All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha@arm.com
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cpufreq@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org
Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>,
	Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>,
	Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>,
	Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
	Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Sudeep KarkadaNagesha <sudeep.karkadanagesha@arm.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH v2 01/15] of: add support for retrieving cpu node for a given logical cpu index
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2013 15:06:10 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1374069984-20567-2-git-send-email-Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1374069984-20567-1-git-send-email-Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha@arm.com>

From: Sudeep KarkadaNagesha <sudeep.karkadanagesha@arm.com>

Currently different drivers requiring to access cpu device node are
parsing the device tree themselves. Since the ordering in the DT need
not match the logical cpu ordering, the parsing logic needs to consider
that. However, this has resulted in lots of code duplication and in some
cases even incorrect logic.

It's better to consolidate them by adding support for getting cpu
device node for a given logical cpu index in DT core library. However
logical to physical index mapping can be architecture specific.

This patch adds of_get_cpu_node to retrieve a cpu device node for a
given logical cpu index. The default matching of the physical id to the
logical cpu index can be overridden by architecture specific code.

It is recommended to use these helper function only in pre-SMP/early
initialisation stages to retrieve CPU device node pointers in logical
ordering. Once the cpu devices are registered, it can be retrieved easily
from cpu device of_node which avoids unnecessary parsing and matching.

Cc: Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep KarkadaNagesha <sudeep.karkadanagesha@arm.com>
---
 drivers/of/base.c  | 66 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 include/linux/of.h |  5 +++++
 2 files changed, 71 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/of/base.c b/drivers/of/base.c
index 5c54279..363b8f9 100644
--- a/drivers/of/base.c
+++ b/drivers/of/base.c
@@ -230,6 +230,72 @@ const void *of_get_property(const struct device_node *np, const char *name,
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(of_get_property);
 
+/*
+ * arch_match_cpu_phys_id - Match the given logical CPU and physical id
+ *
+ * @cpu: logical index of a cpu
+ * @phys_id: physical identifier of a cpu
+ *
+ * CPU logical to physical index mapping is architecure specific.
+ * However this __weak function provides a default match of physical
+ * id to logical cpu index.
+ *
+ * Returns 1 if the physical identifier and the logical index correspond
+ * to the same cpu, 0 otherwise.
+ */
+int __weak arch_match_cpu_phys_id(int cpu, u64 phys_id)
+{
+	return (u32)phys_id == cpu;
+}
+
+/**
+ * of_get_cpu_node - Get device node associated with the given logical CPU
+ *
+ * @cpu: CPU number(logical index) for which device node is required
+ *
+ * The main purpose of this function is to retrieve the device node for the
+ * given logical CPU index. It should be used to intialise the of_node in
+ * cpu device. Once of_node in cpu device is populated, all the further
+ * references can use that instead.
+ *
+ * CPU logical to physical index mapping is architecure specific and is built
+ * before booting secondary cores. This function uses arch_match_cpu_phys_id
+ * which can be overridden by architecture specific implementation.
+ *
+ * Returns a node pointer for the logical cpu if found, else NULL.
+ */
+struct device_node *of_get_cpu_node(int cpu)
+{
+	struct device_node *cpun, *cpus;
+	const u32 *cell;
+	u64 hwid;
+	int ac, prop_len;
+
+	cpus = of_find_node_by_path("/cpus");
+	if (WARN(!cpus, "Missing cpus node, bailing out\n"))
+		return NULL;
+
+	if (WARN_ON(of_property_read_u32(cpus, "#address-cells", &ac)))
+		ac = of_n_addr_cells(cpus);
+
+	for_each_child_of_node(cpus, cpun) {
+		if (of_node_cmp(cpun->type, "cpu"))
+			continue;
+		cell = of_get_property(cpun, "reg", &prop_len);
+		if (WARN(!cell, "%s: missing reg property\n", cpun->full_name))
+			continue;
+
+		while (prop_len) {
+			hwid = of_read_number(cell, ac);
+			prop_len -= ac;
+			if (arch_match_cpu_phys_id(cpu, hwid))
+				return cpun;
+		}
+	}
+
+	return NULL;
+}
+
 /** Checks if the given "compat" string matches one of the strings in
  * the device's "compatible" property
  */
diff --git a/include/linux/of.h b/include/linux/of.h
index 1fd08ca..150b48e 100644
--- a/include/linux/of.h
+++ b/include/linux/of.h
@@ -266,6 +266,7 @@ extern int of_device_is_available(const struct device_node *device);
 extern const void *of_get_property(const struct device_node *node,
 				const char *name,
 				int *lenp);
+extern struct device_node *of_get_cpu_node(int cpu);
 #define for_each_property_of_node(dn, pp) \
 	for (pp = dn->properties; pp != NULL; pp = pp->next)
 
