[PATCH] video: vt8500lcdfb: remove unneeded continue

[PATCH] video: vt8500lcdfb: remove unneeded continue

[Sudip Mukherjee]

continue is not needed at the end of a for loop

Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip@vectorindia.org>
---
 drivers/video/fbdev/vt8500lcdfb.c | 1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/video/fbdev/vt8500lcdfb.c b/drivers/video/fbdev/vt8500lcdfb.c
index ffaf29e..6716bf5 100644
--- a/drivers/video/fbdev/vt8500lcdfb.c
+++ b/drivers/video/fbdev/vt8500lcdfb.c
@@ -115,7 +115,6 @@ static int vt8500lcd_set_par(struct fb_info *info)
 	for (i = 0; i < 8; i++) {
 		if (bpp_values[i] == info->var.bits_per_pixel) {
 			reg_bpp = i;
-			continue;
 		}
 	}
 
-- 
1.8.1.2

[PATCH] video: vt8500lcdfb: remove unneeded continue

[Sudip Mukherjee]

continue is not needed at the end of a for loop

Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip@vectorindia.org>
---
 drivers/video/fbdev/vt8500lcdfb.c | 1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/video/fbdev/vt8500lcdfb.c b/drivers/video/fbdev/vt8500lcdfb.c
index ffaf29e..6716bf5 100644
--- a/drivers/video/fbdev/vt8500lcdfb.c
+++ b/drivers/video/fbdev/vt8500lcdfb.c
@@ -115,7 +115,6 @@ static int vt8500lcd_set_par(struct fb_info *info)
 	for (i = 0; i < 8; i++) {
 		if (bpp_values[i] = info->var.bits_per_pixel) {
 			reg_bpp = i;
-			continue;
 		}
 	}
 
-- 
1.8.1.2

[PATCH] video: vt8500lcdfb: remove unneeded continue

[Sudip Mukherjee]

continue is not needed at the end of a for loop

Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip@vectorindia.org>
---
 drivers/video/fbdev/vt8500lcdfb.c | 1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/video/fbdev/vt8500lcdfb.c b/drivers/video/fbdev/vt8500lcdfb.c
index ffaf29e..6716bf5 100644
--- a/drivers/video/fbdev/vt8500lcdfb.c
+++ b/drivers/video/fbdev/vt8500lcdfb.c
@@ -115,7 +115,6 @@ static int vt8500lcd_set_par(struct fb_info *info)
 	for (i = 0; i < 8; i++) {
 		if (bpp_values[i] == info->var.bits_per_pixel) {
 			reg_bpp = i;
-			continue;
 		}
 	}
 
-- 
1.8.1.2

[PATCH] fbdev: geocode: remove unneeded NULL check

[Sudip Mukherjee]

the check for info is not required as we are checking it immediately
after gxfb_init_fbinfo() and lxfb_init_fbinfo() and returnig -ENOMEM
if it is NULL.

Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip@vectorindia.org>
---
Hi Tomi,
This patch is similar to my last patch which you have already queued
for 3.20. if you can revert that then i can send you a single patch
with all these three changes together.

 drivers/video/fbdev/geode/gxfb_core.c | 6 ++----
 drivers/video/fbdev/geode/lxfb_core.c | 6 ++----
 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/video/fbdev/geode/gxfb_core.c b/drivers/video/fbdev/geode/gxfb_core.c
index 1790f14..124d7c7 100644
--- a/drivers/video/fbdev/geode/gxfb_core.c
+++ b/drivers/video/fbdev/geode/gxfb_core.c
@@ -444,10 +444,8 @@ static int gxfb_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *id)
 		pci_release_region(pdev, 1);
 	}
 
-	if (info) {
-		fb_dealloc_cmap(&info->cmap);
-		framebuffer_release(info);
-	}
+	fb_dealloc_cmap(&info->cmap);
+	framebuffer_release(info);
 	return ret;
 }
 
diff --git a/drivers/video/fbdev/geode/lxfb_core.c b/drivers/video/fbdev/geode/lxfb_core.c
index 9e1d19d..138da6c 100644
--- a/drivers/video/fbdev/geode/lxfb_core.c
+++ b/drivers/video/fbdev/geode/lxfb_core.c
@@ -577,10 +577,8 @@ err:
 		pci_release_region(pdev, 3);
 	}
 
-	if (info) {
-		fb_dealloc_cmap(&info->cmap);
-		framebuffer_release(info);
-	}
+	fb_dealloc_cmap(&info->cmap);
+	framebuffer_release(info);
 
 	return ret;
 }
-- 
1.8.1.2

[PATCH] fbdev: geocode: remove unneeded NULL check

[Sudip Mukherjee]

the check for info is not required as we are checking it immediately
after gxfb_init_fbinfo() and lxfb_init_fbinfo() and returnig -ENOMEM
if it is NULL.

Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip@vectorindia.org>
---
Hi Tomi,
This patch is similar to my last patch which you have already queued
for 3.20. if you can revert that then i can send you a single patch
with all these three changes together.

 drivers/video/fbdev/geode/gxfb_core.c | 6 ++----
 drivers/video/fbdev/geode/lxfb_core.c | 6 ++----
 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/video/fbdev/geode/gxfb_core.c b/drivers/video/fbdev/geode/gxfb_core.c
index 1790f14..124d7c7 100644
--- a/drivers/video/fbdev/geode/gxfb_core.c
+++ b/drivers/video/fbdev/geode/gxfb_core.c
@@ -444,10 +444,8 @@ static int gxfb_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *id)
 		pci_release_region(pdev, 1);
 	}
 
-	if (info) {
-		fb_dealloc_cmap(&info->cmap);
-		framebuffer_release(info);
-	}
+	fb_dealloc_cmap(&info->cmap);
+	framebuffer_release(info);
 	return ret;
 }
 
diff --git a/drivers/video/fbdev/geode/lxfb_core.c b/drivers/video/fbdev/geode/lxfb_core.c
index 9e1d19d..138da6c 100644
--- a/drivers/video/fbdev/geode/lxfb_core.c
+++ b/drivers/video/fbdev/geode/lxfb_core.c
@@ -577,10 +577,8 @@ err:
 		pci_release_region(pdev, 3);
 	}
 
-	if (info) {
-		fb_dealloc_cmap(&info->cmap);
-		framebuffer_release(info);
-	}
+	fb_dealloc_cmap(&info->cmap);
+	framebuffer_release(info);
 
 	return ret;
 }
-- 
1.8.1.2

Re: [PATCH] fbdev: geocode: remove unneeded NULL check

[Tomi Valkeinen]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 555 bytes --]

On 06/01/15 14:45, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> the check for info is not required as we are checking it immediately
> after gxfb_init_fbinfo() and lxfb_init_fbinfo() and returnig -ENOMEM
> if it is NULL.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip@vectorindia.org>
> ---
> Hi Tomi,
> This patch is similar to my last patch which you have already queued
> for 3.20. if you can revert that then i can send you a single patch
> with all these three changes together.

No need for that, two separate patches is fine. So queued for 3.20.

 Tomi



[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]

Re: [PATCH] fbdev: geocode: remove unneeded NULL check

[Tomi Valkeinen]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 555 bytes --]

On 06/01/15 14:45, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> the check for info is not required as we are checking it immediately
> after gxfb_init_fbinfo() and lxfb_init_fbinfo() and returnig -ENOMEM
> if it is NULL.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip@vectorindia.org>
> ---
> Hi Tomi,
> This patch is similar to my last patch which you have already queued
> for 3.20. if you can revert that then i can send you a single patch
> with all these three changes together.

No need for that, two separate patches is fine. So queued for 3.20.

 Tomi



[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]

Re: [PATCH] fbdev: geocode: remove unneeded NULL check

[deloptes]

Tomi Valkeinen wrote:

> On 06/01/15 14:45, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
>> the check for info is not required as we are checking it immediately
>> after gxfb_init_fbinfo() and lxfb_init_fbinfo() and returnig -ENOMEM
>> if it is NULL.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip@vectorindia.org>
>> ---
>> Hi Tomi,
>> This patch is similar to my last patch which you have already queued
>> for 3.20. if you can revert that then i can send you a single patch
>> with all these three changes together.
> 
> No need for that, two separate patches is fine. So queued for 3.20.
> 
>  Tomi

Hi sorry for off topic question, but how do you run 3.20 on geode ?
I was not able to boot anything since 2.27 as initrd (I guess udev )
corrupts (I guess memory something) and boot hangs.
One suggested to bisect but no one explained how.
I would be glad to get some hint on how to run kernel with udev support on
geode (means >= 2.27)

thanks

Re: [PATCH] fbdev: geocode: remove unneeded NULL check

[One Thousand Gnomes]

