All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH net-next v2 0/7] bonding: get rid of curr_slave_lock
@ 2014-09-11 20:49 Nikolay Aleksandrov
  2014-09-11 20:49 ` [PATCH net-next v2 1/7] bonding: 3ad: clean up curr_slave_lock usage Nikolay Aleksandrov
                   ` (7 more replies)
  0 siblings, 8 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Nikolay Aleksandrov @ 2014-09-11 20:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: netdev; +Cc: vfalico, j.vosburgh, andy, davem, Nikolay Aleksandrov

Hi all,
This is the second patch-set dealing with bond locking and the purpose here
is to convert curr_slave_lock into a spinlock called "mode_lock" which can
be used in the various modes for their specific needs. The first three
patches cleanup the use of curr_slave_lock and prepare it for the
conversion which is done in patch 4 and then the modes that were using
their own locks are converted to use the new "mode_lock" giving us the
opportunity to remove their locks.
This patch-set has been tested in each mode by running enslave/release of
slaves in parallel with traffic transmission and miimon=1 i.e. running
all the time. In fact this lead to the discovery of a subtle bug related to
RCU which will be fixed in -net.
Also did an allmodconfig test just in case :-)

v2: fix bond_3ad_state_machine_handler's use of mode_lock and
    curr_slave_lock

Best regards,
 Nikolay Aleksandrov


Nikolay Aleksandrov (7):
  bonding: 3ad: clean up curr_slave_lock usage
  bonding: alb: remove curr_slave_lock
  bonding: clean curr_slave_lock use
  bonding: convert curr_slave_lock to a spinlock and rename it
  bonding: alb: convert to bond->mode_lock
  bonding: 3ad: convert to bond->mode_lock
  bonding: adjust locking comments

 drivers/net/bonding/bond_3ad.c     |  84 ++++++--------------
 drivers/net/bonding/bond_3ad.h     |   1 -
 drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c     | 159 +++++++++----------------------------
 drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.h     |   2 -
 drivers/net/bonding/bond_debugfs.c |   4 +-
 drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c    |  89 ++++-----------------
 drivers/net/bonding/bond_options.c |  10 +--
 drivers/net/bonding/bonding.h      |  16 ++--
 8 files changed, 91 insertions(+), 274 deletions(-)

-- 
1.9.3

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [PATCH net-next v2 1/7] bonding: 3ad: clean up curr_slave_lock usage
  2014-09-11 20:49 [PATCH net-next v2 0/7] bonding: get rid of curr_slave_lock Nikolay Aleksandrov
@ 2014-09-11 20:49 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
  2014-09-11 20:49 ` [PATCH net-next v2 2/7] bonding: alb: remove curr_slave_lock Nikolay Aleksandrov
                   ` (6 subsequent siblings)
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Nikolay Aleksandrov @ 2014-09-11 20:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: netdev; +Cc: vfalico, j.vosburgh, andy, davem, Nikolay Aleksandrov

Remove the read_lock in bond_3ad_lacpdu_recv() since when the slave is
being released its rx_handler is removed before 3ad unbind, so even if
packets arrive, they won't see the slave in an inconsistent state.

Signed-off-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@redhat.com>
---
v2: Only remove the curr_slave_lock from bond_3ad_lacpdu_recv, leave it in
    bond_3ad_state_machine_handler

 drivers/net/bonding/bond_3ad.c | 10 +++-------
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_3ad.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_3ad.c
index 5d27a6207384..dfd3a7835d17 100644
--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_3ad.c
+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_3ad.c
@@ -2476,20 +2476,16 @@ err_free:
 int bond_3ad_lacpdu_recv(const struct sk_buff *skb, struct bonding *bond,
 			 struct slave *slave)
 {
-	int ret = RX_HANDLER_ANOTHER;
 	struct lacpdu *lacpdu, _lacpdu;
 
 	if (skb->protocol != PKT_TYPE_LACPDU)
-		return ret;
+		return RX_HANDLER_ANOTHER;
 
 	lacpdu = skb_header_pointer(skb, 0, sizeof(_lacpdu), &_lacpdu);
 	if (!lacpdu)
-		return ret;
+		return RX_HANDLER_ANOTHER;
 
-	read_lock(&bond->curr_slave_lock);
-	ret = bond_3ad_rx_indication(lacpdu, slave, skb->len);
-	read_unlock(&bond->curr_slave_lock);
-	return ret;
+	return bond_3ad_rx_indication(lacpdu, slave, skb->len);
 }
 
 /**
-- 
1.9.3

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [PATCH net-next v2 2/7] bonding: alb: remove curr_slave_lock
  2014-09-11 20:49 [PATCH net-next v2 0/7] bonding: get rid of curr_slave_lock Nikolay Aleksandrov
  2014-09-11 20:49 ` [PATCH net-next v2 1/7] bonding: 3ad: clean up curr_slave_lock usage Nikolay Aleksandrov
@ 2014-09-11 20:49 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
  2014-09-11 20:49 ` [PATCH net-next v2 3/7] bonding: clean curr_slave_lock use Nikolay Aleksandrov
                   ` (5 subsequent siblings)
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Nikolay Aleksandrov @ 2014-09-11 20:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: netdev; +Cc: vfalico, j.vosburgh, andy, davem, Nikolay Aleksandrov

First in rlb_teach_disabled_mac_on_primary() it's okay to remove
curr_slave_lock as all callers except bond_alb_monitor() already hold
RTNL, and in case bond_alb_monitor() is executing we can at most have a
period with bad throughput (very unlikely though).
In bond_alb_monitor() it's okay to remove the read_lock as the slave
list is walked with RCU and the worst that could happen is another
transmitter at the same time and thus for a period which currently is 10
seconds (bond_alb.h: BOND_ALB_LP_TICKS).
And bond_alb_handle_active_change() is okay because it's always called
with RTNL. Removed the ASSERT_RTNL() because it'll be inserted in the
parent function in a following patch.

Signed-off-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@redhat.com>
---
 drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c | 39 +++------------------------------------
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c
index 028496205f39..cf4ede8594ff 100644
--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c
+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c
@@ -447,7 +447,7 @@ static struct slave *__rlb_next_rx_slave(struct bonding *bond)
 /* teach the switch the mac of a disabled slave
  * on the primary for fault tolerance
  *
- * Caller must hold bond->curr_slave_lock for write or bond lock for write
+ * Caller must hold RTNL
  */
 static void rlb_teach_disabled_mac_on_primary(struct bonding *bond, u8 addr[])
 {
@@ -512,12 +512,8 @@ static void rlb_clear_slave(struct bonding *bond, struct slave *slave)
 
 	_unlock_rx_hashtbl_bh(bond);
 
-	write_lock_bh(&bond->curr_slave_lock);
-
 	if (slave != bond_deref_active_protected(bond))
 		rlb_teach_disabled_mac_on_primary(bond, slave->dev->dev_addr);
-
-	write_unlock_bh(&bond->curr_slave_lock);
 }
 
 static void rlb_update_client(struct rlb_client_info *client_info)
@@ -1595,13 +1591,6 @@ void bond_alb_monitor(struct work_struct *work)
 	if (bond_info->lp_counter >= BOND_ALB_LP_TICKS(bond)) {
 		bool strict_match;
 
-		/* change of curr_active_slave involves swapping of mac addresses.
-		 * in order to avoid this swapping from happening while
-		 * sending the learning packets, the curr_slave_lock must be held for
-		 * read.
-		 */
-		read_lock(&bond->curr_slave_lock);
-
 		bond_for_each_slave_rcu(bond, slave, iter) {
 			/* If updating current_active, use all currently
 			 * user mac addreses (!strict_match).  Otherwise, only
@@ -1613,17 +1602,11 @@ void bond_alb_monitor(struct work_struct *work)
 			alb_send_learning_packets(slave, slave->dev->dev_addr,
 						  strict_match);
 		}
-
-		read_unlock(&bond->curr_slave_lock);
-
 		bond_info->lp_counter = 0;
 	}
 
 	/* rebalance tx traffic */
 	if (bond_info->tx_rebalance_counter >= BOND_TLB_REBALANCE_TICKS) {
-
-		read_lock(&bond->curr_slave_lock);
-
 		bond_for_each_slave_rcu(bond, slave, iter) {
 			tlb_clear_slave(bond, slave, 1);
 			if (slave == rcu_access_pointer(bond->curr_active_slave)) {
@@ -1633,9 +1616,6 @@ void bond_alb_monitor(struct work_struct *work)
 				bond_info->unbalanced_load = 0;
 			}
 		}
-
-		read_unlock(&bond->curr_slave_lock);
-
 		bond_info->tx_rebalance_counter = 0;
 	}
 