@@ -458,6 +459,10 @@ static inline const void *of_get_property(const struct device_node *node,
 {
 	return NULL;
 }
+static inline struct device_node *of_get_cpu_node(int cpu)
+{
+	return NULL;
+}
 
 static inline int of_property_read_u64(const struct device_node *np,
 				       const char *propname, u64 *out_value)
-- 
1.8.1.2



WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org
To: linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org,
	linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	cpufreq-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	linux-pm-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org
Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi
	<lorenzo.pieralisi-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>,
	Russell King <linux-lFZ/pmaqli7XmaaqVzeoHQ@public.gmane.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman
	<gregkh-hQyY1W1yCW8ekmWlsbkhG0B+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>,
	Rob Herring <rob.herring-bsGFqQB8/DxBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw-KKrjLPT3xs0@public.gmane.org>,
	Grant Likely
	<grant.likely-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
	Viresh Kumar
	<viresh.kumar-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
Subject: [RFC PATCH v2 01/15] of: add support for retrieving cpu node for a given logical cpu index
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2013 15:06:10 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1374069984-20567-2-git-send-email-Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1374069984-20567-1-git-send-email-Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>

From: Sudeep KarkadaNagesha <sudeep.karkadanagesha-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>

Currently different drivers requiring to access cpu device node are
parsing the device tree themselves. Since the ordering in the DT need
not match the logical cpu ordering, the parsing logic needs to consider
that. However, this has resulted in lots of code duplication and in some
cases even incorrect logic.

It's better to consolidate them by adding support for getting cpu
device node for a given logical cpu index in DT core library. However
logical to physical index mapping can be architecture specific.

This patch adds of_get_cpu_node to retrieve a cpu device node for a
given logical cpu index. The default matching of the physical id to the
logical cpu index can be overridden by architecture specific code.

It is recommended to use these helper function only in pre-SMP/early
initialisation stages to retrieve CPU device node pointers in logical
ordering. Once the cpu devices are registered, it can be retrieved easily
from cpu device of_node which avoids unnecessary parsing and matching.

Cc: Rob Herring <rob.herring-bsGFqQB8/DxBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep KarkadaNagesha <sudeep.karkadanagesha-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
---
 drivers/of/base.c  | 66 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 include/linux/of.h |  5 +++++
 2 files changed, 71 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/of/base.c b/drivers/of/base.c
index 5c54279..363b8f9 100644
--- a/drivers/of/base.c
+++ b/drivers/of/base.c
@@ -230,6 +230,72 @@ const void *of_get_property(const struct device_node *np, const char *name,
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(of_get_property);
 
