* Re: [PATCH 00/17] ARM: S5P64X0, S5PC100: no more support in mainline
2014-06-30 21:32 ` Kukjin Kim
@ 2014-06-30 13:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 83+ messages in thread
From: Arnd Bergmann @ 2014-06-30 13:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel; +Cc: Kukjin Kim, linux-samsung-soc
On Tuesday 01 July 2014 06:32:10 Kukjin Kim wrote:
> This series removes S5P64X0 and S5PC100 related codes in mainline,
> because no more user now. And if its supporting is required later,
> it will be done with using device tree.
>
Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Your patch 1/17 has not made it to the mailing list, it's probably too
large. Can you try recreating the patch using 'git format-patch -D'?
I'd like to see the changes to arch/arm/plat-samsung.
Arnd
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 83+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 00/17] ARM: S5P64X0, S5PC100: no more support in mainline
@ 2014-06-30 13:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
0 siblings, 0 replies; 83+ messages in thread
From: Arnd Bergmann @ 2014-06-30 13:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On Tuesday 01 July 2014 06:32:10 Kukjin Kim wrote:
> This series removes S5P64X0 and S5PC100 related codes in mainline,
> because no more user now. And if its supporting is required later,
> it will be done with using device tree.
>
Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Your patch 1/17 has not made it to the mailing list, it's probably too
large. Can you try recreating the patch using 'git format-patch -D'?
I'd like to see the changes to arch/arm/plat-samsung.
Arnd
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 83+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 16/17] [media] exynos4-is: removes s5pc100 related fimc codes
2014-06-30 21:32 ` Kukjin Kim
@ 2014-06-30 14:03 ` Sylwester Nawrocki
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 83+ messages in thread
From: Sylwester Nawrocki @ 2014-06-30 14:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kukjin Kim
Cc: linux-arm-kernel, linux-samsung-soc, Mauro Carvalho Chehab, LMML
On 30/06/14 23:32, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> This patch removes s5pc100 related fimc codes because of no more support
> S5PC100 SoC in mainline.
I have applied this patch to my tree. It's also fine if you would like to
merge the whole series together. In such case feel free to add:
Acked-by: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com>
Please let me know if you want me to drop this patch from the media tree.
--
Regards,
Sylwester
> Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
> Cc: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com>
> Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <m.chehab@samsung.com>
> ---
> Documentation/video4linux/fimc.txt | 2 +-
> drivers/media/platform/exynos4-is/fimc-core.c | 15 ---------------
> 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/video4linux/fimc.txt b/Documentation/video4linux/fimc.txt
> index e0c6b8b..1441fcf 100644
> --- a/Documentation/video4linux/fimc.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/video4linux/fimc.txt
> @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ drivers/media/platform/exynos4-is directory.
> 1. Supported SoCs
> =================
>
> -S5PC100 (mem-to-mem only), S5PV210, EXYNOS4210
> +S5PV210, EXYNOS4210
>
> 2. Supported features
> =====================
> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/exynos4-is/fimc-core.c b/drivers/media/platform/exynos4-is/fimc-core.c
> index b70fd99..5c800b4 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/platform/exynos4-is/fimc-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/exynos4-is/fimc-core.c
> @@ -1204,18 +1204,6 @@ static const struct fimc_variant fimc2_variant_s5pv210 = {
> .pix_limit = &s5p_pix_limit[2],
> };
>
> -/* S5PC100 */
> -static const struct fimc_drvdata fimc_drvdata_s5p = {
> - .variant = {
> - [0] = &fimc0_variant_s5p,
> - [1] = &fimc0_variant_s5p,
> - [2] = &fimc2_variant_s5p,
> - },
> - .num_entities = 3,
> - .lclk_frequency = 133000000UL,
> - .out_buf_count = 4,
> -};
> -
> /* S5PV210, S5PC110 */
> static const struct fimc_drvdata fimc_drvdata_s5pv210 = {
> .variant = {
> @@ -1251,9 +1239,6 @@ static const struct fimc_drvdata fimc_drvdata_exynos4x12 = {
>
> static const struct platform_device_id fimc_driver_ids[] = {
> {
> - .name = "s5p-fimc",
> - .driver_data = (unsigned long)&fimc_drvdata_s5p,
> - }, {
> .name = "s5pv210-fimc",
> .driver_data = (unsigned long)&fimc_drvdata_s5pv210,
> }, {
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 83+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 16/17] [media] exynos4-is: removes s5pc100 related fimc codes
@ 2014-06-30 14:03 ` Sylwester Nawrocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 83+ messages in thread
From: Sylwester Nawrocki @ 2014-06-30 14:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On 30/06/14 23:32, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> This patch removes s5pc100 related fimc codes because of no more support
> S5PC100 SoC in mainline.
I have applied this patch to my tree. It's also fine if you would like to
merge the whole series together. In such case feel free to add:
Acked-by: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com>
Please let me know if you want me to drop this patch from the media tree.
--
Regards,
Sylwester
> Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
> Cc: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com>
> Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <m.chehab@samsung.com>
> ---
> Documentation/video4linux/fimc.txt | 2 +-
> drivers/media/platform/exynos4-is/fimc-core.c | 15 ---------------
> 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/video4linux/fimc.txt b/Documentation/video4linux/fimc.txt
> index e0c6b8b..1441fcf 100644
> --- a/Documentation/video4linux/fimc.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/video4linux/fimc.txt
> @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ drivers/media/platform/exynos4-is directory.
> 1. Supported SoCs
> =================
>
> -S5PC100 (mem-to-mem only), S5PV210, EXYNOS4210
> +S5PV210, EXYNOS4210
>
> 2. Supported features
> =====================
> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/exynos4-is/fimc-core.c b/drivers/media/platform/exynos4-is/fimc-core.c
> index b70fd99..5c800b4 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/platform/exynos4-is/fimc-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/exynos4-is/fimc-core.c
> @@ -1204,18 +1204,6 @@ static const struct fimc_variant fimc2_variant_s5pv210 = {
> .pix_limit = &s5p_pix_limit[2],
> };
>
> -/* S5PC100 */
> -static const struct fimc_drvdata fimc_drvdata_s5p = {
> - .variant = {
> - [0] = &fimc0_variant_s5p,
> - [1] = &fimc0_variant_s5p,
> - [2] = &fimc2_variant_s5p,
> - },
> - .num_entities = 3,
> - .lclk_frequency = 133000000UL,
> - .out_buf_count = 4,
> -};
> -
> /* S5PV210, S5PC110 */
> static const struct fimc_drvdata fimc_drvdata_s5pv210 = {
> .variant = {
> @@ -1251,9 +1239,6 @@ static const struct fimc_drvdata fimc_drvdata_exynos4x12 = {
>
> static const struct platform_device_id fimc_driver_ids[] = {
> {
> - .name = "s5p-fimc",
> - .driver_data = (unsigned long)&fimc_drvdata_s5p,
> - }, {
> .name = "s5pv210-fimc",
> .driver_data = (unsigned long)&fimc_drvdata_s5pv210,
> }, {
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 83+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 00/17] ARM: S5P64X0, S5PC100: no more support in mainline
2014-06-30 13:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
@ 2014-06-30 14:22 ` Thierry Reding
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 83+ messages in thread
From: Thierry Reding @ 2014-06-30 14:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Arnd Bergmann; +Cc: linux-arm-kernel, linux-samsung-soc, Kukjin Kim
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 649 bytes --]
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 03:34:27PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 01 July 2014 06:32:10 Kukjin Kim wrote:
> > This series removes S5P64X0 and S5PC100 related codes in mainline,
> > because no more user now. And if its supporting is required later,
> > it will be done with using device tree.
> >
>
> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
It seems like I'm not completely up-to-date. What happened to our prime
directive never to remove support for boards? Why is this special? What
about people that still use this hardware? The commit message says that
there are no longer any users. How was this determined?
Thierry
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 83+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 00/17] ARM: S5P64X0, S5PC100: no more support in mainline
@ 2014-06-30 14:22 ` Thierry Reding
0 siblings, 0 replies; 83+ messages in thread
From: Thierry Reding @ 2014-06-30 14:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 03:34:27PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 01 July 2014 06:32:10 Kukjin Kim wrote:
> > This series removes S5P64X0 and S5PC100 related codes in mainline,
> > because no more user now. And if its supporting is required later,
> > it will be done with using device tree.
> >
>
> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
It seems like I'm not completely up-to-date. What happened to our prime
directive never to remove support for boards? Why is this special? What
about people that still use this hardware? The commit message says that
there are no longer any users. How was this determined?
Thierry
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20140630/d8c55375/attachment.sig>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 83+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 00/17] ARM: S5P64X0, S5PC100: no more support in mainline
2014-06-30 14:22 ` Thierry Reding
@ 2014-06-30 14:31 ` Arnd Bergmann
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 83+ messages in thread
From: Arnd Bergmann @ 2014-06-30 14:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel; +Cc: Thierry Reding, Kukjin Kim, linux-samsung-soc
On Monday 30 June 2014 16:22:25 Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 03:34:27PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Tuesday 01 July 2014 06:32:10 Kukjin Kim wrote:
> > > This series removes S5P64X0 and S5PC100 related codes in mainline,
> > > because no more user now. And if its supporting is required later,
> > > it will be done with using device tree.
> > >
> >
> > Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
>
> It seems like I'm not completely up-to-date. What happened to our prime
> directive never to remove support for boards? Why is this special? What
> about people that still use this hardware? The commit message says that
> there are no longer any users. How was this determined?
>From what I can tell, the supported machines on these two platforms are
all the official development prototypes, not production boards, and they
came out in rather small quantities, probably Samsung-internal for the
most part. The maintainers have previously assured me they are not aware
of anybody using it, and I trust their judgment.
I'm totally fine with removing support for these machines, and we have
removed a number of similar platforms in the past. The rule is not that
we never remove stuff, the rule is that we never break things for
active users.
As always, if it turns out that we missed some active users, we will
revert these patches, or bring support back another way.
This should probably all be spelled out explicitly in the changelog
for patch 1, which I admit I have not seen.
Arnd
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 83+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 00/17] ARM: S5P64X0, S5PC100: no more support in mainline
@ 2014-06-30 14:31 ` Arnd Bergmann
0 siblings, 0 replies; 83+ messages in thread
From: Arnd Bergmann @ 2014-06-30 14:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On Monday 30 June 2014 16:22:25 Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 03:34:27PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Tuesday 01 July 2014 06:32:10 Kukjin Kim wrote:
> > > This series removes S5P64X0 and S5PC100 related codes in mainline,
> > > because no more user now. And if its supporting is required later,
> > > it will be done with using device tree.
> > >
> >
> > Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
>
> It seems like I'm not completely up-to-date. What happened to our prime
> directive never to remove support for boards? Why is this special? What
> about people that still use this hardware? The commit message says that
> there are no longer any users. How was this determined?
>From what I can tell, the supported machines on these two platforms are
all the official development prototypes, not production boards, and they
came out in rather small quantities, probably Samsung-internal for the
most part. The maintainers have previously assured me they are not aware
of anybody using it, and I trust their judgment.
I'm totally fine with removing support for these machines, and we have
removed a number of similar platforms in the past. The rule is not that
we never remove stuff, the rule is that we never break things for
active users.
As always, if it turns out that we missed some active users, we will
revert these patches, or bring support back another way.
This should probably all be spelled out explicitly in the changelog
for patch 1, which I admit I have not seen.
Arnd
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 83+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 13/17] ata: pata_samsung_cf: removes s5pc100 related ata codes
2014-06-30 21:32 ` Kukjin Kim
@ 2014-06-30 14:49 ` Tejun Heo
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 83+ messages in thread
From: Tejun Heo @ 2014-06-30 14:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kukjin Kim; +Cc: linux-arm-kernel, linux-samsung-soc
On Tue, Jul 01, 2014 at 06:32:23AM +0900, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> This patch removes support for s5pc100 ata because of no more support
> S5PC100 SoC in mainline.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Applied to libata/for-3.17.
Thanks.
--
tejun
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 83+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 13/17] ata: pata_samsung_cf: removes s5pc100 related ata codes
@ 2014-06-30 14:49 ` Tejun Heo
0 siblings, 0 replies; 83+ messages in thread
From: Tejun Heo @ 2014-06-30 14:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On Tue, Jul 01, 2014 at 06:32:23AM +0900, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> This patch removes support for s5pc100 ata because of no more support
> S5PC100 SoC in mainline.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Applied to libata/for-3.17.
Thanks.
--
tejun
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 83+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 00/17] ARM: S5P64X0, S5PC100: no more support in mainline
2014-06-30 21:32 ` Kukjin Kim
@ 2014-06-30 15:31 ` Tushar Behera
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 83+ messages in thread
From: Tushar Behera @ 2014-06-30 15:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kukjin Kim, linux-arm-kernel, linux-samsung-soc
On 07/01/2014 03:02 AM, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> This series removes S5P64X0 and S5PC100 related codes in mainline,
> because no more user now. And if its supporting is required later,
> it will be done with using device tree.
>
> [PATCH 01/17] ARM: S5P64X0: no more support S5P6440 and S5P6450 SoCs
> [PATCH 02/17] gpio: samsung: remove s5p64x0 related gpio codes
> [PATCH 03/17] spi: s3c64xx: remove s5p64x0 related spi codes
> [PATCH 04/17] ASoC: samsung: no more support for S5P6440 and S5P6450
> [PATCH 05/17] pwm: samsung: remove s5p64x0 related pwm codes
> [PATCH 06/17] video: fbdev: s3c-fb: remove s5p64x0 related fimd
> [PATCH 07/17] serial: samsung: no more support for S5P6440 and
> [PATCH 08/17] ARM: S5PC100: no more support S5PC100 SoC
> [PATCH 09/17] gpio: samsung: remov s5pc100 related gpio codes
> [PATCH 10/17] spi: s3c64xx: remove s5pc100 related spi codes
> [PATCH 11/17] pwm: samsung: remove s5pc100 related pwm codes
> [PATCH 12/17] serial: samsung: no more support for S5PC100 SoC
> [PATCH 13/17] ata: pata_samsung_cf: removes s5pc100 related ata
> [PATCH 14/17] mtd: onenand: remove s5pc100 related onenand codes
> [PATCH 15/17] video: fbdev: s3c-fb: remove s5pc100 related fimd and
> [PATCH 16/17] [media] exynos4-is: removes s5pc100 related fimc codes
> [PATCH 17/17] ASoC: Samsung: remove s5pc100 related codes
>
One more reference to S5PC100 can be found at drivers/irqchip/Kconfig.
diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig b/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig
index 131f185..9f39cc6 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig
@@ -23,7 +23,6 @@ config ARM_VIC
config ARM_VIC_NR
int
default 4 if ARCH_S5PV210
- default 3 if ARCH_S5PC100
default 2
depends on ARM_VIC
help
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
>
--
Tushar Behera
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 83+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 00/17] ARM: S5P64X0, S5PC100: no more support in mainline
@ 2014-06-30 15:31 ` Tushar Behera
0 siblings, 0 replies; 83+ messages in thread
From: Tushar Behera @ 2014-06-30 15:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On 07/01/2014 03:02 AM, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> This series removes S5P64X0 and S5PC100 related codes in mainline,
> because no more user now. And if its supporting is required later,
> it will be done with using device tree.
>
> [PATCH 01/17] ARM: S5P64X0: no more support S5P6440 and S5P6450 SoCs
> [PATCH 02/17] gpio: samsung: remove s5p64x0 related gpio codes
> [PATCH 03/17] spi: s3c64xx: remove s5p64x0 related spi codes
> [PATCH 04/17] ASoC: samsung: no more support for S5P6440 and S5P6450
> [PATCH 05/17] pwm: samsung: remove s5p64x0 related pwm codes
> [PATCH 06/17] video: fbdev: s3c-fb: remove s5p64x0 related fimd
> [PATCH 07/17] serial: samsung: no more support for S5P6440 and
> [PATCH 08/17] ARM: S5PC100: no more support S5PC100 SoC
> [PATCH 09/17] gpio: samsung: remov s5pc100 related gpio codes
> [PATCH 10/17] spi: s3c64xx: remove s5pc100 related spi codes
> [PATCH 11/17] pwm: samsung: remove s5pc100 related pwm codes
> [PATCH 12/17] serial: samsung: no more support for S5PC100 SoC
> [PATCH 13/17] ata: pata_samsung_cf: removes s5pc100 related ata
> [PATCH 14/17] mtd: onenand: remove s5pc100 related onenand codes
> [PATCH 15/17] video: fbdev: s3c-fb: remove s5pc100 related fimd and
> [PATCH 16/17] [media] exynos4-is: removes s5pc100 related fimc codes
> [PATCH 17/17] ASoC: Samsung: remove s5pc100 related codes
>
One more reference to S5PC100 can be found at drivers/irqchip/Kconfig.
diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig b/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig
index 131f185..9f39cc6 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig
@@ -23,7 +23,6 @@ config ARM_VIC
config ARM_VIC_NR
int
default 4 if ARCH_S5PV210
- default 3 if ARCH_S5PC100
default 2
depends on ARM_VIC
help
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
>
--
Tushar Behera
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 83+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 00/17] ARM: S5P64X0, S5PC100: no more support in mainline
@ 2014-06-30 21:32 ` Kukjin Kim
0 siblings, 0 replies; 83+ messages in thread
From: Kukjin Kim @ 2014-06-30 21:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel, linux-samsung-soc
This series removes S5P64X0 and S5PC100 related codes in mainline,
because no more user now. And if its supporting is required later,
it will be done with using device tree.
[PATCH 01/17] ARM: S5P64X0: no more support S5P6440 and S5P6450 SoCs
[PATCH 02/17] gpio: samsung: remove s5p64x0 related gpio codes
[PATCH 03/17] spi: s3c64xx: remove s5p64x0 related spi codes
[PATCH 04/17] ASoC: samsung: no more support for S5P6440 and S5P6450
[PATCH 05/17] pwm: samsung: remove s5p64x0 related pwm codes
[PATCH 06/17] video: fbdev: s3c-fb: remove s5p64x0 related fimd
[PATCH 07/17] serial: samsung: no more support for S5P6440 and
[PATCH 08/17] ARM: S5PC100: no more support S5PC100 SoC
[PATCH 09/17] gpio: samsung: remov s5pc100 related gpio codes
[PATCH 10/17] spi: s3c64xx: remove s5pc100 related spi codes
[PATCH 11/17] pwm: samsung: remove s5pc100 related pwm codes
[PATCH 12/17] serial: samsung: no more support for S5PC100 SoC
[PATCH 13/17] ata: pata_samsung_cf: removes s5pc100 related ata
[PATCH 14/17] mtd: onenand: remove s5pc100 related onenand codes
[PATCH 15/17] video: fbdev: s3c-fb: remove s5pc100 related fimd and
[PATCH 16/17] [media] exynos4-is: removes s5pc100 related fimc codes
[PATCH 17/17] ASoC: Samsung: remove s5pc100 related codes
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 83+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 00/17] ARM: S5P64X0, S5PC100: no more support in mainline
@ 2014-06-30 21:32 ` Kukjin Kim
0 siblings, 0 replies; 83+ messages in thread
From: Kukjin Kim @ 2014-06-30 21:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
This series removes S5P64X0 and S5PC100 related codes in mainline,
because no more user now. And if its supporting is required later,
it will be done with using device tree.
[PATCH 01/17] ARM: S5P64X0: no more support S5P6440 and S5P6450 SoCs
[PATCH 02/17] gpio: samsung: remove s5p64x0 related gpio codes
[PATCH 03/17] spi: s3c64xx: remove s5p64x0 related spi codes
[PATCH 04/17] ASoC: samsung: no more support for S5P6440 and S5P6450
[PATCH 05/17] pwm: samsung: remove s5p64x0 related pwm codes
[PATCH 06/17] video: fbdev: s3c-fb: remove s5p64x0 related fimd
[PATCH 07/17] serial: samsung: no more support for S5P6440 and
[PATCH 08/17] ARM: S5PC100: no more support S5PC100 SoC
[PATCH 09/17] gpio: samsung: remov s5pc100 related gpio codes
[PATCH 10/17] spi: s3c64xx: remove s5pc100 related spi codes
[PATCH 11/17] pwm: samsung: remove s5pc100 related pwm codes
[PATCH 12/17] serial: samsung: no more support for S5PC100 SoC
[PATCH 13/17] ata: pata_samsung_cf: removes s5pc100 related ata
[PATCH 14/17] mtd: onenand: remove s5pc100 related onenand codes
[PATCH 15/17] video: fbdev: s3c-fb: remove s5pc100 related fimd and
[PATCH 16/17] [media] exynos4-is: removes s5pc100 related fimc codes
[PATCH 17/17] ASoC: Samsung: remove s5pc100 related codes
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 83+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 02/17] gpio: samsung: remove s5p64x0 related gpio codes
2014-06-30 21:32 ` Kukjin Kim
@ 2014-06-30 21:32 ` Kukjin Kim
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 83+ messages in thread
From: Kukjin Kim @ 2014-06-30 21:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel, linux-samsung-soc; +Cc: Kukjin Kim, Linus Walleij
This patch removes gpio codes for s5p6440 and s5p6450 SoCs.
Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
---
drivers/gpio/gpio-samsung.c | 446 -------------------------------------------
1 file changed, 446 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-samsung.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-samsung.c
index 07105ee..d12945c 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-samsung.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-samsung.c
@@ -358,47 +358,6 @@ static unsigned s3c24xx_gpio_getcfg_abank(struct samsung_gpio_chip *chip,
}
#endif
-#if defined(CONFIG_CPU_S5P6440) || defined(CONFIG_CPU_S5P6450)
-static int s5p64x0_gpio_setcfg_rbank(struct samsung_gpio_chip *chip,
- unsigned int off, unsigned int cfg)
-{
- void __iomem *reg = chip->base;
- unsigned int shift;
- u32 con;
-
- switch (off) {
- case 0:
- case 1:
- case 2:
- case 3:
- case 4:
- case 5:
- shift = (off & 7) * 4;
- reg -= 4;
- break;
- case 6:
- shift = ((off + 1) & 7) * 4;
- reg -= 4;
- break;
- default:
- shift = ((off + 1) & 7) * 4;
- break;
- }
-
- if (samsung_gpio_is_cfg_special(cfg)) {
- cfg &= 0xf;
- cfg <<= shift;
- }
-
- con = __raw_readl(reg);
- con &= ~(0xf << shift);
- con |= cfg;
- __raw_writel(con, reg);
-
- return 0;
-}
-#endif
-
static void __init samsung_gpiolib_set_cfg(struct samsung_gpio_cfg *chipcfg,
int nr_chips)
{
@@ -426,16 +385,6 @@ static struct samsung_gpio_cfg s3c24xx_gpiocfg_banka = {
};
#endif
-#if defined(CONFIG_CPU_S5P6440) || defined(CONFIG_CPU_S5P6450)
-static struct samsung_gpio_cfg s5p64x0_gpio_cfg_rbank = {
- .cfg_eint = 0x3,
- .set_config = s5p64x0_gpio_setcfg_rbank,
- .get_config = samsung_gpio_getcfg_4bit,
- .set_pull = samsung_gpio_setpull_updown,
- .get_pull = samsung_gpio_getpull_updown,
-};
-#endif
-
static struct samsung_gpio_cfg samsung_gpio_cfgs[] = {
[0] = {
.cfg_eint = 0x0,
@@ -708,91 +657,6 @@ static int s3c24xx_gpiolib_banka_output(struct gpio_chip *chip,
}
#endif
-/* The next set of routines are for the case of s5p64x0 bank r */
-
-static int s5p64x0_gpiolib_rbank_input(struct gpio_chip *chip,
- unsigned int offset)
-{
- struct samsung_gpio_chip *ourchip = to_samsung_gpio(chip);
- void __iomem *base = ourchip->base;
- void __iomem *regcon = base;
- unsigned long con;
- unsigned long flags;
-
- switch (offset) {
- case 6:
- offset += 1;
- case 0:
- case 1:
- case 2:
- case 3:
- case 4:
- case 5:
- regcon -= 4;
- break;
- default:
- offset -= 7;
- break;
- }
-
- samsung_gpio_lock(ourchip, flags);
-
- con = __raw_readl(regcon);
- con &= ~(0xf << con_4bit_shift(offset));
- __raw_writel(con, regcon);
-
- samsung_gpio_unlock(ourchip, flags);
-
- return 0;
-}
-
-static int s5p64x0_gpiolib_rbank_output(struct gpio_chip *chip,
- unsigned int offset, int value)
-{
- struct samsung_gpio_chip *ourchip = to_samsung_gpio(chip);
- void __iomem *base = ourchip->base;
- void __iomem *regcon = base;
- unsigned long con;
- unsigned long dat;
- unsigned long flags;
- unsigned con_offset = offset;
-
- switch (con_offset) {
- case 6:
- con_offset += 1;
- case 0:
- case 1:
- case 2:
- case 3:
- case 4:
- case 5:
- regcon -= 4;
- break;
- default:
- con_offset -= 7;
- break;
- }
-
- samsung_gpio_lock(ourchip, flags);
-
- con = __raw_readl(regcon);
- con &= ~(0xf << con_4bit_shift(con_offset));
- con |= 0x1 << con_4bit_shift(con_offset);
-
- dat = __raw_readl(base + GPIODAT_OFF);
- if (value)
- dat |= 1 << offset;
- else
- dat &= ~(1 << offset);
-
- __raw_writel(con, regcon);
- __raw_writel(dat, base + GPIODAT_OFF);
-
- samsung_gpio_unlock(ourchip, flags);
-
- return 0;
-}
-
static void samsung_gpiolib_set(struct gpio_chip *chip,
unsigned offset, int value)
{
@@ -999,20 +863,6 @@ static void __init samsung_gpiolib_add_4bit2_chips(struct samsung_gpio_chip *chi
}
}
-static void __init s5p64x0_gpiolib_add_rbank(struct samsung_gpio_chip *chip,
- int nr_chips)
-{
- for (; nr_chips > 0; nr_chips--, chip++) {
- chip->chip.direction_input = s5p64x0_gpiolib_rbank_input;
- chip->chip.direction_output = s5p64x0_gpiolib_rbank_output;
-
- if (!chip->pm)
- chip->pm = __gpio_pm(&samsung_gpio_pm_4bit);
-
- samsung_gpiolib_add(chip);
- }
-}
-
int samsung_gpiolib_to_irq(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int offset)
{
struct samsung_gpio_chip *samsung_chip = container_of(chip, struct samsung_gpio_chip, chip);
@@ -1320,284 +1170,6 @@ static struct samsung_gpio_chip s3c64xx_gpios_2bit[] = {
};
/*
- * S5P6440 GPIO bank summary:
- *
- * Bank GPIOs Style SlpCon ExtInt Group
- * A 6 4Bit Yes 1
- * B 7 4Bit Yes 1
- * C 8 4Bit Yes 2
- * F 2 2Bit Yes 4 [1]
- * G 7 4Bit Yes 5
- * H 10 4Bit[2] Yes 6
- * I 16 2Bit Yes None
- * J 12 2Bit Yes None
- * N 16 2Bit No IRQ_EINT
- * P 8 2Bit Yes 8
- * R 15 4Bit[2] Yes 8
- */
-
-static struct samsung_gpio_chip s5p6440_gpios_4bit[] = {
-#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_S5P6440
- {
- .chip = {
- .base = S5P6440_GPA(0),
- .ngpio = S5P6440_GPIO_A_NR,
- .label = "GPA",
- },
- }, {
- .chip = {
- .base = S5P6440_GPB(0),
- .ngpio = S5P6440_GPIO_B_NR,
- .label = "GPB",
- },
- }, {
- .chip = {
- .base = S5P6440_GPC(0),
- .ngpio = S5P6440_GPIO_C_NR,
- .label = "GPC",
- },
- }, {
- .base = S5P64X0_GPG_BASE,
- .chip = {
- .base = S5P6440_GPG(0),
- .ngpio = S5P6440_GPIO_G_NR,
- .label = "GPG",
- },
- },
-#endif
-};
-
-static struct samsung_gpio_chip s5p6440_gpios_4bit2[] = {
-#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_S5P6440
- {
- .base = S5P64X0_GPH_BASE + 0x4,
- .chip = {
- .base = S5P6440_GPH(0),
- .ngpio = S5P6440_GPIO_H_NR,
- .label = "GPH",
- },
- },
-#endif
-};
-
-static struct samsung_gpio_chip s5p6440_gpios_rbank[] = {
-#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_S5P6440
- {
- .base = S5P64X0_GPR_BASE + 0x4,
- .config = &s5p64x0_gpio_cfg_rbank,
- .chip = {
- .base = S5P6440_GPR(0),
- .ngpio = S5P6440_GPIO_R_NR,
- .label = "GPR",
- },
- },
-#endif
-};
-
-static struct samsung_gpio_chip s5p6440_gpios_2bit[] = {
-#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_S5P6440
- {
- .base = S5P64X0_GPF_BASE,
- .config = &samsung_gpio_cfgs[6],
- .chip = {
- .base = S5P6440_GPF(0),
- .ngpio = S5P6440_GPIO_F_NR,
- .label = "GPF",
- },
- }, {
- .base = S5P64X0_GPI_BASE,
- .config = &samsung_gpio_cfgs[4],
- .chip = {
- .base = S5P6440_GPI(0),
- .ngpio = S5P6440_GPIO_I_NR,
- .label = "GPI",
- },
- }, {
- .base = S5P64X0_GPJ_BASE,
- .config = &samsung_gpio_cfgs[4],
- .chip = {
- .base = S5P6440_GPJ(0),
- .ngpio = S5P6440_GPIO_J_NR,
- .label = "GPJ",
- },
- }, {
- .base = S5P64X0_GPN_BASE,
- .config = &samsung_gpio_cfgs[5],
- .chip = {
- .base = S5P6440_GPN(0),
- .ngpio = S5P6440_GPIO_N_NR,
- .label = "GPN",
- },
- }, {
- .base = S5P64X0_GPP_BASE,
- .config = &samsung_gpio_cfgs[6],
- .chip = {
- .base = S5P6440_GPP(0),
- .ngpio = S5P6440_GPIO_P_NR,
- .label = "GPP",
- },
- },
-#endif
-};
-
-/*
- * S5P6450 GPIO bank summary:
- *
- * Bank GPIOs Style SlpCon ExtInt Group
- * A 6 4Bit Yes 1
- * B 7 4Bit Yes 1
- * C 8 4Bit Yes 2
- * D 8 4Bit Yes None
- * F 2 2Bit Yes None
- * G 14 4Bit[2] Yes 5
- * H 10 4Bit[2] Yes 6
- * I 16 2Bit Yes None
- * J 12 2Bit Yes None
- * K 5 4Bit Yes None
- * N 16 2Bit No IRQ_EINT
- * P 11 2Bit Yes 8
- * Q 14 2Bit Yes None
- * R 15 4Bit[2] Yes None
- * S 8 2Bit Yes None
- *
- * [1] BANKF pins 14,15 do not form part of the external interrupt sources
- * [2] BANK has two control registers, GPxCON0 and GPxCON1
- */
-
-static struct samsung_gpio_chip s5p6450_gpios_4bit[] = {
-#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_S5P6450
- {
- .chip = {
- .base = S5P6450_GPA(0),
- .ngpio = S5P6450_GPIO_A_NR,
- .label = "GPA",
- },
- }, {
- .chip = {
- .base = S5P6450_GPB(0),
- .ngpio = S5P6450_GPIO_B_NR,
- .label = "GPB",
- },
- }, {
- .chip = {
- .base = S5P6450_GPC(0),
- .ngpio = S5P6450_GPIO_C_NR,
- .label = "GPC",
- },
- }, {
- .chip = {
- .base = S5P6450_GPD(0),
- .ngpio = S5P6450_GPIO_D_NR,
- .label = "GPD",
- },
- }, {
- .base = S5P6450_GPK_BASE,
- .chip = {
- .base = S5P6450_GPK(0),
- .ngpio = S5P6450_GPIO_K_NR,
- .label = "GPK",
- },
- },
-#endif
-};
-
-static struct samsung_gpio_chip s5p6450_gpios_4bit2[] = {
-#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_S5P6450
- {
- .base = S5P64X0_GPG_BASE + 0x4,
- .chip = {
- .base = S5P6450_GPG(0),
- .ngpio = S5P6450_GPIO_G_NR,
- .label = "GPG",
- },
- }, {
- .base = S5P64X0_GPH_BASE + 0x4,
- .chip = {
- .base = S5P6450_GPH(0),
- .ngpio = S5P6450_GPIO_H_NR,
- .label = "GPH",
- },
- },
-#endif
-};
-
-static struct samsung_gpio_chip s5p6450_gpios_rbank[] = {
-#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_S5P6450
- {
- .base = S5P64X0_GPR_BASE + 0x4,
- .config = &s5p64x0_gpio_cfg_rbank,
- .chip = {
- .base = S5P6450_GPR(0),
- .ngpio = S5P6450_GPIO_R_NR,
- .label = "GPR",
- },
- },
-#endif
-};
-
-static struct samsung_gpio_chip s5p6450_gpios_2bit[] = {
-#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_S5P6450
- {
- .base = S5P64X0_GPF_BASE,
- .config = &samsung_gpio_cfgs[6],
- .chip = {
- .base = S5P6450_GPF(0),
- .ngpio = S5P6450_GPIO_F_NR,
- .label = "GPF",
- },
- }, {
- .base = S5P64X0_GPI_BASE,
- .config = &samsung_gpio_cfgs[4],
- .chip = {
- .base = S5P6450_GPI(0),
- .ngpio = S5P6450_GPIO_I_NR,
- .label = "GPI",
- },
- }, {
- .base = S5P64X0_GPJ_BASE,
- .config = &samsung_gpio_cfgs[4],
- .chip = {
- .base = S5P6450_GPJ(0),
- .ngpio = S5P6450_GPIO_J_NR,
- .label = "GPJ",
- },
- }, {
- .base = S5P64X0_GPN_BASE,
- .config = &samsung_gpio_cfgs[5],
- .chip = {
- .base = S5P6450_GPN(0),
- .ngpio = S5P6450_GPIO_N_NR,
- .label = "GPN",
- },
- }, {
- .base = S5P64X0_GPP_BASE,
- .config = &samsung_gpio_cfgs[6],
- .chip = {
- .base = S5P6450_GPP(0),
- .ngpio = S5P6450_GPIO_P_NR,
- .label = "GPP",
- },
- }, {
- .base = S5P6450_GPQ_BASE,
- .config = &samsung_gpio_cfgs[5],
- .chip = {
- .base = S5P6450_GPQ(0),
- .ngpio = S5P6450_GPIO_Q_NR,
- .label = "GPQ",
- },
- }, {
- .base = S5P6450_GPS_BASE,
- .config = &samsung_gpio_cfgs[6],
- .chip = {
- .base = S5P6450_GPS(0),
- .ngpio = S5P6450_GPIO_S_NR,
- .label = "GPS",
- },
- },
-#endif
-};
-
-/*
* S5PC100 GPIO bank summary:
*
* Bank GPIOs Style INT Type
@@ -2109,24 +1681,6 @@ static __init int samsung_gpiolib_init(void)
S3C64XX_VA_GPIO);
samsung_gpiolib_add_4bit2_chips(s3c64xx_gpios_4bit2,
ARRAY_SIZE(s3c64xx_gpios_4bit2));
- } else if (soc_is_s5p6440()) {
- samsung_gpiolib_add_2bit_chips(s5p6440_gpios_2bit,
- ARRAY_SIZE(s5p6440_gpios_2bit), NULL, 0x0);
- samsung_gpiolib_add_4bit_chips(s5p6440_gpios_4bit,
- ARRAY_SIZE(s5p6440_gpios_4bit), S5P_VA_GPIO);
- samsung_gpiolib_add_4bit2_chips(s5p6440_gpios_4bit2,
- ARRAY_SIZE(s5p6440_gpios_4bit2));
- s5p64x0_gpiolib_add_rbank(s5p6440_gpios_rbank,
- ARRAY_SIZE(s5p6440_gpios_rbank));
- } else if (soc_is_s5p6450()) {
- samsung_gpiolib_add_2bit_chips(s5p6450_gpios_2bit,
- ARRAY_SIZE(s5p6450_gpios_2bit), NULL, 0x0);
- samsung_gpiolib_add_4bit_chips(s5p6450_gpios_4bit,
- ARRAY_SIZE(s5p6450_gpios_4bit), S5P_VA_GPIO);
- samsung_gpiolib_add_4bit2_chips(s5p6450_gpios_4bit2,
- ARRAY_SIZE(s5p6450_gpios_4bit2));
- s5p64x0_gpiolib_add_rbank(s5p6450_gpios_rbank,
- ARRAY_SIZE(s5p6450_gpios_rbank));
} else if (soc_is_s5pc100()) {
group = 0;
chip = s5pc100_gpios_4bit;
--
1.7.10.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 83+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 02/17] gpio: samsung: remove s5p64x0 related gpio codes
@ 2014-06-30 21:32 ` Kukjin Kim
0 siblings, 0 replies; 83+ messages in thread
From: Kukjin Kim @ 2014-06-30 21:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
This patch removes gpio codes for s5p6440 and s5p6450 SoCs.
Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
---
drivers/gpio/gpio-samsung.c | 446 -------------------------------------------
1 file changed, 446 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-samsung.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-samsung.c
index 07105ee..d12945c 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-samsung.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-samsung.c
@@ -358,47 +358,6 @@ static unsigned s3c24xx_gpio_getcfg_abank(struct samsung_gpio_chip *chip,
}
#endif
-#if defined(CONFIG_CPU_S5P6440) || defined(CONFIG_CPU_S5P6450)
-static int s5p64x0_gpio_setcfg_rbank(struct samsung_gpio_chip *chip,
- unsigned int off, unsigned int cfg)
-{
- void __iomem *reg = chip->base;
- unsigned int shift;
- u32 con;
-
- switch (off) {
- case 0:
- case 1:
- case 2:
- case 3:
- case 4:
- case 5:
- shift = (off & 7) * 4;
- reg -= 4;
- break;
- case 6:
- shift = ((off + 1) & 7) * 4;
- reg -= 4;
- break;
- default:
- shift = ((off + 1) & 7) * 4;
- break;
- }
-
- if (samsung_gpio_is_cfg_special(cfg)) {
- cfg &= 0xf;
- cfg <<= shift;
- }
-
- con = __raw_readl(reg);
- con &= ~(0xf << shift);
- con |= cfg;
- __raw_writel(con, reg);
-
- return 0;
-}
-#endif
-
static void __init samsung_gpiolib_set_cfg(struct samsung_gpio_cfg *chipcfg,
int nr_chips)
{
@@ -426,16 +385,6 @@ static struct samsung_gpio_cfg s3c24xx_gpiocfg_banka = {
};
#endif
-#if defined(CONFIG_CPU_S5P6440) || defined(CONFIG_CPU_S5P6450)
-static struct samsung_gpio_cfg s5p64x0_gpio_cfg_rbank = {
- .cfg_eint = 0x3,
- .set_config = s5p64x0_gpio_setcfg_rbank,
- .get_config = samsung_gpio_getcfg_4bit,
- .set_pull = samsung_gpio_setpull_updown,
- .get_pull = samsung_gpio_getpull_updown,
-};
-#endif
-
static struct samsung_gpio_cfg samsung_gpio_cfgs[] = {
[0] = {
.cfg_eint = 0x0,
@@ -708,91 +657,6 @@ static int s3c24xx_gpiolib_banka_output(struct gpio_chip *chip,
}
#endif
-/* The next set of routines are for the case of s5p64x0 bank r */
-
-static int s5p64x0_gpiolib_rbank_input(struct gpio_chip *chip,
- unsigned int offset)
-{
- struct samsung_gpio_chip *ourchip = to_samsung_gpio(chip);
- void __iomem *base = ourchip->base;
- void __iomem *regcon = base;
- unsigned long con;
- unsigned long flags;
-
- switch (offset) {
- case 6:
- offset += 1;
- case 0:
- case 1:
- case 2:
- case 3:
- case 4:
- case 5:
- regcon -= 4;
- break;
- default:
- offset -= 7;
- break;
- }
-
- samsung_gpio_lock(ourchip, flags);
-
- con = __raw_readl(regcon);
- con &= ~(0xf << con_4bit_shift(offset));
- __raw_writel(con, regcon);
-
- samsung_gpio_unlock(ourchip, flags);
-
- return 0;
-}
-
-static int s5p64x0_gpiolib_rbank_output(struct gpio_chip *chip,
- unsigned int offset, int value)
-{
- struct samsung_gpio_chip *ourchip = to_samsung_gpio(chip);
- void __iomem *base = ourchip->base;
- void __iomem *regcon = base;
- unsigned long con;
- unsigned long dat;
- unsigned long flags;
- unsigned con_offset = offset;
-
- switch (con_offset) {
- case 6:
- con_offset += 1;
- case 0:
- case 1:
- case 2:
- case 3:
- case 4:
- case 5:
- regcon -= 4;
- break;
- default:
- con_offset -= 7;
- break;
- }
-
- samsung_gpio_lock(ourchip, flags);
-
- con = __raw_readl(regcon);
- con &= ~(0xf << con_4bit_shift(con_offset));
- con |= 0x1 << con_4bit_shift(con_offset);
-
- dat = __raw_readl(base + GPIODAT_OFF);
- if (value)
- dat |= 1 << offset;
- else
- dat &= ~(1 << offset);
-
- __raw_writel(con, regcon);
- __raw_writel(dat, base + GPIODAT_OFF);
-
- samsung_gpio_unlock(ourchip, flags);
-
- return 0;
-}
-
static void samsung_gpiolib_set(struct gpio_chip *chip,
unsigned offset, int value)
{
@@ -999,20 +863,6 @@ static void __init samsung_gpiolib_add_4bit2_chips(struct samsung_gpio_chip *chi
}
}
-static void __init s5p64x0_gpiolib_add_rbank(struct samsung_gpio_chip *chip,
- int nr_chips)
-{
- for (; nr_chips > 0; nr_chips--, chip++) {
- chip->chip.direction_input = s5p64x0_gpiolib_rbank_input;
- chip->chip.direction_output = s5p64x0_gpiolib_rbank_output;
-
- if (!chip->pm)
- chip->pm = __gpio_pm(&samsung_gpio_pm_4bit);
-
- samsung_gpiolib_add(chip);
- }
-}
-
int samsung_gpiolib_to_irq(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int offset)
{
struct samsung_gpio_chip *samsung_chip = container_of(chip, struct samsung_gpio_chip, chip);
@@ -1320,284 +1170,6 @@ static struct samsung_gpio_chip s3c64xx_gpios_2bit[] = {
};
/*
- * S5P6440 GPIO bank summary:
- *
- * Bank GPIOs Style SlpCon ExtInt Group
- * A 6 4Bit Yes 1
- * B 7 4Bit Yes 1
- * C 8 4Bit Yes 2
- * F 2 2Bit Yes 4 [1]
- * G 7 4Bit Yes 5
- * H 10 4Bit[2] Yes 6
- * I 16 2Bit Yes None
- * J 12 2Bit Yes None
- * N 16 2Bit No IRQ_EINT
- * P 8 2Bit Yes 8
- * R 15 4Bit[2] Yes 8
- */
-
-static struct samsung_gpio_chip s5p6440_gpios_4bit[] = {
-#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_S5P6440
- {
- .chip = {
- .base = S5P6440_GPA(0),
- .ngpio = S5P6440_GPIO_A_NR,
- .label = "GPA",
- },
- }, {
- .chip = {
- .base = S5P6440_GPB(0),
- .ngpio = S5P6440_GPIO_B_NR,
- .label = "GPB",
- },
- }, {
- .chip = {
- .base = S5P6440_GPC(0),
- .ngpio = S5P6440_GPIO_C_NR,
- .label = "GPC",
- },
- }, {
- .base = S5P64X0_GPG_BASE,
- .chip = {
- .base = S5P6440_GPG(0),
- .ngpio = S5P6440_GPIO_G_NR,
- .label = "GPG",
- },
- },
-#endif
-};
-
-static struct samsung_gpio_chip s5p6440_gpios_4bit2[] = {
-#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_S5P6440
- {
- .base = S5P64X0_GPH_BASE + 0x4,
- .chip = {
- .base = S5P6440_GPH(0),
- .ngpio = S5P6440_GPIO_H_NR,
- .label = "GPH",
- },
- },
-#endif
-};
-
-static struct samsung_gpio_chip s5p6440_gpios_rbank[] = {
-#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_S5P6440
- {
- .base = S5P64X0_GPR_BASE + 0x4,
- .config = &s5p64x0_gpio_cfg_rbank,
- .chip = {
- .base = S5P6440_GPR(0),
- .ngpio = S5P6440_GPIO_R_NR,
- .label = "GPR",
- },
- },
-#endif
-};
-
-static struct samsung_gpio_chip s5p6440_gpios_2bit[] = {
-#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_S5P6440
- {
- .base = S5P64X0_GPF_BASE,
- .config = &samsung_gpio_cfgs[6],
- .chip = {
- .base = S5P6440_GPF(0),
- .ngpio = S5P6440_GPIO_F_NR,
- .label = "GPF",
- },
- }, {
- .base = S5P64X0_GPI_BASE,
- .config = &samsung_gpio_cfgs[4],
- .chip = {
- .base = S5P6440_GPI(0),
- .ngpio = S5P6440_GPIO_I_NR,
- .label = "GPI",
- },
- }, {
- .base = S5P64X0_GPJ_BASE,
- .config = &samsung_gpio_cfgs[4],
- .chip = {
- .base = S5P6440_GPJ(0),
- .ngpio = S5P6440_GPIO_J_NR,
- .label = "GPJ",
- },
- }, {
- .base = S5P64X0_GPN_BASE,
- .config = &samsung_gpio_cfgs[5],
- .chip = {
- .base = S5P6440_GPN(0),
- .ngpio = S5P6440_GPIO_N_NR,
- .label = "GPN",
- },
- }, {
- .base = S5P64X0_GPP_BASE,
- .config = &samsung_gpio_cfgs[6],
- .chip = {
- .base = S5P6440_GPP(0),
- .ngpio = S5P6440_GPIO_P_NR,
- .label = "GPP",
- },
- },
-#endif
-};
-
-/*
- * S5P6450 GPIO bank summary:
- *
- * Bank GPIOs Style SlpCon ExtInt Group
- * A 6 4Bit Yes 1
- * B 7 4Bit Yes 1
- * C 8 4Bit Yes 2
- * D 8 4Bit Yes None
- * F 2 2Bit Yes None
- * G 14 4Bit[2] Yes 5
- * H 10 4Bit[2] Yes 6
- * I 16 2Bit Yes None
- * J 12 2Bit Yes None
- * K 5 4Bit Yes None
- * N 16 2Bit No IRQ_EINT
- * P 11 2Bit Yes 8
- * Q 14 2Bit Yes None
- * R 15 4Bit[2] Yes None
- * S 8 2Bit Yes None
- *
- * [1] BANKF pins 14,15 do not form part of the external interrupt sources
- * [2] BANK has two control registers, GPxCON0 and GPxCON1
- */
-
-static struct samsung_gpio_chip s5p6450_gpios_4bit[] = {
-#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_S5P6450
- {
- .chip = {
- .base = S5P6450_GPA(0),
- .ngpio = S5P6450_GPIO_A_NR,
- .label = "GPA",
- },
- }, {
- .chip = {
- .base = S5P6450_GPB(0),
- .ngpio = S5P6450_GPIO_B_NR,
- .label = "GPB",
- },
- }, {
- .chip = {
- .base = S5P6450_GPC(0),
- .ngpio = S5P6450_GPIO_C_NR,
- .label = "GPC",
- },
- }, {
- .chip = {
- .base = S5P6450_GPD(0),
- .ngpio = S5P6450_GPIO_D_NR,
- .label = "GPD",
- },
- }, {
- .base = S5P6450_GPK_BASE,
- .chip = {
- .base = S5P6450_GPK(0),
- .ngpio = S5P6450_GPIO_K_NR,
- .label = "GPK",
- },
- },
-#endif
-};
-
-static struct samsung_gpio_chip s5p6450_gpios_4bit2[] = {
-#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_S5P6450
- {
- .base = S5P64X0_GPG_BASE + 0x4,
- .chip = {
- .base = S5P6450_GPG(0),
- .ngpio = S5P6450_GPIO_G_NR,
- .label = "GPG",
- },
- }, {
- .base = S5P64X0_GPH_BASE + 0x4,
- .chip = {
- .base = S5P6450_GPH(0),
- .ngpio = S5P6450_GPIO_H_NR,
- .label = "GPH",
- },
- },
-#endif
-};
-
-static struct samsung_gpio_chip s5p6450_gpios_rbank[] = {
-#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_S5P6450
- {
- .base = S5P64X0_GPR_BASE + 0x4,
- .config = &s5p64x0_gpio_cfg_rbank,
- .chip = {
- .base = S5P6450_GPR(0),
- .ngpio = S5P6450_GPIO_R_NR,
- .label = "GPR",
- },
- },
-#endif
-};
-
-static struct samsung_gpio_chip s5p6450_gpios_2bit[] = {
-#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_S5P6450
- {
- .base = S5P64X0_GPF_BASE,
- .config = &samsung_gpio_cfgs[6],
- .chip = {
- .base = S5P6450_GPF(0),
- .ngpio = S5P6450_GPIO_F_NR,
- .label = "GPF",
- },
- }, {
- .base = S5P64X0_GPI_BASE,
- .config = &samsung_gpio_cfgs[4],
- .chip = {
- .base = S5P6450_GPI(0),
- .ngpio = S5P6450_GPIO_I_NR,
- .label = "GPI",
- },
- }, {
- .base = S5P64X0_GPJ_BASE,
- .config = &samsung_gpio_cfgs[4],
- .chip = {
- .base = S5P6450_GPJ(0),
- .ngpio = S5P6450_GPIO_J_NR,
- .label = "GPJ",
- },
- }, {
- .base = S5P64X0_GPN_BASE,
- .config = &samsung_gpio_cfgs[5],
- .chip = {
- .base = S5P6450_GPN(0),
- .ngpio = S5P6450_GPIO_N_NR,
- .label = "GPN",
- },
- }, {
- .base = S5P64X0_GPP_BASE,
- .config = &samsung_gpio_cfgs[6],
- .chip = {
- .base = S5P6450_GPP(0),
- .ngpio = S5P6450_GPIO_P_NR,
- .label = "GPP",
- },
- }, {
- .base = S5P6450_GPQ_BASE,
- .config = &samsung_gpio_cfgs[5],
- .chip = {
- .base = S5P6450_GPQ(0),
- .ngpio = S5P6450_GPIO_Q_NR,
- .label = "GPQ",
- },
- }, {
- .base = S5P6450_GPS_BASE,
- .config = &samsung_gpio_cfgs[6],
- .chip = {
- .base = S5P6450_GPS(0),
- .ngpio = S5P6450_GPIO_S_NR,
- .label = "GPS",
- },
- },
-#endif
-};
-
-/*
* S5PC100 GPIO bank summary:
*
* Bank GPIOs Style INT Type
@@ -2109,24 +1681,6 @@ static __init int samsung_gpiolib_init(void)
S3C64XX_VA_GPIO);
samsung_gpiolib_add_4bit2_chips(s3c64xx_gpios_4bit2,
ARRAY_SIZE(s3c64xx_gpios_4bit2));
- } else if (soc_is_s5p6440()) {
- samsung_gpiolib_add_2bit_chips(s5p6440_gpios_2bit,
- ARRAY_SIZE(s5p6440_gpios_2bit), NULL, 0x0);
- samsung_gpiolib_add_4bit_chips(s5p6440_gpios_4bit,
- ARRAY_SIZE(s5p6440_gpios_4bit), S5P_VA_GPIO);
- samsung_gpiolib_add_4bit2_chips(s5p6440_gpios_4bit2,
- ARRAY_SIZE(s5p6440_gpios_4bit2));
- s5p64x0_gpiolib_add_rbank(s5p6440_gpios_rbank,
- ARRAY_SIZE(s5p6440_gpios_rbank));
- } else if (soc_is_s5p6450()) {
- samsung_gpiolib_add_2bit_chips(s5p6450_gpios_2bit,
- ARRAY_SIZE(s5p6450_gpios_2bit), NULL, 0x0);
- samsung_gpiolib_add_4bit_chips(s5p6450_gpios_4bit,
- ARRAY_SIZE(s5p6450_gpios_4bit), S5P_VA_GPIO);
- samsung_gpiolib_add_4bit2_chips(s5p6450_gpios_4bit2,
- ARRAY_SIZE(s5p6450_gpios_4bit2));
- s5p64x0_gpiolib_add_rbank(s5p6450_gpios_rbank,
- ARRAY_SIZE(s5p6450_gpios_rbank));
} else if (soc_is_s5pc100()) {
group = 0;
chip = s5pc100_gpios_4bit;
--
1.7.10.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 83+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 03/17] spi: s3c64xx: remove s5p64x0 related spi codes
2014-06-30 21:32 ` Kukjin Kim
@ 2014-06-30 21:32 ` Kukjin Kim
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 83+ messages in thread
From: Kukjin Kim @ 2014-06-30 21:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel, linux-samsung-soc; +Cc: Kukjin Kim, Mark Brown
This patch removes s5p64x0 related spi because of no more support for
s5p64x0 SoCs. Meanwhile, cleanup SPI DT bindings for s5p6440-spi, it
should be s5p64x0-spi instead.
Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@linaro.org>
---
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-samsung.txt | 1 -
drivers/spi/spi-s3c64xx.c | 9 ---------
2 files changed, 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-samsung.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-samsung.txt
index 86aa061..fe6f903 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-samsung.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-samsung.txt
@@ -8,7 +8,6 @@ Required SoC Specific Properties:
- compatible: should be one of the following.
- samsung,s3c2443-spi: for s3c2443, s3c2416 and s3c2450 platforms
- samsung,s3c6410-spi: for s3c6410 platforms
- - samsung,s5p6440-spi: for s5p6440 and s5p6450 platforms
- samsung,s5pv210-spi: for s5pv210 and s5pc110 platforms
- samsung,exynos4210-spi: for exynos4 and exynos5 platforms
diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-s3c64xx.c b/drivers/spi/spi-s3c64xx.c
index 75a5696..4a1890a 100644
--- a/drivers/spi/spi-s3c64xx.c
+++ b/drivers/spi/spi-s3c64xx.c
@@ -1323,12 +1323,6 @@ static struct s3c64xx_spi_port_config s3c6410_spi_port_config = {
.tx_st_done = 21,
};
-static struct s3c64xx_spi_port_config s5p64x0_spi_port_config = {
- .fifo_lvl_mask = { 0x1ff, 0x7F },
- .rx_lvl_offset = 15,
- .tx_st_done = 25,
-};
-
static struct s3c64xx_spi_port_config s5pc100_spi_port_config = {
.fifo_lvl_mask = { 0x7f, 0x7F },
.rx_lvl_offset = 13,
@@ -1368,9 +1362,6 @@ static struct platform_device_id s3c64xx_spi_driver_ids[] = {
.name = "s3c6410-spi",
.driver_data = (kernel_ulong_t)&s3c6410_spi_port_config,
}, {
- .name = "s5p64x0-spi",
- .driver_data = (kernel_ulong_t)&s5p64x0_spi_port_config,
- }, {
.name = "s5pc100-spi",
.driver_data = (kernel_ulong_t)&s5pc100_spi_port_config,
}, {
--
1.7.10.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 83+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 03/17] spi: s3c64xx: remove s5p64x0 related spi codes
@ 2014-06-30 21:32 ` Kukjin Kim
0 siblings, 0 replies; 83+ messages in thread
From: Kukjin Kim @ 2014-06-30 21:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
This patch removes s5p64x0 related spi because of no more support for
s5p64x0 SoCs. Meanwhile, cleanup SPI DT bindings for s5p6440-spi, it
should be s5p64x0-spi instead.
Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@linaro.org>
---
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-samsung.txt | 1 -
drivers/spi/spi-s3c64xx.c | 9 ---------
2 files changed, 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-samsung.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-samsung.txt
index 86aa061..fe6f903 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-samsung.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-samsung.txt
@@ -8,7 +8,6 @@ Required SoC Specific Properties:
- compatible: should be one of the following.
- samsung,s3c2443-spi: for s3c2443, s3c2416 and s3c2450 platforms
- samsung,s3c6410-spi: for s3c6410 platforms
- - samsung,s5p6440-spi: for s5p6440 and s5p6450 platforms
- samsung,s5pv210-spi: for s5pv210 and s5pc110 platforms
- samsung,exynos4210-spi: for exynos4 and exynos5 platforms
diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-s3c64xx.c b/drivers/spi/spi-s3c64xx.c
index 75a5696..4a1890a 100644
--- a/drivers/spi/spi-s3c64xx.c
+++ b/drivers/spi/spi-s3c64xx.c
@@ -1323,12 +1323,6 @@ static struct s3c64xx_spi_port_config s3c6410_spi_port_config = {
.tx_st_done = 21,
};
-static struct s3c64xx_spi_port_config s5p64x0_spi_port_config = {
- .fifo_lvl_mask = { 0x1ff, 0x7F },
- .rx_lvl_offset = 15,
- .tx_st_done = 25,
-};
-
static struct s3c64xx_spi_port_config s5pc100_spi_port_config = {
.fifo_lvl_mask = { 0x7f, 0x7F },
.rx_lvl_offset = 13,
@@ -1368,9 +1362,6 @@ static struct platform_device_id s3c64xx_spi_driver_ids[] = {
.name = "s3c6410-spi",
.driver_data = (kernel_ulong_t)&s3c6410_spi_port_config,
}, {
- .name = "s5p64x0-spi",
- .driver_data = (kernel_ulong_t)&s5p64x0_spi_port_config,
- }, {
.name = "s5pc100-spi",
.driver_data = (kernel_ulong_t)&s5pc100_spi_port_config,
}, {
--
1.7.10.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 83+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 04/17] ASoC: samsung: no more support for S5P6440 and S5P6450 SoCs
2014-06-30 21:32 ` Kukjin Kim
@ 2014-06-30 21:32 ` Kukjin Kim
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 83+ messages in thread
From: Kukjin Kim @ 2014-06-30 21:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel, linux-samsung-soc; +Cc: Kukjin Kim, Mark Brown
This patch removes s5p64x0 related WM8580 because of removing support
for s5p64x0 SoCs.
Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@linaro.org>
---
sound/soc/samsung/Kconfig | 2 +-
sound/soc/samsung/smdk_wm8580pcm.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/samsung/Kconfig b/sound/soc/samsung/Kconfig
index 753b8c9..c639e2e 100644
--- a/sound/soc/samsung/Kconfig
+++ b/sound/soc/samsung/Kconfig
@@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ config SND_SOC_SAMSUNG_JIVE_WM8750
config SND_SOC_SAMSUNG_SMDK_WM8580
tristate "SoC I2S Audio support for WM8580 on SMDK"
- depends on SND_SOC_SAMSUNG && (MACH_SMDK6410 || MACH_SMDKC100 || MACH_SMDK6440 || MACH_SMDK6450 || MACH_SMDKV210 || MACH_SMDKC110)
+ depends on SND_SOC_SAMSUNG && (MACH_SMDK6410 || MACH_SMDKC100 || MACH_SMDKV210 || MACH_SMDKC110)
depends on REGMAP_I2C
select SND_SOC_WM8580
select SND_SAMSUNG_I2S
diff --git a/sound/soc/samsung/smdk_wm8580pcm.c b/sound/soc/samsung/smdk_wm8580pcm.c
index e119aaa..63d0793 100644
--- a/sound/soc/samsung/smdk_wm8580pcm.c
+++ b/sound/soc/samsung/smdk_wm8580pcm.c
@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@
* o '0' means 'OFF'
* o 'X' means 'Don't care'
*
- * SMDK6410, SMDK6440, SMDK6450 Base B/D: CFG1-0000, CFG2-1111
+ * SMDK6410 Base B/D: CFG1-0000, CFG2-1111
* SMDKC110, SMDKV210: CFGB11-100100, CFGB12-0000
*/
--
1.7.10.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 83+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 04/17] ASoC: samsung: no more support for S5P6440 and S5P6450 SoCs
@ 2014-06-30 21:32 ` Kukjin Kim
0 siblings, 0 replies; 83+ messages in thread
From: Kukjin Kim @ 2014-06-30 21:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
This patch removes s5p64x0 related WM8580 because of removing support
for s5p64x0 SoCs.
Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@linaro.org>
---
sound/soc/samsung/Kconfig | 2 +-
sound/soc/samsung/smdk_wm8580pcm.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/samsung/Kconfig b/sound/soc/samsung/Kconfig
index 753b8c9..c639e2e 100644
--- a/sound/soc/samsung/Kconfig
+++ b/sound/soc/samsung/Kconfig
@@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ config SND_SOC_SAMSUNG_JIVE_WM8750
config SND_SOC_SAMSUNG_SMDK_WM8580
tristate "SoC I2S Audio support for WM8580 on SMDK"
- depends on SND_SOC_SAMSUNG && (MACH_SMDK6410 || MACH_SMDKC100 || MACH_SMDK6440 || MACH_SMDK6450 || MACH_SMDKV210 || MACH_SMDKC110)
+ depends on SND_SOC_SAMSUNG && (MACH_SMDK6410 || MACH_SMDKC100 || MACH_SMDKV210 || MACH_SMDKC110)
depends on REGMAP_I2C
select SND_SOC_WM8580
select SND_SAMSUNG_I2S
diff --git a/sound/soc/samsung/smdk_wm8580pcm.c b/sound/soc/samsung/smdk_wm8580pcm.c
index e119aaa..63d0793 100644
--- a/sound/soc/samsung/smdk_wm8580pcm.c
+++ b/sound/soc/samsung/smdk_wm8580pcm.c
@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@
* o '0' means 'OFF'
* o 'X' means 'Don't care'
*
- * SMDK6410, SMDK6440, SMDK6450 Base B/D: CFG1-0000, CFG2-1111
+ * SMDK6410 Base B/D: CFG1-0000, CFG2-1111
* SMDKC110, SMDKV210: CFGB11-100100, CFGB12-0000
*/
--
1.7.10.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 83+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 05/17] pwm: samsung: remove s5p64x0 related pwm codes
2014-06-30 21:32 ` Kukjin Kim
@ 2014-06-30 21:32 ` Kukjin Kim
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 83+ messages in thread
From: Kukjin Kim @ 2014-06-30 21:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel, linux-samsung-soc; +Cc: Kukjin Kim, Thierry Reding
This patch removes supporting s5p64x0 related pwm codes because of
no more support for S5P6440 and S5P6450 SoCs. And this patch changes
the name of s5p6440-pwm to exynos-pwm instead.
Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
---
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-samsung.txt | 1 -
arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210-universal_c210.dts | 2 +-
drivers/clocksource/samsung_pwm_timer.c | 13 -------------
drivers/pwm/pwm-samsung.c | 5 ++---
4 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-samsung.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-samsung.txt
index 5538de9..43925d3 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-samsung.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-samsung.txt
@@ -11,7 +11,6 @@ Required properties:
- compatible : should be one of following:
samsung,s3c2410-pwm - for 16-bit timers present on S3C24xx SoCs
samsung,s3c6400-pwm - for 32-bit timers present on S3C64xx SoCs
- samsung,s5p6440-pwm - for 32-bit timers present on S5P64x0 SoCs
samsung,s5pc100-pwm - for 32-bit timers present on S5PC100, S5PV210,
Exynos4210 rev0 SoCs
samsung,exynos4210-pwm - for 32-bit timers present on Exynos4210,
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210-universal_c210.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210-universal_c210.dts
index d50eb3a..0ca26e0 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210-universal_c210.dts
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210-universal_c210.dts
@@ -461,7 +461,7 @@
};
pwm@139D0000 {
- compatible = "samsung,s5p6440-pwm";
+ compatible = "samsung,exynos4210-pwm";
status = "okay";
};
diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/samsung_pwm_timer.c b/drivers/clocksource/samsung_pwm_timer.c
index 5645cfc..e35a9b7 100644
--- a/drivers/clocksource/samsung_pwm_timer.c
+++ b/drivers/clocksource/samsung_pwm_timer.c
@@ -480,19 +480,6 @@ static void __init s3c64xx_pwm_clocksource_init(struct device_node *np)
}
CLOCKSOURCE_OF_DECLARE(s3c6400_pwm, "samsung,s3c6400-pwm", s3c64xx_pwm_clocksource_init);
-static const struct samsung_pwm_variant s5p64x0_variant = {
- .bits = 32,
- .div_base = 0,
- .has_tint_cstat = true,
- .tclk_mask = 0,
-};
-
-static void __init s5p64x0_pwm_clocksource_init(struct device_node *np)
-{
- samsung_pwm_alloc(np, &s5p64x0_variant);
-}
-CLOCKSOURCE_OF_DECLARE(s5p6440_pwm, "samsung,s5p6440-pwm", s5p64x0_pwm_clocksource_init);
-
static const struct samsung_pwm_variant s5p_variant = {
.bits = 32,
.div_base = 0,
diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-samsung.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-samsung.c
index ba6b650..68f3471 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-samsung.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-samsung.c
@@ -404,7 +404,7 @@ static const struct samsung_pwm_variant s3c64xx_variant = {
.tclk_mask = BIT(7) | BIT(6) | BIT(5),
};
-static const struct samsung_pwm_variant s5p64x0_variant = {
+static const struct samsung_pwm_variant exynos4210_variant = {
.bits = 32,
.div_base = 0,
.has_tint_cstat = true,
@@ -421,9 +421,8 @@ static const struct samsung_pwm_variant s5pc100_variant = {
static const struct of_device_id samsung_pwm_matches[] = {
{ .compatible = "samsung,s3c2410-pwm", .data = &s3c24xx_variant },
{ .compatible = "samsung,s3c6400-pwm", .data = &s3c64xx_variant },
- { .compatible = "samsung,s5p6440-pwm", .data = &s5p64x0_variant },
{ .compatible = "samsung,s5pc100-pwm", .data = &s5pc100_variant },
- { .compatible = "samsung,exynos4210-pwm", .data = &s5p64x0_variant },
+ { .compatible = "samsung,exynos4210-pwm", .data = &exynos4210_variant },
{},
};
--
1.7.10.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 83+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 05/17] pwm: samsung: remove s5p64x0 related pwm codes
@ 2014-06-30 21:32 ` Kukjin Kim
0 siblings, 0 replies; 83+ messages in thread
From: Kukjin Kim @ 2014-06-30 21:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
This patch removes supporting s5p64x0 related pwm codes because of
no more support for S5P6440 and S5P6450 SoCs. And this patch changes
the name of s5p6440-pwm to exynos-pwm instead.
Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
---
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-samsung.txt | 1 -
arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210-universal_c210.dts | 2 +-
drivers/clocksource/samsung_pwm_timer.c | 13 -------------
drivers/pwm/pwm-samsung.c | 5 ++---
4 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-samsung.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-samsung.txt
index 5538de9..43925d3 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-samsung.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-samsung.txt
@@ -11,7 +11,6 @@ Required properties:
- compatible : should be one of following:
samsung,s3c2410-pwm - for 16-bit timers present on S3C24xx SoCs
samsung,s3c6400-pwm - for 32-bit timers present on S3C64xx SoCs
- samsung,s5p6440-pwm - for 32-bit timers present on S5P64x0 SoCs
samsung,s5pc100-pwm - for 32-bit timers present on S5PC100, S5PV210,
Exynos4210 rev0 SoCs
samsung,exynos4210-pwm - for 32-bit timers present on Exynos4210,
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210-universal_c210.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210-universal_c210.dts
index d50eb3a..0ca26e0 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210-universal_c210.dts
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210-universal_c210.dts
@@ -461,7 +461,7 @@
};
pwm at 139D0000 {
- compatible = "samsung,s5p6440-pwm";
+ compatible = "samsung,exynos4210-pwm";
status = "okay";
};
diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/samsung_pwm_timer.c b/drivers/clocksource/samsung_pwm_timer.c
index 5645cfc..e35a9b7 100644
--- a/drivers/clocksource/samsung_pwm_timer.c
+++ b/drivers/clocksource/samsung_pwm_timer.c
@@ -480,19 +480,6 @@ static void __init s3c64xx_pwm_clocksource_init(struct device_node *np)
}
CLOCKSOURCE_OF_DECLARE(s3c6400_pwm, "samsung,s3c6400-pwm", s3c64xx_pwm_clocksource_init);
-static const struct samsung_pwm_variant s5p64x0_variant = {
- .bits = 32,
- .div_base = 0,
- .has_tint_cstat = true,
- .tclk_mask = 0,
-};
-
-static void __init s5p64x0_pwm_clocksource_init(struct device_node *np)
-{
- samsung_pwm_alloc(np, &s5p64x0_variant);
-}
-CLOCKSOURCE_OF_DECLARE(s5p6440_pwm, "samsung,s5p6440-pwm", s5p64x0_pwm_clocksource_init);
-
static const struct samsung_pwm_variant s5p_variant = {
.bits = 32,
.div_base = 0,
diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-samsung.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-samsung.c
index ba6b650..68f3471 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-samsung.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-samsung.c
@@ -404,7 +404,7 @@ static const struct samsung_pwm_variant s3c64xx_variant = {
.tclk_mask = BIT(7) | BIT(6) | BIT(5),
};
-static const struct samsung_pwm_variant s5p64x0_variant = {
+static const struct samsung_pwm_variant exynos4210_variant = {
.bits = 32,
.div_base = 0,
.has_tint_cstat = true,
@@ -421,9 +421,8 @@ static const struct samsung_pwm_variant s5pc100_variant = {
static const struct of_device_id samsung_pwm_matches[] = {
{ .compatible = "samsung,s3c2410-pwm", .data = &s3c24xx_variant },
{ .compatible = "samsung,s3c6400-pwm", .data = &s3c64xx_variant },
- { .compatible = "samsung,s5p6440-pwm", .data = &s5p64x0_variant },
{ .compatible = "samsung,s5pc100-pwm", .data = &s5pc100_variant },
- { .compatible = "samsung,exynos4210-pwm", .data = &s5p64x0_variant },
+ { .compatible = "samsung,exynos4210-pwm", .data = &exynos4210_variant },
{},
};
--
1.7.10.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 83+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 06/17] video: fbdev: s3c-fb: remove s5p64x0 related fimd codes
2014-06-30 21:32 ` Kukjin Kim
@ 2014-06-30 21:32 ` Kukjin Kim
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 83+ messages in thread
From: Kukjin Kim @ 2014-06-30 21:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel, linux-samsung-soc; +Cc: Kukjin Kim, Tomi Valkeinen
This patch removes fimd codes for s5p6440 and s5p6450 SoCs.
Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
Cc: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>
---
.../devicetree/bindings/video/samsung-fimd.txt | 1 -
drivers/video/fbdev/Kconfig | 2 +-
drivers/video/fbdev/s3c-fb.c | 30 --------------------
3 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 32 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/video/samsung-fimd.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/video/samsung-fimd.txt
index 2dad41b..741f4a6 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/video/samsung-fimd.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/video/samsung-fimd.txt
@@ -8,7 +8,6 @@ Required properties:
- compatible: value should be one of the following
"samsung,s3c2443-fimd"; /* for S3C24XX SoCs */
"samsung,s3c6400-fimd"; /* for S3C64XX SoCs */
- "samsung,s5p6440-fimd"; /* for S5P64X0 SoCs */
"samsung,s5pc100-fimd"; /* for S5PC100 SoC */
"samsung,s5pv210-fimd"; /* for S5PV210 SoC */
"samsung,exynos4210-fimd"; /* for Exynos4 SoCs */
diff --git a/drivers/video/fbdev/Kconfig b/drivers/video/fbdev/Kconfig
index 59c98bfd..11506e5 100644
--- a/drivers/video/fbdev/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/video/fbdev/Kconfig
@@ -2018,7 +2018,7 @@ config FB_TMIO_ACCELL
config FB_S3C
tristate "Samsung S3C framebuffer support"
- depends on FB && (CPU_S3C2416 || ARCH_S3C64XX || ARCH_S5P64X0 || \
+ depends on FB && (CPU_S3C2416 || ARCH_S3C64XX || \
ARCH_S5PC100 || ARCH_S5PV210 || ARCH_EXYNOS)
select FB_CFB_FILLRECT
select FB_CFB_COPYAREA
diff --git a/drivers/video/fbdev/s3c-fb.c b/drivers/video/fbdev/s3c-fb.c
index 62acae2..a0cde41 100644
--- a/drivers/video/fbdev/s3c-fb.c
+++ b/drivers/video/fbdev/s3c-fb.c
@@ -1970,33 +1970,6 @@ static struct s3c_fb_driverdata s3c_fb_data_s3c2443 = {
},
};
-static struct s3c_fb_driverdata s3c_fb_data_s5p64x0 = {
- .variant = {
- .nr_windows = 3,
- .vidtcon = VIDTCON0,
- .wincon = WINCON(0),
- .winmap = WINxMAP(0),
- .keycon = WKEYCON,
- .osd = VIDOSD_BASE,
- .osd_stride = 16,
- .buf_start = VIDW_BUF_START(0),
- .buf_size = VIDW_BUF_SIZE(0),
- .buf_end = VIDW_BUF_END(0),
-
- .palette = {
- [0] = 0x2400,
- [1] = 0x2800,
- [2] = 0x2c00,
- },
-
- .has_blendcon = 1,
- .has_fixvclk = 1,
- },
- .win[0] = &s3c_fb_data_s5p_wins[0],
- .win[1] = &s3c_fb_data_s5p_wins[1],
- .win[2] = &s3c_fb_data_s5p_wins[2],
-};
-
static struct platform_device_id s3c_fb_driver_ids[] = {
{
.name = "s3c-fb",
@@ -2016,9 +1989,6 @@ static struct platform_device_id s3c_fb_driver_ids[] = {
}, {
.name = "s3c2443-fb",
.driver_data = (unsigned long)&s3c_fb_data_s3c2443,
- }, {
- .name = "s5p64x0-fb",
- .driver_data = (unsigned long)&s3c_fb_data_s5p64x0,
},
{},
};
--
1.7.10.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 83+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 06/17] video: fbdev: s3c-fb: remove s5p64x0 related fimd codes
@ 2014-06-30 21:32 ` Kukjin Kim
0 siblings, 0 replies; 83+ messages in thread
From: Kukjin Kim @ 2014-06-30 21:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
This patch removes fimd codes for s5p6440 and s5p6450 SoCs.
Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
Cc: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>
---
.../devicetree/bindings/video/samsung-fimd.txt | 1 -
drivers/video/fbdev/Kconfig | 2 +-
drivers/video/fbdev/s3c-fb.c | 30 --------------------
3 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 32 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/video/samsung-fimd.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/video/samsung-fimd.txt
index 2dad41b..741f4a6 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/video/samsung-fimd.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/video/samsung-fimd.txt
@@ -8,7 +8,6 @@ Required properties:
- compatible: value should be one of the following
"samsung,s3c2443-fimd"; /* for S3C24XX SoCs */
"samsung,s3c6400-fimd"; /* for S3C64XX SoCs */
- "samsung,s5p6440-fimd"; /* for S5P64X0 SoCs */
"samsung,s5pc100-fimd"; /* for S5PC100 SoC */
"samsung,s5pv210-fimd"; /* for S5PV210 SoC */
"samsung,exynos4210-fimd"; /* for Exynos4 SoCs */
diff --git a/drivers/video/fbdev/Kconfig b/drivers/video/fbdev/Kconfig
index 59c98bfd..11506e5 100644
--- a/drivers/video/fbdev/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/video/fbdev/Kconfig
@@ -2018,7 +2018,7 @@ config FB_TMIO_ACCELL
config FB_S3C
tristate "Samsung S3C framebuffer support"
- depends on FB && (CPU_S3C2416 || ARCH_S3C64XX || ARCH_S5P64X0 || \
+ depends on FB && (CPU_S3C2416 || ARCH_S3C64XX || \
ARCH_S5PC100 || ARCH_S5PV210 || ARCH_EXYNOS)
select FB_CFB_FILLRECT
select FB_CFB_COPYAREA
diff --git a/drivers/video/fbdev/s3c-fb.c b/drivers/video/fbdev/s3c-fb.c
index 62acae2..a0cde41 100644
--- a/drivers/video/fbdev/s3c-fb.c
+++ b/drivers/video/fbdev/s3c-fb.c
@@ -1970,33 +1970,6 @@ static struct s3c_fb_driverdata s3c_fb_data_s3c2443 = {
},
};
-static struct s3c_fb_driverdata s3c_fb_data_s5p64x0 = {
- .variant = {
- .nr_windows = 3,
- .vidtcon = VIDTCON0,
- .wincon = WINCON(0),
- .winmap = WINxMAP(0),
- .keycon = WKEYCON,
- .osd = VIDOSD_BASE,
- .osd_stride = 16,
- .buf_start = VIDW_BUF_START(0),
- .buf_size = VIDW_BUF_SIZE(0),
- .buf_end = VIDW_BUF_END(0),
-
- .palette = {
- [0] = 0x2400,
- [1] = 0x2800,
- [2] = 0x2c00,
- },
-
- .has_blendcon = 1,
- .has_fixvclk = 1,
- },
- .win[0] = &s3c_fb_data_s5p_wins[0],
- .win[1] = &s3c_fb_data_s5p_wins[1],
- .win[2] = &s3c_fb_data_s5p_wins[2],
-};
-
static struct platform_device_id s3c_fb_driver_ids[] = {
{
.name = "s3c-fb",
@@ -2016,9 +1989,6 @@ static struct platform_device_id s3c_fb_driver_ids[] = {
}, {
.name = "s3c2443-fb",
.driver_data = (unsigned long)&s3c_fb_data_s3c2443,
- }, {
- .name = "s5p64x0-fb",
- .driver_data = (unsigned long)&s3c_fb_data_s5p64x0,
},
{},
};
--
1.7.10.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 83+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 07/17] serial: samsung: no more support for S5P6440 and S5P6450 SoCs
2014-06-30 21:32 ` Kukjin Kim
@ 2014-06-30 21:32 ` Kukjin Kim
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 83+ messages in thread
From: Kukjin Kim @ 2014-06-30 21:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel, linux-samsung-soc; +Cc: Kukjin Kim, Greg Kroah-Hartman
This patch removes s5p64x0 related serial because of removing
support for s5p64x0 SoCs.
Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/tty/serial/Kconfig | 1 -
drivers/tty/serial/samsung.c | 1 -
2 files changed, 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/Kconfig b/drivers/tty/serial/Kconfig
index fb57159..7039238 100644
--- a/drivers/tty/serial/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/tty/serial/Kconfig
@@ -238,7 +238,6 @@ config SERIAL_SAMSUNG_UARTS_4
config SERIAL_SAMSUNG_UARTS
int
depends on PLAT_SAMSUNG
- default 6 if CPU_S5P6450
default 4 if SERIAL_SAMSUNG_UARTS_4 || CPU_S3C2416
default 3
help
diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/samsung.c b/drivers/tty/serial/samsung.c
index c1d3ebd..39b1219 100644
--- a/drivers/tty/serial/samsung.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/serial/samsung.c
@@ -1713,7 +1713,6 @@ static struct s3c24xx_serial_drv_data s3c2440_serial_drv_data = {
#endif
#if defined(CONFIG_CPU_S3C6400) || defined(CONFIG_CPU_S3C6410) || \
- defined(CONFIG_CPU_S5P6440) || defined(CONFIG_CPU_S5P6450) || \
defined(CONFIG_CPU_S5PC100)
static struct s3c24xx_serial_drv_data s3c6400_serial_drv_data = {
.info = &(struct s3c24xx_uart_info) {
--
1.7.10.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 83+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 07/17] serial: samsung: no more support for S5P6440 and S5P6450 SoCs
@ 2014-06-30 21:32 ` Kukjin Kim
0 siblings, 0 replies; 83+ messages in thread
From: Kukjin Kim @ 2014-06-30 21:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
This patch removes s5p64x0 related serial because of removing
support for s5p64x0 SoCs.
Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/tty/serial/Kconfig | 1 -
drivers/tty/serial/samsung.c | 1 -
2 files changed, 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/Kconfig b/drivers/tty/serial/Kconfig
index fb57159..7039238 100644
--- a/drivers/tty/serial/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/tty/serial/Kconfig
@@ -238,7 +238,6 @@ config SERIAL_SAMSUNG_UARTS_4
config SERIAL_SAMSUNG_UARTS
int
depends on PLAT_SAMSUNG
- default 6 if CPU_S5P6450
default 4 if SERIAL_SAMSUNG_UARTS_4 || CPU_S3C2416
default 3
help
diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/samsung.c b/drivers/tty/serial/samsung.c
index c1d3ebd..39b1219 100644
--- a/drivers/tty/serial/samsung.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/serial/samsung.c
@@ -1713,7 +1713,6 @@ static struct s3c24xx_serial_drv_data s3c2440_serial_drv_data = {
#endif
#if defined(CONFIG_CPU_S3C6400) || defined(CONFIG_CPU_S3C6410) || \
- defined(CONFIG_CPU_S5P6440) || defined(CONFIG_CPU_S5P6450) || \
defined(CONFIG_CPU_S5PC100)
static struct s3c24xx_serial_drv_data s3c6400_serial_drv_data = {
.info = &(struct s3c24xx_uart_info) {
--
1.7.10.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 83+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 09/17] gpio: samsung: remov s5pc100 related gpio codes
2014-06-30 21:32 ` Kukjin Kim
@ 2014-06-30 21:32 ` Kukjin Kim
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 83+ messages in thread
From: Kukjin Kim @ 2014-06-30 21:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel, linux-samsung-soc; +Cc: Kukjin Kim, Linus Walleij
This patch removes gpio codes for s5pc100 SoC.
Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
---
drivers/gpio/gpio-samsung.c | 276 -------------------------------------------
1 file changed, 276 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-samsung.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-samsung.c
index d12945c..7d4281e 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-samsung.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-samsung.c
@@ -1170,267 +1170,6 @@ static struct samsung_gpio_chip s3c64xx_gpios_2bit[] = {
};
/*
- * S5PC100 GPIO bank summary:
- *
- * Bank GPIOs Style INT Type
- * A0 8 4Bit GPIO_INT0
- * A1 5 4Bit GPIO_INT1
- * B 8 4Bit GPIO_INT2
- * C 5 4Bit GPIO_INT3
- * D 7 4Bit GPIO_INT4
- * E0 8 4Bit GPIO_INT5
- * E1 6 4Bit GPIO_INT6
- * F0 8 4Bit GPIO_INT7
- * F1 8 4Bit GPIO_INT8
- * F2 8 4Bit GPIO_INT9
- * F3 4 4Bit GPIO_INT10
- * G0 8 4Bit GPIO_INT11
- * G1 3 4Bit GPIO_INT12
- * G2 7 4Bit GPIO_INT13
- * G3 7 4Bit GPIO_INT14
- * H0 8 4Bit WKUP_INT
- * H1 8 4Bit WKUP_INT
- * H2 8 4Bit WKUP_INT
- * H3 8 4Bit WKUP_INT
- * I 8 4Bit GPIO_INT15
- * J0 8 4Bit GPIO_INT16
- * J1 5 4Bit GPIO_INT17
- * J2 8 4Bit GPIO_INT18
- * J3 8 4Bit GPIO_INT19
- * J4 4 4Bit GPIO_INT20
- * K0 8 4Bit None
- * K1 6 4Bit None
- * K2 8 4Bit None
- * K3 8 4Bit None
- * L0 8 4Bit None
- * L1 8 4Bit None
- * L2 8 4Bit None
- * L3 8 4Bit None
- */
-
-static struct samsung_gpio_chip s5pc100_gpios_4bit[] = {
-#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_S5PC100
- {
- .chip = {
- .base = S5PC100_GPA0(0),
- .ngpio = S5PC100_GPIO_A0_NR,
- .label = "GPA0",
- },
- }, {
- .chip = {
- .base = S5PC100_GPA1(0),
- .ngpio = S5PC100_GPIO_A1_NR,
- .label = "GPA1",
- },
- }, {
- .chip = {
- .base = S5PC100_GPB(0),
- .ngpio = S5PC100_GPIO_B_NR,
- .label = "GPB",
- },
- }, {
- .chip = {
- .base = S5PC100_GPC(0),
- .ngpio = S5PC100_GPIO_C_NR,
- .label = "GPC",
- },
- }, {
- .chip = {
- .base = S5PC100_GPD(0),
- .ngpio = S5PC100_GPIO_D_NR,
- .label = "GPD",
- },
- }, {
- .chip = {
- .base = S5PC100_GPE0(0),
- .ngpio = S5PC100_GPIO_E0_NR,
- .label = "GPE0",
- },
- }, {
- .chip = {
- .base = S5PC100_GPE1(0),
- .ngpio = S5PC100_GPIO_E1_NR,
- .label = "GPE1",
- },
- }, {
- .chip = {
- .base = S5PC100_GPF0(0),
- .ngpio = S5PC100_GPIO_F0_NR,
- .label = "GPF0",
- },
- }, {
- .chip = {
- .base = S5PC100_GPF1(0),
- .ngpio = S5PC100_GPIO_F1_NR,
- .label = "GPF1",
- },
- }, {
- .chip = {
- .base = S5PC100_GPF2(0),
- .ngpio = S5PC100_GPIO_F2_NR,
- .label = "GPF2",
- },
- }, {
- .chip = {
- .base = S5PC100_GPF3(0),
- .ngpio = S5PC100_GPIO_F3_NR,
- .label = "GPF3",
- },
- }, {
- .chip = {
- .base = S5PC100_GPG0(0),
- .ngpio = S5PC100_GPIO_G0_NR,
- .label = "GPG0",
- },
- }, {
- .chip = {
- .base = S5PC100_GPG1(0),
- .ngpio = S5PC100_GPIO_G1_NR,
- .label = "GPG1",
- },
- }, {
- .chip = {
- .base = S5PC100_GPG2(0),
- .ngpio = S5PC100_GPIO_G2_NR,
- .label = "GPG2",
- },
- }, {
- .chip = {
- .base = S5PC100_GPG3(0),
- .ngpio = S5PC100_GPIO_G3_NR,
- .label = "GPG3",
- },
- }, {
- .chip = {
- .base = S5PC100_GPI(0),
- .ngpio = S5PC100_GPIO_I_NR,
- .label = "GPI",
- },
- }, {
- .chip = {
- .base = S5PC100_GPJ0(0),
- .ngpio = S5PC100_GPIO_J0_NR,
- .label = "GPJ0",
- },
- }, {
- .chip = {
- .base = S5PC100_GPJ1(0),
- .ngpio = S5PC100_GPIO_J1_NR,
- .label = "GPJ1",
- },
- }, {
- .chip = {
- .base = S5PC100_GPJ2(0),
- .ngpio = S5PC100_GPIO_J2_NR,
- .label = "GPJ2",
- },
- }, {
- .chip = {
- .base = S5PC100_GPJ3(0),
- .ngpio = S5PC100_GPIO_J3_NR,
- .label = "GPJ3",
- },
- }, {
- .chip = {
- .base = S5PC100_GPJ4(0),
- .ngpio = S5PC100_GPIO_J4_NR,
- .label = "GPJ4",
- },
- }, {
- .chip = {
- .base = S5PC100_GPK0(0),
- .ngpio = S5PC100_GPIO_K0_NR,
- .label = "GPK0",
- },
- }, {
- .chip = {
- .base = S5PC100_GPK1(0),
- .ngpio = S5PC100_GPIO_K1_NR,
- .label = "GPK1",
- },
- }, {
- .chip = {
- .base = S5PC100_GPK2(0),
- .ngpio = S5PC100_GPIO_K2_NR,
- .label = "GPK2",
- },
- }, {
- .chip = {
- .base = S5PC100_GPK3(0),
- .ngpio = S5PC100_GPIO_K3_NR,
- .label = "GPK3",
- },
- }, {
- .chip = {
- .base = S5PC100_GPL0(0),
- .ngpio = S5PC100_GPIO_L0_NR,
- .label = "GPL0",
- },
- }, {
- .chip = {
- .base = S5PC100_GPL1(0),
- .ngpio = S5PC100_GPIO_L1_NR,
- .label = "GPL1",
- },
- }, {
- .chip = {
- .base = S5PC100_GPL2(0),
- .ngpio = S5PC100_GPIO_L2_NR,
- .label = "GPL2",
- },
- }, {
- .chip = {
- .base = S5PC100_GPL3(0),
- .ngpio = S5PC100_GPIO_L3_NR,
- .label = "GPL3",
- },
- }, {
- .chip = {
- .base = S5PC100_GPL4(0),
- .ngpio = S5PC100_GPIO_L4_NR,
- .label = "GPL4",
- },
- }, {
- .base = (S5P_VA_GPIO + 0xC00),
- .irq_base = IRQ_EINT(0),
- .chip = {
- .base = S5PC100_GPH0(0),
- .ngpio = S5PC100_GPIO_H0_NR,
- .label = "GPH0",
- .to_irq = samsung_gpiolib_to_irq,
- },
- }, {
- .base = (S5P_VA_GPIO + 0xC20),
- .irq_base = IRQ_EINT(8),
- .chip = {
- .base = S5PC100_GPH1(0),
- .ngpio = S5PC100_GPIO_H1_NR,
- .label = "GPH1",
- .to_irq = samsung_gpiolib_to_irq,
- },
- }, {
- .base = (S5P_VA_GPIO + 0xC40),
- .irq_base = IRQ_EINT(16),
- .chip = {
- .base = S5PC100_GPH2(0),
- .ngpio = S5PC100_GPIO_H2_NR,
- .label = "GPH2",
- .to_irq = samsung_gpiolib_to_irq,
- },
- }, {
- .base = (S5P_VA_GPIO + 0xC60),
- .irq_base = IRQ_EINT(24),
- .chip = {
- .base = S5PC100_GPH3(0),
- .ngpio = S5PC100_GPIO_H3_NR,
- .label = "GPH3",
- .to_irq = samsung_gpiolib_to_irq,
- },
- },
-#endif
-};
-
-/*
* Followings are the gpio banks in S5PV210/S5PC110
*
* The 'config' member when left to NULL, is initialized to the default
@@ -1681,21 +1420,6 @@ static __init int samsung_gpiolib_init(void)
S3C64XX_VA_GPIO);
samsung_gpiolib_add_4bit2_chips(s3c64xx_gpios_4bit2,
ARRAY_SIZE(s3c64xx_gpios_4bit2));
- } else if (soc_is_s5pc100()) {
- group = 0;
- chip = s5pc100_gpios_4bit;
- nr_chips = ARRAY_SIZE(s5pc100_gpios_4bit);
-
- for (i = 0; i < nr_chips; i++, chip++) {
- if (!chip->config) {
- chip->config = &samsung_gpio_cfgs[3];
- chip->group = group++;
- }
- }
- samsung_gpiolib_add_4bit_chips(s5pc100_gpios_4bit, nr_chips, S5P_VA_GPIO);
-#if defined(CONFIG_CPU_S5PC100) && defined(CONFIG_S5P_GPIO_INT)
- s5p_register_gpioint_bank(IRQ_GPIOINT, 0, S5P_GPIOINT_GROUP_MAXNR);
-#endif
} else if (soc_is_s5pv210()) {
group = 0;
chip = s5pv210_gpios_4bit;
--
1.7.10.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 83+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 09/17] gpio: samsung: remov s5pc100 related gpio codes
@ 2014-06-30 21:32 ` Kukjin Kim
0 siblings, 0 replies; 83+ messages in thread
From: Kukjin Kim @ 2014-06-30 21:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
This patch removes gpio codes for s5pc100 SoC.
Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
---
drivers/gpio/gpio-samsung.c | 276 -------------------------------------------
1 file changed, 276 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-samsung.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-samsung.c
index d12945c..7d4281e 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-samsung.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-samsung.c
@@ -1170,267 +1170,6 @@ static struct samsung_gpio_chip s3c64xx_gpios_2bit[] = {
};
/*
- * S5PC100 GPIO bank summary:
- *
- * Bank GPIOs Style INT Type
- * A0 8 4Bit GPIO_INT0
- * A1 5 4Bit GPIO_INT1
- * B 8 4Bit GPIO_INT2
- * C 5 4Bit GPIO_INT3
- * D 7 4Bit GPIO_INT4
- * E0 8 4Bit GPIO_INT5
- * E1 6 4Bit GPIO_INT6
- * F0 8 4Bit GPIO_INT7
- * F1 8 4Bit GPIO_INT8
- * F2 8 4Bit GPIO_INT9
- * F3 4 4Bit GPIO_INT10
- * G0 8 4Bit GPIO_INT11
- * G1 3 4Bit GPIO_INT12
- * G2 7 4Bit GPIO_INT13
- * G3 7 4Bit GPIO_INT14
- * H0 8 4Bit WKUP_INT
- * H1 8 4Bit WKUP_INT
- * H2 8 4Bit WKUP_INT
- * H3 8 4Bit WKUP_INT
- * I 8 4Bit GPIO_INT15
- * J0 8 4Bit GPIO_INT16
- * J1 5 4Bit GPIO_INT17
- * J2 8 4Bit GPIO_INT18
- * J3 8 4Bit GPIO_INT19
- * J4 4 4Bit GPIO_INT20
- * K0 8 4Bit None
- * K1 6 4Bit None
- * K2 8 4Bit None
- * K3 8 4Bit None
- * L0 8 4Bit None
- * L1 8 4Bit None
- * L2 8 4Bit None
- * L3 8 4Bit None
- */
-
-static struct samsung_gpio_chip s5pc100_gpios_4bit[] = {
-#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_S5PC100
- {
- .chip = {
- .base = S5PC100_GPA0(0),
- .ngpio = S5PC100_GPIO_A0_NR,
- .label = "GPA0",
- },
- }, {
- .chip = {
- .base = S5PC100_GPA1(0),
- .ngpio = S5PC100_GPIO_A1_NR,
- .label = "GPA1",
- },
- }, {
- .chip = {
- .base = S5PC100_GPB(0),
- .ngpio = S5PC100_GPIO_B_NR,
- .label = "GPB",
- },
- }, {
- .chip = {
- .base = S5PC100_GPC(0),
- .ngpio = S5PC100_GPIO_C_NR,
- .label = "GPC",
- },
- }, {
- .chip = {
- .base = S5PC100_GPD(0),
- .ngpio = S5PC100_GPIO_D_NR,
- .label = "GPD",
- },
- }, {
- .chip = {
- .base = S5PC100_GPE0(0),
- .ngpio = S5PC100_GPIO_E0_NR,
- .label = "GPE0",
- },
- }, {
- .chip = {
- .base = S5PC100_GPE1(0),
- .ngpio = S5PC100_GPIO_E1_NR,
- .label = "GPE1",
- },
- }, {
- .chip = {
- .base = S5PC100_GPF0(0),
- .ngpio = S5PC100_GPIO_F0_NR,
- .label = "GPF0",
- },
- }, {
- .chip = {
- .base = S5PC100_GPF1(0),
- .ngpio = S5PC100_GPIO_F1_NR,
- .label = "GPF1",
- },
- }, {
- .chip = {
- .base = S5PC100_GPF2(0),
- .ngpio = S5PC100_GPIO_F2_NR,
- .label = "GPF2",
- },
- }, {
- .chip = {
- .base = S5PC100_GPF3(0),
- .ngpio = S5PC100_GPIO_F3_NR,
- .label = "GPF3",
- },
- }, {
- .chip = {
- .base = S5PC100_GPG0(0),
- .ngpio = S5PC100_GPIO_G0_NR,
- .label = "GPG0",
- },
- }, {
- .chip = {
- .base = S5PC100_GPG1(0),
- .ngpio = S5PC100_GPIO_G1_NR,
- .label = "GPG1",
- },
- }, {
- .chip = {
- .base = S5PC100_GPG2(0),
- .ngpio = S5PC100_GPIO_G2_NR,
- .label = "GPG2",
- },
- }, {
- .chip = {
- .base = S5PC100_GPG3(0),
- .ngpio = S5PC100_GPIO_G3_NR,
- .label = "GPG3",
- },
- }, {
- .chip = {
- .base = S5PC100_GPI(0),
- .ngpio = S5PC100_GPIO_I_NR,
- .label = "GPI",
- },
- }, {
- .chip = {
- .base = S5PC100_GPJ0(0),
- .ngpio = S5PC100_GPIO_J0_NR,
- .label = "GPJ0",
- },
- }, {
- .chip = {
- .base = S5PC100_GPJ1(0),
- .ngpio = S5PC100_GPIO_J1_NR,
- .label = "GPJ1",
- },
- }, {
- .chip = {
- .base = S5PC100_GPJ2(0),
- .ngpio = S5PC100_GPIO_J2_NR,
- .label = "GPJ2",
- },
- }, {
- .chip = {
- .base = S5PC100_GPJ3(0),
- .ngpio = S5PC100_GPIO_J3_NR,
- .label = "GPJ3",
- },
- }, {
- .chip = {
- .base = S5PC100_GPJ4(0),
- .ngpio = S5PC100_GPIO_J4_NR,
- .label = "GPJ4",
- },
- }, {
- .chip = {
- .base = S5PC100_GPK0(0),
- .ngpio = S5PC100_GPIO_K0_NR,
- .label = "GPK0",
- },
- }, {
- .chip = {
- .base = S5PC100_GPK1(0),
- .ngpio = S5PC100_GPIO_K1_NR,
- .label = "GPK1",
- },
- }, {
- .chip = {
- .base = S5PC100_GPK2(0),
- .ngpio = S5PC100_GPIO_K2_NR,
- .label = "GPK2",
- },
- }, {
- .chip = {
- .base = S5PC100_GPK3(0),
- .ngpio = S5PC100_GPIO_K3_NR,
- .label = "GPK3",
- },
- }, {
- .chip = {
- .base = S5PC100_GPL0(0),
- .ngpio = S5PC100_GPIO_L0_NR,
- .label = "GPL0",
- },
- }, {
- .chip = {
- .base = S5PC100_GPL1(0),
- .ngpio = S5PC100_GPIO_L1_NR,
- .label = "GPL1",
- },
- }, {
- .chip = {
- .base = S5PC100_GPL2(0),
- .ngpio = S5PC100_GPIO_L2_NR,
- .label = "GPL2",
- },
- }, {
- .chip = {
- .base = S5PC100_GPL3(0),
- .ngpio = S5PC100_GPIO_L3_NR,
- .label = "GPL3",
- },
- }, {
- .chip = {
- .base = S5PC100_GPL4(0),
- .ngpio = S5PC100_GPIO_L4_NR,
- .label = "GPL4",
- },
- }, {
- .base = (S5P_VA_GPIO + 0xC00),
- .irq_base = IRQ_EINT(0),
- .chip = {
- .base = S5PC100_GPH0(0),
- .ngpio = S5PC100_GPIO_H0_NR,
- .label = "GPH0",
- .to_irq = samsung_gpiolib_to_irq,
- },
- }, {
- .base = (S5P_VA_GPIO + 0xC20),
- .irq_base = IRQ_EINT(8),
- .chip = {
- .base = S5PC100_GPH1(0),
- .ngpio = S5PC100_GPIO_H1_NR,
- .label = "GPH1",
- .to_irq = samsung_gpiolib_to_irq,
- },
- }, {
- .base = (S5P_VA_GPIO + 0xC40),
- .irq_base = IRQ_EINT(16),
- .chip = {
- .base = S5PC100_GPH2(0),
- .ngpio = S5PC100_GPIO_H2_NR,
- .label = "GPH2",
- .to_irq = samsung_gpiolib_to_irq,
- },
- }, {
- .base = (S5P_VA_GPIO + 0xC60),
- .irq_base = IRQ_EINT(24),
- .chip = {
- .base = S5PC100_GPH3(0),
- .ngpio = S5PC100_GPIO_H3_NR,
- .label = "GPH3",
- .to_irq = samsung_gpiolib_to_irq,
- },
- },
-#endif
-};
-
-/*
* Followings are the gpio banks in S5PV210/S5PC110
*
* The 'config' member when left to NULL, is initialized to the default
@@ -1681,21 +1420,6 @@ static __init int samsung_gpiolib_init(void)
S3C64XX_VA_GPIO);
samsung_gpiolib_add_4bit2_chips(s3c64xx_gpios_4bit2,
ARRAY_SIZE(s3c64xx_gpios_4bit2));
- } else if (soc_is_s5pc100()) {
- group = 0;
- chip = s5pc100_gpios_4bit;
- nr_chips = ARRAY_SIZE(s5pc100_gpios_4bit);
-
- for (i = 0; i < nr_chips; i++, chip++) {
- if (!chip->config) {
- chip->config = &samsung_gpio_cfgs[3];
- chip->group = group++;
- }
- }
- samsung_gpiolib_add_4bit_chips(s5pc100_gpios_4bit, nr_chips, S5P_VA_GPIO);
-#if defined(CONFIG_CPU_S5PC100) && defined(CONFIG_S5P_GPIO_INT)
- s5p_register_gpioint_bank(IRQ_GPIOINT, 0, S5P_GPIOINT_GROUP_MAXNR);
-#endif
} else if (soc_is_s5pv210()) {
group = 0;
chip = s5pv210_gpios_4bit;
--
1.7.10.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 83+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 10/17] spi: s3c64xx: remove s5pc100 related spi codes
2014-06-30 21:32 ` Kukjin Kim
@ 2014-06-30 21:32 ` Kukjin Kim
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 83+ messages in thread
From: Kukjin Kim @ 2014-06-30 21:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel, linux-samsung-soc; +Cc: Kukjin Kim, Mark Brown
This patch removes sp5c100 related spi because of no more support
s5pc100 SoC.
Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@linaro.org>
---
drivers/spi/spi-s3c64xx.c | 13 -------------
1 file changed, 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-s3c64xx.c b/drivers/spi/spi-s3c64xx.c
index 4a1890a..a771a3a 100644
--- a/drivers/spi/spi-s3c64xx.c
+++ b/drivers/spi/spi-s3c64xx.c
@@ -1323,13 +1323,6 @@ static struct s3c64xx_spi_port_config s3c6410_spi_port_config = {
.tx_st_done = 21,
};
-static struct s3c64xx_spi_port_config s5pc100_spi_port_config = {
- .fifo_lvl_mask = { 0x7f, 0x7F },
- .rx_lvl_offset = 13,
- .tx_st_done = 21,
- .high_speed = true,
-};
-
static struct s3c64xx_spi_port_config s5pv210_spi_port_config = {
.fifo_lvl_mask = { 0x1ff, 0x7F },
.rx_lvl_offset = 15,
@@ -1362,9 +1355,6 @@ static struct platform_device_id s3c64xx_spi_driver_ids[] = {
.name = "s3c6410-spi",
.driver_data = (kernel_ulong_t)&s3c6410_spi_port_config,
}, {
- .name = "s5pc100-spi",
- .driver_data = (kernel_ulong_t)&s5pc100_spi_port_config,
- }, {
.name = "s5pv210-spi",
.driver_data = (kernel_ulong_t)&s5pv210_spi_port_config,
}, {
@@ -1381,9 +1371,6 @@ static const struct of_device_id s3c64xx_spi_dt_match[] = {
{ .compatible = "samsung,s3c6410-spi",
.data = (void *)&s3c6410_spi_port_config,
},
- { .compatible = "samsung,s5pc100-spi",
- .data = (void *)&s5pc100_spi_port_config,
- },
{ .compatible = "samsung,s5pv210-spi",
.data = (void *)&s5pv210_spi_port_config,
},
--
1.7.10.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 83+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 10/17] spi: s3c64xx: remove s5pc100 related spi codes
@ 2014-06-30 21:32 ` Kukjin Kim
0 siblings, 0 replies; 83+ messages in thread
From: Kukjin Kim @ 2014-06-30 21:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
This patch removes sp5c100 related spi because of no more support
s5pc100 SoC.
Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@linaro.org>
---
drivers/spi/spi-s3c64xx.c | 13 -------------
1 file changed, 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-s3c64xx.c b/drivers/spi/spi-s3c64xx.c
index 4a1890a..a771a3a 100644
--- a/drivers/spi/spi-s3c64xx.c
+++ b/drivers/spi/spi-s3c64xx.c
@@ -1323,13 +1323,6 @@ static struct s3c64xx_spi_port_config s3c6410_spi_port_config = {
.tx_st_done = 21,
};
-static struct s3c64xx_spi_port_config s5pc100_spi_port_config = {
- .fifo_lvl_mask = { 0x7f, 0x7F },
- .rx_lvl_offset = 13,
- .tx_st_done = 21,
- .high_speed = true,
-};
-
static struct s3c64xx_spi_port_config s5pv210_spi_port_config = {
.fifo_lvl_mask = { 0x1ff, 0x7F },
.rx_lvl_offset = 15,
@@ -1362,9 +1355,6 @@ static struct platform_device_id s3c64xx_spi_driver_ids[] = {
.name = "s3c6410-spi",
.driver_data = (kernel_ulong_t)&s3c6410_spi_port_config,
}, {
- .name = "s5pc100-spi",
- .driver_data = (kernel_ulong_t)&s5pc100_spi_port_config,
- }, {
.name = "s5pv210-spi",
.driver_data = (kernel_ulong_t)&s5pv210_spi_port_config,
}, {
@@ -1381,9 +1371,6 @@ static const struct of_device_id s3c64xx_spi_dt_match[] = {
{ .compatible = "samsung,s3c6410-spi",
.data = (void *)&s3c6410_spi_port_config,
},
- { .compatible = "samsung,s5pc100-spi",
- .data = (void *)&s5pc100_spi_port_config,
- },
{ .compatible = "samsung,s5pv210-spi",
.data = (void *)&s5pv210_spi_port_config,
},
--
1.7.10.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 83+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 11/17] pwm: samsung: remove s5pc100 related pwm codes
2014-06-30 21:32 ` Kukjin Kim
@ 2014-06-30 21:32 ` Kukjin Kim
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 83+ messages in thread
From: Kukjin Kim @ 2014-06-30 21:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel, linux-samsung-soc; +Cc: Kukjin Kim, Thierry Reding
This patch removes supporting s5pc100 related pwm codes.
Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
---
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-samsung.txt | 2 --
drivers/clocksource/samsung_pwm_timer.c | 12 ------------
drivers/pwm/pwm-samsung.c | 8 --------
3 files changed, 22 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-samsung.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-samsung.txt
index 43925d3..82c7f6b 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-samsung.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-samsung.txt
@@ -11,8 +11,6 @@ Required properties:
- compatible : should be one of following:
samsung,s3c2410-pwm - for 16-bit timers present on S3C24xx SoCs
samsung,s3c6400-pwm - for 32-bit timers present on S3C64xx SoCs
- samsung,s5pc100-pwm - for 32-bit timers present on S5PC100, S5PV210,
- Exynos4210 rev0 SoCs
samsung,exynos4210-pwm - for 32-bit timers present on Exynos4210,
Exynos4x12, Exynos5250 and Exynos5420 SoCs
- reg: base address and size of register area
diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/samsung_pwm_timer.c b/drivers/clocksource/samsung_pwm_timer.c
index e35a9b7..d846caa 100644
--- a/drivers/clocksource/samsung_pwm_timer.c
+++ b/drivers/clocksource/samsung_pwm_timer.c
@@ -480,16 +480,4 @@ static void __init s3c64xx_pwm_clocksource_init(struct device_node *np)
}
CLOCKSOURCE_OF_DECLARE(s3c6400_pwm, "samsung,s3c6400-pwm", s3c64xx_pwm_clocksource_init);
-static const struct samsung_pwm_variant s5p_variant = {
- .bits = 32,
- .div_base = 0,
- .has_tint_cstat = true,
- .tclk_mask = (1 << 5),
-};
-
-static void __init s5p_pwm_clocksource_init(struct device_node *np)
-{
- samsung_pwm_alloc(np, &s5p_variant);
-}
-CLOCKSOURCE_OF_DECLARE(s5pc100_pwm, "samsung,s5pc100-pwm", s5p_pwm_clocksource_init);
#endif
diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-samsung.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-samsung.c
index 68f3471..d40364a 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-samsung.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-samsung.c
@@ -411,17 +411,9 @@ static const struct samsung_pwm_variant exynos4210_variant = {
.tclk_mask = 0,
};
-static const struct samsung_pwm_variant s5pc100_variant = {
- .bits = 32,
- .div_base = 0,
- .has_tint_cstat = true,
- .tclk_mask = BIT(5),
-};
-
static const struct of_device_id samsung_pwm_matches[] = {
{ .compatible = "samsung,s3c2410-pwm", .data = &s3c24xx_variant },
{ .compatible = "samsung,s3c6400-pwm", .data = &s3c64xx_variant },
- { .compatible = "samsung,s5pc100-pwm", .data = &s5pc100_variant },
{ .compatible = "samsung,exynos4210-pwm", .data = &exynos4210_variant },
{},
};
--
1.7.10.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 83+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 11/17] pwm: samsung: remove s5pc100 related pwm codes
@ 2014-06-30 21:32 ` Kukjin Kim
0 siblings, 0 replies; 83+ messages in thread
From: Kukjin Kim @ 2014-06-30 21:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
This patch removes supporting s5pc100 related pwm codes.
Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
---
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-samsung.txt | 2 --
drivers/clocksource/samsung_pwm_timer.c | 12 ------------
drivers/pwm/pwm-samsung.c | 8 --------
3 files changed, 22 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-samsung.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-samsung.txt
index 43925d3..82c7f6b 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-samsung.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-samsung.txt
@@ -11,8 +11,6 @@ Required properties:
- compatible : should be one of following:
samsung,s3c2410-pwm - for 16-bit timers present on S3C24xx SoCs
samsung,s3c6400-pwm - for 32-bit timers present on S3C64xx SoCs
- samsung,s5pc100-pwm - for 32-bit timers present on S5PC100, S5PV210,
- Exynos4210 rev0 SoCs
samsung,exynos4210-pwm - for 32-bit timers present on Exynos4210,
Exynos4x12, Exynos5250 and Exynos5420 SoCs
- reg: base address and size of register area
diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/samsung_pwm_timer.c b/drivers/clocksource/samsung_pwm_timer.c
index e35a9b7..d846caa 100644
--- a/drivers/clocksource/samsung_pwm_timer.c
+++ b/drivers/clocksource/samsung_pwm_timer.c
@@ -480,16 +480,4 @@ static void __init s3c64xx_pwm_clocksource_init(struct device_node *np)
}
CLOCKSOURCE_OF_DECLARE(s3c6400_pwm, "samsung,s3c6400-pwm", s3c64xx_pwm_clocksource_init);
-static const struct samsung_pwm_variant s5p_variant = {
- .bits = 32,
- .div_base = 0,
- .has_tint_cstat = true,
- .tclk_mask = (1 << 5),
-};
-
-static void __init s5p_pwm_clocksource_init(struct device_node *np)
-{
- samsung_pwm_alloc(np, &s5p_variant);
-}
-CLOCKSOURCE_OF_DECLARE(s5pc100_pwm, "samsung,s5pc100-pwm", s5p_pwm_clocksource_init);
#endif
diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-samsung.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-samsung.c
index 68f3471..d40364a 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-samsung.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-samsung.c
@@ -411,17 +411,9 @@ static const struct samsung_pwm_variant exynos4210_variant = {
.tclk_mask = 0,
};
-static const struct samsung_pwm_variant s5pc100_variant = {
- .bits = 32,
- .div_base = 0,
- .has_tint_cstat = true,
- .tclk_mask = BIT(5),
-};
-
static const struct of_device_id samsung_pwm_matches[] = {
{ .compatible = "samsung,s3c2410-pwm", .data = &s3c24xx_variant },
{ .compatible = "samsung,s3c6400-pwm", .data = &s3c64xx_variant },
- { .compatible = "samsung,s5pc100-pwm", .data = &s5pc100_variant },
{ .compatible = "samsung,exynos4210-pwm", .data = &exynos4210_variant },
{},
};
--
1.7.10.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 83+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 12/17] serial: samsung: no more support for S5PC100 SoC
2014-06-30 21:32 ` Kukjin Kim
@ 2014-06-30 21:32 ` Kukjin Kim
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 83+ messages in thread
From: Kukjin Kim @ 2014-06-30 21:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel, linux-samsung-soc; +Cc: Kukjin Kim, Greg Kroah-Hartman
This patch removes s5pc100 related serial.
Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/tty/serial/samsung.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/samsung.c b/drivers/tty/serial/samsung.c
index 39b1219..36c7747 100644
--- a/drivers/tty/serial/samsung.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/serial/samsung.c
@@ -1712,8 +1712,7 @@ static struct s3c24xx_serial_drv_data s3c2440_serial_drv_data = {
#define S3C2440_SERIAL_DRV_DATA (kernel_ulong_t)NULL
#endif
-#if defined(CONFIG_CPU_S3C6400) || defined(CONFIG_CPU_S3C6410) || \
- defined(CONFIG_CPU_S5PC100)
+#if defined(CONFIG_CPU_S3C6400) || defined(CONFIG_CPU_S3C6410)
static struct s3c24xx_serial_drv_data s3c6400_serial_drv_data = {
.info = &(struct s3c24xx_uart_info) {
.name = "Samsung S3C6400 UART",
--
1.7.10.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 83+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 12/17] serial: samsung: no more support for S5PC100 SoC
@ 2014-06-30 21:32 ` Kukjin Kim
0 siblings, 0 replies; 83+ messages in thread
From: Kukjin Kim @ 2014-06-30 21:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
This patch removes s5pc100 related serial.
Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/tty/serial/samsung.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/samsung.c b/drivers/tty/serial/samsung.c
index 39b1219..36c7747 100644
--- a/drivers/tty/serial/samsung.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/serial/samsung.c
@@ -1712,8 +1712,7 @@ static struct s3c24xx_serial_drv_data s3c2440_serial_drv_data = {
#define S3C2440_SERIAL_DRV_DATA (kernel_ulong_t)NULL
#endif
-#if defined(CONFIG_CPU_S3C6400) || defined(CONFIG_CPU_S3C6410) || \
- defined(CONFIG_CPU_S5PC100)
+#if defined(CONFIG_CPU_S3C6400) || defined(CONFIG_CPU_S3C6410)
static struct s3c24xx_serial_drv_data s3c6400_serial_drv_data = {
.info = &(struct s3c24xx_uart_info) {
.name = "Samsung S3C6400 UART",
--
1.7.10.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 83+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 13/17] ata: pata_samsung_cf: removes s5pc100 related ata codes
2014-06-30 21:32 ` Kukjin Kim
@ 2014-06-30 21:32 ` Kukjin Kim
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 83+ messages in thread
From: Kukjin Kim @ 2014-06-30 21:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel, linux-samsung-soc; +Cc: Kukjin Kim, Tejun Heo
This patch removes support for s5pc100 ata because of no more support
S5PC100 SoC in mainline.
Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
gpio: samsung: remove s5p64x0 related gpio codes
This patch removes gpio codes for s5p6440 and s5p6450 SoCs.
---
drivers/ata/pata_samsung_cf.c | 13 -------------
include/linux/platform_data/ata-samsung_cf.h | 1 -
2 files changed, 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/ata/pata_samsung_cf.c b/drivers/ata/pata_samsung_cf.c
index fb52883..2578fc1 100644
--- a/drivers/ata/pata_samsung_cf.c
+++ b/drivers/ata/pata_samsung_cf.c
@@ -54,7 +54,6 @@
enum s3c_cpu_type {
TYPE_S3C64XX,
- TYPE_S5PC100,
TYPE_S5PV210,
};
@@ -476,10 +475,6 @@ static void pata_s3c_hwinit(struct s3c_ide_info *info,
writel(0x1b, info->ide_addr + S3C_ATA_IRQ_MSK);
break;
- case TYPE_S5PC100:
- pata_s3c_cfg_mode(info->sfr_addr);
- /* FALLTHROUGH */
-
case TYPE_S5PV210:
/* Configure as little endian */
pata_s3c_set_endian(info->ide_addr, 0);
@@ -549,11 +544,6 @@ static int __init pata_s3c_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
info->sfr_addr = info->ide_addr + 0x1800;
info->ide_addr += 0x1900;
info->fifo_status_reg = 0x94;
- } else if (cpu_type == TYPE_S5PC100) {
- ap->ops = &pata_s5p_port_ops;
- info->sfr_addr = info->ide_addr + 0x1800;
- info->ide_addr += 0x1900;
- info->fifo_status_reg = 0x84;
} else {
ap->ops = &pata_s5p_port_ops;
info->fifo_status_reg = 0x84;
@@ -653,9 +643,6 @@ static struct platform_device_id pata_s3c_driver_ids[] = {
.name = "s3c64xx-pata",
.driver_data = TYPE_S3C64XX,
}, {
- .name = "s5pc100-pata",
- .driver_data = TYPE_S5PC100,
- }, {
.name = "s5pv210-pata",
.driver_data = TYPE_S5PV210,
},
diff --git a/include/linux/platform_data/ata-samsung_cf.h b/include/linux/platform_data/ata-samsung_cf.h
index c2049e3..748e716 100644
--- a/include/linux/platform_data/ata-samsung_cf.h
+++ b/include/linux/platform_data/ata-samsung_cf.h
@@ -29,7 +29,6 @@ extern void s3c_ide_set_platdata(struct s3c_ide_platdata *pdata);
/* architecture-specific IDE configuration */
extern void s3c64xx_ide_setup_gpio(void);
-extern void s5pc100_ide_setup_gpio(void);
extern void s5pv210_ide_setup_gpio(void);
#endif /*__ATA_SAMSUNG_CF_H */
--
1.7.10.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 83+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 13/17] ata: pata_samsung_cf: removes s5pc100 related ata codes
@ 2014-06-30 21:32 ` Kukjin Kim
0 siblings, 0 replies; 83+ messages in thread
From: Kukjin Kim @ 2014-06-30 21:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
This patch removes support for s5pc100 ata because of no more support
S5PC100 SoC in mainline.
Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
gpio: samsung: remove s5p64x0 related gpio codes
This patch removes gpio codes for s5p6440 and s5p6450 SoCs.
---
drivers/ata/pata_samsung_cf.c | 13 -------------
include/linux/platform_data/ata-samsung_cf.h | 1 -
2 files changed, 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/ata/pata_samsung_cf.c b/drivers/ata/pata_samsung_cf.c
index fb52883..2578fc1 100644
--- a/drivers/ata/pata_samsung_cf.c
+++ b/drivers/ata/pata_samsung_cf.c
@@ -54,7 +54,6 @@
enum s3c_cpu_type {
TYPE_S3C64XX,
- TYPE_S5PC100,
TYPE_S5PV210,
};
@@ -476,10 +475,6 @@ static void pata_s3c_hwinit(struct s3c_ide_info *info,
writel(0x1b, info->ide_addr + S3C_ATA_IRQ_MSK);
break;
- case TYPE_S5PC100:
- pata_s3c_cfg_mode(info->sfr_addr);
- /* FALLTHROUGH */
-
case TYPE_S5PV210:
/* Configure as little endian */
pata_s3c_set_endian(info->ide_addr, 0);
@@ -549,11 +544,6 @@ static int __init pata_s3c_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
info->sfr_addr = info->ide_addr + 0x1800;
info->ide_addr += 0x1900;
info->fifo_status_reg = 0x94;
- } else if (cpu_type == TYPE_S5PC100) {
- ap->ops = &pata_s5p_port_ops;
- info->sfr_addr = info->ide_addr + 0x1800;
- info->ide_addr += 0x1900;
- info->fifo_status_reg = 0x84;
} else {
ap->ops = &pata_s5p_port_ops;
info->fifo_status_reg = 0x84;
@@ -653,9 +643,6 @@ static struct platform_device_id pata_s3c_driver_ids[] = {
.name = "s3c64xx-pata",
.driver_data = TYPE_S3C64XX,
}, {
- .name = "s5pc100-pata",
- .driver_data = TYPE_S5PC100,
- }, {
.name = "s5pv210-pata",
.driver_data = TYPE_S5PV210,
},
diff --git a/include/linux/platform_data/ata-samsung_cf.h b/include/linux/platform_data/ata-samsung_cf.h
index c2049e3..748e716 100644
--- a/include/linux/platform_data/ata-samsung_cf.h
+++ b/include/linux/platform_data/ata-samsung_cf.h
@@ -29,7 +29,6 @@ extern void s3c_ide_set_platdata(struct s3c_ide_platdata *pdata);
/* architecture-specific IDE configuration */
extern void s3c64xx_ide_setup_gpio(void);
-extern void s5pc100_ide_setup_gpio(void);
extern void s5pv210_ide_setup_gpio(void);
#endif /*__ATA_SAMSUNG_CF_H */
--
1.7.10.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 83+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 14/17] mtd: onenand: remove s5pc100 related onenand codes
2014-06-30 21:32 ` Kukjin Kim
@ 2014-06-30 21:32 ` Kukjin Kim
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 83+ messages in thread
From: Kukjin Kim @ 2014-06-30 21:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel, linux-samsung-soc
Cc: Kukjin Kim, Kyungmin Park, David Woodhouse, Brian Norris
This patch removes s5pc100 related onenand codes because of no more
support for S5PC100 SoC in mainline.
Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
Cc: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Cc: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>
---
drivers/mtd/onenand/Kconfig | 4 ++--
drivers/mtd/onenand/samsung.c | 25 +------------------------
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/onenand/Kconfig b/drivers/mtd/onenand/Kconfig
index ab26072..dcae2f6 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/onenand/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/mtd/onenand/Kconfig
@@ -32,10 +32,10 @@ config MTD_ONENAND_OMAP2
config MTD_ONENAND_SAMSUNG
tristate "OneNAND on Samsung SOC controller support"
- depends on ARCH_S3C64XX || ARCH_S5PC100 || ARCH_S5PV210 || ARCH_EXYNOS4
+ depends on ARCH_S3C64XX || ARCH_S5PV210 || ARCH_EXYNOS4
help
Support for a OneNAND flash device connected to an Samsung SOC.
- S3C64XX/S5PC100 use command mapping method.
+ S3C64XX uses command mapping method.
S5PC110/S5PC210 use generic OneNAND method.
config MTD_ONENAND_OTP
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/onenand/samsung.c b/drivers/mtd/onenand/samsung.c
index efb819c..19cfb97 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/onenand/samsung.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/onenand/samsung.c
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
* published by the Free Software Foundation.
*
* Implementation:
- * S3C64XX and S5PC100: emulate the pseudo BufferRAM
+ * S3C64XX: emulate the pseudo BufferRAM
* S5PC110: use DMA
*/
@@ -32,7 +32,6 @@
enum soc_type {
TYPE_S3C6400,
TYPE_S3C6410,
- TYPE_S5PC100,
TYPE_S5PC110,
};
@@ -59,7 +58,6 @@ enum soc_type {
#define MAP_11 (0x3)
#define S3C64XX_CMD_MAP_SHIFT 24
-#define S5PC100_CMD_MAP_SHIFT 26
#define S3C6400_FBA_SHIFT 10
#define S3C6400_FPA_SHIFT 4
@@ -69,10 +67,6 @@ enum soc_type {
#define S3C6410_FPA_SHIFT 6
#define S3C6410_FSA_SHIFT 4
-#define S5PC100_FBA_SHIFT 13
-#define S5PC100_FPA_SHIFT 7
-#define S5PC100_FSA_SHIFT 5
-
/* S5PC110 specific definitions */
#define S5PC110_DMA_SRC_ADDR 0x400
#define S5PC110_DMA_SRC_CFG 0x404
@@ -195,11 +189,6 @@ static unsigned int s3c64xx_cmd_map(unsigned type, unsigned val)
return (type << S3C64XX_CMD_MAP_SHIFT) | val;
}
-static unsigned int s5pc1xx_cmd_map(unsigned type, unsigned val)
-{
- return (type << S5PC100_CMD_MAP_SHIFT) | val;
-}
-
static unsigned int s3c6400_mem_addr(int fba, int fpa, int fsa)
{
return (fba << S3C6400_FBA_SHIFT) | (fpa << S3C6400_FPA_SHIFT) |
@@ -212,12 +201,6 @@ static unsigned int s3c6410_mem_addr(int fba, int fpa, int fsa)
(fsa << S3C6410_FSA_SHIFT);
}
-static unsigned int s5pc100_mem_addr(int fba, int fpa, int fsa)
-{
- return (fba << S5PC100_FBA_SHIFT) | (fpa << S5PC100_FPA_SHIFT) |
- (fsa << S5PC100_FSA_SHIFT);
-}
-
static void s3c_onenand_reset(void)
{
unsigned long timeout = 0x10000;
@@ -835,9 +818,6 @@ static void s3c_onenand_setup(struct mtd_info *mtd)
} else if (onenand->type == TYPE_S3C6410) {
onenand->mem_addr = s3c6410_mem_addr;
onenand->cmd_map = s3c64xx_cmd_map;
- } else if (onenand->type == TYPE_S5PC100) {
- onenand->mem_addr = s5pc100_mem_addr;
- onenand->cmd_map = s5pc1xx_cmd_map;
} else if (onenand->type == TYPE_S5PC110) {
/* Use generic onenand functions */
this->read_bufferram = s5pc110_read_bufferram;
@@ -1111,9 +1091,6 @@ static struct platform_device_id s3c_onenand_driver_ids[] = {
.name = "s3c6410-onenand",
.driver_data = TYPE_S3C6410,
}, {
- .name = "s5pc100-onenand",
- .driver_data = TYPE_S5PC100,
- }, {
.name = "s5pc110-onenand",
.driver_data = TYPE_S5PC110,
}, { },
--
1.7.10.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 83+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 14/17] mtd: onenand: remove s5pc100 related onenand codes
@ 2014-06-30 21:32 ` Kukjin Kim
0 siblings, 0 replies; 83+ messages in thread
From: Kukjin Kim @ 2014-06-30 21:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
This patch removes s5pc100 related onenand codes because of no more
support for S5PC100 SoC in mainline.
Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
Cc: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Cc: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>
---
drivers/mtd/onenand/Kconfig | 4 ++--
drivers/mtd/onenand/samsung.c | 25 +------------------------
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/onenand/Kconfig b/drivers/mtd/onenand/Kconfig
index ab26072..dcae2f6 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/onenand/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/mtd/onenand/Kconfig
@@ -32,10 +32,10 @@ config MTD_ONENAND_OMAP2
config MTD_ONENAND_SAMSUNG
tristate "OneNAND on Samsung SOC controller support"
- depends on ARCH_S3C64XX || ARCH_S5PC100 || ARCH_S5PV210 || ARCH_EXYNOS4
+ depends on ARCH_S3C64XX || ARCH_S5PV210 || ARCH_EXYNOS4
help
Support for a OneNAND flash device connected to an Samsung SOC.
- S3C64XX/S5PC100 use command mapping method.
+ S3C64XX uses command mapping method.
S5PC110/S5PC210 use generic OneNAND method.
config MTD_ONENAND_OTP
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/onenand/samsung.c b/drivers/mtd/onenand/samsung.c
index efb819c..19cfb97 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/onenand/samsung.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/onenand/samsung.c
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
* published by the Free Software Foundation.
