From: pawel.moll@arm.com (Pawel Moll)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/6] ARM: integrator: multiplatform advancements
Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2014 16:19:54 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1394036394.4160.12.camel@hornet> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACRpkdYfbgi_PY_OJpifzaS9x1fgLhGir05VS7BAw4QT5ZGMmQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, 2014-02-24 at 09:37 +0000, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 2:47 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux
> <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 11:29:25AM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
> >> The *real* solution, one might argue is to convert the CLCD
> >> driver to DRM and add device tree bindings, but it appears that
> >> this is an orthogonal goal that has been attempted by other with
> >> mixed results.
> >
> > What mixed results? You know, I find it rather sick that people run
> > around trying to do this to a driver that I authored and maintain
> > without one comment to me about it. It sometimes feels like people
> > think I don't exist anymore.
>
> Sorry, I was referring to this driver for PL111:
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-arm-kernel&m=137477285809710&w=2
>
> So I take it that the PL111 is a totally different beast from
> PL110 except for the single digit difference in the name.
> Whereas PL180 and PL181 are essentially the same piece
> of hardware...
>
> Then there is this patch set for DT support for the CLCD which
> appears to be orthogonal:
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-arm-kernel&m=137968689722364&w=2
>
> Pawel, is this coming along?
Last week I was about to answer that this was my last word in the
subject ;-) but then I decided to give it another go, trying to address
the last - I think - controversial bit, being the pads property. Made it
much simpler and optional, so it should be in anybody's (namely the DRM
driver and bindings) way.
Will post in a second.
Pawel
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-03-05 16:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-14 10:29 [PATCH 0/6] ARM: integrator: multiplatform advancements Linus Walleij
2014-02-14 10:29 ` [PATCH 1/6] ARM: integrator: localize the lm.h header Linus Walleij
2014-02-14 10:29 ` [PATCH 2/6] ARM: integrator: localize the impd1.h header Linus Walleij
2014-02-14 10:29 ` [PATCH 3/6] ARM: integrator: merge platform.h to hardware.h Linus Walleij
2014-02-14 10:29 ` [PATCH 4/6] ARM: integrator: localize the hardware.h header Linus Walleij
2014-02-14 10:29 ` [PATCH 5/6] ARM: integrator: register sched_clock directly Linus Walleij
2014-02-14 10:29 ` [PATCH 6/6] RFC: ARM: integrator: get rid of <mach/memory.h> Linus Walleij
2014-02-14 12:02 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-02-14 13:47 ` [PATCH 0/6] ARM: integrator: multiplatform advancements Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-02-24 9:37 ` Linus Walleij
2014-03-05 16:19 ` Pawel Moll [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1394036394.4160.12.camel@hornet \
--to=pawel.moll@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.