All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] drm/i915: Extract ring init from hw_init
@ 2013-02-08 18:17 Ben Widawsky
  2013-02-08 19:42 ` [PATCH v2] " Ben Widawsky
  2013-02-08 19:49 ` [PATCH v3] " Ben Widawsky
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Ben Widawsky @ 2013-02-08 18:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: intel-gfx; +Cc: Ben Widawsky

The ring initialization will differ a bit in upcoming generations, and
this split will prepare the code for what's needed.

This patch also fixes a bug introduced in:
commit 99433931950f33039d9e1a52b4ed9af3f1b58e84
Author: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Tue Jan 22 14:12:17 2013 +0200

    drm/i915: use gem_set_seqno() on hardware init

After doing the extraction, the bad error handling became obvious.  I
acknowledge that this should be two patches, but it's a pretty
small/trivial patch. If requested, I can certainly do the fix as a
distinct patch.

Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 53 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
index d746177..82cc23e 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
@@ -3922,22 +3922,11 @@ intel_enable_blt(struct drm_device *dev)
 	return true;
 }
 
-int
-i915_gem_init_hw(struct drm_device *dev)
+static int i915_gem_init_rings(struct drm_device *dev)
 {
-	drm_i915_private_t *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
+	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
 	int ret;
 
-	if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen < 6 && !intel_enable_gtt())
-		return -EIO;
-
-	if (IS_HASWELL(dev) && (I915_READ(0x120010) == 1))
-		I915_WRITE(0x9008, I915_READ(0x9008) | 0xf0000);
-
-	i915_gem_l3_remap(dev);
-
-	i915_gem_init_swizzling(dev);
-
 	ret = intel_init_render_ring_buffer(dev);
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
@@ -3956,6 +3945,38 @@ i915_gem_init_hw(struct drm_device *dev)
 
 	ret = i915_gem_set_seqno(dev, ((u32)~0 - 0x1000));
 	if (ret)
+		goto cleanup_blt_ring;
+
+	return 0;
+
+cleanup_blt_ring:
+	intel_init_blt_ring_buffer(&dev_priv->ring[BCS]);
+cleanup_bsd_ring:
+	intel_cleanup_ring_buffer(&dev_priv->ring[VCS]);
+cleanup_render_ring:
+	intel_cleanup_ring_buffer(&dev_priv->ring[RCS]);
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
+int
+i915_gem_init_hw(struct drm_device *dev)
+{
+	drm_i915_private_t *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
+	int ret;
+
+	if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen < 6 && !intel_enable_gtt())
+		return -EIO;
+
+	if (IS_HASWELL(dev) && (I915_READ(0x120010) == 1))
+		I915_WRITE(0x9008, I915_READ(0x9008) | 0xf0000);
+
+	i915_gem_l3_remap(dev);
+
+	i915_gem_init_swizzling(dev);
+
+	ret = i915_gem_init_rings(dev);
+	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 
 	/*
@@ -3966,12 +3987,6 @@ i915_gem_init_hw(struct drm_device *dev)
 	i915_gem_init_ppgtt(dev);
 
 	return 0;
-
-cleanup_bsd_ring:
-	intel_cleanup_ring_buffer(&dev_priv->ring[VCS]);
-cleanup_render_ring:
-	intel_cleanup_ring_buffer(&dev_priv->ring[RCS]);
-	return ret;
 }
 
 int i915_gem_init(struct drm_device *dev)
-- 
1.8.1.2

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2] drm/i915: Extract ring init from hw_init
  2013-02-08 18:17 [PATCH] drm/i915: Extract ring init from hw_init Ben Widawsky
@ 2013-02-08 19:42 ` Ben Widawsky
  2013-02-08 19:49 ` [PATCH v3] " Ben Widawsky
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Ben Widawsky @ 2013-02-08 19:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: intel-gfx; +Cc: Ben Widawsky

The ring initialization will differ a bit in upcoming generations, and
this split will prepare the code for what's needed.