+/*
+ * arch_match_cpu_phys_id - Match the given logical CPU and physical id
+ *
+ * @cpu: logical index of a cpu
+ * @phys_id: physical identifier of a cpu
+ *
+ * CPU logical to physical index mapping is architecure specific.
+ * However this __weak function provides a default match of physical
+ * id to logical cpu index.
+ *
+ * Returns 1 if the physical identifier and the logical index correspond
+ * to the same cpu, 0 otherwise.
+ */
+int __weak arch_match_cpu_phys_id(int cpu, u64 phys_id)
+{
+	return (u32)phys_id == cpu;
+}
+
+/**
+ * of_get_cpu_node - Get device node associated with the given logical CPU
+ *
+ * @cpu: CPU number(logical index) for which device node is required
+ *
+ * The main purpose of this function is to retrieve the device node for the
+ * given logical CPU index. It should be used to intialise the of_node in
+ * cpu device. Once of_node in cpu device is populated, all the further
+ * references can use that instead.
+ *
+ * CPU logical to physical index mapping is architecure specific and is built
+ * before booting secondary cores. This function uses arch_match_cpu_phys_id
+ * which can be overridden by architecture specific implementation.
+ *
+ * Returns a node pointer for the logical cpu if found, else NULL.
+ */
+struct device_node *of_get_cpu_node(int cpu)
+{
+	struct device_node *cpun, *cpus;
+	const u32 *cell;
+	u64 hwid;
+	int ac, prop_len;
+
+	cpus = of_find_node_by_path("/cpus");
+	if (WARN(!cpus, "Missing cpus node, bailing out\n"))
+		return NULL;
+
+	if (WARN_ON(of_property_read_u32(cpus, "#address-cells", &ac)))
+		ac = of_n_addr_cells(cpus);
+
+	for_each_child_of_node(cpus, cpun) {
+		if (of_node_cmp(cpun->type, "cpu"))
+			continue;
+		cell = of_get_property(cpun, "reg", &prop_len);
+		if (WARN(!cell, "%s: missing reg property\n", cpun->full_name))
+			continue;
+
+		while (prop_len) {
+			hwid = of_read_number(cell, ac);
+			prop_len -= ac;
+			if (arch_match_cpu_phys_id(cpu, hwid))
+				return cpun;
+		}
+	}
+
+	return NULL;
+}
+
 /** Checks if the given "compat" string matches one of the strings in
  * the device's "compatible" property
  */
diff --git a/include/linux/of.h b/include/linux/of.h
index 1fd08ca..150b48e 100644
--- a/include/linux/of.h
+++ b/include/linux/of.h
@@ -266,6 +266,7 @@ extern int of_device_is_available(const struct device_node *device);
 extern const void *of_get_property(const struct device_node *node,
 				const char *name,
 				int *lenp);
+extern struct device_node *of_get_cpu_node(int cpu);
 #define for_each_property_of_node(dn, pp) \
 	for (pp = dn->properties; pp != NULL; pp = pp->next)
 
@@ -458,6 +459,10 @@ static inline const void *of_get_property(const struct device_node *node,
 {
 	return NULL;
 }
+static inline struct device_node *of_get_cpu_node(int cpu)
+{
+	return NULL;
+}
 
 static inline int of_property_read_u64(const struct device_node *np,
 				       const char *propname, u64 *out_value)
-- 
1.8.1.2

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha@arm.com (Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha at arm.com)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH v2 01/15] of: add support for retrieving cpu node for a given logical cpu index
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2013 15:06:10 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1374069984-20567-2-git-send-email-Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1374069984-20567-1-git-send-email-Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha@arm.com>

From: Sudeep KarkadaNagesha <sudeep.karkadanagesha@arm.com>

Currently different drivers requiring to access cpu device node are
parsing the device tree themselves. Since the ordering in the DT need
not match the logical cpu ordering, the parsing logic needs to consider
that. However, this has resulted in lots of code duplication and in some
cases even incorrect logic.

It's better to consolidate them by adding support for getting cpu
device node for a given logical cpu index in DT core library. However
logical to physical index mapping can be architecture specific.

This patch adds of_get_cpu_node to retrieve a cpu device node for a
given logical cpu index. The default matching of the physical id to the
logical cpu index can be overridden by architecture specific code.

It is recommended to use these helper function only in pre-SMP/early
initialisation stages to retrieve CPU device node pointers in logical
ordering. Once the cpu devices are registered, it can be retrieved easily
from cpu device of_node which avoids unnecessary parsing and matching.

Cc: Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep KarkadaNagesha <sudeep.karkadanagesha@arm.com>
---
 drivers/of/base.c  | 66 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 include/linux/of.h |  5 +++++
 2 files changed, 71 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/of/base.c b/drivers/of/base.c
index 5c54279..363b8f9 100644
--- a/drivers/of/base.c
+++ b/drivers/of/base.c
@@ -230,6 +230,72 @@ const void *of_get_property(const struct device_node *np, const char *name,
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(of_get_property);
 
