 1 << (gic_irq(d) % 32);
>
> spin_lock(&irq_controller_lock);
> writel_relaxed(mask, gic_dist_base(d) + GIC_DIST_ENABLE_CLEAR + (gic_irq(d) / 32) * 4);
> @@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ static void gic_mask_irq(struct irq_data *d)
>
> static void gic_unmask_irq(struct irq_data *d)
> {
> - u32 mask = 1 << (d->irq % 32);
> + u32 mask = 1 << (gic_irq(d) % 32);
>
> spin_lock(&irq_controller_lock);
> if (gic_arch_extn.irq_unmask)
> @@ -173,7 +173,7 @@ static int gic_set_affinity(struct irq_data *d, const struct cpumask *mask_val,
> bool force)
> {
> void __iomem *reg = gic_dist_base(d) + GIC_DIST_TARGET + (gic_irq(d) & ~3);
> - unsigned int shift = (d->irq % 4) * 8;
> + unsigned int shift = (gic_irq(d) % 4) * 8;
> unsigned int cpu = cpumask_any_and(mask_val, cpu_online_mask);
> u32 val, mask, bit;
>
> @@ -224,7 +224,7 @@ static void gic_handle_cascade_irq(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc)
> if (gic_irq == 1023)
> goto out;
>
> - cascade_irq = gic_irq + chip_data->irq_offset;
> + cascade_irq = irq_domain_to_irq(&chip_data->domain, gic_irq);
> if (unlikely(gic_irq < 32 || gic_irq > 1020 || cascade_irq >= NR_IRQS))
> do_bad_IRQ(cascade_irq, desc);
> else
> @@ -256,10 +256,11 @@ void __init gic_cascade_irq(unsigned int gic_nr, unsigned int irq)
> irq_set_chained_handler(irq, gic_handle_cascade_irq);
> }
>
> -static void __init gic_dist_init(struct gic_chip_data *gic,
> - unsigned int irq_start)
> +static void __init gic_dist_init(struct gic_chip_data *gic)
> {
> - unsigned int gic_irqs, irq_limit, i;
> + unsigned int gic_irqs = gic->gic_irqs;
> + struct irq_domain *domain = &gic->domain;
> + unsigned int i, irq;
> u32 cpumask;
> void __iomem *base = gic->dist_base;
> u32 cpu = 0;
> @@ -275,17 +276,6 @@ static void __init gic_dist_init(struct gic_chip_data *gic,
> writel_relaxed(0, base + GIC_DIST_CTRL);
>
> /*
> - * Find out how many interrupts are supported.
> - * The GIC only supports up to 1020 interrupt sources.
> - */
> - gic_irqs = readl_relaxed(base + GIC_DIST_CTR) & 0x1f;
> - gic_irqs = (gic_irqs + 1) * 32;
> - if (gic_irqs > 1020)
> - gic_irqs = 1020;
> -
> - gic->gic_irqs = gic_irqs;
> -
> - /*
> * Set all global interrupts to be level triggered, active low.
> */
> for (i = 32; i < gic_irqs; i += 16)
> @@ -311,19 +301,12 @@ static void __init gic_dist_init(struct gic_chip_data *gic,
> writel_relaxed(0xffffffff, base + GIC_DIST_ENABLE_CLEAR + i * 4 / 32);
>
> /*
> - * Limit number of interrupts registered to the platform maximum
> - */
> - irq_limit = gic->irq_offset + gic_irqs;
> - if (WARN_ON(irq_limit > NR_IRQS))
> - irq_limit = NR_IRQS;
> -
> - /*
> * Setup the Linux IRQ subsystem.
> */
> - for (i = irq_start; i < irq_limit; i++) {
> - irq_set_chip_and_handler(i, &gic_chip, handle_fasteoi_irq);
> - irq_set_chip_data(i, gic);
> - set_irq_flags(i, IRQF_VALID | IRQF_PROBE);
> + irq_domain_for_each_irq(domain, i, irq) {
> + irq_set_chip_and_handler(irq, &gic_chip, handle_fasteoi_irq);
> + irq_set_chip_data(irq, gic);
> + set_irq_flags(irq, IRQF_VALID | IRQF_PROBE);
> }
>
> writel_relaxed(1, base + GIC_DIST_CTRL);
> @@ -535,23 +518,53 @@ static void __init gic_pm_init(struct gic_chip_data *gic)
> }
> #endif
>
> +const struct irq_domain_ops gic_irq_domain_ops = {
> +};
> +
> void __init gic_init(unsigned int gic_nr, unsigned int irq_start,
> void __iomem *dist_base, void __iomem *cpu_base)
> {
> struct gic_chip_data *gic;
> + struct irq_domain *domain;
> + int gic_irqs;
>
> BUG_ON(gic_nr >= MAX_GIC_NR);
>
> gic = &gic_data[gic_nr];
> + domain = &gic->domain;
> gic->dist_base = dist_base;
> gic->cpu_base = cpu_base;
> - gic->irq_offset = (irq_start - 1) & ~31;
>
> - if (gic_nr == 0)
> + /*
> + * For primary GICs, skip over SGIs.
> + * For secondary GICs, skip over PPIs, too.
> + */
> + if (gic_nr == 0) {
> gic_cpu_base_addr = cpu_base;
> + domain->hwirq_base = 16;
> + irq_start = (irq_start & ~31) + 16;
> + } else
> + domain->hwirq_base = 32;
> +
> + /*
> + * Find out how many interrupts are supported.
> + * The GIC only supports up to 1020 interrupt sources.
> + */
> + gic_irqs = readl_relaxed(dist_base + GIC_DIST_CTR) & 0x1f;
> + gic_irqs = (gic_irqs + 1) * 32;
> + if (gic_irqs > 1020)
> + gic_irqs = 1020;
> + gic->gic_irqs = gic_irqs;
> +
> + domain->nr_irq = gic_irqs - domain->hwirq_base;
> + domain->irq_base = irq_alloc_descs(-1, irq_start, domain->nr_irq,
> + numa_node_id());
> + domain->priv = gic;
> + domain->ops = &gic_irq_domain_ops;
> + irq_domain_add(domain);
>
> gic_chip.flags |= gic_arch_extn.flags;
> - gic_dist_init(gic, irq_start);
> + gic_dist_init(gic);
> gic_cpu_init(gic);
> gic_pm_init(gic);
> }
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/hardware/gic.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/hardware/gic.h
> index c562705..ade84a4 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/hardware/gic.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/hardware/gic.h
> @@ -33,6 +33,8 @@
> #define GIC_DIST_SOFTINT 0xf00
>
> #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
> +#include <linux/irqdomain.h>
> +
> extern void __iomem *gic_cpu_base_addr;
> extern struct irq_chip gic_arch_extn;
>
> @@ -43,7 +45,6 @@ void gic_raise_softirq(const struct cpumask *mask, unsigned int irq);
> void gic_enable_ppi(unsigned int);
>
> struct gic_chip_data {
> - unsigned int irq_offset;
> void __iomem *dist_base;
> void __iomem *cpu_base;
> #ifdef CONFIG_CPU_PM
> @@ -53,6 +54,7 @@ struct gic_chip_data {
> u32 __percpu *saved_ppi_enable;
> u32 __percpu *saved_ppi_conf;
> #endif
> + struct irq_domain domain;
> unsigned int gic_irqs;
> };
> #endif
> --
> 1.7.5.4
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 53+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 3/3] ARM: gic: add OF based initialization
2011-09-30 19:28 ` Rob Herring
@ 2011-10-04 23:44 ` Grant Likely
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 53+ messages in thread
From: Grant Likely @ 2011-10-04 23:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rob Herring
Cc: linux-arm-kernel, devicetree-discuss, linux-kernel, marc.zyngier,
thomas.abraham, jamie, b-cousson, shawn.guo, Rob Herring
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 02:28:00PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> From: Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>
>
> This adds ARM gic interrupt controller initialization using device tree
> data.
>
> The initialization function is intended to be called by of_irq_init
> function like this:
>
> const static struct of_device_id irq_match[] = {
> { .compatible = "arm,cortex-a9-gic", .data = gic_of_init, },
> {}
> };
>
> static void __init init_irqs(void)
> {
> of_irq_init(irq_match);
> }
>
> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>
Acked-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
I think this series is pretty much ready to be merged other than the
comment on patch 1. It should go through either rmk's patch system or
the arm-soc tree, but you'll need an ack from tglx first.
g.
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/gic.txt | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> arch/arm/common/gic.c | 61 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> arch/arm/include/asm/hardware/gic.h | 1 +
> 3 files changed, 117 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/gic.txt
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/gic.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/gic.txt
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..52916b4
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/gic.txt
> @@ -0,0 +1,55 @@
> +* ARM Generic Interrupt Controller
> +
> +ARM SMP cores are often associated with a GIC, providing per processor
> +interrupts (PPI), shared processor interrupts (SPI) and software
> +generated interrupts (SGI).
> +
> +Primary GIC is attached directly to the CPU and typically has PPIs and SGIs.
> +Secondary GICs are cascaded into the upward interrupt controller and do not
> +have PPIs or SGIs.
> +
> +Main node required properties:
> +
> +- compatible : should be one of:
> + "arm,cortex-a9-gic"
> + "arm,arm11mp-gic"
> +- interrupt-controller : Identifies the node as an interrupt controller
> +- #interrupt-cells : Specifies the number of cells needed to encode an
> + interrupt source. The type shall be a <u32> and the value shall be 3.
> +
> + The 1st cell is the interrupt type; 0 for SPI interrupts, 1 for PPI
> + interrupts.
> +
> + The 2nd cell contains the interrupt number for the interrupt type.
> + SPI interrupts are in the range [0-987]. PPI interrupts are in the
> + range [0-15].
> +
> + The 3rd cell is the flags, encoded as follows:
> + bits[3:0] trigger type and level flags.
> + 1 = low-to-high edge triggered
> + 2 = high-to-low edge triggered
> + 4 = active high level-sensitive
> + 8 = active low level-sensitive
> + bits[15:8] PPI interrupt cpu mask. Each bit corresponds to each of
> + the 8 possible cpus attached to the GIC. A bit set to '1' indicated
> + the interrupt is wired to that CPU. Only valid for PPI interrupts.
> +
> +- reg : Specifies base physical address(s) and size of the GIC registers. The
> + first region is the GIC distributor register base and size. The 2nd region is
> + the GIC cpu interface register base and size.
> +
> +Optional
> +- interrupts : Interrupt source of the parent interrupt controller. Only
> + present on secondary GICs.
