* [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 0/6] Exynos5: Fix warnings and enrich clock_get_periph_rate
@ 2015-01-16 5:48 Akshay Saraswat
2015-01-16 5:48 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 1/6] Exynos5: Fix compiler warnings due to clock_get_periph_rate Akshay Saraswat
` (5 more replies)
0 siblings, 6 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: Akshay Saraswat @ 2015-01-16 5:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
This patch series does following changes -
1. Removing compiler warnings for clock_get_periph_rate.
2. Adding and enabling support for Exynos542x in
clock_get_periph_rate.
3. Replacing peripheral specific function calls with
clock_get_periph_rate.
4. Remove code from clocks file which became useless due to
introduction of clock_get_periph_rate.
Changes since v2:
- Patch-1: Added debug message for unknown periph IDs.
- Patch-2: Changed exynos5420 -> exynos542x in comment.
- Patch-3: Fixed enum and soc_get_periph_rate switch.
- Patch-3: Added checks for negative values in soc_get_periph_rate.
- Patch-4: Added checks for negative values in soc_get_periph_rate.
Changes since v1:
- Added 2 new patches.
Akshay Saraswat (6):
Exynos5: Fix compiler warnings due to clock_get_periph_rate
Exynos542x: Move exynos5420_get_pll_clk up and rename
Exynos542x: Add and enable get_periph_rate support
Exynos5: Fix exynos5_get_periph_rate calculations
Exynos5: Use clock_get_periph_rate generic API
Exynos5: Remove dead code for fetching clocks
arch/arm/cpu/armv7/exynos/clock.c | 584 ++++++++++++++++-----------------
arch/arm/include/asm/arch-exynos/clk.h | 3 +
2 files changed, 279 insertions(+), 308 deletions(-)
--
1.9.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 1/6] Exynos5: Fix compiler warnings due to clock_get_periph_rate
2015-01-16 5:48 [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 0/6] Exynos5: Fix warnings and enrich clock_get_periph_rate Akshay Saraswat
@ 2015-01-16 5:48 ` Akshay Saraswat
2015-01-28 4:06 ` Simon Glass
2015-01-16 5:48 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 2/6] Exynos542x: Move exynos5420_get_pll_clk up and rename Akshay Saraswat
` (4 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread
From: Akshay Saraswat @ 2015-01-16 5:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Apparently, members of clk_bit_info array do not map correctly
to the members of enum periph_id. This mapping got broken after
we changed periph_id(s) to reflect interrupt number instead of
their position in a sequence. This patch intends to fix above
mentioned issue.
Signed-off-by: Akshay Saraswat <akshay.s@samsung.com>
---
Changes since v2:
- Added debug message for unknown periph IDs.
Changes since v1:
- Removed exynos5_bit_info array name.