+/*
+ * arch_match_cpu_phys_id - Match the given logical CPU and physical id
+ *
+ * @cpu: logical index of a cpu
+ * @phys_id: physical identifier of a cpu
+ *
+ * CPU logical to physical index mapping is architecure specific.
+ * However this __weak function provides a default match of physical
+ * id to logical cpu index.
+ *
+ * Returns 1 if the physical identifier and the logical index correspond
+ * to the same cpu, 0 otherwise.
+ */
+int __weak arch_match_cpu_phys_id(int cpu, u64 phys_id)
+{
+	return (u32)phys_id == cpu;
+}
+
+/**
+ * of_get_cpu_node - Get device node associated with the given logical CPU
+ *
+ * @cpu: CPU number(logical index) for which device node is required
+ *
+ * The main purpose of this function is to retrieve the device node for the
+ * given logical CPU index. It should be used to intialise the of_node in
+ * cpu device. Once of_node in cpu device is populated, all the further
+ * references can use that instead.
+ *
+ * CPU logical to physical index mapping is architecure specific and is built
+ * before booting secondary cores. This function uses arch_match_cpu_phys_id
+ * which can be overridden by architecture specific implementation.
+ *
+ * Returns a node pointer for the logical cpu if found, else NULL.
+ */
+struct device_node *of_get_cpu_node(int cpu)
+{
+	struct device_node *cpun, *cpus;
+	const u32 *cell;
+	u64 hwid;
+	int ac, prop_len;
+
+	cpus = of_find_node_by_path("/cpus");
+	if (WARN(!cpus, "Missing cpus node, bailing out\n"))
+		return NULL;
+
+	if (WARN_ON(of_property_read_u32(cpus, "#address-cells", &ac)))
+		ac = of_n_addr_cells(cpus);
+
+	for_each_child_of_node(cpus, cpun) {
+		if (of_node_cmp(cpun->type, "cpu"))
+			continue;
+		cell = of_get_property(cpun, "reg", &prop_len);
+		if (WARN(!cell, "%s: missing reg property\n", cpun->full_name))
+			continue;
+
+		while (prop_len) {
+			hwid = of_read_number(cell, ac);
+			prop_len -= ac;
+			if (arch_match_cpu_phys_id(cpu, hwid))
+				return cpun;
+		}
+	}
+
+	return NULL;
+}
+
 /** Checks if the given "compat" string matches one of the strings in
  * the device's "compatible" property
  */
diff --git a/include/linux/of.h b/include/linux/of.h
index 1fd08ca..150b48e 100644
--- a/include/linux/of.h
+++ b/include/linux/of.h
@@ -266,6 +266,7 @@ extern int of_device_is_available(const struct device_node *device);
 extern const void *of_get_property(const struct device_node *node,
 				const char *name,
 				int *lenp);
+extern struct device_node *of_get_cpu_node(int cpu);
 #define for_each_property_of_node(dn, pp) \
 	for (pp = dn->properties; pp != NULL; pp = pp->next)
 
@@ -458,6 +459,10 @@ static inline const void *of_get_property(const struct device_node *node,
 {
 	return NULL;
 }
+static inline struct device_node *of_get_cpu_node(int cpu)
+{
+	return NULL;
+}
 
 static inline int of_property_read_u64(const struct device_node *np,
 				       const char *propname, u64 *out_value)
-- 
1.8.1.2

