All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Holzheu <holzheu@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>,
	HATAYAMA Daisuke <d.hatayama@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Jan Willeke <willeke@de.ibm.com>,
	Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
	Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] kdump/mmap: Fix mmap of /proc/vmcore for s390
Date: Fri, 24 May 2013 15:08:07 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1369400889-11064-1-git-send-email-holzheu@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)

Hello Vivek and Hatayama,

Currently the /proc/vmcore mmap patches are not working on s390. The
problem is that on s390 the kernel in not relocatable and therefore
always runs in the lower memory area. Therefore for kdump on s390 we
swap the lower memory area with the crashkernel area before starting
the kdump kernel:

[0 - OLDMEM_SIZE] is mapped to [OLDMEM_BASE - OLDMEM_BASE + OLDMEM_SIZE]

To fix /proc/vmcore mmap memory below OLDMEMSIZE needs to be mapped
with OLDMEM_BASE as offset. To achieve that, a new weak function
arch_oldmem_remap_pfn_range() is introduced.

If you agree with our approach, could you integrate the two patches
into the mmap patch series?

Best Regards,
Michael

---
Jan Willeke (2):
  kdump/mmap: Introduce arch_oldmem_remap_pfn_range()
  s390/kdump/mmap: Implement arch_oldmem_remap_pfn_range() for s390

 arch/s390/kernel/crash_dump.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 fs/proc/vmcore.c              | 15 ++++++++++++++-
 include/linux/crash_dump.h    |  5 +++++
 3 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

-- 
1.8.1.6


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Michael Holzheu <holzheu@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>,
	HATAYAMA Daisuke <d.hatayama@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
	kexec@lists.infradead.org,
	Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
	Jan Willeke <willeke@de.ibm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] kdump/mmap: Fix mmap of /proc/vmcore for s390
Date: Fri, 24 May 2013 15:08:07 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1369400889-11064-1-git-send-email-holzheu@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)

Hello Vivek and Hatayama,

Currently the /proc/vmcore mmap patches are not working on s390. The
problem is that on s390 the kernel in not relocatable and therefore
always runs in the lower memory area. Therefore for kdump on s390 we
swap the lower memory area with the crashkernel area before starting
the kdump kernel:

[0 - OLDMEM_SIZE] is mapped to [OLDMEM_BASE - OLDMEM_BASE + OLDMEM_SIZE]

To fix /proc/vmcore mmap memory below OLDMEMSIZE needs to be mapped
with OLDMEM_BASE as offset. To achieve that, a new weak function
arch_oldmem_remap_pfn_range() is introduced.

If you agree with our approach, could you integrate the two patches
into the mmap patch series?

Best Regards,
Michael

---
Jan Willeke (2):
  kdump/mmap: Introduce arch_oldmem_remap_pfn_range()
  s390/kdump/mmap: Implement arch_oldmem_remap_pfn_range() for s390

 arch/s390/kernel/crash_dump.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 fs/proc/vmcore.c              | 15 ++++++++++++++-
 include/linux/crash_dump.h    |  5 +++++
 3 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

-- 
1.8.1.6


_______________________________________________
kexec mailing list
kexec@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/kexec

             reply	other threads:[~2013-05-24 13:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-05-24 13:08 Michael Holzheu [this message]
2013-05-24 13:08 ` [PATCH 0/2] kdump/mmap: Fix mmap of /proc/vmcore for s390 Michael Holzheu
2013-05-24 13:08 ` [PATCH 1/2] kdump/mmap: Introduce arch_oldmem_remap_pfn_range() Michael Holzheu
2013-05-24 13:08   ` Michael Holzheu
2013-05-24 13:08 ` [PATCH 2/2] s390/kdump/mmap: Implement arch_oldmem_remap_pfn_range() for s390 Michael Holzheu
2013-05-24 13:08   ` Michael Holzheu
2013-05-24 14:36 ` [PATCH 0/2] kdump/mmap: Fix mmap of /proc/vmcore " Vivek Goyal
2013-05-24 14:36   ` Vivek Goyal
2013-05-24 15:06   ` Michael Holzheu
2013-05-24 15:06     ` Michael Holzheu
2013-05-24 15:28     ` Vivek Goyal
2013-05-24 15:28       ` Vivek Goyal
2013-05-24 16:46       ` Michael Holzheu
2013-05-24 16:46         ` Michael Holzheu
2013-05-24 17:05         ` Vivek Goyal
2013-05-24 17:05           ` Vivek Goyal
2013-05-25 13:13           ` Michael Holzheu
2013-05-25 13:13             ` Michael Holzheu
2013-05-24 22:44       ` Eric W. Biederman
2013-05-24 22:44         ` Eric W. Biederman
2013-05-25  0:33         ` Zhang Yanfei
2013-05-25  0:33           ` Zhang Yanfei
2013-05-25  3:01           ` Eric W. Biederman
2013-05-25  3:01             ` Eric W. Biederman
2013-05-25  8:31             ` Zhang Yanfei
2013-05-25  8:31               ` Zhang Yanfei
2013-05-25 12:52               ` Michael Holzheu
2013-05-25 12:52                 ` Michael Holzheu
2013-05-28 13:55                 ` Vivek Goyal
2013-05-28 13:55                   ` Vivek Goyal
2013-05-29 11:51                   ` Michael Holzheu
2013-05-29 11:51                     ` Michael Holzheu
2013-05-29 16:23                     ` Vivek Goyal
2013-05-29 16:23                       ` Vivek Goyal
2013-05-29 17:12                       ` Michael Holzheu
2013-05-29 17:12                         ` Michael Holzheu
2013-05-30 15:00                         ` Vivek Goyal
2013-05-30 15:00                           ` Vivek Goyal
2013-05-30 20:38                     ` Vivek Goyal
2013-05-30 20:38                       ` Vivek Goyal
2013-05-31 14:21                       ` Michael Holzheu
2013-05-31 14:21                         ` Michael Holzheu
2013-05-31 16:01                         ` Vivek Goyal
2013-05-31 16:01                           ` Vivek Goyal
2013-06-03 13:27                           ` Michael Holzheu
2013-06-03 13:27                             ` Michael Holzheu
2013-06-03 15:59                             ` Vivek Goyal
2013-06-03 15:59                               ` Vivek Goyal
2013-06-03 16:48                               ` Michael Holzheu
2013-06-03 16:48                                 ` Michael Holzheu
2013-05-28 14:44                 ` Vivek Goyal
2013-05-28 14:44                   ` Vivek Goyal
2013-05-25 20:36               ` Eric W. Biederman
2013-05-25 20:36                 ` Eric W. Biederman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1369400889-11064-1-git-send-email-holzheu@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=holzheu@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=d.hatayama@jp.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
    --cc=willeke@de.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.