* [PATCH for-4.5 v9 04/19] xen: Relocate p2m_mem_access_resume to mem_access common
@ 2014-09-24 9:09 Tamas K Lengyel
2014-09-24 9:09 ` [PATCH for-4.5 v9 06/19] xen: Relocate mem_event_op domctl and access_op memop into common Tamas K Lengyel
2014-09-24 12:19 ` [PATCH for-4.5 v9 04/19] xen: Relocate p2m_mem_access_resume to mem_access common Jan Beulich
0 siblings, 2 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Tamas K Lengyel @ 2014-09-24 9:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: xen-devel; +Cc: stefano.stabellini, keir, Tamas K Lengyel, jbeulich
Relocate p2m_mem_access_resume to common and abstract the new
p2m_mem_event_emulate_check into the p2m layer to.
Signed-off-by: Tamas K Lengyel <tklengyel@sec.in.tum.de>
---
v9: Pass the vcpu instead of the domain to emulate_check.
v8: Abstract p2m_mem_event_emulate_check.
v6: Keep the comment describing the function.
v5: Style fix.
---
xen/arch/x86/mm/p2m.c | 128 ++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
xen/common/mem_access.c | 28 +++++++++-
xen/common/mem_event.c | 2 +-
xen/include/asm-arm/p2m.h | 7 +++
xen/include/asm-x86/p2m.h | 7 ++-
xen/include/xen/mem_access.h | 5 ++
6 files changed, 99 insertions(+), 78 deletions(-)
diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/mm/p2m.c b/xen/arch/x86/mm/p2m.c
index 31d0d9e..08adaac 100644
--- a/xen/arch/x86/mm/p2m.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/mm/p2m.c
@@ -1382,6 +1382,60 @@ static void p2m_mem_event_fill_regs(mem_event_request_t *req)
req->x86_regs.cs_arbytes = seg.attr.bytes;
}
+void p2m_mem_event_emulate_check(struct vcpu *v, const mem_event_response_t *rsp)
+{
+ /* Mark vcpu for skipping one instruction upon rescheduling. */
+ if ( rsp->flags & MEM_EVENT_FLAG_EMULATE )
+ {
+ struct domain *d = v->domain;
+ xenmem_access_t access;
+ bool_t violation = 1;
+
+ if ( p2m_get_mem_access(d, rsp->gfn, &access) == 0 )
+ {
+ switch ( access )
+ {
+ case XENMEM_access_n:
+ case XENMEM_access_n2rwx:
+ default:
+ violation = rsp->access_r || rsp->access_w || rsp->access_x;
+ break;
+
+ case XENMEM_access_r:
+ violation = rsp->access_w || rsp->access_x;
+ break;
+
+ case XENMEM_access_w:
+ violation = rsp->access_r || rsp->access_x;
+ break;
+
+ case XENMEM_access_x:
+ violation = rsp->access_r || rsp->access_w;
+ break;
+
+ case XENMEM_access_rx:
+ case XENMEM_access_rx2rw:
+ violation = rsp->access_w;
+ break;
+
+ case XENMEM_access_wx:
+ violation = rsp->access_r;
+ break;
+
+ case XENMEM_access_rw:
+ violation = rsp->access_x;
+ break;
+
+ case XENMEM_access_rwx:
+ violation = 0;
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+
+ v->arch.mem_event.emulate_flags = violation ? rsp->flags : 0;
+ }
+}
+
bool_t p2m_mem_access_check(paddr_t gpa, unsigned long gla,
struct npfec npfec,
mem_event_request_t **req_ptr)
@@ -1509,80 +1563,6 @@ bool_t p2m_mem_access_check(paddr_t gpa, unsigned long gla,
return (p2ma == p2m_access_n2rwx);
}
-void p2m_mem_access_resume(struct domain *d)
-{
- mem_event_response_t rsp;
-
- /* Pull all responses off the ring */
- while( mem_event_get_response(d, &d->mem_event->access, &rsp) )
- {
- struct vcpu *v;
-
- if ( rsp.flags & MEM_EVENT_FLAG_DUMMY )
- continue;
-
- /* Validate the vcpu_id in the response. */
- if ( (rsp.vcpu_id >= d->max_vcpus) || !d->vcpu[rsp.vcpu_id] )
- continue;
-
- v = d->vcpu[rsp.vcpu_id];
-
- /* Mark vcpu for skipping one instruction upon rescheduling. */
- if ( rsp.flags & MEM_EVENT_FLAG_EMULATE )
- {
- xenmem_access_t access;
- bool_t violation = 1;
-
- if ( p2m_get_mem_access(d, rsp.gfn, &access) == 0 )
- {
- switch ( access )
- {
- case XENMEM_access_n:
- case XENMEM_access_n2rwx:
- default:
- violation = rsp.access_r || rsp.access_w || rsp.access_x;
- break;
-
- case XENMEM_access_r:
- violation = rsp.access_w || rsp.access_x;
- break;
-
- case XENMEM_access_w:
- violation = rsp.access_r || rsp.access_x;
- break;
-
- case XENMEM_access_x:
- violation = rsp.access_r || rsp.access_w;
- break;
-
- case XENMEM_access_rx:
- case XENMEM_access_rx2rw:
- violation = rsp.access_w;
- break;
-
- case XENMEM_access_wx:
- violation = rsp.access_r;
- break;
-
- case XENMEM_access_rw:
- violation = rsp.access_x;
- break;
-
- case XENMEM_access_rwx:
- violation = 0;
- break;
- }
- }
-
- v->arch.mem_event.emulate_flags = violation ? rsp.flags : 0;
- }
-
- /* Unpause domain */
- if ( rsp.flags & MEM_EVENT_FLAG_VCPU_PAUSED )
- mem_event_vcpu_unpause(v);
- }
-}
-
/* Set access type for a region of pfns.