  reply	other threads:[~2013-07-17 14:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 379+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-07-17 14:06 [RFC PATCH v2 00/15] DT/core: update cpu device of_node Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha
2013-07-17 14:06 ` Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha at arm.com
2013-07-17 14:06 ` Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha [this message]
2013-07-17 14:06   ` [RFC PATCH v2 01/15] of: add support for retrieving cpu node for a given logical cpu index Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha at arm.com
2013-07-17 14:06   ` Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha-5wv7dgnIgG8
2013-07-17 14:30   ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-07-17 14:30     ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-07-17 14:30     ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-07-17 14:50   ` Rob Herring
2013-07-17 14:50     ` Rob Herring
2013-07-17 15:18     ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-07-17 15:18       ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-07-17 15:18       ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-07-17 14:06 ` [RFC PATCH v2 02/15] driver/core: cpu: initialize of_node in cpu's device struture Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha
2013-07-17 14:06   ` Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha at arm.com
2013-07-17 14:06 ` [RFC PATCH v2 03/15] ARM: DT/kernel: define ARM specific arch_match_cpu_phys_id Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha
2013-07-17 14:06   ` Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha at arm.com
2013-07-17 14:06 ` [RFC PATCH v2 04/15] ARM: topology: remove hwid/MPIDR dependency from cpu_capacity Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha
2013-07-17 14:06   ` Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha at arm.com
2013-07-17 14:06   ` Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha-5wv7dgnIgG8
2013-07-17 14:06 ` [RFC PATCH v2 05/15] ARM: mvebu: remove device tree parsing for cpu nodes Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha
2013-07-17 14:06   ` Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha at arm.com
2013-07-17 14:06   ` Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha-5wv7dgnIgG8
2013-07-17 14:06 ` [RFC PATCH v2 06/15] drivers/bus: arm-cci: avoid parsing DT for cpu device nodes Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha
2013-07-17 14:06   ` Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha at arm.com
2013-07-17 14:06   ` Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha
2013-07-17 14:06 ` [RFC PATCH v2 07/15] cpufreq: imx6q-cpufreq: remove device tree parsing for cpu nodes Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha
2013-07-17 14:06   ` Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha at arm.com
2013-07-17 14:06   ` Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha-5wv7dgnIgG8
2013-07-17 14:06 ` [RFC PATCH v2 08/15] cpufreq: cpufreq-cpu0: " Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha
2013-07-17 14:06   ` Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha at arm.com
2013-07-17 14:06   ` Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha-5wv7dgnIgG8
2013-07-17 14:06 ` [RFC PATCH v2 09/15] cpufreq: highbank-cpufreq: " Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha
2013-07-17 14:06   ` Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha at arm.com
2013-07-17 14:06 ` [RFC PATCH v2 10/15] cpufreq: spear-cpufreq: " Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha
2013-07-17 14:06   ` Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha at arm.com
2013-07-17 14:06 ` [RFC PATCH v2 11/15] cpufreq: kirkwood-cpufreq: " Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha
2013-07-17 14:06   ` Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha at arm.com
2013-07-17 14:43   ` Andrew Lunn
2013-07-17 14:43     ` Andrew Lunn
2013-07-18  7:53     ` Viresh Kumar
2013-07-18  7:53       ` Viresh Kumar
2013-07-18  8:24     ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-07-18  8:24       ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-07-18  8:24       ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-07-18 10:14       ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-07-18 10:14         ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-07-18 10:14         ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-07-18 18:30         ` Rob Herring
2013-07-18 18:30           ` Rob Herring
2013-07-18 18:30           ` Rob Herring
2013-07-17 14:06 ` [RFC PATCH v2 12/15] cpufreq: arm_big_little: " Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha
2013-07-17 14:06   ` Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha at arm.com
2013-07-17 14:06 ` [RFC PATCH v2 13/15] cpufreq: maple-cpufreq: " Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha
2013-07-17 14:06   ` Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha at arm.com
2013-07-17 14:06 ` [RFC PATCH v2 14/15] cpufreq: pmac64-cpufreq: " Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha
2013-07-17 14:06   ` Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha at arm.com
2013-07-17 14:06 ` [RFC PATCH v2 15/15] cpufreq: pmac32-cpufreq: " Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha
2013-07-17 14:06   ` Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha at arm.com
2013-07-18  7:54 ` [RFC PATCH v2 00/15] DT/core: update cpu device of_node Viresh Kumar
2013-07-18  7:54   ` Viresh Kumar
2013-07-22 11:32 ` [PATCH v3 00/16] " Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-07-22 11:32   ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-07-22 11:32   ` [PATCH v3 01/16] of: add support for retrieving cpu node for a given logical cpu index Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-07-22 11:32     ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-07-22 14:14     ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-07-22 14:14       ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-07-22 15:07       ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-07-22 15:07         ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-07-22 15:07         ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-07-23 10:54         ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-07-23 10:54           ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-15 11:32     ` Tomasz Figa
2013-08-15 11:32       ` Tomasz Figa
2013-08-15 14:59       ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-15 14:59         ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-15 14:59         ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-07-22 11:32   ` [PATCH v3 02/16] ARM: DT/kernel: define ARM specific arch_match_cpu_phys_id Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-07-22 11:32     ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-07-22 14:14     ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-07-22 14:14       ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-07-22 11:32   ` [PATCH v3 03/16] driver/core: cpu: initialize of_node in cpu's device struture Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-07-22 11:32     ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-15 11:35     ` Tomasz Figa
2013-08-15 11:35       ` Tomasz Figa