arch/arm/cpu/armv7/exynos/clock.c | 80 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
1 file changed, 49 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/exynos/clock.c b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/exynos/clock.c
index b31c13b..6f20c81 100644
--- a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/exynos/clock.c
+++ b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/exynos/clock.c
@@ -20,42 +20,45 @@
* positions of the peripheral clocks of the src and div registers
*/
struct clk_bit_info {
+ enum periph_id id;
int8_t src_bit;
int8_t div_bit;
int8_t prediv_bit;
};
-/* src_bit div_bit prediv_bit */
+/* periph_id src_bit div_bit prediv_bit */
static struct clk_bit_info clk_bit_info[] = {
- {0, 0, -1},
- {4, 4, -1},
- {8, 8, -1},
- {12, 12, -1},
- {0, 0, 8},
- {4, 16, 24},
- {8, 0, 8},
- {12, 16, 24},
- {-1, -1, -1},
- {16, 0, 8},
- {20, 16, 24},
- {24, 0, 8},
- {0, 0, 4},
- {4, 12, 16},
- {-1, -1, -1},
- {-1, -1, -1},
- {-1, 24, 0},
- {-1, 24, 0},
- {-1, 24, 0},
- {-1, 24, 0},
- {-1, 24, 0},
- {-1, 24, 0},
- {-1, 24, 0},
- {-1, 24, 0},
- {24, 0, -1},
- {24, 0, -1},
- {24, 0, -1},
- {24, 0, -1},
- {24, 0, -1},
+ {PERIPH_ID_UART0, 0, 0, -1},
+ {PERIPH_ID_UART1, 4, 4, -1},
+ {PERIPH_ID_UART2, 8, 8, -1},
+ {PERIPH_ID_UART3, 12, 12, -1},
+ {PERIPH_ID_I2C0, -1, 24, 0},
+ {PERIPH_ID_I2C1, -1, 24, 0},
+ {PERIPH_ID_I2C2, -1, 24, 0},
+ {PERIPH_ID_I2C3, -1, 24, 0},
+ {PERIPH_ID_I2C4, -1, 24, 0},
+ {PERIPH_ID_I2C5, -1, 24, 0},
+ {PERIPH_ID_I2C6, -1, 24, 0},
+ {PERIPH_ID_I2C7, -1, 24, 0},
+ {PERIPH_ID_SPI0, 16, 0, 8},
+ {PERIPH_ID_SPI1, 20, 16, 24},
+ {PERIPH_ID_SPI2, 24, 0, 8},
+ {PERIPH_ID_SDMMC0, 0, 0, 8},
+ {PERIPH_ID_SDMMC1, 4, 16, 24},
+ {PERIPH_ID_SDMMC2, 8, 0, 8},
+ {PERIPH_ID_SDMMC3, 12, 16, 24},
+ {PERIPH_ID_I2S0, 0, 0, 4},
+ {PERIPH_ID_I2S1, 4, 12, 16},
+ {PERIPH_ID_SPI3, 0, 0, 4},
+ {PERIPH_ID_SPI4, 4, 12, 16},
+ {PERIPH_ID_SDMMC4, 16, 0, 8},
+ {PERIPH_ID_PWM0, 24, 0, -1},
+ {PERIPH_ID_PWM1, 24, 0, -1},
+ {PERIPH_ID_PWM2, 24, 0, -1},
+ {PERIPH_ID_PWM3, 24, 0, -1},
+ {PERIPH_ID_PWM4, 24, 0, -1},
+
+ {PERIPH_ID_NONE, -1, -1, -1},
};
/* Epll Clock division values to achive different frequency output */
@@ -260,9 +263,24 @@ static unsigned long exynos5_get_pll_clk(int pllreg)
return fout;
}
+static struct clk_bit_info *get_clk_bit_info(int peripheral)
+{
+ int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; clk_bit_info[i].id != PERIPH_ID_NONE; i++) {
+ if (clk_bit_info[i].id == peripheral)
+ break;
+ }
+
+ if (clk_bit_info[i].id == PERIPH_ID_NONE)
+ debug("ERROR: Peripheral ID %d not found\n", peripheral);
+
+ return &clk_bit_info[i];
+}
+
static unsigned long exynos5_get_periph_rate(int peripheral)
{
- struct clk_bit_info *bit_info = &clk_bit_info[peripheral];
+ struct clk_bit_info *bit_info = get_clk_bit_info(peripheral);
unsigned long sclk, sub_clk;
unsigned int src, div, sub_div;
struct exynos5_clock *clk =
--
1.9.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 2/6] Exynos542x: Move exynos5420_get_pll_clk up and rename
2015-01-16 5:48 [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 0/6] Exynos5: Fix warnings and enrich clock_get_periph_rate Akshay Saraswat
2015-01-16 5:48 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 1/6] Exynos5: Fix compiler warnings due to clock_get_periph_rate Akshay Saraswat
@ 2015-01-16 5:48 ` Akshay Saraswat
2015-01-28 4:06 ` Simon Glass
2015-01-16 5:48 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 3/6] Exynos542x: Add and enable get_periph_rate support Akshay Saraswat
` (3 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread
From: Akshay Saraswat @ 2015-01-16 5:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Moving exynos5420_get_pll_clk function definition up in the
code to keep it together with rest of SoC_get_pll_clk functions.