@@ -1775,21 +1755,14 @@ void bond_alb_handle_link_change(struct bonding *bond, struct slave *slave, char
  * Set the bond->curr_active_slave to @new_slave and handle
  * mac address swapping and promiscuity changes as needed.
  *
- * If new_slave is NULL, caller must hold curr_slave_lock for write
- *
- * If new_slave is not NULL, caller must hold RTNL, curr_slave_lock
- * for write.  Processing here may sleep, so no other locks may be held.
+ * Caller must hold RTNL
  */
 void bond_alb_handle_active_change(struct bonding *bond, struct slave *new_slave)
-	__releases(&bond->curr_slave_lock)
-	__acquires(&bond->curr_slave_lock)
 {
 	struct slave *swap_slave;
 	struct slave *curr_active;
 
-	curr_active = rcu_dereference_protected(bond->curr_active_slave,
-						!new_slave ||
-						lockdep_is_held(&bond->curr_slave_lock));
+	curr_active = rtnl_dereference(bond->curr_active_slave);
 	if (curr_active == new_slave)
 		return;
 
@@ -1820,10 +1793,6 @@ void bond_alb_handle_active_change(struct bonding *bond, struct slave *new_slave
 		tlb_clear_slave(bond, swap_slave, 1);
 	tlb_clear_slave(bond, new_slave, 1);
 
-	write_unlock_bh(&bond->curr_slave_lock);
-
-	ASSERT_RTNL();
-
 	/* in TLB mode, the slave might flip down/up with the old dev_addr,
 	 * and thus filter bond->dev_addr's packets, so force bond's mac
 	 */
@@ -1852,8 +1821,6 @@ void bond_alb_handle_active_change(struct bonding *bond, struct slave *new_slave
 		alb_send_learning_packets(new_slave, bond->dev->dev_addr,
 					  false);
 	}
-
-	write_lock_bh(&bond->curr_slave_lock);
 }
 
 /* Called with RTNL */
-- 
1.9.3

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [PATCH net-next v2 3/7] bonding: clean curr_slave_lock use
  2014-09-11 20:49 [PATCH net-next v2 0/7] bonding: get rid of curr_slave_lock Nikolay Aleksandrov
  2014-09-11 20:49 ` [PATCH net-next v2 1/7] bonding: 3ad: clean up curr_slave_lock usage Nikolay Aleksandrov
  2014-09-11 20:49 ` [PATCH net-next v2 2/7] bonding: alb: remove curr_slave_lock Nikolay Aleksandrov
@ 2014-09-11 20:49 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
  2014-09-11 20:49 ` [PATCH net-next v2 4/7] bonding: convert curr_slave_lock to a spinlock and rename it Nikolay Aleksandrov
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Nikolay Aleksandrov @ 2014-09-11 20:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: netdev; +Cc: vfalico, j.vosburgh, andy, davem, Nikolay Aleksandrov

Mostly all users of curr_slave_lock already have RTNL as we've discussed
previously so there's no point in using it, the one case where the lock
must stay is the 3ad code, in fact it's the only one.
It's okay to remove it from bond_do_fail_over_mac() as it's called with
RTNL and drops the curr_slave_lock anyway.
bond_change_active_slave() is one of the main places where
curr_slave_lock was used, it's okay to remove it as all callers use RTNL
these days before calling it, that's why we move the ASSERT_RTNL() in
the beginning to catch any potential offenders to this rule.
The RTNL argument actually applies to all of the places where
curr_slave_lock has been removed from in this patch.
Also remove the unnecessary bond_deref_active_protected() macro and use
rtnl_dereference() instead.

Signed-off-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@redhat.com>
---
 drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c     |  4 +--
 drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c    | 62 ++++++--------------------------------
 drivers/net/bonding/bond_options.c | 10 +-----
 drivers/net/bonding/bonding.h      |  8 +----
 4 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 70 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c
index cf4ede8594ff..b755659ddfdc 100644
--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c
+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c
@@ -451,7 +451,7 @@ static struct slave *__rlb_next_rx_slave(struct bonding *bond)
  */
 static void rlb_teach_disabled_mac_on_primary(struct bonding *bond, u8 addr[])
 {
-	struct slave *curr_active = bond_deref_active_protected(bond);
+	struct slave *curr_active = rtnl_dereference(bond->curr_active_slave);
 
 	if (!curr_active)
 		return;
@@ -512,7 +512,7 @@ static void rlb_clear_slave(struct bonding *bond, struct slave *slave)
 
 	_unlock_rx_hashtbl_bh(bond);
 
-	if (slave != bond_deref_active_protected(bond))
+	if (slave != rtnl_dereference(bond->curr_active_slave))
 		rlb_teach_disabled_mac_on_primary(bond, slave->dev->dev_addr);
 }
 
diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
index b43b2df9e5d1..3b06685260b8 100644
--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
@@ -637,13 +637,11 @@ static void bond_set_dev_addr(struct net_device *bond_dev,
  *
  * Perform special MAC address swapping for fail_over_mac settings
  *
- * Called with RTNL, curr_slave_lock for write_bh.
+ * Called with RTNL
  */
 static void bond_do_fail_over_mac(struct bonding *bond,
 				  struct slave *new_active,
 				  struct slave *old_active)
-	__releases(&bond->curr_slave_lock)
-	__acquires(&bond->curr_slave_lock)
 {
 	u8 tmp_mac[ETH_ALEN];
 	struct sockaddr saddr;
@@ -651,11 +649,8 @@ static void bond_do_fail_over_mac(struct bonding *bond,
 
 	switch (bond->params.fail_over_mac) {
 	case BOND_FOM_ACTIVE:
-		if (new_active) {
-			write_unlock_bh(&bond->curr_slave_lock);
+		if (new_active)
 			bond_set_dev_addr(bond->dev, new_active->dev);
-			write_lock_bh(&bond->curr_slave_lock);
-		}
 		break;
 	case BOND_FOM_FOLLOW:
 		/*
@@ -666,8 +661,6 @@ static void bond_do_fail_over_mac(struct bonding *bond,
 		if (!new_active)
 			return;
 
-		write_unlock_bh(&bond->curr_slave_lock);
-
 		if (old_active) {
 			ether_addr_copy(tmp_mac, new_active->dev->dev_addr);
 			ether_addr_copy(saddr.sa_data,
@@ -696,7 +689,6 @@ static void bond_do_fail_over_mac(struct bonding *bond,
 			netdev_err(bond->dev, "Error %d setting MAC of slave %s\n",
 				   -rv, new_active->dev->name);
 out:
-		write_lock_bh(&bond->curr_slave_lock);
 		break;
 	default:
 		netdev_err(bond->dev, "bond_do_fail_over_mac impossible: bad policy %d\n",
@@ -709,7 +701,7 @@ out:
 static bool bond_should_change_active(struct bonding *bond)
 {
 	struct slave *prim = rtnl_dereference(bond->primary_slave);
-	struct slave *curr = bond_deref_active_protected(bond);
+	struct slave *curr = rtnl_dereference(bond->curr_active_slave);
 
 	if (!prim || !curr || curr->link != BOND_LINK_UP)
 		return true;
@@ -785,15 +777,15 @@ static bool bond_should_notify_peers(struct bonding *bond)
  * because it is apparently the best available slave we have, even though its
  * updelay hasn't timed out yet.
  *
- * If new_active is not NULL, caller must hold curr_slave_lock for write_bh.
+ * Caller must hold RTNL.
  */
 void bond_change_active_slave(struct bonding *bond, struct slave *new_active)
 {
 	struct slave *old_active;
 
-	old_active = rcu_dereference_protected(bond->curr_active_slave,
-					       !new_active ||
-					       lockdep_is_held(&bond->curr_slave_lock));
+	ASSERT_RTNL();
+
+	old_active = rtnl_dereference(bond->curr_active_slave);
 
 	if (old_active == new_active)
 		return;
@@ -861,14 +853,10 @@ void bond_change_active_slave(struct bonding *bond, struct slave *new_active)
 					bond_should_notify_peers(bond);
 			}
 
-			write_unlock_bh(&bond->curr_slave_lock);
-
 			call_netdevice_notifiers(NETDEV_BONDING_FAILOVER, bond->dev);
 			if (should_notify_peers)
 				call_netdevice_notifiers(NETDEV_NOTIFY_PEERS,
 							 bond->dev);
-
-			write_lock_bh(&bond->curr_slave_lock);
 		}
 	}
 