2013-08-15 15:13       ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-15 15:13         ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-15 15:13         ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-07-22 11:32   ` [PATCH v3 04/16] ARM: topology: remove hwid/MPIDR dependency from cpu_capacity Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-07-22 11:32     ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-07-22 11:32     ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-07-22 14:25     ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-07-22 14:25       ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-07-22 11:32   ` [PATCH v3 05/16] ARM: mvebu: remove device tree parsing for cpu nodes Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-07-22 11:32     ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-01  9:54     ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-01  9:54       ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-01  9:54       ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-01 12:02       ` Jason Cooper
2013-08-01 12:02         ` Jason Cooper
2013-08-01 12:02         ` Jason Cooper
2013-08-05 16:28         ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-05 16:28           ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-05 16:28           ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-06  8:25           ` Gregory CLEMENT
2013-08-06  8:25             ` Gregory CLEMENT
2013-08-06  8:25             ` Gregory CLEMENT
2013-08-06  9:02             ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-06  9:02               ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-06  9:02               ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-07-22 11:32   ` [PATCH v3 06/16] drivers/bus: arm-cci: avoid parsing DT for cpu device nodes Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-07-22 11:32     ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-07-22 14:37     ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-07-22 14:37       ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-07-22 11:32   ` [PATCH v3 07/16] of/device: add helper to get cpu device node from logical cpu index Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-07-22 11:32     ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-07-22 11:32     ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-07-26 17:01     ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-07-26 17:01       ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-07-26 17:01       ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-07-26 18:55       ` Rob Herring
2013-07-26 18:55         ` Rob Herring
2013-07-26 18:55         ` Rob Herring
2013-07-22 11:32   ` [PATCH v3 08/16] cpufreq: imx6q-cpufreq: remove device tree parsing for cpu nodes Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-07-22 11:32     ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-07-22 11:32   ` [PATCH v3 09/16] cpufreq: cpufreq-cpu0: " Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-07-22 11:32     ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-07-22 11:32   ` [PATCH v3 10/16] cpufreq: highbank-cpufreq: " Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-07-22 11:32     ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-07-22 11:32   ` [PATCH v3 11/16] cpufreq: spear-cpufreq: " Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-07-22 11:32     ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-07-22 11:32   ` [PATCH v3 12/16] cpufreq: kirkwood-cpufreq: " Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-07-22 11:32     ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-07-23  9:25     ` Andrew Lunn
2013-07-23  9:25       ` Andrew Lunn
2013-07-22 11:32   ` [PATCH v3 13/16] cpufreq: arm_big_little: " Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-07-22 11:32     ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-07-22 11:32   ` [PATCH v3 14/16] cpufreq: maple-cpufreq: " Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-07-22 11:32     ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-07-22 11:32   ` [PATCH v3 15/16] cpufreq: pmac64-cpufreq: " Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-07-22 11:32     ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-07-22 11:32   ` [PATCH v3 16/16] cpufreq: pmac32-cpufreq: " Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-07-22 11:32     ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-01 10:05   ` [PATCH v3 00/16] DT/core: update cpu device of_node Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-01 10:05     ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-01 10:05     ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-15 17:09   ` [RFC PATCH 0/4] DT: move of_get_cpu_node from PPC to DT core Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-15 17:09     ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-15 17:09     ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-15 17:09     ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-15 17:09     ` [RFC PATCH 1/4] microblaze: remove undefined of_get_cpu_node declaration Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-15 17:09       ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-15 17:09       ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-15 17:09       ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-15 17:09     ` [RFC PATCH 2/4] openrisc: " Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-15 17:09       ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-15 17:09       ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-15 17:09       ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-16  9:41       ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-16  9:41         ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-16  9:41         ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-16  9:41         ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-21  5:10         ` Jonas Bonn
2013-08-21  5:10           ` Jonas Bonn
2013-08-21  5:10           ` Jonas Bonn
2013-08-21  5:10           ` Jonas Bonn
2013-08-15 17:09     ` [RFC PATCH 3/4] powerpc: refactor of_get_cpu_node to support other architectures Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-15 17:09       ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-15 17:09       ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-15 17:09       ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-16  4:49       ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-08-16  4:49         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-08-16  4:49         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-08-16  8:48         ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-16  8:48           ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-16  8:48           ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-16  8:48           ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-16 12:32           ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-08-16 12:32             ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-08-16 12:32             ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-08-16 12:44             ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-16 12:44               ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-16 12:44               ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-16 12:44               ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-16  4:50       ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-08-16  4:50         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-08-16  4:50         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-08-16  