* If start_pfn == -1ul, sets the default access type */
long p2m_set_mem_access(struct domain *d, unsigned long pfn, uint32_t nr,
diff --git a/xen/common/mem_access.c b/xen/common/mem_access.c
index 9a8c1a9..64e5301 100644
--- a/xen/common/mem_access.c
+++ b/xen/common/mem_access.c
@@ -29,6 +29,32 @@
#include <asm/p2m.h>
#include <xsm/xsm.h>
+void mem_access_resume(struct domain *d)
+{
+ mem_event_response_t rsp;
+
+ /* Pull all responses off the ring. */
+ while ( mem_event_get_response(d, &d->mem_event->access, &rsp) )
+ {
+ struct vcpu *v;
+
+ if ( rsp.flags & MEM_EVENT_FLAG_DUMMY )
+ continue;
+
+ /* Validate the vcpu_id in the response. */
+ if ( (rsp.vcpu_id >= d->max_vcpus) || !d->vcpu[rsp.vcpu_id] )
+ continue;
+
+ v = d->vcpu[rsp.vcpu_id];
+
+ p2m_mem_event_emulate_check(v, &rsp);
+
+ /* Unpause domain. */
+ if ( rsp.flags & MEM_EVENT_FLAG_VCPU_PAUSED )
+ mem_event_vcpu_unpause(v);
+ }
+}
+
int mem_access_memop(unsigned long cmd,
XEN_GUEST_HANDLE_PARAM(xen_mem_access_op_t) arg)
{
@@ -58,7 +84,7 @@ int mem_access_memop(unsigned long cmd,
switch ( mao.op )
{
case XENMEM_access_op_resume:
- p2m_mem_access_resume(d);
+ mem_access_resume(d);
rc = 0;
break;
diff --git a/xen/common/mem_event.c b/xen/common/mem_event.c
index 7cc99b3..9f1a1b0 100644
--- a/xen/common/mem_event.c
+++ b/xen/common/mem_event.c
@@ -439,7 +439,7 @@ static void mem_paging_notification(struct vcpu *v, unsigned int port)
static void mem_access_notification(struct vcpu *v, unsigned int port)
{
if ( likely(v->domain->mem_event->access.ring_page != NULL) )
- p2m_mem_access_resume(v->domain);
+ mem_access_resume(v->domain);
}
#ifdef HAS_MEM_SHARING
diff --git a/xen/include/asm-arm/p2m.h b/xen/include/asm-arm/p2m.h
index faf14d3..38e32e6 100644
--- a/xen/include/asm-arm/p2m.h
+++ b/xen/include/asm-arm/p2m.h
@@ -66,6 +66,13 @@ typedef enum {
p2m_max_real_type, /* Types after this won't be store in the p2m */
} p2m_type_t;
+static inline
+void p2m_mem_event_emulate_check(struct vcpu *v,
+ const mem_event_response_t *rsp)
+{
+ /* Not supported on ARM. */
+};
+
#define p2m_is_foreign(_t) ((_t) == p2m_map_foreign)
#define p2m_is_ram(_t) ((_t) == p2m_ram_rw || (_t) == p2m_ram_ro)
diff --git a/xen/include/asm-x86/p2m.h b/xen/include/asm-x86/p2m.h
index a2a6289..1de493e 100644
--- a/xen/include/asm-x86/p2m.h
+++ b/xen/include/asm-x86/p2m.h
@@ -573,8 +573,6 @@ void p2m_mem_paging_resume(struct domain *d);
bool_t p2m_mem_access_check(paddr_t gpa, unsigned long gla,
struct npfec npfec,
mem_event_request_t **req_ptr);
-/* Resumes the running of the VCPU, restarting the last instruction */
-void p2m_mem_access_resume(struct domain *d);
/* Set access type for a region of pfns.
* If start_pfn == -1ul, sets the default access type */
@@ -586,6 +584,11 @@ long p2m_set_mem_access(struct domain *d, unsigned long start_pfn, uint32_t nr,
int p2m_get_mem_access(struct domain *d, unsigned long pfn,
xenmem_access_t *access);
+/* Check for emulation and mark vcpu for skipping one instruction
+ * upon rescheduling if required. */
+void p2m_mem_event_emulate_check(struct vcpu *v,
+ const mem_event_response_t *rsp);
+
/*
* Internal functions, only called by other p2m code
*/
diff --git a/xen/include/xen/mem_access.h b/xen/include/xen/mem_access.h
index 19d1a2d..6ceb2a4 100644
--- a/xen/include/xen/mem_access.h
+++ b/xen/include/xen/mem_access.h
@@ -31,6 +31,9 @@ int mem_access_memop(unsigned long cmd,
XEN_GUEST_HANDLE_PARAM(xen_mem_access_op_t) arg);
int mem_access_send_req(struct domain *d, mem_event_request_t *req);
+/* Resumes the running of the VCPU, restarting the last instruction */
+void mem_access_resume(struct domain *d);
+
#else
static inline
@@ -46,6 +49,8 @@ int mem_access_send_req(struct domain *d, mem_event_request_t *req)
return -ENOSYS;
}
+static inline void mem_access_resume(struct domain *d) {}
+
#endif /* HAS_MEM_ACCESS */
#endif /* _XEN_ASM_MEM_ACCESS_H */
--
2.1.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* [PATCH for-4.5 v9 06/19] xen: Relocate mem_event_op domctl and access_op memop into common.
2014-09-24 9:09 [PATCH for-4.5 v9 04/19] xen: Relocate p2m_mem_access_resume to mem_access common Tamas K Lengyel
@ 2014-09-24 9:09 ` Tamas K Lengyel
2014-09-24 12:22 ` Jan Beulich
2014-09-24 12:19 ` [PATCH for-4.5 v9 04/19] xen: Relocate p2m_mem_access_resume to mem_access common Jan Beulich
1 sibling, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Tamas K Lengyel @ 2014-09-24 9:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: xen-devel; +Cc: stefano.stabellini, keir, Tamas K Lengyel, jbeulich
Signed-off-by: Tamas K Lengyel <tklengyel@sec.in.tum.de>
---
v9: Rename abstracted function to p2m_setup_introspection.
v8: Move the new enable_msr_exit_interception test into the p2m layer.
v6: Grouping style fix of #includes in common/memory.c.
v5: Move memop compat into common as well.
Position domctl in switch relative to the domctl #.
v4: Don't remove memop handling from x86_64/compat and style fixes.
---
xen/arch/x86/domctl.c | 8 --------
xen/arch/x86/mm/p2m.c | 9 +++++++++
xen/arch/x86/x86_64/compat/mm.c | 4 ----
xen/arch/x86/x86_64/mm.c | 4 ----
xen/common/compat/memory.c | 5 +++++
xen/common/domctl.c | 7 +++++++
xen/common/mem_event.c | 10 ++++------
xen/common/memory.c | 9 +++++++--
xen/include/asm-arm/p2m.h | 6 ++++++
xen/include/asm-x86/p2m.h | 3 +++
10 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/domctl.c b/xen/arch/x86/domctl.c
index 8731e7f..ec77555 100644
--- a/xen/arch/x86/domctl.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/domctl.c
@@ -1131,14 +1131,6 @@ long arch_do_domctl(
}
break;
- case XEN_DOMCTL_mem_event_op:
- {
- ret = mem_event_domctl(d, &domctl->u.mem_event_op,
- guest_handle_cast(u_domctl, void));
- copyback = 1;
- }
- break;
-
case XEN_DOMCTL_mem_sharing_op:
{
ret = mem_sharing_domctl(d, &domctl->u.mem_sharing_op);
diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/mm/p2m.c b/xen/arch/x86/mm/p2m.c
index 08adaac..728e4eb 100644
--- a/xen/arch/x86/mm/p2m.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/mm/p2m.c
@@ -1436,6 +1436,15 @@ void p2m_mem_event_emulate_check(struct vcpu *v, const mem_event_response_t *rsp