@@ -893,7 +881,7 @@ void bond_change_active_slave(struct bonding *bond, struct slave *new_active)
  * - The primary_slave has got its link back.
  * - A slave has got its link back and there's no old curr_active_slave.
  *
- * Caller must hold curr_slave_lock for write_bh.
+ * Caller must hold RTNL.
  */
 void bond_select_active_slave(struct bonding *bond)
 {
@@ -901,7 +889,7 @@ void bond_select_active_slave(struct bonding *bond)
 	int rv;
 
 	best_slave = bond_find_best_slave(bond);
-	if (best_slave != bond_deref_active_protected(bond)) {
+	if (best_slave != rtnl_dereference(bond->curr_active_slave)) {
 		bond_change_active_slave(bond, best_slave);
 		rv = bond_set_carrier(bond);
 		if (!rv)
@@ -1571,9 +1559,7 @@ int bond_enslave(struct net_device *bond_dev, struct net_device *slave_dev)
 
 	if (bond_uses_primary(bond)) {
 		block_netpoll_tx();
-		write_lock_bh(&bond->curr_slave_lock);
 		bond_select_active_slave(bond);
-		write_unlock_bh(&bond->curr_slave_lock);
 		unblock_netpoll_tx();
 	}
 
@@ -1601,10 +1587,8 @@ err_detach:
 		RCU_INIT_POINTER(bond->primary_slave, NULL);
 	if (rcu_access_pointer(bond->curr_active_slave) == new_slave) {
 		block_netpoll_tx();
-		write_lock_bh(&bond->curr_slave_lock);
 		bond_change_active_slave(bond, NULL);
 		bond_select_active_slave(bond);
-		write_unlock_bh(&bond->curr_slave_lock);
 		unblock_netpoll_tx();
 	}
 	/* either primary_slave or curr_active_slave might've changed */
@@ -1720,11 +1704,8 @@ static int __bond_release_one(struct net_device *bond_dev,
 	if (rtnl_dereference(bond->primary_slave) == slave)
 		RCU_INIT_POINTER(bond->primary_slave, NULL);
 
-	if (oldcurrent == slave) {
-		write_lock_bh(&bond->curr_slave_lock);
+	if (oldcurrent == slave)
 		bond_change_active_slave(bond, NULL);
-		write_unlock_bh(&bond->curr_slave_lock);
-	}
 
 	if (bond_is_lb(bond)) {
 		/* Must be called only after the slave has been
@@ -1743,11 +1724,7 @@ static int __bond_release_one(struct net_device *bond_dev,
 		 * is no concern that another slave add/remove event
 		 * will interfere.
 		 */
-		write_lock_bh(&bond->curr_slave_lock);
-
 		bond_select_active_slave(bond);
-
-		write_unlock_bh(&bond->curr_slave_lock);
 	}
 
 	if (!bond_has_slaves(bond)) {
@@ -2058,9 +2035,7 @@ static void bond_miimon_commit(struct bonding *bond)
 do_failover:
 		ASSERT_RTNL();
 		block_netpoll_tx();
-		write_lock_bh(&bond->curr_slave_lock);
 		bond_select_active_slave(bond);
-		write_unlock_bh(&bond->curr_slave_lock);
 		unblock_netpoll_tx();
 	}
 
@@ -2506,15 +2481,8 @@ static void bond_loadbalance_arp_mon(struct work_struct *work)
 		if (slave_state_changed) {
 			bond_slave_state_change(bond);
 		} else if (do_failover) {
-			/* the bond_select_active_slave must hold RTNL
-			 * and curr_slave_lock for write.
-			 */
 			block_netpoll_tx();
-			write_lock_bh(&bond->curr_slave_lock);
-
 			bond_select_active_slave(bond);
-
-			write_unlock_bh(&bond->curr_slave_lock);
 			unblock_netpoll_tx();
 		}
 		rtnl_unlock();
@@ -2670,9 +2638,7 @@ static void bond_ab_arp_commit(struct bonding *bond)
 do_failover:
 		ASSERT_RTNL();
 		block_netpoll_tx();
-		write_lock_bh(&bond->curr_slave_lock);
 		bond_select_active_slave(bond);
-		write_unlock_bh(&bond->curr_slave_lock);
 		unblock_netpoll_tx();
 	}
 
@@ -2939,9 +2905,7 @@ static int bond_slave_netdev_event(unsigned long event,
 			    primary ? slave_dev->name : "none");
 
 		block_netpoll_tx();
-		write_lock_bh(&bond->curr_slave_lock);
 		bond_select_active_slave(bond);
-		write_unlock_bh(&bond->curr_slave_lock);
 		unblock_netpoll_tx();
 		break;
 	case NETDEV_FEAT_CHANGE:
@@ -3106,7 +3070,6 @@ static int bond_open(struct net_device *bond_dev)
 
 	/* reset slave->backup and slave->inactive */
 	if (bond_has_slaves(bond)) {
-		read_lock(&bond->curr_slave_lock);
 		bond_for_each_slave(bond, slave, iter) {
 			if (bond_uses_primary(bond) &&
 			    slave != rcu_access_pointer(bond->curr_active_slave)) {
@@ -3117,7 +3080,6 @@ static int bond_open(struct net_device *bond_dev)
 							    BOND_SLAVE_NOTIFY_NOW);
 			}
 		}
-		read_unlock(&bond->curr_slave_lock);
 	}
 
 	bond_work_init_all(bond);
@@ -3239,14 +3201,10 @@ static int bond_do_ioctl(struct net_device *bond_dev, struct ifreq *ifr, int cmd
 		if (!mii)
 			return -EINVAL;
 
-
 		if (mii->reg_num == 1) {
 			mii->val_out = 0;
-			read_lock(&bond->curr_slave_lock);
 			if (netif_carrier_ok(bond->dev))
 				mii->val_out = BMSR_LSTATUS;
-
-			read_unlock(&bond->curr_slave_lock);
 		}
 
 		return 0;
diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_options.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_options.c
index 534c0600484e..b62697f4a3de 100644
--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_options.c
+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_options.c
@@ -734,15 +734,13 @@ static int bond_option_active_slave_set(struct bonding *bond,
 	}
 
 	block_netpoll_tx();
-	write_lock_bh(&bond->curr_slave_lock);
-
 	/* check to see if we are clearing active */
 	if (!slave_dev) {
 		netdev_info(bond->dev, "Clearing current active slave\n");
 		RCU_INIT_POINTER(bond->curr_active_slave, NULL);
 		bond_select_active_slave(bond);
 	} else {
-		struct slave *old_active = bond_deref_active_protected(bond);
+		struct slave *old_active = rtnl_dereference(bond->curr_active_slave);
 		struct slave *new_active = bond_slave_get_rtnl(slave_dev);
 
 		BUG_ON(!new_active);
@@ -765,8 +763,6 @@ static int bond_option_active_slave_set(struct bonding *bond,
 			}
 		}
 	}
-
-	write_unlock_bh(&bond->curr_slave_lock);
 	unblock_netpoll_tx();
 
 	return ret;
@@ -1066,7 +1062,6 @@ static int bond_option_primary_set(struct bonding *bond,
 	struct slave *slave;
 
 	block_netpoll_tx();
-	write_lock_bh(&bond->curr_slave_lock);
 
 	p = strchr(primary, '\n');
 	if (p)
@@ -1103,7 +1098,6 @@ static int bond_option_primary_set(struct bonding *bond,
 		    primary, bond->dev->name);
 
 out:
-	write_unlock_bh(&bond->curr_slave_lock);
 	unblock_netpoll_tx();
 
 	return 0;
@@ -1117,9 +1111,7 @@ static int bond_option_primary_reselect_set(struct bonding *bond,
 	bond->params.primary_reselect = newval->value;
 
 	block_netpoll_tx();
-	write_lock_bh(&bond->curr_slave_lock);
 	bond_select_active_slave(bond);
-	write_unlock_bh(&bond->curr_slave_lock);
 	unblock_netpoll_tx();
 
 	return 0;
diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bonding.h b/drivers/net/bonding/bonding.h
index 78c461abaa09..02afdeb08765 100644
--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bonding.h
+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bonding.h
@@ -184,9 +184,7 @@ struct slave {
 