This makes code more legible and also removes the need of
declaration when called before the position of definition in
code. Also, renaming exynos5420_get_pll_clk to
exynos542x_get_pll_clk because it is being used for both Exynos
5420 and 5800.
Signed-off-by: Akshay Saraswat <akshay.s@samsung.com>
---
Changes since v2:
- Changed exynos5420 -> exynos542x in line 33.
Changes since v1:
- New patch.
arch/arm/cpu/armv7/exynos/clock.c | 82 +++++++++++++++++++--------------------
1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/exynos/clock.c b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/exynos/clock.c
index 6f20c81..5dc9ed2 100644
--- a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/exynos/clock.c
+++ b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/exynos/clock.c
@@ -263,6 +263,46 @@ static unsigned long exynos5_get_pll_clk(int pllreg)
return fout;
}
+/* exynos542x: return pll clock frequency */
+static unsigned long exynos542x_get_pll_clk(int pllreg)
+{
+ struct exynos5420_clock *clk =
+ (struct exynos5420_clock *)samsung_get_base_clock();
+ unsigned long r, k = 0;
+
+ switch (pllreg) {
+ case APLL:
+ r = readl(&clk->apll_con0);
+ break;
+ case MPLL:
+ r = readl(&clk->mpll_con0);
+ break;
+ case EPLL:
+ r = readl(&clk->epll_con0);
+ k = readl(&clk->epll_con1);
+ break;
+ case VPLL:
+ r = readl(&clk->vpll_con0);
+ k = readl(&clk->vpll_con1);
+ break;
+ case BPLL:
+ r = readl(&clk->bpll_con0);
+ break;
+ case RPLL:
+ r = readl(&clk->rpll_con0);
+ k = readl(&clk->rpll_con1);
+ break;
+ case SPLL:
+ r = readl(&clk->spll_con0);
+ break;
+ default:
+ printf("Unsupported PLL (%d)\n", pllreg);
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ return exynos_get_pll_clk(pllreg, r, k);
+}
+
static struct clk_bit_info *get_clk_bit_info(int peripheral)
{
int i;
@@ -382,46 +422,6 @@ unsigned long clock_get_periph_rate(int peripheral)
return 0;
}
-/* exynos5420: return pll clock frequency */
-static unsigned long exynos5420_get_pll_clk(int pllreg)
-{
- struct exynos5420_clock *clk =
- (struct exynos5420_clock *)samsung_get_base_clock();
- unsigned long r, k = 0;
-
- switch (pllreg) {
- case APLL:
- r = readl(&clk->apll_con0);
- break;
- case MPLL:
- r = readl(&clk->mpll_con0);
- break;
- case EPLL:
- r = readl(&clk->epll_con0);
- k = readl(&clk->epll_con1);
- break;
- case VPLL:
- r = readl(&clk->vpll_con0);
- k = readl(&clk->vpll_con1);
- break;
- case BPLL:
- r = readl(&clk->bpll_con0);
- break;
- case RPLL:
- r = readl(&clk->rpll_con0);
- k = readl(&clk->rpll_con1);
- break;
- case SPLL:
- r = readl(&clk->spll_con0);
- break;
- default:
- printf("Unsupported PLL (%d)\n", pllreg);
- return 0;
- }
-
- return exynos_get_pll_clk(pllreg, r, k);
-}
-
/* exynos4: return ARM clock frequency */
static unsigned long exynos4_get_arm_clk(void)
{
@@ -1603,7 +1603,7 @@ unsigned long get_pll_clk(int pllreg)
{
if (cpu_is_exynos5()) {
if (proid_is_exynos5420() || proid_is_exynos5800())
- return exynos5420_get_pll_clk(pllreg);