}
}
+void p2m_setup_introspection(struct domain *d)
+{
+ if ( hvm_funcs.enable_msr_exit_interception )
+ {
+ d->arch.hvm_domain.introspection_enabled = 1;
+ hvm_funcs.enable_msr_exit_interception(d);
+ }
+}
+
bool_t p2m_mem_access_check(paddr_t gpa, unsigned long gla,
struct npfec npfec,
mem_event_request_t **req_ptr)
diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/x86_64/compat/mm.c b/xen/arch/x86/x86_64/compat/mm.c
index c079702..54f25b7 100644
--- a/xen/arch/x86/x86_64/compat/mm.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/x86_64/compat/mm.c
@@ -198,10 +198,6 @@ int compat_arch_memory_op(unsigned long cmd, XEN_GUEST_HANDLE_PARAM(void) arg)
break;
}
- case XENMEM_access_op:
- rc = mem_access_memop(cmd, guest_handle_cast(arg, xen_mem_access_op_t));
- break;
-
case XENMEM_sharing_op:
{
xen_mem_sharing_op_t mso;
diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/x86_64/mm.c b/xen/arch/x86/x86_64/mm.c
index cce1406..8e5a1a1 100644
--- a/xen/arch/x86/x86_64/mm.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/x86_64/mm.c
@@ -995,10 +995,6 @@ long subarch_memory_op(unsigned long cmd, XEN_GUEST_HANDLE_PARAM(void) arg)
break;
}
- case XENMEM_access_op:
- rc = mem_access_memop(cmd, guest_handle_cast(arg, xen_mem_access_op_t));
- break;
-
case XENMEM_sharing_op:
{
xen_mem_sharing_op_t mso;
diff --git a/xen/common/compat/memory.c b/xen/common/compat/memory.c
index 25dc016..43d02bc 100644
--- a/xen/common/compat/memory.c
+++ b/xen/common/compat/memory.c
@@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
#include <xen/guest_access.h>
#include <xen/sched.h>
#include <xen/event.h>
+#include <xen/mem_access.h>
#include <asm/current.h>
#include <compat/memory.h>
@@ -381,6 +382,10 @@ int compat_memory_op(unsigned int cmd, XEN_GUEST_HANDLE_PARAM(void) compat)
break;
}
+ case XENMEM_access_op:
+ rc = mem_access_memop(cmd, guest_handle_cast(compat, xen_mem_access_op_t));
+ break;
+
case XENMEM_add_to_physmap_batch:
start_extent = end_extent;
break;
diff --git a/xen/common/domctl.c b/xen/common/domctl.c
index 329e535..fd8dd44 100644
--- a/xen/common/domctl.c
+++ b/xen/common/domctl.c
@@ -24,6 +24,7 @@
#include <xen/bitmap.h>
#include <xen/paging.h>
#include <xen/hypercall.h>
+#include <xen/mem_event.h>
#include <asm/current.h>
#include <asm/irq.h>
#include <asm/page.h>
@@ -1111,6 +1112,12 @@ long do_domctl(XEN_GUEST_HANDLE_PARAM(xen_domctl_t) u_domctl)
}
break;
+ case XEN_DOMCTL_mem_event_op:
+ ret = mem_event_domctl(d, &op->u.mem_event_op,
+ guest_handle_cast(u_domctl, void));
+ copyback = 1;
+ break;
+
case XEN_DOMCTL_disable_migrate:
{
d->disable_migrate = op->u.disable_migrate.disable;
diff --git a/xen/common/mem_event.c b/xen/common/mem_event.c
index 9f1a1b0..4338826 100644
--- a/xen/common/mem_event.c
+++ b/xen/common/mem_event.c
@@ -623,12 +623,10 @@ int mem_event_domctl(struct domain *d, xen_domctl_mem_event_op_t *mec,
HVM_PARAM_ACCESS_RING_PFN,
mem_access_notification);
- if ( mec->op != XEN_DOMCTL_MEM_EVENT_OP_ACCESS_ENABLE &&
- rc == 0 && hvm_funcs.enable_msr_exit_interception )
- {
- d->arch.hvm_domain.introspection_enabled = 1;
- hvm_funcs.enable_msr_exit_interception(d);
- }
+ if ( mec->op == XEN_DOMCTL_MEM_EVENT_OP_ACCESS_ENABLE_INTROSPECTION
+ && !rc )
+ p2m_setup_introspection(d);
+
}
break;
diff --git a/xen/common/memory.c b/xen/common/memory.c
index bad50cb..cc36e39 100644
--- a/xen/common/memory.c
+++ b/xen/common/memory.c
@@ -21,13 +21,14 @@
#include <xen/errno.h>
#include <xen/tmem.h>
#include <xen/tmem_xen.h>
+#include <xen/numa.h>
+#include <xen/mem_access.h>
+#include <xen/trace.h>
#include <asm/current.h>
#include <asm/hardirq.h>
#include <asm/p2m.h>
-#include <xen/numa.h>
#include <public/memory.h>
#include <xsm/xsm.h>
-#include <xen/trace.h>
struct memop_args {
/* INPUT */
@@ -939,6 +940,10 @@ long do_memory_op(unsigned long cmd, XEN_GUEST_HANDLE_PARAM(void) arg)
break;
}
+ case XENMEM_access_op:
+ rc = mem_access_memop(cmd, guest_handle_cast(arg, xen_mem_access_op_t));
+ break;
+
case XENMEM_claim_pages:
if ( copy_from_guest(&reservation, arg, 1) )
return -EFAULT;
diff --git a/xen/include/asm-arm/p2m.h b/xen/include/asm-arm/p2m.h
index 4d5570a..10bf111 100644
--- a/xen/include/asm-arm/p2m.h
+++ b/xen/include/asm-arm/p2m.h
@@ -77,6 +77,12 @@ void p2m_mem_event_emulate_check(struct vcpu *v,
/* Not supported on ARM. */
};
+static inline
+void p2m_setup_introspection(struct domain *d)
+{
+ /* No special setup on ARM. */
+}
+
#define p2m_is_foreign(_t) ((_t) == p2m_map_foreign)
#define p2m_is_ram(_t) ((_t) == p2m_ram_rw || (_t) == p2m_ram_ro)
diff --git a/xen/include/asm-x86/p2m.h b/xen/include/asm-x86/p2m.h
index 1de493e..a0e1704 100644
--- a/xen/include/asm-x86/p2m.h
+++ b/xen/include/asm-x86/p2m.h
@@ -589,6 +589,9 @@ int p2m_get_mem_access(struct domain *d, unsigned long pfn,
void p2m_mem_event_emulate_check(struct vcpu *v,
const mem_event_response_t *rsp);
+/* Enable arch specific introspection options (such as MSR interception). */
+void p2m_setup_introspection(struct domain *d);
+
/*
* Internal functions, only called by other p2m code
*/
--
2.1.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH for-4.5 v9 04/19] xen: Relocate p2m_mem_access_resume to mem_access common
2014-09-24 9:09 [PATCH for-4.5 v9 04/19] xen: Relocate p2m_mem_access_resume to mem_access common Tamas K Lengyel
2014-09-24 9:09 ` [PATCH for-4.5 v9 06/19] xen: Relocate mem_event_op domctl and access_op memop into common Tamas K Lengyel
@ 2014-09-24 12:19 ` Jan Beulich
2014-09-24 13:05 ` Tamas K Lengyel
1 sibling, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Jan Beulich @ 2014-09-24 12:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tamas K Lengyel; +Cc: keir, stefano.stabellini, xen-devel
>>> On 24.09.14 at 11:09, <tklengyel@sec.in.tum.de> wrote:
> Relocate p2m_mem_access_resume to common and abstract the new
> p2m_mem_event_emulate_check into the p2m layer to.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tamas K Lengyel <tklengyel@sec.in.tum.de>
> ---
> v9: Pass the vcpu instead of the domain to emulate_check.
Is it correct that you resent just patches 4 and 6 as v9?