*
* Implementation:
- * S3C64XX and S5PC100: emulate the pseudo BufferRAM
+ * S3C64XX: emulate the pseudo BufferRAM
* S5PC110: use DMA
*/
@@ -32,7 +32,6 @@
enum soc_type {
TYPE_S3C6400,
TYPE_S3C6410,
- TYPE_S5PC100,
TYPE_S5PC110,
};
@@ -59,7 +58,6 @@ enum soc_type {
#define MAP_11 (0x3)
#define S3C64XX_CMD_MAP_SHIFT 24
-#define S5PC100_CMD_MAP_SHIFT 26
#define S3C6400_FBA_SHIFT 10
#define S3C6400_FPA_SHIFT 4
@@ -69,10 +67,6 @@ enum soc_type {
#define S3C6410_FPA_SHIFT 6
#define S3C6410_FSA_SHIFT 4
-#define S5PC100_FBA_SHIFT 13
-#define S5PC100_FPA_SHIFT 7
-#define S5PC100_FSA_SHIFT 5
-
/* S5PC110 specific definitions */
#define S5PC110_DMA_SRC_ADDR 0x400
#define S5PC110_DMA_SRC_CFG 0x404
@@ -195,11 +189,6 @@ static unsigned int s3c64xx_cmd_map(unsigned type, unsigned val)
return (type << S3C64XX_CMD_MAP_SHIFT) | val;
}
-static unsigned int s5pc1xx_cmd_map(unsigned type, unsigned val)
-{
- return (type << S5PC100_CMD_MAP_SHIFT) | val;
-}
-
static unsigned int s3c6400_mem_addr(int fba, int fpa, int fsa)
{
return (fba << S3C6400_FBA_SHIFT) | (fpa << S3C6400_FPA_SHIFT) |
@@ -212,12 +201,6 @@ static unsigned int s3c6410_mem_addr(int fba, int fpa, int fsa)
(fsa << S3C6410_FSA_SHIFT);
}
-static unsigned int s5pc100_mem_addr(int fba, int fpa, int fsa)
-{
- return (fba << S5PC100_FBA_SHIFT) | (fpa << S5PC100_FPA_SHIFT) |
- (fsa << S5PC100_FSA_SHIFT);
-}
-
static void s3c_onenand_reset(void)
{
unsigned long timeout = 0x10000;
@@ -835,9 +818,6 @@ static void s3c_onenand_setup(struct mtd_info *mtd)
} else if (onenand->type == TYPE_S3C6410) {
onenand->mem_addr = s3c6410_mem_addr;
onenand->cmd_map = s3c64xx_cmd_map;
- } else if (onenand->type == TYPE_S5PC100) {
- onenand->mem_addr = s5pc100_mem_addr;
- onenand->cmd_map = s5pc1xx_cmd_map;
} else if (onenand->type == TYPE_S5PC110) {
/* Use generic onenand functions */
this->read_bufferram = s5pc110_read_bufferram;
@@ -1111,9 +1091,6 @@ static struct platform_device_id s3c_onenand_driver_ids[] = {
.name = "s3c6410-onenand",
.driver_data = TYPE_S3C6410,
}, {
- .name = "s5pc100-onenand",
- .driver_data = TYPE_S5PC100,
- }, {
.name = "s5pc110-onenand",
.driver_data = TYPE_S5PC110,
}, { },
--
1.7.10.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 83+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 15/17] video: fbdev: s3c-fb: remove s5pc100 related fimd and fb codes
2014-06-30 21:32 ` Kukjin Kim
@ 2014-06-30 21:32 ` Kukjin Kim
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 83+ messages in thread
From: Kukjin Kim @ 2014-06-30 21:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel, linux-samsung-soc; +Cc: Kukjin Kim, Tomi Valkeinen
This patch removes fimd and fb codes for s5pc100 SoC.
Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
Cc: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>
---
.../devicetree/bindings/video/samsung-fimd.txt | 1 -
drivers/video/fbdev/Kconfig | 2 +-
drivers/video/fbdev/s3c-fb.c | 35 --------------------
include/video/samsung_fimd.h | 2 +-
4 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/video/samsung-fimd.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/video/samsung-fimd.txt
index 741f4a6..7794260 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/video/samsung-fimd.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/video/samsung-fimd.txt
@@ -8,7 +8,6 @@ Required properties:
- compatible: value should be one of the following
"samsung,s3c2443-fimd"; /* for S3C24XX SoCs */
"samsung,s3c6400-fimd"; /* for S3C64XX SoCs */
- "samsung,s5pc100-fimd"; /* for S5PC100 SoC */
"samsung,s5pv210-fimd"; /* for S5PV210 SoC */
"samsung,exynos4210-fimd"; /* for Exynos4 SoCs */
"samsung,exynos5250-fimd"; /* for Exynos5 SoCs */
diff --git a/drivers/video/fbdev/Kconfig b/drivers/video/fbdev/Kconfig
index 11506e5..79708b2 100644
--- a/drivers/video/fbdev/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/video/fbdev/Kconfig
@@ -2019,7 +2019,7 @@ config FB_TMIO_ACCELL
config FB_S3C
tristate "Samsung S3C framebuffer support"
depends on FB && (CPU_S3C2416 || ARCH_S3C64XX || \
- ARCH_S5PC100 || ARCH_S5PV210 || ARCH_EXYNOS)
+ ARCH_S5PV210 || ARCH_EXYNOS)
select FB_CFB_FILLRECT
select FB_CFB_COPYAREA
select FB_CFB_IMAGEBLIT
diff --git a/drivers/video/fbdev/s3c-fb.c b/drivers/video/fbdev/s3c-fb.c
index a0cde41..b33abb0 100644
--- a/drivers/video/fbdev/s3c-fb.c
+++ b/drivers/video/fbdev/s3c-fb.c
@@ -1805,38 +1805,6 @@ static struct s3c_fb_driverdata s3c_fb_data_64xx = {
.win[4] = &s3c_fb_data_64xx_wins[4],
};
-static struct s3c_fb_driverdata s3c_fb_data_s5pc100 = {
- .variant = {
- .nr_windows = 5,
- .vidtcon = VIDTCON0,
- .wincon = WINCON(0),
- .winmap = WINxMAP(0),
- .keycon = WKEYCON,
- .osd = VIDOSD_BASE,
- .osd_stride = 16,
- .buf_start = VIDW_BUF_START(0),
- .buf_size = VIDW_BUF_SIZE(0),
- .buf_end = VIDW_BUF_END(0),
-
- .palette = {
- [0] = 0x2400,
- [1] = 0x2800,
- [2] = 0x2c00,
- [3] = 0x3000,
- [4] = 0x3400,
- },
-
- .has_prtcon = 1,
- .has_blendcon = 1,
- .has_clksel = 1,
- },
- .win[0] = &s3c_fb_data_s5p_wins[0],
- .win[1] = &s3c_fb_data_s5p_wins[1],
- .win[2] = &s3c_fb_data_s5p_wins[2],
- .win[3] = &s3c_fb_data_s5p_wins[3],
- .win[4] = &s3c_fb_data_s5p_wins[4],
-};
-
static struct s3c_fb_driverdata s3c_fb_data_s5pv210 = {
.variant = {
.nr_windows = 5,
@@ -1975,9 +1943,6 @@ static struct platform_device_id s3c_fb_driver_ids[] = {
.name = "s3c-fb",
.driver_data = (unsigned long)&s3c_fb_data_64xx,
}, {
- .name = "s5pc100-fb",
- .driver_data = (unsigned long)&s3c_fb_data_s5pc100,
- }, {
.name = "s5pv210-fb",
.driver_data = (unsigned long)&s3c_fb_data_s5pv210,
}, {
diff --git a/include/video/samsung_fimd.h b/include/video/samsung_fimd.h
index b039320..8af0c61 100644
--- a/include/video/samsung_fimd.h
+++ b/include/video/samsung_fimd.h
@@ -107,7 +107,7 @@
#define VIDCON2_ORGYCbCr (1 << 8)
#define VIDCON2_YUVORDCrCb (1 << 7)
-/* PRTCON (S3C6410, S5PC100)
+/* PRTCON (S3C6410)
* Might not be present in the S3C6410 documentation,
* but tests prove it's there almost for sure; shouldn't hurt in any case.
*/
--
1.7.10.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 83+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 15/17] video: fbdev: s3c-fb: remove s5pc100 related fimd and fb codes
@ 2014-06-30 21:32 ` Kukjin Kim
0 siblings, 0 replies; 83+ messages in thread
From: Kukjin Kim @ 2014-06-30 21:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
This patch removes fimd and fb codes for s5pc100 SoC.
Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
Cc: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>
---
.../devicetree/bindings/video/samsung-fimd.txt | 1 -
drivers/video/fbdev/Kconfig | 2 +-
drivers/video/fbdev/s3c-fb.c | 35 --------------------
include/video/samsung_fimd.h | 2 +-
4 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/video/samsung-fimd.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/video/samsung-fimd.txt
index 741f4a6..7794260 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/video/samsung-fimd.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/video/samsung-fimd.txt
@@ -8,7 +8,6 @@ Required properties:
- compatible: value should be one of the following
"samsung,s3c2443-fimd"; /* for S3C24XX SoCs */
"samsung,s3c6400-fimd"; /* for S3C64XX SoCs */
- "samsung,s5pc100-fimd"; /* for S5PC100 SoC */
"samsung,s5pv210-fimd"; /* for S5PV210 SoC */
"samsung,exynos4210-fimd"; /* for Exynos4 SoCs */
"samsung,exynos5250-fimd"; /* for Exynos5 SoCs */
diff --git a/drivers/video/fbdev/Kconfig b/drivers/video/fbdev/Kconfig
index 11506e5..79708b2 100644
--- a/drivers/video/fbdev/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/video/fbdev/Kconfig
@@ -2019,7 +2019,7 @@ config FB_TMIO_ACCELL
config FB_S3C
tristate "Samsung S3C framebuffer support"
depends on FB && (CPU_S3C2416 || ARCH_S3C64XX || \
- ARCH_S5PC100 || ARCH_S5PV210 || ARCH_EXYNOS)
+ ARCH_S5PV210 || ARCH_EXYNOS)
select FB_CFB_FILLRECT
select FB_CFB_COPYAREA
select FB_CFB_IMAGEBLIT
diff --git a/drivers/video/fbdev/s3c-fb.c b/drivers/video/fbdev/s3c-fb.c
index a0cde41..b33abb0 100644
--- a/drivers/video/fbdev/s3c-fb.c
+++ b/drivers/video/fbdev/s3c-fb.c
@@ -1805,38 +1805,6 @@ static struct s3c_fb_driverdata s3c_fb_data_64xx = {
.win[4] = &s3c_fb_data_64xx_wins[4],
};
-static struct s3c_fb_driverdata s3c_fb_data_s5pc100 = {
- .variant = {
- .nr_windows = 5,
- .vidtcon = VIDTCON0,
- .wincon = WINCON(0),
- .winmap = WINxMAP(0),
- .keycon = WKEYCON,
- .osd = VIDOSD_BASE,
- .osd_stride = 16,
- .buf_start = VIDW_BUF_START(0),
- .buf_size = VIDW_BUF_SIZE(0),
- .buf_end = VIDW_BUF_END(0),
-
- .palette = {
- [0] = 0x2400,
- [1] = 0x2800,
- [2] = 0x2c00,
- [3] = 0x3000,
- [4] = 0x3400,
- },
-
- .has_prtcon = 1,
- .has_blendcon = 1,
- .has_clksel = 1,
- },
- .win[0] = &s3c_fb_data_s5p_wins[0],
- .win[1] = &s3c_fb_data_s5p_wins[1],
- .win[2] = &s3c_fb_data_s5p_wins[2],
- .win[3] = &s3c_fb_data_s5p_wins[3],
- .win[4] = &s3c_fb_data_s5p_wins[4],
-};
-
static struct s3c_fb_driverdata s3c_fb_data_s5pv210 = {
.variant = {
.nr_windows = 5,
@@ -1975,9 +1943,6 @@ static struct platform_device_id s3c_fb_driver_ids[] = {
.name = "s3c-fb",
.driver_data = (unsigned long)&s3c_fb_data_64xx,
}, {
- .name = "s5pc100-fb",
- .driver_data = (unsigned long)&s3c_fb_data_s5pc100,
- }, {
.name = "s5pv210-fb",
.driver_data = (unsigned long)&s3c_fb_data_s5pv210,
}, {
diff --git a/include/video/samsung_fimd.h b/include/video/samsung_fimd.h
index b039320..8af0c61 100644
--- a/include/video/samsung_fimd.h
+++ b/include/video/samsung_fimd.h
@@ -107,7 +107,7 @@
#define VIDCON2_ORGYCbCr (1 << 8)
#define VIDCON2_YUVORDCrCb (1 << 7)
-/* PRTCON (S3C6410, S5PC100)
+/* PRTCON (S3C6410)
* Might not be present in the S3C6410 documentation,
* but tests prove it's there almost for sure; shouldn't hurt in any case.
*/
--
1.7.10.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 83+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 16/17] [media] exynos4-is: removes s5pc100 related fimc codes
2014-06-30 21:32 ` Kukjin Kim
@ 2014-06-30 21:32 ` Kukjin Kim
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 83+ messages in thread
From: Kukjin Kim @ 2014-06-30 21:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel, linux-samsung-soc
Cc: Kukjin Kim, Sylwester Nawrocki, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
This patch removes s5pc100 related fimc codes because of no more support
S5PC100 SoC in mainline.
Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
Cc: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com>
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <m.chehab@samsung.com>
---
Documentation/video4linux/fimc.txt | 2 +-
drivers/media/platform/exynos4-is/fimc-core.c | 15 ---------------
2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/video4linux/fimc.txt b/Documentation/video4linux/fimc.txt
index e0c6b8b..1441fcf 100644
--- a/Documentation/video4linux/fimc.txt
+++ b/Documentation/video4linux/fimc.txt
@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ drivers/media/platform/exynos4-is directory.
1. Supported SoCs
=================
-S5PC100 (mem-to-mem only), S5PV210, EXYNOS4210
+S5PV210, EXYNOS4210
2. Supported features
=====================
diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/exynos4-is/fimc-core.c b/drivers/media/platform/exynos4-is/fimc-core.c
index b70fd99..5c800b4 100644
--- a/drivers/media/platform/exynos4-is/fimc-core.c
+++ b/drivers/media/platform/exynos4-is/fimc-core.c
@@ -1204,18 +1204,6 @@ static const struct fimc_variant fimc2_variant_s5pv210 = {
.pix_limit = &s5p_pix_limit[2],
};
-/* S5PC100 */
-static const struct fimc_drvdata fimc_drvdata_s5p = {
- .variant = {
- [0] = &fimc0_variant_s5p,
- [1] = &fimc0_variant_s5p,
- [2] = &fimc2_variant_s5p,
- },
- .num_entities = 3,
- .lclk_frequency = 133000000UL,
- .out_buf_count = 4,
-};
-
/* S5PV210, S5PC110 */
static const struct fimc_drvdata fimc_drvdata_s5pv210 = {
.variant = {
@@ -1251,9 +1239,6 @@ static const struct fimc_drvdata fimc_drvdata_exynos4x12 = {
static const struct platform_device_id fimc_driver_ids[] = {
{
- .name = "s5p-fimc",
- .driver_data = (unsigned long)&fimc_drvdata_s5p,
- }, {
.name = "s5pv210-fimc",
.driver_data = (unsigned long)&fimc_drvdata_s5pv210,
}, {
--
1.7.10.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 83+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 16/17] [media] exynos4-is: removes s5pc100 related fimc codes
@ 2014-06-30 21:32 ` Kukjin Kim
0 siblings, 0 replies; 83+ messages in thread
From: Kukjin Kim @ 2014-06-30 21:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
This patch removes s5pc100 related fimc codes because of no more support
S5PC100 SoC in mainline.
Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
Cc: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com>
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <m.chehab@samsung.com>
---
Documentation/video4linux/fimc.txt | 2 +-
drivers/media/platform/exynos4-is/fimc-core.c | 15 ---------------
2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/video4linux/fimc.txt b/Documentation/video4linux/fimc.txt
index e0c6b8b..1441fcf 100644
--- a/Documentation/video4linux/fimc.txt
+++ b/Documentation/video4linux/fimc.txt
@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ drivers/media/platform/exynos4-is directory.
1. Supported SoCs
=================
-S5PC100 (mem-to-mem only), S5PV210, EXYNOS4210
+S5PV210, EXYNOS4210
2. Supported features
=====================
diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/exynos4-is/fimc-core.c b/drivers/media/platform/exynos4-is/fimc-core.c
index b70fd99..5c800b4 100644
--- a/drivers/media/platform/exynos4-is/fimc-core.c
+++ b/drivers/media/platform/exynos4-is/fimc-core.c
@@ -1204,18 +1204,6 @@ static const struct fimc_variant fimc2_variant_s5pv210 = {
.pix_limit = &s5p_pix_limit[2],
};
-/* S5PC100 */
-static const struct fimc_drvdata fimc_drvdata_s5p = {
- .variant = {
- [0] = &fimc0_variant_s5p,
- [1] = &fimc0_variant_s5p,
- [2] = &fimc2_variant_s5p,
- },
- .num_entities = 3,
- .lclk_frequency = 133000000UL,
- .out_buf_count = 4,
-};
-
/* S5PV210, S5PC110 */
static const struct fimc_drvdata fimc_drvdata_s5pv210 = {
.variant = {
@@ -1251,9 +1239,6 @@ static const struct fimc_drvdata fimc_drvdata_exynos4x12 = {
static const struct platform_device_id fimc_driver_ids[] = {
{
- .name = "s5p-fimc",
- .driver_data = (unsigned long)&fimc_drvdata_s5p,
- }, {
.name = "s5pv210-fimc",
.driver_data = (unsigned long)&fimc_drvdata_s5pv210,
}, {
--
1.7.10.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 83+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 17/17] ASoC: Samsung: remove s5pc100 related codes
2014-06-30 21:32 ` Kukjin Kim
@ 2014-06-30 21:32 ` Kukjin Kim
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 83+ messages in thread
From: Kukjin Kim @ 2014-06-30 21:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel, linux-samsung-soc; +Cc: Kukjin Kim, Mark Brown
This patch removes s5pc100 related codes in
<linux/platform_data/asoc-s3c.h>.
Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@linaro.org>
---
include/linux/platform_data/asoc-s3c.h | 9 ---------
1 file changed, 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/platform_data/asoc-s3c.h b/include/linux/platform_data/asoc-s3c.h
index 709c6f7..a6591c6 100644
--- a/include/linux/platform_data/asoc-s3c.h
+++ b/include/linux/platform_data/asoc-s3c.h
@@ -15,15 +15,6 @@
#define S3C64XX_AC97_GPE 1
extern void s3c64xx_ac97_setup_gpio(int);
-/*
- * The machine init code calls s5p*_spdif_setup_gpio with
- * one of these defines in order to select appropriate bank
- * of GPIO for S/PDIF pins
- */
-#define S5PC100_SPDIF_GPD 0
-#define S5PC100_SPDIF_GPG3 1
-extern void s5pc100_spdif_setup_gpio(int);
-
struct samsung_i2s {
/* If the Primary DAI has 5.1 Channels */
#define QUIRK_PRI_6CHAN (1 << 0)
--
1.7.10.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 83+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 17/17] ASoC: Samsung: remove s5pc100 related codes
@ 2014-06-30 21:32 ` Kukjin Kim
0 siblings, 0 replies; 83+ messages in thread
From: Kukjin Kim @ 2014-06-30 21:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
This patch removes s5pc100 related codes in
<linux/platform_data/asoc-s3c.h>.
Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@linaro.org>
---
include/linux/platform_data/asoc-s3c.h | 9 ---------
1 file changed, 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/platform_data/asoc-s3c.h b/include/linux/platform_data/asoc-s3c.h
index 709c6f7..a6591c6 100644
--- a/include/linux/platform_data/asoc-s3c.h
+++ b/include/linux/platform_data/asoc-s3c.h
@@ -15,15 +15,6 @@
#define S3C64XX_AC97_GPE 1
extern void s3c64xx_ac97_setup_gpio(int);
-/*
- * The machine init code calls s5p*_spdif_setup_gpio with
- * one of these defines in order to select appropriate bank
- * of GPIO for S/PDIF pins
- */
-#define S5PC100_SPDIF_GPD 0
-#define S5PC100_SPDIF_GPG3 1
-extern void s5pc100_spdif_setup_gpio(int);
-
struct samsung_i2s {
/* If the Primary DAI has 5.1 Channels */
#define QUIRK_PRI_6CHAN (1 << 0)
--
1.7.10.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 83+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 06/17] video: fbdev: s3c-fb: remove s5p64x0 related fimd codes
2014-06-30 21:32 ` Kukjin Kim
@ 2014-07-01 2:04 ` Jingoo Han
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 83+ messages in thread
From: Jingoo Han @ 2014-07-01 2:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 'Kukjin Kim'
Cc: linux-arm-kernel, linux-samsung-soc, 'Tomi Valkeinen',
'Jingoo Han'
On Tuesday, July 01, 2014 6:32 AM, Kukjin Kim wrote:
>
> This patch removes fimd codes for s5p6440 and s5p6450 SoCs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
> Cc: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>
Acked-by: Jingoo Han <jg1.han@samsung.com>
Best regards,
Jingoo Han
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/video/samsung-fimd.txt | 1 -
> drivers/video/fbdev/Kconfig | 2 +-
> drivers/video/fbdev/s3c-fb.c | 30 --------------------
> 3 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 32 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/video/samsung-fimd.txt
> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/video/samsung-fimd.txt
> index 2dad41b..741f4a6 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/video/samsung-fimd.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/video/samsung-fimd.txt
> @@ -8,7 +8,6 @@ Required properties:
> - compatible: value should be one of the following
> "samsung,s3c2443-fimd"; /* for S3C24XX SoCs */
> "samsung,s3c6400-fimd"; /* for S3C64XX SoCs */
> - "samsung,s5p6440-fimd"; /* for S5P64X0 SoCs */
> "samsung,s5pc100-fimd"; /* for S5PC100 SoC */
> "samsung,s5pv210-fimd"; /* for S5PV210 SoC */
> "samsung,exynos4210-fimd"; /* for Exynos4 SoCs */
> diff --git a/drivers/video/fbdev/Kconfig b/drivers/video/fbdev/Kconfig
> index 59c98bfd..11506e5 100644
> --- a/drivers/video/fbdev/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/video/fbdev/Kconfig
> @@ -2018,7 +2018,7 @@ config FB_TMIO_ACCELL
>
> config FB_S3C
> tristate "Samsung S3C framebuffer support"
> - depends on FB && (CPU_S3C2416 || ARCH_S3C64XX || ARCH_S5P64X0 || \
> + depends on FB && (CPU_S3C2416 || ARCH_S3C64XX || \
> ARCH_S5PC100 || ARCH_S5PV210 || ARCH_EXYNOS)
> select FB_CFB_FILLRECT
> select FB_CFB_COPYAREA
> diff --git a/drivers/video/fbdev/s3c-fb.c b/drivers/video/fbdev/s3c-fb.c
> index 62acae2..a0cde41 100644
> --- a/drivers/video/fbdev/s3c-fb.c
> +++ b/drivers/video/fbdev/s3c-fb.c
> @@ -1970,33 +1970,6 @@ static struct s3c_fb_driverdata s3c_fb_data_s3c2443 = {
> },
> };
>
> -static struct s3c_fb_driverdata s3c_fb_data_s5p64x0 = {
> - .variant = {
> - .nr_windows = 3,
> - .vidtcon = VIDTCON0,
> - .wincon = WINCON(0),
> - .winmap = WINxMAP(0),
> - .keycon = WKEYCON,
> - .osd = VIDOSD_BASE,
> - .osd_stride = 16,
> - .buf_start = VIDW_BUF_START(0),
> - .buf_size = VIDW_BUF_SIZE(0),
> - .buf_end = VIDW_BUF_END(0),
> -
> - .palette = {
> - [0] = 0x2400,
> - [1] = 0x2800,
> - [2] = 0x2c00,
> - },
> -
> - .has_blendcon = 1,
> - .has_fixvclk = 1,
> - },
> - .win[0] = &s3c_fb_data_s5p_wins[0],
> - .win[1] = &s3c_fb_data_s5p_wins[1],
> - .win[2] = &s3c_fb_data_s5p_wins[2],
> -};
> -
> static struct platform_device_id s3c_fb_driver_ids[] = {
> {
> .name = "s3c-fb",
> @@ -2016,9 +1989,6 @@ static struct platform_device_id s3c_fb_driver_ids[] = {
> }, {
> .name = "s3c2443-fb",
> .driver_data = (unsigned long)&s3c_fb_data_s3c2443,
> - }, {
> - .name = "s5p64x0-fb",
> - .driver_data = (unsigned long)&s3c_fb_data_s5p64x0,
> },
> {},
> };
> --
> 1.7.10.4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 83+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 06/17] video: fbdev: s3c-fb: remove s5p64x0 related fimd codes
@ 2014-07-01 2:04 ` Jingoo Han
0 siblings, 0 replies; 83+ messages in thread
From: Jingoo Han @ 2014-07-01 2:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On Tuesday, July 01, 2014 6:32 AM, Kukjin Kim wrote:
>
> This patch removes fimd codes for s5p6440 and s5p6450 SoCs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
> Cc: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>
Acked-by: Jingoo Han <jg1.han@samsung.com>
Best regards,
Jingoo Han
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/video/samsung-fimd.txt | 1 -
> drivers/video/fbdev/Kconfig | 2 +-
> drivers/video/fbdev/s3c-fb.c | 30 --------------------
> 3 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 32 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/video/samsung-fimd.txt
> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/video/samsung-fimd.txt
> index 2dad41b..741f4a6 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/video/samsung-fimd.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/video/samsung-fimd.txt
> @@ -8,7 +8,6 @@ Required properties:
> - compatible: value should be one of the following
> "samsung,s3c2443-fimd"; /* for S3C24XX SoCs */
> "samsung,s3c6400-fimd"; /* for S3C64XX SoCs */
> - "samsung,s5p6440-fimd"; /* for S5P64X0 SoCs */
> "samsung,s5pc100-fimd"; /* for S5PC100 SoC */
> "samsung,s5pv210-fimd"; /* for S5PV210 SoC */
> "samsung,exynos4210-fimd"; /* for Exynos4 SoCs */
> diff --git a/drivers/video/fbdev/Kconfig b/drivers/video/fbdev/Kconfig
> index 59c98bfd..11506e5 100644
> --- a/drivers/video/fbdev/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/video/fbdev/Kconfig
> @@ -2018,7 +2018,7 @@ config FB_TMIO_ACCELL
>
> config FB_S3C
> tristate "Samsung S3C framebuffer support"
> - depends on FB && (CPU_S3C2416 || ARCH_S3C64XX || ARCH_S5P64X0 || \
> + depends on FB && (CPU_S3C2416 || ARCH_S3C64XX || \
> ARCH_S5PC100 || ARCH_S5PV210 || ARCH_EXYNOS)
> select FB_CFB_FILLRECT
> select FB_CFB_COPYAREA
> diff --git a/drivers/video/fbdev/s3c-fb.c b/drivers/video/fbdev/s3c-fb.c
> index 62acae2..a0cde41 100644
> --- a/drivers/video/fbdev/s3c-fb.c
> +++ b/drivers/video/fbdev/s3c-fb.c
> @@ -1970,33 +1970,6 @@ static struct s3c_fb_driverdata s3c_fb_data_s3c2443 = {
> },
> };
>
> -static struct s3c_fb_driverdata s3c_fb_data_s5p64x0 = {
> - .variant = {
> - .nr_windows = 3,
> - .vidtcon = VIDTCON0,
> - .wincon = WINCON(0),
> - .winmap = WINxMAP(0),
> - .keycon = WKEYCON,
> - .osd = VIDOSD_BASE,
> - .osd_stride = 16,
> - .buf_start = VIDW_BUF_START(0),
> - .buf_size = VIDW_BUF_SIZE(0),
> - .buf_end = VIDW_BUF_END(0),
> -
> - .palette = {
> - [0] = 0x2400,
> - [1] = 0x2800,
> - [2] = 0x2c00,
> - },
> -
> - .has_blendcon = 1,
> - .has_fixvclk = 1,
> - },
> - .win[0] = &s3c_fb_data_s5p_wins[0],
> - .win[1] = &s3c_fb_data_s5p_wins[1],
> - .win[2] = &s3c_fb_data_s5p_wins[2],
> -};
> -
> static struct platform_device_id s3c_fb_driver_ids[] = {
> {
> .name = "s3c-fb",
> @@ -2016,9 +1989,6 @@ static struct platform_device_id s3c_fb_driver_ids[] = {
> }, {
> .name = "s3c2443-fb",
> .driver_data = (unsigned long)&s3c_fb_data_s3c2443,
> - }, {
> - .name = "s5p64x0-fb",
> - .driver_data = (unsigned long)&s3c_fb_data_s5p64x0,
> },
> {},
> };
> --
> 1.7.10.4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 83+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 15/17] video: fbdev: s3c-fb: remove s5pc100 related fimd and fb codes
2014-06-30 21:32 ` Kukjin Kim
@ 2014-07-01 2:05 ` Jingoo Han
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 83+ messages in thread
From: Jingoo Han @ 2014-07-01 2:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 'Kukjin Kim'
Cc: linux-arm-kernel, linux-samsung-soc, 'Tomi Valkeinen',
'Jingoo Han'
On Tuesday, July 01, 2014 6:32 AM, Kukjin Kim wrote:
>
> This patch removes fimd and fb codes for s5pc100 SoC.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
> Cc: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>
Acked-by: Jingoo Han <jg1.han@samsung.com>
Best regards,
Jingoo Han
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/video/samsung-fimd.txt | 1 -
> drivers/video/fbdev/Kconfig | 2 +-
> drivers/video/fbdev/s3c-fb.c | 35 --------------------
> include/video/samsung_fimd.h | 2 +-
> 4 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/video/samsung-fimd.txt
> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/video/samsung-fimd.txt
> index 741f4a6..7794260 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/video/samsung-fimd.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/video/samsung-fimd.txt
> @@ -8,7 +8,6 @@ Required properties:
> - compatible: value should be one of the following
> "samsung,s3c2443-fimd"; /* for S3C24XX SoCs */
> "samsung,s3c6400-fimd"; /* for S3C64XX SoCs */
> - "samsung,s5pc100-fimd"; /* for S5PC100 SoC */
> "samsung,s5pv210-fimd"; /* for S5PV210 SoC */
> "samsung,exynos4210-fimd"; /* for Exynos4 SoCs */
> "samsung,exynos5250-fimd"; /* for Exynos5 SoCs */
> diff --git a/drivers/video/fbdev/Kconfig b/drivers/video/fbdev/Kconfig
> index 11506e5..79708b2 100644
> --- a/drivers/video/fbdev/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/video/fbdev/Kconfig
> @@ -2019,7 +2019,7 @@ config FB_TMIO_ACCELL
> config FB_S3C
> tristate "Samsung S3C framebuffer support"
> depends on FB && (CPU_S3C2416 || ARCH_S3C64XX || \
> - ARCH_S5PC100 || ARCH_S5PV210 || ARCH_EXYNOS)
> + ARCH_S5PV210 || ARCH_EXYNOS)
> select FB_CFB_FILLRECT
> select FB_CFB_COPYAREA
> select FB_CFB_IMAGEBLIT
> diff --git a/drivers/video/fbdev/s3c-fb.c b/drivers/video/fbdev/s3c-fb.c
> index a0cde41..b33abb0 100644
> --- a/drivers/video/fbdev/s3c-fb.c
> +++ b/drivers/video/fbdev/s3c-fb.c
> @@ -1805,38 +1805,6 @@ static struct s3c_fb_driverdata s3c_fb_data_64xx = {
> .win[4] = &s3c_fb_data_64xx_wins[4],
> };
>
> -static struct s3c_fb_driverdata s3c_fb_data_s5pc100 = {
> - .variant = {
> - .nr_windows = 5,
> - .vidtcon = VIDTCON0,
> - .wincon = WINCON(0),
> - .winmap = WINxMAP(0),
> - .keycon = WKEYCON,
> - .osd = VIDOSD_BASE,
> - .osd_stride = 16,
> - .buf_start = VIDW_BUF_START(0),
> - .buf_size = VIDW_BUF_SIZE(0),
> - .buf_end = VIDW_BUF_END(0),
> -
> - .palette = {
> - [0] = 0x2400,
> - [1] = 0x2800,
> - [2] = 0x2c00,
> - [3] = 0x3000,
> - [4] = 0x3400,
> - },
> -
> - .has_prtcon = 1,
> - .has_blendcon = 1,
> - .has_clksel = 1,
> - },
> - .win[0] = &s3c_fb_data_s5p_wins[0],
> - .win[1] = &s3c_fb_data_s5p_wins[1],
> - .win[2] = &s3c_fb_data_s5p_wins[2],
> - .win[3] = &s3c_fb_data_s5p_wins[3],
> - .win[4] = &s3c_fb_data_s5p_wins[4],
> -};
> -
> static struct s3c_fb_driverdata s3c_fb_data_s5pv210 = {
> .variant = {
> .nr_windows = 5,
> @@ -1975,9 +1943,6 @@ static struct platform_device_id s3c_fb_driver_ids[] = {
> .name = "s3c-fb",
> .driver_data = (unsigned long)&s3c_fb_data_64xx,
> }, {
> - .name = "s5pc100-fb",
> - .driver_data = (unsigned long)&s3c_fb_data_s5pc100,
> - }, {
> .name = "s5pv210-fb",
> .driver_data = (unsigned long)&s3c_fb_data_s5pv210,
> }, {
> diff --git a/include/video/samsung_fimd.h b/include/video/samsung_fimd.h
> index b039320..8af0c61 100644
> --- a/include/video/samsung_fimd.h
> +++ b/include/video/samsung_fimd.h
> @@ -107,7 +107,7 @@
> #define VIDCON2_ORGYCbCr (1 << 8)
> #define VIDCON2_YUVORDCrCb (1 << 7)
>
> -/* PRTCON (S3C6410, S5PC100)
> +/* PRTCON (S3C6410)
> * Might not be present in the S3C6410 documentation,
> * but tests prove it's there almost for sure; shouldn't hurt in any case.
