From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Michael Wang <wangyun@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>,
Alex Shi <alex.shi@intel.com>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"Nikunj A. Dadhania" <nikunj@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Ram Pai <linuxram@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: wake-affine throttle
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 12:23:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1366626208.2721.12.camel@laptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5164DCE7.8080906@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
OK,.. Ingo said that pipe-test was the original motivation for
wake_affine() and since that's currently broken to pieces due to
select_idle_sibling() is there still a benefit to having it at all?
Can anybody find any significant regression when simply killing
wake_affine()?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-22 10:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-10 3:30 [PATCH] sched: wake-affine throttle Michael Wang
2013-04-10 4:16 ` Alex Shi
2013-04-10 5:11 ` Michael Wang
2013-04-10 5:27 ` Alex Shi
2013-04-10 8:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-04-10 9:22 ` Michael Wang
2013-04-11 6:01 ` Michael Wang
2013-04-11 7:30 ` Mike Galbraith
2013-04-11 8:26 ` Michael Wang
2013-04-11 8:44 ` Mike Galbraith
2013-04-11 9:00 ` Mike Galbraith
2013-04-11 9:02 ` Michael Wang
2013-04-12 3:17 ` Michael Wang
2013-04-22 4:21 ` Michael Wang
2013-04-22 5:27 ` Mike Galbraith
2013-04-22 6:19 ` Michael Wang
2013-04-22 10:23 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2013-04-22 10:35 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-04-23 4:05 ` Michael Wang
2013-04-22 17:49 ` Paul Turner
2013-04-23 4:01 ` Michael Wang
2013-04-27 2:46 ` Michael Wang
2013-05-02 5:48 ` Michael Wang
2013-05-02 7:10 ` Mike Galbraith
2013-05-02 7:36 ` Michael Wang
2013-05-03 3:46 ` Michael Wang
2013-05-03 5:01 ` Mike Galbraith
2013-05-03 5:57 ` Michael Wang
2013-05-03 6:14 ` Mike Galbraith
2013-05-04 2:20 ` Michael Wang
2013-05-07 2:46 ` Michael Wang
2013-05-13 2:27 ` Michael Wang
2013-05-16 7:40 ` Michael Wang
2013-05-16 7:45 ` Michael Wang
2013-05-21 3:20 ` [PATCH v2] " Michael Wang
2013-05-21 6:47 ` Alex Shi
2013-05-21 6:52 ` Michael Wang
2013-05-22 8:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-05-22 9:25 ` Michael Wang
2013-05-22 14:55 ` Mike Galbraith
2013-05-23 2:12 ` Michael Wang
2013-05-28 5:02 ` Michael Wang
2013-05-28 6:29 ` Mike Galbraith
2013-05-28 7:22 ` Michael Wang
2013-05-28 8:49 ` Mike Galbraith
2013-05-28 8:56 ` Michael Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1366626208.2721.12.camel@laptop \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alex.shi@intel.com \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxram@us.ibm.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=nikunj@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=pjt@google.com \
--cc=wangyun@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.