All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH 0/2] R-Car GPIO fixes
@ 2013-06-17 19:15 ` Laurent Pinchart
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Laurent Pinchart @ 2013-06-17 19:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel

Hello,

Here are two small fixes for the gpio-rcar driver. I would push them through
the GPIO tree if it wasn't for the fact that they're based on gpio-rcar DT
support, scheduled for merge through the ARM SoC tree.

Simon, as these patches are fixes, would it be possible to get them in v3.11
through your tree ?

Laurent Pinchart (2):
  gpio-rcar: Reference core gpio documentation in the DT bindings
  gpio-rcar: Remove #ifdef CONFIG_OF around OF-specific sections

 .../devicetree/bindings/gpio/renesas,gpio-rcar.txt     | 18 ++++++------------
 drivers/gpio/gpio-rcar.c                               |  8 ++------
 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 0/2] R-Car GPIO fixes
@ 2013-06-17 19:15 ` Laurent Pinchart
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Laurent Pinchart @ 2013-06-17 19:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel

Hello,

Here are two small fixes for the gpio-rcar driver. I would push them through
the GPIO tree if it wasn't for the fact that they're based on gpio-rcar DT
support, scheduled for merge through the ARM SoC tree.

Simon, as these patches are fixes, would it be possible to get them in v3.11
through your tree ?

Laurent Pinchart (2):
  gpio-rcar: Reference core gpio documentation in the DT bindings
  gpio-rcar: Remove #ifdef CONFIG_OF around OF-specific sections

 .../devicetree/bindings/gpio/renesas,gpio-rcar.txt     | 18 ++++++------------
 drivers/gpio/gpio-rcar.c                               |  8 ++------
 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 1/2] gpio-rcar: Reference core gpio documentation in the DT bindings
  2013-06-17 19:15 ` Laurent Pinchart
@ 2013-06-17 19:15   ` Laurent Pinchart
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Laurent Pinchart @ 2013-06-17 19:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel

Replaced the detailed gpio-ranges documentation with a reference to the
code gpio DT bindings, and mention the gpio flags symbolic names.

Cc: devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org
Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com>
---
 .../devicetree/bindings/gpio/renesas,gpio-rcar.txt     | 18 ++++++------------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/renesas,gpio-rcar.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/renesas,gpio-rcar.txt
index 46d76a0..cb3dc7b 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/renesas,gpio-rcar.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/renesas,gpio-rcar.txt
@@ -16,18 +16,12 @@ Required Properties:
 
   - gpio-controller: Marks the device node as a gpio controller.
   - #gpio-cells: Should be 2. The first cell is the GPIO number and the second
-    cell is used to specify optional parameters as bit flags. Only the GPIO
-    active low flag (bit 0) is currently supported.
-  - gpio-ranges: Range of pins managed by the GPIO controller as a 4-cells
-    tuple using the following syntax.
-
-    <[phandle of the pin controller node]
-     0
-     [index of the first pin]
-     [number of pins]>
-
-Please refer to gpio.txt in this directory for details of the common GPIO
-bindings used by client devices.
+    cell specifies GPIO flags, as defined in <dt-bindings/gpio/gpio.h>. Only the
+    GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH and GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW flags are supported.
+  - gpio-ranges: Range of pins managed by the GPIO controller.
+
+Please refer to gpio.txt in this directory for details of gpio-ranges property
+and the common GPIO bindings used by client devices.
 
 Example: R8A7779 (R-Car H1) GPIO controller nodes
 
-- 
1.8.1.5


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 1/2] gpio-rcar: Reference core gpio documentation in the DT bindings
@ 2013-06-17 19:15   ` Laurent Pinchart
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Laurent Pinchart @ 2013-06-17 19:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel

Replaced the detailed gpio-ranges documentation with a reference to the
code gpio DT bindings, and mention the gpio flags symbolic names.

