All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH v1 2/3] Ext2: mark inode dirty after the function dquot_free_block_nodirty is called
@ 2013-02-07 14:57 Wang shilong
  2013-02-07 14:57 ` [PATCH v1 3/3] Ext2: remove the static function release_blocks to optimize the kernel Wang shilong
  2013-02-07 15:45 ` [PATCH v1 2/3] Ext2: mark inode dirty after the function dquot_free_block_nodirty is called Jan Kara
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Wang shilong @ 2013-02-07 14:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: jack; +Cc: linux-ext4

From: Wang Shilong <wangsl-fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>

We should mark inode dirty after the function dquot_free_block_nodirty
is called.Besides,add a check whether it is necessary to call
dquot_free_block_nodirty functon.

Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl-fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
---
 fs/ext2/balloc.c | 15 ++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/ext2/balloc.c b/fs/ext2/balloc.c
index 22993a0..9d372bf 100644
--- a/fs/ext2/balloc.c
+++ b/fs/ext2/balloc.c
@@ -568,8 +568,11 @@ do_more:
 	}
 error_return:
 	brelse(bitmap_bh);
-	release_blocks(sb, freed);
-	dquot_free_block_nodirty(inode, freed);
+	if (freed) {
+		release_blocks(sb, freed);
+		dquot_free_block_nodirty(inode, freed);
+		mark_inode_dirty(inode);
+	}
 }
 
 /**
@@ -1412,9 +1415,11 @@ allocated:
 
 	*errp = 0;
 	brelse(bitmap_bh);
-	dquot_free_block_nodirty(inode, *count-num);
-	mark_inode_dirty(inode);
-	*count = num;
+	if (num < *count) {
+		dquot_free_block_nodirty(inode, *count-num);
+		mark_inode_dirty(inode);
+		*count = num;
+	}
 	return ret_block;
 
 io_error:
-- 
1.7.11.7


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 3/3] Ext2: remove the static function release_blocks to optimize the kernel
  2013-02-07 14:57 [PATCH v1 2/3] Ext2: mark inode dirty after the function dquot_free_block_nodirty is called Wang shilong
@ 2013-02-07 14:57 ` Wang shilong
  2013-02-07 15:45   ` Jan Kara
  2013-02-07 15:45 ` [PATCH v1 2/3] Ext2: mark inode dirty after the function dquot_free_block_nodirty is called Jan Kara
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Wang shilong @ 2013-02-07 14:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: jack; +Cc: linux-ext4

From: Wang Shilong <wangsl-fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>

Because the static function 'release_blocks' is only called
when releasing blocks,it will be more simple and efficient to
call the function 'percpu_counter_add' directly.

Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl-fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
---
 fs/ext2/balloc.c | 11 +----------
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/ext2/balloc.c b/fs/ext2/balloc.c
index 9d372bf..d5a6afd 100644
--- a/fs/ext2/balloc.c
+++ b/fs/ext2/balloc.c
@@ -159,15 +159,6 @@ read_block_bitmap(struct super_block *sb, unsigned int block_group)
 	return bh;
 }
 
-static void release_blocks(struct super_block *sb, int count)
-{
-	if (count) {
-		struct ext2_sb_info *sbi = EXT2_SB(sb);
-
-		percpu_counter_add(&sbi->s_freeblocks_counter, count);
-	}
-}

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v1 2/3] Ext2: mark inode dirty after the function dquot_free_block_nodirty is called
  2013-02-07 14:57 [PATCH v1 2/3] Ext2: mark inode dirty after the function dquot_free_block_nodirty is called Wang shilong
  2013-02-07 14:57 ` [PATCH v1 3/3] Ext2: remove the static function release_blocks to optimize the kernel Wang shilong
@ 2013-02-07 15:45 ` Jan Kara
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jan Kara @ 2013-02-07 15:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Wang shilong; +Cc: jack, linux-ext4

On Thu 07-02-13 22:57:53, Wang shilong wrote:
> From: Wang Shilong <wangsl-fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
> 
> We should mark inode dirty after the function dquot_free_block_nodirty
> is called.Besides,add a check whether it is necessary to call
> dquot_free_block_nodirty functon.
  Thanks. I've added the patch to my tree.