+ return exynos542x_get_pll_clk(pllreg);
return exynos5_get_pll_clk(pllreg);
} else {
if (proid_is_exynos4412())
--
1.9.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 3/6] Exynos542x: Add and enable get_periph_rate support
2015-01-16 5:48 [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 0/6] Exynos5: Fix warnings and enrich clock_get_periph_rate Akshay Saraswat
2015-01-16 5:48 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 1/6] Exynos5: Fix compiler warnings due to clock_get_periph_rate Akshay Saraswat
2015-01-16 5:48 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 2/6] Exynos542x: Move exynos5420_get_pll_clk up and rename Akshay Saraswat
@ 2015-01-16 5:48 ` Akshay Saraswat
2015-01-16 6:09 ` Joonyoung Shim
2015-01-16 5:48 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 4/6] Exynos5: Fix exynos5_get_periph_rate calculations Akshay Saraswat
` (2 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread
From: Akshay Saraswat @ 2015-01-16 5:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
We planned to fetch peripheral rate through one generic API per
peripheral. These generic peripheral functions are in turn
expected to fetch apt values from a function refactored as
per SoC versions. This patch adds support for fetching peripheral
rates for Exynos5420 and Exynos5800.
Signed-off-by: Akshay Saraswat <akshay.s@samsung.com>
---
Changes since v2:
- Fixed enum and exynos542x_get_periph_rate switch.
- Added checks for negative values in exynos542x_get_periph_rate.
Changes since v1:
- Changes suuport -> support in commit message.
- Removed position change of exynos5420_get_pll_clk.
- Removed #ifdef.
arch/arm/cpu/armv7/exynos/clock.c | 151 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
arch/arm/include/asm/arch-exynos/clk.h | 3 +
2 files changed, 147 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/exynos/clock.c b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/exynos/clock.c
index 5dc9ed2..ee6c13b 100644
--- a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/exynos/clock.c
+++ b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/exynos/clock.c
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ struct clk_bit_info {
};
/* periph_id src_bit div_bit prediv_bit */
-static struct clk_bit_info clk_bit_info[] = {
+static struct clk_bit_info exynos5_bit_info[] = {
{PERIPH_ID_UART0, 0, 0, -1},
{PERIPH_ID_UART1, 4, 4, -1},
{PERIPH_ID_UART2, 8, 8, -1},
@@ -61,6 +61,42 @@ static struct clk_bit_info clk_bit_info[] = {
{PERIPH_ID_NONE, -1, -1, -1},
};
+static struct clk_bit_info exynos542x_bit_info[] = {
+ {PERIPH_ID_UART0, 4, 8, -1},
+ {PERIPH_ID_UART1, 8, 12, -1},
+ {PERIPH_ID_UART2, 12, 16, -1},
+ {PERIPH_ID_UART3, 16, 20, -1},
+ {PERIPH_ID_I2C0, -1, 8, -1},
+ {PERIPH_ID_I2C1, -1, 8, -1},
+ {PERIPH_ID_I2C2, -1, 8, -1},
+ {PERIPH_ID_I2C3, -1, 8, -1},
+ {PERIPH_ID_I2C4, -1, 8, -1},
+ {PERIPH_ID_I2C5, -1, 8, -1},
+ {PERIPH_ID_I2C6, -1, 8, -1},
