* [PATCH v2 1/2] PCI: add helper function to find root port for device @ 2014-12-18 19:11 ` Lucas Stach 0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Lucas Stach @ 2014-12-18 19:11 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Bjorn Helgaas, Thierry Reding Cc: Alexandre Courbot, linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, linux-pci-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA This adds a simple way to get the root port a given device is connected to. Signed-off-by: Lucas Stach <l.stach-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org> --- v2: new patch in v2 --- drivers/pci/search.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++ include/linux/pci.h | 1 + 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/pci/search.c b/drivers/pci/search.c index a81f413083e4..c3ae1c52c7cf 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/search.c +++ b/drivers/pci/search.c @@ -385,3 +385,23 @@ int pci_dev_present(const struct pci_device_id *ids) return 0; } EXPORT_SYMBOL(pci_dev_present); + +/** + * pci_get_rootport - Returns the root port the given device is connected to. + * @dev: PCI device for which the root port should be found. + */ +struct pci_dev *pci_get_rootport(struct pci_dev *dev) +{ + struct pci_bus *bus = dev->bus; + + /* If there is no bridge on the bus the passed device is a root port. */ + if (!bus->self) + return dev; + + /* Walk up the PCI hierarchy to the first level below the root. */ + while (bus->parent && bus->parent->self) + bus = bus->parent; + + return bus->self; +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL(pci_get_rootport); diff --git a/include/linux/pci.h b/include/linux/pci.h index 4c8ac5fcc224..05442db50cad 100644 --- a/include/linux/pci.h +++ b/include/linux/pci.h @@ -843,6 +843,7 @@ static inline struct pci_dev *pci_get_bus_and_slot(unsigned int bus, } struct pci_dev *pci_get_class(unsigned int class, struct pci_dev *from); int pci_dev_present(const struct pci_device_id *ids); +struct pci_dev *pci_get_rootport(struct pci_dev *dev); int pci_bus_read_config_byte(struct pci_bus *bus, unsigned int devfn, int where, u8 *val); -- 2.1.3 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 1/2] PCI: add helper function to find root port for device @ 2014-12-18 19:11 ` Lucas Stach 0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Lucas Stach @ 2014-12-18 19:11 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Bjorn Helgaas, Thierry Reding; +Cc: Alexandre Courbot, linux-tegra, linux-pci This adds a simple way to get the root port a given device is connected to. Signed-off-by: Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de> --- v2: new patch in v2 --- drivers/pci/search.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++ include/linux/pci.h | 1 + 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/pci/search.c b/drivers/pci/search.c index a81f413083e4..c3ae1c52c7cf 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/search.c +++ b/drivers/pci/search.c @@ -385,3 +385,23 @@ int pci_dev_present(const struct pci_device_id *ids) return 0; } EXPORT_SYMBOL(pci_dev_present); + +/** + * pci_get_rootport - Returns the root port the given device is connected to. + * @dev: PCI device for which the root port should be found. + */ +struct pci_dev *pci_get_rootport(struct pci_dev *dev) +{ + struct pci_bus *bus = dev->bus; + + /* If there is no bridge on the bus the passed device is a root port. */ + if (!bus->self) + return dev; + + /* Walk up the PCI hierarchy to the first level below the root. */ + while (bus->parent && bus->parent->self) + bus = bus->parent; + + return bus->self; +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL(pci_get_rootport); diff --git a/include/linux/pci.h b/include/linux/pci.h index 4c8ac5fcc224..05442db50cad 100644 --- a/include/linux/pci.h +++ b/include/linux/pci.h @@ -843,6 +843,7 @@ static inline struct pci_dev *pci_get_bus_and_slot(unsigned int bus, } struct pci_dev *pci_get_class(unsigned int class, struct pci_dev *from); int pci_dev_present(const struct pci_device_id *ids); +struct pci_dev *pci_get_rootport(struct pci_dev *dev); int pci_bus_read_config_byte(struct pci_bus *bus, unsigned int devfn, int where, u8 *val); -- 2.1.3 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <1418929903-8506-1-git-send-email-l.stach-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>]
