* [PATCH net-next v4 0/3] ipv6: tcp_ipv6 policy route issue
@ 2014-03-28 4:01 Wangyufen
2014-03-28 4:01 ` [PATCH net-next v4 1/3] ipv6: tcp_ipv6 do some cleanup Wangyufen
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Wangyufen @ 2014-03-28 4:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: davem, netdev; +Cc: ioe, kuznet, Wang Yufen
From: Wang Yufen <wangyufen@huawei.com>
Wang Yufen (3):
ipv6: tcp_ipv6 do some cleanup
ipv6: reuse rt6_need_strict
ipv6: tcp_ipv6 policy route issue
v4: use rt6_need_strict to check whether the oif directly
assigned to iif
include/net/ip6_route.h | 1 +
net/ipv6/route.c | 2 +-
net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c | 42 +++---
3 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
--
1.7.12
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [PATCH net-next v4 1/3] ipv6: tcp_ipv6 do some cleanup
2014-03-28 4:01 [PATCH net-next v4 0/3] ipv6: tcp_ipv6 policy route issue Wangyufen
@ 2014-03-28 4:01 ` Wangyufen
2014-03-28 4:01 ` [PATCH net-next v4 2/3] ipv6: reuse rt6_need_strict Wangyufen
2014-03-28 4:01 ` [PATCH net-next v4 3/3] ipv6: tcp_ipv6 policy route issue Wangyufen
2 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Wangyufen @ 2014-03-28 4:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: davem, netdev; +Cc: ioe, kuznet, Wang Yufen
From: Wang Yufen <wangyufen@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Wang Yufen <wangyufen@huawei.com>
---
net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c | 24 +++++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c b/net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c
index 3277680..10b7c04 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c
@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@
#include <linux/ipsec.h>
#include <linux/times.h>
#include <linux/slab.h>
-
+#include <linux/uaccess.h>
#include <linux/ipv6.h>
#include <linux/icmpv6.h>
#include <linux/random.h>
@@ -65,8 +65,6 @@
#include <net/tcp_memcontrol.h>
#include <net/busy_poll.h>
-#include <asm/uaccess.h>
-
#include <linux/proc_fs.h>
#include <linux/seq_file.h>
@@ -532,8 +530,8 @@ static struct tcp_md5sig_key *tcp_v6_reqsk_md5_lookup(struct sock *sk,
return tcp_v6_md5_do_lookup(sk, &inet_rsk(req)->ir_v6_rmt_addr);
}
-static int tcp_v6_parse_md5_keys (struct sock *sk, char __user *optval,
- int optlen)
+static int tcp_v6_parse_md5_keys(struct sock *sk, char __user *optval,
+ int optlen)
{
struct tcp_md5sig cmd;
struct sockaddr_in6 *sin6 = (struct sockaddr_in6 *)&cmd.tcpm_addr;
@@ -717,7 +715,7 @@ struct request_sock_ops tcp6_request_sock_ops __read_mostly = {
.send_ack = tcp_v6_reqsk_send_ack,
.destructor = tcp_v6_reqsk_destructor,
.send_reset = tcp_v6_send_reset,
- .syn_ack_timeout = tcp_syn_ack_timeout,
+ .syn_ack_timeout = tcp_syn_ack_timeout,
};
#ifdef CONFIG_TCP_MD5SIG
@@ -1261,7 +1259,8 @@ static struct sock *tcp_v6_syn_recv_sock(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb,
#ifdef CONFIG_TCP_MD5SIG
/* Copy over the MD5 key from the original socket */
- if ((key = tcp_v6_md5_do_lookup(sk, &newsk->sk_v6_daddr)) != NULL) {
+ key = tcp_v6_md5_do_lookup(sk, &newsk->sk_v6_daddr);
+ if (key != NULL) {
/* We're using one, so create a matching key
* on the newsk structure. If we fail to get
* memory, then we end up not copying the key
@@ -1305,9 +1304,8 @@ static __sum16 tcp_v6_checksum_init(struct sk_buff *skb)
&ipv6_hdr(skb)->saddr,
&ipv6_hdr(skb)->daddr, 0));
- if (skb->len <= 76) {
+ if (skb->len <= 76)
return __skb_checksum_complete(skb);
- }
return 0;
}
@@ -1337,7 +1335,7 @@ static int tcp_v6_do_rcv(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