Cc: devicetree-discuss at lists.ozlabs.org
Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com>
---
 .../devicetree/bindings/gpio/renesas,gpio-rcar.txt     | 18 ++++++------------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/renesas,gpio-rcar.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/renesas,gpio-rcar.txt
index 46d76a0..cb3dc7b 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/renesas,gpio-rcar.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/renesas,gpio-rcar.txt
@@ -16,18 +16,12 @@ Required Properties:
 
   - gpio-controller: Marks the device node as a gpio controller.
   - #gpio-cells: Should be 2. The first cell is the GPIO number and the second
-    cell is used to specify optional parameters as bit flags. Only the GPIO
-    active low flag (bit 0) is currently supported.
-  - gpio-ranges: Range of pins managed by the GPIO controller as a 4-cells
-    tuple using the following syntax.
-
-    <[phandle of the pin controller node]
-     0
-     [index of the first pin]
-     [number of pins]>
-
-Please refer to gpio.txt in this directory for details of the common GPIO
-bindings used by client devices.
+    cell specifies GPIO flags, as defined in <dt-bindings/gpio/gpio.h>. Only the
+    GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH and GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW flags are supported.
+  - gpio-ranges: Range of pins managed by the GPIO controller.
+
+Please refer to gpio.txt in this directory for details of gpio-ranges property
+and the common GPIO bindings used by client devices.
 
 Example: R8A7779 (R-Car H1) GPIO controller nodes
 
-- 
1.8.1.5

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 2/2] gpio-rcar: Remove #ifdef CONFIG_OF around OF-specific sections
  2013-06-17 19:15 ` Laurent Pinchart
@ 2013-06-17 19:15   ` Laurent Pinchart
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Laurent Pinchart @ 2013-06-17 19:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel

All functions and data types used by OF-specific code paths are declared
in <linux/of.h> regardless of CONFIG_OF. Replace the #ifdef CONFIG_OF
guard with a if(IS_SELECTED(CONFIG_OF)) and let the compiler optimize
the unused code away.

Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com>
---
 drivers/gpio/gpio-rcar.c | 8 ++------
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-rcar.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-rcar.c
index 5a693dd..7fd09ef 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-rcar.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-rcar.c
@@ -279,16 +279,13 @@ static struct irq_domain_ops gpio_rcar_irq_domain_ops = {
 static void gpio_rcar_parse_pdata(struct gpio_rcar_priv *p)
 {
 	struct gpio_rcar_config *pdata = p->pdev->dev.platform_data;
-#ifdef CONFIG_OF
 	struct device_node *np = p->pdev->dev.of_node;
 	struct of_phandle_args args;
 	int ret;
-#endif
 
-	if (pdata)
+	if (pdata) {
 		p->config = *pdata;
-#ifdef CONFIG_OF
-	else if (np) {
+	} else if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF) && np) {
 		ret = of_parse_phandle_with_args(np, "gpio-ranges",
 				"#gpio-range-cells", 0, &args);
 		p->config.number_of_pins = ret = 0 && args.args_count = 3
@@ -296,7 +293,6 @@ static void gpio_rcar_parse_pdata(struct gpio_rcar_priv *p)
 					 : RCAR_MAX_GPIO_PER_BANK;
 		p->config.gpio_base = -1;
 	}
-#endif
 
 	if (p->config.number_of_pins = 0 ||
 	    p->config.number_of_pins > RCAR_MAX_GPIO_PER_BANK) {
-- 
1.8.1.5


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 2/2] gpio-rcar: Remove #ifdef CONFIG_OF around OF-specific sections
@ 2013-06-17 19:15   ` Laurent Pinchart
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Laurent Pinchart @ 2013-06-17 19:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel

All functions and data types used by OF-specific code paths are declared
in <linux/of.h> regardless of CONFIG_OF. Replace the #ifdef CONFIG_OF
guard with a if(IS_SELECTED(CONFIG_OF)) and let the compiler optimize
the unused code away.

Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com>
---
 drivers/gpio/gpio-rcar.c | 8 ++------
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-rcar.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-rcar.c
index 5a693dd..7fd09ef 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-rcar.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-rcar.c
@@ -279,16 +279,13 @@ static struct irq_domain_ops gpio_rcar_irq_domain_ops = {
 static void gpio_rcar_parse_pdata(struct gpio_rcar_priv *p)
 {
 	struct gpio_rcar_config *pdata = p->pdev->dev.platform_data;
-#ifdef CONFIG_OF
 	struct device_node *np = p->pdev->dev.of_node;
 	struct of_phandle_args args;
 	int ret;
-#endif
 
-	if (pdata)
+	if (pdata) {
 		p->config = *pdata;
-#ifdef CONFIG_OF
-	else if (np) {
+	} else if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF) && np) {
 		ret = of_parse_phandle_with_args(np, "gpio-ranges",
 				"#gpio-range-cells", 0, &args);
 		p->config.number_of_pins = ret == 0 && args.args_count == 3
@@ -296,7 +293,6 @@ static void gpio_rcar_parse_pdata(struct gpio_rcar_priv *p)
 					 : RCAR_MAX_GPIO_PER_BANK;
 		p->config.gpio_base = -1;
 	}
-#endif
 
 	if (p->config.number_of_pins == 0 ||
 	    p->config.number_of_pins > RCAR_MAX_GPIO_PER_BANK) {
-- 
1.8.1.5

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 2/2] gpio-rcar: Remove #ifdef CONFIG_OF around OF-specific sections
  2013-06-17 19:15   ` Laurent Pinchart
@ 2013-06-17 19:19     ` Sergei Shtylyov
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Sergei Shtylyov @ 2013-06-17 19:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel

Hello.

On 06/17/2013 11:15 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:

> All functions and data types used by OF-specific code paths are declared
> in <linux/of.h> regardless of CONFIG_OF. Replace the #ifdef CONFIG_OF
> guard with a if(IS_SELECTED(CONFIG_OF)) and let the compiler optimize

    You're using IS_ENABLED() actually.

> the unused code away.

> Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com>
> ---
>   drivers/gpio/gpio-rcar.c | 8 ++------
>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-rcar.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-rcar.c
> index 5a693dd..7fd09ef 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-rcar.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-rcar.c
> @@ -279,16 +279,13 @@ static struct irq_domain_ops gpio_rcar_irq_domain_ops = {
>   static void gpio_rcar_parse_pdata(struct gpio_rcar_priv *p)
>   {
>   	struct gpio_rcar_config *pdata = p->pdev->dev.platform_data;
> -#ifdef CONFIG_OF
>   	struct device_node *np = p->pdev->dev.of_node;
>   	struct of_phandle_args args;
>   	int ret;
> -#endif
>
> -	if (pdata)
> +	if (pdata) {
>   		p->config = *pdata;
> -#ifdef CONFIG_OF
> -	else if (np) {
> +	} else if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF) && np) {
>   		ret = of_parse_phandle_with_args(np, "gpio-ranges",
>   				"#gpio-range-cells", 0, &args);
>   		p->config.number_of_pins = ret = 0 && args.args_count = 3

WBR, Sergei



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 2/2] gpio-rcar: Remove #ifdef CONFIG_OF around OF-specific sections
@ 2013-06-17 19:19     ` Sergei Shtylyov
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Sergei Shtylyov @ 2013-06-17 19:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel

Hello.

On 06/17/2013 11:15 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:

> All functions and data types used by OF-specific code paths are declared
> in <linux/of.h> regardless of CONFIG_OF. Replace the #ifdef CONFIG_OF
> guard with a if(IS_SELECTED(CONFIG_OF)) and let the compiler optimize

    You're using IS_ENABLED() actually.

> the unused code away.

> Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com>
> ---
>   drivers/gpio/gpio-rcar.c | 8 ++------
>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-rcar.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-rcar.c
> index 5a693dd..7fd09ef 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-rcar.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-rcar.c
> @@ -279,16 +279,13 @@ static struct irq_domain_ops gpio_rcar_irq_domain_ops = {
>   static void gpio_rcar_parse_pdata(struct gpio_rcar_priv *p)
>   {
>   	struct gpio_rcar_config *pdata = p->pdev->dev.platform_data;
> -#ifdef CONFIG_OF
>   	struct device_node *np = p->pdev->dev.of_node;
>   	struct of_phandle_args args;
>   	int ret;
> -#endif
>
> -	if (pdata)
> +	if (pdata) {
>   		p->config = *pdata;
> -#ifdef CONFIG_OF
> -	else if (np) {
> +	} else if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF) && np) {
>   		ret = of_parse_phandle_with_args(np, "gpio-ranges",
>   				"#gpio-range-cells", 0, &args);
>   		p->config.number_of_pins = ret == 0 && args.args_count == 3