								Honza
> 
> Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl-fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
> ---
>  fs/ext2/balloc.c | 15 ++++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/ext2/balloc.c b/fs/ext2/balloc.c
> index 22993a0..9d372bf 100644
> --- a/fs/ext2/balloc.c
> +++ b/fs/ext2/balloc.c
> @@ -568,8 +568,11 @@ do_more:
>  	}
>  error_return:
>  	brelse(bitmap_bh);
> -	release_blocks(sb, freed);
> -	dquot_free_block_nodirty(inode, freed);
> +	if (freed) {
> +		release_blocks(sb, freed);
> +		dquot_free_block_nodirty(inode, freed);
> +		mark_inode_dirty(inode);
> +	}
>  }
>  
>  /**
> @@ -1412,9 +1415,11 @@ allocated:
>  
>  	*errp = 0;
>  	brelse(bitmap_bh);
> -	dquot_free_block_nodirty(inode, *count-num);
> -	mark_inode_dirty(inode);
> -	*count = num;
> +	if (num < *count) {
> +		dquot_free_block_nodirty(inode, *count-num);
> +		mark_inode_dirty(inode);
> +		*count = num;
> +	}
>  	return ret_block;
>  
>  io_error:
> -- 
> 1.7.11.7
> 
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v1 3/3] Ext2: remove the static function release_blocks to optimize the kernel
  2013-02-07 14:57 ` [PATCH v1 3/3] Ext2: remove the static function release_blocks to optimize the kernel Wang shilong
@ 2013-02-07 15:45   ` Jan Kara
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Jan Kara @ 2013-02-07 15:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Wang shilong; +Cc: jack, linux-ext4

On Thu 07-02-13 22:57:54, Wang shilong wrote:
> From: Wang Shilong <wangsl-fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
> 
> Because the static function 'release_blocks' is only called
> when releasing blocks,it will be more simple and efficient to
> call the function 'percpu_counter_add' directly.
  Thanks. I've added the patch to my tree.

							Honza
> 
> Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl-fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
> ---
>  fs/ext2/balloc.c | 11 +----------
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/ext2/balloc.c b/fs/ext2/balloc.c
> index 9d372bf..d5a6afd 100644
> --- a/fs/ext2/balloc.c
> +++ b/fs/ext2/balloc.c
> @@ -159,15 +159,6 @@ read_block_bitmap(struct super_block *sb, unsigned int block_group)
>  	return bh;
>  }
>  
> -static void release_blocks(struct super_block *sb, int count)
> -{
> -	if (count) {
> -		struct ext2_sb_info *sbi = EXT2_SB(sb);
> -
> -		percpu_counter_add(&sbi->s_freeblocks_counter, count);
> -	}
> -}
> -
>  static void group_adjust_blocks(struct super_block *sb, int group_no,
>  	struct ext2_group_desc *desc, struct buffer_head *bh, int count)
>  {
> @@ -569,7 +560,7 @@ do_more:
>  error_return:
>  	brelse(bitmap_bh);
>  	if (freed) {
> -		release_blocks(sb, freed);
> +		percpu_counter_add(&sbi->s_freeblocks_counter, freed);
>  		dquot_free_block_nodirty(inode, freed);
>  		mark_inode_dirty(inode);
>  	}
> -- 
> 1.7.11.7
> 
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2013-02-07 15:45 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-02-07 14:57 [PATCH v1 2/3] Ext2: mark inode dirty after the function dquot_free_block_nodirty is called Wang shilong
2013-02-07 14:57 ` [PATCH v1 3/3] Ext2: remove the static function release_blocks to optimize the kernel Wang shilong
2013-02-07 15:45   ` Jan Kara
2013-02-07 15:45 ` [PATCH v1 2/3] Ext2: mark inode dirty after the function dquot_free_block_nodirty is called Jan Kara

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.