+ {PERIPH_ID_I2C7, -1, 8, -1},
+ {PERIPH_ID_SPI0, 20, 20, 8},
+ {PERIPH_ID_SPI1, 24, 24, 16},
+ {PERIPH_ID_SPI2, 28, 28, 24},
+ {PERIPH_ID_SDMMC0, 0, 0, -1},
+ {PERIPH_ID_SDMMC1, 4, 10, -1},
+ {PERIPH_ID_SDMMC2, 8, 20, -1},
+ {PERIPH_ID_I2C8, -1, 8, -1},
+ {PERIPH_ID_I2C9, -1, 8, -1},
+ {PERIPH_ID_I2S0, 0, 0, 4},
+ {PERIPH_ID_I2S1, 4, 12, 16},
+ {PERIPH_ID_SPI3, 12, 16, 0},
+ {PERIPH_ID_SPI4, 16, 20, 8},
+ {PERIPH_ID_SDMMC4, 16, 0, 8},
+ {PERIPH_ID_PWM0, 24, 28, -1},
+ {PERIPH_ID_PWM1, 24, 28, -1},
+ {PERIPH_ID_PWM2, 24, 28, -1},
+ {PERIPH_ID_PWM3, 24, 28, -1},
+ {PERIPH_ID_PWM4, 24, 28, -1},
+ {PERIPH_ID_I2C10, -1, 8, -1},
+
+ {PERIPH_ID_NONE, -1, -1, -1},
+};
+
/* Epll Clock division values to achive different frequency output */
static struct set_epll_con_val exynos5_epll_div[] = {
{ 192000000, 0, 48, 3, 1, 0 },
@@ -306,16 +342,22 @@ static unsigned long exynos542x_get_pll_clk(int pllreg)
static struct clk_bit_info *get_clk_bit_info(int peripheral)
{
int i;
+ struct clk_bit_info *info;
- for (i = 0; clk_bit_info[i].id != PERIPH_ID_NONE; i++) {
- if (clk_bit_info[i].id == peripheral)
+ if (proid_is_exynos5420() || proid_is_exynos5800())
+ info = exynos542x_bit_info;
+ else
+ info = exynos5_bit_info;
+
+ for (i = 0; info[i].id != PERIPH_ID_NONE; i++) {
+ if (info[i].id == peripheral)
break;
}
- if (clk_bit_info[i].id == PERIPH_ID_NONE)
+ if (info[i].id == PERIPH_ID_NONE)
debug("ERROR: Peripheral ID %d not found\n", peripheral);
- return &clk_bit_info[i];
+ return &info[i];
}
static unsigned long exynos5_get_periph_rate(int peripheral)
@@ -414,12 +456,107 @@ static unsigned long exynos5_get_periph_rate(int peripheral)
return sub_clk;
}
+static unsigned long exynos542x_get_periph_rate(int peripheral)
+{
+ struct clk_bit_info *bit_info = get_clk_bit_info(peripheral);
+ unsigned long sclk, sub_clk = 0;
+ unsigned int src, div, sub_div = 0;
+ struct exynos5420_clock *clk =
+ (struct exynos5420_clock *)samsung_get_base_clock();
+
+ switch (peripheral) {
+ case PERIPH_ID_UART0:
+ case PERIPH_ID_UART1:
+ case PERIPH_ID_UART2:
+ case PERIPH_ID_UART3:
+ case PERIPH_ID_PWM0:
+ case PERIPH_ID_PWM1:
+ case PERIPH_ID_PWM2:
+ case PERIPH_ID_PWM3:
+ case PERIPH_ID_PWM4:
+ src = readl(&clk->src_peric0);
+ div = readl(&clk->div_peric0);
+ break;
+ case PERIPH_ID_SPI0:
+ case PERIPH_ID_SPI1:
+ case PERIPH_ID_SPI2:
+ src = readl(&clk->src_peric1);
+ div = readl(&clk->div_peric1);
+ sub_div = readl(&clk->div_peric4);
+ break;
+ case PERIPH_ID_SPI3:
+ case PERIPH_ID_SPI4:
+ src = readl(&clk->src_isp);
+ div = readl(&clk->div_isp1);
+ sub_div = readl(&clk->div_isp1);
+ break;
+ case PERIPH_ID_SDMMC0:
+ case PERIPH_ID_SDMMC1:
+ case PERIPH_ID_SDMMC2:
+ case PERIPH_ID_SDMMC3:
+ src = readl(&clk->src_fsys);
+ div = readl(&clk->div_fsys1);
+ break;
+ case PERIPH_ID_I2C0:
+ case PERIPH_ID_I2C1:
+ case PERIPH_ID_I2C2:
+ case PERIPH_ID_I2C3:
+ case PERIPH_ID_I2C4:
+ case PERIPH_ID_I2C5:
+ case PERIPH_ID_I2C6:
+ case PERIPH_ID_I2C7:
