* [PATCH 1/1] rcu: Check for have_rcu_nocb_mask instead of rcu_nocb_mask
@ 2014-07-17 21:30 Pranith Kumar
2014-07-17 23:49 ` Paul E. McKenney
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Pranith Kumar @ 2014-07-17 21:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Paul E. McKenney, Josh Triplett, Steven Rostedt,
Mathieu Desnoyers, Lai Jiangshan, open list:READ-COPY UPDATE...
Hi Paul,
This is something similar to what you found yesterday with tick_nohz_full mask.
--
Pranith
If we configure a kernel with CONFIG_NOCB_CPU=y, CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU_NONE=y and
CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK=n and do not pass in a rcu_nocb= boot parameter, the
cpumask rcu_nocb_mask can be garbage instead of NULL.
Hence this commit replaces checks for rcu_nocb_mask == NULL with a check for
have_rcu_nocb_mask.
Signed-off-by: Pranith Kumar <bobby.prani@gmail.com>
---
kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
index cedb020..15c00b5 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
@@ -2542,7 +2542,7 @@ static void __init rcu_organize_nocb_kthreads(struct rcu_state *rsp)
struct rcu_data *rdp_leader = NULL; /* Suppress misguided gcc warn. */
struct rcu_data *rdp_prev = NULL;
- if (rcu_nocb_mask == NULL)
+ if (!have_rcu_nocb_mask)
return;
#ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL
cpumask_or(rcu_nocb_mask, rcu_nocb_mask, tick_nohz_full_mask);
@@ -2575,7 +2575,7 @@ static void __init rcu_organize_nocb_kthreads(struct rcu_state *rsp)
/* Prevent __call_rcu() from enqueuing callbacks on no-CBs CPUs */
static bool init_nocb_callback_list(struct rcu_data *rdp)
{
- if (rcu_nocb_mask == NULL ||
+ if (have_rcu_nocb_mask == false ||
!cpumask_test_cpu(rdp->cpu, rcu_nocb_mask))
return false;
rdp->nxttail[RCU_NEXT_TAIL] = NULL;
--
1.9.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/1] rcu: Check for have_rcu_nocb_mask instead of rcu_nocb_mask
2014-07-17 21:30 [PATCH 1/1] rcu: Check for have_rcu_nocb_mask instead of rcu_nocb_mask Pranith Kumar
@ 2014-07-17 23:49 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-07-18 0:11 ` Pranith Kumar
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Paul E. McKenney @ 2014-07-17 23:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pranith Kumar
Cc: Josh Triplett, Steven Rostedt, Mathieu Desnoyers, Lai Jiangshan,
open list:READ-COPY UPDATE...
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 05:30:11PM -0400, Pranith Kumar wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> This is something similar to what you found yesterday with tick_nohz_full mask.
>
> --
> Pranith
>
> If we configure a kernel with CONFIG_NOCB_CPU=y, CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU_NONE=y and
> CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK=n and do not pass in a rcu_nocb= boot parameter, the
> cpumask rcu_nocb_mask can be garbage instead of NULL.
>
> Hence this commit replaces checks for rcu_nocb_mask == NULL with a check for
> have_rcu_nocb_mask.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pranith Kumar <bobby.prani@gmail.com>
Good catch! Could you please forward-port this to current rcu/dev?
This now includes the fix you mentioned above, which generates conflicts.
Could you please also fix the use in rcu_is_nocb_cpu()?
And please see the comment below.
Thanx, Paul
> ---
> kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
> index cedb020..15c00b5 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
> @@ -2542,7 +2542,7 @@ static void __init rcu_organize_nocb_kthreads(struct rcu_state *rsp)
> struct rcu_data *rdp_leader = NULL; /* Suppress misguided gcc warn. */
> struct rcu_data *rdp_prev = NULL;
>
> - if (rcu_nocb_mask == NULL)
> + if (!have_rcu_nocb_mask)
> return;
> #ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL
> cpumask_or(rcu_nocb_mask, rcu_nocb_mask, tick_nohz_full_mask);
> @@ -2575,7 +2575,7 @@ static void __init rcu_organize_nocb_kthreads(struct rcu_state *rsp)
> /* Prevent __call_rcu() from enqueuing callbacks on no-CBs CPUs */
> static bool init_nocb_callback_list(struct rcu_data *rdp)
> {
> - if (rcu_nocb_mask == NULL ||
> + if (have_rcu_nocb_mask == false ||
This should really be "if (!have_rcu_nocb_mask".
