All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com, therbert@google.com,
	alexander.h.duyck@intel.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] ipv6: refresh rt6i_genid in ip6_pol_route()
Date: Sun, 07 Sep 2014 22:07:09 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1410152829.11872.84.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140907.215943.213418445039957641.davem@davemloft.net>

On Sun, 2014-09-07 at 21:59 -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
> Date: Sun, 07 Sep 2014 21:43:54 -0700
> 
> > On Sun, 2014-09-07 at 21:27 -0700, David Miller wrote:
> >> From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
> >> Date: Sun, 07 Sep 2014 21:18:25 -0700
> >> 
> >> > On Sun, 2014-09-07 at 15:54 -0700, David Miller wrote:
> >> > 
> >> >> This might be broken.
> >> >> 
> >> >> We are dealing here with persistent entries in the ipv6 routine trie.
> >> >> 
> >> >> If you just bump the genid on the next person to look it up, other
> >> >> sockets and cached entities might not have validated the route yet,
> >> >> and now will falsely see the route as valid.  We have to ensure that
> >> >> they too drop this route and perform a relookup.
> >> > 
> >> > I am confused, I thought it was the role of the cookie.
> >> > 
> >> > (Ie socket has to store its own cookie to be able to validate a route)
> >> > 
> >> > Before 6f3118b571b8 patch, how was this done anyway ?
> >> > 
> >> > If persistent routes cannot refresh the genid, then they are useless ?
> >> 
> >> I just speak about the genid aspect.
> >> 
> >> I understand that cookie (via node->fn_sernum) invalidates the path
> >> in the fib_trie, but the genid protects against other circumstances
> >> (matching IPSEC rule, f.e.)
> >> 
> >> You have to make sure all other sockets did a full route lookup
> >> (including IPSEC) before you can safely adjust the genid.
> >> 
> >> I could be wrong, recheck my analysis please :-)
> > 
> > So this whole genid protection can not work, unless we make sure a
> > socket cannot share a route with another socket.
> > 
> > This means we have to clone all routes.
> 
> I'm willing to revert the change in question if you think that's the
> sanest way forward.
> 
> The bug fix for more obscure use cases (IPSEC) if pointless if it
> breaks more common things (TCP input route caching).

Lets wait for Nicolas and/or Hannes input, they might have some ideas...

  reply	other threads:[~2014-09-08  5:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-08-14 18:19 Performance regression on kernels 3.10 and newer Alexander Duyck
2014-08-14 18:46 ` Eric Dumazet
2014-08-14 19:50   ` Eric Dumazet
2014-08-14 19:59   ` Rick Jones
2014-08-14 20:31     ` Alexander Duyck
2014-08-14 20:51       ` Eric Dumazet
2014-08-14 20:46     ` Eric Dumazet
2014-08-14 23:16   ` Alexander Duyck
2014-08-14 23:20     ` David Miller
2014-08-14 23:25       ` Tom Herbert
2014-08-21 23:24         ` David Miller
2014-09-06 14:45           ` Eric Dumazet
2014-09-06 15:27             ` Eric Dumazet
2014-09-06 15:46               ` Eric Dumazet
2014-09-06 16:38                 ` Eric Dumazet
2014-09-06 18:21                   ` Eric Dumazet
2014-09-07 19:05                     ` [PATCH net] ipv6: refresh rt6i_genid in ip6_pol_route() Eric Dumazet
2014-09-07 22:54                       ` David Miller
2014-09-08  4:18                         ` Eric Dumazet
2014-09-08  4:27                           ` David Miller
2014-09-08  4:43                             ` Eric Dumazet
2014-09-08  4:59                               ` David Miller
2014-09-08  5:07                                 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2014-09-08  8:11                                   ` Nicolas Dichtel
2014-09-08 10:28                                     ` Eric Dumazet
2014-09-08 12:16                                       ` Nicolas Dichtel
2014-09-08 18:48                                   ` Vlad Yasevich
2014-09-09 12:58                                   ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2014-09-10  9:31                                     ` [PATCH net-next] ipv6: implement rt_genid_bump_ipv6 with fn_sernum and remove rt6i_genid Hannes Frederic Sowa
2014-09-10 13:26                                       ` Vlad Yasevich
2014-09-10 13:42                                         ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2014-09-10 20:09                                       ` David Miller
2014-09-11  8:30                                         ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2014-09-11 12:22                                           ` Vlad Yasevich
2014-09-11 12:40                                             ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2014-09-11 12:05                                         ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2014-09-11 14:19                                           ` Vlad Yasevich
2014-09-11 14:32                                             ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2014-09-11 14:44                                               ` Vlad Yasevich
2014-09-11 14:47                                                 ` Hannes Frederic Sowa
2014-09-08 15:06               ` [PATCH v2 net-next] tcp: remove dst refcount false sharing for prequeue mode Eric Dumazet
2014-09-08 21:21                 ` David Miller
2014-09-08 21:30                   ` Eric Dumazet
2014-09-08 22:41                     ` David Miller
2014-09-09 23:56                     ` David Miller
2014-08-15 17:15       ` Performance regression on kernels 3.10 and newer Alexander Duyck
2014-08-15 17:59         ` Eric Dumazet
2014-08-15 18:49         ` Tom Herbert
2014-08-15 19:10           ` Alexander Duyck
2014-08-15 22:16             ` Tom Herbert
2014-08-15 23:23               ` Alexander Duyck
2014-08-18  9:03                 ` David Laight
2014-08-18 15:22                   ` Alexander Duyck
2014-08-18 15:29                     ` Rick Jones
2014-08-21 23:51         ` David Miller
2014-08-14 23:48     ` Eric Dumazet
2014-08-15  0:33       ` Rick Jones

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1410152829.11872.84.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com \
    --to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=alexander.h.duyck@intel.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com \
    --cc=therbert@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.