All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@linux-iscsi.org>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
Cc: target-devel <target-devel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-scsi <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
	lf-virt <virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
	kvm-devel <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Zhi Yong Wu <wuzhy@cn.ibm.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] virtio-scsi: Add vdrv->scan for post VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_DRIVER_OK LUN scanning
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2012 14:26:32 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1342041992.18004.20.camel@haakon2.linux-iscsi.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1342031856.3522.41.camel@dabdike.int.hansenpartnership.com>

On Wed, 2012-07-11 at 19:37 +0100, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-07-06 at 20:15 +0000, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> > From: Nicholas Bellinger <nab@linux-iscsi.org>
> > 
> > This patch changes virtio-scsi to use a new virtio_driver->scan() callback
> > so that scsi_scan_host() can be properly invoked once virtio_dev_probe() has
> > set add_status(dev, VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_DRIVER_OK) to signal active virtio-ring
> > operation, instead of from within virtscsi_probe().
> > 
> > This fixes a bug where SCSI LUN scanning for both virtio-scsi-raw and
> > virtio-scsi/tcm_vhost setups was happening before VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_DRIVER_OK
> > had been set, causing VIRTIO_SCSI_S_BAD_TARGET to occur.  This fixes a bug
> > with virtio-scsi/tcm_vhost where LUN scan was not detecting LUNs.
> > 
> > Tested with virtio-scsi-raw + virtio-scsi/tcm_vhost w/ IBLOCK on 3.5-rc2 code.
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
> > Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > Cc: Zhi Yong Wu <wuzhy@cn.ibm.com>
> > Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> > Cc: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
> > Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Nicholas Bellinger <nab@linux-iscsi.org>
> > ---
> >  drivers/scsi/virtio_scsi.c |   15 ++++++++++++---
> >  drivers/virtio/virtio.c    |    5 ++++-
> >  include/linux/virtio.h     |    1 +
> >  3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> This doesn't apply:
> 
> patching file drivers/scsi/virtio_scsi.c
> Hunk #1 succeeded at 677 (offset 196 lines).
> Hunk #2 FAILED at 494.
> Hunk #3 succeeded at 736 (offset 198 lines).
> 1 out of 3 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file
> drivers/scsi/virtio_scsi.c.rej
> 
> could you respin against scsi-misc head?
> 

The updated patch is on it's way rebased against scsi.git/misc.

Thanks James!


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@linux-iscsi.org>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	kvm-devel <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org, Zhi Yong Wu <wuzhy@cn.ibm.com>,
	target-devel <target-devel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-scsi <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	lf-virt <virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] virtio-scsi: Add vdrv->scan for post VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_DRIVER_OK LUN scanning
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2012 14:26:32 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1342041992.18004.20.camel@haakon2.linux-iscsi.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1342031856.3522.41.camel@dabdike.int.hansenpartnership.com>

On Wed, 2012-07-11 at 19:37 +0100, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-07-06 at 20:15 +0000, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> > From: Nicholas Bellinger <nab@linux-iscsi.org>
> > 
> > This patch changes virtio-scsi to use a new virtio_driver->scan() callback
> > so that scsi_scan_host() can be properly invoked once virtio_dev_probe() has
> > set add_status(dev, VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_DRIVER_OK) to signal active virtio-ring
> > operation, instead of from within virtscsi_probe().
> > 
> > This fixes a bug where SCSI LUN scanning for both virtio-scsi-raw and
> > virtio-scsi/tcm_vhost setups was happening before VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_DRIVER_OK
> > had been set, causing VIRTIO_SCSI_S_BAD_TARGET to occur.  This fixes a bug
> > with virtio-scsi/tcm_vhost where LUN scan was not detecting LUNs.
> > 
> > Tested with virtio-scsi-raw + virtio-scsi/tcm_vhost w/ IBLOCK on 3.5-rc2 code.
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
> > Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > Cc: Zhi Yong Wu <wuzhy@cn.ibm.com>
> > Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> > Cc: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
> > Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Nicholas Bellinger <nab@linux-iscsi.org>
> > ---
> >  drivers/scsi/virtio_scsi.c |   15 ++++++++++++---
> >  drivers/virtio/virtio.c    |    5 ++++-
> >  include/linux/virtio.h     |    1 +
> >  3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> This doesn't apply:
> 
> patching file drivers/scsi/virtio_scsi.c
> Hunk #1 succeeded at 677 (offset 196 lines).
> Hunk #2 FAILED at 494.
> Hunk #3 succeeded at 736 (offset 198 lines).
> 1 out of 3 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file
> drivers/scsi/virtio_scsi.c.rej
> 
> could you respin against scsi-misc head?
> 

The updated patch is on it's way rebased against scsi.git/misc.

Thanks James!

  reply	other threads:[~2012-07-11 21:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-07-06 20:15 [PATCH] virtio-scsi: Add vdrv->scan for post VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_DRIVER_OK LUN scanning Nicholas A. Bellinger
2012-07-06 20:15 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2012-07-06 20:19 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2012-07-06 20:19   ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2012-07-11 18:37 ` James Bottomley
2012-07-11 21:26   ` Nicholas A. Bellinger [this message]
2012-07-11 21:26     ` Nicholas A. Bellinger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1342041992.18004.20.camel@haakon2.linux-iscsi.org \
    --to=nab@linux-iscsi.org \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
    --cc=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stefanha@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=target-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=wuzhy@cn.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.