Of course, the original should have been "if (!rcu_nocb_mask", but old
habits die hard. ;-)
> !cpumask_test_cpu(rdp->cpu, rcu_nocb_mask))
> return false;
> rdp->nxttail[RCU_NEXT_TAIL] = NULL;
> --
> 1.9.1
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/1] rcu: Check for have_rcu_nocb_mask instead of rcu_nocb_mask
2014-07-17 23:49 ` Paul E. McKenney
@ 2014-07-18 0:11 ` Pranith Kumar
2014-07-19 6:10 ` Paul E. McKenney
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Pranith Kumar @ 2014-07-18 0:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: paulmck
Cc: Josh Triplett, Steven Rostedt, Mathieu Desnoyers, Lai Jiangshan,
open list:READ-COPY UPDATE...
On 07/17/2014 07:49 PM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 05:30:11PM -0400, Pranith Kumar wrote:
>> Hi Paul,
>>
>> This is something similar to what you found yesterday with tick_nohz_full mask.
>>
>> --
>> Pranith
>>
>> If we configure a kernel with CONFIG_NOCB_CPU=y, CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU_NONE=y and
>> CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK=n and do not pass in a rcu_nocb= boot parameter, the
>> cpumask rcu_nocb_mask can be garbage instead of NULL.
>>
>> Hence this commit replaces checks for rcu_nocb_mask == NULL with a check for
>> have_rcu_nocb_mask.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Pranith Kumar <bobby.prani@gmail.com>
>
> Good catch! Could you please forward-port this to current rcu/dev?
> This now includes the fix you mentioned above, which generates conflicts.
>
> Could you please also fix the use in rcu_is_nocb_cpu()?
>
> And please see the comment below.
>
Please find the fixed patch.
--
Pranith
From: Pranith Kumar <bobby.prani@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2014 20:02:54 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] rcu: Feedback comments
If we configure a kernel with CONFIG_NOCB_CPU=y, CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU_NONE=y and
CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK=n and do not pass in a rcu_nocb= boot parameter, the
cpumask rcu_nocb_mask can be garbage instead of NULL.
Hence this commit replaces checks for rcu_nocb_mask == NULL with a check for
have_rcu_nocb_mask.
Signed-off-by: Pranith Kumar <bobby.prani@gmail.com>
---
kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h | 13 +++++++------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
index ce8c331..8f987c1 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
@@ -2053,9 +2053,10 @@ static void rcu_init_one_nocb(struct rcu_node *rnp)
/* Is the specified CPU a no-CBs CPU? */
bool rcu_is_nocb_cpu(int cpu)
{
- if (have_rcu_nocb_mask)
- return cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, rcu_nocb_mask);
- return false;
+ if (!have_rcu_nocb_mask)
+ return false;
+
+ return cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, rcu_nocb_mask);
}
#endif /* #ifndef CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU_ALL */
@@ -2540,7 +2541,7 @@ static void __init rcu_organize_nocb_kthreads(struct rcu_state *rsp)
struct rcu_data *rdp_leader = NULL; /* Suppress misguided gcc warn. */
struct rcu_data *rdp_prev = NULL;
- if (rcu_nocb_mask == NULL)
+ if (!have_rcu_nocb_mask)
return;
#if defined(CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL) && !defined(CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL_ALL)
if (tick_nohz_full_running)
@@ -2574,9 +2575,9 @@ static void __init rcu_organize_nocb_kthreads(struct rcu_state *rsp)
/* Prevent __call_rcu() from enqueuing callbacks on no-CBs CPUs */
static bool init_nocb_callback_list(struct rcu_data *rdp)
{
- if (rcu_nocb_mask == NULL ||
- !cpumask_test_cpu(rdp->cpu, rcu_nocb_mask))
+ if (!rcu_is_nocb_cpu(rdp->cpu))
return false;
+
rdp->nxttail[RCU_NEXT_TAIL] = NULL;
return true;
}
--
1.9.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/1] rcu: Check for have_rcu_nocb_mask instead of rcu_nocb_mask
2014-07-18 0:11 ` Pranith Kumar
@ 2014-07-19 6:10 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-07-19 6:32 ` Pranith Kumar
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Paul E. McKenney @ 2014-07-19 6:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pranith Kumar
Cc: Josh Triplett, Steven Rostedt, Mathieu Desnoyers, Lai Jiangshan,
open list:READ-COPY UPDATE...
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 08:11:01PM -0400, Pranith Kumar wrote:
> On 07/17/2014 07:49 PM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 05:30:11PM -0400, Pranith Kumar wrote:
> >> Hi Paul,
> >>
> >> This is something similar to what you found yesterday with tick_nohz_full mask.
> >>
> >> --
> >> Pranith
> >>
> >> If we configure a kernel with CONFIG_NOCB_CPU=y, CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU_NONE=y and
> >> CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK=n and do not pass in a rcu_nocb= boot parameter, the
> >> cpumask rcu_nocb_mask can be garbage instead of NULL.
> >>
> >> Hence this commit replaces checks for rcu_nocb_mask == NULL with a check for
> >> have_rcu_nocb_mask.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Pranith Kumar <bobby.prani@gmail.com>
> >
> > Good catch! Could you please forward-port this to current rcu/dev?
