All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* git log reliability
@ 2012-12-17  9:26 Prasad Karmarkar
  2012-12-17  9:38 ` Tomas Carnecky
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Prasad Karmarkar @ 2012-12-17  9:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: git

Hi ,

I have been hearing from my Release Management that git log is not
reliable. Is it so ?
Is there a known instance where Git log has missed out on commits ?

Any information about this would be really helpful

Regards,
Prasad

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: git log reliability
  2012-12-17  9:26 git log reliability Prasad Karmarkar
@ 2012-12-17  9:38 ` Tomas Carnecky
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Tomas Carnecky @ 2012-12-17  9:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Prasad Karmarkar, git

On Mon, 17 Dec 2012 14:56:17 +0530, Prasad Karmarkar <prasad.s.karmarkar@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi ,
> 
> I have been hearing from my Release Management that git log is not
> reliable. Is it so ?
> Is there a known instance where Git log has missed out on commits ?
> 
> Any information about this would be really helpful

Are you talking about git skipping commits due to history simplification (read
the corresponding section in the git-log man page)?

Also, what for does your release management use git log? Maybe there is
a better way to do what you need to do.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-12-17  9:38 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-12-17  9:26 git log reliability Prasad Karmarkar
2012-12-17  9:38 ` Tomas Carnecky

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.