> +
> +Example:
> +
> + intc: interrupt-controller@fff11000 {
> + compatible = "arm,cortex-a9-gic";
> + #interrupt-cells = <3>;
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + interrupt-controller;
> + reg = <0xfff11000 0x1000>,
> + <0xfff10100 0x100>;
> + };
> +
> diff --git a/arch/arm/common/gic.c b/arch/arm/common/gic.c
> index 6fbe1db..3e67970 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/common/gic.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/common/gic.c
> @@ -29,6 +29,9 @@
> #include <linux/cpu_pm.h>
> #include <linux/cpumask.h>
> #include <linux/io.h>
> +#include <linux/of.h>
> +#include <linux/of_address.h>
> +#include <linux/of_irq.h>
> #include <linux/irqdomain.h>
>
> #include <asm/irq.h>
> @@ -518,7 +521,33 @@ static void __init gic_pm_init(struct gic_chip_data *gic)
> }
> #endif
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_OF
> +static int gic_irq_domain_dt_translate(struct irq_domain *d,
> + struct device_node *controller,
> + const u32 *intspec, unsigned int intsize,
> + unsigned long *out_hwirq, unsigned int *out_type)
> +{
> + if (d->of_node != controller)
> + return -EINVAL;
> + if (intsize < 3)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + /* Get the interrupt number and add 16 to skip over SGIs */
> + *out_hwirq = intspec[1] + 16;
> +
> + /* For SPIs, we need to add 16 more to get the GIC irq ID number */
> + if (!intspec[0])
> + *out_hwirq += 16;
> +
> + *out_type = intspec[2] & IRQ_TYPE_SENSE_MASK;
> + return 0;
> +}
> +#endif
> +
> const struct irq_domain_ops gic_irq_domain_ops = {
> +#ifdef CONFIG_OF
> + .dt_translate = gic_irq_domain_dt_translate,
> +#endif
> };
>
> void __init gic_init(unsigned int gic_nr, unsigned int irq_start,
> @@ -606,3 +635,35 @@ void gic_raise_softirq(const struct cpumask *mask, unsigned int irq)
> writel_relaxed(map << 16 | irq, gic_data[0].dist_base + GIC_DIST_SOFTINT);
> }
> #endif
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_OF
> +static int gic_cnt __initdata = 0;
> +
> +int __init gic_of_init(struct device_node *node, struct device_node *parent)
> +{
> + void __iomem *cpu_base;
> + void __iomem *dist_base;
> + int irq;
> + struct irq_domain *domain = &gic_data[gic_cnt].domain;
> +
> + if (WARN_ON(!node))
> + return -ENODEV;
> +
> + dist_base = of_iomap(node, 0);
> + WARN(!dist_base, "unable to map gic dist registers\n");
> +
> + cpu_base = of_iomap(node, 1);
> + WARN(!cpu_base, "unable to map gic cpu registers\n");
> +
> + domain->of_node = of_node_get(node);
> +
> + gic_init(gic_cnt, 16, dist_base, cpu_base);
> +
> + if (parent) {
> + irq = irq_of_parse_and_map(node, 0);
> + gic_cascade_irq(gic_cnt, irq);
> + }
> + gic_cnt++;
> + return 0;
> +}
> +#endif
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/hardware/gic.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/hardware/gic.h
> index ade84a4..1a776a1 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/hardware/gic.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/hardware/gic.h
> @@ -39,6 +39,7 @@ extern void __iomem *gic_cpu_base_addr;
> extern struct irq_chip gic_arch_extn;
>
> void gic_init(unsigned int, unsigned int, void __iomem *, void __iomem *);
> +int gic_of_init(struct device_node *node, struct device_node *parent);
> void gic_secondary_init(unsigned int);
> void gic_cascade_irq(unsigned int gic_nr, unsigned int irq);
> void gic_raise_softirq(const struct cpumask *mask, unsigned int irq);
> --
> 1.7.5.4
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 53+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 3/3] ARM: gic: add OF based initialization
@ 2011-10-04 23:44 ` Grant Likely
0 siblings, 0 replies; 53+ messages in thread
From: Grant Likely @ 2011-10-04 23:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 02:28:00PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> From: Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>
>
> This adds ARM gic interrupt controller initialization using device tree
> data.
>
> The initialization function is intended to be called by of_irq_init
> function like this:
>
> const static struct of_device_id irq_match[] = {
> { .compatible = "arm,cortex-a9-gic", .data = gic_of_init, },
> {}
> };
>
> static void __init init_irqs(void)
> {
> of_irq_init(irq_match);
> }
>
> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>
Acked-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
I think this series is pretty much ready to be merged other than the
comment on patch 1. It should go through either rmk's patch system or
the arm-soc tree, but you'll need an ack from tglx first.
g.
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/gic.txt | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> arch/arm/common/gic.c | 61 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> arch/arm/include/asm/hardware/gic.h | 1 +
> 3 files changed, 117 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/gic.txt
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/gic.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/gic.txt
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..52916b4
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/gic.txt
> @@ -0,0 +1,55 @@
> +* ARM Generic Interrupt Controller
> +
> +ARM SMP cores are often associated with a GIC, providing per processor
> +interrupts (PPI), shared processor interrupts (SPI) and software
> +generated interrupts (SGI).
> +
> +Primary GIC is attached directly to the CPU and typically has PPIs and SGIs.
> +Secondary GICs are cascaded into the upward interrupt controller and do not
> +have PPIs or SGIs.
> +
> +Main node required properties:
> +
> +- compatible : should be one of:
> + "arm,cortex-a9-gic"
> + "arm,arm11mp-gic"
> +- interrupt-controller : Identifies the node as an interrupt controller
> +- #interrupt-cells : Specifies the number of cells needed to encode an
> + interrupt source. The type shall be a <u32> and the value shall be 3.
> +
> + The 1st cell is the interrupt type; 0 for SPI interrupts, 1 for PPI
> + interrupts.
> +
> + The 2nd cell contains the interrupt number for the interrupt type.
> + SPI interrupts are in the range [0-987]. PPI interrupts are in the
> + range [0-15].
> +
> + The 3rd cell is the flags, encoded as follows:
> + bits[3:0] trigger type and level flags.
> + 1 = low-to-high edge triggered
> + 2 = high-to-low edge triggered
> + 4 = active high level-sensitive
> + 8 = active low level-sensitive
> + bits[15:8] PPI interrupt cpu mask. Each bit corresponds to each of
> + the 8 possible cpus attached to the GIC. A bit set to '1' indicated
> + the interrupt is wired to that CPU. Only valid for PPI interrupts.
> +
> +- reg : Specifies base physical address(s) and size of the GIC registers. The
> + first region is the GIC distributor register base and size. The 2nd region is
> + the GIC cpu interface register base and size.
> +
> +Optional
> +- interrupts : Interrupt source of the parent interrupt controller. Only
> + present on secondary GICs.
> +
> +Example:
> +
> + intc: interrupt-controller at fff11000 {
> + compatible = "arm,cortex-a9-gic";
> + #interrupt-cells = <3>;
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + interrupt-controller;
> + reg = <0xfff11000 0x1000>,
> + <0xfff10100 0x100>;
> + };
> +
> diff --git a/arch/arm/common/gic.c b/arch/arm/common/gic.c
> index 6fbe1db..3e67970 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/common/gic.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/common/gic.c
> @@ -29,6 +29,9 @@
> #include <linux/cpu_pm.h>
> #include <linux/cpumask.h>
> #include <linux/io.h>
> +#include <linux/of.h>
> +#include <linux/of_address.h>
> +#include <linux/of_irq.h>
> #include <linux/irqdomain.h>
>
> #include <asm/irq.h>
> @@ -518,7 +521,33 @@ static void __init gic_pm_init(struct gic_chip_data *gic)
> }
> #endif
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_OF
> +static int gic_irq_domain_dt_translate(struct irq_domain *d,
> + struct device_node *controller,
> + const u32 *intspec, unsigned int intsize,
> + unsigned long *out_hwirq, unsigned int *out_type)
> +{
> + if (d->of_node != controller)
> + return -EINVAL;
> + if (intsize < 3)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + /* Get the interrupt number and add 16 to skip over SGIs */
> + *out_hwirq = intspec[1] + 16;
> +
> + /* For SPIs, we need to add 16 more to get the GIC irq ID number */
> + if (!intspec[0])
> + *out_hwirq += 16;
> +
> + *out_type = intspec[2] & IRQ_TYPE_SENSE_MASK;
> + return 0;
> +}
> +#endif
> +
> const struct irq_domain_ops gic_irq_domain_ops = {
> +#ifdef CONFIG_OF
> + .dt_translate = gic_irq_domain_dt_translate,
> +#endif
> };
>
> void __init gic_init(unsigned int gic_nr, unsigned int irq_start,
> @@ -606,3 +635,35 @@ void gic_raise_softirq(const struct cpumask *mask, unsigned int irq)
> writel_relaxed(map << 16 | irq, gic_data[0].dist_base + GIC_DIST_SOFTINT);
> }
> #endif
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_OF
> +static int gic_cnt __initdata = 0;
> +
> +int __init gic_of_init(struct device_node *node, struct device_node *parent)
> +{
> + void __iomem *cpu_base;
> + void __iomem *dist_base;
> + int irq;
> + struct irq_domain *domain = &gic_data[gic_cnt].domain;
> +
> + if (WARN_ON(!node))
> + return -ENODEV;
> +
> + dist_base = of_iomap(node, 0);
> + WARN(!dist_base, "unable to map gic dist registers\n");
> +
> + cpu_base = of_iomap(node, 1);
> + WARN(!cpu_base, "unable to map gic cpu registers\n");
> +
> + domain->of_node = of_node_get(node);
> +
> + gic_init(gic_cnt, 16, dist_base, cpu_base);
> +
> + if (parent) {
> + irq = irq_of_parse_and_map(node, 0);
> + gic_cascade_irq(gic_cnt, irq);
> + }
> + gic_cnt++;
> + return 0;
> +}
> +#endif
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/hardware/gic.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/hardware/gic.h
> index ade84a4..1a776a1 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/hardware/gic.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/hardware/gic.h
> @@ -39,6 +39,7 @@ extern void __iomem *gic_cpu_base_addr;
> extern struct irq_chip gic_arch_extn;
>
> void gic_init(unsigned int, unsigned int, void __iomem *, void __iomem *);
> +int gic_of_init(struct device_node *node, struct device_node *parent);
> void gic_secondary_init(unsigned int);
> void gic_cascade_irq(unsigned int gic_nr, unsigned int irq);
> void gic_raise_softirq(const struct cpumask *mask, unsigned int irq);
> --
> 1.7.5.4
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 53+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2] irq: support domains with non-zero hwirq base
2011-10-04 23:39 ` Grant Likely
@ 2011-10-05 2:56 ` Rob Herring
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 53+ messages in thread
From: Rob Herring @ 2011-10-05 2:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: grant.likely, Thomas Gleixner; +Cc: linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel, Rob Herring
From: Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>
Interrupt controllers can have non-zero starting value for h/w irq numbers.
Adding support in irq_domain allows the domain hwirq numbering to match
the interrupt controllers' numbering.
As this makes looping over irqs for a domain more complicated, add loop
iterators to iterate over all hwirqs and irqs for a domain.
Acked-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>
---
Thomas,
Please ack. I'm dependent on this for adding Calxeda highbank support, so
I'd like to take this thru arm-soc tree.
v2:
- Rebase to tglx's changes in my previous irq domain commit:
irq: Fix check for already initialized irq_domain in irq_domain_add
- drop NO_IRQ and add WARN_ON in irq_domain_to_irq
Rob
include/linux/irqdomain.h | 16 +++++++++++++++-
kernel/irq/irqdomain.c | 12 ++++++------
2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/irqdomain.h b/include/linux/irqdomain.h
index 3ad553e..99834e58 100644
--- a/include/linux/irqdomain.h
+++ b/include/linux/irqdomain.h
@@ -47,6 +47,7 @@ struct irq_domain_ops {
* of the irq_domain is responsible for allocating the array of
* irq_desc structures.
* @nr_irq: Number of irqs managed by the irq domain
+ * @hwirq_base: Starting number for hwirqs managed by the irq domain
* @ops: pointer to irq_domain methods
* @priv: private data pointer for use by owner. Not touched by irq_domain
* core code.