> > This now includes the fix you mentioned above, which generates conflicts.
> >
> > Could you please also fix the use in rcu_is_nocb_cpu()?
> >
> > And please see the comment below.
> >
>
> Please find the fixed patch.
>
> --
> Pranith
>
>
> From: Pranith Kumar <bobby.prani@gmail.com>
> Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2014 20:02:54 -0400
> Subject: [PATCH 1/1] rcu: Feedback comments
>
> If we configure a kernel with CONFIG_NOCB_CPU=y, CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU_NONE=y and
> CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK=n and do not pass in a rcu_nocb= boot parameter, the
> cpumask rcu_nocb_mask can be garbage instead of NULL.
>
> Hence this commit replaces checks for rcu_nocb_mask == NULL with a check for
> have_rcu_nocb_mask.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pranith Kumar <bobby.prani@gmail.com>
> ---
> kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h | 13 +++++++------
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
> index ce8c331..8f987c1 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
> @@ -2053,9 +2053,10 @@ static void rcu_init_one_nocb(struct rcu_node *rnp)
> /* Is the specified CPU a no-CBs CPU? */
> bool rcu_is_nocb_cpu(int cpu)
> {
> - if (have_rcu_nocb_mask)
> - return cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, rcu_nocb_mask);
> - return false;
> + if (!have_rcu_nocb_mask)
> + return false;
> +
> + return cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, rcu_nocb_mask);
Hmmm... That was a subtle way to tell me that my feedback was bogus. ;-)
I guess I need to stop reviewing patches at 2AM local time.
Anyway, you are correct, this was OK to start with, so I am dropping
this hunk.
I queued the other two for 3.18.
Thanx, Paul
> }
> #endif /* #ifndef CONFIG_RCU_NOCB_CPU_ALL */
>
> @@ -2540,7 +2541,7 @@ static void __init rcu_organize_nocb_kthreads(struct rcu_state *rsp)
> struct rcu_data *rdp_leader = NULL; /* Suppress misguided gcc warn. */
> struct rcu_data *rdp_prev = NULL;
>
> - if (rcu_nocb_mask == NULL)
> + if (!have_rcu_nocb_mask)
> return;
> #if defined(CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL) && !defined(CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL_ALL)
> if (tick_nohz_full_running)
> @@ -2574,9 +2575,9 @@ static void __init rcu_organize_nocb_kthreads(struct rcu_state *rsp)
> /* Prevent __call_rcu() from enqueuing callbacks on no-CBs CPUs */
> static bool init_nocb_callback_list(struct rcu_data *rdp)
> {
> - if (rcu_nocb_mask == NULL ||
> - !cpumask_test_cpu(rdp->cpu, rcu_nocb_mask))
> + if (!rcu_is_nocb_cpu(rdp->cpu))
> return false;
> +
> rdp->nxttail[RCU_NEXT_TAIL] = NULL;
> return true;
> }
> --
> 1.9.1
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 1/1] rcu: Check for have_rcu_nocb_mask instead of rcu_nocb_mask
2014-07-19 6:10 ` Paul E. McKenney
@ 2014-07-19 6:32 ` Pranith Kumar
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Pranith Kumar @ 2014-07-19 6:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: paulmck
Cc: Josh Triplett, Steven Rostedt, Mathieu Desnoyers, Lai Jiangshan,
open list:READ-COPY UPDATE...
On 07/19/2014 02:10 AM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
>> index ce8c331..8f987c1 100644
>> --- a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
>> +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
>> @@ -2053,9 +2053,10 @@ static void rcu_init_one_nocb(struct rcu_node *rnp)
>> /* Is the specified CPU a no-CBs CPU? */
>> bool rcu_is_nocb_cpu(int cpu)
>> {
>> - if (have_rcu_nocb_mask)
>> - return cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, rcu_nocb_mask);
>> - return false;
>> + if (!have_rcu_nocb_mask)
>> + return false;
>> +
>> + return cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, rcu_nocb_mask);
>
> Hmmm... That was a subtle way to tell me that my feedback was bogus. ;-)
> I guess I need to stop reviewing patches at 2AM local time.
>
> Anyway, you are correct, this was OK to start with, so I am dropping
> this hunk.
>
I thought you wanted me to change the check of the have_rcu_nocb_mask, and I
really think the new version is better. But yes, more of a style change :)
--
Pranith
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-07-19 6:32 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-07-17 21:30 [PATCH 1/1] rcu: Check for have_rcu_nocb_mask instead of rcu_nocb_mask Pranith Kumar
2014-07-17 23:49 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-07-18 0:11 ` Pranith Kumar
2014-07-19 6:10 ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-07-19 6:32 ` Pranith Kumar
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.