return tcp_v4_do_rcv(sk, skb);
#ifdef CONFIG_TCP_MD5SIG
- if (tcp_v6_inbound_md5_hash (sk, skb))
+ if (tcp_v6_inbound_md5_hash(sk, skb))
goto discard;
#endif
@@ -1604,7 +1602,8 @@ do_time_wait:
break;
case TCP_TW_RST:
goto no_tcp_socket;
- case TCP_TW_SUCCESS:;
+ case TCP_TW_SUCCESS:
+ ;
}
goto discard_it;
}
@@ -1649,7 +1648,7 @@ static void tcp_v6_early_demux(struct sk_buff *skb)
static struct timewait_sock_ops tcp6_timewait_sock_ops = {
.twsk_obj_size = sizeof(struct tcp6_timewait_sock),
.twsk_unique = tcp_twsk_unique,
- .twsk_destructor= tcp_twsk_destructor,
+ .twsk_destructor = tcp_twsk_destructor,
};
static const struct inet_connection_sock_af_ops ipv6_specific = {
@@ -1683,7 +1682,6 @@ static const struct tcp_sock_af_ops tcp_sock_ipv6_specific = {
/*
* TCP over IPv4 via INET6 API
*/
-
static const struct inet_connection_sock_af_ops ipv6_mapped = {
.queue_xmit = ip_queue_xmit,
.send_check = tcp_v4_send_check,
--
1.7.12
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [PATCH net-next v4 2/3] ipv6: reuse rt6_need_strict
2014-03-28 4:01 [PATCH net-next v4 0/3] ipv6: tcp_ipv6 policy route issue Wangyufen
2014-03-28 4:01 ` [PATCH net-next v4 1/3] ipv6: tcp_ipv6 do some cleanup Wangyufen
@ 2014-03-28 4:01 ` Wangyufen
2014-03-28 7:41 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2014-03-28 4:01 ` [PATCH net-next v4 3/3] ipv6: tcp_ipv6 policy route issue Wangyufen
2 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Wangyufen @ 2014-03-28 4:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: davem, netdev; +Cc: ioe, kuznet, Wang Yufen
From: Wang Yufen <wangyufen@huawei.com>
Modify the rt6_need_strict, so that it can be reused
Signed-off-by: Wang Yufen <wangyufen@huawei.com>
---
include/net/ip6_route.h | 1 +
net/ipv6/route.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/net/ip6_route.h b/include/net/ip6_route.h
index 00e3f12..d9c316e 100644
--- a/include/net/ip6_route.h
+++ b/include/net/ip6_route.h
@@ -51,6 +51,7 @@ static inline unsigned int rt6_flags2srcprefs(int flags)
return (flags >> 3) & 7;
}
+bool rt6_need_strict(const struct in6_addr *daddr);
void ip6_route_input(struct sk_buff *skb);
diff --git a/net/ipv6/route.c b/net/ipv6/route.c
index fba54a4..f5fdccc 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/route.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/route.c
@@ -373,7 +373,7 @@ static bool rt6_check_expired(const struct rt6_info *rt)
return false;
}
-static bool rt6_need_strict(const struct in6_addr *daddr)
+bool rt6_need_strict(const struct in6_addr *daddr)
{
return ipv6_addr_type(daddr) &
(IPV6_ADDR_MULTICAST | IPV6_ADDR_LINKLOCAL | IPV6_ADDR_LOOPBACK);
--
1.7.12
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [PATCH net-next v4 3/3] ipv6: tcp_ipv6 policy route issue
2014-03-28 4:01 [PATCH net-next v4 0/3] ipv6: tcp_ipv6 policy route issue Wangyufen
2014-03-28 4:01 ` [PATCH net-next v4 1/3] ipv6: tcp_ipv6 do some cleanup Wangyufen
2014-03-28 4:01 ` [PATCH net-next v4 2/3] ipv6: reuse rt6_need_strict Wangyufen
@ 2014-03-28 4:01 ` Wangyufen
2 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Wangyufen @ 2014-03-28 4:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: davem, netdev; +Cc: ioe, kuznet, Wang Yufen
From: Wang Yufen <wangyufen@huawei.com>
The issue raises when adding policy route, specify a particular
NIC as oif, the policy route did not take effect. The reason is
that fl6.oif is not set and route map failed. From the
tcp_v6_send_response function, if the binding address is linklocal,
fl6.oif is set, but not for global address.