@@ -57,6 +58,7 @@ struct irq_domain {
struct list_head list;
unsigned int irq_base;
unsigned int nr_irq;
+ unsigned int hwirq_base;
const struct irq_domain_ops *ops;
void *priv;
struct device_node *of_node;
@@ -72,9 +74,21 @@ struct irq_domain {
static inline unsigned int irq_domain_to_irq(struct irq_domain *d,
unsigned long hwirq)
{
- return d->ops->to_irq ? d->ops->to_irq(d, hwirq) : d->irq_base + hwirq;
+ if (d->ops->to_irq)
+ return d->ops->to_irq(d, hwirq);
+ if (WARN_ON(hwirq < d->hwirq_base))
+ return 0;
+ return d->irq_base + hwirq - d->hwirq_base;
}
+#define irq_domain_for_each_hwirq(d, hw) \
+ for (hw = d->hwirq_base; hw < d->hwirq_base + d->nr_irq; hw++)
+
+#define irq_domain_for_each_irq(d, hw, irq) \
+ for (hw = d->hwirq_base, irq = irq_domain_to_irq(d, hw); \
+ hw < d->hwirq_base + d->nr_irq; \
+ hw++, irq = irq_domain_to_irq(d, hw))
+
extern void irq_domain_add(struct irq_domain *domain);
extern void irq_domain_del(struct irq_domain *domain);
#endif /* CONFIG_IRQ_DOMAIN */
diff --git a/kernel/irq/irqdomain.c b/kernel/irq/irqdomain.c
index b57a377..200ce83 100644
--- a/kernel/irq/irqdomain.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/irqdomain.c
@@ -20,15 +20,15 @@ static DEFINE_MUTEX(irq_domain_mutex);
void irq_domain_add(struct irq_domain *domain)
{
struct irq_data *d;
- int hwirq;
+ int hwirq, irq;
/*
* This assumes that the irq_domain owner has already allocated
* the irq_descs. This block will be removed when support for dynamic
* allocation of irq_descs is added to irq_domain.
*/
- for (hwirq = 0; hwirq < domain->nr_irq; hwirq++) {
- d = irq_get_irq_data(irq_domain_to_irq(domain, hwirq));
+ irq_domain_for_each_irq(domain, hwirq, irq) {
+ d = irq_get_irq_data(irq);
if (!d) {
WARN(1, "error: assigning domain to non existant irq_desc");
return;
@@ -54,15 +54,15 @@ void irq_domain_add(struct irq_domain *domain)
void irq_domain_del(struct irq_domain *domain)
{
struct irq_data *d;
- int hwirq;
+ int hwirq, irq;
mutex_lock(&irq_domain_mutex);
list_del(&domain->list);
mutex_unlock(&irq_domain_mutex);
/* Clear the irq_domain assignments */
- for (hwirq = 0; hwirq < domain->nr_irq; hwirq++) {
- d = irq_get_irq_data(irq_domain_to_irq(domain, hwirq));
+ irq_domain_for_each_irq(domain, hwirq, irq) {
+ d = irq_get_irq_data(irq);
d->domain = NULL;
}
}
--
1.7.5.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 53+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2] irq: support domains with non-zero hwirq base
@ 2011-10-05 2:56 ` Rob Herring
0 siblings, 0 replies; 53+ messages in thread
From: Rob Herring @ 2011-10-05 2:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
From: Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>
Interrupt controllers can have non-zero starting value for h/w irq numbers.
Adding support in irq_domain allows the domain hwirq numbering to match
the interrupt controllers' numbering.
As this makes looping over irqs for a domain more complicated, add loop
iterators to iterate over all hwirqs and irqs for a domain.
Acked-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>
---
Thomas,
Please ack. I'm dependent on this for adding Calxeda highbank support, so
I'd like to take this thru arm-soc tree.
v2:
- Rebase to tglx's changes in my previous irq domain commit:
irq: Fix check for already initialized irq_domain in irq_domain_add
- drop NO_IRQ and add WARN_ON in irq_domain_to_irq
Rob
include/linux/irqdomain.h | 16 +++++++++++++++-
kernel/irq/irqdomain.c | 12 ++++++------
2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/irqdomain.h b/include/linux/irqdomain.h
index 3ad553e..99834e58 100644
--- a/include/linux/irqdomain.h
+++ b/include/linux/irqdomain.h
@@ -47,6 +47,7 @@ struct irq_domain_ops {
* of the irq_domain is responsible for allocating the array of
* irq_desc structures.
* @nr_irq: Number of irqs managed by the irq domain
+ * @hwirq_base: Starting number for hwirqs managed by the irq domain
* @ops: pointer to irq_domain methods
* @priv: private data pointer for use by owner. Not touched by irq_domain
* core code.
@@ -57,6 +58,7 @@ struct irq_domain {
struct list_head list;
unsigned int irq_base;
unsigned int nr_irq;
+ unsigned int hwirq_base;
const struct irq_domain_ops *ops;
void *priv;
struct device_node *of_node;
@@ -72,9 +74,21 @@ struct irq_domain {
static inline unsigned int irq_domain_to_irq(struct irq_domain *d,
unsigned long hwirq)
{
- return d->ops->to_irq ? d->ops->to_irq(d, hwirq) : d->irq_base + hwirq;
+ if (d->ops->to_irq)
+ return d->ops->to_irq(d, hwirq);
+ if (WARN_ON(hwirq < d->hwirq_base))
+ return 0;
+ return d->irq_base + hwirq - d->hwirq_base;
}
+#define irq_domain_for_each_hwirq(d, hw) \
+ for (hw = d->hwirq_base; hw < d->hwirq_base + d->nr_irq; hw++)
+
+#define irq_domain_for_each_irq(d, hw, irq) \
+ for (hw = d->hwirq_base, irq = irq_domain_to_irq(d, hw); \
+ hw < d->hwirq_base + d->nr_irq; \
+ hw++, irq = irq_domain_to_irq(d, hw))
+
extern void irq_domain_add(struct irq_domain *domain);
extern void irq_domain_del(struct irq_domain *domain);
#endif /* CONFIG_IRQ_DOMAIN */
diff --git a/kernel/irq/irqdomain.c b/kernel/irq/irqdomain.c
index b57a377..200ce83 100644
--- a/kernel/irq/irqdomain.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/irqdomain.c
@@ -20,15 +20,15 @@ static DEFINE_MUTEX(irq_domain_mutex);
void irq_domain_add(struct irq_domain *domain)
{
struct irq_data *d;
- int hwirq;
+ int hwirq, irq;
/*
* This assumes that the irq_domain owner has already allocated
* the irq_descs. This block will be removed when support for dynamic
* allocation of irq_descs is added to irq_domain.
*/
- for (hwirq = 0; hwirq < domain->nr_irq; hwirq++) {
- d = irq_get_irq_data(irq_domain_to_irq(domain, hwirq));
+ irq_domain_for_each_irq(domain, hwirq, irq) {
+ d = irq_get_irq_data(irq);
if (!d) {
WARN(1, "error: assigning domain to non existant irq_desc");
return;
@@ -54,15 +54,15 @@ void irq_domain_add(struct irq_domain *domain)
void irq_domain_del(struct irq_domain *domain)
{
struct irq_data *d;
- int hwirq;
+ int hwirq, irq;
mutex_lock(&irq_domain_mutex);
list_del(&domain->list);
mutex_unlock(&irq_domain_mutex);
/* Clear the irq_domain assignments */
- for (hwirq = 0; hwirq < domain->nr_irq; hwirq++) {
- d = irq_get_irq_data(irq_domain_to_irq(domain, hwirq));
+ irq_domain_for_each_irq(domain, hwirq, irq) {
+ d = irq_get_irq_data(irq);
d->domain = NULL;
}
}
--
1.7.5.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 53+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 0/3] GIC OF bindings
2011-09-30 19:27 ` Rob Herring
@ 2011-10-08 14:04 ` Thomas Abraham
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 53+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Abraham @ 2011-10-08 14:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rob Herring
Cc: linux-arm-kernel, devicetree-discuss, linux-kernel, grant.likely,
marc.zyngier, jamie, b-cousson, shawn.guo, Rob Herring
On 1 October 2011 00:57, Rob Herring <robherring2@gmail.com> wrote:
> From: Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>
>
> Another round of GIC devicetree support.
>
> This moves the tracking of the starting hwirq number into the irq domain
> code. Doing this makes hwirq == GIC interrupt ID and simplifies the GIC
> code removing irq_offset.
>
> The full series is available here. This includes Russell's devel-stable and
> for-next branches and Nico's vmalloc branch:
>
> git://git.jdl.com/software/linux-3.0.git gic-v2
>
> Tested on highbank and Realview 11MPCore qemu (2 GICs).
>
> Rob
>
> Rob Herring (3):
> irq: support domains with non-zero hwirq base
> ARM: gic: add irq_domain support
> ARM: gic: add OF based initialization
For Exynos4 GIC and Interrupt Combiner Controllers:
Tested-by: Thomas Abraham <thomas.abraham@linaro.org>
>
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/gic.txt | 55 ++++++++++
> arch/arm/common/Kconfig | 1 +
> arch/arm/common/gic.c | 142 +++++++++++++++++++------
> arch/arm/include/asm/hardware/gic.h | 5 +-
> include/linux/irqdomain.h | 16 +++-
> kernel/irq/irqdomain.c | 12 +-
> 6 files changed, 189 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/gic.txt
>
> --
> 1.7.5.4
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 53+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 0/3] GIC OF bindings
@ 2011-10-08 14:04 ` Thomas Abraham
0 siblings, 0 replies; 53+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Abraham @ 2011-10-08 14:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On 1 October 2011 00:57, Rob Herring <robherring2@gmail.com> wrote:
> From: Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>
>
> Another round of GIC devicetree support.
>
> This moves the tracking of the starting hwirq number into the irq domain
> code. Doing this makes hwirq == GIC interrupt ID and simplifies the GIC
> code removing irq_offset.
>
> The full series is available here. This includes Russell's devel-stable and
> for-next branches and Nico's vmalloc branch:
>
> git://git.jdl.com/software/linux-3.0.git gic-v2
>
> Tested on highbank and Realview 11MPCore qemu (2 GICs).
>
> Rob
>
> Rob Herring (3):
> ?irq: support domains with non-zero hwirq base
> ?ARM: gic: add irq_domain support
> ?ARM: gic: add OF based initialization
For Exynos4 GIC and Interrupt Combiner Controllers:
Tested-by: Thomas Abraham <thomas.abraham@linaro.org>
>
> ?Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/gic.txt | ? 55 ++++++++++
> ?arch/arm/common/Kconfig ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? | ? ?1 +
> ?arch/arm/common/gic.c ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? | ?142 +++++++++++++++++++------
> ?arch/arm/include/asm/hardware/gic.h ? ? ? ? ? | ? ?5 +-
> ?include/linux/irqdomain.h ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? | ? 16 +++-
> ?kernel/irq/irqdomain.c ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?| ? 12 +-
> ?6 files changed, 189 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)
> ?create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/gic.txt
>
> --
> 1.7.5.4
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 53+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] irq: support domains with non-zero hwirq base
2011-10-05 2:56 ` Rob Herring
@ 2011-10-11 13:18 ` Rob Herring
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 53+ messages in thread
From: Rob Herring @ 2011-10-11 13:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thomas Gleixner; +Cc: grant.likely, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel
Thomas,
On 10/04/2011 09:56 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
> From: Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>
>
> Interrupt controllers can have non-zero starting value for h/w irq numbers.
> Adding support in irq_domain allows the domain hwirq numbering to match
> the interrupt controllers' numbering.
>
> As this makes looping over irqs for a domain more complicated, add loop
> iterators to iterate over all hwirqs and irqs for a domain.
>
> Acked-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>
> ---
> Thomas,
>
> Please ack. I'm dependent on this for adding Calxeda highbank support, so
> I'd like to take this thru arm-soc tree.
>
Can you please comment?
Rob
> v2:
> - Rebase to tglx's changes in my previous irq domain commit:
> irq: Fix check for already initialized irq_domain in irq_domain_add
> - drop NO_IRQ and add WARN_ON in irq_domain_to_irq
>
> Rob
>
> include/linux/irqdomain.h | 16 +++++++++++++++-
> kernel/irq/irqdomain.c | 12 ++++++------
> 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/irqdomain.h b/include/linux/irqdomain.h
> index 3ad553e..99834e58 100644
> --- a/include/linux/irqdomain.h
> +++ b/include/linux/irqdomain.h
> @@ -47,6 +47,7 @@ struct irq_domain_ops {
> * of the irq_domain is responsible for allocating the array of
> * irq_desc structures.