 /*
  * Here are the locking policies for the two bonding locks:
- *
- * 1) Get rcu_read_lock when reading or RTNL when writing slave list.
- * 2) Get bond->curr_slave_lock when reading/writing bond->curr_active_slave.
+ * Get rcu_read_lock when reading or RTNL when writing slave list.
  */
 struct bonding {
 	struct   net_device *dev; /* first - useful for panic debug */
@@ -227,10 +225,6 @@ struct bonding {
 #define bond_slave_get_rtnl(dev) \
 	((struct slave *) rtnl_dereference(dev->rx_handler_data))
 
-#define bond_deref_active_protected(bond)				   \
-	rcu_dereference_protected(bond->curr_active_slave,		   \
-				  lockdep_is_held(&bond->curr_slave_lock))
-
 struct bond_vlan_tag {
 	__be16		vlan_proto;
 	unsigned short	vlan_id;
-- 
1.9.3

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [PATCH net-next v2 4/7] bonding: convert curr_slave_lock to a spinlock and rename it
  2014-09-11 20:49 [PATCH net-next v2 0/7] bonding: get rid of curr_slave_lock Nikolay Aleksandrov
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2014-09-11 20:49 ` [PATCH net-next v2 3/7] bonding: clean curr_slave_lock use Nikolay Aleksandrov
@ 2014-09-11 20:49 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
  2014-09-11 20:49 ` [PATCH net-next v2 5/7] bonding: alb: convert to bond->mode_lock Nikolay Aleksandrov
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Nikolay Aleksandrov @ 2014-09-11 20:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: netdev; +Cc: vfalico, j.vosburgh, andy, davem, Nikolay Aleksandrov

curr_slave_lock is now a misleading name, a much better name is
mode_lock as it'll be used for each mode's purposes and it's no longer
necessary to use a rwlock, a simple spinlock is enough.

Suggested-by: Jay Vosburgh <jay.vosburgh@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@redhat.com>
---
 drivers/net/bonding/bond_3ad.c  | 4 ++--
 drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c | 7 +++----
 drivers/net/bonding/bonding.h   | 2 +-
 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_3ad.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_3ad.c
index dfd3a7835d17..1824d1df4d09 100644
--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_3ad.c
+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_3ad.c
@@ -2057,7 +2057,7 @@ void bond_3ad_state_machine_handler(struct work_struct *work)
 	struct port *port;
 	bool should_notify_rtnl = BOND_SLAVE_NOTIFY_LATER;
 
-	read_lock(&bond->curr_slave_lock);
+	spin_lock_bh(&bond->mode_lock);
 	rcu_read_lock();
 
 	/* check if there are any slaves */
@@ -2120,7 +2120,7 @@ re_arm:
 		}
 	}
 	rcu_read_unlock();
-	read_unlock(&bond->curr_slave_lock);
+	spin_unlock_bh(&bond->mode_lock);
 
 	if (should_notify_rtnl && rtnl_trylock()) {
 		bond_slave_state_notify(bond);
diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
index 3b06685260b8..99d21c2fd44f 100644
--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
@@ -1679,9 +1679,9 @@ static int __bond_release_one(struct net_device *bond_dev,
 		/* Sync against bond_3ad_rx_indication and
 		 * bond_3ad_state_machine_handler
 		 */
-		write_lock_bh(&bond->curr_slave_lock);
+		spin_lock_bh(&bond->mode_lock);
 		bond_3ad_unbind_slave(slave);
-		write_unlock_bh(&bond->curr_slave_lock);
+		spin_unlock_bh(&bond->mode_lock);
 	}
 
 	netdev_info(bond_dev, "Releasing %s interface %s\n",
@@ -3850,8 +3850,7 @@ void bond_setup(struct net_device *bond_dev)
 {
 	struct bonding *bond = netdev_priv(bond_dev);
 
-	/* initialize rwlocks */
-	rwlock_init(&bond->curr_slave_lock);
+	spin_lock_init(&bond->mode_lock);
 	bond->params = bonding_defaults;
 
 	/* Initialize pointers */
diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bonding.h b/drivers/net/bonding/bonding.h
index 02afdeb08765..0cda34b827f8 100644
--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bonding.h
+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bonding.h
@@ -195,7 +195,7 @@ struct bonding {
 	s32      slave_cnt; /* never change this value outside the attach/detach wrappers */
 	int     (*recv_probe)(const struct sk_buff *, struct bonding *,
 			      struct slave *);
-	rwlock_t curr_slave_lock;
+	spinlock_t mode_lock;
 	u8	 send_peer_notif;
 	u8       igmp_retrans;
 #ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS
-- 
1.9.3

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [PATCH net-next v2 5/7] bonding: alb: convert to bond->mode_lock
  2014-09-11 20:49 [PATCH net-next v2 0/7] bonding: get rid of curr_slave_lock Nikolay Aleksandrov
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2014-09-11 20:49 ` [PATCH net-next v2 4/7] bonding: convert curr_slave_lock to a spinlock and rename it Nikolay Aleksandrov
@ 2014-09-11 20:49 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
  2014-09-11 20:49 ` [PATCH net-next v2 6/7] bonding: 3ad: " Nikolay Aleksandrov
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Nikolay Aleksandrov @ 2014-09-11 20:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: netdev; +Cc: vfalico, j.vosburgh, andy, davem, Nikolay Aleksandrov

The ALB/TLB specific spinlocks are no longer necessary as we now have
bond->mode_lock for this purpose, so convert them and remove them from
struct alb_bond_info.
Also remove the unneeded lock/unlock functions and use spin_lock/unlock
directly.

Suggested-by: Jay Vosburgh <jay.vosburgh@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@redhat.com>
---
 drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c     | 108 ++++++++++++-------------------------
 drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.h     |   2 -
 drivers/net/bonding/bond_debugfs.c |   4 +-
 drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c    |  10 ----
 4 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 89 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c
index b755659ddfdc..876b97fb55e9 100644
--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c
+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c
@@ -100,27 +100,6 @@ static inline u8 _simple_hash(const u8 *hash_start, int hash_size)
 
 /*********************** tlb specific functions ***************************/
 
-static inline void _lock_tx_hashtbl_bh(struct bonding *bond)
-{
-	spin_lock_bh(&(BOND_ALB_INFO(bond).tx_hashtbl_lock));
-}
-
-static inline void _unlock_tx_hashtbl_bh(struct bonding *bond)
-{
-	spin_unlock_bh(&(BOND_ALB_INFO(bond).tx_hashtbl_lock));
-}
-
-static inline void _lock_tx_hashtbl(struct bonding *bond)
-{
-	spin_lock(&(BOND_ALB_INFO(bond).tx_hashtbl_lock));
-}
-
-static inline void _unlock_tx_hashtbl(struct bonding *bond)
-{
-	spin_unlock(&(BOND_ALB_INFO(bond).tx_hashtbl_lock));
-}
-
-/* Caller must hold tx_hashtbl lock */
 static inline void tlb_init_table_entry(struct tlb_client_info *entry, int save_load)
 {
 	if (save_load) {
@@ -167,9 +146,9 @@ static void __tlb_clear_slave(struct bonding *bond, struct slave *slave,
 static void tlb_clear_slave(struct bonding *bond, struct slave *slave,
 			 int save_load)
 {
-	_lock_tx_hashtbl_bh(bond);
+	spin_lock_bh(&bond->mode_lock);
 	__tlb_clear_slave(bond, slave, save_load);
-	_unlock_tx_hashtbl_bh(bond);
+	spin_unlock_bh(&bond->mode_lock);
 }
 
 /* Must be called before starting the monitor timer */
@@ -184,14 +163,14 @@ static int tlb_initialize(struct bonding *bond)
 	if (!new_hashtbl)
 		return -1;
 
-	_lock_tx_hashtbl_bh(bond);
+	spin_lock_bh(&bond->mode_lock);
 
 	bond_info->tx_hashtbl = new_hashtbl;
 
 	for (i = 0; i < TLB_HASH_TABLE_SIZE; i++)
 		tlb_init_table_entry(&bond_info->tx_hashtbl[i], 0);
 
-	_unlock_tx_hashtbl_bh(bond);
+	spin_unlock_bh(&bond->mode_lock);
 
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -202,12 +181,12 @@ static void tlb_deinitialize(struct bonding *bond)
 	struct alb_bond_info *bond_info = &(BOND_ALB_INFO(bond));
 	struct tlb_up_slave *arr;
 
-	_lock_tx_hashtbl_bh(bond);
+	spin_lock_bh(&bond->mode_lock);
 
 	kfree(bond_info->tx_hashtbl);
 	bond_info->tx_hashtbl = NULL;
 