* [PATCH v2 2/2] PCI: tegra: apply relaxed ordering fixup only on Tegra 2014-12-18 19:11 ` Lucas Stach @ 2014-12-18 19:11 ` Lucas Stach -1 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Lucas Stach @ 2014-12-18 19:11 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Bjorn Helgaas, Thierry Reding Cc: Alexandre Courbot, linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, linux-pci-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA The fixup to enable relaxed ordering on all PCI devices was executed unconditionally if the Tegra PCI host driver was built into the kernel. This doesn't play nice with a multiplatform kernel executed on other platforms which may not need this fixup. Make sure to only apply the fixup if the root port is a Tegra. Signed-off-by: Lucas Stach <l.stach-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org> --- v2: - split out PCI hierarchy walk - separate code from data by moving PCI IDs into own structure --- drivers/pci/host/pci-tegra.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pci-tegra.c b/drivers/pci/host/pci-tegra.c index 333a57afacc4..b77f417e1a3c 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/host/pci-tegra.c +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pci-tegra.c @@ -635,10 +635,42 @@ DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_EARLY(PCI_VENDOR_ID_NVIDIA, 0x0bf1, tegra_pcie_fixup_class); DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_EARLY(PCI_VENDOR_ID_NVIDIA, 0x0e1c, tegra_pcie_fixup_class); DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_EARLY(PCI_VENDOR_ID_NVIDIA, 0x0e1d, tegra_pcie_fixup_class); +static const struct pci_device_id tegra_rootport_ids[] = { + { + /* Tegra20 4 lane root port */ + .vendor = PCI_VENDOR_ID_NVIDIA, .device = 0x0bf0, + .subvendor = PCI_ANY_ID, .subdevice = PCI_ANY_ID + }, { + /* Tegra20 2 lane root port */ + .vendor = PCI_VENDOR_ID_NVIDIA, .device = 0x0bf1, + .subvendor = PCI_ANY_ID, .subdevice = PCI_ANY_ID + }, { + /* Tegra30 4 lane root port */ + .vendor = PCI_VENDOR_ID_NVIDIA, .device = 0x0e1c, + .subvendor = PCI_ANY_ID, .subdevice = PCI_ANY_ID + }, { + /* Tegra30 2 lane root port */ + .vendor = PCI_VENDOR_ID_NVIDIA, .device = 0x0e1d, + .subvendor = PCI_ANY_ID, .subdevice = PCI_ANY_ID + }, { + /* Tegra124 4 lane root port */ + .vendor = PCI_VENDOR_ID_NVIDIA, .device = 0x0e12, + .subvendor = PCI_ANY_ID, .subdevice = PCI_ANY_ID + }, { + /* Tegra124 1 lane root port */ + .vendor = PCI_VENDOR_ID_NVIDIA, .device = 0x0e13, + .subvendor = PCI_ANY_ID, .subdevice = PCI_ANY_ID + }, { + /* sentinel */ + } +}; + /* Tegra PCIE requires relaxed ordering */ static void tegra_pcie_relax_enable(struct pci_dev *dev) { - pcie_capability_set_word(dev, PCI_EXP_DEVCTL, PCI_EXP_DEVCTL_RELAX_EN); + if (pci_match_id(tegra_rootport_ids, pci_get_rootport(dev))) + pcie_capability_set_word(dev, PCI_EXP_DEVCTL, + PCI_EXP_DEVCTL_RELAX_EN); } DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_FINAL(PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, tegra_pcie_relax_enable); -- 2.1.3 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 2/2] PCI: tegra: apply relaxed ordering fixup only on Tegra @ 2014-12-18 19:11 ` Lucas Stach 0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Lucas Stach @ 2014-12-18 19:11 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Bjorn Helgaas, Thierry Reding; +Cc: Alexandre Courbot, linux-tegra, linux-pci The fixup to enable relaxed ordering on all PCI devices was executed unconditionally if the Tegra PCI host driver was built into the kernel. This doesn't play nice with a multiplatform kernel executed on other platforms which may not need this fixup. Make sure to only apply the fixup if the root port is a Tegra. Signed-off-by: Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de> --- v2: - split out PCI hierarchy walk - separate code from data by moving PCI IDs into own structure --- drivers/pci/host/pci-tegra.