> * @nr_irq: Number of irqs managed by the irq domain
> + * @hwirq_base: Starting number for hwirqs managed by the irq domain
> * @ops: pointer to irq_domain methods
> * @priv: private data pointer for use by owner. Not touched by irq_domain
> * core code.
> @@ -57,6 +58,7 @@ struct irq_domain {
> struct list_head list;
> unsigned int irq_base;
> unsigned int nr_irq;
> + unsigned int hwirq_base;
> const struct irq_domain_ops *ops;
> void *priv;
> struct device_node *of_node;
> @@ -72,9 +74,21 @@ struct irq_domain {
> static inline unsigned int irq_domain_to_irq(struct irq_domain *d,
> unsigned long hwirq)
> {
> - return d->ops->to_irq ? d->ops->to_irq(d, hwirq) : d->irq_base + hwirq;
> + if (d->ops->to_irq)
> + return d->ops->to_irq(d, hwirq);
> + if (WARN_ON(hwirq < d->hwirq_base))
> + return 0;
> + return d->irq_base + hwirq - d->hwirq_base;
> }
>
> +#define irq_domain_for_each_hwirq(d, hw) \
> + for (hw = d->hwirq_base; hw < d->hwirq_base + d->nr_irq; hw++)
> +
> +#define irq_domain_for_each_irq(d, hw, irq) \
> + for (hw = d->hwirq_base, irq = irq_domain_to_irq(d, hw); \
> + hw < d->hwirq_base + d->nr_irq; \
> + hw++, irq = irq_domain_to_irq(d, hw))
> +
> extern void irq_domain_add(struct irq_domain *domain);
> extern void irq_domain_del(struct irq_domain *domain);
> #endif /* CONFIG_IRQ_DOMAIN */
> diff --git a/kernel/irq/irqdomain.c b/kernel/irq/irqdomain.c
> index b57a377..200ce83 100644
> --- a/kernel/irq/irqdomain.c
> +++ b/kernel/irq/irqdomain.c
> @@ -20,15 +20,15 @@ static DEFINE_MUTEX(irq_domain_mutex);
> void irq_domain_add(struct irq_domain *domain)
> {
> struct irq_data *d;
> - int hwirq;
> + int hwirq, irq;
>
> /*
> * This assumes that the irq_domain owner has already allocated
> * the irq_descs. This block will be removed when support for dynamic
> * allocation of irq_descs is added to irq_domain.
> */
> - for (hwirq = 0; hwirq < domain->nr_irq; hwirq++) {
> - d = irq_get_irq_data(irq_domain_to_irq(domain, hwirq));
> + irq_domain_for_each_irq(domain, hwirq, irq) {
> + d = irq_get_irq_data(irq);
> if (!d) {
> WARN(1, "error: assigning domain to non existant irq_desc");
> return;
> @@ -54,15 +54,15 @@ void irq_domain_add(struct irq_domain *domain)
> void irq_domain_del(struct irq_domain *domain)
> {
> struct irq_data *d;
> - int hwirq;
> + int hwirq, irq;
>
> mutex_lock(&irq_domain_mutex);
> list_del(&domain->list);
> mutex_unlock(&irq_domain_mutex);
>
> /* Clear the irq_domain assignments */
> - for (hwirq = 0; hwirq < domain->nr_irq; hwirq++) {
> - d = irq_get_irq_data(irq_domain_to_irq(domain, hwirq));
> + irq_domain_for_each_irq(domain, hwirq, irq) {
> + d = irq_get_irq_data(irq);
> d->domain = NULL;
> }
> }
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 53+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2] irq: support domains with non-zero hwirq base
@ 2011-10-11 13:18 ` Rob Herring
0 siblings, 0 replies; 53+ messages in thread
From: Rob Herring @ 2011-10-11 13:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
Thomas,
On 10/04/2011 09:56 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
> From: Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>
>
> Interrupt controllers can have non-zero starting value for h/w irq numbers.
> Adding support in irq_domain allows the domain hwirq numbering to match
> the interrupt controllers' numbering.
>
> As this makes looping over irqs for a domain more complicated, add loop
> iterators to iterate over all hwirqs and irqs for a domain.
>
> Acked-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>
> ---
> Thomas,
>
> Please ack. I'm dependent on this for adding Calxeda highbank support, so
> I'd like to take this thru arm-soc tree.
>
Can you please comment?
Rob
> v2:
> - Rebase to tglx's changes in my previous irq domain commit:
> irq: Fix check for already initialized irq_domain in irq_domain_add
> - drop NO_IRQ and add WARN_ON in irq_domain_to_irq
>
> Rob
>
> include/linux/irqdomain.h | 16 +++++++++++++++-
> kernel/irq/irqdomain.c | 12 ++++++------
> 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/irqdomain.h b/include/linux/irqdomain.h
> index 3ad553e..99834e58 100644
> --- a/include/linux/irqdomain.h
> +++ b/include/linux/irqdomain.h
> @@ -47,6 +47,7 @@ struct irq_domain_ops {
> * of the irq_domain is responsible for allocating the array of
> * irq_desc structures.
> * @nr_irq: Number of irqs managed by the irq domain
> + * @hwirq_base: Starting number for hwirqs managed by the irq domain
> * @ops: pointer to irq_domain methods
> * @priv: private data pointer for use by owner. Not touched by irq_domain
> * core code.
> @@ -57,6 +58,7 @@ struct irq_domain {
> struct list_head list;
> unsigned int irq_base;
> unsigned int nr_irq;
> + unsigned int hwirq_base;
> const struct irq_domain_ops *ops;
> void *priv;
> struct device_node *of_node;
> @@ -72,9 +74,21 @@ struct irq_domain {
> static inline unsigned int irq_domain_to_irq(struct irq_domain *d,
> unsigned long hwirq)
> {
> - return d->ops->to_irq ? d->ops->to_irq(d, hwirq) : d->irq_base + hwirq;
> + if (d->ops->to_irq)
> + return d->ops->to_irq(d, hwirq);
> + if (WARN_ON(hwirq < d->hwirq_base))
> + return 0;
> + return d->irq_base + hwirq - d->hwirq_base;
> }
>
> +#define irq_domain_for_each_hwirq(d, hw) \
> + for (hw = d->hwirq_base; hw < d->hwirq_base + d->nr_irq; hw++)
> +
> +#define irq_domain_for_each_irq(d, hw, irq) \
> + for (hw = d->hwirq_base, irq = irq_domain_to_irq(d, hw); \
> + hw < d->hwirq_base + d->nr_irq; \
> + hw++, irq = irq_domain_to_irq(d, hw))
> +
> extern void irq_domain_add(struct irq_domain *domain);
> extern void irq_domain_del(struct irq_domain *domain);
> #endif /* CONFIG_IRQ_DOMAIN */
> diff --git a/kernel/irq/irqdomain.c b/kernel/irq/irqdomain.c
> index b57a377..200ce83 100644
> --- a/kernel/irq/irqdomain.c
> +++ b/kernel/irq/irqdomain.c
> @@ -20,15 +20,15 @@ static DEFINE_MUTEX(irq_domain_mutex);
> void irq_domain_add(struct irq_domain *domain)
> {
> struct irq_data *d;
> - int hwirq;
> + int hwirq, irq;
>
> /*
> * This assumes that the irq_domain owner has already allocated
> * the irq_descs. This block will be removed when support for dynamic
> * allocation of irq_descs is added to irq_domain.
> */
> - for (hwirq = 0; hwirq < domain->nr_irq; hwirq++) {
> - d = irq_get_irq_data(irq_domain_to_irq(domain, hwirq));
> + irq_domain_for_each_irq(domain, hwirq, irq) {
> + d = irq_get_irq_data(irq);
> if (!d) {
> WARN(1, "error: assigning domain to non existant irq_desc");
> return;
> @@ -54,15 +54,15 @@ void irq_domain_add(struct irq_domain *domain)
> void irq_domain_del(struct irq_domain *domain)
> {
> struct irq_data *d;
> - int hwirq;
> + int hwirq, irq;
>
> mutex_lock(&irq_domain_mutex);
> list_del(&domain->list);
> mutex_unlock(&irq_domain_mutex);
>
> /* Clear the irq_domain assignments */
> - for (hwirq = 0; hwirq < domain->nr_irq; hwirq++) {
> - d = irq_get_irq_data(irq_domain_to_irq(domain, hwirq));
> + irq_domain_for_each_irq(domain, hwirq, irq) {
> + d = irq_get_irq_data(irq);
> d->domain = NULL;
> }
> }
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 53+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] irq: support domains with non-zero hwirq base
2011-10-11 13:18 ` Rob Herring
@ 2011-10-13 19:33 ` Grant Likely
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 53+ messages in thread
From: Grant Likely @ 2011-10-13 19:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rob Herring, Thomas Gleixner; +Cc: linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel
Thomas, any objection to this patch? It's entirely contained within
the irq_domain stuff, so it is pretty well isolated.
It can be merged via arm-soc since it is depended on by some of the
irq work.
g.
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 08:18:58AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> Thomas,
>
> On 10/04/2011 09:56 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
> > From: Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>
> >
> > Interrupt controllers can have non-zero starting value for h/w irq numbers.
> > Adding support in irq_domain allows the domain hwirq numbering to match
> > the interrupt controllers' numbering.
> >
> > As this makes looping over irqs for a domain more complicated, add loop
> > iterators to iterate over all hwirqs and irqs for a domain.
> >
> > Acked-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
> > Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> > Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>
> > ---
> > Thomas,
> >
> > Please ack. I'm dependent on this for adding Calxeda highbank support, so
> > I'd like to take this thru arm-soc tree.
> >
>
> Can you please comment?
>
> Rob
>
> > v2:
> > - Rebase to tglx's changes in my previous irq domain commit:
> > irq: Fix check for already initialized irq_domain in irq_domain_add
> > - drop NO_IRQ and add WARN_ON in irq_domain_to_irq
> >
> > Rob
> >
> > include/linux/irqdomain.h | 16 +++++++++++++++-
> > kernel/irq/irqdomain.c | 12 ++++++------
> > 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/irqdomain.h b/include/linux/irqdomain.h
> > index 3ad553e..99834e58 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/irqdomain.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/irqdomain.h
> > @@ -47,6 +47,7 @@ struct irq_domain_ops {
> > * of the irq_domain is responsible for allocating the array of
> > * irq_desc structures.
> > * @nr_irq: Number of irqs managed by the irq domain
> > + * @hwirq_base: Starting number for hwirqs managed by the irq domain
> > * @ops: pointer to irq_domain methods
> > * @priv: private data pointer for use by owner. Not touched by irq_domain
> > * core code.
> > @@ -57,6 +58,7 @@ struct irq_domain {
> > struct list_head list;
> > unsigned int irq_base;
> > unsigned int nr_irq;
> > + unsigned int hwirq_base;
> > const struct irq_domain_ops *ops;
> > void *priv;
> > struct device_node *of_node;
> > @@ -72,9 +74,21 @@ struct irq_domain {
> > static inline unsigned int irq_domain_to_irq(struct irq_domain *d,
> > unsigned long hwirq)
> > {
> > - return d->ops->to_irq ? d->ops->to_irq(d, hwirq) : d->irq_base + hwirq;
> > + if (d->ops->to_irq)
> > + return d->ops->to_irq(d, hwirq);
> > + if (WARN_ON(hwirq < d->hwirq_base))
> > + return 0;
> > + return d->irq_base + hwirq - d->hwirq_base;
> > }
> >
> > +#define irq_domain_for_each_hwirq(d, hw) \
> > + for (hw = d->hwirq_base; hw < d->hwirq_base + d->nr_irq; hw++)
> > +
> > +#define irq_domain_for_each_irq(d, hw, irq) \
> > + for (hw = d->hwirq_base, irq = irq_domain_to_irq(d, hw); \
> > + hw < d->hwirq_base + d->nr_irq; \
> > + hw++, irq = irq_domain_to_irq(d, hw))
> > +
> > extern void irq_domain_add(struct irq_domain *domain);
> > extern void irq_domain_del(struct irq_domain *domain);
> > #endif /* CONFIG_IRQ_DOMAIN */
> > diff --git a/kernel/irq/irqdomain.c b/kernel/irq/irqdomain.c
> > index b57a377..200ce83 100644
> > --- a/kernel/irq/irqdomain.c
> > +++ b/kernel/irq/irqdomain.c
> > @@ -20,15 +20,15 @@ static DEFINE_MUTEX(irq_domain_mutex);
> > void irq_domain_add(struct irq_domain *domain)
> > {
> > struct irq_data *d;
> > - int hwirq;
> > + int hwirq, irq;
> >
> > /*
> > * This assumes that the irq_domain owner has already allocated
> > * the irq_descs. This block will be removed when support for dynamic
> > * allocation of irq_descs is added to irq_domain.