+ case PERIPH_ID_I2C8:
+ case PERIPH_ID_I2C9:
+ case PERIPH_ID_I2C10:
+ sclk = exynos542x_get_pll_clk(MPLL);
+ sub_div = ((readl(&clk->div_top1) >> bit_info->div_bit)
+ & 0x7) + 1;
+ return sclk / sub_div;
+ default:
+ debug("%s: invalid peripheral %d", __func__, peripheral);
+ return -1;
+ };
+
+ if (bit_info->src_bit >= 0)
+ src = (src >> bit_info->src_bit) & 0xf;
+
+ switch (src) {
+ case EXYNOS542x_SRC_MPLL:
+ sclk = exynos542x_get_pll_clk(MPLL);
+ break;
+ case EXYNOS542x_SRC_EPLL:
+ sclk = exynos542x_get_pll_clk(EPLL);
+ break;
+ case EXYNOS542x_SRC_RPLL:
+ sclk = exynos542x_get_pll_clk(RPLL);
+ break;
+ default:
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ /* Ratio clock division for this peripheral */
+ if (bit_info->div_bit >= 0) {
+ div = (div >> bit_info->div_bit) & 0xf;
+ sub_clk = sclk / (div + 1);
+ }
+
+ if (bit_info->prediv_bit >= 0) {
+ sub_div = (sub_div >> bit_info->prediv_bit) & 0xff;
+ return sub_clk / (sub_div + 1);
+ }
+
+ return sub_clk;
+}
+
unsigned long clock_get_periph_rate(int peripheral)
{
- if (cpu_is_exynos5())
+ if (cpu_is_exynos5()) {
+ if (proid_is_exynos5420() || proid_is_exynos5800())
+ return exynos542x_get_periph_rate(peripheral);
return exynos5_get_periph_rate(peripheral);
- else
+ } else {
return 0;
+ }
}
/* exynos4: return ARM clock frequency */
diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-exynos/clk.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-exynos/clk.h
index db24dc0..da9bfcd 100644
--- a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-exynos/clk.h
+++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-exynos/clk.h
@@ -26,6 +26,9 @@ enum pll_src_bit {
EXYNOS_SRC_MPLL = 6,
EXYNOS_SRC_EPLL,
EXYNOS_SRC_VPLL,
+ EXYNOS542x_SRC_MPLL = 3,
+ EXYNOS542x_SRC_EPLL = 6,
+ EXYNOS542x_SRC_RPLL,
};
unsigned long get_pll_clk(int pllreg);
--
1.9.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 4/6] Exynos5: Fix exynos5_get_periph_rate calculations
2015-01-16 5:48 [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 0/6] Exynos5: Fix warnings and enrich clock_get_periph_rate Akshay Saraswat
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2015-01-16 5:48 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 3/6] Exynos542x: Add and enable get_periph_rate support Akshay Saraswat
@ 2015-01-16 5:48 ` Akshay Saraswat
2015-01-28 4:09 ` Simon Glass
2015-01-16 5:48 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 5/6] Exynos5: Use clock_get_periph_rate generic API Akshay Saraswat
2015-01-16 5:48 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 6/6] Exynos5: Remove dead code for fetching clocks Akshay Saraswat
5 siblings, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread
From: Akshay Saraswat @ 2015-01-16 5:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
exynos5_get_periph_rate function reads incorrect div for
SDMMC2 & 3. It also reads prediv and does division only for
SDMMC0 & 2 when actually various other peripherals need that.