On Sun, 01 Feb 2015 06:05:04 +0100
deloptes <deloptes@yahoo.com> wrote:

> Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> 
> > On 06/01/15 14:45, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> >> the check for info is not required as we are checking it immediately
> >> after gxfb_init_fbinfo() and lxfb_init_fbinfo() and returnig -ENOMEM
> >> if it is NULL.
> >> 
> >> Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip@vectorindia.org>
> >> ---
> >> Hi Tomi,
> >> This patch is similar to my last patch which you have already queued
> >> for 3.20. if you can revert that then i can send you a single patch
> >> with all these three changes together.
> > 
> > No need for that, two separate patches is fine. So queued for 3.20.
> > 
> >  Tomi
> 
> Hi sorry for off topic question, but how do you run 3.20 on geode ?
> I was not able to boot anything since 2.27 as initrd (I guess udev )
> corrupts (I guess memory something) and boot hangs.
> One suggested to bisect but no one explained how.
> I would be glad to get some hint on how to run kernel with udev support on
> geode (means >= 2.27)

Tinycore has certainly been reported to run on Geode boxes as of 3.x
kernel series. It might be worth trying a tinycore build on the device
just to see how far it gets on your hardware.

Re: [PATCH] video: vt8500lcdfb: remove unneeded continue

[Sergei Shtylyov]

Hello.

On 01/06/2015 03:45 PM, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:

> continue is not needed at the end of a for loop

> Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip@vectorindia.org>
> ---
>   drivers/video/fbdev/vt8500lcdfb.c | 1 -
>   1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

> diff --git a/drivers/video/fbdev/vt8500lcdfb.c b/drivers/video/fbdev/vt8500lcdfb.c
> index ffaf29e..6716bf5 100644
> --- a/drivers/video/fbdev/vt8500lcdfb.c
> +++ b/drivers/video/fbdev/vt8500lcdfb.c
> @@ -115,7 +115,6 @@ static int vt8500lcd_set_par(struct fb_info *info)
>   	for (i = 0; i < 8; i++) {
>   		if (bpp_values[i] == info->var.bits_per_pixel) {
>   			reg_bpp = i;
> -			continue;
>   		}

    {} are not needed any more either. ;-)

[...]

WBR, Sergei

[PATCH] video: vt8500lcdfb: remove unneeded continue

[Sergei Shtylyov]

Hello.

On 01/06/2015 03:45 PM, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:

> continue is not needed at the end of a for loop

> Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip@vectorindia.org>
> ---
>   drivers/video/fbdev/vt8500lcdfb.c | 1 -
>   1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

> diff --git a/drivers/video/fbdev/vt8500lcdfb.c b/drivers/video/fbdev/vt8500lcdfb.c
> index ffaf29e..6716bf5 100644
> --- a/drivers/video/fbdev/vt8500lcdfb.c
> +++ b/drivers/video/fbdev/vt8500lcdfb.c
> @@ -115,7 +115,6 @@ static int vt8500lcd_set_par(struct fb_info *info)
>   	for (i = 0; i < 8; i++) {
>   		if (bpp_values[i] == info->var.bits_per_pixel) {
>   			reg_bpp = i;
> -			continue;
>   		}

    {} are not needed any more either. ;-)

[...]

WBR, Sergei

Re: [PATCH] video: vt8500lcdfb: remove unneeded continue

[Sergei Shtylyov]

Hello.

On 01/06/2015 03:45 PM, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:

> continue is not needed at the end of a for loop

> Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip@vectorindia.org>
> ---
>   drivers/video/fbdev/vt8500lcdfb.c | 1 -
>   1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

> diff --git a/drivers/video/fbdev/vt8500lcdfb.c b/drivers/video/fbdev/vt8500lcdfb.c
> index ffaf29e..6716bf5 100644
> --- a/drivers/video/fbdev/vt8500lcdfb.c
> +++ b/drivers/video/fbdev/vt8500lcdfb.c
> @@ -115,7 +115,6 @@ static int vt8500lcd_set_par(struct fb_info *info)
>   	for (i = 0; i < 8; i++) {
>   		if (bpp_values[i] = info->var.bits_per_pixel) {
>   			reg_bpp = i;
> -			continue;
>   		}

    {} are not needed any more either. ;-)

[...]

