* [Printing-architecture] CUPS 'marker-low-levels' attribute question
@ 2014-02-24 17:34 Tim Waugh
2014-02-24 17:37 ` Michael Sweet
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Tim Waugh @ 2014-02-24 17:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: printing-architecture
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 319 bytes --]
Hello,
Does anyone know how 'marker-low-levels' should be reported for a
regular ink cartridge?
Should it be 0, to show that it's the minimum value and means 'empty'?
Or should it be, say, 10, to correspond with the point at which a
marker-supply-low-warning state will be triggered?
Thanks,
Tim.
*/
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 482 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [Printing-architecture] CUPS 'marker-low-levels' attribute question
2014-02-24 17:34 [Printing-architecture] CUPS 'marker-low-levels' attribute question Tim Waugh
@ 2014-02-24 17:37 ` Michael Sweet
2014-02-24 17:48 ` Tim Waugh
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Michael Sweet @ 2014-02-24 17:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tim Waugh; +Cc: printing-architecture
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1123 bytes --]
Tim,
The intent is that marker-low-levels is the point at which you report marker-supply-low-warning and marker-high-levels is the point at which you report marker-waste-almost-full-warning.
Put more simply, if the marker-levels value is outside the range reported by marker-low-levels and marker-high-levels, then you need to do (replace) something soon.
On Feb 24, 2014, at 12:34 PM, Tim Waugh <twaugh@redhat.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Does anyone know how 'marker-low-levels' should be reported for a
> regular ink cartridge?
>
> Should it be 0, to show that it's the minimum value and means 'empty'?
>
> Or should it be, say, 10, to correspond with the point at which a
> marker-supply-low-warning state will be triggered?
>
> Thanks,
> Tim.
> */
>
> _______________________________________________
> Printing-architecture mailing list
> Printing-architecture@lists.linux-foundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/printing-architecture
_________________________________________________________
Michael Sweet, Senior Printing System Engineer, PWG Chair
[-- Attachment #2: smime.p7s --]
[-- Type: application/pkcs7-signature, Size: 4881 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [Printing-architecture] CUPS 'marker-low-levels' attribute question
2014-02-24 17:37 ` Michael Sweet
@ 2014-02-24 17:48 ` Tim Waugh
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Tim Waugh @ 2014-02-24 17:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michael Sweet; +Cc: printing-architecture
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 466 bytes --]
On Mon, 2014-02-24 at 12:37 -0500, Michael Sweet wrote:
> The intent is that marker-low-levels is the point at which you report
> marker-supply-low-warning and marker-high-levels is the point at which
> you report marker-waste-almost-full-warning.
>
> Put more simply, if the marker-levels value is outside the range
> reported by marker-low-levels and marker-high-levels, then you need to
> do (replace) something soon.
Thanks, I see now.
Tim.
*/
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 482 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-02-24 17:48 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-02-24 17:34 [Printing-architecture] CUPS 'marker-low-levels' attribute question Tim Waugh
2014-02-24 17:37 ` Michael Sweet
2014-02-24 17:48 ` Tim Waugh
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.