Acked-by: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org>
Signed-off-by: Wang Yufen <wangyufen@huawei.com>
---
net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c | 18 +++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c b/net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c
index 10b7c04..5ca56ce 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c
@@ -726,7 +726,7 @@ static const struct tcp_request_sock_ops tcp_request_sock_ipv6_ops = {
#endif
static void tcp_v6_send_response(struct sk_buff *skb, u32 seq, u32 ack, u32 win,
- u32 tsval, u32 tsecr,
+ u32 tsval, u32 tsecr, int oif,
struct tcp_md5sig_key *key, int rst, u8 tclass,
u32 label)
{
@@ -798,8 +798,10 @@ static void tcp_v6_send_response(struct sk_buff *skb, u32 seq, u32 ack, u32 win,
__tcp_v6_send_check(buff, &fl6.saddr, &fl6.daddr);
fl6.flowi6_proto = IPPROTO_TCP;
- if (ipv6_addr_type(&fl6.daddr) & IPV6_ADDR_LINKLOCAL)
+ if (rt6_need_strict(&fl6.daddr) || !oif)
fl6.flowi6_oif = inet6_iif(skb);
+ else
+ fl6.flowi6_oif = oif;
fl6.fl6_dport = t1->dest;
fl6.fl6_sport = t1->source;
security_skb_classify_flow(skb, flowi6_to_flowi(&fl6));
@@ -833,6 +835,7 @@ static void tcp_v6_send_reset(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
int genhash;
struct sock *sk1 = NULL;
#endif
+ int oif;
if (th->rst)
return;
@@ -876,7 +879,8 @@ static void tcp_v6_send_reset(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
ack_seq = ntohl(th->seq) + th->syn + th->fin + skb->len -
(th->doff << 2);
- tcp_v6_send_response(skb, seq, ack_seq, 0, 0, 0, key, 1, 0, 0);
+ oif = sk ? sk->sk_bound_dev_if : 0;
+ tcp_v6_send_response(skb, seq, ack_seq, 0, 0, 0, oif, key, 1, 0, 0);
#ifdef CONFIG_TCP_MD5SIG
release_sk1:
@@ -888,11 +892,11 @@ release_sk1:
}
static void tcp_v6_send_ack(struct sk_buff *skb, u32 seq, u32 ack,
- u32 win, u32 tsval, u32 tsecr,
+ u32 win, u32 tsval, u32 tsecr, int oif,
struct tcp_md5sig_key *key, u8 tclass,
u32 label)
{
- tcp_v6_send_response(skb, seq, ack, win, tsval, tsecr, key, 0, tclass,
+ tcp_v6_send_response(skb, seq, ack, win, tsval, tsecr, oif, key, 0, tclass,
label);
}
@@ -904,7 +908,7 @@ static void tcp_v6_timewait_ack(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
tcp_v6_send_ack(skb, tcptw->tw_snd_nxt, tcptw->tw_rcv_nxt,
tcptw->tw_rcv_wnd >> tw->tw_rcv_wscale,
tcp_time_stamp + tcptw->tw_ts_offset,
- tcptw->tw_ts_recent, tcp_twsk_md5_key(tcptw),
+ tcptw->tw_ts_recent, tw->tw_bound_dev_if, tcp_twsk_md5_key(tcptw),
tw->tw_tclass, (tw->tw_flowlabel << 12));
inet_twsk_put(tw);
@@ -914,7 +918,7 @@ static void tcp_v6_reqsk_send_ack(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb,
struct request_sock *req)
{
tcp_v6_send_ack(skb, tcp_rsk(req)->snt_isn + 1, tcp_rsk(req)->rcv_isn + 1,
- req->rcv_wnd, tcp_time_stamp, req->ts_recent,
+ req->rcv_wnd, tcp_time_stamp, req->ts_recent, sk->sk_bound_dev_if,
tcp_v6_md5_do_lookup(sk, &ipv6_hdr(skb)->daddr),
0, 0);
}
--
1.7.12
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH net-next v4 2/3] ipv6: reuse rt6_need_strict
2014-03-28 4:01 ` [PATCH net-next v4 2/3] ipv6: reuse rt6_need_strict Wangyufen
@ 2014-03-28 7:41 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2014-03-28 9:04 ` wangyufen
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Hannes Frederic Sowa @ 2014-03-28 7:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Wangyufen; +Cc: davem, netdev, ioe, kuznet
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 12:01:42PM +0800, Wangyufen wrote:
> From: Wang Yufen <wangyufen@huawei.com>
>