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pci-tegra.c b/drivers/pci/host/pci-tegra.c index 333a57afacc4..b77f417e1a3c 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/host/pci-tegra.c +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pci-tegra.c @@ -635,10 +635,42 @@ DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_EARLY(PCI_VENDOR_ID_NVIDIA, 0x0bf1, tegra_pcie_fixup_class); DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_EARLY(PCI_VENDOR_ID_NVIDIA, 0x0e1c, tegra_pcie_fixup_class); DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_EARLY(PCI_VENDOR_ID_NVIDIA, 0x0e1d, tegra_pcie_fixup_class); +static const struct pci_device_id tegra_rootport_ids[] = { + { + /* Tegra20 4 lane root port */ + .vendor = PCI_VENDOR_ID_NVIDIA, .device = 0x0bf0, + .subvendor = PCI_ANY_ID, .subdevice = PCI_ANY_ID + }, { + /* Tegra20 2 lane root port */ + .vendor = PCI_VENDOR_ID_NVIDIA, .device = 0x0bf1, + .subvendor = PCI_ANY_ID, .subdevice = PCI_ANY_ID + }, { + /* Tegra30 4 lane root port */ + .vendor = PCI_VENDOR_ID_NVIDIA, .device = 0x0e1c, + .subvendor = PCI_ANY_ID, .subdevice = PCI_ANY_ID + }, { + /* Tegra30 2 lane root port */ + .vendor = PCI_VENDOR_ID_NVIDIA, .device = 0x0e1d, + .subvendor = PCI_ANY_ID, .subdevice = PCI_ANY_ID + }, { + /* Tegra124 4 lane root port */ + .vendor = PCI_VENDOR_ID_NVIDIA, .device = 0x0e12, + .subvendor = PCI_ANY_ID, .subdevice = PCI_ANY_ID + }, { + /* Tegra124 1 lane root port */ + .vendor = PCI_VENDOR_ID_NVIDIA, .device = 0x0e13, + .subvendor = PCI_ANY_ID, .subdevice = PCI_ANY_ID + }, { + /* sentinel */ + } +}; + /* Tegra PCIE requires relaxed ordering */ static void tegra_pcie_relax_enable(struct pci_dev *dev) { - pcie_capability_set_word(dev, PCI_EXP_DEVCTL, PCI_EXP_DEVCTL_RELAX_EN); + if (pci_match_id(tegra_rootport_ids, pci_get_rootport(dev))) + pcie_capability_set_word(dev, PCI_EXP_DEVCTL, + PCI_EXP_DEVCTL_RELAX_EN); } DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_FINAL(PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, tegra_pcie_relax_enable); -- 2.1.3 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] PCI: tegra: apply relaxed ordering fixup only on Tegra 2014-12-18 19:11 ` Lucas Stach (?) @ 2015-01-09 11:32 ` Thierry Reding 2015-01-09 11:45 ` Lucas Stach -1 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Thierry Reding @ 2015-01-09 11:32 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Lucas Stach; +Cc: Bjorn Helgaas, Alexandre Courbot, linux-tegra, linux-pci [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2781 bytes --] On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 08:11:43PM +0100, Lucas Stach wrote: > The fixup to enable relaxed ordering on all PCI devices was > executed unconditionally if the Tegra PCI host driver was > built into the kernel. This doesn't play nice with a > multiplatform kernel executed on other platforms which > may not need this fixup. > > Make sure to only apply the fixup if the root port is > a Tegra. > > Signed-off-by: Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de> > --- > v2: > - split out PCI hierarchy walk > - separate code from data by moving PCI IDs into own structure > --- > drivers/pci/host/pci-tegra.