> > */
> > - for (hwirq = 0; hwirq < domain->nr_irq; hwirq++) {
> > - d = irq_get_irq_data(irq_domain_to_irq(domain, hwirq));
> > + irq_domain_for_each_irq(domain, hwirq, irq) {
> > + d = irq_get_irq_data(irq);
> > if (!d) {
> > WARN(1, "error: assigning domain to non existant irq_desc");
> > return;
> > @@ -54,15 +54,15 @@ void irq_domain_add(struct irq_domain *domain)
> > void irq_domain_del(struct irq_domain *domain)
> > {
> > struct irq_data *d;
> > - int hwirq;
> > + int hwirq, irq;
> >
> > mutex_lock(&irq_domain_mutex);
> > list_del(&domain->list);
> > mutex_unlock(&irq_domain_mutex);
> >
> > /* Clear the irq_domain assignments */
> > - for (hwirq = 0; hwirq < domain->nr_irq; hwirq++) {
> > - d = irq_get_irq_data(irq_domain_to_irq(domain, hwirq));
> > + irq_domain_for_each_irq(domain, hwirq, irq) {
> > + d = irq_get_irq_data(irq);
> > d->domain = NULL;
> > }
> > }
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 53+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2] irq: support domains with non-zero hwirq base
@ 2011-10-13 19:33 ` Grant Likely
0 siblings, 0 replies; 53+ messages in thread
From: Grant Likely @ 2011-10-13 19:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
Thomas, any objection to this patch? It's entirely contained within
the irq_domain stuff, so it is pretty well isolated.
It can be merged via arm-soc since it is depended on by some of the
irq work.
g.
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 08:18:58AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> Thomas,
>
> On 10/04/2011 09:56 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
> > From: Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>
> >
> > Interrupt controllers can have non-zero starting value for h/w irq numbers.
> > Adding support in irq_domain allows the domain hwirq numbering to match
> > the interrupt controllers' numbering.
> >
> > As this makes looping over irqs for a domain more complicated, add loop
> > iterators to iterate over all hwirqs and irqs for a domain.
> >
> > Acked-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
> > Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> > Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>
> > ---
> > Thomas,
> >
> > Please ack. I'm dependent on this for adding Calxeda highbank support, so
> > I'd like to take this thru arm-soc tree.
> >
>
> Can you please comment?
>
> Rob
>
> > v2:
> > - Rebase to tglx's changes in my previous irq domain commit:
> > irq: Fix check for already initialized irq_domain in irq_domain_add
> > - drop NO_IRQ and add WARN_ON in irq_domain_to_irq
> >
> > Rob
> >
> > include/linux/irqdomain.h | 16 +++++++++++++++-
> > kernel/irq/irqdomain.c | 12 ++++++------
> > 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/irqdomain.h b/include/linux/irqdomain.h
> > index 3ad553e..99834e58 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/irqdomain.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/irqdomain.h
> > @@ -47,6 +47,7 @@ struct irq_domain_ops {
> > * of the irq_domain is responsible for allocating the array of
> > * irq_desc structures.
> > * @nr_irq: Number of irqs managed by the irq domain
> > + * @hwirq_base: Starting number for hwirqs managed by the irq domain
> > * @ops: pointer to irq_domain methods
> > * @priv: private data pointer for use by owner. Not touched by irq_domain
> > * core code.
> > @@ -57,6 +58,7 @@ struct irq_domain {
> > struct list_head list;
> > unsigned int irq_base;
> > unsigned int nr_irq;
> > + unsigned int hwirq_base;
> > const struct irq_domain_ops *ops;
> > void *priv;
> > struct device_node *of_node;
> > @@ -72,9 +74,21 @@ struct irq_domain {
> > static inline unsigned int irq_domain_to_irq(struct irq_domain *d,
> > unsigned long hwirq)
> > {
> > - return d->ops->to_irq ? d->ops->to_irq(d, hwirq) : d->irq_base + hwirq;
> > + if (d->ops->to_irq)
> > + return d->ops->to_irq(d, hwirq);
> > + if (WARN_ON(hwirq < d->hwirq_base))
> > + return 0;
> > + return d->irq_base + hwirq - d->hwirq_base;
> > }
> >
> > +#define irq_domain_for_each_hwirq(d, hw) \
> > + for (hw = d->hwirq_base; hw < d->hwirq_base + d->nr_irq; hw++)
> > +
> > +#define irq_domain_for_each_irq(d, hw, irq) \
> > + for (hw = d->hwirq_base, irq = irq_domain_to_irq(d, hw); \
> > + hw < d->hwirq_base + d->nr_irq; \
> > + hw++, irq = irq_domain_to_irq(d, hw))
> > +
> > extern void irq_domain_add(struct irq_domain *domain);
> > extern void irq_domain_del(struct irq_domain *domain);
> > #endif /* CONFIG_IRQ_DOMAIN */
> > diff --git a/kernel/irq/irqdomain.c b/kernel/irq/irqdomain.c
> > index b57a377..200ce83 100644
> > --- a/kernel/irq/irqdomain.c
> > +++ b/kernel/irq/irqdomain.c
> > @@ -20,15 +20,15 @@ static DEFINE_MUTEX(irq_domain_mutex);
> > void irq_domain_add(struct irq_domain *domain)
> > {
> > struct irq_data *d;
> > - int hwirq;
> > + int hwirq, irq;
> >
> > /*
> > * This assumes that the irq_domain owner has already allocated
> > * the irq_descs. This block will be removed when support for dynamic
> > * allocation of irq_descs is added to irq_domain.
> > */
> > - for (hwirq = 0; hwirq < domain->nr_irq; hwirq++) {
> > - d = irq_get_irq_data(irq_domain_to_irq(domain, hwirq));
> > + irq_domain_for_each_irq(domain, hwirq, irq) {
> > + d = irq_get_irq_data(irq);
> > if (!d) {
> > WARN(1, "error: assigning domain to non existant irq_desc");
> > return;
> > @@ -54,15 +54,15 @@ void irq_domain_add(struct irq_domain *domain)
> > void irq_domain_del(struct irq_domain *domain)
> > {
> > struct irq_data *d;
> > - int hwirq;
> > + int hwirq, irq;
> >
> > mutex_lock(&irq_domain_mutex);
> > list_del(&domain->list);
> > mutex_unlock(&irq_domain_mutex);
> >
> > /* Clear the irq_domain assignments */
> > - for (hwirq = 0; hwirq < domain->nr_irq; hwirq++) {
> > - d = irq_get_irq_data(irq_domain_to_irq(domain, hwirq));
> > + irq_domain_for_each_irq(domain, hwirq, irq) {
> > + d = irq_get_irq_data(irq);
> > d->domain = NULL;
> > }
> > }
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 53+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] irq: support domains with non-zero hwirq base
2011-10-13 19:33 ` Grant Likely
@ 2011-10-13 20:12 ` Thomas Gleixner
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 53+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Gleixner @ 2011-10-13 20:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Grant Likely; +Cc: Rob Herring, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel
On Thu, 13 Oct 2011, Grant Likely wrote:
> Thomas, any objection to this patch? It's entirely contained within
> the irq_domain stuff, so it is pretty well isolated.
>
> It can be merged via arm-soc since it is depended on by some of the
> irq work.
Acked-by-me
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 53+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2] irq: support domains with non-zero hwirq base
@ 2011-10-13 20:12 ` Thomas Gleixner
0 siblings, 0 replies; 53+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Gleixner @ 2011-10-13 20:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On Thu, 13 Oct 2011, Grant Likely wrote:
> Thomas, any objection to this patch? It's entirely contained within
> the irq_domain stuff, so it is pretty well isolated.
>
> It can be merged via arm-soc since it is depended on by some of the
> irq work.
Acked-by-me
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 53+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 0/3] GIC OF bindings
@ 2011-09-21 9:43 ` Shawn Guo
0 siblings, 0 replies; 53+ messages in thread
From: Shawn Guo @ 2011-09-21 9:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rob Herring
Cc: linux-arm-kernel, devicetree-discuss, linux-kernel, dave.martin,
linux, b-cousson, marc.zyngier, Rob Herring, grant.likely,
thomas.abraham, jamie, shawn.guo
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 03:24:01PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> From: Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>
>
> Hopefully, this is the final or near final version of GIC binding support.
>
> Changes from the previous version:
> - SPIs and PPIs are numbered starting at 0. Now the gic has it's own irq
> domain translate function instead of the simple domain one.
> - interrupt cell format has changed based on Grant's proposal.
> - Dropped "ARM: gic: allow irq_start to be 0". Instead, the first 16 irqs
> are skipped and the domain irq_base adjusted accordingly.
> - Added a fix to of_irq_find_parent when the parent == child.
> - Renamed intc_desc.parent to intc_desc.interrupt_parent.
> - Implemented Grant's algorithm for walking the list of interrupt
> controllers. Added a return value to interrupt init functions, so they
> don't get added to the parent list on a init failure.
>
> The changes are significant enough that I did not include previous
> acked/reviewed/tested-by's.
>
You can add mine back. On imx6q:
Tested-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
Hopefully, this is the last round of binding scheme change. There are
63 nodes in imx6q dts with 'interrupts' property. I have changed them
3 times :)
--
Regards,
Shawn
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 53+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 0/3] GIC OF bindings
@ 2011-09-21 9:43 ` Shawn Guo
0 siblings, 0 replies; 53+ messages in thread
From: Shawn Guo @ 2011-09-21 9:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rob Herring
Cc: dave.martin-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A, linux-lFZ/pmaqli7XmaaqVzeoHQ,
devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, Rob Herring,
linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 03:24:01PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> From: Rob Herring <rob.herring-bsGFqQB8/DxBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
>
> Hopefully, this is the final or near final version of GIC binding support.
>
> Changes from the previous version:
> - SPIs and PPIs are numbered starting at 0. Now the gic has it's own irq
> domain translate function instead of the simple domain one.
> - interrupt cell format has changed based on Grant's proposal.
> - Dropped "ARM: gic: allow irq_start to be 0". Instead, the first 16 irqs
> are skipped and the domain irq_base adjusted accordingly.
> - Added a fix to of_irq_find_parent when the parent == child.
> - Renamed intc_desc.parent to intc_desc.interrupt_parent.
> - Implemented Grant's algorithm for walking the list of interrupt
> controllers. Added a return value to interrupt init functions, so they
> don't get added to the parent list on a init failure.
>
> The changes are significant enough that I did not include previous
> acked/reviewed/tested-by's.
>
You can add mine back. On imx6q:
Tested-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Hopefully, this is the last round of binding scheme change. There are
63 nodes in imx6q dts with 'interrupts' property. I have changed them
3 times :)
--
Regards,
Shawn
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 53+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 0/3] GIC OF bindings
@ 2011-09-21 9:43 ` Shawn Guo
0 siblings, 0 replies; 53+ messages in thread
From: Shawn Guo @ 2011-09-21 9:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 03:24:01PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> From: Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>
>
> Hopefully, this is the final or near final version of GIC binding support.