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/mm/p2m.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/mm/p2m.c
> @@ -1382,6 +1382,60 @@ static void p2m_mem_event_fill_regs(mem_event_request_t *req)
> req->x86_regs.cs_arbytes = seg.attr.bytes;
> }
>
> +void p2m_mem_event_emulate_check(struct vcpu *v, const mem_event_response_t *rsp)
> +{
> + /* Mark vcpu for skipping one instruction upon rescheduling. */
> + if ( rsp->flags & MEM_EVENT_FLAG_EMULATE )
> + {
> + struct domain *d = v->domain;
> + xenmem_access_t access;
> + bool_t violation = 1;
> +
> + if ( p2m_get_mem_access(d, rsp->gfn, &access) == 0 )
While it's certainly not wrong, I personally dislike such single use
local variables - you could easily (and without hampering readability)
pass v->domain here.
Jan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH for-4.5 v9 06/19] xen: Relocate mem_event_op domctl and access_op memop into common.
2014-09-24 9:09 ` [PATCH for-4.5 v9 06/19] xen: Relocate mem_event_op domctl and access_op memop into common Tamas K Lengyel
@ 2014-09-24 12:22 ` Jan Beulich
2014-09-24 13:07 ` Tamas K Lengyel
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Jan Beulich @ 2014-09-24 12:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tamas K Lengyel; +Cc: keir, stefano.stabellini, xen-devel
>>> On 24.09.14 at 11:09, <tklengyel@sec.in.tum.de> wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Tamas K Lengyel <tklengyel@sec.in.tum.de>
for the non-ARM, non-x86/mm parts
Acked-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
But you failed to Cc relevant people for those other parts (and you
Cc-ed too few for the common code changes).
Jan
> ---
> v9: Rename abstracted function to p2m_setup_introspection.
> v8: Move the new enable_msr_exit_interception test into the p2m layer.
> v6: Grouping style fix of #includes in common/memory.c.
> v5: Move memop compat into common as well.
> Position domctl in switch relative to the domctl #.
> v4: Don't remove memop handling from x86_64/compat and style fixes.
> ---
> xen/arch/x86/domctl.c | 8 --------
> xen/arch/x86/mm/p2m.c | 9 +++++++++
> xen/arch/x86/x86_64/compat/mm.c | 4 ----
> xen/arch/x86/x86_64/mm.c | 4 ----
> xen/common/compat/memory.c | 5 +++++
> xen/common/domctl.c | 7 +++++++
> xen/common/mem_event.c | 10 ++++------
> xen/common/memory.c | 9 +++++++--
> xen/include/asm-arm/p2m.h | 6 ++++++
> xen/include/asm-x86/p2m.h | 3 +++
> 10 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/domctl.c b/xen/arch/x86/domctl.c
> index 8731e7f..ec77555 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/domctl.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/domctl.c
> @@ -1131,14 +1131,6 @@ long arch_do_domctl(
> }
> break;
>
> - case XEN_DOMCTL_mem_event_op:
> - {
> - ret = mem_event_domctl(d, &domctl->u.mem_event_op,
> - guest_handle_cast(u_domctl, void));
> - copyback = 1;
> - }
> - break;
> -
> case XEN_DOMCTL_mem_sharing_op:
> {
> ret = mem_sharing_domctl(d, &domctl->u.mem_sharing_op);
> diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/mm/p2m.c b/xen/arch/x86/mm/p2m.c
> index 08adaac..728e4eb 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/mm/p2m.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/mm/p2m.c
> @@ -1436,6 +1436,15 @@ void p2m_mem_event_emulate_check(struct vcpu *v, const
> mem_event_response_t *rsp
> }
> }
>
> +void p2m_setup_introspection(struct domain *d)
> +{
> + if ( hvm_funcs.enable_msr_exit_interception )
> + {
> + d->arch.hvm_domain.introspection_enabled = 1;
> + hvm_funcs.enable_msr_exit_interception(d);
> + }
> +}
> +
> bool_t p2m_mem_access_check(paddr_t gpa, unsigned long gla,
> struct npfec npfec,
> mem_event_request_t **req_ptr)
> diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/x86_64/compat/mm.c b/xen/arch/x86/x86_64/compat/mm.c
> index c079702..54f25b7 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/x86_64/compat/mm.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/x86_64/compat/mm.c
> @@ -198,10 +198,6 @@ int compat_arch_memory_op(unsigned long cmd,
> XEN_GUEST_HANDLE_PARAM(void) arg)
> break;
> }
>
> - case XENMEM_access_op:
> - rc = mem_access_memop(cmd, guest_handle_cast(arg,
> xen_mem_access_op_t));
> - break;
> -
> case XENMEM_sharing_op:
> {
> xen_mem_sharing_op_t mso;
> diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/x86_64/mm.c b/xen/arch/x86/x86_64/mm.c
> index cce1406..8e5a1a1 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/x86_64/mm.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/x86_64/mm.c
> @@ -995,10 +995,6 @@ long subarch_memory_op(unsigned long cmd,
> XEN_GUEST_HANDLE_PARAM(void) arg)
> break;
> }
>
> - case XENMEM_access_op:
> - rc = mem_access_memop(cmd, guest_handle_cast(arg,
> xen_mem_access_op_t));
> - break;
> -
> case XENMEM_sharing_op:
> {
> xen_mem_sharing_op_t mso;
> diff --git a/xen/common/compat/memory.c b/xen/common/compat/memory.c
> index 25dc016..43d02bc 100644
> --- a/xen/common/compat/memory.c
> +++ b/xen/common/compat/memory.c
> @@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
> #include <xen/guest_access.h>
> #include <xen/sched.h>
> #include <xen/event.h>
> +#include <xen/mem_access.h>
> #include <asm/current.h>
> #include <compat/memory.h>
>
> @@ -381,6 +382,10 @@ int compat_memory_op(unsigned int cmd,
> XEN_GUEST_HANDLE_PARAM(void) compat)
> break;
> }
>
> + case XENMEM_access_op:
> + rc = mem_access_memop(cmd, guest_handle_cast(compat,
> xen_mem_access_op_t));
> + break;
> +
> case XENMEM_add_to_physmap_batch:
> start_extent = end_extent;
> break;
> diff --git a/xen/common/domctl.c b/xen/common/domctl.c
> index 329e535..fd8dd44 100644
> --- a/xen/common/domctl.c
> +++ b/xen/common/domctl.c
> @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@
> #include <xen/bitmap.h>
> #include <xen/paging.h>
> #include <xen/hypercall.h>
> +#include <xen/mem_event.h>
> #include <asm/current.h>
> #include <asm/irq.h>
> #include <asm/page.h>
> @@ -1111,6 +1112,12 @@ long do_domctl(XEN_GUEST_HANDLE_PARAM(xen_domctl_t)
> u_domctl)
> }
> break;
>
> + case XEN_DOMCTL_mem_event_op:
> + ret = mem_event_domctl(d, &op->u.mem_event_op,
> + guest_handle_cast(u_domctl, void));
> + copyback = 1;
> + break;
> +
> case XEN_DOMCTL_disable_migrate:
> {
> d->disable_migrate = op->u.disable_migrate.disable;
> diff --git a/xen/common/mem_event.c b/xen/common/mem_event.c
> index 9f1a1b0..4338826 100644