This patch also fixes a bug introduced in:
commit 99433931950f33039d9e1a52b4ed9af3f1b58e84
Author: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Tue Jan 22 14:12:17 2013 +0200

    drm/i915: use gem_set_seqno() on hardware init

After doing the extraction, the bad error handling became obvious.  I
acknowledge that this should be two patches, but it's a pretty
small/trivial patch. If requested, I can certainly do the fix as a
distinct patch.

v2: Should be cleanup blt, not init blt on failure (Chris)

Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 53 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
index d746177..82cc23e 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
@@ -3922,22 +3922,11 @@ intel_enable_blt(struct drm_device *dev)
 	return true;
 }
 
-int
-i915_gem_init_hw(struct drm_device *dev)
+static int i915_gem_init_rings(struct drm_device *dev)
 {
-	drm_i915_private_t *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
+	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
 	int ret;
 
-	if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen < 6 && !intel_enable_gtt())
-		return -EIO;
-
-	if (IS_HASWELL(dev) && (I915_READ(0x120010) == 1))
-		I915_WRITE(0x9008, I915_READ(0x9008) | 0xf0000);
-
-	i915_gem_l3_remap(dev);
-
-	i915_gem_init_swizzling(dev);
-
 	ret = intel_init_render_ring_buffer(dev);
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
@@ -3956,6 +3945,38 @@ i915_gem_init_hw(struct drm_device *dev)
 
 	ret = i915_gem_set_seqno(dev, ((u32)~0 - 0x1000));
 	if (ret)
+		goto cleanup_blt_ring;
+
+	return 0;
+
+cleanup_blt_ring:
+	intel_init_blt_ring_buffer(&dev_priv->ring[BCS]);
+cleanup_bsd_ring:
+	intel_cleanup_ring_buffer(&dev_priv->ring[VCS]);
+cleanup_render_ring:
+	intel_cleanup_ring_buffer(&dev_priv->ring[RCS]);
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
+int
+i915_gem_init_hw(struct drm_device *dev)
+{
+	drm_i915_private_t *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
+	int ret;
+
+	if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen < 6 && !intel_enable_gtt())
+		return -EIO;
+
+	if (IS_HASWELL(dev) && (I915_READ(0x120010) == 1))
+		I915_WRITE(0x9008, I915_READ(0x9008) | 0xf0000);
+
+	i915_gem_l3_remap(dev);
+
+	i915_gem_init_swizzling(dev);
+
+	ret = i915_gem_init_rings(dev);
+	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 
 	/*
@@ -3966,12 +3987,6 @@ i915_gem_init_hw(struct drm_device *dev)
 	i915_gem_init_ppgtt(dev);
 
 	return 0;
-
-cleanup_bsd_ring:
-	intel_cleanup_ring_buffer(&dev_priv->ring[VCS]);
-cleanup_render_ring:
-	intel_cleanup_ring_buffer(&dev_priv->ring[RCS]);
-	return ret;
 }
 
 int i915_gem_init(struct drm_device *dev)
-- 
1.8.1.2

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v3] drm/i915: Extract ring init from hw_init
  2013-02-08 18:17 [PATCH] drm/i915: Extract ring init from hw_init Ben Widawsky
  2013-02-08 19:42 ` [PATCH v2] " Ben Widawsky
@ 2013-02-08 19:49 ` Ben Widawsky
  2013-02-09 23:07   ` Daniel Vetter
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Ben Widawsky @ 2013-02-08 19:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: intel-gfx; +Cc: Ben Widawsky

The ring initialization will differ a bit in upcoming generations, and
this split will prepare the code for what's needed.

