* [xen-unstable test] 25966: regressions - FAIL
@ 2014-04-24 14:00 xen.org
2014-04-24 14:37 ` Jan Beulich
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: xen.org @ 2014-04-24 14:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: xen-devel; +Cc: ian.jackson
flight 25966 xen-unstable real [real]
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/25966/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-i386 4 xen-build fail REGR. vs. 25954
Regressions which are regarded as allowable (not blocking):
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-winxpsp3 10 guest-localmigrate fail REGR. vs. 25954
Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking:
test-armhf-armhf-xl 10 migrate-support-check fail never pass
test-amd64-i386-qemuu-rhel6hvm-amd 1 xen-build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-i386-rhel6hvm-amd 1 xen-build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-i386-qemut-rhel6hvm-amd 1 xen-build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-i386-xl-credit2 1 xen-build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-i386-xl 1 xen-build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-i386-qemut-rhel6hvm-intel 1 xen-build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-i386-rhel6hvm-intel 1 xen-build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-i386-qemuu-rhel6hvm-intel 1 xen-build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-i386-xl-multivcpu 1 xen-build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-amd64-xl-pcipt-intel 9 guest-start fail never pass
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-ovmf-amd64 1 xen-build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-i386-freebsd10-i386 1 xen-build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-i386-freebsd10-amd64 1 xen-build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-winxpsp3 1 xen-build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-winxpsp3 1 xen-build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-winxpsp3-vcpus1 1 xen-build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-winxpsp3-vcpus1 1 xen-build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-i386-pair 1 xen-build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-amd64-xl-win7-amd64 14 guest-stop fail never pass
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64 14 guest-stop fail never pass
test-amd64-i386-xl-win7-amd64 1 xen-build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-win7-amd64 1 xen-build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-winxpsp3 14 guest-stop fail never pass
test-amd64-amd64-xl-winxpsp3 14 guest-stop fail never pass
test-amd64-i386-xl-winxpsp3-vcpus1 1 xen-build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-i386-xl-winxpsp3 1 xen-build-check(1) blocked n/a
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-win7-amd64 14 guest-stop fail never pass
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64 1 xen-build-check(1) blocked n/a
version targeted for testing:
xen bf70db7cea3794cf2f3c8d714b460bba86b04791
baseline version:
xen 8cfc8e520679e029bed51ccc2540a136fc0fbd9b
------------------------------------------------------------
People who touched revisions under test:
Daniel De Graaf <dgdegra@tycho.nsa.gov>
Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com>
Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
Jason Andryuk <andryuk@aero.org>
Julien Grall <julien.grall@linaro.org>
Olaf Hering <olaf@aepfle.de>
Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@ens-lyon.org>
------------------------------------------------------------
jobs:
build-amd64 pass
build-armhf pass
build-i386 fail
build-amd64-oldkern pass
build-i386-oldkern pass
build-amd64-pvops pass
build-armhf-pvops pass
build-i386-pvops pass
test-amd64-amd64-xl pass
test-armhf-armhf-xl pass
test-amd64-i386-xl blocked
test-amd64-i386-rhel6hvm-amd blocked
test-amd64-i386-qemut-rhel6hvm-amd blocked
test-amd64-i386-qemuu-rhel6hvm-amd blocked
test-amd64-i386-freebsd10-amd64 blocked
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-ovmf-amd64 pass
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-ovmf-amd64 blocked
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-win7-amd64 fail
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-win7-amd64 blocked
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64 fail
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64 blocked
test-amd64-amd64-xl-win7-amd64 fail
test-amd64-i386-xl-win7-amd64 blocked
test-amd64-i386-xl-credit2 blocked
test-amd64-i386-freebsd10-i386 blocked
test-amd64-amd64-xl-pcipt-intel fail
test-amd64-i386-rhel6hvm-intel blocked
test-amd64-i386-qemut-rhel6hvm-intel blocked
test-amd64-i386-qemuu-rhel6hvm-intel blocked
test-amd64-i386-xl-multivcpu blocked
test-amd64-amd64-pair pass
test-amd64-i386-pair blocked
test-amd64-amd64-xl-sedf-pin pass
test-amd64-amd64-xl-sedf pass
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-winxpsp3-vcpus1 blocked
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-winxpsp3-vcpus1 blocked
test-amd64-i386-xl-winxpsp3-vcpus1 blocked
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-winxpsp3 fail
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-winxpsp3 blocked
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-winxpsp3 fail
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-winxpsp3 blocked
test-amd64-amd64-xl-winxpsp3 fail
test-amd64-i386-xl-winxpsp3 blocked
------------------------------------------------------------
sg-report-flight on osstest.cam.xci-test.com
logs: /home/xc_osstest/logs
images: /home/xc_osstest/images
Logs, config files, etc. are available at
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs
Test harness code can be found at
http://xenbits.xensource.com/gitweb?p=osstest.git;a=summary
Not pushing.