> --- a/xen/common/mem_event.c
> +++ b/xen/common/mem_event.c
> @@ -623,12 +623,10 @@ int mem_event_domctl(struct domain *d,
> xen_domctl_mem_event_op_t *mec,
> HVM_PARAM_ACCESS_RING_PFN,
> mem_access_notification);
>
> - if ( mec->op != XEN_DOMCTL_MEM_EVENT_OP_ACCESS_ENABLE &&
> - rc == 0 && hvm_funcs.enable_msr_exit_interception )
> - {
> - d->arch.hvm_domain.introspection_enabled = 1;
> - hvm_funcs.enable_msr_exit_interception(d);
> - }
> + if ( mec->op ==
> XEN_DOMCTL_MEM_EVENT_OP_ACCESS_ENABLE_INTROSPECTION
> + && !rc )
> + p2m_setup_introspection(d);
> +
> }
> break;
>
> diff --git a/xen/common/memory.c b/xen/common/memory.c
> index bad50cb..cc36e39 100644
> --- a/xen/common/memory.c
> +++ b/xen/common/memory.c
> @@ -21,13 +21,14 @@
> #include <xen/errno.h>
> #include <xen/tmem.h>
> #include <xen/tmem_xen.h>
> +#include <xen/numa.h>
> +#include <xen/mem_access.h>
> +#include <xen/trace.h>
> #include <asm/current.h>
> #include <asm/hardirq.h>
> #include <asm/p2m.h>
> -#include <xen/numa.h>
> #include <public/memory.h>
> #include <xsm/xsm.h>
> -#include <xen/trace.h>
>
> struct memop_args {
> /* INPUT */
> @@ -939,6 +940,10 @@ long do_memory_op(unsigned long cmd,
> XEN_GUEST_HANDLE_PARAM(void) arg)
> break;
> }
>
> + case XENMEM_access_op:
> + rc = mem_access_memop(cmd, guest_handle_cast(arg,
> xen_mem_access_op_t));
> + break;
> +
> case XENMEM_claim_pages:
> if ( copy_from_guest(&reservation, arg, 1) )
> return -EFAULT;
> diff --git a/xen/include/asm-arm/p2m.h b/xen/include/asm-arm/p2m.h
> index 4d5570a..10bf111 100644
> --- a/xen/include/asm-arm/p2m.h
> +++ b/xen/include/asm-arm/p2m.h
> @@ -77,6 +77,12 @@ void p2m_mem_event_emulate_check(struct vcpu *v,
> /* Not supported on ARM. */
> };
>
> +static inline
> +void p2m_setup_introspection(struct domain *d)
> +{
> + /* No special setup on ARM. */
> +}
> +
> #define p2m_is_foreign(_t) ((_t) == p2m_map_foreign)
> #define p2m_is_ram(_t) ((_t) == p2m_ram_rw || (_t) == p2m_ram_ro)
>
> diff --git a/xen/include/asm-x86/p2m.h b/xen/include/asm-x86/p2m.h
> index 1de493e..a0e1704 100644
> --- a/xen/include/asm-x86/p2m.h
> +++ b/xen/include/asm-x86/p2m.h
> @@ -589,6 +589,9 @@ int p2m_get_mem_access(struct domain *d, unsigned long
> pfn,
> void p2m_mem_event_emulate_check(struct vcpu *v,
> const mem_event_response_t *rsp);
>
> +/* Enable arch specific introspection options (such as MSR interception).
> */
> +void p2m_setup_introspection(struct domain *d);
> +
> /*
> * Internal functions, only called by other p2m code
> */
> --
> 2.1.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH for-4.5 v9 04/19] xen: Relocate p2m_mem_access_resume to mem_access common
2014-09-24 12:19 ` [PATCH for-4.5 v9 04/19] xen: Relocate p2m_mem_access_resume to mem_access common Jan Beulich
@ 2014-09-24 13:05 ` Tamas K Lengyel
2014-09-24 13:33 ` Jan Beulich
2014-09-24 13:42 ` Jan Beulich
0 siblings, 2 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Tamas K Lengyel @ 2014-09-24 13:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jan Beulich; +Cc: Stefano Stabellini, Keir Fraser, Tamas K Lengyel, xen-devel
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1543 bytes --]
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 2:19 PM, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com> wrote:
> >>> On 24.09.14 at 11:09, <tklengyel@sec.in.tum.de> wrote:
> > Relocate p2m_mem_access_resume to common and abstract the new
> > p2m_mem_event_emulate_check into the p2m layer to.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Tamas K Lengyel <tklengyel@sec.in.tum.de>
> > ---
> > v9: Pass the vcpu instead of the domain to emulate_check.
>
> Is it correct that you resent just patches 4 and 6 as v9?
>
I didn't want to resend the entire 19 set series for just these two updates.
>
> > --- a/xen/arch/x86/mm/p2m.c
> > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/mm/p2m.c
> > @@ -1382,6 +1382,60 @@ static void
> p2m_mem_event_fill_regs(mem_event_request_t *req)
> > req->x86_regs.cs_arbytes = seg.attr.bytes;
> > }
> >
> > +void p2m_mem_event_emulate_check(struct vcpu *v, const
> mem_event_response_t *rsp)
> > +{
> > + /* Mark vcpu for skipping one instruction upon rescheduling. */
> > + if ( rsp->flags & MEM_EVENT_FLAG_EMULATE )
> > + {
> > + struct domain *d = v->domain;
> > + xenmem_access_t access;
> > + bool_t violation = 1;
> > +
> > + if ( p2m_get_mem_access(d, rsp->gfn, &access) == 0 )
>
> While it's certainly not wrong, I personally dislike such single use
> local variables - you could easily (and without hampering readability)
> pass v->domain here.
>
Certainly. Does it worth another resend?
Tamas
>
> Jan
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
> http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
>
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 2726 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 126 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH for-4.5 v9 06/19] xen: Relocate mem_event_op domctl and access_op memop into common.
2014-09-24 12:22 ` Jan Beulich
@ 2014-09-24 13:07 ` Tamas K Lengyel
0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Tamas K Lengyel @ 2014-09-24 13:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jan Beulich; +Cc: Stefano Stabellini, Keir Fraser, Tamas K Lengyel, xen-devel
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 8926 bytes --]
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 2:22 PM, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com> wrote:
> >>> On 24.09.14 at 11:09, <tklengyel@sec.in.tum.de> wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Tamas K Lengyel <tklengyel@sec.in.tum.de>
>
> for the non-ARM, non-x86/mm parts
> Acked-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
>
> But you failed to Cc relevant people for those other parts (and you
> Cc-ed too few for the common code changes).
>
Thanks. I used the get_maintainer.pl script to grab only the relevant folks
for these two patches. I'm not sure why it did miss folks.
Tamas
>
> Jan
>
> > ---
> > v9: Rename abstracted function to p2m_setup_introspection.
> > v8: Move the new enable_msr_exit_interception test into the p2m layer.
> > v6: Grouping style fix of #includes in common/memory.c.
> > v5: Move memop compat into common as well.
> > Position domctl in switch relative to the domctl #.
> > v4: Don't remove memop handling from x86_64/compat and style fixes.
