All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] udf: stop using s_dirt
@ 2012-06-04 11:46 Artem Bityutskiy
  2012-06-04 13:44 ` Jan Kara
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Artem Bityutskiy @ 2012-06-04 11:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jan Kara; +Cc: Linux FS Maling List, Linux Kernel Maling List

From: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com>

The UDF file-system does not need the 's_dirt' superblock flag because it does
not define the 'write_super()' method. This flag was set to 1 in few places and
set to 0 in '->sync_fs()' and was basically useless. Stop using it because it
is on its way out.

Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com>
---
 fs/udf/super.c   |    6 ------
 fs/udf/udfdecl.h |    1 -
 2 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/udf/super.c b/fs/udf/super.c
index ac8a348..34e6b87 100644
--- a/fs/udf/super.c
+++ b/fs/udf/super.c
@@ -1948,7 +1948,6 @@ static int udf_fill_super(struct super_block *sb, void *options, int silent)
 	sb->s_op = &udf_sb_ops;
 	sb->s_export_op = &udf_export_ops;
 
-	sb->s_dirt = 0;
 	sb->s_magic = UDF_SUPER_MAGIC;
 	sb->s_time_gran = 1000;
 
@@ -2070,10 +2069,6 @@ void _udf_err(struct super_block *sb, const char *function,
 	struct va_format vaf;
 	va_list args;
 
-	/* mark sb error */
-	if (!(sb->s_flags & MS_RDONLY))
-		sb->s_dirt = 1;
-
 	va_start(args, fmt);
 
 	vaf.fmt = fmt;
@@ -2135,7 +2130,6 @@ static int udf_sync_fs(struct super_block *sb, int wait)
 		 * the buffer for IO
 		 */
 		mark_buffer_dirty(sbi->s_lvid_bh);
-		sb->s_dirt = 0;
 		sbi->s_lvid_dirty = 0;
 	}
 	mutex_unlock(&sbi->s_alloc_mutex);
diff --git a/fs/udf/udfdecl.h b/fs/udf/udfdecl.h
index ebe1031..de038da 100644
--- a/fs/udf/udfdecl.h
+++ b/fs/udf/udfdecl.h
@@ -129,7 +129,6 @@ static inline void udf_updated_lvid(struct super_block *sb)
 	WARN_ON_ONCE(((struct logicalVolIntegrityDesc *)
 		     bh->b_data)->integrityType !=
 		     cpu_to_le32(LVID_INTEGRITY_TYPE_OPEN));
-	sb->s_dirt = 1;
 	UDF_SB(sb)->s_lvid_dirty = 1;
 }
 extern u64 lvid_get_unique_id(struct super_block *sb);
-- 
1.7.7.6


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] udf: stop using s_dirt
  2012-06-04 11:46 [PATCH] udf: stop using s_dirt Artem Bityutskiy
@ 2012-06-04 13:44 ` Jan Kara
  2012-06-21 12:32   ` Artem Bityutskiy
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jan Kara @ 2012-06-04 13:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Artem Bityutskiy; +Cc: Jan Kara, Linux FS Maling List, Linux Kernel Maling List

On Mon 04-06-12 14:46:24, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> From: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com>
> 
> The UDF file-system does not need the 's_dirt' superblock flag because it does
> not define the 'write_super()' method. This flag was set to 1 in few places and
> set to 0 in '->sync_fs()' and was basically useless. Stop using it because it
> is on its way out.
  Thanks. I've merged the patch to my tree.