> Modify the rt6_need_strict, so that it can be reused
>
> Signed-off-by: Wang Yufen <wangyufen@huawei.com>
> ---
> include/net/ip6_route.h | 1 +
> net/ipv6/route.c | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/net/ip6_route.h b/include/net/ip6_route.h
> index 00e3f12..d9c316e 100644
> --- a/include/net/ip6_route.h
> +++ b/include/net/ip6_route.h
> @@ -51,6 +51,7 @@ static inline unsigned int rt6_flags2srcprefs(int flags)
> return (flags >> 3) & 7;
> }
>
> +bool rt6_need_strict(const struct in6_addr *daddr);
>
> void ip6_route_input(struct sk_buff *skb);
>
> diff --git a/net/ipv6/route.c b/net/ipv6/route.c
> index fba54a4..f5fdccc 100644
> --- a/net/ipv6/route.c
> +++ b/net/ipv6/route.c
> @@ -373,7 +373,7 @@ static bool rt6_check_expired(const struct rt6_info *rt)
> return false;
> }
>
> -static bool rt6_need_strict(const struct in6_addr *daddr)
> +bool rt6_need_strict(const struct in6_addr *daddr)
> {
> return ipv6_addr_type(daddr) &
> (IPV6_ADDR_MULTICAST | IPV6_ADDR_LINKLOCAL | IPV6_ADDR_LOOPBACK);
Just a small suggestion:
I think we can move the whole function as static inline into the header.
Thanks,
Hannes
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH net-next v4 2/3] ipv6: reuse rt6_need_strict
2014-03-28 7:41 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
@ 2014-03-28 9:04 ` wangyufen
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: wangyufen @ 2014-03-28 9:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: davem, netdev, kuznet
On 2014/3/28 15:41, Hannes Frederic Sowa wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 12:01:42PM +0800, Wangyufen wrote:
>> From: Wang Yufen <wangyufen@huawei.com>
>>
>> Modify the rt6_need_strict, so that it can be reused
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Wang Yufen <wangyufen@huawei.com>
>> ---
>> include/net/ip6_route.h | 1 +
>> net/ipv6/route.c | 2 +-
>> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/net/ip6_route.h b/include/net/ip6_route.h
>> index 00e3f12..d9c316e 100644
>> --- a/include/net/ip6_route.h
>> +++ b/include/net/ip6_route.h
>> @@ -51,6 +51,7 @@ static inline unsigned int rt6_flags2srcprefs(int flags)
>> return (flags >> 3) & 7;
>> }
>>
>> +bool rt6_need_strict(const struct in6_addr *daddr);
>>
>> void ip6_route_input(struct sk_buff *skb);
>>
>> diff --git a/net/ipv6/route.c b/net/ipv6/route.c
>> index fba54a4..f5fdccc 100644
>> --- a/net/ipv6/route.c
>> +++ b/net/ipv6/route.c
>> @@ -373,7 +373,7 @@ static bool rt6_check_expired(const struct rt6_info *rt)
>> return false;
>> }
>>
>> -static bool rt6_need_strict(const struct in6_addr *daddr)
>> +bool rt6_need_strict(const struct in6_addr *daddr)
>> {
>> return ipv6_addr_type(daddr) &
>> (IPV6_ADDR_MULTICAST | IPV6_ADDR_LINKLOCAL | IPV6_ADDR_LOOPBACK);
>
> Just a small suggestion:
> I think we can move the whole function as static inline into the header.
>
Yes, thanks a lot!
I'll modify the patch.
> Thanks,
>
> Hannes
>
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-03-28 9:05 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-03-28 4:01 [PATCH net-next v4 0/3] ipv6: tcp_ipv6 policy route issue Wangyufen
2014-03-28 4:01 ` [PATCH net-next v4 1/3] ipv6: tcp_ipv6 do some cleanup Wangyufen
2014-03-28 4:01 ` [PATCH net-next v4 2/3] ipv6: reuse rt6_need_strict Wangyufen
2014-03-28 7:41 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2014-03-28 9:04 ` wangyufen
2014-03-28 4:01 ` [PATCH net-next v4 3/3] ipv6: tcp_ipv6 policy route issue Wangyufen
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.