Adding changes to fix these mistakes in periph rate calculation.
Signed-off-by: Akshay Saraswat <akshay.s@samsung.com>
---
Changes since v2:
- Added checks for negative values in exynos5_get_periph_rate.
Changes since v1:
- New patch.
arch/arm/cpu/armv7/exynos/clock.c | 21 +++++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/exynos/clock.c b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/exynos/clock.c
index ee6c13b..2cd0778 100644
--- a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/exynos/clock.c
+++ b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/exynos/clock.c
@@ -363,8 +363,8 @@ static struct clk_bit_info *get_clk_bit_info(int peripheral)
static unsigned long exynos5_get_periph_rate(int peripheral)
{
struct clk_bit_info *bit_info = get_clk_bit_info(peripheral);
- unsigned long sclk, sub_clk;
- unsigned int src, div, sub_div;
+ unsigned long sclk, sub_clk = 0;
+ unsigned int src, div, sub_div = 0;
struct exynos5_clock *clk =
(struct exynos5_clock *)samsung_get_base_clock();
@@ -403,10 +403,13 @@ static unsigned long exynos5_get_periph_rate(int peripheral)
break;
case PERIPH_ID_SDMMC0:
case PERIPH_ID_SDMMC1:
+ src = readl(&clk->src_fsys);
+ div = readl(&clk->div_fsys1);
+ break;
case PERIPH_ID_SDMMC2:
case PERIPH_ID_SDMMC3:
src = readl(&clk->src_fsys);
- div = readl(&clk->div_fsys1);
+ div = readl(&clk->div_fsys2);
break;
case PERIPH_ID_I2C0:
case PERIPH_ID_I2C1:
@@ -427,7 +430,8 @@ static unsigned long exynos5_get_periph_rate(int peripheral)
return -1;
};
- src = (src >> bit_info->src_bit) & 0xf;
+ if (bit_info->src_bit >= 0)
+ src = (src >> bit_info->src_bit) & 0xf;
switch (src) {
case EXYNOS_SRC_MPLL:
@@ -444,11 +448,12 @@ static unsigned long exynos5_get_periph_rate(int peripheral)
}
/* Ratio clock division for this peripheral */
- sub_div = (div >> bit_info->div_bit) & 0xf;
- sub_clk = sclk / (sub_div + 1);
+ if (bit_info->div_bit >= 0) {
+ sub_div = (div >> bit_info->div_bit) & 0xf;
+ sub_clk = sclk / (sub_div + 1);
+ }
- /* Pre-ratio clock division for SDMMC0 and 2 */
- if (peripheral == PERIPH_ID_SDMMC0 || peripheral == PERIPH_ID_SDMMC2) {
+ if (bit_info->prediv_bit >= 0) {
div = (div >> bit_info->prediv_bit) & 0xff;
return sub_clk / (div + 1);
}
--
1.9.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 5/6] Exynos5: Use clock_get_periph_rate generic API
2015-01-16 5:48 [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 0/6] Exynos5: Fix warnings and enrich clock_get_periph_rate Akshay Saraswat
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2015-01-16 5:48 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 4/6] Exynos5: Fix exynos5_get_periph_rate calculations Akshay Saraswat
@ 2015-01-16 5:48 ` Akshay Saraswat
2015-01-28 4:09 ` Simon Glass
2015-01-16 5:48 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 6/6] Exynos5: Remove dead code for fetching clocks Akshay Saraswat
5 siblings, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread
From: Akshay Saraswat @ 2015-01-16 5:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Replacing SoC and peripheral specific function calls with generic
clock_get_periph_rate calls to get the peripheral clocks.
Signed-off-by: Akshay Saraswat <akshay.s@samsung.com>
---
Changes since v2:
- No change.