> */
> --
> 1.7.10.4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 83+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 15/17] video: fbdev: s3c-fb: remove s5pc100 related fimd and fb codes
@ 2014-07-01 2:05 ` Jingoo Han
0 siblings, 0 replies; 83+ messages in thread
From: Jingoo Han @ 2014-07-01 2:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On Tuesday, July 01, 2014 6:32 AM, Kukjin Kim wrote:
>
> This patch removes fimd and fb codes for s5pc100 SoC.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
> Cc: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>
Acked-by: Jingoo Han <jg1.han@samsung.com>
Best regards,
Jingoo Han
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/video/samsung-fimd.txt | 1 -
> drivers/video/fbdev/Kconfig | 2 +-
> drivers/video/fbdev/s3c-fb.c | 35 --------------------
> include/video/samsung_fimd.h | 2 +-
> 4 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/video/samsung-fimd.txt
> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/video/samsung-fimd.txt
> index 741f4a6..7794260 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/video/samsung-fimd.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/video/samsung-fimd.txt
> @@ -8,7 +8,6 @@ Required properties:
> - compatible: value should be one of the following
> "samsung,s3c2443-fimd"; /* for S3C24XX SoCs */
> "samsung,s3c6400-fimd"; /* for S3C64XX SoCs */
> - "samsung,s5pc100-fimd"; /* for S5PC100 SoC */
> "samsung,s5pv210-fimd"; /* for S5PV210 SoC */
> "samsung,exynos4210-fimd"; /* for Exynos4 SoCs */
> "samsung,exynos5250-fimd"; /* for Exynos5 SoCs */
> diff --git a/drivers/video/fbdev/Kconfig b/drivers/video/fbdev/Kconfig
> index 11506e5..79708b2 100644
> --- a/drivers/video/fbdev/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/video/fbdev/Kconfig
> @@ -2019,7 +2019,7 @@ config FB_TMIO_ACCELL
> config FB_S3C
> tristate "Samsung S3C framebuffer support"
> depends on FB && (CPU_S3C2416 || ARCH_S3C64XX || \
> - ARCH_S5PC100 || ARCH_S5PV210 || ARCH_EXYNOS)
> + ARCH_S5PV210 || ARCH_EXYNOS)
> select FB_CFB_FILLRECT
> select FB_CFB_COPYAREA
> select FB_CFB_IMAGEBLIT
> diff --git a/drivers/video/fbdev/s3c-fb.c b/drivers/video/fbdev/s3c-fb.c
> index a0cde41..b33abb0 100644
> --- a/drivers/video/fbdev/s3c-fb.c
> +++ b/drivers/video/fbdev/s3c-fb.c
> @@ -1805,38 +1805,6 @@ static struct s3c_fb_driverdata s3c_fb_data_64xx = {
> .win[4] = &s3c_fb_data_64xx_wins[4],
> };
>
> -static struct s3c_fb_driverdata s3c_fb_data_s5pc100 = {
> - .variant = {
> - .nr_windows = 5,
> - .vidtcon = VIDTCON0,
> - .wincon = WINCON(0),
> - .winmap = WINxMAP(0),
> - .keycon = WKEYCON,
> - .osd = VIDOSD_BASE,
> - .osd_stride = 16,
> - .buf_start = VIDW_BUF_START(0),
> - .buf_size = VIDW_BUF_SIZE(0),
> - .buf_end = VIDW_BUF_END(0),
> -
> - .palette = {
> - [0] = 0x2400,
> - [1] = 0x2800,
> - [2] = 0x2c00,
> - [3] = 0x3000,
> - [4] = 0x3400,
> - },
> -
> - .has_prtcon = 1,
> - .has_blendcon = 1,
> - .has_clksel = 1,
> - },
> - .win[0] = &s3c_fb_data_s5p_wins[0],
> - .win[1] = &s3c_fb_data_s5p_wins[1],
> - .win[2] = &s3c_fb_data_s5p_wins[2],
> - .win[3] = &s3c_fb_data_s5p_wins[3],
> - .win[4] = &s3c_fb_data_s5p_wins[4],
> -};
> -
> static struct s3c_fb_driverdata s3c_fb_data_s5pv210 = {
> .variant = {
> .nr_windows = 5,
> @@ -1975,9 +1943,6 @@ static struct platform_device_id s3c_fb_driver_ids[] = {
> .name = "s3c-fb",
> .driver_data = (unsigned long)&s3c_fb_data_64xx,
> }, {
> - .name = "s5pc100-fb",
> - .driver_data = (unsigned long)&s3c_fb_data_s5pc100,
> - }, {
> .name = "s5pv210-fb",
> .driver_data = (unsigned long)&s3c_fb_data_s5pv210,
> }, {
> diff --git a/include/video/samsung_fimd.h b/include/video/samsung_fimd.h
> index b039320..8af0c61 100644
> --- a/include/video/samsung_fimd.h
> +++ b/include/video/samsung_fimd.h
> @@ -107,7 +107,7 @@
> #define VIDCON2_ORGYCbCr (1 << 8)
> #define VIDCON2_YUVORDCrCb (1 << 7)
>
> -/* PRTCON (S3C6410, S5PC100)
> +/* PRTCON (S3C6410)
> * Might not be present in the S3C6410 documentation,
> * but tests prove it's there almost for sure; shouldn't hurt in any case.
> */
> --
> 1.7.10.4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 83+ messages in thread
* RE: [PATCH 00/17] ARM: S5P64X0, S5PC100: no more support in mainline
2014-06-30 15:31 ` Tushar Behera
@ 2014-07-01 2:08 ` Kukjin Kim
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 83+ messages in thread
From: Kukjin Kim @ 2014-07-01 2:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 'Tushar Behera', linux-arm-kernel, linux-samsung-soc
Tushar Behera wrote:
>
> On 07/01/2014 03:02 AM, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> > This series removes S5P64X0 and S5PC100 related codes in mainline,
> > because no more user now. And if its supporting is required later,
> > it will be done with using device tree.
> >
> > [PATCH 01/17] ARM: S5P64X0: no more support S5P6440 and S5P6450 SoCs
> > [PATCH 02/17] gpio: samsung: remove s5p64x0 related gpio codes
> > [PATCH 03/17] spi: s3c64xx: remove s5p64x0 related spi codes
> > [PATCH 04/17] ASoC: samsung: no more support for S5P6440 and S5P6450
> > [PATCH 05/17] pwm: samsung: remove s5p64x0 related pwm codes
> > [PATCH 06/17] video: fbdev: s3c-fb: remove s5p64x0 related fimd
> > [PATCH 07/17] serial: samsung: no more support for S5P6440 and
> > [PATCH 08/17] ARM: S5PC100: no more support S5PC100 SoC
> > [PATCH 09/17] gpio: samsung: remov s5pc100 related gpio codes
> > [PATCH 10/17] spi: s3c64xx: remove s5pc100 related spi codes
> > [PATCH 11/17] pwm: samsung: remove s5pc100 related pwm codes
> > [PATCH 12/17] serial: samsung: no more support for S5PC100 SoC
> > [PATCH 13/17] ata: pata_samsung_cf: removes s5pc100 related ata
> > [PATCH 14/17] mtd: onenand: remove s5pc100 related onenand codes
> > [PATCH 15/17] video: fbdev: s3c-fb: remove s5pc100 related fimd and
> > [PATCH 16/17] [media] exynos4-is: removes s5pc100 related fimc codes
> > [PATCH 17/17] ASoC: Samsung: remove s5pc100 related codes
> >
>
> One more reference to S5PC100 can be found at drivers/irqchip/Kconfig.
>
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig b/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig
> index 131f185..9f39cc6 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig
> @@ -23,7 +23,6 @@ config ARM_VIC
> config ARM_VIC_NR
> int
> default 4 if ARCH_S5PV210
> - default 3 if ARCH_S5PC100
> default 2
> depends on ARM_VIC
> help
Tushar, thanks.
BTW, it should be included in 8/17 patch. But not shown in mailing list because
of
big changes so I'm resending 1/17 and 8/17 now after re-creating as per Arnd's
suggestion.
Thanks,
Kukjin
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 83+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 00/17] ARM: S5P64X0, S5PC100: no more support in mainline
@ 2014-07-01 2:08 ` Kukjin Kim
0 siblings, 0 replies; 83+ messages in thread
From: Kukjin Kim @ 2014-07-01 2:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
Tushar Behera wrote:
>
> On 07/01/2014 03:02 AM, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> > This series removes S5P64X0 and S5PC100 related codes in mainline,
> > because no more user now. And if its supporting is required later,
> > it will be done with using device tree.
> >
> > [PATCH 01/17] ARM: S5P64X0: no more support S5P6440 and S5P6450 SoCs
> > [PATCH 02/17] gpio: samsung: remove s5p64x0 related gpio codes
> > [PATCH 03/17] spi: s3c64xx: remove s5p64x0 related spi codes
> > [PATCH 04/17] ASoC: samsung: no more support for S5P6440 and S5P6450
> > [PATCH 05/17] pwm: samsung: remove s5p64x0 related pwm codes
> > [PATCH 06/17] video: fbdev: s3c-fb: remove s5p64x0 related fimd
> > [PATCH 07/17] serial: samsung: no more support for S5P6440 and
> > [PATCH 08/17] ARM: S5PC100: no more support S5PC100 SoC
> > [PATCH 09/17] gpio: samsung: remov s5pc100 related gpio codes
> > [PATCH 10/17] spi: s3c64xx: remove s5pc100 related spi codes
> > [PATCH 11/17] pwm: samsung: remove s5pc100 related pwm codes
> > [PATCH 12/17] serial: samsung: no more support for S5PC100 SoC
> > [PATCH 13/17] ata: pata_samsung_cf: removes s5pc100 related ata
> > [PATCH 14/17] mtd: onenand: remove s5pc100 related onenand codes
> > [PATCH 15/17] video: fbdev: s3c-fb: remove s5pc100 related fimd and
> > [PATCH 16/17] [media] exynos4-is: removes s5pc100 related fimc codes
> > [PATCH 17/17] ASoC: Samsung: remove s5pc100 related codes
> >
>
> One more reference to S5PC100 can be found at drivers/irqchip/Kconfig.
>
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig b/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig
> index 131f185..9f39cc6 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/Kconfig
> @@ -23,7 +23,6 @@ config ARM_VIC
> config ARM_VIC_NR
> int
> default 4 if ARCH_S5PV210
> - default 3 if ARCH_S5PC100
> default 2
> depends on ARM_VIC
> help
Tushar, thanks.
BTW, it should be included in 8/17 patch. But not shown in mailing list because
of
big changes so I'm resending 1/17 and 8/17 now after re-creating as per Arnd's
suggestion.
Thanks,
Kukjin
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 83+ messages in thread
* RE: [PATCH 00/17] ARM: S5P64X0, S5PC100: no more support in mainline
2014-06-30 14:31 ` Arnd Bergmann
@ 2014-07-01 2:08 ` Kukjin Kim
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 83+ messages in thread
From: Kukjin Kim @ 2014-07-01 2:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 'Arnd Bergmann', linux-arm-kernel
Cc: 'Thierry Reding', linux-samsung-soc
Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
> On Monday 30 June 2014 16:22:25 Thierry Reding wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 03:34:27PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 01 July 2014 06:32:10 Kukjin Kim wrote:
> > > > This series removes S5P64X0 and S5PC100 related codes in mainline,
> > > > because no more user now. And if its supporting is required later,
> > > > it will be done with using device tree.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> >
> > It seems like I'm not completely up-to-date. What happened to our prime
> > directive never to remove support for boards? Why is this special? What
> > about people that still use this hardware? The commit message says that
> > there are no longer any users. How was this determined?
>
I asked whether we may remove its supporting in mainline before not just one
time and then no objection at that time...
> From what I can tell, the supported machines on these two platforms are
> all the official development prototypes, not production boards, and they
> came out in rather small quantities, probably Samsung-internal for the
> most part. The maintainers have previously assured me they are not aware
> of anybody using it, and I trust their judgment.
>
Yeah, I think so ;-)
> I'm totally fine with removing support for these machines, and we have
> removed a number of similar platforms in the past. The rule is not that
S5P6442. I did commit a73ddc61 'ARM: S5P6442: Removing ARCH_S5P6442' in 2011
because that could not be mass-produced.
> we never remove stuff, the rule is that we never break things for
> active users.
>
YES.
> As always, if it turns out that we missed some active users, we will
> revert these patches, or bring support back another way.
>
Sure, so please let us know if you have any objection on this removing.
> This should probably all be spelled out explicitly in the changelog
> for patch 1, which I admit I have not seen.
>
It's my fault, sorry I forgot it and I'm resending 1/17 and 8/17 with -D.
Thanks,
Kukjin
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 83+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 00/17] ARM: S5P64X0, S5PC100: no more support in mainline
@ 2014-07-01 2:08 ` Kukjin Kim
0 siblings, 0 replies; 83+ messages in thread
From: Kukjin Kim @ 2014-07-01 2:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
> On Monday 30 June 2014 16:22:25 Thierry Reding wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 03:34:27PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 01 July 2014 06:32:10 Kukjin Kim wrote:
> > > > This series removes S5P64X0 and S5PC100 related codes in mainline,
> > > > because no more user now. And if its supporting is required later,
> > > > it will be done with using device tree.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> >
> > It seems like I'm not completely up-to-date. What happened to our prime
> > directive never to remove support for boards? Why is this special? What
> > about people that still use this hardware? The commit message says that
> > there are no longer any users. How was this determined?
>
I asked whether we may remove its supporting in mainline before not just one
time and then no objection at that time...
> From what I can tell, the supported machines on these two platforms are
> all the official development prototypes, not production boards, and they
> came out in rather small quantities, probably Samsung-internal for the
> most part. The maintainers have previously assured me they are not aware
> of anybody using it, and I trust their judgment.
>
Yeah, I think so ;-)
> I'm totally fine with removing support for these machines, and we have
> removed a number of similar platforms in the past. The rule is not that
S5P6442. I did commit a73ddc61 'ARM: S5P6442: Removing ARCH_S5P6442' in 2011
because that could not be mass-produced.
> we never remove stuff, the rule is that we never break things for
> active users.
>
YES.
> As always, if it turns out that we missed some active users, we will
> revert these patches, or bring support back another way.
>
Sure, so please let us know if you have any objection on this removing.
> This should probably all be spelled out explicitly in the changelog
> for patch 1, which I admit I have not seen.
>
It's my fault, sorry I forgot it and I'm resending 1/17 and 8/17 with -D.
Thanks,
Kukjin
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 83+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 06/17] video: fbdev: s3c-fb: remove s5p64x0 related fimd codes
2014-06-30 21:32 ` Kukjin Kim
@ 2014-07-01 6:25 ` Tomi Valkeinen
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 83+ messages in thread
From: Tomi Valkeinen @ 2014-07-01 6:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kukjin Kim, linux-arm-kernel, linux-samsung-soc
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 699 bytes --]
On 01/07/14 00:32, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> This patch removes fimd codes for s5p6440 and s5p6450 SoCs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
> Cc: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/video/samsung-fimd.txt | 1 -
> drivers/video/fbdev/Kconfig | 2 +-
> drivers/video/fbdev/s3c-fb.c | 30 --------------------
> 3 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 32 deletions(-)
Shall I queue this and patch 15/17 via fbdev tree, or are there
dependencies and the whole series should go as one?
If the latter, for this and 15/17:
Acked-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>
Tomi
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 83+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 06/17] video: fbdev: s3c-fb: remove s5p64x0 related fimd codes
@ 2014-07-01 6:25 ` Tomi Valkeinen
0 siblings, 0 replies; 83+ messages in thread
From: Tomi Valkeinen @ 2014-07-01 6:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On 01/07/14 00:32, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> This patch removes fimd codes for s5p6440 and s5p6450 SoCs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
> Cc: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/video/samsung-fimd.txt | 1 -
> drivers/video/fbdev/Kconfig | 2 +-
> drivers/video/fbdev/s3c-fb.c | 30 --------------------
> 3 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 32 deletions(-)
Shall I queue this and patch 15/17 via fbdev tree, or are there
dependencies and the whole series should go as one?
If the latter, for this and 15/17:
Acked-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>
Tomi
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20140701/4977e75e/attachment.sig>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 83+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 00/17] ARM: S5P64X0, S5PC100: no more support in mainline
2014-06-30 21:32 ` Kukjin Kim
@ 2014-07-02 18:02 ` Tomasz Figa
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 83+ messages in thread
From: Tomasz Figa @ 2014-07-02 18:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kukjin Kim, linux-arm-kernel, linux-samsung-soc
Hi Kukjin,
On 30.06.2014 23:32, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> This series removes S5P64X0 and S5PC100 related codes in mainline,
> because no more user now. And if its supporting is required later,
> it will be done with using device tree.
>
> [PATCH 01/17] ARM: S5P64X0: no more support S5P6440 and S5P6450 SoCs
> [PATCH 02/17] gpio: samsung: remove s5p64x0 related gpio codes
> [PATCH 03/17] spi: s3c64xx: remove s5p64x0 related spi codes
> [PATCH 04/17] ASoC: samsung: no more support for S5P6440 and S5P6450
> [PATCH 05/17] pwm: samsung: remove s5p64x0 related pwm codes
> [PATCH 06/17] video: fbdev: s3c-fb: remove s5p64x0 related fimd
> [PATCH 07/17] serial: samsung: no more support for S5P6440 and
> [PATCH 08/17] ARM: S5PC100: no more support S5PC100 SoC
> [PATCH 09/17] gpio: samsung: remov s5pc100 related gpio codes
> [PATCH 10/17] spi: s3c64xx: remove s5pc100 related spi codes
> [PATCH 11/17] pwm: samsung: remove s5pc100 related pwm codes
> [PATCH 12/17] serial: samsung: no more support for S5PC100 SoC
> [PATCH 13/17] ata: pata_samsung_cf: removes s5pc100 related ata
> [PATCH 14/17] mtd: onenand: remove s5pc100 related onenand codes
> [PATCH 15/17] video: fbdev: s3c-fb: remove s5pc100 related fimd and
> [PATCH 16/17] [media] exynos4-is: removes s5pc100 related fimc codes
> [PATCH 17/17] ASoC: Samsung: remove s5pc100 related codes
Thanks for this series.
Just letting you know that I have rebased my s5pv210 DT migration series
on top of this and will be sending the patches after some more testing.
Best regards,
Tomasz
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 83+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 00/17] ARM: S5P64X0, S5PC100: no more support in mainline
@ 2014-07-02 18:02 ` Tomasz Figa
0 siblings, 0 replies; 83+ messages in thread
From: Tomasz Figa @ 2014-07-02 18:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
Hi Kukjin,
On 30.06.2014 23:32, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> This series removes S5P64X0 and S5PC100 related codes in mainline,
> because no more user now. And if its supporting is required later,
> it will be done with using device tree.
>
> [PATCH 01/17] ARM: S5P64X0: no more support S5P6440 and S5P6450 SoCs
> [PATCH 02/17] gpio: samsung: remove s5p64x0 related gpio codes
> [PATCH 03/17] spi: s3c64xx: remove s5p64x0 related spi codes
> [PATCH 04/17] ASoC: samsung: no more support for S5P6440 and S5P6450
> [PATCH 05/17] pwm: samsung: remove s5p64x0 related pwm codes
> [PATCH 06/17] video: fbdev: s3c-fb: remove s5p64x0 related fimd
> [PATCH 07/17] serial: samsung: no more support for S5P6440 and
> [PATCH 08/17] ARM: S5PC100: no more support S5PC100 SoC
> [PATCH 09/17] gpio: samsung: remov s5pc100 related gpio codes
> [PATCH 10/17] spi: s3c64xx: remove s5pc100 related spi codes
> [PATCH 11/17] pwm: samsung: remove s5pc100 related pwm codes
> [PATCH 12/17] serial: samsung: no more support for S5PC100 SoC
> [PATCH 13/17] ata: pata_samsung_cf: removes s5pc100 related ata
> [PATCH 14/17] mtd: onenand: remove s5pc100 related onenand codes
> [PATCH 15/17] video: fbdev: s3c-fb: remove s5pc100 related fimd and
> [PATCH 16/17] [media] exynos4-is: removes s5pc100 related fimc codes
> [PATCH 17/17] ASoC: Samsung: remove s5pc100 related codes
Thanks for this series.
Just letting you know that I have rebased my s5pv210 DT migration series
on top of this and will be sending the patches after some more testing.
Best regards,
Tomasz
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 83+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 00/17] ARM: S5P64X0, S5PC100: no more support in mainline
2014-07-02 18:02 ` Tomasz Figa
@ 2014-07-02 22:46 ` Kukjin Kim
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 83+ messages in thread
From: Kukjin Kim @ 2014-07-02 22:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tomasz Figa; +Cc: Kukjin Kim, linux-arm-kernel, linux-samsung-soc
On 07/03/14 03:02, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> Hi Kukjin,
>
Hi,
> On 30.06.2014 23:32, Kukjin Kim wrote:
>> This series removes S5P64X0 and S5PC100 related codes in mainline,
>> because no more user now. And if its supporting is required later,
>> it will be done with using device tree.
>>
>> [PATCH 01/17] ARM: S5P64X0: no more support S5P6440 and S5P6450 SoCs
>> [PATCH 02/17] gpio: samsung: remove s5p64x0 related gpio codes
>> [PATCH 03/17] spi: s3c64xx: remove s5p64x0 related spi codes
>> [PATCH 04/17] ASoC: samsung: no more support for S5P6440 and S5P6450
>> [PATCH 05/17] pwm: samsung: remove s5p64x0 related pwm codes
>> [PATCH 06/17] video: fbdev: s3c-fb: remove s5p64x0 related fimd
>> [PATCH 07/17] serial: samsung: no more support for S5P6440 and
>> [PATCH 08/17] ARM: S5PC100: no more support S5PC100 SoC
>> [PATCH 09/17] gpio: samsung: remov s5pc100 related gpio codes
>> [PATCH 10/17] spi: s3c64xx: remove s5pc100 related spi codes
>> [PATCH 11/17] pwm: samsung: remove s5pc100 related pwm codes
>> [PATCH 12/17] serial: samsung: no more support for S5PC100 SoC
>> [PATCH 13/17] ata: pata_samsung_cf: removes s5pc100 related ata
>> [PATCH 14/17] mtd: onenand: remove s5pc100 related onenand codes
>> [PATCH 15/17] video: fbdev: s3c-fb: remove s5pc100 related fimd and
>> [PATCH 16/17] [media] exynos4-is: removes s5pc100 related fimc codes
>> [PATCH 17/17] ASoC: Samsung: remove s5pc100 related codes
>
> Thanks for this series.
>
> Just letting you know that I have rebased my s5pv210 DT migration series
> on top of this and will be sending the patches after some more testing.
>
Just note since I've missed one more change in the series, I amended it
just now but it should be fine with your series I think.
Please see v3.17-next/cleanup-s5p branch.
Thanks for your support for s5pv210 dt migration.
- Kukjin
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 83+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 00/17] ARM: S5P64X0, S5PC100: no more support in mainline
@ 2014-07-02 22:46 ` Kukjin Kim
0 siblings, 0 replies; 83+ messages in thread
From: Kukjin Kim @ 2014-07-02 22:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On 07/03/14 03:02, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> Hi Kukjin,
>
Hi,
> On 30.06.2014 23:32, Kukjin Kim wrote:
>> This series removes S5P64X0 and S5PC100 related codes in mainline,
>> because no more user now. And if its supporting is required later,
>> it will be done with using device tree.
>>
>> [PATCH 01/17] ARM: S5P64X0: no more support S5P6440 and S5P6450 SoCs
>> [PATCH 02/17] gpio: samsung: remove s5p64x0 related gpio codes
>> [PATCH 03/17] spi: s3c64xx: remove s5p64x0 related spi codes
>> [PATCH 04/17] ASoC: samsung: no more support for S5P6440 and S5P6450
>> [PATCH 05/17] pwm: samsung: remove s5p64x0 related pwm codes
>> [PATCH 06/17] video: fbdev: s3c-fb: remove s5p64x0 related fimd
>> [PATCH 07/17] serial: samsung: no more support for S5P6440 and
>> [PATCH 08/17] ARM: S5PC100: no more support S5PC100 SoC
>> [PATCH 09/17] gpio: samsung: remov s5pc100 related gpio codes
>> [PATCH 10/17] spi: s3c64xx: remove s5pc100 related spi codes
>> [PATCH 11/17] pwm: samsung: remove s5pc100 related pwm codes
>> [PATCH 12/17] serial: samsung: no more support for S5PC100 SoC
>> [PATCH 13/17] ata: pata_samsung_cf: removes s5pc100 related ata
>> [PATCH 14/17] mtd: onenand: remove s5pc100 related onenand codes
>> [PATCH 15/17] video: fbdev: s3c-fb: remove s5pc100 related fimd and
>> [PATCH 16/17] [media] exynos4-is: removes s5pc100 related fimc codes
>> [PATCH 17/17] ASoC: Samsung: remove s5pc100 related codes
>
> Thanks for this series.
>
> Just letting you know that I have rebased my s5pv210 DT migration series
> on top of this and will be sending the patches after some more testing.
>
Just note since I've missed one more change in the series, I amended it
just now but it should be fine with your series I think.
Please see v3.17-next/cleanup-s5p branch.
Thanks for your support for s5pv210 dt migration.
- Kukjin
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 83+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 00/17] ARM: S5P64X0, S5PC100: no more support in mainline
2014-07-02 22:46 ` Kukjin Kim
@ 2014-07-03 3:35 ` Sachin Kamat
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 83+ messages in thread
From: Sachin Kamat @ 2014-07-03 3:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kukjin Kim; +Cc: Tomasz Figa, linux-arm-kernel, linux-samsung-soc
Hi Kukjin,
On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 4:16 AM, Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com> wrote:
> On 07/03/14 03:02, Tomasz Figa wrote:
>>
>> Hi Kukjin,
>>
> Hi,
>
>
>> On 30.06.2014 23:32, Kukjin Kim wrote:
>>>
>>> This series removes S5P64X0 and S5PC100 related codes in mainline,
>>> because no more user now. And if its supporting is required later,
>>> it will be done with using device tree.
>>>
>>> [PATCH 01/17] ARM: S5P64X0: no more support S5P6440 and S5P6450 SoCs
>>> [PATCH 02/17] gpio: samsung: remove s5p64x0 related gpio codes
>>> [PATCH 03/17] spi: s3c64xx: remove s5p64x0 related spi codes
>>> [PATCH 04/17] ASoC: samsung: no more support for S5P6440 and S5P6450
>>> [PATCH 05/17] pwm: samsung: remove s5p64x0 related pwm codes
>>> [PATCH 06/17] video: fbdev: s3c-fb: remove s5p64x0 related fimd
>>> [PATCH 07/17] serial: samsung: no more support for S5P6440 and
>>> [PATCH 08/17] ARM: S5PC100: no more support S5PC100 SoC
>>> [PATCH 09/17] gpio: samsung: remov s5pc100 related gpio codes
>>> [PATCH 10/17] spi: s3c64xx: remove s5pc100 related spi codes
>>> [PATCH 11/17] pwm: samsung: remove s5pc100 related pwm codes
>>> [PATCH 12/17] serial: samsung: no more support for S5PC100 SoC
>>> [PATCH 13/17] ata: pata_samsung_cf: removes s5pc100 related ata
>>> [PATCH 14/17] mtd: onenand: remove s5pc100 related onenand codes
>>> [PATCH 15/17] video: fbdev: s3c-fb: remove s5pc100 related fimd and
>>> [PATCH 16/17] [media] exynos4-is: removes s5pc100 related fimc codes
>>> [PATCH 17/17] ASoC: Samsung: remove s5pc100 related codes
>>
>>
>> Thanks for this series.
>>
>> Just letting you know that I have rebased my s5pv210 DT migration series
>> on top of this and will be sending the patches after some more testing.
>>
> Just note since I've missed one more change in the series, I amended it just
> now but it should be fine with your series I think.
>
> Please see v3.17-next/cleanup-s5p branch.
Can you please push out the other patches that you applied last week?
Thanks.
--
Regards,
Sachin.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 83+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 00/17] ARM: S5P64X0, S5PC100: no more support in mainline
@ 2014-07-03 3:35 ` Sachin Kamat
0 siblings, 0 replies; 83+ messages in thread
From: Sachin Kamat @ 2014-07-03 3:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
Hi Kukjin,
On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 4:16 AM, Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com> wrote:
> On 07/03/14 03:02, Tomasz Figa wrote:
>>
>> Hi Kukjin,
>>
> Hi,
>
>
>> On 30.06.2014 23:32, Kukjin Kim wrote:
>>>
>>> This series removes S5P64X0 and S5PC100 related codes in mainline,
>>> because no more user now. And if its supporting is required later,
>>> it will be done with using device tree.
>>>
>>> [PATCH 01/17] ARM: S5P64X0: no more support S5P6440 and S5P6450 SoCs
>>> [PATCH 02/17] gpio: samsung: remove s5p64x0 related gpio codes
>>> [PATCH 03/17] spi: s3c64xx: remove s5p64x0 related spi codes
>>> [PATCH 04/17] ASoC: samsung: no more support for S5P6440 and S5P6450
>>> [PATCH 05/17] pwm: samsung: remove s5p64x0 related pwm codes
>>> [PATCH 06/17] video: fbdev: s3c-fb: remove s5p64x0 related fimd
>>> [PATCH 07/17] serial: samsung: no more support for S5P6440 and
>>> [PATCH 08/17] ARM: S5PC100: no more support S5PC100 SoC
>>> [PATCH 09/17] gpio: samsung: remov s5pc100 related gpio codes
>>> [PATCH 10/17] spi: s3c64xx: remove s5pc100 related spi codes
>>> [PATCH 11/17] pwm: samsung: remove s5pc100 related pwm codes
>>> [PATCH 12/17] serial: samsung: no more support for S5PC100 SoC
>>> [PATCH 13/17] ata: pata_samsung_cf: removes s5pc100 related ata
>>> [PATCH 14/17] mtd: onenand: remove s5pc100 related onenand codes
>>> [PATCH 15/17] video: fbdev: s3c-fb: remove s5pc100 related fimd and
>>> [PATCH 16/17] [media] exynos4-is: removes s5pc100 related fimc codes
>>> [PATCH 17/17] ASoC: Samsung: remove s5pc100 related codes
>>
>>
>> Thanks for this series.
>>
>> Just letting you know that I have rebased my s5pv210 DT migration series
>> on top of this and will be sending the patches after some more testing.
>>
> Just note since I've missed one more change in the series, I amended it just
> now but it should be fine with your series I think.