WBR, Sergei

Re: [PATCH] video: vt8500lcdfb: remove unneeded continue

[Sudip Mukherjee]

On Tue, Jan 06, 2015 at 09:31:39PM +0300, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> Hello.
> 
> On 01/06/2015 03:45 PM, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> 
> >continue is not needed at the end of a for loop
> 
> >Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip@vectorindia.org>
> >---
> >  drivers/video/fbdev/vt8500lcdfb.c | 1 -
> >  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> 
> >diff --git a/drivers/video/fbdev/vt8500lcdfb.c b/drivers/video/fbdev/vt8500lcdfb.c
> >index ffaf29e..6716bf5 100644
> >--- a/drivers/video/fbdev/vt8500lcdfb.c
> >+++ b/drivers/video/fbdev/vt8500lcdfb.c
> >@@ -115,7 +115,6 @@ static int vt8500lcd_set_par(struct fb_info *info)
> >  	for (i = 0; i < 8; i++) {
> >  		if (bpp_values[i] == info->var.bits_per_pixel) {
> >  			reg_bpp = i;
> >-			continue;
> >  		}
> 
>    {} are not needed any more either. ;-)

i have noticed that but thought that will be again a different type of change in a single patch.
but now it seems that this patch will introduce a new checkpatch warning, so i should have corrected that in it.
i will send a v2.

thanks
sudip

> 
> [...]
> 
> WBR, Sergei
> 

Re: [PATCH] video: vt8500lcdfb: remove unneeded continue

[Sudip Mukherjee]

On Tue, Jan 06, 2015 at 09:31:39PM +0300, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> Hello.
> 
> On 01/06/2015 03:45 PM, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> 
> >continue is not needed at the end of a for loop
> 
> >Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip@vectorindia.org>
> >---
> >  drivers/video/fbdev/vt8500lcdfb.c | 1 -
> >  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> 
> >diff --git a/drivers/video/fbdev/vt8500lcdfb.c b/drivers/video/fbdev/vt8500lcdfb.c
> >index ffaf29e..6716bf5 100644
> >--- a/drivers/video/fbdev/vt8500lcdfb.c
> >+++ b/drivers/video/fbdev/vt8500lcdfb.c
> >@@ -115,7 +115,6 @@ static int vt8500lcd_set_par(struct fb_info *info)
> >  	for (i = 0; i < 8; i++) {
> >  		if (bpp_values[i] = info->var.bits_per_pixel) {
> >  			reg_bpp = i;
> >-			continue;
> >  		}
> 
>    {} are not needed any more either. ;-)

i have noticed that but thought that will be again a different type of change in a single patch.
but now it seems that this patch will introduce a new checkpatch warning, so i should have corrected that in it.
i will send a v2.

thanks
sudip

> 
> [...]
> 
> WBR, Sergei
> 

[PATCH] video: vt8500lcdfb: remove unneeded continue

[Sudip Mukherjee]

On Tue, Jan 06, 2015 at 09:31:39PM +0300, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> Hello.
> 
> On 01/06/2015 03:45 PM, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> 
> >continue is not needed at the end of a for loop
> 
> >Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip@vectorindia.org>
> >---
> >  drivers/video/fbdev/vt8500lcdfb.c | 1 -
> >  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> 
> >diff --git a/drivers/video/fbdev/vt8500lcdfb.c b/drivers/video/fbdev/vt8500lcdfb.c
> >index ffaf29e..6716bf5 100644
> >--- a/drivers/video/fbdev/vt8500lcdfb.c
> >+++ b/drivers/video/fbdev/vt8500lcdfb.c
> >@@ -115,7 +115,6 @@ static int vt8500lcd_set_par(struct fb_info *info)
> >  	for (i = 0; i < 8; i++) {
> >  		if (bpp_values[i] == info->var.bits_per_pixel) {
> >  			reg_bpp = i;
> >-			continue;
> >  		}
> 
>    {} are not needed any more either. ;-)

i have noticed that but thought that will be again a different type of change in a single patch.
but now it seems that this patch will introduce a new checkpatch warning, so i should have corrected that in it.
i will send a v2.

thanks
sudip

> 
> [...]
> 
> WBR, Sergei
>