> > ---
> > xen/arch/x86/domctl.c | 8 --------
> > xen/arch/x86/mm/p2m.c | 9 +++++++++
> > xen/arch/x86/x86_64/compat/mm.c | 4 ----
> > xen/arch/x86/x86_64/mm.c | 4 ----
> > xen/common/compat/memory.c | 5 +++++
> > xen/common/domctl.c | 7 +++++++
> > xen/common/mem_event.c | 10 ++++------
> > xen/common/memory.c | 9 +++++++--
> > xen/include/asm-arm/p2m.h | 6 ++++++
> > xen/include/asm-x86/p2m.h | 3 +++
> > 10 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/domctl.c b/xen/arch/x86/domctl.c
> > index 8731e7f..ec77555 100644
> > --- a/xen/arch/x86/domctl.c
> > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/domctl.c
> > @@ -1131,14 +1131,6 @@ long arch_do_domctl(
> > }
> > break;
> >
> > - case XEN_DOMCTL_mem_event_op:
> > - {
> > - ret = mem_event_domctl(d, &domctl->u.mem_event_op,
> > - guest_handle_cast(u_domctl, void));
> > - copyback = 1;
> > - }
> > - break;
> > -
> > case XEN_DOMCTL_mem_sharing_op:
> > {
> > ret = mem_sharing_domctl(d, &domctl->u.mem_sharing_op);
> > diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/mm/p2m.c b/xen/arch/x86/mm/p2m.c
> > index 08adaac..728e4eb 100644
> > --- a/xen/arch/x86/mm/p2m.c
> > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/mm/p2m.c
> > @@ -1436,6 +1436,15 @@ void p2m_mem_event_emulate_check(struct vcpu *v,
> const
> > mem_event_response_t *rsp
> > }
> > }
> >
> > +void p2m_setup_introspection(struct domain *d)
> > +{
> > + if ( hvm_funcs.enable_msr_exit_interception )
> > + {
> > + d->arch.hvm_domain.introspection_enabled = 1;
> > + hvm_funcs.enable_msr_exit_interception(d);
> > + }
> > +}
> > +
> > bool_t p2m_mem_access_check(paddr_t gpa, unsigned long gla,
> > struct npfec npfec,
> > mem_event_request_t **req_ptr)
> > diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/x86_64/compat/mm.c
> b/xen/arch/x86/x86_64/compat/mm.c
> > index c079702..54f25b7 100644
> > --- a/xen/arch/x86/x86_64/compat/mm.c
> > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/x86_64/compat/mm.c
> > @@ -198,10 +198,6 @@ int compat_arch_memory_op(unsigned long cmd,
> > XEN_GUEST_HANDLE_PARAM(void) arg)
> > break;
> > }
> >
> > - case XENMEM_access_op:
> > - rc = mem_access_memop(cmd, guest_handle_cast(arg,
> > xen_mem_access_op_t));
> > - break;
> > -
> > case XENMEM_sharing_op:
> > {
> > xen_mem_sharing_op_t mso;
> > diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/x86_64/mm.c b/xen/arch/x86/x86_64/mm.c
> > index cce1406..8e5a1a1 100644
> > --- a/xen/arch/x86/x86_64/mm.c
> > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/x86_64/mm.c
> > @@ -995,10 +995,6 @@ long subarch_memory_op(unsigned long cmd,
> > XEN_GUEST_HANDLE_PARAM(void) arg)
> > break;
> > }
> >
> > - case XENMEM_access_op:
> > - rc = mem_access_memop(cmd, guest_handle_cast(arg,
> > xen_mem_access_op_t));
> > - break;
> > -
> > case XENMEM_sharing_op:
> > {
> > xen_mem_sharing_op_t mso;
> > diff --git a/xen/common/compat/memory.c b/xen/common/compat/memory.c
> > index 25dc016..43d02bc 100644
> > --- a/xen/common/compat/memory.c
> > +++ b/xen/common/compat/memory.c
> > @@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
> > #include <xen/guest_access.h>
> > #include <xen/sched.h>
> > #include <xen/event.h>
> > +#include <xen/mem_access.h>
> > #include <asm/current.h>
> > #include <compat/memory.h>
> >
> > @@ -381,6 +382,10 @@ int compat_memory_op(unsigned int cmd,
> > XEN_GUEST_HANDLE_PARAM(void) compat)
> > break;
> > }
> >
> > + case XENMEM_access_op:
> > + rc = mem_access_memop(cmd, guest_handle_cast(compat,
> > xen_mem_access_op_t));
> > + break;
> > +
> > case XENMEM_add_to_physmap_batch:
> > start_extent = end_extent;
> > break;
> > diff --git a/xen/common/domctl.c b/xen/common/domctl.c
> > index 329e535..fd8dd44 100644
> > --- a/xen/common/domctl.c
> > +++ b/xen/common/domctl.c
> > @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@
> > #include <xen/bitmap.h>
> > #include <xen/paging.h>
> > #include <xen/hypercall.h>
> > +#include <xen/mem_event.h>
> > #include <asm/current.h>
> > #include <asm/irq.h>
> > #include <asm/page.h>
> > @@ -1111,6 +1112,12 @@ long
> do_domctl(XEN_GUEST_HANDLE_PARAM(xen_domctl_t)
> > u_domctl)
> > }
> > break;
> >
> > + case XEN_DOMCTL_mem_event_op:
> > + ret = mem_event_domctl(d, &op->u.mem_event_op,
> > + guest_handle_cast(u_domctl, void));
> > + copyback = 1;
> > + break;
> > +
> > case XEN_DOMCTL_disable_migrate:
> > {
> > d->disable_migrate = op->u.disable_migrate.disable;
> > diff --git a/xen/common/mem_event.c b/xen/common/mem_event.c
> > index 9f1a1b0..4338826 100644
> > --- a/xen/common/mem_event.c
> > +++ b/xen/common/mem_event.c
> > @@ -623,12 +623,10 @@ int mem_event_domctl(struct domain *d,
> > xen_domctl_mem_event_op_t *mec,
> > HVM_PARAM_ACCESS_RING_PFN,
> > mem_access_notification);
> >
> > - if ( mec->op != XEN_DOMCTL_MEM_EVENT_OP_ACCESS_ENABLE &&
> > - rc == 0 && hvm_funcs.enable_msr_exit_interception )
> > - {
> > - d->arch.hvm_domain.introspection_enabled = 1;
> > - hvm_funcs.enable_msr_exit_interception(d);
> > - }
> > + if ( mec->op ==
> > XEN_DOMCTL_MEM_EVENT_OP_ACCESS_ENABLE_INTROSPECTION
> > + && !rc )
> > + p2m_setup_introspection(d);
> > +
> > }
> > break;
> >
> > diff --git a/xen/common/memory.c b/xen/common/memory.c
> > index bad50cb..cc36e39 100644
> > --- a/xen/common/memory.c
> > +++ b/xen/common/memory.c
> > @@ -21,13 +21,14 @@
> > #include <xen/errno.h>
> > #include <xen/tmem.h>
> > #include <xen/tmem_xen.h>
> > +#include <xen/numa.h>
> > +#include <xen/mem_access.h>
> > +#include <xen/trace.h>
> > #include <asm/current.h>
> > #include <asm/hardirq.h>
> > #include <asm/p2m.h>
> > -#include <xen/numa.h>
> > #include <public/memory.h>
> > #include <xsm/xsm.h>
> > -#include <xen/trace.h>
> >
> > struct memop_args {
> > /* INPUT */
> > @@ -939,6 +940,10 @@ long do_memory_op(unsigned long cmd,
> > XEN_GUEST_HANDLE_PARAM(void) arg)
> > break;
> > }
> >
> > + case XENMEM_access_op:
> > + rc = mem_access_memop(cmd, guest_handle_cast(arg,
> > xen_mem_access_op_t));
> > + break;
> > +
> > case XENMEM_claim_pages:
> > if ( copy_from_guest(&reservation, arg, 1) )
> > return -EFAULT;
> > diff --git a/xen/include/asm-arm/p2m.h b/xen/include/asm-arm/p2m.h
> > index 4d5570a..10bf111 100644
> > --- a/xen/include/asm-arm/p2m.h
> > +++ b/xen/include/asm-arm/p2m.h
> > @@ -77,6 +77,12 @@ void p2m_mem_event_emulate_check(struct vcpu *v,
> > /* Not supported on ARM. */
> > };
> >
> > +static inline
> > +void p2m_setup_introspection(struct domain *d)
> > +{
> > + /* No special setup on ARM. */
> > +}
> > +
> > #define p2m_is_foreign(_t) ((_t) == p2m_map_foreign)
> > #define p2m_is_ram(_t) ((_t) == p2m_ram_rw || (_t) == p2m_ram_ro)
> >
> > diff --git a/xen/include/asm-x86/p2m.h b/xen/include/asm-x86/p2m.h
> > index 1de493e..a0e1704 100644
> > --- a/xen/include/asm-x86/p2m.h
> > +++ b/xen/include/asm-x86/p2m.h
> > @@ -589,6 +589,9 @@ int p2m_get_mem_access(struct domain *d, unsigned
> long
> > pfn,
> > void p2m_mem_event_emulate_check(struct vcpu *v,
> > const mem_event_response_t *rsp);
> >
> > +/* Enable arch specific introspection options (such as MSR
> interception).