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- > 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pci-tegra.c b/drivers/pci/host/pci-tegra.c > index 333a57afacc4..b77f417e1a3c 100644 > --- a/drivers/pci/host/pci-tegra.c > +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pci-tegra.c > @@ -635,10 +635,42 @@ DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_EARLY(PCI_VENDOR_ID_NVIDIA, 0x0bf1, tegra_pcie_fixup_class); > DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_EARLY(PCI_VENDOR_ID_NVIDIA, 0x0e1c, tegra_pcie_fixup_class); > DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_EARLY(PCI_VENDOR_ID_NVIDIA, 0x0e1d, tegra_pcie_fixup_class); > > +static const struct pci_device_id tegra_rootport_ids[] = { > + { > + /* Tegra20 4 lane root port */ > + .vendor = PCI_VENDOR_ID_NVIDIA, .device = 0x0bf0, > + .subvendor = PCI_ANY_ID, .subdevice = PCI_ANY_ID > + }, { > + /* Tegra20 2 lane root port */ > + .vendor = PCI_VENDOR_ID_NVIDIA, .device = 0x0bf1, > + .subvendor = PCI_ANY_ID, .subdevice = PCI_ANY_ID The number of lanes is configurable, so I'm not sure exactly what this comment is supposed to indicate. Are you saying that port 0 has 0x0bf0 and port 1 has 0x0bf1 as device IDs. > + }, { > + /* Tegra30 4 lane root port */ > + .vendor = PCI_VENDOR_ID_NVIDIA, .device = 0x0e1c, > + .subvendor = PCI_ANY_ID, .subdevice = PCI_ANY_ID > + }, { > + /* Tegra30 2 lane root port */ > + .vendor = PCI_VENDOR_ID_NVIDIA, .device = 0x0e1d, > + .subvendor = PCI_ANY_ID, .subdevice = PCI_ANY_ID Tegra30 has three ports, so does this second entry (0x0e1d) apply to ports 1 and 2, whereas the previous entry (0x0e1c) applies only to port 0? > + }, { > + /* Tegra124 4 lane root port */ > + .vendor = PCI_VENDOR_ID_NVIDIA, .device = 0x0e12, > + .subvendor = PCI_ANY_ID, .subdevice = PCI_ANY_ID > + }, { > + /* Tegra124 1 lane root port */ > + .vendor = PCI_VENDOR_ID_NVIDIA, .device = 0x0e13, > + .subvendor = PCI_ANY_ID, .subdevice = PCI_ANY_ID Or perhaps what this signifies is that the first port is actually a different device because it supports up to 4 lanes, whereas the others support up to 2 lanes (or only 1 on Tegra124)? In that case: Acked-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com> [-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] PCI: tegra: apply relaxed ordering fixup only on Tegra 2015-01-09 11:32 ` Thierry Reding @ 2015-01-09 11:45 ` Lucas Stach 0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Lucas Stach @ 2015-01-09 11:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Thierry Reding Cc: Bjorn Helgaas, Alexandre Courbot, linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, linux-pci-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA Am Freitag, den 09.01.2015, 12:32 +0100 schrieb Thierry Reding: > On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 08:11:43PM +0100, Lucas Stach wrote: > > The fixup to enable relaxed ordering on all PCI devices was > > executed unconditionally if the Tegra PCI host driver was > > built into the kernel. This doesn't play nice with a > > multiplatform kernel executed on other platforms which > > may not need this fixup. > > > > Make sure to only apply the fixup if the root port is > > a Tegra. > > > > Signed-off-by: Lucas Stach <l.stach-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org> > > --- > > v2: > > - split out PCI hierarchy walk > > - separate code from data by moving PCI IDs into own structure > > --- > > drivers/pci/host/pci-tegra.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- > > 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pci-tegra.c b/drivers/pci/host/pci-tegra.c > > index 333a57afacc4..b77f417e1a3c 100644 > > --- a/drivers/pci/host/pci-tegra.c > > +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pci-tegra.c > > @@ -635,10 +635,42 @@ DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_EARLY(PCI_VENDOR_ID_NVIDIA, 0x0bf1, tegra_pcie_fixup_class); > > DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_EARLY(PCI_VENDOR_ID_NVIDIA, 0x0e1c, tegra_pcie_fixup_class); > > DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_EARLY(PCI_VENDOR_ID_NVIDIA, 0x0e1d, tegra_pcie_fixup_class); > > > > +static const struct pci_device_id tegra_rootport_ids[] = { > > + { > > + /* Tegra20 4 lane root port */ > > + .vendor = PCI_VENDOR_ID_NVIDIA, .device = 0x0bf0, > > + .subvendor = PCI_ANY_ID, .subdevice = PCI_ANY_ID > > + }, { > > + /* Tegra20 2 lane root port */ > > + .vendor = PCI_VENDOR_ID_NVIDIA, .device = 0x0bf1, > > + .subvendor = PCI_ANY_ID, .subdevice = PCI_ANY_ID > > The