									Honza

> 
> Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>  fs/udf/super.c   |    6 ------
>  fs/udf/udfdecl.h |    1 -
>  2 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/udf/super.c b/fs/udf/super.c
> index ac8a348..34e6b87 100644
> --- a/fs/udf/super.c
> +++ b/fs/udf/super.c
> @@ -1948,7 +1948,6 @@ static int udf_fill_super(struct super_block *sb, void *options, int silent)
>  	sb->s_op = &udf_sb_ops;
>  	sb->s_export_op = &udf_export_ops;
>  
> -	sb->s_dirt = 0;
>  	sb->s_magic = UDF_SUPER_MAGIC;
>  	sb->s_time_gran = 1000;
>  
> @@ -2070,10 +2069,6 @@ void _udf_err(struct super_block *sb, const char *function,
>  	struct va_format vaf;
>  	va_list args;
>  
> -	/* mark sb error */
> -	if (!(sb->s_flags & MS_RDONLY))
> -		sb->s_dirt = 1;
> -
>  	va_start(args, fmt);
>  
>  	vaf.fmt = fmt;
> @@ -2135,7 +2130,6 @@ static int udf_sync_fs(struct super_block *sb, int wait)
>  		 * the buffer for IO
>  		 */
>  		mark_buffer_dirty(sbi->s_lvid_bh);
> -		sb->s_dirt = 0;
>  		sbi->s_lvid_dirty = 0;
>  	}
>  	mutex_unlock(&sbi->s_alloc_mutex);
> diff --git a/fs/udf/udfdecl.h b/fs/udf/udfdecl.h
> index ebe1031..de038da 100644
> --- a/fs/udf/udfdecl.h
> +++ b/fs/udf/udfdecl.h
> @@ -129,7 +129,6 @@ static inline void udf_updated_lvid(struct super_block *sb)
>  	WARN_ON_ONCE(((struct logicalVolIntegrityDesc *)
>  		     bh->b_data)->integrityType !=
>  		     cpu_to_le32(LVID_INTEGRITY_TYPE_OPEN));
> -	sb->s_dirt = 1;
>  	UDF_SB(sb)->s_lvid_dirty = 1;
>  }
>  extern u64 lvid_get_unique_id(struct super_block *sb);
> -- 
> 1.7.7.6
> 
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] udf: stop using s_dirt
  2012-06-04 13:44 ` Jan Kara
@ 2012-06-21 12:32   ` Artem Bityutskiy
  2012-06-21 23:29     ` Jan Kara
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Artem Bityutskiy @ 2012-06-21 12:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jan Kara; +Cc: Linux FS Maling List, Linux Kernel Maling List

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 734 bytes --]

On Mon, 2012-06-04 at 15:44 +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Mon 04-06-12 14:46:24, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> > From: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com>
> > 
> > The UDF file-system does not need the 's_dirt' superblock flag because it does
> > not define the 'write_super()' method. This flag was set to 1 in few places and
> > set to 0 in '->sync_fs()' and was basically useless. Stop using it because it
> > is on its way out.
>   Thanks. I've merged the patch to my tree.

Sorry Jan, but which one? I do not see it here at least:

git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jack/linux-fs

[I am trying to find out which bits and pieces of this work are where]

-- 
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] udf: stop using s_dirt
  2012-06-21 12:32   ` Artem Bityutskiy
@ 2012-06-21 23:29     ` Jan Kara
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jan Kara @ 2012-06-21 23:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Artem Bityutskiy; +Cc: Jan Kara, Linux FS Maling List, Linux Kernel Maling List

On Thu 21-06-12 15:32:43, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-06-04 at 15:44 +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> > On Mon 04-06-12 14:46:24, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> > > From: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com>
> > > 
> > > The UDF file-system does not need the 's_dirt' superblock flag because it does
> > > not define the 'write_super()' method. This flag was set to 1 in few places and
> > > set to 0 in '->sync_fs()' and was basically useless. Stop using it because it
> > > is on its way out.
> >   Thanks. I've merged the patch to my tree.
> 
> Sorry Jan, but which one? I do not see it here at least:
> 
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jack/linux-fs
> 
> [I am trying to find out which bits and pieces of this work are where]
  Currently it's in for_testing branch. I've pushed the tree so that you
can see it as well ;).

								Honza

-- 
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2012-06-21 23:29 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-06-04 11:46 [PATCH] udf: stop using s_dirt Artem Bityutskiy
2012-06-04 13:44 ` Jan Kara
2012-06-21 12:32   ` Artem Bityutskiy
2012-06-21 23:29     ` Jan Kara

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.