> > */
> > +void p2m_setup_introspection(struct domain *d);
> > +
> > /*
> > * Internal functions, only called by other p2m code
> > */
> > --
> > 2.1.0
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
> http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
>
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 11540 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 126 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH for-4.5 v9 04/19] xen: Relocate p2m_mem_access_resume to mem_access common
2014-09-24 13:05 ` Tamas K Lengyel
@ 2014-09-24 13:33 ` Jan Beulich
2014-09-24 13:42 ` Jan Beulich
1 sibling, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Jan Beulich @ 2014-09-24 13:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tamas K Lengyel
Cc: Keir Fraser, Stefano Stabellini, Tamas K Lengyel, xen-devel
>>> On 24.09.14 at 15:05, <tamas.lengyel@zentific.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 2:19 PM, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com> wrote:
>
>> >>> On 24.09.14 at 11:09, <tklengyel@sec.in.tum.de> wrote:
>> > Relocate p2m_mem_access_resume to common and abstract the new
>> > p2m_mem_event_emulate_check into the p2m layer to.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Tamas K Lengyel <tklengyel@sec.in.tum.de>
>> > ---
>> > v9: Pass the vcpu instead of the domain to emulate_check.
>>
>> Is it correct that you resent just patches 4 and 6 as v9?
>>
>
> I didn't want to resend the entire 19 set series for just these two updates.
Which is fine I guess, I just wanted to double check.
>> > --- a/xen/arch/x86/mm/p2m.c
>> > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/mm/p2m.c
>> > @@ -1382,6 +1382,60 @@ static void
>> p2m_mem_event_fill_regs(mem_event_request_t *req)
>> > req->x86_regs.cs_arbytes = seg.attr.bytes;
>> > }
>> >
>> > +void p2m_mem_event_emulate_check(struct vcpu *v, const
>> mem_event_response_t *rsp)
>> > +{
>> > + /* Mark vcpu for skipping one instruction upon rescheduling. */
>> > + if ( rsp->flags & MEM_EVENT_FLAG_EMULATE )
>> > + {
>> > + struct domain *d = v->domain;
>> > + xenmem_access_t access;
>> > + bool_t violation = 1;
>> > +
>> > + if ( p2m_get_mem_access(d, rsp->gfn, &access) == 0 )
>>
>> While it's certainly not wrong, I personally dislike such single use
>> local variables - you could easily (and without hampering readability)
>> pass v->domain here.
>>
>
> Certainly. Does it worth another resend?
Probably not if no other need for resending arises.
Jan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH for-4.5 v9 04/19] xen: Relocate p2m_mem_access_resume to mem_access common
2014-09-24 13:05 ` Tamas K Lengyel
2014-09-24 13:33 ` Jan Beulich
@ 2014-09-24 13:42 ` Jan Beulich
2014-09-24 14:47 ` Tamas K Lengyel
1 sibling, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Jan Beulich @ 2014-09-24 13:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tamas K Lengyel
Cc: Keir Fraser, Stefano Stabellini, Tamas K Lengyel, xen-devel
>>> On 24.09.14 at 15:05, <tamas.lengyel@zentific.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 2:19 PM, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com> wrote:
>> >>> On 24.09.14 at 11:09, <tklengyel@sec.in.tum.de> wrote:
>> > --- a/xen/arch/x86/mm/p2m.c
>> > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/mm/p2m.c
>> > @@ -1382,6 +1382,60 @@ static void
>> p2m_mem_event_fill_regs(mem_event_request_t *req)
>> > req->x86_regs.cs_arbytes = seg.attr.bytes;
>> > }
>> >
>> > +void p2m_mem_event_emulate_check(struct vcpu *v, const
>> mem_event_response_t *rsp)
>> > +{
>> > + /* Mark vcpu for skipping one instruction upon rescheduling. */
>> > + if ( rsp->flags & MEM_EVENT_FLAG_EMULATE )
>> > + {
>> > + struct domain *d = v->domain;
>> > + xenmem_access_t access;
>> > + bool_t violation = 1;
>> > +
>> > + if ( p2m_get_mem_access(d, rsp->gfn, &access) == 0 )
>>
>> While it's certainly not wrong, I personally dislike such single use
>> local variables - you could easily (and without hampering readability)
>> pass v->domain here.
>>
>
> Certainly. Does it worth another resend?
Actually (correcting my earlier reply) I think together with the missed
Cc-s on both v9 patches, re-sending would be desirable, in which
case the cosmetic change above should be done at once.
Jan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH for-4.5 v9 04/19] xen: Relocate p2m_mem_access_resume to mem_access common
2014-09-24 13:42 ` Jan Beulich
@ 2014-09-24 14:47 ` Tamas K Lengyel
2014-09-24 14:52 ` Jan Beulich
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Tamas K Lengyel @ 2014-09-24 14:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jan Beulich; +Cc: Keir Fraser, Stefano Stabellini, xen-devel
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1608 bytes --]
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 3:42 PM, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com> wrote:
> >>> On 24.09.14 at 15:05, <tamas.lengyel@zentific.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 2:19 PM, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com> wrote:
> >> >>> On 24.09.14 at 11:09, <tklengyel@sec.in.tum.de> wrote:
> >> > --- a/xen/arch/x86/mm/p2m.c
> >> > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/mm/p2m.c
> >> > @@ -1382,6 +1382,60 @@ static void
> >> p2m_mem_event_fill_regs(mem_event_request_t *req)
> >> > req->x86_regs.cs_arbytes = seg.attr.bytes;
> >> > }
> >> >
> >> > +void p2m_mem_event_emulate_check(struct vcpu *v, const
> >> mem_event_response_t *rsp)
> >> > +{
> >> > + /* Mark vcpu for skipping one instruction upon rescheduling. */
> >> > + if ( rsp->flags & MEM_EVENT_FLAG_EMULATE )
> >> > + {
> >> > + struct domain *d = v->domain;
> >> > + xenmem_access_t access;
> >> > + bool_t violation = 1;
> >> > +
> >> > + if ( p2m_get_mem_access(d, rsp->gfn, &access) == 0 )
> >>
> >> While it's certainly not wrong, I personally dislike such single use
> >> local variables - you could easily (and without hampering readability)
> >> pass v->domain here.