-	_unlock_tx_hashtbl_bh(bond);
+	spin_unlock_bh(&bond->mode_lock);
 
 	arr = rtnl_dereference(bond_info->slave_arr);
 	if (arr)
@@ -281,7 +260,6 @@ static struct slave *__tlb_choose_channel(struct bonding *bond, u32 hash_index,
 	return assigned_slave;
 }
 
-/* Caller must hold bond lock for read */
 static struct slave *tlb_choose_channel(struct bonding *bond, u32 hash_index,
 					u32 skb_len)
 {
@@ -291,32 +269,13 @@ static struct slave *tlb_choose_channel(struct bonding *bond, u32 hash_index,
 	 * tlb_choose_channel() is only called by bond_alb_xmit()
 	 * which already has softirq disabled.
 	 */
-	_lock_tx_hashtbl(bond);
+	spin_lock(&bond->mode_lock);
 	tx_slave = __tlb_choose_channel(bond, hash_index, skb_len);
-	_unlock_tx_hashtbl(bond);
+	spin_unlock(&bond->mode_lock);
 	return tx_slave;
 }
 
 /*********************** rlb specific functions ***************************/
-static inline void _lock_rx_hashtbl_bh(struct bonding *bond)
-{
-	spin_lock_bh(&(BOND_ALB_INFO(bond).rx_hashtbl_lock));
-}
-
-static inline void _unlock_rx_hashtbl_bh(struct bonding *bond)
-{
-	spin_unlock_bh(&(BOND_ALB_INFO(bond).rx_hashtbl_lock));
-}
-
-static inline void _lock_rx_hashtbl(struct bonding *bond)
-{
-	spin_lock(&(BOND_ALB_INFO(bond).rx_hashtbl_lock));
-}
-
-static inline void _unlock_rx_hashtbl(struct bonding *bond)
-{
-	spin_unlock(&(BOND_ALB_INFO(bond).rx_hashtbl_lock));
-}
 
 /* when an ARP REPLY is received from a client update its info
  * in the rx_hashtbl
@@ -327,7 +286,7 @@ static void rlb_update_entry_from_arp(struct bonding *bond, struct arp_pkt *arp)
 	struct rlb_client_info *client_info;
 	u32 hash_index;
 
-	_lock_rx_hashtbl_bh(bond);
+	spin_lock_bh(&bond->mode_lock);
 
 	hash_index = _simple_hash((u8 *)&(arp->ip_src), sizeof(arp->ip_src));
 	client_info = &(bond_info->rx_hashtbl[hash_index]);
@@ -342,7 +301,7 @@ static void rlb_update_entry_from_arp(struct bonding *bond, struct arp_pkt *arp)
 		bond_info->rx_ntt = 1;
 	}
 
-	_unlock_rx_hashtbl_bh(bond);
+	spin_unlock_bh(&bond->mode_lock);
 }
 
 static int rlb_arp_recv(const struct sk_buff *skb, struct bonding *bond,
@@ -479,7 +438,7 @@ static void rlb_clear_slave(struct bonding *bond, struct slave *slave)
 	u32 index, next_index;
 
 	/* clear slave from rx_hashtbl */
-	_lock_rx_hashtbl_bh(bond);
+	spin_lock_bh(&bond->mode_lock);
 
 	rx_hash_table = bond_info->rx_hashtbl;
 	index = bond_info->rx_hashtbl_used_head;
@@ -510,7 +469,7 @@ static void rlb_clear_slave(struct bonding *bond, struct slave *slave)
 		}
 	}
 
-	_unlock_rx_hashtbl_bh(bond);
+	spin_unlock_bh(&bond->mode_lock);
 
 	if (slave != rtnl_dereference(bond->curr_active_slave))
 		rlb_teach_disabled_mac_on_primary(bond, slave->dev->dev_addr);
@@ -561,7 +520,7 @@ static void rlb_update_rx_clients(struct bonding *bond)
 	struct rlb_client_info *client_info;
 	u32 hash_index;
 
-	_lock_rx_hashtbl_bh(bond);
+	spin_lock_bh(&bond->mode_lock);
 
 	hash_index = bond_info->rx_hashtbl_used_head;
 	for (; hash_index != RLB_NULL_INDEX;
@@ -579,7 +538,7 @@ static void rlb_update_rx_clients(struct bonding *bond)
 	 */
 	bond_info->rlb_update_delay_counter = RLB_UPDATE_DELAY;
 
-	_unlock_rx_hashtbl_bh(bond);
+	spin_unlock_bh(&bond->mode_lock);
 }
 
 /* The slave was assigned a new mac address - update the clients */
@@ -590,7 +549,7 @@ static void rlb_req_update_slave_clients(struct bonding *bond, struct slave *sla
 	int ntt = 0;
 	u32 hash_index;
 
-	_lock_rx_hashtbl_bh(bond);
+	spin_lock_bh(&bond->mode_lock);
 
 	hash_index = bond_info->rx_hashtbl_used_head;
 	for (; hash_index != RLB_NULL_INDEX;
@@ -611,7 +570,7 @@ static void rlb_req_update_slave_clients(struct bonding *bond, struct slave *sla
 		bond_info->rlb_update_retry_counter = RLB_UPDATE_RETRY;
 	}
 
-	_unlock_rx_hashtbl_bh(bond);
+	spin_unlock_bh(&bond->mode_lock);
 }
 
 /* mark all clients using src_ip to be updated */
@@ -621,7 +580,7 @@ static void rlb_req_update_subnet_clients(struct bonding *bond, __be32 src_ip)
 	struct rlb_client_info *client_info;
 	u32 hash_index;
 
-	_lock_rx_hashtbl(bond);
+	spin_lock(&bond->mode_lock);
 
 	hash_index = bond_info->rx_hashtbl_used_head;
 	for (; hash_index != RLB_NULL_INDEX;
@@ -645,10 +604,9 @@ static void rlb_req_update_subnet_clients(struct bonding *bond, __be32 src_ip)
 		}
 	}
 
-	_unlock_rx_hashtbl(bond);
+	spin_unlock(&bond->mode_lock);
 }
 
-/* Caller must hold both bond and ptr locks for read */
 static struct slave *rlb_choose_channel(struct sk_buff *skb, struct bonding *bond)
 {
 	struct alb_bond_info *bond_info = &(BOND_ALB_INFO(bond));
@@ -657,7 +615,7 @@ static struct slave *rlb_choose_channel(struct sk_buff *skb, struct bonding *bon
 	struct rlb_client_info *client_info;
 	u32 hash_index = 0;
 
-	_lock_rx_hashtbl(bond);
+	spin_lock(&bond->mode_lock);
 
 	curr_active_slave = rcu_dereference(bond->curr_active_slave);
 
@@ -676,7 +634,7 @@ static struct slave *rlb_choose_channel(struct sk_buff *skb, struct bonding *bon
 
 			assigned_slave = client_info->slave;
 			if (assigned_slave) {
-				_unlock_rx_hashtbl(bond);
+				spin_unlock(&bond->mode_lock);
 				return assigned_slave;
 			}
 		} else {
@@ -738,7 +696,7 @@ static struct slave *rlb_choose_channel(struct sk_buff *skb, struct bonding *bon
 		}
 	}
 
-	_unlock_rx_hashtbl(bond);
+	spin_unlock(&bond->mode_lock);
 
 	return assigned_slave;
 }
@@ -800,7 +758,7 @@ static void rlb_rebalance(struct bonding *bond)
 	int ntt;
 	u32 hash_index;
 
-	_lock_rx_hashtbl_bh(bond);
+	spin_lock_bh(&bond->mode_lock);
 
 	ntt = 0;
 	hash_index = bond_info->rx_hashtbl_used_head;
@@ -818,7 +776,7 @@ static void rlb_rebalance(struct bonding *bond)
 	/* update the team's flag only after the whole iteration */
 	if (ntt)
 		bond_info->rx_ntt = 1;
-	_unlock_rx_hashtbl_bh(bond);
+	spin_unlock_bh(&bond->mode_lock);
 }
 
 /* Caller must hold rx_hashtbl lock */
@@ -917,7 +875,7 @@ static void rlb_purge_src_ip(struct bonding *bond, struct arp_pkt *arp)
 	u32 ip_src_hash = _simple_hash((u8 *)&(arp->ip_src), sizeof(arp->ip_src));
 	u32 index;
 