(No revision log; it would be 509 lines long.)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [xen-unstable test] 25966: regressions - FAIL
2014-04-24 14:00 [xen-unstable test] 25966: regressions - FAIL xen.org
@ 2014-04-24 14:37 ` Jan Beulich
2014-04-24 16:20 ` Ian Campbell
2014-04-24 20:38 ` Daniel De Graaf
0 siblings, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Jan Beulich @ 2014-04-24 14:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: andryuk, dgdegra; +Cc: xen-devel, ian.jackson
>>> On 24.04.14 at 16:00, <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com> wrote:
> flight 25966 xen-unstable real [real]
> http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/25966/
>
> Regressions :-(
>
> Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
> including tests which could not be run:
> build-i386 4 xen-build fail REGR. vs. 25954
Was a 32-bit build perhaps not tried before submitting that recent
series?
vtpm_cmd_handler.c:454:2: error: large integer implicitly truncated to unsigned type [-Werror=overflow]
vtpm_cmd_handler.c:454:2: error: large integer implicitly truncated to unsigned type [-Werror=overflow]
vtpm_cmd_handler.c:454:2: error: large integer implicitly truncated to unsigned type [-Werror=overflow]
vtpm_cmd_handler.c:455:2: error: large integer implicitly truncated to unsigned type [-Werror=overflow]
vtpm_cmd_handler.c:455:2: error: large integer implicitly truncated to unsigned type [-Werror=overflow]
vtpm_cmd_handler.c:455:2: error: large integer implicitly truncated to unsigned type [-Werror=overflow]
vtpm_cmd_handler.c:456:2: error: large integer implicitly truncated to unsigned type [-Werror=overflow]
vtpm_cmd_handler.c:456:2: error: large integer implicitly truncated to unsigned type [-Werror=overflow]
vtpm_cmd_handler.c:456:2: error: large integer implicitly truncated to unsigned type [-Werror=overflow]
vtpm_cmd_handler.c:457:2: error: large integer implicitly truncated to unsigned type [-Werror=overflow]
vtpm_cmd_handler.c:457:2: error: large integer implicitly truncated to unsigned type [-Werror=overflow]
vtpm_cmd_handler.c:457:2: error: large integer implicitly truncated to unsigned type [-Werror=overflow]
vtpm_cmd_handler.c:458:2: error: large integer implicitly truncated to unsigned type [-Werror=overflow]
vtpm_cmd_handler.c:458:2: error: large integer implicitly truncated to unsigned type [-Werror=overflow]
vtpm_cmd_handler.c:458:2: error: large integer implicitly truncated to unsigned type [-Werror=overflow]
vtpm_cmd_handler.c:459:2: error: large integer implicitly truncated to unsigned type [-Werror=overflow]
vtpm_cmd_handler.c:459:2: error: large integer implicitly truncated to unsigned type [-Werror=overflow]
vtpm_cmd_handler.c:459:2: error: large integer implicitly truncated to unsigned type [-Werror=overflow]
vtpm_cmd_handler.c:460:2: error: large integer implicitly truncated to unsigned type [-Werror=overflow]
vtpm_cmd_handler.c:460:2: error: large integer implicitly truncated to unsigned type [-Werror=overflow]
vtpm_cmd_handler.c:460:2: error: large integer implicitly truncated to unsigned type [-Werror=overflow]
vtpm_cmd_handler.c:461:2: error: large integer implicitly truncated to unsigned type [-Werror=overflow]
vtpm_cmd_handler.c:461:2: error: large integer implicitly truncated to unsigned type [-Werror=overflow]
vtpm_cmd_handler.c:461:2: error: large integer implicitly truncated to unsigned type [-Werror=overflow]
vtpm_cmd_handler.c:462:2: error: large integer implicitly truncated to unsigned type [-Werror=overflow]
vtpm_cmd_handler.c:462:2: error: large integer implicitly truncated to unsigned type [-Werror=overflow]
vtpm_cmd_handler.c:462:2: error: large integer implicitly truncated to unsigned type [-Werror=overflow]
vtpm_cmd_handler.c:463:2: error: large integer implicitly truncated to unsigned type [-Werror=overflow]
vtpm_cmd_handler.c:463:2: error: large integer implicitly truncated to unsigned type [-Werror=overflow]
vtpm_cmd_handler.c:463:2: error: large integer implicitly truncated to unsigned type [-Werror=overflow]
vtpm_cmd_handler.c:464:2: error: large integer implicitly truncated to unsigned type [-Werror=overflow]
vtpm_cmd_handler.c:464:2: error: large integer implicitly truncated to unsigned type [-Werror=overflow]
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
make[2]: *** [vtpm_cmd_handler.o] Error 1
make[1]: *** [vtpmmgr] Error 2
Jan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [xen-unstable test] 25966: regressions - FAIL
2014-04-24 14:37 ` Jan Beulich
@ 2014-04-24 16:20 ` Ian Campbell
2014-04-24 16:25 ` Jan Beulich
2014-04-24 20:38 ` Daniel De Graaf
1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Ian Campbell @ 2014-04-24 16:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jan Beulich; +Cc: xen-devel, dgdegra, andryuk, ian.jackson
On Thu, 2014-04-24 at 15:37 +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 24.04.14 at 16:00, <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com> wrote:
> > flight 25966 xen-unstable real [real]
> > http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/25966/
> >
> > Regressions :-(
> >
> > Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
> > including tests which could not be run:
> > build-i386 4 xen-build fail REGR. vs. 25954
>
> Was a 32-bit build perhaps not tried before submitting that recent
> series?