This patch also fixes a bug introduced in:
commit 99433931950f33039d9e1a52b4ed9af3f1b58e84
Author: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Tue Jan 22 14:12:17 2013 +0200

    drm/i915: use gem_set_seqno() on hardware init

After doing the extraction, the bad error handling became obvious.  I
acknowledge that this should be two patches, but it's a pretty
small/trivial patch. If requested, I can certainly do the fix as a
distinct patch.

v2: Should be cleanup blt, not init blt on failure (Chris)

v3: Forgot to git add on v2

Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 53 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
index d746177..73b1e9e 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
@@ -3922,22 +3922,11 @@ intel_enable_blt(struct drm_device *dev)
 	return true;
 }
 
-int
-i915_gem_init_hw(struct drm_device *dev)
+static int i915_gem_init_rings(struct drm_device *dev)
 {
-	drm_i915_private_t *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
+	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
 	int ret;
 
-	if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen < 6 && !intel_enable_gtt())
-		return -EIO;
-
-	if (IS_HASWELL(dev) && (I915_READ(0x120010) == 1))
-		I915_WRITE(0x9008, I915_READ(0x9008) | 0xf0000);
-
-	i915_gem_l3_remap(dev);
-
-	i915_gem_init_swizzling(dev);
-
 	ret = intel_init_render_ring_buffer(dev);
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
@@ -3956,6 +3945,38 @@ i915_gem_init_hw(struct drm_device *dev)
 
 	ret = i915_gem_set_seqno(dev, ((u32)~0 - 0x1000));
 	if (ret)
+		goto cleanup_blt_ring;
+
+	return 0;
+
+cleanup_blt_ring:
+	intel_cleanup_ring_buffer(&dev_priv->ring[BCS]);
+cleanup_bsd_ring:
+	intel_cleanup_ring_buffer(&dev_priv->ring[VCS]);
+cleanup_render_ring:
+	intel_cleanup_ring_buffer(&dev_priv->ring[RCS]);
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
+int
+i915_gem_init_hw(struct drm_device *dev)
+{
+	drm_i915_private_t *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
+	int ret;
+
+	if (INTEL_INFO(dev)->gen < 6 && !intel_enable_gtt())
+		return -EIO;
+
+	if (IS_HASWELL(dev) && (I915_READ(0x120010) == 1))
+		I915_WRITE(0x9008, I915_READ(0x9008) | 0xf0000);
+
+	i915_gem_l3_remap(dev);
+
+	i915_gem_init_swizzling(dev);
+
+	ret = i915_gem_init_rings(dev);
+	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 
 	/*
@@ -3966,12 +3987,6 @@ i915_gem_init_hw(struct drm_device *dev)
 	i915_gem_init_ppgtt(dev);
 
 	return 0;
-
-cleanup_bsd_ring:
-	intel_cleanup_ring_buffer(&dev_priv->ring[VCS]);
-cleanup_render_ring:
-	intel_cleanup_ring_buffer(&dev_priv->ring[RCS]);
-	return ret;
 }
 
 int i915_gem_init(struct drm_device *dev)
-- 
1.8.1.2

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3] drm/i915: Extract ring init from hw_init
  2013-02-08 19:49 ` [PATCH v3] " Ben Widawsky
@ 2013-02-09 23:07   ` Daniel Vetter
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Vetter @ 2013-02-09 23:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ben Widawsky; +Cc: intel-gfx

On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 11:49:24AM -0800, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> The ring initialization will differ a bit in upcoming generations, and
> this split will prepare the code for what's needed.
> 
> This patch also fixes a bug introduced in:
> commit 99433931950f33039d9e1a52b4ed9af3f1b58e84
> Author: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
> Date:   Tue Jan 22 14:12:17 2013 +0200
> 
>     drm/i915: use gem_set_seqno() on hardware init
> 
> After doing the extraction, the bad error handling became obvious.  I
> acknowledge that this should be two patches, but it's a pretty
> small/trivial patch. If requested, I can certainly do the fix as a
> distinct patch.
> 
> v2: Should be cleanup blt, not init blt on failure (Chris)
> 
> v3: Forgot to git add on v2
> 
> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>

Queued for -next, thanks for the patch.
-Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-02-09 23:04 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-02-08 18:17 [PATCH] drm/i915: Extract ring init from hw_init Ben Widawsky
2013-02-08 19:42 ` [PATCH v2] " Ben Widawsky
2013-02-08 19:49 ` [PATCH v3] " Ben Widawsky
2013-02-09 23:07   ` Daniel Vetter

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.