>
> Please see v3.17-next/cleanup-s5p branch.
Can you please push out the other patches that you applied last week?
Thanks.
--
Regards,
Sachin.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 83+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 11/17] pwm: samsung: remove s5pc100 related pwm codes
2014-06-30 21:32 ` Kukjin Kim
@ 2014-07-03 12:44 ` Tomasz Figa
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 83+ messages in thread
From: Tomasz Figa @ 2014-07-03 12:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kukjin Kim, linux-arm-kernel, linux-samsung-soc; +Cc: Thierry Reding
Hi Kukjin,
On 30.06.2014 23:32, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> This patch removes supporting s5pc100 related pwm codes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
> Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-samsung.txt | 2 --
> drivers/clocksource/samsung_pwm_timer.c | 12 ------------
> drivers/pwm/pwm-samsung.c | 8 --------
> 3 files changed, 22 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-samsung.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-samsung.txt
> index 43925d3..82c7f6b 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-samsung.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-samsung.txt
> @@ -11,8 +11,6 @@ Required properties:
> - compatible : should be one of following:
> samsung,s3c2410-pwm - for 16-bit timers present on S3C24xx SoCs
> samsung,s3c6400-pwm - for 32-bit timers present on S3C64xx SoCs
> - samsung,s5pc100-pwm - for 32-bit timers present on S5PC100, S5PV210,
> - Exynos4210 rev0 SoCs
As you can see here, this variant is used for more than S5PC100. It is
needed for S5PV210 and Exynos4210 rev0 SoCs as well. So this patch
should be dropped.
Best regards,
Tomasz
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 83+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 11/17] pwm: samsung: remove s5pc100 related pwm codes
@ 2014-07-03 12:44 ` Tomasz Figa
0 siblings, 0 replies; 83+ messages in thread
From: Tomasz Figa @ 2014-07-03 12:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
Hi Kukjin,
On 30.06.2014 23:32, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> This patch removes supporting s5pc100 related pwm codes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
> Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-samsung.txt | 2 --
> drivers/clocksource/samsung_pwm_timer.c | 12 ------------
> drivers/pwm/pwm-samsung.c | 8 --------
> 3 files changed, 22 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-samsung.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-samsung.txt
> index 43925d3..82c7f6b 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-samsung.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-samsung.txt
> @@ -11,8 +11,6 @@ Required properties:
> - compatible : should be one of following:
> samsung,s3c2410-pwm - for 16-bit timers present on S3C24xx SoCs
> samsung,s3c6400-pwm - for 32-bit timers present on S3C64xx SoCs
> - samsung,s5pc100-pwm - for 32-bit timers present on S5PC100, S5PV210,
> - Exynos4210 rev0 SoCs
As you can see here, this variant is used for more than S5PC100. It is
needed for S5PV210 and Exynos4210 rev0 SoCs as well. So this patch
should be dropped.
Best regards,
Tomasz
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 83+ messages in thread
* RE: [PATCH 11/17] pwm: samsung: remove s5pc100 related pwm codes
2014-07-03 12:44 ` Tomasz Figa
@ 2014-07-04 7:32 ` Kukjin Kim
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 83+ messages in thread
From: Kukjin Kim @ 2014-07-04 7:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 'Tomasz Figa', linux-arm-kernel, linux-samsung-soc
Cc: 'Thierry Reding'
Tomasz Figa wrote:
>
> Hi Kukjin,
>
Hi,
> On 30.06.2014 23:32, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> > This patch removes supporting s5pc100 related pwm codes.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
> > Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
> > ---
> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-samsung.txt | 2 --
> > drivers/clocksource/samsung_pwm_timer.c | 12 ------------
> > drivers/pwm/pwm-samsung.c | 8 --------
> > 3 files changed, 22 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-samsung.txt
> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-samsung.txt
> > index 43925d3..82c7f6b 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-samsung.txt
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-samsung.txt
> > @@ -11,8 +11,6 @@ Required properties:
> > - compatible : should be one of following:
> > samsung,s3c2410-pwm - for 16-bit timers present on S3C24xx SoCs
> > samsung,s3c6400-pwm - for 32-bit timers present on S3C64xx SoCs
> > - samsung,s5pc100-pwm - for 32-bit timers present on S5PC100, S5PV210,
> > - Exynos4210 rev0 SoCs
>
> As you can see here, this variant is used for more than S5PC100. It is
> needed for S5PV210 and Exynos4210 rev0 SoCs as well. So this patch
> should be dropped.
Oh, I just now checked its datasheets and s5pv210 and early exynos4210 are
using BIT(5) for tclk_mask. You're right. But I couldn't its usage in mainline
when I created the patch. Anyway it can be used for s5pv210 so how about
following?
pwm: samsung: change s5pc100-pwm to s5pv210-pwm for support s5pv210 SoC
Reported-by: Tomasz Figa <t.figa@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
---
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-samsung.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-samsung.txt
index 43925d3..ce005c0 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-samsung.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-samsung.txt
@@ -11,8 +11,8 @@ Required properties:
- compatible : should be one of following:
samsung,s3c2410-pwm - for 16-bit timers present on S3C24xx SoCs
samsung,s3c6400-pwm - for 32-bit timers present on S3C64xx SoCs
- samsung,s5pc100-pwm - for 32-bit timers present on S5PC100, S5PV210,
- Exynos4210 rev0 SoCs
+ samsung,s5pv210-pwm - for 32-bit timers present on S5PV210 and
+ Exynos4210 rev0 SoCs
samsung,exynos4210-pwm - for 32-bit timers present on Exynos4210,
Exynos4x12, Exynos5250 and Exynos5420 SoCs
- reg: base address and size of register area
diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/samsung_pwm_timer.c b/drivers/clocksource/samsung_pwm_timer.c
index e35a9b7..f0a5918 100644
--- a/drivers/clocksource/samsung_pwm_timer.c
+++ b/drivers/clocksource/samsung_pwm_timer.c
@@ -480,16 +480,16 @@ static void __init s3c64xx_pwm_clocksource_init(struct device_node *np)
}
CLOCKSOURCE_OF_DECLARE(s3c6400_pwm, "samsung,s3c6400-pwm", s3c64xx_pwm_clocksource_init);
-static const struct samsung_pwm_variant s5p_variant = {
+static const struct samsung_pwm_variant s5pv210_variant = {
.bits = 32,
.div_base = 0,
.has_tint_cstat = true,
.tclk_mask = (1 << 5),
};
-static void __init s5p_pwm_clocksource_init(struct device_node *np)
+static void __init s5pv210_pwm_clocksource_init(struct device_node *np)
{
- samsung_pwm_alloc(np, &s5p_variant);
+ samsung_pwm_alloc(np, &s5pv210_variant);
}
-CLOCKSOURCE_OF_DECLARE(s5pc100_pwm, "samsung,s5pc100-pwm", s5p_pwm_clocksource_init);
+CLOCKSOURCE_OF_DECLARE(s5pv210_pwm, "samsung,s5pv210-pwm", s5pv210_pwm_clocksource_init);
#endif
diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-samsung.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-samsung.c
index 68f3471..a2bafc9 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-samsung.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-samsung.c
@@ -404,24 +404,24 @@ static const struct samsung_pwm_variant s3c64xx_variant = {
.tclk_mask = BIT(7) | BIT(6) | BIT(5),
};
-static const struct samsung_pwm_variant exynos4210_variant = {
+static const struct samsung_pwm_variant s5pv210_variant = {
.bits = 32,
.div_base = 0,
.has_tint_cstat = true,
- .tclk_mask = 0,
+ .tclk_mask = BIT(5),
};
-static const struct samsung_pwm_variant s5pc100_variant = {
+static const struct samsung_pwm_variant exynos4210_variant = {
.bits = 32,
.div_base = 0,
.has_tint_cstat = true,
- .tclk_mask = BIT(5),
+ .tclk_mask = 0,
};
static const struct of_device_id samsung_pwm_matches[] = {
{ .compatible = "samsung,s3c2410-pwm", .data = &s3c24xx_variant },
{ .compatible = "samsung,s3c6400-pwm", .data = &s3c64xx_variant },
- { .compatible = "samsung,s5pc100-pwm", .data = &s5pc100_variant },
+ { .compatible = "samsung,s5pv210-pwm", .data = &s5pv210_variant },
{ .compatible = "samsung,exynos4210-pwm", .data = &exynos4210_variant },
{},
};
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 83+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 11/17] pwm: samsung: remove s5pc100 related pwm codes
@ 2014-07-04 7:32 ` Kukjin Kim
0 siblings, 0 replies; 83+ messages in thread
From: Kukjin Kim @ 2014-07-04 7:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
Tomasz Figa wrote:
>
> Hi Kukjin,
>
Hi,
> On 30.06.2014 23:32, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> > This patch removes supporting s5pc100 related pwm codes.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
> > Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
> > ---
> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-samsung.txt | 2 --
> > drivers/clocksource/samsung_pwm_timer.c | 12 ------------
> > drivers/pwm/pwm-samsung.c | 8 --------
> > 3 files changed, 22 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-samsung.txt
> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-samsung.txt
> > index 43925d3..82c7f6b 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-samsung.txt
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-samsung.txt
> > @@ -11,8 +11,6 @@ Required properties:
> > - compatible : should be one of following:
> > samsung,s3c2410-pwm - for 16-bit timers present on S3C24xx SoCs
> > samsung,s3c6400-pwm - for 32-bit timers present on S3C64xx SoCs
> > - samsung,s5pc100-pwm - for 32-bit timers present on S5PC100, S5PV210,
> > - Exynos4210 rev0 SoCs
>
> As you can see here, this variant is used for more than S5PC100. It is
> needed for S5PV210 and Exynos4210 rev0 SoCs as well. So this patch
> should be dropped.
Oh, I just now checked its datasheets and s5pv210 and early exynos4210 are
using BIT(5) for tclk_mask. You're right. But I couldn't its usage in mainline
when I created the patch. Anyway it can be used for s5pv210 so how about
following?
pwm: samsung: change s5pc100-pwm to s5pv210-pwm for support s5pv210 SoC
Reported-by: Tomasz Figa <t.figa@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
---
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-samsung.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-samsung.txt
index 43925d3..ce005c0 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-samsung.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-samsung.txt
@@ -11,8 +11,8 @@ Required properties:
- compatible : should be one of following:
samsung,s3c2410-pwm - for 16-bit timers present on S3C24xx SoCs
samsung,s3c6400-pwm - for 32-bit timers present on S3C64xx SoCs
- samsung,s5pc100-pwm - for 32-bit timers present on S5PC100, S5PV210,
- Exynos4210 rev0 SoCs
+ samsung,s5pv210-pwm - for 32-bit timers present on S5PV210 and
+ Exynos4210 rev0 SoCs
samsung,exynos4210-pwm - for 32-bit timers present on Exynos4210,
Exynos4x12, Exynos5250 and Exynos5420 SoCs
- reg: base address and size of register area
diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/samsung_pwm_timer.c b/drivers/clocksource/samsung_pwm_timer.c
index e35a9b7..f0a5918 100644
--- a/drivers/clocksource/samsung_pwm_timer.c
+++ b/drivers/clocksource/samsung_pwm_timer.c
@@ -480,16 +480,16 @@ static void __init s3c64xx_pwm_clocksource_init(struct device_node *np)
}
CLOCKSOURCE_OF_DECLARE(s3c6400_pwm, "samsung,s3c6400-pwm", s3c64xx_pwm_clocksource_init);
-static const struct samsung_pwm_variant s5p_variant = {
+static const struct samsung_pwm_variant s5pv210_variant = {
.bits = 32,
.div_base = 0,
.has_tint_cstat = true,
.tclk_mask = (1 << 5),
};
-static void __init s5p_pwm_clocksource_init(struct device_node *np)
+static void __init s5pv210_pwm_clocksource_init(struct device_node *np)
{
- samsung_pwm_alloc(np, &s5p_variant);
+ samsung_pwm_alloc(np, &s5pv210_variant);
}
-CLOCKSOURCE_OF_DECLARE(s5pc100_pwm, "samsung,s5pc100-pwm", s5p_pwm_clocksource_init);
+CLOCKSOURCE_OF_DECLARE(s5pv210_pwm, "samsung,s5pv210-pwm", s5pv210_pwm_clocksource_init);
#endif
diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-samsung.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-samsung.c
index 68f3471..a2bafc9 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-samsung.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-samsung.c
@@ -404,24 +404,24 @@ static const struct samsung_pwm_variant s3c64xx_variant = {
.tclk_mask = BIT(7) | BIT(6) | BIT(5),
};
-static const struct samsung_pwm_variant exynos4210_variant = {
+static const struct samsung_pwm_variant s5pv210_variant = {
.bits = 32,
.div_base = 0,
.has_tint_cstat = true,
- .tclk_mask = 0,
+ .tclk_mask = BIT(5),
};
-static const struct samsung_pwm_variant s5pc100_variant = {
+static const struct samsung_pwm_variant exynos4210_variant = {
.bits = 32,
.div_base = 0,
.has_tint_cstat = true,
- .tclk_mask = BIT(5),
+ .tclk_mask = 0,
};
static const struct of_device_id samsung_pwm_matches[] = {
{ .compatible = "samsung,s3c2410-pwm", .data = &s3c24xx_variant },
{ .compatible = "samsung,s3c6400-pwm", .data = &s3c64xx_variant },
- { .compatible = "samsung,s5pc100-pwm", .data = &s5pc100_variant },
+ { .compatible = "samsung,s5pv210-pwm", .data = &s5pv210_variant },
{ .compatible = "samsung,exynos4210-pwm", .data = &exynos4210_variant },
{},
};
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 83+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 11/17] pwm: samsung: remove s5pc100 related pwm codes
2014-07-04 7:32 ` Kukjin Kim
@ 2014-07-04 8:07 ` Tomasz Figa
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 83+ messages in thread
From: Tomasz Figa @ 2014-07-04 8:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kukjin Kim, 'Tomasz Figa', linux-arm-kernel, linux-samsung-soc
Cc: 'Thierry Reding'
On 04.07.2014 09:32, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> Tomasz Figa wrote:
>>
>> Hi Kukjin,
>>
> Hi,
>
>> On 30.06.2014 23:32, Kukjin Kim wrote:
>>> This patch removes supporting s5pc100 related pwm codes.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
>>> Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
>>> ---
>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-samsung.txt | 2 --
>>> drivers/clocksource/samsung_pwm_timer.c | 12 ------------
>>> drivers/pwm/pwm-samsung.c | 8 --------
>>> 3 files changed, 22 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-samsung.txt
>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-samsung.txt
>>> index 43925d3..82c7f6b 100644
>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-samsung.txt
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-samsung.txt
>>> @@ -11,8 +11,6 @@ Required properties:
>>> - compatible : should be one of following:
>>> samsung,s3c2410-pwm - for 16-bit timers present on S3C24xx SoCs
>>> samsung,s3c6400-pwm - for 32-bit timers present on S3C64xx SoCs
>>> - samsung,s5pc100-pwm - for 32-bit timers present on S5PC100, S5PV210,
>>> - Exynos4210 rev0 SoCs
>>
>> As you can see here, this variant is used for more than S5PC100. It is
>> needed for S5PV210 and Exynos4210 rev0 SoCs as well. So this patch
>> should be dropped.
>
> Oh, I just now checked its datasheets and s5pv210 and early exynos4210 are
> using BIT(5) for tclk_mask. You're right. But I couldn't its usage in mainline
> when I created the patch. Anyway it can be used for s5pv210 so how about
> following?
Hmm, sorry for the confusion, but actually this seems to be a mistake in
the binding documentation. On Exynos4210 rev0, "samsung,s5p6440-pwm" is
supposed to be used and "samsung,s5pc100" supports both S5PC100 and S5PV210.
However I'm not sure why you want to change existing DT bindings. The
rule is to name the compatible string after first existing SoC for which
it can be used, so removing support for this SoC doesn't imply removing
this compatible string because it can be used for future SoCs as well,
if they turn out to be compatible.
My suggestion is to keep this as it was.
Best regards,
Tomasz
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 83+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 11/17] pwm: samsung: remove s5pc100 related pwm codes
@ 2014-07-04 8:07 ` Tomasz Figa
0 siblings, 0 replies; 83+ messages in thread
From: Tomasz Figa @ 2014-07-04 8:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On 04.07.2014 09:32, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> Tomasz Figa wrote:
>>
>> Hi Kukjin,
>>
> Hi,
>
>> On 30.06.2014 23:32, Kukjin Kim wrote:
>>> This patch removes supporting s5pc100 related pwm codes.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
>>> Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
>>> ---
>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-samsung.txt | 2 --
>>> drivers/clocksource/samsung_pwm_timer.c | 12 ------------
>>> drivers/pwm/pwm-samsung.c | 8 --------
>>> 3 files changed, 22 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-samsung.txt
>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-samsung.txt
>>> index 43925d3..82c7f6b 100644
>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-samsung.txt
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-samsung.txt
>>> @@ -11,8 +11,6 @@ Required properties:
>>> - compatible : should be one of following:
>>> samsung,s3c2410-pwm - for 16-bit timers present on S3C24xx SoCs
>>> samsung,s3c6400-pwm - for 32-bit timers present on S3C64xx SoCs
>>> - samsung,s5pc100-pwm - for 32-bit timers present on S5PC100, S5PV210,
>>> - Exynos4210 rev0 SoCs
>>
>> As you can see here, this variant is used for more than S5PC100. It is
>> needed for S5PV210 and Exynos4210 rev0 SoCs as well. So this patch
>> should be dropped.
>
> Oh, I just now checked its datasheets and s5pv210 and early exynos4210 are
> using BIT(5) for tclk_mask. You're right. But I couldn't its usage in mainline
> when I created the patch. Anyway it can be used for s5pv210 so how about
> following?
Hmm, sorry for the confusion, but actually this seems to be a mistake in
the binding documentation. On Exynos4210 rev0, "samsung,s5p6440-pwm" is
supposed to be used and "samsung,s5pc100" supports both S5PC100 and S5PV210.
However I'm not sure why you want to change existing DT bindings. The
rule is to name the compatible string after first existing SoC for which
it can be used, so removing support for this SoC doesn't imply removing
this compatible string because it can be used for future SoCs as well,
if they turn out to be compatible.
My suggestion is to keep this as it was.
Best regards,
Tomasz
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 83+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 05/17] pwm: samsung: remove s5p64x0 related pwm codes
2014-06-30 21:32 ` Kukjin Kim
@ 2014-07-04 8:10 ` Tomasz Figa
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 83+ messages in thread
From: Tomasz Figa @ 2014-07-04 8:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kukjin Kim, linux-arm-kernel, linux-samsung-soc; +Cc: Thierry Reding
Hi Kukjin,
On 30.06.2014 23:32, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> This patch removes supporting s5p64x0 related pwm codes because of
> no more support for S5P6440 and S5P6450 SoCs. And this patch changes
> the name of s5p6440-pwm to exynos-pwm instead.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
> Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-samsung.txt | 1 -
> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210-universal_c210.dts | 2 +-
> drivers/clocksource/samsung_pwm_timer.c | 13 -------------
> drivers/pwm/pwm-samsung.c | 5 ++---
> 4 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-samsung.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-samsung.txt
> index 5538de9..43925d3 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-samsung.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-samsung.txt
> @@ -11,7 +11,6 @@ Required properties:
> - compatible : should be one of following:
> samsung,s3c2410-pwm - for 16-bit timers present on S3C24xx SoCs
> samsung,s3c6400-pwm - for 32-bit timers present on S3C64xx SoCs
> - samsung,s5p6440-pwm - for 32-bit timers present on S5P64x0 SoCs
> samsung,s5pc100-pwm - for 32-bit timers present on S5PC100, S5PV210,
> Exynos4210 rev0 SoCs
> samsung,exynos4210-pwm - for 32-bit timers present on Exynos4210,
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210-universal_c210.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210-universal_c210.dts
> index d50eb3a..0ca26e0 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210-universal_c210.dts
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210-universal_c210.dts
> @@ -461,7 +461,7 @@
> };
>
> pwm@139D0000 {
> - compatible = "samsung,s5p6440-pwm";
> + compatible = "samsung,exynos4210-pwm";
There is a reason to use a different compatible string for Exynos4210
rev0. The PWM block is used as a timer there, while on newer revs MCT is
used. Sorry, but I have to NAK this patch.
As I explained in my reply to patch 11/17, I'd suggest keeping the PWM
drivers as is, because there is no need to remove support for DT
compatible strings.
Best regards,
Tomasz
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 83+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 05/17] pwm: samsung: remove s5p64x0 related pwm codes
@ 2014-07-04 8:10 ` Tomasz Figa
0 siblings, 0 replies; 83+ messages in thread
From: Tomasz Figa @ 2014-07-04 8:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
Hi Kukjin,
On 30.06.2014 23:32, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> This patch removes supporting s5p64x0 related pwm codes because of
> no more support for S5P6440 and S5P6450 SoCs. And this patch changes
> the name of s5p6440-pwm to exynos-pwm instead.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
> Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-samsung.txt | 1 -
> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210-universal_c210.dts | 2 +-
> drivers/clocksource/samsung_pwm_timer.c | 13 -------------
> drivers/pwm/pwm-samsung.c | 5 ++---
> 4 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-samsung.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-samsung.txt
> index 5538de9..43925d3 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-samsung.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-samsung.txt
> @@ -11,7 +11,6 @@ Required properties:
> - compatible : should be one of following:
> samsung,s3c2410-pwm - for 16-bit timers present on S3C24xx SoCs
> samsung,s3c6400-pwm - for 32-bit timers present on S3C64xx SoCs
> - samsung,s5p6440-pwm - for 32-bit timers present on S5P64x0 SoCs
> samsung,s5pc100-pwm - for 32-bit timers present on S5PC100, S5PV210,
> Exynos4210 rev0 SoCs
> samsung,exynos4210-pwm - for 32-bit timers present on Exynos4210,
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210-universal_c210.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210-universal_c210.dts
> index d50eb3a..0ca26e0 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210-universal_c210.dts
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210-universal_c210.dts
> @@ -461,7 +461,7 @@
> };
>
> pwm at 139D0000 {
> - compatible = "samsung,s5p6440-pwm";
> + compatible = "samsung,exynos4210-pwm";
There is a reason to use a different compatible string for Exynos4210
rev0. The PWM block is used as a timer there, while on newer revs MCT is
used. Sorry, but I have to NAK this patch.
As I explained in my reply to patch 11/17, I'd suggest keeping the PWM
drivers as is, because there is no need to remove support for DT
compatible strings.
Best regards,
Tomasz
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 83+ messages in thread
* RE: [PATCH 00/17] ARM: S5P64X0, S5PC100: no more support in mainline
2014-07-03 3:35 ` Sachin Kamat
@ 2014-07-04 8:43 ` Kukjin Kim
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 83+ messages in thread
From: Kukjin Kim @ 2014-07-04 8:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 'Sachin Kamat'
Cc: 'Tomasz Figa', linux-arm-kernel, 'linux-samsung-soc'
Sachin Kamat wrote:
>
> Hi Kukjin,
>
Hi,
> On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 4:16 AM, Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com> wrote:
> > On 07/03/14 03:02, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Kukjin,
> >>
> > Hi,
> >
> >
> >> On 30.06.2014 23:32, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> >>>
> >>> This series removes S5P64X0 and S5PC100 related codes in mainline,
> >>> because no more user now. And if its supporting is required later,
> >>> it will be done with using device tree.
> >>>
> >>> [PATCH 01/17] ARM: S5P64X0: no more support S5P6440 and S5P6450 SoCs
> >>> [PATCH 02/17] gpio: samsung: remove s5p64x0 related gpio codes
> >>> [PATCH 03/17] spi: s3c64xx: remove s5p64x0 related spi codes
> >>> [PATCH 04/17] ASoC: samsung: no more support for S5P6440 and S5P6450
> >>> [PATCH 05/17] pwm: samsung: remove s5p64x0 related pwm codes
> >>> [PATCH 06/17] video: fbdev: s3c-fb: remove s5p64x0 related fimd
> >>> [PATCH 07/17] serial: samsung: no more support for S5P6440 and
> >>> [PATCH 08/17] ARM: S5PC100: no more support S5PC100 SoC
> >>> [PATCH 09/17] gpio: samsung: remov s5pc100 related gpio codes
> >>> [PATCH 10/17] spi: s3c64xx: remove s5pc100 related spi codes
> >>> [PATCH 11/17] pwm: samsung: remove s5pc100 related pwm codes
> >>> [PATCH 12/17] serial: samsung: no more support for S5PC100 SoC
> >>> [PATCH 13/17] ata: pata_samsung_cf: removes s5pc100 related ata
> >>> [PATCH 14/17] mtd: onenand: remove s5pc100 related onenand codes
> >>> [PATCH 15/17] video: fbdev: s3c-fb: remove s5pc100 related fimd and
> >>> [PATCH 16/17] [media] exynos4-is: removes s5pc100 related fimc codes
> >>> [PATCH 17/17] ASoC: Samsung: remove s5pc100 related codes
> >>
> >>
> >> Thanks for this series.
> >>
> >> Just letting you know that I have rebased my s5pv210 DT migration series
> >> on top of this and will be sending the patches after some more testing.
> >>
> > Just note since I've missed one more change in the series, I amended it just
> > now but it should be fine with your series I think.
> >
> > Please see v3.17-next/cleanup-s5p branch.
>
> Can you please push out the other patches that you applied last week?
>
You mean whole patches in this series? OK, I will in this weekend.
Note, as you know, missing patches in my tree are handled by other maintainer.
Thanks,
Kukjin
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 83+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 00/17] ARM: S5P64X0, S5PC100: no more support in mainline
@ 2014-07-04 8:43 ` Kukjin Kim
0 siblings, 0 replies; 83+ messages in thread
From: Kukjin Kim @ 2014-07-04 8:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
Sachin Kamat wrote:
>
> Hi Kukjin,
>
Hi,
> On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 4:16 AM, Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com> wrote:
> > On 07/03/14 03:02, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Kukjin,
> >>
> > Hi,
> >
> >
> >> On 30.06.2014 23:32, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> >>>
> >>> This series removes S5P64X0 and S5PC100 related codes in mainline,
> >>> because no more user now. And if its supporting is required later,
> >>> it will be done with using device tree.
> >>>
> >>> [PATCH 01/17] ARM: S5P64X0: no more support S5P6440 and S5P6450 SoCs
> >>> [PATCH 02/17] gpio: samsung: remove s5p64x0 related gpio codes
> >>> [PATCH 03/17] spi: s3c64xx: remove s5p64x0 related spi codes
> >>> [PATCH 04/17] ASoC: samsung: no more support for S5P6440 and S5P6450
> >>> [PATCH 05/17] pwm: samsung: remove s5p64x0 related pwm codes
> >>> [PATCH 06/17] video: fbdev: s3c-fb: remove s5p64x0 related fimd
> >>> [PATCH 07/17] serial: samsung: no more support for S5P6440 and
> >>> [PATCH 08/17] ARM: S5PC100: no more support S5PC100 SoC
> >>> [PATCH 09/17] gpio: samsung: remov s5pc100 related gpio codes
> >>> [PATCH 10/17] spi: s3c64xx: remove s5pc100 related spi codes
> >>> [PATCH 11/17] pwm: samsung: remove s5pc100 related pwm codes
> >>> [PATCH 12/17] serial: samsung: no more support for S5PC100 SoC
> >>> [PATCH 13/17] ata: pata_samsung_cf: removes s5pc100 related ata
> >>> [PATCH 14/17] mtd: onenand: remove s5pc100 related onenand codes
> >>> [PATCH 15/17] video: fbdev: s3c-fb: remove s5pc100 related fimd and
> >>> [PATCH 16/17] [media] exynos4-is: removes s5pc100 related fimc codes
> >>> [PATCH 17/17] ASoC: Samsung: remove s5pc100 related codes
> >>
> >>
> >> Thanks for this series.
> >>
> >> Just letting you know that I have rebased my s5pv210 DT migration series
> >> on top of this and will be sending the patches after some more testing.
> >>
> > Just note since I've missed one more change in the series, I amended it just
> > now but it should be fine with your series I think.
> >
> > Please see v3.17-next/cleanup-s5p branch.
>
> Can you please push out the other patches that you applied last week?
>
You mean whole patches in this series? OK, I will in this weekend.
Note, as you know, missing patches in my tree are handled by other maintainer.
Thanks,
Kukjin
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 83+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 02/17] gpio: samsung: remove s5p64x0 related gpio codes
2014-06-30 21:32 ` Kukjin Kim
@ 2014-07-07 16:05 ` Linus Walleij
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 83+ messages in thread
From: Linus Walleij @ 2014-07-07 16:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kukjin Kim, Arnd Bergmann; +Cc: linux-arm-kernel, linux-samsung-soc
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 11:32 PM, Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com> wrote:
> This patch removes gpio codes for s5p6440 and s5p6450 SoCs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
> Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Yours,
Linus Walleij
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 83+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 02/17] gpio: samsung: remove s5p64x0 related gpio codes
@ 2014-07-07 16:05 ` Linus Walleij
0 siblings, 0 replies; 83+ messages in thread
From: Linus Walleij @ 2014-07-07 16:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 11:32 PM, Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com> wrote:
> This patch removes gpio codes for s5p6440 and s5p6450 SoCs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
> Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Yours,
Linus Walleij
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 83+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 09/17] gpio: samsung: remov s5pc100 related gpio codes
2014-06-30 21:32 ` Kukjin Kim
@ 2014-07-07 16:05 ` Linus Walleij
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 83+ messages in thread
From: Linus Walleij @ 2014-07-07 16:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kukjin Kim, Arnd Bergmann; +Cc: linux-arm-kernel, linux-samsung-soc
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 11:32 PM, Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com> wrote:
> This patch removes gpio codes for s5pc100 SoC.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
> Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Yours,
Linus Walleij
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 83+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 09/17] gpio: samsung: remov s5pc100 related gpio codes
@ 2014-07-07 16:05 ` Linus Walleij
0 siblings, 0 replies; 83+ messages in thread
From: Linus Walleij @ 2014-07-07 16:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 11:32 PM, Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com> wrote:
> This patch removes gpio codes for s5pc100 SoC.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
> Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Yours,
Linus Walleij
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 83+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 05/17] pwm: samsung: remove s5p64x0 related pwm codes
2014-07-04 8:10 ` Tomasz Figa
@ 2014-07-07 22:23 ` Kukjin Kim
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 83+ messages in thread
From: Kukjin Kim @ 2014-07-07 22:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tomasz Figa
Cc: Kukjin Kim, linux-arm-kernel, linux-samsung-soc, Thierry Reding
On 07/04/14 17:10, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> Hi Kukjin,
>
Tomasz,
> On 30.06.2014 23:32, Kukjin Kim wrote:
>> This patch removes supporting s5p64x0 related pwm codes because of
>> no more support for S5P6440 and S5P6450 SoCs. And this patch changes
>> the name of s5p6440-pwm to exynos-pwm instead.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim<kgene.kim@samsung.com>
>> Cc: Thierry Reding<thierry.reding@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-samsung.txt | 1 -
>> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210-universal_c210.dts | 2 +-
>> drivers/clocksource/samsung_pwm_timer.c | 13 -------------
>> drivers/pwm/pwm-samsung.c | 5 ++---
>> 4 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-samsung.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-samsung.txt
>> index 5538de9..43925d3 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-samsung.txt
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-samsung.txt
>> @@ -11,7 +11,6 @@ Required properties:
>> - compatible : should be one of following:
>> samsung,s3c2410-pwm - for 16-bit timers present on S3C24xx SoCs
>> samsung,s3c6400-pwm - for 32-bit timers present on S3C64xx SoCs
>> - samsung,s5p6440-pwm - for 32-bit timers present on S5P64x0 SoCs
>> samsung,s5pc100-pwm - for 32-bit timers present on S5PC100, S5PV210,
>> Exynos4210 rev0 SoCs
>> samsung,exynos4210-pwm - for 32-bit timers present on Exynos4210,
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210-universal_c210.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210-universal_c210.dts
>> index d50eb3a..0ca26e0 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210-universal_c210.dts
>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210-universal_c210.dts
>> @@ -461,7 +461,7 @@
>> };
>>
>> pwm@139D0000 {
>> - compatible = "samsung,s5p6440-pwm";
>> + compatible = "samsung,exynos4210-pwm";
>
> There is a reason to use a different compatible string for Exynos4210
> rev0. The PWM block is used as a timer there, while on newer revs MCT is
> used. Sorry, but I have to NAK this patch.