-	_lock_rx_hashtbl_bh(bond);
+	spin_lock_bh(&bond->mode_lock);
 
 	index = bond_info->rx_hashtbl[ip_src_hash].src_first;
 	while (index != RLB_NULL_INDEX) {
@@ -928,7 +886,7 @@ static void rlb_purge_src_ip(struct bonding *bond, struct arp_pkt *arp)
 				rlb_delete_table_entry(bond, index);
 		index = next_index;
 	}
-	_unlock_rx_hashtbl_bh(bond);
+	spin_unlock_bh(&bond->mode_lock);
 }
 
 static int rlb_initialize(struct bonding *bond)
@@ -942,7 +900,7 @@ static int rlb_initialize(struct bonding *bond)
 	if (!new_hashtbl)
 		return -1;
 
-	_lock_rx_hashtbl_bh(bond);
+	spin_lock_bh(&bond->mode_lock);
 
 	bond_info->rx_hashtbl = new_hashtbl;
 
@@ -951,7 +909,7 @@ static int rlb_initialize(struct bonding *bond)
 	for (i = 0; i < RLB_HASH_TABLE_SIZE; i++)
 		rlb_init_table_entry(bond_info->rx_hashtbl + i);
 
-	_unlock_rx_hashtbl_bh(bond);
+	spin_unlock_bh(&bond->mode_lock);
 
 	/* register to receive ARPs */
 	bond->recv_probe = rlb_arp_recv;
@@ -963,13 +921,13 @@ static void rlb_deinitialize(struct bonding *bond)
 {
 	struct alb_bond_info *bond_info = &(BOND_ALB_INFO(bond));
 
-	_lock_rx_hashtbl_bh(bond);
+	spin_lock_bh(&bond->mode_lock);
 
 	kfree(bond_info->rx_hashtbl);
 	bond_info->rx_hashtbl = NULL;
 	bond_info->rx_hashtbl_used_head = RLB_NULL_INDEX;
 
-	_unlock_rx_hashtbl_bh(bond);
+	spin_unlock_bh(&bond->mode_lock);
 }
 
 static void rlb_clear_vlan(struct bonding *bond, unsigned short vlan_id)
@@ -977,7 +935,7 @@ static void rlb_clear_vlan(struct bonding *bond, unsigned short vlan_id)
 	struct alb_bond_info *bond_info = &(BOND_ALB_INFO(bond));
 	u32 curr_index;
 
-	_lock_rx_hashtbl_bh(bond);
+	spin_lock_bh(&bond->mode_lock);
 
 	curr_index = bond_info->rx_hashtbl_used_head;
 	while (curr_index != RLB_NULL_INDEX) {
@@ -990,7 +948,7 @@ static void rlb_clear_vlan(struct bonding *bond, unsigned short vlan_id)
 		curr_index = next_index;
 	}
 
-	_unlock_rx_hashtbl_bh(bond);
+	spin_unlock_bh(&bond->mode_lock);
 }
 
 /*********************** tlb/rlb shared functions *********************/
@@ -1394,9 +1352,9 @@ static int bond_do_alb_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct bonding *bond,
 	}
 
 	if (tx_slave && bond->params.tlb_dynamic_lb) {
-		_lock_tx_hashtbl(bond);
+		spin_lock(&bond->mode_lock);
 		__tlb_clear_slave(bond, tx_slave, 0);
-		_unlock_tx_hashtbl(bond);
+		spin_unlock(&bond->mode_lock);
 	}
 
 	/* no suitable interface, frame not sent */
diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.h b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.h
index aaeac61d03cf..3c6a7ff974d7 100644
--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.h
+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.h
@@ -147,7 +147,6 @@ struct tlb_up_slave {
 
 struct alb_bond_info {
 	struct tlb_client_info	*tx_hashtbl; /* Dynamically allocated */
-	spinlock_t		tx_hashtbl_lock;
 	u32			unbalanced_load;
 	int			tx_rebalance_counter;
 	int			lp_counter;
@@ -156,7 +155,6 @@ struct alb_bond_info {
 	/* -------- rlb parameters -------- */
 	int rlb_enabled;
 	struct rlb_client_info	*rx_hashtbl;	/* Receive hash table */
-	spinlock_t		rx_hashtbl_lock;
 	u32			rx_hashtbl_used_head;
 	u8			rx_ntt;	/* flag - need to transmit
 					 * to all rx clients
diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_debugfs.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_debugfs.c
index 280971b227ea..652f6c5d1bf7 100644
--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_debugfs.c
+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_debugfs.c
@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ static int bond_debug_rlb_hash_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
 	seq_printf(m, "SourceIP        DestinationIP   "
 			"Destination MAC   DEV\n");
 
-	spin_lock_bh(&(BOND_ALB_INFO(bond).rx_hashtbl_lock));
+	spin_lock_bh(&bond->mode_lock);
 
 	hash_index = bond_info->rx_hashtbl_used_head;
 	for (; hash_index != RLB_NULL_INDEX;
@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ static int bond_debug_rlb_hash_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
 			client_info->slave->dev->name);
 	}
 
-	spin_unlock_bh(&(BOND_ALB_INFO(bond).rx_hashtbl_lock));
+	spin_unlock_bh(&bond->mode_lock);
 
 	return 0;
 }
diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
index 99d21c2fd44f..e06251417a7d 100644
--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
@@ -4297,19 +4297,9 @@ static int bond_init(struct net_device *bond_dev)
 {
 	struct bonding *bond = netdev_priv(bond_dev);
 	struct bond_net *bn = net_generic(dev_net(bond_dev), bond_net_id);
-	struct alb_bond_info *bond_info = &(BOND_ALB_INFO(bond));
 
 	netdev_dbg(bond_dev, "Begin bond_init\n");
 
-	/*
-	 * Initialize locks that may be required during
-	 * en/deslave operations.  All of the bond_open work
-	 * (of which this is part) should really be moved to
-	 * a phase prior to dev_open
-	 */
-	spin_lock_init(&(bond_info->tx_hashtbl_lock));
-	spin_lock_init(&(bond_info->rx_hashtbl_lock));
-
 	bond->wq = create_singlethread_workqueue(bond_dev->name);
 	if (!bond->wq)
 		return -ENOMEM;
-- 
1.9.3

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [PATCH net-next v2 6/7] bonding: 3ad: convert to bond->mode_lock
  2014-09-11 20:49 [PATCH net-next v2 0/7] bonding: get rid of curr_slave_lock Nikolay Aleksandrov
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2014-09-11 20:49 ` [PATCH net-next v2 5/7] bonding: alb: convert to bond->mode_lock Nikolay Aleksandrov
@ 2014-09-11 20:49 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
  2014-09-11 20:49 ` [PATCH net-next v2 7/7] bonding: adjust locking comments Nikolay Aleksandrov
  2014-09-13 20:30 ` [PATCH net-next v2 0/7] bonding: get rid of curr_slave_lock David Miller
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Nikolay Aleksandrov @ 2014-09-11 20:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: netdev; +Cc: vfalico, j.vosburgh, andy, davem, Nikolay Aleksandrov

Now that we have bond->mode_lock, we can remove the state_machine_lock
and use it in its place. There're no fast paths requiring the per-port
spinlocks so it should be okay to consolidate them into mode_lock.
Also move it inside the unbinding function as we don't want to expose
mode_lock outside of the specific modes.

Suggested-by: Jay Vosburgh <jay.vosburgh@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@redhat.com>
---
v2: remove the extra state machine locking in bond_3ad_state_machine_handler
    as now mode_lock is used while the whole function is executing.

 drivers/net/bonding/bond_3ad.c  | 70 +++++++++++++----------------------------
 drivers/net/bonding/bond_3ad.h  |  1 -
 drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c |  8 +----
 3 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 57 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_3ad.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_3ad.c
index 1824d1df4d09..2bb360f32a64 100644
--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_3ad.c
+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_3ad.c
@@ -234,24 +234,6 @@ static inline int __check_agg_selection_timer(struct port *port)
 }
 
 /**
- * __get_state_machine_lock - lock the port's state machines
- * @port: the port we're looking at
- */
-static inline void __get_state_machine_lock(struct port *port)
-{
-	spin_lock_bh(&(SLAVE_AD_INFO(port->slave)->state_machine_lock));
-}
-
-/**
- * __release_state_machine_lock - unlock the port's state machines
- * @port: the port we're looking at
- */
-static inline void __release_state_machine_lock(struct port *port)
-{
-	spin_unlock_bh(&(SLAVE_AD_INFO(port->slave)->state_machine_lock));
-}
-
-/**
  * __get_link_speed - get a port's speed
  * @port: the port we're looking at
  *
@@ -341,16 +323,6 @@ static u8 __get_duplex(struct port *port)
 	return retval;
 }
 