Evidently not and I'm not in the habits of build testing the 32-bit
tools as part of my commit routine. I should fix this.
The code in question is:
static t_uint Pp[256 / sizeof(t_uint)] = {
0xFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFUL, 0x15728E5A8AACAA68UL, 0x15D2261898FA0510UL,
0x3995497CEA956AE5UL, 0xDE2BCBF695581718UL, 0xB5C55DF06F4C52C9UL,
0x9B2783A2EC07A28FUL, 0xE39E772C180E8603UL, 0x32905E462E36CE3BUL,
0xF1746C08CA18217CUL, 0x670C354E4ABC9804UL, 0x9ED529077096966DUL,
0x1C62F356208552BBUL, 0x83655D23DCA3AD96UL, 0x69163FA8FD24CF5FUL,
0x98DA48361C55D39AUL, 0xC2007CB8A163BF05UL, 0x49286651ECE45B3DUL,
0xAE9F24117C4B1FE6UL, 0xEE386BFB5A899FA5UL, 0x0BFF5CB6F406B7EDUL,
0xF44C42E9A637ED6BUL, 0xE485B576625E7EC6UL, 0x4FE1356D6D51C245UL,
0x302B0A6DF25F1437UL, 0xEF9519B3CD3A431BUL, 0x514A08798E3404DDUL,
0x020BBEA63B139B22UL, 0x29024E088A67CC74UL, 0xC4C6628B80DC1CD1UL,
0xC90FDAA22168C234UL, 0xFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFUL,
Where t_uint is apparently a unsigned long provided by polarssl, I
think, it's not obvious because it can apparently sometimes be 8 or 16
bits too, depending on *not*sure*.
Ian.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [xen-unstable test] 25966: regressions - FAIL
2014-04-24 16:20 ` Ian Campbell
@ 2014-04-24 16:25 ` Jan Beulich
2014-04-24 16:28 ` Ian Campbell
2014-04-24 16:32 ` Ian Campbell
0 siblings, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Jan Beulich @ 2014-04-24 16:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ian Campbell; +Cc: xen-devel, dgdegra, andryuk, ian.jackson
>>> On 24.04.14 at 18:20, <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-04-24 at 15:37 +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> >>> On 24.04.14 at 16:00, <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com> wrote:
>> > flight 25966 xen-unstable real [real]
>> > http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/25966/
>> >
>> > Regressions :-(
>> >
>> > Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
>> > including tests which could not be run:
>> > build-i386 4 xen-build fail REGR. vs.
> 25954
>>
>> Was a 32-bit build perhaps not tried before submitting that recent
>> series?
>
> Evidently not and I'm not in the habits of build testing the 32-bit
> tools as part of my commit routine. I should fix this.
Not sure - the complaint was specifically not to you, but the authors
of the series: They should certainly test both ways before submitting.
Jan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [xen-unstable test] 25966: regressions - FAIL
2014-04-24 16:25 ` Jan Beulich
@ 2014-04-24 16:28 ` Ian Campbell
2014-04-24 16:32 ` Ian Campbell
1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Ian Campbell @ 2014-04-24 16:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jan Beulich; +Cc: xen-devel, dgdegra, andryuk, ian.jackson
On Thu, 2014-04-24 at 17:25 +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 24.04.14 at 18:20, <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, 2014-04-24 at 15:37 +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> >>> On 24.04.14 at 16:00, <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com> wrote:
> >> > flight 25966 xen-unstable real [real]
> >> > http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/25966/
> >> >
> >> > Regressions :-(
> >> >
> >> > Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
> >> > including tests which could not be run:
> >> > build-i386 4 xen-build fail REGR. vs.