>
I remember why exynos4210-universal_c210 uses PWM...OK.
> As I explained in my reply to patch 11/17, I'd suggest keeping the PWM
> drivers as is, because there is no need to remove support for DT
> compatible strings.
>
OK, let me remove pwm related patches in this series but I think need to
update the compatible strings, at least remove non-support SoC in doc?...
Thanks,
Kukjin
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 83+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 05/17] pwm: samsung: remove s5p64x0 related pwm codes
@ 2014-07-07 22:23 ` Kukjin Kim
0 siblings, 0 replies; 83+ messages in thread
From: Kukjin Kim @ 2014-07-07 22:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On 07/04/14 17:10, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> Hi Kukjin,
>
Tomasz,
> On 30.06.2014 23:32, Kukjin Kim wrote:
>> This patch removes supporting s5p64x0 related pwm codes because of
>> no more support for S5P6440 and S5P6450 SoCs. And this patch changes
>> the name of s5p6440-pwm to exynos-pwm instead.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim<kgene.kim@samsung.com>
>> Cc: Thierry Reding<thierry.reding@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-samsung.txt | 1 -
>> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210-universal_c210.dts | 2 +-
>> drivers/clocksource/samsung_pwm_timer.c | 13 -------------
>> drivers/pwm/pwm-samsung.c | 5 ++---
>> 4 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-samsung.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-samsung.txt
>> index 5538de9..43925d3 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-samsung.txt
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-samsung.txt
>> @@ -11,7 +11,6 @@ Required properties:
>> - compatible : should be one of following:
>> samsung,s3c2410-pwm - for 16-bit timers present on S3C24xx SoCs
>> samsung,s3c6400-pwm - for 32-bit timers present on S3C64xx SoCs
>> - samsung,s5p6440-pwm - for 32-bit timers present on S5P64x0 SoCs
>> samsung,s5pc100-pwm - for 32-bit timers present on S5PC100, S5PV210,
>> Exynos4210 rev0 SoCs
>> samsung,exynos4210-pwm - for 32-bit timers present on Exynos4210,
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210-universal_c210.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210-universal_c210.dts
>> index d50eb3a..0ca26e0 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210-universal_c210.dts
>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210-universal_c210.dts
>> @@ -461,7 +461,7 @@
>> };
>>
>> pwm at 139D0000 {
>> - compatible = "samsung,s5p6440-pwm";
>> + compatible = "samsung,exynos4210-pwm";
>
> There is a reason to use a different compatible string for Exynos4210
> rev0. The PWM block is used as a timer there, while on newer revs MCT is
> used. Sorry, but I have to NAK this patch.
>
I remember why exynos4210-universal_c210 uses PWM...OK.
> As I explained in my reply to patch 11/17, I'd suggest keeping the PWM
> drivers as is, because there is no need to remove support for DT
> compatible strings.
>
OK, let me remove pwm related patches in this series but I think need to
update the compatible strings, at least remove non-support SoC in doc?...
Thanks,
Kukjin
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 83+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 05/17] pwm: samsung: remove s5p64x0 related pwm codes
2014-07-07 22:23 ` Kukjin Kim
@ 2014-07-08 15:43 ` Tomasz Figa
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 83+ messages in thread
From: Tomasz Figa @ 2014-07-08 15:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kukjin Kim, Tomasz Figa
Cc: linux-arm-kernel, linux-samsung-soc, Thierry Reding
Kukjin,
On 08.07.2014 00:23, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> On 07/04/14 17:10, Tomasz Figa wrote:
>> Hi Kukjin,
>>
> Tomasz,
>
>> On 30.06.2014 23:32, Kukjin Kim wrote:
>>> This patch removes supporting s5p64x0 related pwm codes because of
>>> no more support for S5P6440 and S5P6450 SoCs. And this patch changes
>>> the name of s5p6440-pwm to exynos-pwm instead.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim<kgene.kim@samsung.com>
>>> Cc: Thierry Reding<thierry.reding@gmail.com>
>>> ---
>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-samsung.txt | 1 -
>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210-universal_c210.dts | 2 +-
>>> drivers/clocksource/samsung_pwm_timer.c | 13 -------------
>>> drivers/pwm/pwm-samsung.c | 5 ++---
>>> 4 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-samsung.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-samsung.txt
>>> index 5538de9..43925d3 100644
>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-samsung.txt
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-samsung.txt
>>> @@ -11,7 +11,6 @@ Required properties:
>>> - compatible : should be one of following:
>>> samsung,s3c2410-pwm - for 16-bit timers present on S3C24xx SoCs
>>> samsung,s3c6400-pwm - for 32-bit timers present on S3C64xx SoCs
>>> - samsung,s5p6440-pwm - for 32-bit timers present on S5P64x0 SoCs
>>> samsung,s5pc100-pwm - for 32-bit timers present on S5PC100, S5PV210,
>>> Exynos4210 rev0 SoCs
>>> samsung,exynos4210-pwm - for 32-bit timers present on Exynos4210,
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210-universal_c210.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210-universal_c210.dts
>>> index d50eb3a..0ca26e0 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210-universal_c210.dts
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210-universal_c210.dts
>>> @@ -461,7 +461,7 @@
>>> };
>>>
>>> pwm@139D0000 {
>>> - compatible = "samsung,s5p6440-pwm";
>>> + compatible = "samsung,exynos4210-pwm";
>>
>> There is a reason to use a different compatible string for Exynos4210
>> rev0. The PWM block is used as a timer there, while on newer revs MCT is
>> used. Sorry, but I have to NAK this patch.
>>
> I remember why exynos4210-universal_c210 uses PWM...OK.
>
>> As I explained in my reply to patch 11/17, I'd suggest keeping the PWM
>> drivers as is, because there is no need to remove support for DT
>> compatible strings.
>>
> OK, let me remove pwm related patches in this series but I think need to
> update the compatible strings, at least remove non-support SoC in doc?...
Device tree bindings are defined according to the first SoC in which
given hardware variant appeared and since they are stable, they should
stay as is. I don't think it will have any negative effects on
maintenance costs and it doesn't imply that the SoC is still supported.
(Anyway, with DT you can boot virtually any SoC, without the kernel
being aware of it, as long as it supports all the necessary IP blocks.)
Best regards,
Tomasz
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 83+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 05/17] pwm: samsung: remove s5p64x0 related pwm codes
@ 2014-07-08 15:43 ` Tomasz Figa
0 siblings, 0 replies; 83+ messages in thread
From: Tomasz Figa @ 2014-07-08 15:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
Kukjin,
On 08.07.2014 00:23, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> On 07/04/14 17:10, Tomasz Figa wrote:
>> Hi Kukjin,
>>
> Tomasz,
>
>> On 30.06.2014 23:32, Kukjin Kim wrote:
>>> This patch removes supporting s5p64x0 related pwm codes because of
>>> no more support for S5P6440 and S5P6450 SoCs. And this patch changes
>>> the name of s5p6440-pwm to exynos-pwm instead.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim<kgene.kim@samsung.com>
>>> Cc: Thierry Reding<thierry.reding@gmail.com>
>>> ---
>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-samsung.txt | 1 -
>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210-universal_c210.dts | 2 +-
>>> drivers/clocksource/samsung_pwm_timer.c | 13 -------------
>>> drivers/pwm/pwm-samsung.c | 5 ++---
>>> 4 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-samsung.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-samsung.txt
>>> index 5538de9..43925d3 100644
>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-samsung.txt
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-samsung.txt
>>> @@ -11,7 +11,6 @@ Required properties:
>>> - compatible : should be one of following:
>>> samsung,s3c2410-pwm - for 16-bit timers present on S3C24xx SoCs
>>> samsung,s3c6400-pwm - for 32-bit timers present on S3C64xx SoCs
>>> - samsung,s5p6440-pwm - for 32-bit timers present on S5P64x0 SoCs
>>> samsung,s5pc100-pwm - for 32-bit timers present on S5PC100, S5PV210,
>>> Exynos4210 rev0 SoCs
>>> samsung,exynos4210-pwm - for 32-bit timers present on Exynos4210,
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210-universal_c210.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210-universal_c210.dts
>>> index d50eb3a..0ca26e0 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210-universal_c210.dts
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210-universal_c210.dts
>>> @@ -461,7 +461,7 @@
>>> };
>>>
>>> pwm at 139D0000 {
>>> - compatible = "samsung,s5p6440-pwm";
>>> + compatible = "samsung,exynos4210-pwm";
>>
>> There is a reason to use a different compatible string for Exynos4210
>> rev0. The PWM block is used as a timer there, while on newer revs MCT is
>> used. Sorry, but I have to NAK this patch.
>>
> I remember why exynos4210-universal_c210 uses PWM...OK.
>
>> As I explained in my reply to patch 11/17, I'd suggest keeping the PWM
>> drivers as is, because there is no need to remove support for DT
>> compatible strings.
>>
> OK, let me remove pwm related patches in this series but I think need to
> update the compatible strings, at least remove non-support SoC in doc?...
Device tree bindings are defined according to the first SoC in which
given hardware variant appeared and since they are stable, they should
stay as is. I don't think it will have any negative effects on
maintenance costs and it doesn't imply that the SoC is still supported.
(Anyway, with DT you can boot virtually any SoC, without the kernel
being aware of it, as long as it supports all the necessary IP blocks.)
Best regards,
Tomasz
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 83+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 14/17] mtd: onenand: remove s5pc100 related onenand codes
2014-06-30 21:32 ` Kukjin Kim
(?)
@ 2014-07-12 7:12 ` Brian Norris
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 83+ messages in thread
From: Brian Norris @ 2014-07-12 7:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kukjin Kim
Cc: linux-arm-kernel, linux-samsung-soc, Kyungmin Park,
David Woodhouse, linux-mtd
+ linux-mtd (please CC for anything driver/mtd/*; see MAINTAINERS)
On Tue, Jul 01, 2014 at 06:32:24AM +0900, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> This patch removes s5pc100 related onenand codes because of no more
> support for S5PC100 SoC in mainline.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
> Cc: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
> Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
> Cc: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/mtd/onenand/Kconfig | 4 ++--
> drivers/mtd/onenand/samsung.c | 25 +------------------------
> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/onenand/Kconfig b/drivers/mtd/onenand/Kconfig
> index ab26072..dcae2f6 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/onenand/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/onenand/Kconfig
> @@ -32,10 +32,10 @@ config MTD_ONENAND_OMAP2
>
> config MTD_ONENAND_SAMSUNG
> tristate "OneNAND on Samsung SOC controller support"
> - depends on ARCH_S3C64XX || ARCH_S5PC100 || ARCH_S5PV210 || ARCH_EXYNOS4
> + depends on ARCH_S3C64XX || ARCH_S5PV210 || ARCH_EXYNOS4
> help
> Support for a OneNAND flash device connected to an Samsung SOC.
> - S3C64XX/S5PC100 use command mapping method.
> + S3C64XX uses command mapping method.
> S5PC110/S5PC210 use generic OneNAND method.
>
> config MTD_ONENAND_OTP
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/onenand/samsung.c b/drivers/mtd/onenand/samsung.c
> index efb819c..19cfb97 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/onenand/samsung.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/onenand/samsung.c
> @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
> * published by the Free Software Foundation.
> *
> * Implementation:
> - * S3C64XX and S5PC100: emulate the pseudo BufferRAM
> + * S3C64XX: emulate the pseudo BufferRAM
> * S5PC110: use DMA
> */
>
> @@ -32,7 +32,6 @@
> enum soc_type {
> TYPE_S3C6400,
> TYPE_S3C6410,
> - TYPE_S5PC100,
> TYPE_S5PC110,
> };
>
> @@ -59,7 +58,6 @@ enum soc_type {
> #define MAP_11 (0x3)
>
> #define S3C64XX_CMD_MAP_SHIFT 24
> -#define S5PC100_CMD_MAP_SHIFT 26
>
> #define S3C6400_FBA_SHIFT 10
> #define S3C6400_FPA_SHIFT 4
> @@ -69,10 +67,6 @@ enum soc_type {
> #define S3C6410_FPA_SHIFT 6
> #define S3C6410_FSA_SHIFT 4
>
> -#define S5PC100_FBA_SHIFT 13
> -#define S5PC100_FPA_SHIFT 7
> -#define S5PC100_FSA_SHIFT 5
> -
> /* S5PC110 specific definitions */
> #define S5PC110_DMA_SRC_ADDR 0x400
> #define S5PC110_DMA_SRC_CFG 0x404
> @@ -195,11 +189,6 @@ static unsigned int s3c64xx_cmd_map(unsigned type, unsigned val)
> return (type << S3C64XX_CMD_MAP_SHIFT) | val;
> }
>
> -static unsigned int s5pc1xx_cmd_map(unsigned type, unsigned val)
> -{
> - return (type << S5PC100_CMD_MAP_SHIFT) | val;
> -}
> -
> static unsigned int s3c6400_mem_addr(int fba, int fpa, int fsa)
> {
> return (fba << S3C6400_FBA_SHIFT) | (fpa << S3C6400_FPA_SHIFT) |
> @@ -212,12 +201,6 @@ static unsigned int s3c6410_mem_addr(int fba, int fpa, int fsa)
> (fsa << S3C6410_FSA_SHIFT);
> }
>
> -static unsigned int s5pc100_mem_addr(int fba, int fpa, int fsa)
> -{
> - return (fba << S5PC100_FBA_SHIFT) | (fpa << S5PC100_FPA_SHIFT) |
> - (fsa << S5PC100_FSA_SHIFT);
> -}
> -
> static void s3c_onenand_reset(void)
> {
> unsigned long timeout = 0x10000;
> @@ -835,9 +818,6 @@ static void s3c_onenand_setup(struct mtd_info *mtd)
> } else if (onenand->type == TYPE_S3C6410) {
> onenand->mem_addr = s3c6410_mem_addr;
> onenand->cmd_map = s3c64xx_cmd_map;
> - } else if (onenand->type == TYPE_S5PC100) {
> - onenand->mem_addr = s5pc100_mem_addr;
> - onenand->cmd_map = s5pc1xx_cmd_map;
> } else if (onenand->type == TYPE_S5PC110) {
> /* Use generic onenand functions */
> this->read_bufferram = s5pc110_read_bufferram;
> @@ -1111,9 +1091,6 @@ static struct platform_device_id s3c_onenand_driver_ids[] = {
> .name = "s3c6410-onenand",
> .driver_data = TYPE_S3C6410,
> }, {
> - .name = "s5pc100-onenand",
> - .driver_data = TYPE_S5PC100,
> - }, {
> .name = "s5pc110-onenand",
> .driver_data = TYPE_S5PC110,
> }, { },
> --
> 1.7.10.4
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 83+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 14/17] mtd: onenand: remove s5pc100 related onenand codes
@ 2014-07-12 7:12 ` Brian Norris
0 siblings, 0 replies; 83+ messages in thread
From: Brian Norris @ 2014-07-12 7:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kukjin Kim
Cc: linux-mtd, Kyungmin Park, linux-samsung-soc, David Woodhouse,
linux-arm-kernel
+ linux-mtd (please CC for anything driver/mtd/*; see MAINTAINERS)
On Tue, Jul 01, 2014 at 06:32:24AM +0900, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> This patch removes s5pc100 related onenand codes because of no more
> support for S5PC100 SoC in mainline.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
> Cc: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
> Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
> Cc: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/mtd/onenand/Kconfig | 4 ++--
> drivers/mtd/onenand/samsung.c | 25 +------------------------
> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/onenand/Kconfig b/drivers/mtd/onenand/Kconfig
> index ab26072..dcae2f6 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/onenand/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/onenand/Kconfig
> @@ -32,10 +32,10 @@ config MTD_ONENAND_OMAP2
>
> config MTD_ONENAND_SAMSUNG
> tristate "OneNAND on Samsung SOC controller support"
> - depends on ARCH_S3C64XX || ARCH_S5PC100 || ARCH_S5PV210 || ARCH_EXYNOS4
> + depends on ARCH_S3C64XX || ARCH_S5PV210 || ARCH_EXYNOS4
> help
> Support for a OneNAND flash device connected to an Samsung SOC.
> - S3C64XX/S5PC100 use command mapping method.
> + S3C64XX uses command mapping method.
> S5PC110/S5PC210 use generic OneNAND method.
>
> config MTD_ONENAND_OTP
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/onenand/samsung.c b/drivers/mtd/onenand/samsung.c
> index efb819c..19cfb97 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/onenand/samsung.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/onenand/samsung.c
> @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
> * published by the Free Software Foundation.
> *
> * Implementation:
> - * S3C64XX and S5PC100: emulate the pseudo BufferRAM
> + * S3C64XX: emulate the pseudo BufferRAM
> * S5PC110: use DMA
> */
>
> @@ -32,7 +32,6 @@
> enum soc_type {
> TYPE_S3C6400,
> TYPE_S3C6410,
> - TYPE_S5PC100,
> TYPE_S5PC110,
> };
>
> @@ -59,7 +58,6 @@ enum soc_type {
> #define MAP_11 (0x3)
>
> #define S3C64XX_CMD_MAP_SHIFT 24
> -#define S5PC100_CMD_MAP_SHIFT 26
>
> #define S3C6400_FBA_SHIFT 10
> #define S3C6400_FPA_SHIFT 4
> @@ -69,10 +67,6 @@ enum soc_type {
> #define S3C6410_FPA_SHIFT 6
> #define S3C6410_FSA_SHIFT 4
>
> -#define S5PC100_FBA_SHIFT 13
> -#define S5PC100_FPA_SHIFT 7
> -#define S5PC100_FSA_SHIFT 5
> -
> /* S5PC110 specific definitions */
> #define S5PC110_DMA_SRC_ADDR 0x400
> #define S5PC110_DMA_SRC_CFG 0x404
> @@ -195,11 +189,6 @@ static unsigned int s3c64xx_cmd_map(unsigned type, unsigned val)
> return (type << S3C64XX_CMD_MAP_SHIFT) | val;
> }
>
> -static unsigned int s5pc1xx_cmd_map(unsigned type, unsigned val)
> -{
> - return (type << S5PC100_CMD_MAP_SHIFT) | val;
> -}
> -
> static unsigned int s3c6400_mem_addr(int fba, int fpa, int fsa)
> {
> return (fba << S3C6400_FBA_SHIFT) | (fpa << S3C6400_FPA_SHIFT) |
> @@ -212,12 +201,6 @@ static unsigned int s3c6410_mem_addr(int fba, int fpa, int fsa)
> (fsa << S3C6410_FSA_SHIFT);
> }
>
> -static unsigned int s5pc100_mem_addr(int fba, int fpa, int fsa)
> -{
> - return (fba << S5PC100_FBA_SHIFT) | (fpa << S5PC100_FPA_SHIFT) |
> - (fsa << S5PC100_FSA_SHIFT);
> -}
> -
> static void s3c_onenand_reset(void)
> {
> unsigned long timeout = 0x10000;
> @@ -835,9 +818,6 @@ static void s3c_onenand_setup(struct mtd_info *mtd)
> } else if (onenand->type == TYPE_S3C6410) {
> onenand->mem_addr = s3c6410_mem_addr;
> onenand->cmd_map = s3c64xx_cmd_map;
> - } else if (onenand->type == TYPE_S5PC100) {
> - onenand->mem_addr = s5pc100_mem_addr;
> - onenand->cmd_map = s5pc1xx_cmd_map;
> } else if (onenand->type == TYPE_S5PC110) {
> /* Use generic onenand functions */
> this->read_bufferram = s5pc110_read_bufferram;
> @@ -1111,9 +1091,6 @@ static struct platform_device_id s3c_onenand_driver_ids[] = {
> .name = "s3c6410-onenand",
> .driver_data = TYPE_S3C6410,
> }, {
> - .name = "s5pc100-onenand",
> - .driver_data = TYPE_S5PC100,
> - }, {
> .name = "s5pc110-onenand",
> .driver_data = TYPE_S5PC110,
> }, { },
> --
> 1.7.10.4
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 83+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 14/17] mtd: onenand: remove s5pc100 related onenand codes
@ 2014-07-12 7:12 ` Brian Norris
0 siblings, 0 replies; 83+ messages in thread
From: Brian Norris @ 2014-07-12 7:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
+ linux-mtd (please CC for anything driver/mtd/*; see MAINTAINERS)
On Tue, Jul 01, 2014 at 06:32:24AM +0900, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> This patch removes s5pc100 related onenand codes because of no more
> support for S5PC100 SoC in mainline.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
> Cc: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
> Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
> Cc: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/mtd/onenand/Kconfig | 4 ++--
> drivers/mtd/onenand/samsung.c | 25 +------------------------
> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/onenand/Kconfig b/drivers/mtd/onenand/Kconfig
> index ab26072..dcae2f6 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/onenand/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/onenand/Kconfig
> @@ -32,10 +32,10 @@ config MTD_ONENAND_OMAP2
>
> config MTD_ONENAND_SAMSUNG
> tristate "OneNAND on Samsung SOC controller support"
> - depends on ARCH_S3C64XX || ARCH_S5PC100 || ARCH_S5PV210 || ARCH_EXYNOS4
> + depends on ARCH_S3C64XX || ARCH_S5PV210 || ARCH_EXYNOS4
> help
> Support for a OneNAND flash device connected to an Samsung SOC.
> - S3C64XX/S5PC100 use command mapping method.
> + S3C64XX uses command mapping method.
> S5PC110/S5PC210 use generic OneNAND method.
>
> config MTD_ONENAND_OTP
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/onenand/samsung.c b/drivers/mtd/onenand/samsung.c
> index efb819c..19cfb97 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/onenand/samsung.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/onenand/samsung.c
> @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
> * published by the Free Software Foundation.
> *
> * Implementation:
> - * S3C64XX and S5PC100: emulate the pseudo BufferRAM
> + * S3C64XX: emulate the pseudo BufferRAM
> * S5PC110: use DMA
> */
>
> @@ -32,7 +32,6 @@
> enum soc_type {
> TYPE_S3C6400,
> TYPE_S3C6410,
> - TYPE_S5PC100,
> TYPE_S5PC110,
> };
>
> @@ -59,7 +58,6 @@ enum soc_type {
> #define MAP_11 (0x3)
>
> #define S3C64XX_CMD_MAP_SHIFT 24
> -#define S5PC100_CMD_MAP_SHIFT 26
>
> #define S3C6400_FBA_SHIFT 10
> #define S3C6400_FPA_SHIFT 4
> @@ -69,10 +67,6 @@ enum soc_type {
> #define S3C6410_FPA_SHIFT 6
> #define S3C6410_FSA_SHIFT 4
>
> -#define S5PC100_FBA_SHIFT 13
> -#define S5PC100_FPA_SHIFT 7
> -#define S5PC100_FSA_SHIFT 5
> -
> /* S5PC110 specific definitions */
> #define S5PC110_DMA_SRC_ADDR 0x400
> #define S5PC110_DMA_SRC_CFG 0x404
> @@ -195,11 +189,6 @@ static unsigned int s3c64xx_cmd_map(unsigned type, unsigned val)
> return (type << S3C64XX_CMD_MAP_SHIFT) | val;
> }
>
> -static unsigned int s5pc1xx_cmd_map(unsigned type, unsigned val)
> -{
> - return (type << S5PC100_CMD_MAP_SHIFT) | val;
> -}
> -
> static unsigned int s3c6400_mem_addr(int fba, int fpa, int fsa)
> {
> return (fba << S3C6400_FBA_SHIFT) | (fpa << S3C6400_FPA_SHIFT) |
> @@ -212,12 +201,6 @@ static unsigned int s3c6410_mem_addr(int fba, int fpa, int fsa)
> (fsa << S3C6410_FSA_SHIFT);
> }
>
> -static unsigned int s5pc100_mem_addr(int fba, int fpa, int fsa)
> -{
> - return (fba << S5PC100_FBA_SHIFT) | (fpa << S5PC100_FPA_SHIFT) |
> - (fsa << S5PC100_FSA_SHIFT);
> -}
> -
> static void s3c_onenand_reset(void)
> {
> unsigned long timeout = 0x10000;
> @@ -835,9 +818,6 @@ static void s3c_onenand_setup(struct mtd_info *mtd)
> } else if (onenand->type == TYPE_S3C6410) {
> onenand->mem_addr = s3c6410_mem_addr;
> onenand->cmd_map = s3c64xx_cmd_map;
> - } else if (onenand->type == TYPE_S5PC100) {
> - onenand->mem_addr = s5pc100_mem_addr;
> - onenand->cmd_map = s5pc1xx_cmd_map;
> } else if (onenand->type == TYPE_S5PC110) {
> /* Use generic onenand functions */
> this->read_bufferram = s5pc110_read_bufferram;
> @@ -1111,9 +1091,6 @@ static struct platform_device_id s3c_onenand_driver_ids[] = {
> .name = "s3c6410-onenand",
> .driver_data = TYPE_S3C6410,
> }, {
> - .name = "s5pc100-onenand",
> - .driver_data = TYPE_S5PC100,
> - }, {
> .name = "s5pc110-onenand",
> .driver_data = TYPE_S5PC110,
> }, { },
> --
> 1.7.10.4
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 83+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 17/17] ASoC: Samsung: remove s5pc100 related codes
2014-06-30 21:32 ` Kukjin Kim
@ 2014-07-14 18:05 ` Mark Brown
-1 siblings, 0 replies; 83+ messages in thread
From: Mark Brown @ 2014-07-14 18:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kukjin Kim; +Cc: linux-arm-kernel, linux-samsung-soc
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 160 bytes --]
On Tue, Jul 01, 2014 at 06:32:27AM +0900, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> This patch removes s5pc100 related codes in
> <linux/platform_data/asoc-s3c.h>.
Applied, thanks.
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 83+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 17/17] ASoC: Samsung: remove s5pc100 related codes
@ 2014-07-14 18:05 ` Mark Brown
0 siblings, 0 replies; 83+ messages in thread
From: Mark Brown @ 2014-07-14 18:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On Tue, Jul 01, 2014 at 06:32:27AM +0900, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> This patch removes s5pc100 related codes in
> <linux/platform_data/asoc-s3c.h>.
Applied, thanks.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20140714/328f9c47/attachment.sig>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 83+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-07-14 18:05 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 83+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-06-30 21:32 [PATCH 00/17] ARM: S5P64X0, S5PC100: no more support in mainline Kukjin Kim
2014-06-30 21:32 ` Kukjin Kim
2014-06-30 13:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-06-30 13:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-06-30 14:22 ` Thierry Reding
2014-06-30 14:22 ` Thierry Reding
2014-06-30 14:31 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-06-30 14:31 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-07-01 2:08 ` Kukjin Kim
2014-07-01 2:08 ` Kukjin Kim
2014-06-30 15:31 ` Tushar Behera
2014-06-30 15:31 ` Tushar Behera
2014-07-01 2:08 ` Kukjin Kim
2014-07-01 2:08 ` Kukjin Kim
2014-06-30 21:32 ` [PATCH 02/17] gpio: samsung: remove s5p64x0 related gpio codes Kukjin Kim
2014-06-30 21:32 ` Kukjin Kim
2014-07-07 16:05 ` Linus Walleij
2014-07-07 16:05 ` Linus Walleij
2014-06-30 21:32 ` [PATCH 03/17] spi: s3c64xx: remove s5p64x0 related spi codes Kukjin Kim
2014-06-30 21:32 ` Kukjin Kim
2014-06-30 21:32 ` [PATCH 04/17] ASoC: samsung: no more support for S5P6440 and S5P6450 SoCs Kukjin Kim
2014-06-30 21:32 ` Kukjin Kim
2014-06-30 21:32 ` [PATCH 05/17] pwm: samsung: remove s5p64x0 related pwm codes Kukjin Kim
2014-06-30 21:32 ` Kukjin Kim
2014-07-04 8:10 ` Tomasz Figa
2014-07-04 8:10 ` Tomasz Figa
2014-07-07 22:23 ` Kukjin Kim
2014-07-07 22:23 ` Kukjin Kim
2014-07-08 15:43 ` Tomasz Figa
2014-07-08 15:43 ` Tomasz Figa
2014-06-30 21:32 ` [PATCH 06/17] video: fbdev: s3c-fb: remove s5p64x0 related fimd codes Kukjin Kim
2014-06-30 21:32 ` Kukjin Kim
2014-07-01 2:04 ` Jingoo Han
2014-07-01 2:04 ` Jingoo Han
2014-07-01 6:25 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2014-07-01 6:25 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2014-06-30 21:32 ` [PATCH 07/17] serial: samsung: no more support for S5P6440 and S5P6450 SoCs Kukjin Kim
2014-06-30 21:32 ` Kukjin Kim
2014-06-30 21:32 ` [PATCH 09/17] gpio: samsung: remov s5pc100 related gpio codes Kukjin Kim
2014-06-30 21:32 ` Kukjin Kim
2014-07-07 16:05 ` Linus Walleij
2014-07-07 16:05 ` Linus Walleij
2014-06-30 21:32 ` [PATCH 10/17] spi: s3c64xx: remove s5pc100 related spi codes Kukjin Kim
2014-06-30 21:32 ` Kukjin Kim
2014-06-30 21:32 ` [PATCH 11/17] pwm: samsung: remove s5pc100 related pwm codes Kukjin Kim
2014-06-30 21:32 ` Kukjin Kim
2014-07-03 12:44 ` Tomasz Figa
2014-07-03 12:44 ` Tomasz Figa
2014-07-04 7:32 ` Kukjin Kim
2014-07-04 7:32 ` Kukjin Kim
2014-07-04 8:07 ` Tomasz Figa
2014-07-04 8:07 ` Tomasz Figa
2014-06-30 21:32 ` [PATCH 12/17] serial: samsung: no more support for S5PC100 SoC Kukjin Kim
2014-06-30 21:32 ` Kukjin Kim
2014-06-30 21:32 ` [PATCH 13/17] ata: pata_samsung_cf: removes s5pc100 related ata codes Kukjin Kim
2014-06-30 21:32 ` Kukjin Kim
2014-06-30 14:49 ` Tejun Heo
2014-06-30 14:49 ` Tejun Heo
2014-06-30 21:32 ` [PATCH 14/17] mtd: onenand: remove s5pc100 related onenand codes Kukjin Kim
2014-06-30 21:32 ` Kukjin Kim
2014-07-12 7:12 ` Brian Norris
2014-07-12 7:12 ` Brian Norris
2014-07-12 7:12 ` Brian Norris
2014-06-30 21:32 ` [PATCH 15/17] video: fbdev: s3c-fb: remove s5pc100 related fimd and fb codes Kukjin Kim
2014-06-30 21:32 ` Kukjin Kim
2014-07-01 2:05 ` Jingoo Han
2014-07-01 2:05 ` Jingoo Han
2014-06-30 21:32 ` [PATCH 16/17] [media] exynos4-is: removes s5pc100 related fimc codes Kukjin Kim
2014-06-30 21:32 ` Kukjin Kim
2014-06-30 14:03 ` Sylwester Nawrocki
2014-06-30 14:03 ` Sylwester Nawrocki
2014-06-30 21:32 ` [PATCH 17/17] ASoC: Samsung: remove s5pc100 related codes Kukjin Kim
2014-06-30 21:32 ` Kukjin Kim
2014-07-14 18:05 ` Mark Brown
2014-07-14 18:05 ` Mark Brown
2014-07-02 18:02 ` [PATCH 00/17] ARM: S5P64X0, S5PC100: no more support in mainline Tomasz Figa
2014-07-02 18:02 ` Tomasz Figa
2014-07-02 22:46 ` Kukjin Kim
2014-07-02 22:46 ` Kukjin Kim
2014-07-03 3:35 ` Sachin Kamat
2014-07-03 3:35 ` Sachin Kamat
2014-07-04 8:43 ` Kukjin Kim
2014-07-04 8:43 ` Kukjin Kim
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.