* 3.2 kernel?
@ 2012-12-10 14:35 Ho Wan Chan
2012-12-10 17:23 ` jordan
2013-01-18 16:50 ` Steven Rostedt
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Ho Wan Chan @ 2012-12-10 14:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-rt-users
Hi guys.
Sorry if I have asked anything wrong, but now since the kernel is now
at 3.2.35 but then the -rt patch is still at 3.2.34, I wondered why
the .35 patch is still not yet released.
Anyway I tried applying the 3.2.34 patch onto 3.2.35 and it didn't
give out any errors.
Regards,
Howard Chan (smartboyhw)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: 3.2 kernel?
2012-12-10 14:35 3.2 kernel? Ho Wan Chan
@ 2012-12-10 17:23 ` jordan
2012-12-10 17:31 ` Georgiewskiy Yuriy
2013-01-18 16:50 ` Steven Rostedt
1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: jordan @ 2012-12-10 17:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ho Wan Chan; +Cc: linux-rt-users
> Hi guys.
Hi.
> Sorry if I have asked anything wrong, but now since the kernel is now
> at 3.2.35 but then the -rt patch is still at 3.2.34, I wondered why
> the .35 patch is still not yet released.
Note: I am not an linux-rt maintainer.... but i don't think there is
some 'rule' or mandate that says the rt-devs must do point releases at
the _exact_same_time_ as the official kernels are pushed...
out of curiosity - is there some specific addition to .35 over .34
that would explain why a .35-rt release is so urgent (to you)?
> Anyway I tried applying the 3.2.34 patch onto 3.2.35 and it didn't
> give out any errors.
it looks like you have a working 3.2.35-rt kernel then ;)
cheerz
Jordan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: 3.2 kernel?
2012-12-10 17:23 ` jordan
@ 2012-12-10 17:31 ` Georgiewskiy Yuriy
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Georgiewskiy Yuriy @ 2012-12-10 17:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: jordan; +Cc: Ho Wan Chan, linux-rt-users
[-- Attachment #1: Type: TEXT/PLAIN, Size: 1555 bytes --]
On 2012-12-10 12:23 -0500, jordan wrote Ho Wan Chan:
Hi.
just wait, 2.4.35 is ony 3 days old, or use 3.2.34-rt51 for .35 if it apply cleanly,
also Debian team use it for .35 kernel too.
j>> Hi guys.
j>
j>Hi.
j>
j>> Sorry if I have asked anything wrong, but now since the kernel is now
j>> at 3.2.35 but then the -rt patch is still at 3.2.34, I wondered why
j>> the .35 patch is still not yet released.
j>
j>Note: I am not an linux-rt maintainer.... but i don't think there is
j>some 'rule' or mandate that says the rt-devs must do point releases at
j>the _exact_same_time_ as the official kernels are pushed...
j>
j>out of curiosity - is there some specific addition to .35 over .34
j>that would explain why a .35-rt release is so urgent (to you)?
j>
j>> Anyway I tried applying the 3.2.34 patch onto 3.2.35 and it didn't
j>> give out any errors.
j>
j>it looks like you have a working 3.2.35-rt kernel then ;)
j>
j>cheerz
j>
j>Jordan
j>--
j>To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in
j>the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
j>More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
j>
C уважением With Best Regards
Георгиевский Юрий. Georgiewskiy Yuriy
+7 4872 711666 +7 4872 711666
факс +7 4872 711143 fax +7 4872 711143
Компания ООО "Ай Ти Сервис" IT Service Ltd
http://nkoort.ru http://nkoort.ru
JID: GHhost@icf.org.ru JID: GHhost@icf.org.ru
YG129-RIPE YG129-RIPE
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: 3.2 kernel?
2012-12-10 14:35 3.2 kernel? Ho Wan Chan
2012-12-10 17:23 ` jordan
@ 2013-01-18 16:50 ` Steven Rostedt
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Steven Rostedt @ 2013-01-18 16:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ho Wan Chan; +Cc: linux-rt-users
On Mon, 2012-12-10 at 22:35 +0800, Ho Wan Chan wrote:
> Hi guys.
>
> Sorry if I have asked anything wrong, but now since the kernel is now
> at 3.2.35 but then the -rt patch is still at 3.2.34, I wondered why
> the .35 patch is still not yet released.
>
> Anyway I tried applying the 3.2.34 patch onto 3.2.35 and it didn't
> give out any errors.
Wow, can we get more impatient. Yeah, I know this post is old but still.
After a release comes out, I rebase the work on top of it and run
several tests. Sometimes those tests fail, and I need to investigate.
Usually they are minor issues, or something that should be ignored.
I try to make sure the -rt patch comes out within a week of the main
release. But there's times that I may let it slide 2 weeks. After that,
then sure, start complaining.
BTW, just because we work on Real-Time software, doesn't mean that we
are real-time in life. Actually, RT developers are usually the latest to
get things done. Like me replying to this email now.
-- Steve
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-01-18 16:51 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-12-10 14:35 3.2 kernel? Ho Wan Chan
2012-12-10 17:23 ` jordan
2012-12-10 17:31 ` Georgiewskiy Yuriy
2013-01-18 16:50 ` Steven Rostedt
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.