number of lanes is configurable, so I'm not sure exactly what this > comment is supposed to indicate. Are you saying that port 0 has 0x0bf0 > and port 1 has 0x0bf1 as device IDs. > No, the device ID of the root port is dependent on the number of lanes configured for the specific port. So if you have a 4x1 configuration you will get to see a single device with ID 0x0bf0, in a 2x2 configuration you will see 2 devices with ID 0x0bf1. > > + }, { > > + /* Tegra30 4 lane root port */ > > + .vendor = PCI_VENDOR_ID_NVIDIA, .device = 0x0e1c, > > + .subvendor = PCI_ANY_ID, .subdevice = PCI_ANY_ID > > + }, { > > + /* Tegra30 2 lane root port */ > > + .vendor = PCI_VENDOR_ID_NVIDIA, .device = 0x0e1d, > > + .subvendor = PCI_ANY_ID, .subdevice = PCI_ANY_ID > > Tegra30 has three ports, so does this second entry (0x0e1d) apply to > ports 1 and 2, whereas the previous entry (0x0e1c) applies only to port > 0? > > > + }, { > > + /* Tegra124 4 lane root port */ > > + .vendor = PCI_VENDOR_ID_NVIDIA, .device = 0x0e12, > > + .subvendor = PCI_ANY_ID, .subdevice = PCI_ANY_ID > > + }, { > > + /* Tegra124 1 lane root port */ > > + .vendor = PCI_VENDOR_ID_NVIDIA, .device = 0x0e13, > > + .subvendor = PCI_ANY_ID, .subdevice = PCI_ANY_ID > > Or perhaps what this signifies is that the first port is actually a > different device because it supports up to 4 lanes, whereas the others > support up to 2 lanes (or only 1 on Tegra124)? In that case: > > Acked-by: Thierry Reding <treding-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] PCI: tegra: apply relaxed ordering fixup only on Tegra @ 2015-01-09 11:45 ` Lucas Stach 0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Lucas Stach @ 2015-01-09 11:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Thierry Reding; +Cc: Bjorn Helgaas, Alexandre Courbot, linux-tegra, linux-pci Am Freitag, den 09.01.2015, 12:32 +0100 schrieb Thierry Reding: > On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 08:11:43PM +0100, Lucas Stach wrote: > > The fixup to enable relaxed ordering on all PCI devices was > > executed unconditionally if the Tegra PCI host driver was > > built into the kernel. This doesn't play nice with a > > multiplatform kernel executed on other platforms which > > may not need this fixup. > > > > Make sure to only apply the fixup if the root port is > > a Tegra. > > > > Signed-off-by: Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de> > > --- > > v2: > > - split out PCI hierarchy walk > > - separate code from data by moving PCI IDs into own structure > > --- > > drivers/pci/host/pci-tegra.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- > > 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pci-tegra.c b/drivers/pci/host/pci-tegra.c > > index 333a57afacc4..b77f417e1a3c 100644 > > --- a/drivers/pci/host/pci-tegra.c > > +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pci-tegra.c > > @@ -635,10 +635,42 @@ DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_EARLY(PCI_VENDOR_ID_NVIDIA, 0x0bf1, tegra_pcie_fixup_class); > > DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_EARLY(PCI_VENDOR_ID_NVIDIA, 0x0e1c, tegra_pcie_fixup_class); > > DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_EARLY(PCI_VENDOR_ID_NVIDIA, 0x0e1d, tegra_pcie_fixup_class); > > > > +static const struct pci_device_id tegra_rootport_ids[] = { > > + { > > + /* Tegra20 4 lane root port */ > > + .vendor = PCI_VENDOR_ID_NVIDIA, .device = 0x0bf0, > > + .subvendor = PCI_ANY_ID, .subdevice = PCI_ANY_ID > > + }, { > > + /* Tegra20 2 lane root port */ > > + .vendor = PCI_VENDOR_ID_NVIDIA, .device = 0x0bf1, > > + .subvendor = PCI_ANY_ID, .subdevice = PCI_ANY_ID > > The number of lanes is configurable, so I'm not sure exactly what this > comment is supposed to indicate. Are you saying that port 0 has 0x0bf0 > and port 1 has 0x0bf1 as device IDs. > No, the device ID of the root port is dependent on the number of lanes configured for the specific port. So if you have a 4x1 configuration you will get to see a single device with ID 