WBR, Sergei

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 2/2] gpio-rcar: Remove #ifdef CONFIG_OF around OF-specific sections
  2013-06-17 19:19     ` Sergei Shtylyov
@ 2013-06-17 19:21       ` Laurent Pinchart
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Laurent Pinchart @ 2013-06-17 19:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel

On Monday 17 June 2013 23:19:07 Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> Hello.
> 
> On 06/17/2013 11:15 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > All functions and data types used by OF-specific code paths are declared
> > in <linux/of.h> regardless of CONFIG_OF. Replace the #ifdef CONFIG_OF
> > guard with a if(IS_SELECTED(CONFIG_OF)) and let the compiler optimize
> 
>     You're using IS_ENABLED() actually.

Oops. We should fix gcc to check the commit messages :-)

Simon, could you fix this while applying, or should I resubmit ?

> > the unused code away.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart
> > <laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com>
> > ---
> > 
> >   drivers/gpio/gpio-rcar.c | 8 ++------
> >   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-rcar.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-rcar.c
> > index 5a693dd..7fd09ef 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-rcar.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-rcar.c
> > @@ -279,16 +279,13 @@ static struct irq_domain_ops
> > gpio_rcar_irq_domain_ops = {> 
> >   static void gpio_rcar_parse_pdata(struct gpio_rcar_priv *p)
> >   {
> >   
> >   	struct gpio_rcar_config *pdata = p->pdev->dev.platform_data;
> > 
> > -#ifdef CONFIG_OF
> > 
> >   	struct device_node *np = p->pdev->dev.of_node;
> >   	struct of_phandle_args args;
> >   	int ret;
> > 
> > -#endif
> > 
> > -	if (pdata)
> > +	if (pdata) {
> > 
> >   		p->config = *pdata;
> > 
> > -#ifdef CONFIG_OF
> > -	else if (np) {
> > +	} else if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF) && np) {
> > 
> >   		ret = of_parse_phandle_with_args(np, "gpio-ranges",
> >   		
> >   				"#gpio-range-cells", 0, &args);
> >   		
> >   		p->config.number_of_pins = ret = 0 && args.args_count = 3

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 2/2] gpio-rcar: Remove #ifdef CONFIG_OF around OF-specific sections
@ 2013-06-17 19:21       ` Laurent Pinchart
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Laurent Pinchart @ 2013-06-17 19:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel

On Monday 17 June 2013 23:19:07 Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> Hello.
> 
> On 06/17/2013 11:15 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > All functions and data types used by OF-specific code paths are declared
> > in <linux/of.h> regardless of CONFIG_OF. Replace the #ifdef CONFIG_OF
> > guard with a if(IS_SELECTED(CONFIG_OF)) and let the compiler optimize
> 
>     You're using IS_ENABLED() actually.

Oops. We should fix gcc to check the commit messages :-)

Simon, could you fix this while applying, or should I resubmit ?

> > the unused code away.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart
> > <laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com>
> > ---
> > 
> >   drivers/gpio/gpio-rcar.c | 8 ++------
> >   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-rcar.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-rcar.c
> > index 5a693dd..7fd09ef 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-rcar.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-rcar.c
> > @@ -279,16 +279,13 @@ static struct irq_domain_ops
> > gpio_rcar_irq_domain_ops = {> 
> >   static void gpio_rcar_parse_pdata(struct gpio_rcar_priv *p)
> >   {
> >   
> >   	struct gpio_rcar_config *pdata = p->pdev->dev.platform_data;
> > 
> > -#ifdef CONFIG_OF
> > 
> >   	struct device_node *np = p->pdev->dev.of_node;
> >   	struct of_phandle_args args;
> >   	int ret;
> > 
> > -#endif
> > 
> > -	if (pdata)
> > +	if (pdata) {
> > 
> >   		p->config = *pdata;
> > 
> > -#ifdef CONFIG_OF
> > -	else if (np) {
> > +	} else if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF) && np) {
> > 
> >   		ret = of_parse_phandle_with_args(np, "gpio-ranges",
> >   		
> >   				"#gpio-range-cells", 0, &args);
> >   		
> >   		p->config.number_of_pins = ret == 0 && args.args_count == 3

