All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH v3] resource: make sure requested range is included in the root range
@ 2012-07-13 15:55 Octavian Purdila
  0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Octavian Purdila @ 2012-07-13 15:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andrew Morton; +Cc: linux-kernel, Octavian Purdila, Ram Pai

When the requested range is outside of the root range the logic in
__reserve_region_with_split will cause an infinite recursion which
will overflow the stack as seen in the warning bellow.

This particular stack overflow was caused by requesting the
(100000000-107ffffff) range while the root range was (0-ffffffff). In
this case __request_resource would return the whole root range as
conflict range (i.e. 0-ffffffff). Then, the logic in
__reserve_region_with_split would continue the recursion requesting
the new range as (conflict->end+1, end) which incidentally in this
case equals the originally requested range.

This patch aborts looking for an usable range when the request does
not intersect with the root range. When the request partially overlaps
with the root range, it ajust the request to fall in the root range
and then continues with the new request.

When the request is modified or aborted errors and a stack trace are
logged to allow catching the errors in the upper layers.

[    5.968374] WARNING: at kernel/sched.c:4129 sub_preempt_count+0x63/0x89()
[    5.975150] Modules linked in:
[    5.978184] Pid: 1, comm: swapper Not tainted 3.0.22-mid27-00004-gb72c817 #46
[    5.985324] Call Trace:
[    5.987759]  [<c1039dfc>] ? console_unlock+0x17b/0x18d
[    5.992891]  [<c1039620>] warn_slowpath_common+0x48/0x5d
[    5.998194]  [<c1031758>] ? sub_preempt_count+0x63/0x89
[    6.003412]  [<c1039644>] warn_slowpath_null+0xf/0x13
[    6.008453]  [<c1031758>] sub_preempt_count+0x63/0x89
[    6.013499]  [<c14d60c4>] _raw_spin_unlock+0x27/0x3f
[    6.018453]  [<c10c6349>] add_partial+0x36/0x3b
[    6.022973]  [<c10c7c0a>] deactivate_slab+0x96/0xb4
[    6.027842]  [<c14cf9d9>] __slab_alloc.isra.54.constprop.63+0x204/0x241
[    6.034456]  [<c103f78f>] ? kzalloc.constprop.5+0x29/0x38
[    6.039842]  [<c103f78f>] ? kzalloc.constprop.5+0x29/0x38
[    6.045232]  [<c10c7dc9>] kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x51/0xb0
[    6.050710]  [<c103f78f>] ? kzalloc.constprop.5+0x29/0x38
[    6.056100]  [<c103f78f>] kzalloc.constprop.5+0x29/0x38
[    6.061320]  [<c17b45e9>] __reserve_region_with_split+0x1c/0xd1
[    6.067230]  [<c17b4693>] __reserve_region_with_split+0xc6/0xd1
...
[    7.179057]  [<c17b4693>] __reserve_region_with_split+0xc6/0xd1
[    7.184970]  [<c17b4779>] reserve_region_with_split+0x30/0x42
[    7.190709]  [<c17a8ebf>] e820_reserve_resources_late+0xd1/0xe9
[    7.196623]  [<c17c9526>] pcibios_resource_survey+0x23/0x2a
[    7.202184]  [<c17cad8a>] pcibios_init+0x23/0x35
[    7.206789]  [<c17ca574>] pci_subsys_init+0x3f/0x44
[    7.211659]  [<c1002088>] do_one_initcall+0x72/0x122
[    7.216615]  [<c17ca535>] ? pci_legacy_init+0x3d/0x3d
[    7.221659]  [<c17a27ff>] kernel_init+0xa6/0x118
[    7.226265]  [<c17a2759>] ? start_kernel+0x334/0x334
[    7.231223]  [<c14d7482>] kernel_thread_helper+0x6/0x10

Cc: Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com>

Signed-off-by: Octavian Purdila <octavian.purdila@intel.com>
---

Changes from V2:
 * remove printk in the abort case, nothing notable to report

Changes from V1:
 * fix partial overlaps cases
 * use %pr, dump_stack()

 kernel/resource.c |   24 +++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/resource.c b/kernel/resource.c
index e1d2b8e..93d7251 100644
--- a/kernel/resource.c
+++ b/kernel/resource.c
@@ -7,6 +7,8 @@
  * Arbitrary resource management.
  */
 
+#define pr_fmt(fmt) KBUILD_MODNAME ": " fmt
+
 #include <linux/export.h>
 #include <linux/errno.h>
 #include <linux/ioport.h>
@@ -788,8 +790,28 @@ void __init reserve_region_with_split(struct resource *root,
 		resource_size_t start, resource_size_t end,
 		const char *name)
 {
+	int abort = 0;
+
 	write_lock(&resource_lock);
-	__reserve_region_with_split(root, start, end, name);
+	if (root->start > start || root->end < end) {
+		pr_err("requested range [0x%llx-0x%llx] not in root %pr\n",
+		       (unsigned long long)start, (unsigned long long)end,
+		       root);
+		if (start > root->end || end < root->start)
+			abort = 1;
+		else {
+			if (end > root->end)
+				end = root->end;
+			if (start < root->start)
+				start = root->start;
+			pr_err("fixing request to [0x%llx-0x%llx]\n",
+			       (unsigned long long)start,
+			       (unsigned long long)end);
+		}
+		dump_stack();
+	}
+	if (!abort)
+		__reserve_region_with_split(root, start, end, name);
 	write_unlock(&resource_lock);
 }
 
-- 
1.7.9.5


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] only message in thread

only message in thread, other threads:[~2012-07-13 15:55 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-07-13 15:55 [PATCH v3] resource: make sure requested range is included in the root range Octavian Purdila

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.