-/**
- * __initialize_port_locks - initialize a port's STATE machine spinlock
- * @port: the slave of the port we're looking at
- */
-static inline void __initialize_port_locks(struct slave *slave)
-{
-	/* make sure it isn't called twice */
-	spin_lock_init(&(SLAVE_AD_INFO(slave)->state_machine_lock));
-}
-
 /* Conversions */
 
 /**
@@ -1843,7 +1815,6 @@ void bond_3ad_bind_slave(struct slave *slave)
 
 		ad_initialize_port(port, bond->params.lacp_fast);
 
-		__initialize_port_locks(slave);
 		port->slave = slave;
 		port->actor_port_number = SLAVE_AD_INFO(slave)->id;
 		/* key is determined according to the link speed, duplex and user key(which
@@ -1899,6 +1870,8 @@ void bond_3ad_unbind_slave(struct slave *slave)
 	struct slave *slave_iter;
 	struct list_head *iter;
 
+	/* Sync against bond_3ad_state_machine_handler() */
+	spin_lock_bh(&bond->mode_lock);
 	aggregator = &(SLAVE_AD_INFO(slave)->aggregator);
 	port = &(SLAVE_AD_INFO(slave)->port);
 
@@ -1906,7 +1879,7 @@ void bond_3ad_unbind_slave(struct slave *slave)
 	if (!port->slave) {
 		netdev_warn(bond->dev, "Trying to unbind an uninitialized port on %s\n",
 			    slave->dev->name);
-		return;
+		goto out;
 	}
 
 	netdev_dbg(bond->dev, "Unbinding Link Aggregation Group %d\n",
@@ -2032,6 +2005,9 @@ void bond_3ad_unbind_slave(struct slave *slave)
 		}
 	}
 	port->slave = NULL;
+
+out:
+	spin_unlock_bh(&bond->mode_lock);
 }
 
 /**
@@ -2057,6 +2033,10 @@ void bond_3ad_state_machine_handler(struct work_struct *work)
 	struct port *port;
 	bool should_notify_rtnl = BOND_SLAVE_NOTIFY_LATER;
 
+	/* Lock to protect data accessed by all (e.g., port->sm_vars) and
+	 * against running with bond_3ad_unbind_slave. ad_rx_machine may run
+	 * concurrently due to incoming LACPDU as well.
+	 */
 	spin_lock_bh(&bond->mode_lock);
 	rcu_read_lock();
 
@@ -2093,12 +2073,6 @@ void bond_3ad_state_machine_handler(struct work_struct *work)
 			goto re_arm;
 		}
 
-		/* Lock around state machines to protect data accessed
-		 * by all (e.g., port->sm_vars).  ad_rx_machine may run
-		 * concurrently due to incoming LACPDU.
-		 */
-		__get_state_machine_lock(port);
-
 		ad_rx_machine(NULL, port);
 		ad_periodic_machine(port);
 		ad_port_selection_logic(port);
@@ -2108,8 +2082,6 @@ void bond_3ad_state_machine_handler(struct work_struct *work)
 		/* turn off the BEGIN bit, since we already handled it */
 		if (port->sm_vars & AD_PORT_BEGIN)
 			port->sm_vars &= ~AD_PORT_BEGIN;
-
-		__release_state_machine_lock(port);
 	}
 
 re_arm:
@@ -2161,9 +2133,9 @@ static int bond_3ad_rx_indication(struct lacpdu *lacpdu, struct slave *slave,
 			netdev_dbg(slave->bond->dev, "Received LACPDU on port %d\n",
 				   port->actor_port_number);
 			/* Protect against concurrent state machines */
-			__get_state_machine_lock(port);
+			spin_lock(&slave->bond->mode_lock);
 			ad_rx_machine(lacpdu, port);
-			__release_state_machine_lock(port);
+			spin_unlock(&slave->bond->mode_lock);
 			break;
 
 		case AD_TYPE_MARKER:
@@ -2213,7 +2185,7 @@ void bond_3ad_adapter_speed_changed(struct slave *slave)
 		return;
 	}
 
-	__get_state_machine_lock(port);
+	spin_lock_bh(&slave->bond->mode_lock);
 
 	port->actor_admin_port_key &= ~AD_SPEED_KEY_BITS;
 	port->actor_oper_port_key = port->actor_admin_port_key |=
@@ -2224,7 +2196,7 @@ void bond_3ad_adapter_speed_changed(struct slave *slave)
 	 */
 	port->sm_vars |= AD_PORT_BEGIN;
 
-	__release_state_machine_lock(port);
+	spin_unlock_bh(&slave->bond->mode_lock);
 }
 
 /**
@@ -2246,7 +2218,7 @@ void bond_3ad_adapter_duplex_changed(struct slave *slave)
 		return;
 	}
 
-	__get_state_machine_lock(port);
+	spin_lock_bh(&slave->bond->mode_lock);
 
 	port->actor_admin_port_key &= ~AD_DUPLEX_KEY_BITS;
 	port->actor_oper_port_key = port->actor_admin_port_key |=
@@ -2257,7 +2229,7 @@ void bond_3ad_adapter_duplex_changed(struct slave *slave)
 	 */
 	port->sm_vars |= AD_PORT_BEGIN;
 
-	__release_state_machine_lock(port);
+	spin_unlock_bh(&slave->bond->mode_lock);
 }
 
 /**
@@ -2280,7 +2252,7 @@ void bond_3ad_handle_link_change(struct slave *slave, char link)
 		return;
 	}
 
-	__get_state_machine_lock(port);
+	spin_lock_bh(&slave->bond->mode_lock);
 	/* on link down we are zeroing duplex and speed since
 	 * some of the adaptors(ce1000.lan) report full duplex/speed
 	 * instead of N/A(duplex) / 0(speed).
@@ -2311,7 +2283,7 @@ void bond_3ad_handle_link_change(struct slave *slave, char link)
 	 */
 	port->sm_vars |= AD_PORT_BEGIN;
 
-	__release_state_machine_lock(port);
+	spin_unlock_bh(&slave->bond->mode_lock);
 }
 
 /**
@@ -2495,7 +2467,7 @@ int bond_3ad_lacpdu_recv(const struct sk_buff *skb, struct bonding *bond,
  * When modify lacp_rate parameter via sysfs,
  * update actor_oper_port_state of each port.
  *
- * Hold slave->state_machine_lock,
+ * Hold bond->mode_lock,
  * so we can modify port->actor_oper_port_state,
  * no matter bond is up or down.
  */
@@ -2507,13 +2479,13 @@ void bond_3ad_update_lacp_rate(struct bonding *bond)
 	int lacp_fast;
 
 	lacp_fast = bond->params.lacp_fast;
+	spin_lock_bh(&bond->mode_lock);
 	bond_for_each_slave(bond, slave, iter) {
 		port = &(SLAVE_AD_INFO(slave)->port);
-		__get_state_machine_lock(port);
 		if (lacp_fast)
 			port->actor_oper_port_state |= AD_STATE_LACP_TIMEOUT;
 		else
 			port->actor_oper_port_state &= ~AD_STATE_LACP_TIMEOUT;
-		__release_state_machine_lock(port);
 	}
+	spin_unlock_bh(&bond->mode_lock);
 }
diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_3ad.h b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_3ad.h
index bb03b1df2f3e..c5f14ac63f3e 100644
--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_3ad.h
+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_3ad.h
@@ -259,7 +259,6 @@ struct ad_bond_info {
 struct ad_slave_info {
 	struct aggregator aggregator;	/* 802.3ad aggregator structure */
 	struct port port;		/* 802.3ad port structure */
-	spinlock_t state_machine_lock;	/* mutex state machines vs. incoming LACPDU */
 	u16 id;
 };
 
diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
index e06251417a7d..116cf6965bc5 100644
--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
@@ -1675,14 +1675,8 @@ static int __bond_release_one(struct net_device *bond_dev,
 	 */
 	netdev_rx_handler_unregister(slave_dev);
 
-	if (BOND_MODE(bond) == BOND_MODE_8023AD) {
-		/* Sync against bond_3ad_rx_indication and
-		 * bond_3ad_state_machine_handler
-		 */
-		spin_lock_bh(&bond->mode_lock);
+	if (BOND_MODE(bond) == BOND_MODE_8023AD)
 		bond_3ad_unbind_slave(slave);
-		spin_unlock_bh(&bond->mode_lock);
-	}
 
 	netdev_info(bond_dev, "Releasing %s interface %s\n",
 		    bond_is_active_slave(slave) ? "active" : "backup",
-- 
1.9.3

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [PATCH net-next v2 7/7] bonding: adjust locking comments
  2014-09-11 20:49 [PATCH net-next v2 0/7] bonding: get rid of curr_slave_lock Nikolay Aleksandrov
                   ` (5 preceding siblings ...)
  2014-09-11 20:49 ` [PATCH net-next v2 6/7] bonding: 3ad: " Nikolay Aleksandrov
@ 2014-09-11 20:49 ` Nikolay Aleksandrov
  2014-09-13 20:30 ` [PATCH net-next v2 0/7] bonding: get rid of curr_slave_lock David Miller
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Nikolay Aleksandrov @ 2014-09-11 20:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: netdev; +Cc: vfalico, j.vosburgh, andy, davem, Nikolay Aleksandrov

Now that locks have been removed, remove some unnecessary comments and
adjust others to reflect reality. Also add a comment to "mode_lock" to
describe its current users and give a brief summary why they need it.