-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 2/2] gpio-rcar: Remove #ifdef CONFIG_OF around OF-specific sections
  2013-06-17 19:21       ` Laurent Pinchart
@ 2013-06-18  8:02         ` Simon Horman
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Simon Horman @ 2013-06-18  8:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel

On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 09:21:08PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> On Monday 17 June 2013 23:19:07 Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> > Hello.
> > 
> > On 06/17/2013 11:15 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > > All functions and data types used by OF-specific code paths are declared
> > > in <linux/of.h> regardless of CONFIG_OF. Replace the #ifdef CONFIG_OF
> > > guard with a if(IS_SELECTED(CONFIG_OF)) and let the compiler optimize
> > 
> >     You're using IS_ENABLED() actually.
> 
> Oops. We should fix gcc to check the commit messages :-)
> 
> Simon, could you fix this while applying, or should I resubmit ?

Please re-spin, thanks.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 2/2] gpio-rcar: Remove #ifdef CONFIG_OF around OF-specific sections
@ 2013-06-18  8:02         ` Simon Horman
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Simon Horman @ 2013-06-18  8:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel

On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 09:21:08PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> On Monday 17 June 2013 23:19:07 Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> > Hello.
> > 
> > On 06/17/2013 11:15 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > > All functions and data types used by OF-specific code paths are declared
> > > in <linux/of.h> regardless of CONFIG_OF. Replace the #ifdef CONFIG_OF
> > > guard with a if(IS_SELECTED(CONFIG_OF)) and let the compiler optimize
> > 
> >     You're using IS_ENABLED() actually.
> 
> Oops. We should fix gcc to check the commit messages :-)
> 
> Simon, could you fix this while applying, or should I resubmit ?

Please re-spin, thanks.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 1/2] gpio-rcar: Reference core gpio documentation in the DT bindings
  2013-06-17 19:15   ` Laurent Pinchart
@ 2013-06-19 19:16     ` Linus Walleij
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Linus Walleij @ 2013-06-19 19:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel

On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 9:15 PM, Laurent Pinchart
<laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com> wrote:

> Replaced the detailed gpio-ranges documentation with a reference to the
> code gpio DT bindings, and mention the gpio flags symbolic names.
>
> Cc: devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org
> Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com>

Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

Yours,
Linus Walleij

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 1/2] gpio-rcar: Reference core gpio documentation in the DT bindings
@ 2013-06-19 19:16     ` Linus Walleij
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Linus Walleij @ 2013-06-19 19:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel

On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 9:15 PM, Laurent Pinchart
<laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com> wrote:

> Replaced the detailed gpio-ranges documentation with a reference to the
> code gpio DT bindings, and mention the gpio flags symbolic names.
>
> Cc: devicetree-discuss at lists.ozlabs.org
> Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com>

Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

Yours,
Linus Walleij

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2013-06-19 19:16 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-06-17 19:15 [PATCH 0/2] R-Car GPIO fixes Laurent Pinchart
2013-06-17 19:15 ` Laurent Pinchart
2013-06-17 19:15 ` [PATCH 1/2] gpio-rcar: Reference core gpio documentation in the DT bindings Laurent Pinchart
2013-06-17 19:15   ` Laurent Pinchart
2013-06-19 19:16   ` Linus Walleij
2013-06-19 19:16     ` Linus Walleij
2013-06-17 19:15 ` [PATCH 2/2] gpio-rcar: Remove #ifdef CONFIG_OF around OF-specific sections Laurent Pinchart
2013-06-17 19:15   ` Laurent Pinchart
2013-06-17 19:19   ` Sergei Shtylyov
2013-06-17 19:19     ` Sergei Shtylyov
2013-06-17 19:21     ` Laurent Pinchart
2013-06-17 19:21       ` Laurent Pinchart
2013-06-18  8:02       ` Simon Horman
2013-06-18  8:02         ` Simon Horman

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.