0x0bf0, in a 2x2 configuration you will see 2 devices with ID 0x0bf1. > > + }, { > > + /* Tegra30 4 lane root port */ > > + .vendor = PCI_VENDOR_ID_NVIDIA, .device = 0x0e1c, > > + .subvendor = PCI_ANY_ID, .subdevice = PCI_ANY_ID > > + }, { > > + /* Tegra30 2 lane root port */ > > + .vendor = PCI_VENDOR_ID_NVIDIA, .device = 0x0e1d, > > + .subvendor = PCI_ANY_ID, .subdevice = PCI_ANY_ID > > Tegra30 has three ports, so does this second entry (0x0e1d) apply to > ports 1 and 2, whereas the previous entry (0x0e1c) applies only to port > 0? > > > + }, { > > + /* Tegra124 4 lane root port */ > > + .vendor = PCI_VENDOR_ID_NVIDIA, .device = 0x0e12, > > + .subvendor = PCI_ANY_ID, .subdevice = PCI_ANY_ID > > + }, { > > + /* Tegra124 1 lane root port */ > > + .vendor = PCI_VENDOR_ID_NVIDIA, .device = 0x0e13, > > + .subvendor = PCI_ANY_ID, .subdevice = PCI_ANY_ID > > Or perhaps what this signifies is that the first port is actually a > different device because it supports up to 4 lanes, whereas the others > support up to 2 lanes (or only 1 on Tegra124)? In that case: > > Acked-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] PCI: tegra: apply relaxed ordering fixup only on Tegra 2015-01-09 11:45 ` Lucas Stach (?) @ 2015-01-09 11:58 ` Thierry Reding -1 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Thierry Reding @ 2015-01-09 11:58 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Lucas Stach; +Cc: Bjorn Helgaas, Alexandre Courbot, linux-tegra, linux-pci [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2426 bytes --] On Fri, Jan 09, 2015 at 12:45:18PM +0100, Lucas Stach wrote: > Am Freitag, den 09.01.2015, 12:32 +0100 schrieb Thierry Reding: > > On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 08:11:43PM +0100, Lucas Stach wrote: > > > The fixup to enable relaxed ordering on all PCI devices was > > > executed unconditionally if the Tegra PCI host driver was > > > built into the kernel. This doesn't play nice with a > > > multiplatform kernel executed on other platforms which > > > may not need this fixup. > > > > > > Make sure to only apply the fixup if the root port is > > > a Tegra. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de> > > > --- > > > v2: > > > - split out PCI hierarchy walk > > > - separate code from data by moving PCI IDs into own structure > > > --- > > > drivers/pci/host/pci-tegra.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- > > > 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pci-tegra.c b/drivers/pci/host/pci-tegra.c > > > index 333a57afacc4..b77f417e1a3c 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/pci/host/pci-tegra.c > > > +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pci-tegra.c > > > @@ -635,10 +635,42 @@ DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_EARLY(PCI_VENDOR_ID_NVIDIA, 0x0bf1, tegra_pcie_fixup_class); > > > DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_EARLY(PCI_VENDOR_ID_NVIDIA, 0x0e1c, tegra_pcie_fixup_class); > > > DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_EARLY(PCI_VENDOR_ID_NVIDIA, 0x0e1d, tegra_pcie_fixup_class); > > > > > > +static const struct pci_device_id tegra_rootport_ids[] = { > > > + { > > > + /* Tegra20 4 lane root port */ > > > + .vendor = PCI_VENDOR_ID_NVIDIA, .device = 0x0bf0, > > > + .subvendor = PCI_ANY_ID, .subdevice = PCI_ANY_ID > > > + }, { > > > + /* Tegra20 2 lane root port */ > > > + .vendor = PCI_VENDOR_ID_NVIDIA, .device = 0x0bf1, > > > + .subvendor = PCI_ANY_ID, .subdevice = PCI_ANY_ID > > > > The number of lanes is configurable, so I'm not sure exactly what this > > comment is supposed to indicate. Are you saying that port 0 has 0x0bf0 > > and port 1 has 0x0bf1 as device IDs. > > > > No, the device ID of the root port is dependent on the number of lanes > configured for the specific port. So if you have a 4x1 configuration you > will get to see a single device with ID 0x0bf0, in a 2x2 configuration > you will see 2 devices with ID 0x0bf1. Okay, that's interesting to know. My ack remains valid in that