> > 25954
> >>
> >> Was a 32-bit build perhaps not tried before submitting that recent
> >> series?
> >
> > Evidently not and I'm not in the habits of build testing the 32-bit
> > tools as part of my commit routine. I should fix this.
>
> Not sure - the complaint was specifically not to you, but the authors
> of the series: They should certainly test both ways before submitting.
Oh absolutely, and I understood you weren't griping at me, but I do try
and build stuff before I push it specifically to avoid this sort of
thing blocking the tree.
Ian.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [xen-unstable test] 25966: regressions - FAIL
2014-04-24 16:25 ` Jan Beulich
2014-04-24 16:28 ` Ian Campbell
@ 2014-04-24 16:32 ` Ian Campbell
1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Ian Campbell @ 2014-04-24 16:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jan Beulich; +Cc: xen-devel, dgdegra, andryuk, ian.jackson
On Thu, 2014-04-24 at 17:25 +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 24.04.14 at 18:20, <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, 2014-04-24 at 15:37 +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> >>> On 24.04.14 at 16:00, <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com> wrote:
> >> > flight 25966 xen-unstable real [real]
> >> > http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/25966/
> >> >
> >> > Regressions :-(
> >> >
> >> > Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
> >> > including tests which could not be run:
> >> > build-i386 4 xen-build fail REGR. vs.
> > 25954
> >>
> >> Was a 32-bit build perhaps not tried before submitting that recent
> >> series?
> >
> > Evidently not and I'm not in the habits of build testing the 32-bit
> > tools as part of my commit routine. I should fix this.
>
> Not sure - the complaint was specifically not to you, but the authors
> of the series: They should certainly test both ways before submitting.
I think the problematic code came from:
commit 5c3705c900581af6f30be124ab8fb64603bdca03
Author: Daniel De Graaf <dgdegra@tycho.nsa.gov>
Date: Mon Apr 21 13:22:57 2014 -0400
vtpmmgr: add TPM group support
Backing it out would I suppose involve reverting all of the following
patches from the series:
$ git log --oneline 5c3705c900581af6f30be124ab8fb64603bdca03..origin/staging -- stubdom/
5ff49ec vtpmmgr: use XSM label as vTPM kernel hash
331d4b0 stubdom/grub: verify vTPM label if requested
f00b68e vtpm: add deep quote support
d4ea6ab vtpm: add ordinal for obtaining an EK signature
c1fe4dc vtpm: passthru requests to manager
2c8a51e vtpmmgr: Convert TPM_Seal to use TPM_PCR_INFO_LONG
d426026 vtpmmgr: Store hardware TPM Locality
Hopefully Daniel (or someone) can fix this over (my) night and I can
commit the fix in the morning instead of reverting.
Ian.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [xen-unstable test] 25966: regressions - FAIL
2014-04-24 14:37 ` Jan Beulich
2014-04-24 16:20 ` Ian Campbell
@ 2014-04-24 20:38 ` Daniel De Graaf
1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Daniel De Graaf @ 2014-04-24 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jan Beulich; +Cc: xen-devel, andryuk, ian.jackson
On 04/24/2014 10:37 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 24.04.14 at 16:00, <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com> wrote:
>> flight 25966 xen-unstable real [real]
>> http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/25966/
>>
>> Regressions :-(
>>
>> Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
>> including tests which could not be run:
>> build-i386 4 xen-build fail REGR. vs. 25954
>
> Was a 32-bit build perhaps not tried before submitting that recent
> series?
>
> vtpm_cmd_handler.c:454:2: error: large integer implicitly truncated to unsigned type [-Werror=overflow]
For some reason I thought that mini-os domains required being built
as 64-bit. Now that I think about this, it is obviously not true as
pv-grub is already 32-bit capable. A fix for the compilation error
is posted and is compile tested; I will make sure the runtime works
later, although I don't see any obvious reasons for it to fail.
--
Daniel De Graaf
National Security Agency
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-04-24 20:39 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-04-24 14:00 [xen-unstable test] 25966: regressions - FAIL xen.org
2014-04-24 14:37 ` Jan Beulich
2014-04-24 16:20 ` Ian Campbell
2014-04-24 16:25 ` Jan Beulich
2014-04-24 16:28 ` Ian Campbell
2014-04-24 16:32 ` Ian Campbell
2014-04-24 20:38 ` Daniel De Graaf
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.