> >>
> >
> > Certainly. Does it worth another resend?
>
> Actually (correcting my earlier reply) I think together with the missed
> Cc-s on both v9 patches, re-sending would be desirable, in which
> case the cosmetic change above should be done at once.
>
> Jan
>
According to get_maintainer I only missed Tim from the original cc list. I
don't want to spam other maintainers with just these updates, so do you see
anyone else that should be on this?
Tamas
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 2566 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 126 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH for-4.5 v9 04/19] xen: Relocate p2m_mem_access_resume to mem_access common
2014-09-24 14:47 ` Tamas K Lengyel
@ 2014-09-24 14:52 ` Jan Beulich
2014-09-24 14:54 ` Tamas K Lengyel
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Jan Beulich @ 2014-09-24 14:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tamas K Lengyel; +Cc: Keir Fraser, Stefano Stabellini, xen-devel
>>> On 24.09.14 at 16:47, <tamas.lengyel@zentific.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 3:42 PM, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com> wrote:
>
>> >>> On 24.09.14 at 15:05, <tamas.lengyel@zentific.com> wrote:
>> > On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 2:19 PM, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com> wrote:
>> >> >>> On 24.09.14 at 11:09, <tklengyel@sec.in.tum.de> wrote:
>> >> > --- a/xen/arch/x86/mm/p2m.c
>> >> > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/mm/p2m.c
>> >> > @@ -1382,6 +1382,60 @@ static void
>> >> p2m_mem_event_fill_regs(mem_event_request_t *req)
>> >> > req->x86_regs.cs_arbytes = seg.attr.bytes;
>> >> > }
>> >> >
>> >> > +void p2m_mem_event_emulate_check(struct vcpu *v, const
>> >> mem_event_response_t *rsp)
>> >> > +{
>> >> > + /* Mark vcpu for skipping one instruction upon rescheduling. */
>> >> > + if ( rsp->flags & MEM_EVENT_FLAG_EMULATE )
>> >> > + {
>> >> > + struct domain *d = v->domain;
>> >> > + xenmem_access_t access;
>> >> > + bool_t violation = 1;
>> >> > +
>> >> > + if ( p2m_get_mem_access(d, rsp->gfn, &access) == 0 )
>> >>
>> >> While it's certainly not wrong, I personally dislike such single use
>> >> local variables - you could easily (and without hampering readability)
>> >> pass v->domain here.
>> >>
>> >
>> > Certainly. Does it worth another resend?
>>
>> Actually (correcting my earlier reply) I think together with the missed
>> Cc-s on both v9 patches, re-sending would be desirable, in which
>> case the cosmetic change above should be done at once.
>
> According to get_maintainer I only missed Tim from the original cc list. I
> don't want to spam other maintainers with just these updates, so do you see
> anyone else that should be on this?
IanC as another ARM maintainer? (And Tim is really kind of important
to Cc here.)
Jan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH for-4.5 v9 04/19] xen: Relocate p2m_mem_access_resume to mem_access common
2014-09-24 14:52 ` Jan Beulich
@ 2014-09-24 14:54 ` Tamas K Lengyel
0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Tamas K Lengyel @ 2014-09-24 14:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jan Beulich; +Cc: Keir Fraser, Stefano Stabellini, xen-devel
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2044 bytes --]
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 4:52 PM, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com> wrote:
> >>> On 24.09.14 at 16:47, <tamas.lengyel@zentific.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 3:42 PM, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com> wrote:
> >
> >> >>> On 24.09.14 at 15:05, <tamas.lengyel@zentific.com> wrote:
> >> > On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 2:19 PM, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
> wrote:
> >> >> >>> On 24.09.14 at 11:09, <tklengyel@sec.in.tum.de> wrote:
> >> >> > --- a/xen/arch/x86/mm/p2m.c
> >> >> > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/mm/p2m.c
> >> >> > @@ -1382,6 +1382,60 @@ static void
> >> >> p2m_mem_event_fill_regs(mem_event_request_t *req)
> >> >> > req->x86_regs.cs_arbytes = seg.attr.bytes;
> >> >> > }
> >> >> >
> >> >> > +void p2m_mem_event_emulate_check(struct vcpu *v, const
> >> >> mem_event_response_t *rsp)
> >> >> > +{
> >> >> > + /* Mark vcpu for skipping one instruction upon rescheduling.
> */
> >> >> > + if ( rsp->flags & MEM_EVENT_FLAG_EMULATE )
> >> >> > + {
> >> >> > + struct domain *d = v->domain;
> >> >> > + xenmem_access_t access;
> >> >> > + bool_t violation = 1;
> >> >> > +
> >> >> > + if ( p2m_get_mem_access(d, rsp->gfn, &access) == 0 )
> >> >>
> >> >> While it's certainly not wrong, I personally dislike such single use
> >> >> local variables - you could easily (and without hampering
> readability)
> >> >> pass v->domain here.
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> > Certainly. Does it worth another resend?
> >>
> >> Actually (correcting my earlier reply) I think together with the missed
> >> Cc-s on both v9 patches, re-sending would be desirable, in which
> >> case the cosmetic change above should be done at once.
> >
> > According to get_maintainer I only missed Tim from the original cc list.
> I
> > don't want to spam other maintainers with just these updates, so do you
> see
> > anyone else that should be on this?
>
> IanC as another ARM maintainer? (And Tim is really kind of important
> to Cc here.)
>
> Jan
>
OK, IanC is not popping up for these patches via get_maintainer for some
reason..
Tamas
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 3342 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 126 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-09-24 14:54 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-09-24 9:09 [PATCH for-4.5 v9 04/19] xen: Relocate p2m_mem_access_resume to mem_access common Tamas K Lengyel
2014-09-24 9:09 ` [PATCH for-4.5 v9 06/19] xen: Relocate mem_event_op domctl and access_op memop into common Tamas K Lengyel
2014-09-24 12:22 ` Jan Beulich
2014-09-24 13:07 ` Tamas K Lengyel
2014-09-24 12:19 ` [PATCH for-4.5 v9 04/19] xen: Relocate p2m_mem_access_resume to mem_access common Jan Beulich
2014-09-24 13:05 ` Tamas K Lengyel
2014-09-24 13:33 ` Jan Beulich
2014-09-24 13:42 ` Jan Beulich
2014-09-24 14:47 ` Tamas K Lengyel
2014-09-24 14:52 ` Jan Beulich
2014-09-24 14:54 ` Tamas K Lengyel
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.