Signed-off-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@redhat.com>
---
 drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c  | 8 +-------
 drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c | 6 +++---
 drivers/net/bonding/bonding.h   | 6 ++++++
 3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c
index 876b97fb55e9..85af961f1317 100644
--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c
+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_alb.c
@@ -119,7 +119,6 @@ static inline void tlb_init_slave(struct slave *slave)
 	SLAVE_TLB_INFO(slave).head = TLB_NULL_INDEX;
 }
 
-/* Caller must hold bond lock for read, BH disabled */
 static void __tlb_clear_slave(struct bonding *bond, struct slave *slave,
 			 int save_load)
 {
@@ -142,7 +141,6 @@ static void __tlb_clear_slave(struct bonding *bond, struct slave *slave,
 	tlb_init_slave(slave);
 }
 
-/* Caller must hold bond lock for read */
 static void tlb_clear_slave(struct bonding *bond, struct slave *slave,
 			 int save_load)
 {
@@ -199,7 +197,6 @@ static long long compute_gap(struct slave *slave)
 	       (s64) (SLAVE_TLB_INFO(slave).load << 3); /* Bytes to bits */
 }
 
-/* Caller must hold bond lock for read */
 static struct slave *tlb_get_least_loaded_slave(struct bonding *bond)
 {
 	struct slave *slave, *least_loaded;
@@ -337,7 +334,6 @@ out:
 	return RX_HANDLER_ANOTHER;
 }
 
-/* Caller must hold bond lock for read */
 static struct slave *rlb_next_rx_slave(struct bonding *bond)
 {
 	struct alb_bond_info *bond_info = &(BOND_ALB_INFO(bond));
@@ -370,7 +366,7 @@ static struct slave *rlb_next_rx_slave(struct bonding *bond)
 	return rx_slave;
 }
 
-/* Caller must hold rcu_read_lock() for read */
+/* Caller must hold rcu_read_lock() */
 static struct slave *__rlb_next_rx_slave(struct bonding *bond)
 {
 	struct alb_bond_info *bond_info = &(BOND_ALB_INFO(bond));
@@ -749,7 +745,6 @@ static struct slave *rlb_arp_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct bonding *bond)
 	return tx_slave;
 }
 
-/* Caller must hold bond lock for read */
 static void rlb_rebalance(struct bonding *bond)
 {
 	struct alb_bond_info *bond_info = &(BOND_ALB_INFO(bond));
@@ -1677,7 +1672,6 @@ void bond_alb_deinit_slave(struct bonding *bond, struct slave *slave)
 
 }
 
-/* Caller must hold bond lock for read */
 void bond_alb_handle_link_change(struct bonding *bond, struct slave *slave, char link)
 {
 	struct alb_bond_info *bond_info = &(BOND_ALB_INFO(bond));
diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
index 116cf6965bc5..2d90a8b7f62e 100644
--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
@@ -1629,7 +1629,7 @@ err_undo_flags:
 /*
  * Try to release the slave device <slave> from the bond device <master>
  * It is legal to access curr_active_slave without a lock because all the function
- * is write-locked. If "all" is true it means that the function is being called
+ * is RTNL-locked. If "all" is true it means that the function is being called
  * while destroying a bond interface and all slaves are being released.
  *
  * The rules for slave state should be:
@@ -2494,7 +2494,7 @@ re_arm:
  * place for the slave.  Returns 0 if no changes are found, >0 if changes
  * to link states must be committed.
  *
- * Called with rcu_read_lock hold.
+ * Called with rcu_read_lock held.
  */
 static int bond_ab_arp_inspect(struct bonding *bond)
 {
@@ -2642,7 +2642,7 @@ do_failover:
 /*
  * Send ARP probes for active-backup mode ARP monitor.
  *
- * Called with rcu_read_lock hold.
+ * Called with rcu_read_lock held.
  */
 static bool bond_ab_arp_probe(struct bonding *bond)
 {
diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bonding.h b/drivers/net/bonding/bonding.h
index 0cda34b827f8..3aff1a815e89 100644
--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bonding.h
+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bonding.h
@@ -195,6 +195,12 @@ struct bonding {
 	s32      slave_cnt; /* never change this value outside the attach/detach wrappers */
 	int     (*recv_probe)(const struct sk_buff *, struct bonding *,
 			      struct slave *);
+	/* mode_lock is used for mode-specific locking needs, currently used by:
+	 * 3ad mode (4) - protect against running bond_3ad_unbind_slave() and
+	 *                bond_3ad_state_machine_handler() concurrently.
+	 * TLB mode (5) - to sync the use and modifications of its hash table
+	 * ALB mode (6) - to sync the use and modifications of its hash table
+	 */
 	spinlock_t mode_lock;
 	u8	 send_peer_notif;
 	u8       igmp_retrans;
-- 
1.9.3

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH net-next v2 0/7] bonding: get rid of curr_slave_lock
  2014-09-11 20:49 [PATCH net-next v2 0/7] bonding: get rid of curr_slave_lock Nikolay Aleksandrov
                   ` (6 preceding siblings ...)
  2014-09-11 20:49 ` [PATCH net-next v2 7/7] bonding: adjust locking comments Nikolay Aleksandrov
@ 2014-09-13 20:30 ` David Miller
  7 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: David Miller @ 2014-09-13 20:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: nikolay; +Cc: netdev, vfalico, j.vosburgh, andy

From: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 22:49:21 +0200

> This is the second patch-set dealing with bond locking and the purpose here
> is to convert curr_slave_lock into a spinlock called "mode_lock" which can
> be used in the various modes for their specific needs. The first three
> patches cleanup the use of curr_slave_lock and prepare it for the
> conversion which is done in patch 4 and then the modes that were using
> their own locks are converted to use the new "mode_lock" giving us the
> opportunity to remove their locks.
> This patch-set has been tested in each mode by running enslave/release of
> slaves in parallel with traffic transmission and miimon=1 i.e. running
> all the time. In fact this lead to the discovery of a subtle bug related to
> RCU which will be fixed in -net.
> Also did an allmodconfig test just in case :-)

:-)

> v2: fix bond_3ad_state_machine_handler's use of mode_lock and
>     curr_slave_lock

Series applied, thanks.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2014-09-13 20:30 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-09-11 20:49 [PATCH net-next v2 0/7] bonding: get rid of curr_slave_lock Nikolay Aleksandrov
2014-09-11 20:49 ` [PATCH net-next v2 1/7] bonding: 3ad: clean up curr_slave_lock usage Nikolay Aleksandrov
2014-09-11 20:49 ` [PATCH net-next v2 2/7] bonding: alb: remove curr_slave_lock Nikolay Aleksandrov
2014-09-11 20:49 ` [PATCH net-next v2 3/7] bonding: clean curr_slave_lock use Nikolay Aleksandrov
2014-09-11 20:49 ` [PATCH net-next v2 4/7] bonding: convert curr_slave_lock to a spinlock and rename it Nikolay Aleksandrov
2014-09-11 20:49 ` [PATCH net-next v2 5/7] bonding: alb: convert to bond->mode_lock Nikolay Aleksandrov
2014-09-11 20:49 ` [PATCH net-next v2 6/7] bonding: 3ad: " Nikolay Aleksandrov
2014-09-11 20:49 ` [PATCH net-next v2 7/7] bonding: adjust locking comments Nikolay Aleksandrov
2014-09-13 20:30 ` [PATCH net-next v2 0/7] bonding: get rid of curr_slave_lock David Miller

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.