case: Acked-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com> [-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] PCI: add helper function to find root port for device 2014-12-18 19:11 ` Lucas Stach @ 2015-01-09 11:25 ` Thierry Reding -1 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Thierry Reding @ 2015-01-09 11:25 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Lucas Stach Cc: Bjorn Helgaas, Alexandre Courbot, linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA, linux-pci-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1014 bytes --] On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 08:11:42PM +0100, Lucas Stach wrote: > This adds a simple way to get the root port a given device > is connected to. > > Signed-off-by: Lucas Stach <l.stach-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org> > --- > v2: new patch in v2 > --- > drivers/pci/search.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++ > include/linux/pci.h | 1 + > 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/search.c b/drivers/pci/search.c > index a81f413083e4..c3ae1c52c7cf 100644 > --- a/drivers/pci/search.c > +++ b/drivers/pci/search.c > @@ -385,3 +385,23 @@ int pci_dev_present(const struct pci_device_id *ids) > return 0; > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL(pci_dev_present); > + > +/** > + * pci_get_rootport - Returns the root port the given device is connected to. > + * @dev: PCI device for which the root port should be found. > + */ > +struct pci_dev *pci_get_rootport(struct pci_dev *dev) I think pci_find_root_port() would be slightly more consistent with the existing API. Thierry [-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] PCI: add helper function to find root port for device @ 2015-01-09 11:25 ` Thierry Reding 0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Thierry Reding @ 2015-01-09 11:25 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Lucas Stach; +Cc: Bjorn Helgaas, Alexandre Courbot, linux-tegra, linux-pci [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 989 bytes --] On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 08:11:42PM +0100, Lucas Stach wrote: > This adds a simple way to get the root port a given device > is connected to. > > Signed-off-by: Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de> > --- > v2: new patch in v2 > --- > drivers/pci/search.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++ > include/linux/pci.h | 1 + > 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/search.c b/drivers/pci/search.c > index a81f413083e4..c3ae1c52c7cf 100644 > --- a/drivers/pci/search.c > +++ b/drivers/pci/search.c > @@ -385,3 +385,23 @@ int pci_dev_present(const struct pci_device_id *ids) > return 0; > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL(pci_dev_present); > + > +/** > + * pci_get_rootport - Returns the root port the given device is connected to. > + * @dev: PCI device for which the root port should be found. > + */ > +struct pci_dev *pci_get_rootport(struct pci_dev *dev) I think pci_find_root_port() would be slightly more consistent with the existing API. Thierry [-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-01-09 11:58 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-12-18 19:11 [PATCH v2 1/2] PCI: add helper function to find root port for device Lucas Stach
2014-12-18 19:11 ` Lucas Stach
[not found] ` <1418929903-8506-1-git-send-email-l.stach-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
2014-12-18 19:11 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] PCI: tegra: apply relaxed ordering fixup only on Tegra Lucas Stach
2014-12-18 19:11 ` Lucas Stach
2015-01-09 11:32 ` Thierry Reding
2015-01-09 11:45 ` Lucas Stach
2015-01-09 11:45 ` Lucas Stach
2015-01-09 11:58 ` Thierry Reding
2015-01-09 11:25 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] PCI: add helper function to find root port for device Thierry Reding
2015-01-09 11:25 ` Thierry Reding
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.