>
> Changes from the previous version:
> - SPIs and PPIs are numbered starting at 0. Now the gic has it's own irq
> domain translate function instead of the simple domain one.
> - interrupt cell format has changed based on Grant's proposal.
> - Dropped "ARM: gic: allow irq_start to be 0". Instead, the first 16 irqs
> are skipped and the domain irq_base adjusted accordingly.
> - Added a fix to of_irq_find_parent when the parent == child.
> - Renamed intc_desc.parent to intc_desc.interrupt_parent.
> - Implemented Grant's algorithm for walking the list of interrupt
> controllers. Added a return value to interrupt init functions, so they
> don't get added to the parent list on a init failure.
>
> The changes are significant enough that I did not include previous
> acked/reviewed/tested-by's.
>
You can add mine back. On imx6q:
Tested-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
Hopefully, this is the last round of binding scheme change. There are
63 nodes in imx6q dts with 'interrupts' property. I have changed them
3 times :)
--
Regards,
Shawn
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 53+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 0/3] GIC OF bindings
@ 2011-09-21 7:11 ` Mitch Bradley
0 siblings, 0 replies; 53+ messages in thread
From: Mitch Bradley @ 2011-09-21 7:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Miller
Cc: grant.likely, dave.martin, linux, devicetree-discuss,
linux-kernel, rob.herring, linux-arm-kernel
On 9/20/2011 7:21 PM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Mitch Bradley<wmb@firmworks.com>
> Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2011 18:58:12 -1000
>
>> interrupt-parent has been part of the interrupt mapping spec from the
>> inception of same.
>>
>> http://www.openfirmware.info/docs/rec.intmap.d09.pdf
>
> Thanks for the link.
>
> In my vast collection of Sun OF dumps, I cannot find a single instance
> where they've made use of this property, which is why I've never seen
> it before.
I can't say I'm surprised at that. Sun hardware tends to be rather more
hierarchical than is the norm in, for example, the PC space. This
particular document came into being during the CHRP era, when IBM and
Apple were trying to glue a Macintosh legacy I/O system onto the side of
a PC legacy I/O system. The result was not pretty.
Sun had at least the semblance of a coherent architectural design and
review process.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 53+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 0/3] GIC OF bindings
@ 2011-09-21 7:11 ` Mitch Bradley
0 siblings, 0 replies; 53+ messages in thread
From: Mitch Bradley @ 2011-09-21 7:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Miller
Cc: dave.martin-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A, linux-lFZ/pmaqli7XmaaqVzeoHQ,
devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA,
rob.herring-bsGFqQB8/DxBDgjK7y7TUQ,
linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r
On 9/20/2011 7:21 PM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Mitch Bradley<wmb-D5eQfiDGL7eakBO8gow8eQ@public.gmane.org>
> Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2011 18:58:12 -1000
>
>> interrupt-parent has been part of the interrupt mapping spec from the
>> inception of same.
>>
>> http://www.openfirmware.info/docs/rec.intmap.d09.pdf
>
> Thanks for the link.
>
> In my vast collection of Sun OF dumps, I cannot find a single instance
> where they've made use of this property, which is why I've never seen
> it before.
I can't say I'm surprised at that. Sun hardware tends to be rather more
hierarchical than is the norm in, for example, the PC space. This
particular document came into being during the CHRP era, when IBM and
Apple were trying to glue a Macintosh legacy I/O system onto the side of
a PC legacy I/O system. The result was not pretty.
Sun had at least the semblance of a coherent architectural design and
review process.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 53+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 0/3] GIC OF bindings
@ 2011-09-21 7:11 ` Mitch Bradley
0 siblings, 0 replies; 53+ messages in thread
From: Mitch Bradley @ 2011-09-21 7:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On 9/20/2011 7:21 PM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Mitch Bradley<wmb@firmworks.com>
> Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2011 18:58:12 -1000
>
>> interrupt-parent has been part of the interrupt mapping spec from the
>> inception of same.
>>
>> http://www.openfirmware.info/docs/rec.intmap.d09.pdf
>
> Thanks for the link.
>
> In my vast collection of Sun OF dumps, I cannot find a single instance
> where they've made use of this property, which is why I've never seen
> it before.
I can't say I'm surprised at that. Sun hardware tends to be rather more
hierarchical than is the norm in, for example, the PC space. This
particular document came into being during the CHRP era, when IBM and
Apple were trying to glue a Macintosh legacy I/O system onto the side of
a PC legacy I/O system. The result was not pretty.
Sun had at least the semblance of a coherent architectural design and
review process.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 53+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 0/3] GIC OF bindings
2011-09-21 4:58 ` Mitch Bradley
(?)
@ 2011-09-21 5:21 ` David Miller
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 53+ messages in thread
From: David Miller @ 2011-09-21 5:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: wmb
Cc: grant.likely, dave.martin, linux, devicetree-discuss,
linux-kernel, rob.herring, linux-arm-kernel
From: Mitch Bradley <wmb@firmworks.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2011 18:58:12 -1000
> interrupt-parent has been part of the interrupt mapping spec from the
> inception of same.
>
> http://www.openfirmware.info/docs/rec.intmap.d09.pdf
Thanks for the link.
In my vast collection of Sun OF dumps, I cannot find a single instance
where they've made use of this property, which is why I've never seen
it before.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 53+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 0/3] GIC OF bindings
@ 2011-09-21 5:21 ` David Miller
0 siblings, 0 replies; 53+ messages in thread
From: David Miller @ 2011-09-21 5:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: wmb
Cc: dave.martin, linux, devicetree-discuss, linux-kernel,
rob.herring, grant.likely, linux-arm-kernel
From: Mitch Bradley <wmb@firmworks.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2011 18:58:12 -1000
> interrupt-parent has been part of the interrupt mapping spec from the
> inception of same.
>
> http://www.openfirmware.info/docs/rec.intmap.d09.pdf
Thanks for the link.
In my vast collection of Sun OF dumps, I cannot find a single instance
where they've made use of this property, which is why I've never seen
it before.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 53+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 0/3] GIC OF bindings
@ 2011-09-21 5:21 ` David Miller
0 siblings, 0 replies; 53+ messages in thread
From: David Miller @ 2011-09-21 5:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
From: Mitch Bradley <wmb@firmworks.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2011 18:58:12 -1000
> interrupt-parent has been part of the interrupt mapping spec from the
> inception of same.
>
> http://www.openfirmware.info/docs/rec.intmap.d09.pdf
Thanks for the link.
In my vast collection of Sun OF dumps, I cannot find a single instance
where they've made use of this property, which is why I've never seen
it before.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 53+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 0/3] GIC OF bindings
@ 2011-09-21 5:16 ` Segher Boessenkool
0 siblings, 0 replies; 53+ messages in thread
From: Segher Boessenkool @ 2011-09-21 5:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Miller
Cc: robherring2, dave.martin, linux, devicetree-discuss,
linux-kernel, rob.herring, linux-arm-kernel
> Just out of curiosity where does this "interrupt-parent" property
> come from?
>
> On platforms I am familiar with, the parent path is walked to the root
> and we stop at device nodes that have "interrupt-map" and
> "interrupt-map-mask" properties.
"interrupt-parent" is defined in the Open Firmware "interrupt mapping"
recommended practice, the same place as "interrupt-map" etc. are.
> The mechanism shown here seems overly simplistic and not able to
> handle
> the cases handled by existing OF property schemes in use for several
> years on real systems.
"interrupt-parent" is only meant to be used for the simple cases. It's
quite handy there. It is also required in all "interrupt-controller"
nodes that aren't the root of the interrupt tree.
Segher
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 53+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 0/3] GIC OF bindings
@ 2011-09-21 5:16 ` Segher Boessenkool
0 siblings, 0 replies; 53+ messages in thread
From: Segher Boessenkool @ 2011-09-21 5:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Miller
Cc: dave.martin-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A, linux-lFZ/pmaqli7XmaaqVzeoHQ,
devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA,
rob.herring-bsGFqQB8/DxBDgjK7y7TUQ,
linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r
> Just out of curiosity where does this "interrupt-parent" property
> come from?
>
> On platforms I am familiar with, the parent path is walked to the root
> and we stop at device nodes that have "interrupt-map" and
> "interrupt-map-mask" properties.
"interrupt-parent" is defined in the Open Firmware "interrupt mapping"
recommended practice, the same place as "interrupt-map" etc. are.
> The mechanism shown here seems overly simplistic and not able to
> handle
> the cases handled by existing OF property schemes in use for several
> years on real systems.
"interrupt-parent" is only meant to be used for the simple cases. It's
quite handy there. It is also required in all "interrupt-controller"
nodes that aren't the root of the interrupt tree.
Segher
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 53+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 0/3] GIC OF bindings
@ 2011-09-21 5:16 ` Segher Boessenkool
0 siblings, 0 replies; 53+ messages in thread
From: Segher Boessenkool @ 2011-09-21 5:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
> Just out of curiosity where does this "interrupt-parent" property
> come from?
>
> On platforms I am familiar with, the parent path is walked to the root
> and we stop at device nodes that have "interrupt-map" and
> "interrupt-map-mask" properties.
"interrupt-parent" is defined in the Open Firmware "interrupt mapping"
recommended practice, the same place as "interrupt-map" etc. are.
> The mechanism shown here seems overly simplistic and not able to
> handle
> the cases handled by existing OF property schemes in use for several
> years on real systems.
"interrupt-parent" is only meant to be used for the simple cases. It's
quite handy there. It is also required in all "interrupt-controller"
nodes that aren't the root of the interrupt tree.
Segher
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 53+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 0/3] GIC OF bindings
@ 2011-09-21 4:58 ` Mitch Bradley
0 siblings, 0 replies; 53+ messages in thread
From: Mitch Bradley @ 2011-09-21 4:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Grant Likely
Cc: David Miller, dave.martin, linux, devicetree-discuss,
linux-kernel, rob.herring, linux-arm-kernel
On 9/20/2011 6:14 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 8:49 PM, David Miller<davem@davemloft.net> wrote:
>> From: Rob Herring<robherring2@gmail.com>
>> Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2011 15:24:01 -0500
>>
>>> Hopefully, this is the final or near final version of GIC binding support.
>>>
>>> Changes from the previous version:
>>> - SPIs and PPIs are numbered starting at 0. Now the gic has it's own irq
>>> domain translate function instead of the simple domain one.
>>> - interrupt cell format has changed based on Grant's proposal.
>>> - Dropped "ARM: gic: allow irq_start to be 0". Instead, the first 16 irqs
>>> are skipped and the domain irq_base adjusted accordingly.
>>> - Added a fix to of_irq_find_parent when the parent == child.
>>> - Renamed intc_desc.parent to intc_desc.interrupt_parent.
>>> - Implemented Grant's algorithm for walking the list of interrupt
>>> controllers. Added a return value to interrupt init functions, so they
>>> don't get added to the parent list on a init failure.
>>>
>>> The changes are significant enough that I did not include previous
>>> acked/reviewed/tested-by's.
>>
>> Just out of curiosity where does this "interrupt-parent" property
>> come from?
>>
>> On platforms I am familiar with, the parent path is walked to the root
>> and we stop at device nodes that have "interrupt-map" and
>> "interrupt-map-mask" properties.
>>
>> The map and mask are applied to the "reg" property of the device in
>> question to see which map entry matches, if a match is found the map
>> entry contains the translated interrupt.
>>
>> And this process continues over and over all the way to the root to get
>> the system interrupt that processor actually deals with.
>>
>> The mechanism shown here seems overly simplistic and not able to handle
>> the cases handled by existing OF property schemes in use for several
>> years on real systems.