8:43         ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-16  8:43           ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-16  8:43           ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-16  8:43           ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-15 17:09     ` [RFC PATCH 4/4] of: move of_get_cpu_node implementation to DT core library Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-15 17:09       ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-15 17:09       ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-15 17:09       ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-16 17:39     ` [RFC PATCH v2 0/4] DT: move of_get_cpu_node from PPC to DT core Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-16 17:39       ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-16 17:39       ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-16 17:39       ` [RFC PATCH v2 3/4] powerpc: refactor of_get_cpu_node to support other architectures Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-16 17:39         ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-16 17:39         ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-16 22:13         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-08-16 22:13           ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-08-16 22:13           ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-08-19 10:13           ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-19 10:13             ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-19 10:13             ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-19 10:13             ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-17 10:50         ` Tomasz Figa
2013-08-17 10:50           ` Tomasz Figa
2013-08-17 10:50           ` Tomasz Figa
2013-08-17 22:09           ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-08-17 22:09             ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-08-17 22:09             ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-08-17 22:22             ` Tomasz Figa
2013-08-17 22:22               ` Tomasz Figa
2013-08-17 22:22               ` Tomasz Figa
2013-08-19 10:19             ` Mark Rutland
2013-08-19 10:19               ` Mark Rutland
2013-08-19 10:19               ` Mark Rutland
2013-08-19 13:02               ` Rob Herring
2013-08-19 13:02                 ` Rob Herring
2013-08-19 13:02                 ` Rob Herring
2013-08-19 13:02                 ` Rob Herring
2013-08-19 13:56                 ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-19 13:56                   ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-19 13:56                   ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-19 13:56                   ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-22 13:59                   ` Mark Rutland
2013-08-22 13:59                     ` Mark Rutland
2013-08-22 13:59                     ` Mark Rutland
2013-08-22 13:59                     ` Mark Rutland
2013-08-22 16:51                     ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-22 16:51                       ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-22 16:51                       ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-22 16:51                       ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-28 19:46                     ` Grant Likely
2013-08-28 19:46                       ` Grant Likely
2013-08-28 19:46                       ` Grant Likely
2013-08-28 19:46                       ` Grant Likely
2013-08-29  9:50                       ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2013-08-29  9:50                         ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2013-08-29  9:50                         ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2013-08-29  9:50                         ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2013-08-16 17:39       ` [RFC PATCH v2 4/4] of: move of_get_cpu_node implementation to DT core library Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-16 17:39         ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-16 17:39         ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-16 22:14         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-08-16 22:14           ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-08-16 22:14           ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-08-19 10:21           ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-19 10:21             ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-19 10:21             ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-19 10:21             ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-19 13:11         ` Rob Herring
2013-08-19 13:11           ` Rob Herring
2013-08-19 13:11           ` Rob Herring
2013-08-19 13:24           ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-19 13:24             ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-19 13:24             ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-19 13:24             ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-20  9:30   ` [PATCH v4 00/19] DT/core: update cpu device of_node Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-20  9:30     ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-20  9:30     ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-20  9:30     ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-20  9:30     ` [PATCH v4 01/19] microblaze: remove undefined of_get_cpu_node declaration Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-20  9:30       ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-20  9:30       ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-20  9:30       ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-20  9:30     ` [PATCH v4 02/19] openrisc: " Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-20  9:30       ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-20  9:30       ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-20  9:30       ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-20  9:30     ` [PATCH v4 03/19] powerpc: refactor of_get_cpu_node to support other architectures Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-20  9:30       ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-20  9:30       ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-20  9:30       ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-20 12:27       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-08-20 12:27         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-08-20 12:27         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-08-20 12:22         ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-20 12:22           ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-20 12:22           ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-20 12:22           ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-20 21:48           ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-08-20 21:48             ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-08-20 21:48             ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-08-22  6:15       ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-08-22  6:15         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-08-22  6:15         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2013-08-22 13:29         ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-22 13:29           ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-22 13:29           ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-22 13:29           ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-20  9:30     ` [PATCH v4 04/19] of: move of_get_cpu_node implementation to DT core library Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-20  9:30       ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-20  9:30       ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-20  9:30       ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-20  9:30     ` [PATCH v4 05/19] ARM: DT/kernel: define ARM specific arch_match_cpu_phys_id Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-20  9:30       ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-20  9:30       ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-20  9:30       ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-20  9:30     ` [PATCH v4 06/19] driver/core: cpu: initialize of_node in cpu's device struture Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-20  9:30       ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-20  9:30       ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-20  9:30       ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-20 12:28       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-08-20 12:28         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-08-20 12:28         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-08-20 15:18       ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2013-08-20 15:18         ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2013-08-20 15:18         ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2013-08-20  9:30     ` [PATCH v4 07/19] of/device: add helper to get cpu device node from logical cpu index Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-20  9:30       ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-20  9:30       ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-20  9:30       ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-20  9:30     ` [PATCH v4 08/19] ARM: topology: remove hwid/MPIDR dependency from cpu_capacity Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-20  9:30       ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-20  9:30       ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-20  9:30     ` [PATCH v4 09/19] ARM: mvebu: remove device tree parsing for cpu nodes Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-20  9:30       ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-20  9:30       ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-20  9:30     ` [PATCH v4 10/19] drivers/bus: arm-cci: avoid parsing DT for cpu device nodes Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-20  9:30       ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-20  9:30       ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-20  9:30     ` [PATCH v4 11/19] cpufreq: imx6q-cpufreq: remove device tree parsing for cpu nodes Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-20  9:30       ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-20  9:30       ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-20  9:30     ` [PATCH v4 12/19] cpufreq: cpufreq-cpu0: " Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-20  9:30       ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-20  9:30       ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-09-06 13:44       ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2013-09-06 13:44         ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2013-09-06 13:44         ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2013-09-09  9:24         ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-09-09  9:24           ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-09-09  9:24           ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-09-09  9:24           ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-09-09 14:32           ` Shawn Guo
2013-09-09 14:32             ` Shawn Guo
2013-09-09 14:32             ` Shawn Guo
2013-09-09 14:32             ` Shawn Guo
2013-09-09 15:24             ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-09-09 15:24               ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-09-09 15:24               ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-09-09 15:24               ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-09-10  2:44               ` Shawn Guo
2013-09-10  2:44                 ` Shawn Guo
2013-09-10  2:44                 ` Shawn Guo
2013-09-10  2:44                 ` Shawn Guo
2013-09-10 10:56                 ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-09-10 10:56                   ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-09-10 10:56                   ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-09-10 10:56                   ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-09-10 11:19                   ` Shawn Guo
2013-09-10 11:19                     ` Shawn Guo
2013-09-10 11:19                     ` Shawn Guo
2013-09-10 11:19                     ` Shawn Guo
2013-08-20  9:30     ` [PATCH v4 13/19] cpufreq: highbank-cpufreq: " Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-20  9:30       ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-20  9:30       ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-20  9:30     ` [PATCH v4 14/19] cpufreq: spear-cpufreq: " Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-20  9:30       ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-20  9:30       ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-20  9:30     ` [PATCH v4 15/19] cpufreq: kirkwood-cpufreq: " Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-20  9:30       ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-20  9:30       ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-20  9:30     ` [PATCH v4 16/19] cpufreq: arm_big_little: " Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-20  9:30       ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-20  9:30       ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-20  9:30     ` [PATCH v4 17/19] cpufreq: maple-cpufreq: " Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-20  9:30       ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-20  9:30       ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-20  9:30     ` [PATCH v4 18/19] cpufreq: pmac64-cpufreq: " Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-20  9:30       ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-20  9:30       ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-20  9:30     ` [PATCH v4 19/19] cpufreq: pmac32-cpufreq: " Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-20  9:30       ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha
2013-08-20  9:30       ` Sudeep KarkadaNagesha

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1374069984-20567-2-git-send-email-Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha@arm.com \
    --to=sudeep.karkadanagesha@arm.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=cpufreq@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=grant.likely@linaro.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=gregory.clement@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=olof@lixom.net \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=rob.herring@calxeda.com \
    --cc=shawn.guo@linaro.org \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.