>
> interrupt-parent has been implemented for years on powerpc. I don't
> know if it was ever an Open Firmware thing, but it is in ePAPR [1],
> and ARM isn't doing anything novel in that regard.
interrupt-parent has been part of the interrupt mapping spec from the
inception of same.
http://www.openfirmware.info/docs/rec.intmap.d09.pdf
>
> [1] section 2.4, page 30,
> https://www.power.org/resources/downloads/Power_ePAPR_APPROVED_v1.1.pdf
>
> It is true that is cannot handle all situations, but for those
> interrupt-map is still available.
>
> g.
> _______________________________________________
> devicetree-discuss mailing list
> devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org
> https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 53+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 0/3] GIC OF bindings
@ 2011-09-21 4:58 ` Mitch Bradley
0 siblings, 0 replies; 53+ messages in thread
From: Mitch Bradley @ 2011-09-21 4:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Grant Likely
Cc: dave.martin-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A, linux-lFZ/pmaqli7XmaaqVzeoHQ,
devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA,
rob.herring-bsGFqQB8/DxBDgjK7y7TUQ, David Miller,
linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r
On 9/20/2011 6:14 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 8:49 PM, David Miller<davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>> From: Rob Herring<robherring2-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
>> Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2011 15:24:01 -0500
>>
>>> Hopefully, this is the final or near final version of GIC binding support.
>>>
>>> Changes from the previous version:
>>> - SPIs and PPIs are numbered starting at 0. Now the gic has it's own irq
>>> domain translate function instead of the simple domain one.
>>> - interrupt cell format has changed based on Grant's proposal.
>>> - Dropped "ARM: gic: allow irq_start to be 0". Instead, the first 16 irqs
>>> are skipped and the domain irq_base adjusted accordingly.
>>> - Added a fix to of_irq_find_parent when the parent == child.
>>> - Renamed intc_desc.parent to intc_desc.interrupt_parent.
>>> - Implemented Grant's algorithm for walking the list of interrupt
>>> controllers. Added a return value to interrupt init functions, so they
>>> don't get added to the parent list on a init failure.
>>>
>>> The changes are significant enough that I did not include previous
>>> acked/reviewed/tested-by's.
>>
>> Just out of curiosity where does this "interrupt-parent" property
>> come from?
>>
>> On platforms I am familiar with, the parent path is walked to the root
>> and we stop at device nodes that have "interrupt-map" and
>> "interrupt-map-mask" properties.
>>
>> The map and mask are applied to the "reg" property of the device in
>> question to see which map entry matches, if a match is found the map
>> entry contains the translated interrupt.
>>
>> And this process continues over and over all the way to the root to get
>> the system interrupt that processor actually deals with.
>>
>> The mechanism shown here seems overly simplistic and not able to handle
>> the cases handled by existing OF property schemes in use for several
>> years on real systems.
>
> interrupt-parent has been implemented for years on powerpc. I don't
> know if it was ever an Open Firmware thing, but it is in ePAPR [1],
> and ARM isn't doing anything novel in that regard.
interrupt-parent has been part of the interrupt mapping spec from the
inception of same.
http://www.openfirmware.info/docs/rec.intmap.d09.pdf
>
> [1] section 2.4, page 30,
> https://www.power.org/resources/downloads/Power_ePAPR_APPROVED_v1.1.pdf
>
> It is true that is cannot handle all situations, but for those
> interrupt-map is still available.
>
> g.
> _______________________________________________
> devicetree-discuss mailing list
> devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org
> https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 53+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 0/3] GIC OF bindings
@ 2011-09-21 4:58 ` Mitch Bradley
0 siblings, 0 replies; 53+ messages in thread
From: Mitch Bradley @ 2011-09-21 4:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On 9/20/2011 6:14 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 8:49 PM, David Miller<davem@davemloft.net> wrote:
>> From: Rob Herring<robherring2@gmail.com>
>> Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2011 15:24:01 -0500
>>
>>> Hopefully, this is the final or near final version of GIC binding support.
>>>
>>> Changes from the previous version:
>>> - SPIs and PPIs are numbered starting at 0. Now the gic has it's own irq
>>> domain translate function instead of the simple domain one.
>>> - interrupt cell format has changed based on Grant's proposal.
>>> - Dropped "ARM: gic: allow irq_start to be 0". Instead, the first 16 irqs
>>> are skipped and the domain irq_base adjusted accordingly.
>>> - Added a fix to of_irq_find_parent when the parent == child.
>>> - Renamed intc_desc.parent to intc_desc.interrupt_parent.
>>> - Implemented Grant's algorithm for walking the list of interrupt
>>> controllers. Added a return value to interrupt init functions, so they
>>> don't get added to the parent list on a init failure.
>>>
>>> The changes are significant enough that I did not include previous
>>> acked/reviewed/tested-by's.
>>
>> Just out of curiosity where does this "interrupt-parent" property
>> come from?
>>
>> On platforms I am familiar with, the parent path is walked to the root
>> and we stop at device nodes that have "interrupt-map" and
>> "interrupt-map-mask" properties.
>>
>> The map and mask are applied to the "reg" property of the device in
>> question to see which map entry matches, if a match is found the map
>> entry contains the translated interrupt.
>>
>> And this process continues over and over all the way to the root to get
>> the system interrupt that processor actually deals with.
>>
>> The mechanism shown here seems overly simplistic and not able to handle
>> the cases handled by existing OF property schemes in use for several
>> years on real systems.
>
> interrupt-parent has been implemented for years on powerpc. I don't
> know if it was ever an Open Firmware thing, but it is in ePAPR [1],
> and ARM isn't doing anything novel in that regard.
interrupt-parent has been part of the interrupt mapping spec from the
inception of same.
http://www.openfirmware.info/docs/rec.intmap.d09.pdf
>
> [1] section 2.4, page 30,
> https://www.power.org/resources/downloads/Power_ePAPR_APPROVED_v1.1.pdf
>
> It is true that is cannot handle all situations, but for those
> interrupt-map is still available.
>
> g.
> _______________________________________________
> devicetree-discuss mailing list
> devicetree-discuss at lists.ozlabs.org
> https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 53+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 0/3] GIC OF bindings
2011-09-21 2:49 ` David Miller
@ 2011-09-21 4:14 ` Grant Likely
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 53+ messages in thread
From: Grant Likely @ 2011-09-21 4:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Miller
Cc: robherring2, dave.martin, linux, b-cousson, marc.zyngier,
devicetree-discuss, linux-kernel, rob.herring, thomas.abraham,
jamie, shawn.guo, linux-arm-kernel
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 8:49 PM, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote:
> From: Rob Herring <robherring2@gmail.com>
> Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2011 15:24:01 -0500
>
>> Hopefully, this is the final or near final version of GIC binding support.
>>
>> Changes from the previous version:
>> - SPIs and PPIs are numbered starting at 0. Now the gic has it's own irq
>> domain translate function instead of the simple domain one.
>> - interrupt cell format has changed based on Grant's proposal.
>> - Dropped "ARM: gic: allow irq_start to be 0". Instead, the first 16 irqs
>> are skipped and the domain irq_base adjusted accordingly.
>> - Added a fix to of_irq_find_parent when the parent == child.
>> - Renamed intc_desc.parent to intc_desc.interrupt_parent.
>> - Implemented Grant's algorithm for walking the list of interrupt
>> controllers. Added a return value to interrupt init functions, so they
>> don't get added to the parent list on a init failure.
>>
>> The changes are significant enough that I did not include previous
>> acked/reviewed/tested-by's.
>
> Just out of curiosity where does this "interrupt-parent" property
> come from?
>
> On platforms I am familiar with, the parent path is walked to the root
> and we stop at device nodes that have "interrupt-map" and
> "interrupt-map-mask" properties.
>
> The map and mask are applied to the "reg" property of the device in
> question to see which map entry matches, if a match is found the map
> entry contains the translated interrupt.
>
> And this process continues over and over all the way to the root to get
> the system interrupt that processor actually deals with.
>
> The mechanism shown here seems overly simplistic and not able to handle
> the cases handled by existing OF property schemes in use for several
> years on real systems.
interrupt-parent has been implemented for years on powerpc. I don't
know if it was ever an Open Firmware thing, but it is in ePAPR [1],
and ARM isn't doing anything novel in that regard.
[1] section 2.4, page 30,
https://www.power.org/resources/downloads/Power_ePAPR_APPROVED_v1.1.pdf
It is true that is cannot handle all situations, but for those
interrupt-map is still available.
g.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 53+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 0/3] GIC OF bindings
@ 2011-09-21 4:14 ` Grant Likely
0 siblings, 0 replies; 53+ messages in thread
From: Grant Likely @ 2011-09-21 4:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 8:49 PM, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote:
> From: Rob Herring <robherring2@gmail.com>
> Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2011 15:24:01 -0500
>
>> Hopefully, this is the final or near final version of GIC binding support.
>>
>> Changes from the previous version:
>> - SPIs and PPIs are numbered starting at 0. Now the gic has it's own irq
>> ? domain translate function instead of the simple domain one.
>> - interrupt cell format has changed based on Grant's proposal.
>> - Dropped "ARM: gic: allow irq_start to be 0". Instead, the first 16 irqs
>> ? are skipped and the domain irq_base adjusted accordingly.
>> - Added a fix to of_irq_find_parent when the parent == child.
>> - Renamed intc_desc.parent to intc_desc.interrupt_parent.
>> - Implemented Grant's algorithm for walking the list of interrupt
>> ? controllers. Added a return value to interrupt init functions, so they
>> ? don't get added to the parent list on a init failure.
>>
>> The changes are significant enough that I did not include previous
>> acked/reviewed/tested-by's.
>
> Just out of curiosity where does this "interrupt-parent" property
> come from?
>
> On platforms I am familiar with, the parent path is walked to the root
> and we stop at device nodes that have "interrupt-map" and
> "interrupt-map-mask" properties.
>
> The map and mask are applied to the "reg" property of the device in
> question to see which map entry matches, if a match is found the map
> entry contains the translated interrupt.
>
> And this process continues over and over all the way to the root to get
> the system interrupt that processor actually deals with.
>
> The mechanism shown here seems overly simplistic and not able to handle
> the cases handled by existing OF property schemes in use for several
> years on real systems.
interrupt-parent has been implemented for years on powerpc. I don't
know if it was ever an Open Firmware thing, but it is in ePAPR [1],
and ARM isn't doing anything novel in that regard.
[1] section 2.4, page 30,
https://www.power.org/resources/downloads/Power_ePAPR_APPROVED_v1.1.pdf
It is true that is cannot handle all situations, but for those
interrupt-map is still available.
g.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 53+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 0/3] GIC OF bindings
2011-09-20 20:24 ` Rob Herring
(?)
@ 2011-09-21 2:49 ` David Miller
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 53+ messages in thread
From: David Miller @ 2011-09-21 2:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: robherring2
Cc: linux-arm-kernel, devicetree-discuss, linux-kernel, grant.likely,
marc.zyngier, thomas.abraham, jamie, b-cousson, shawn.guo,
dave.martin, linux, rob.herring
From: Rob Herring <robherring2@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2011 15:24:01 -0500
> Hopefully, this is the final or near final version of GIC binding support.
>
> Changes from the previous version:
> - SPIs and PPIs are numbered starting at 0. Now the gic has it's own irq
> domain translate function instead of the simple domain one.
> - interrupt cell format has changed based on Grant's proposal.
> - Dropped "ARM: gic: allow irq_start to be 0". Instead, the first 16 irqs
> are skipped and the domain irq_base adjusted accordingly.
> - Added a fix to of_irq_find_parent when the parent == child.
> - Renamed intc_desc.parent to intc_desc.interrupt_parent.
> - Implemented Grant's algorithm for walking the list of interrupt
> controllers. Added a return value to interrupt init functions, so they
> don't get added to the parent list on a init failure.
>
> The changes are significant enough that I did not include previous
> acked/reviewed/tested-by's.
Just out of curiosity where does this "interrupt-parent" property
come from?
On platforms I am familiar with, the parent path is walked to the root
and we stop at device nodes that have "interrupt-map" and
"interrupt-map-mask" properties.
The map and mask are applied to the "reg" property of the device in
question to see which map entry matches, if a match is found the map
entry contains the translated interrupt.
And this process continues over and over all the way to the root to get
the system interrupt that processor actually deals with.
The mechanism shown here seems overly simplistic and not able to handle
the cases handled by existing OF property schemes in use for several
years on real systems.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 53+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 0/3] GIC OF bindings
@ 2011-09-21 2:49 ` David Miller
0 siblings, 0 replies; 53+ messages in thread
From: David Miller @ 2011-09-21 2:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: robherring2
Cc: dave.martin, linux, b-cousson, marc.zyngier, devicetree-discuss,
linux-kernel, rob.herring, grant.likely, thomas.abraham, jamie,
shawn.guo, linux-arm-kernel
From: Rob Herring <robherring2@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2011 15:24:01 -0500
> Hopefully, this is the final or near final version of GIC binding support.
>
> Changes from the previous version:
> - SPIs and PPIs are numbered starting at 0. Now the gic has it's own irq
> domain translate function instead of the simple domain one.
> - interrupt cell format has changed based on Grant's proposal.
> - Dropped "ARM: gic: allow irq_start to be 0". Instead, the first 16 irqs
> are skipped and the domain irq_base adjusted accordingly.
> - Added a fix to of_irq_find_parent when the parent == child.
> - Renamed intc_desc.parent to intc_desc.interrupt_parent.
> - Implemented Grant's algorithm for walking the list of interrupt
> controllers. Added a return value to interrupt init functions, so they
> don't get added to the parent list on a init failure.
>
> The changes are significant enough that I did not include previous
> acked/reviewed/tested-by's.
Just out of curiosity where does this "interrupt-parent" property
come from?
On platforms I am familiar with, the parent path is walked to the root
and we stop at device nodes that have "interrupt-map" and
"interrupt-map-mask" properties.
The map and mask are applied to the "reg" property of the device in
question to see which map entry matches, if a match is found the map
entry contains the translated interrupt.
And this process continues over and over all the way to the root to get
the system interrupt that processor actually deals with.
The mechanism shown here seems overly simplistic and not able to handle
the cases handled by existing OF property schemes in use for several
years on real systems.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 53+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 0/3] GIC OF bindings
@ 2011-09-21 2:49 ` David Miller
0 siblings, 0 replies; 53+ messages in thread
From: David Miller @ 2011-09-21 2:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
From: Rob Herring <robherring2@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2011 15:24:01 -0500
> Hopefully, this is the final or near final version of GIC binding support.
>
> Changes from the previous version:
> - SPIs and PPIs are numbered starting at 0. Now the gic has it's own irq
> domain translate function instead of the simple domain one.
> - interrupt cell format has changed based on Grant's proposal.
> - Dropped "ARM: gic: allow irq_start to be 0". Instead, the first 16 irqs
> are skipped and the domain irq_base adjusted accordingly.
> - Added a fix to of_irq_find_parent when the parent == child.
> - Renamed intc_desc.parent to intc_desc.interrupt_parent.
> - Implemented Grant's algorithm for walking the list of interrupt
> controllers. Added a return value to interrupt init functions, so they
> don't get added to the parent list on a init failure.
>
> The changes are significant enough that I did not include previous
> acked/reviewed/tested-by's.
Just out of curiosity where does this "interrupt-parent" property
come from?
On platforms I am familiar with, the parent path is walked to the root
and we stop at device nodes that have "interrupt-map" and
"interrupt-map-mask" properties.
The map and mask are applied to the "reg" property of the device in
question to see which map entry matches, if a match is found the map
entry contains the translated interrupt.
And this process continues over and over all the way to the root to get
the system interrupt that processor actually deals with.
The mechanism shown here seems overly simplistic and not able to handle
the cases handled by existing OF property schemes in use for several
years on real systems.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 53+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 0/3] GIC OF bindings
@ 2011-09-20 20:24 ` Rob Herring
0 siblings, 0 replies; 53+ messages in thread
From: Rob Herring @ 2011-09-20 20:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel, devicetree-discuss, linux-kernel
Cc: grant.likely, marc.zyngier, thomas.abraham, jamie, b-cousson,
shawn.guo, dave.martin, linux, Rob Herring
From: Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>
Hopefully, this is the final or near final version of GIC binding support.
Changes from the previous version:
- SPIs and PPIs are numbered starting at 0. Now the gic has it's own irq
domain translate function instead of the simple domain one.
- interrupt cell format has changed based on Grant's proposal.
- Dropped "ARM: gic: allow irq_start to be 0". Instead, the first 16 irqs
are skipped and the domain irq_base adjusted accordingly.
- Added a fix to of_irq_find_parent when the parent == child.
- Renamed intc_desc.parent to intc_desc.interrupt_parent.
- Implemented Grant's algorithm for walking the list of interrupt
controllers. Added a return value to interrupt init functions, so they
don't get added to the parent list on a init failure.
The changes are significant enough that I did not include previous
acked/reviewed/tested-by's.
Rob
Rob Herring (3):
of/irq: of_irq_find_parent: check for parent equal to child
of/irq: introduce of_irq_init
ARM: gic: add OF based initialization
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/gic.txt | 55 +++++++++++
arch/arm/common/gic.c | 89 ++++++++++++++++-
arch/arm/include/asm/hardware/gic.h | 12 +++
drivers/of/irq.c | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++--
include/linux/of_irq.h | 1 +
5 files changed, 274 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/gic.txt
--
1.7.5.4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 53+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 0/3] GIC OF bindings
@ 2011-09-20 20:24 ` Rob Herring
0 siblings, 0 replies; 53+ messages in thread
From: Rob Herring @ 2011-09-20 20:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r,
devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA
Cc: dave.martin-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A, linux-lFZ/pmaqli7XmaaqVzeoHQ,
Rob Herring
From: Rob Herring <rob.herring-bsGFqQB8/DxBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
Hopefully, this is the final or near final version of GIC binding support.
Changes from the previous version:
- SPIs and PPIs are numbered starting at 0. Now the gic has it's own irq
domain translate function instead of the simple domain one.
- interrupt cell format has changed based on Grant's proposal.
- Dropped "ARM: gic: allow irq_start to be 0". Instead, the first 16 irqs
are skipped and the domain irq_base adjusted accordingly.
- Added a fix to of_irq_find_parent when the parent == child.
- Renamed intc_desc.parent to intc_desc.interrupt_parent.
- Implemented Grant's algorithm for walking the list of interrupt
controllers. Added a return value to interrupt init functions, so they
don't get added to the parent list on a init failure.
The changes are significant enough that I did not include previous
acked/reviewed/tested-by's.
Rob
Rob Herring (3):
of/irq: of_irq_find_parent: check for parent equal to child
of/irq: introduce of_irq_init
ARM: gic: add OF based initialization
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/gic.txt | 55 +++++++++++
arch/arm/common/gic.c | 89 ++++++++++++++++-
arch/arm/include/asm/hardware/gic.h | 12 +++
drivers/of/irq.c | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++--
include/linux/of_irq.h | 1 +
5 files changed, 274 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/gic.txt
--
1.7.5.4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 53+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 0/3] GIC OF bindings
@ 2011-09-20 20:24 ` Rob Herring
0 siblings, 0 replies; 53+ messages in thread
From: Rob Herring @ 2011-09-20 20:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
From: Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>
Hopefully, this is the final or near final version of GIC binding support.
Changes from the previous version:
- SPIs and PPIs are numbered starting at 0. Now the gic has it's own irq
domain translate function instead of the simple domain one.
- interrupt cell format has changed based on Grant's proposal.
- Dropped "ARM: gic: allow irq_start to be 0". Instead, the first 16 irqs
are skipped and the domain irq_base adjusted accordingly.
- Added a fix to of_irq_find_parent when the parent == child.
- Renamed intc_desc.parent to intc_desc.interrupt_parent.
- Implemented Grant's algorithm for walking the list of interrupt
controllers. Added a return value to interrupt init functions, so they
don't get added to the parent list on a init failure.
The changes are significant enough that I did not include previous
acked/reviewed/tested-by's.
Rob
Rob Herring (3):
of/irq: of_irq_find_parent: check for parent equal to child
of/irq: introduce of_irq_init
ARM: gic: add OF based initialization
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/gic.txt | 55 +++++++++++
arch/arm/common/gic.c | 89 ++++++++++++++++-
arch/arm/include/asm/hardware/gic.h | 12 +++
drivers/of/irq.c | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++--
include/linux/of_irq.h | 1 +
5 files changed, 274 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/gic.txt
--
1.7.5.4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 53+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-10-13 20:12 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 53+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-09-30 19:27 [PATCH 0/3] GIC OF bindings Rob Herring
2011-09-30 19:27 ` Rob Herring
2011-09-30 19:27 ` [PATCH 1/3] irq: support domains with non-zero hwirq base Rob Herring
2011-09-30 19:27 ` Rob Herring
2011-09-30 19:27 ` Rob Herring
2011-10-04 23:39 ` Grant Likely
2011-10-04 23:39 ` Grant Likely
2011-10-05 2:56 ` [PATCH v2] " Rob Herring
2011-10-05 2:56 ` Rob Herring
2011-10-11 13:18 ` Rob Herring
2011-10-11 13:18 ` Rob Herring
2011-10-13 19:33 ` Grant Likely
2011-10-13 19:33 ` Grant Likely
2011-10-13 20:12 ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-10-13 20:12 ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-09-30 19:27 ` [PATCH 2/3] ARM: gic: add irq_domain support Rob Herring
2011-09-30 19:27 ` Rob Herring
2011-09-30 19:27 ` Rob Herring
2011-10-04 23:41 ` Grant Likely
2011-10-04 23:41 ` Grant Likely
2011-09-30 19:28 ` [PATCH 3/3] ARM: gic: add OF based initialization Rob Herring
2011-09-30 19:28 ` Rob Herring
2011-09-30 19:28 ` Rob Herring
2011-10-04 23:44 ` Grant Likely
2011-10-04 23:44 ` Grant Likely
2011-10-04 16:15 ` [PATCH 0/3] GIC OF bindings Rob Herring
2011-10-04 16:15 ` Rob Herring
2011-10-04 16:15 ` Rob Herring
2011-10-08 14:04 ` Thomas Abraham
2011-10-08 14:04 ` Thomas Abraham
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-09-20 20:24 Rob Herring
2011-09-20 20:24 ` Rob Herring
2011-09-20 20:24 ` Rob Herring
2011-09-21 2:49 ` David Miller
2011-09-21 2:49 ` David Miller
2011-09-21 2:49 ` David Miller
2011-09-21 4:14 ` Grant Likely
2011-09-21 4:14 ` Grant Likely
2011-09-21 4:58 ` Mitch Bradley
2011-09-21 4:58 ` Mitch Bradley
2011-09-21 4:58 ` Mitch Bradley
2011-09-21 5:21 ` David Miller
2011-09-21 5:21 ` David Miller
2011-09-21 5:21 ` David Miller
2011-09-21 7:11 ` Mitch Bradley
2011-09-21 7:11 ` Mitch Bradley
2011-09-21 7:11 ` Mitch Bradley
2011-09-21 5:16 ` Segher Boessenkool
2011-09-21 5:16 ` Segher Boessenkool
2011-09-21 5:16 ` Segher Boessenkool
2011-09-21 9:43 ` Shawn Guo
2011-09-21 9:43 ` Shawn Guo
2011-09-21 9:43 ` Shawn Guo
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.