Changes since v1:
- Separated exynos5_get_periph_rate fixes into another patch.
arch/arm/cpu/armv7/exynos/clock.c | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 43 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/exynos/clock.c b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/exynos/clock.c
index 2cd0778..31c90b2 100644
--- a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/exynos/clock.c
+++ b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/exynos/clock.c
@@ -1768,7 +1768,7 @@ unsigned long get_arm_clk(void)
unsigned long get_i2c_clk(void)
{
if (cpu_is_exynos5()) {
- return exynos5_get_i2c_clk();
+ return clock_get_periph_rate(PERIPH_ID_I2C0);
} else if (cpu_is_exynos4()) {
return exynos4_get_i2c_clk();
} else {
@@ -1780,8 +1780,6 @@ unsigned long get_i2c_clk(void)
unsigned long get_pwm_clk(void)
{
if (cpu_is_exynos5()) {
- if (proid_is_exynos5420() || proid_is_exynos5800())
- return exynos5420_get_pwm_clk();
return clock_get_periph_rate(PERIPH_ID_PWM0);
} else {
if (proid_is_exynos4412())
@@ -1792,10 +1790,28 @@ unsigned long get_pwm_clk(void)
unsigned long get_uart_clk(int dev_index)
{
+ enum periph_id id;
+
+ switch (dev_index) {
+ case 0:
+ id = PERIPH_ID_UART0;
+ break;
+ case 1:
+ id = PERIPH_ID_UART1;
+ break;
+ case 2:
+ id = PERIPH_ID_UART2;
+ break;
+ case 3:
+ id = PERIPH_ID_UART3;
+ break;
+ default:
+ debug("%s: invalid UART index %d", __func__, dev_index);
+ return -1;
+ }
+
if (cpu_is_exynos5()) {
- if (proid_is_exynos5420() || proid_is_exynos5800())
- return exynos5420_get_uart_clk(dev_index);
- return exynos5_get_uart_clk(dev_index);
+ return clock_get_periph_rate(id);
} else {
if (proid_is_exynos4412())
return exynos4x12_get_uart_clk(dev_index);
@@ -1805,10 +1821,28 @@ unsigned long get_uart_clk(int dev_index)
unsigned long get_mmc_clk(int dev_index)
{
+ enum periph_id id;
+
+ switch (dev_index) {
+ case 0:
+ id = PERIPH_ID_SDMMC0;
+ break;
+ case 1:
+ id = PERIPH_ID_SDMMC1;
+ break;
+ case 2:
+ id = PERIPH_ID_SDMMC2;
+ break;
+ case 3:
+ id = PERIPH_ID_SDMMC3;
+ break;
+ default:
+ debug("%s: invalid MMC index %d", __func__, dev_index);
+ return -1;
+ }
+
if (cpu_is_exynos5()) {
- if (proid_is_exynos5420() || proid_is_exynos5800())
- return exynos5420_get_mmc_clk(dev_index);
- return exynos5_get_mmc_clk(dev_index);
+ return clock_get_periph_rate(id);
} else {
return exynos4_get_mmc_clk(dev_index);
}
--
1.9.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 6/6] Exynos5: Remove dead code for fetching clocks
2015-01-16 5:48 [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 0/6] Exynos5: Fix warnings and enrich clock_get_periph_rate Akshay Saraswat
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2015-01-16 5:48 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 5/6] Exynos5: Use clock_get_periph_rate generic API Akshay Saraswat
@ 2015-01-16 5:48 ` Akshay Saraswat
2015-01-28 4:09 ` Simon Glass
5 siblings, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread
From: Akshay Saraswat @ 2015-01-16 5:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Removing dead code of peripheral and SoC specific function
implementations which was used for fetching peripheral clocks.
This code is not being used anymore because of the introduction
of generic clock_get_periph_rate function.
Signed-off-by: Akshay Saraswat <akshay.s@samsung.com>
---
Changes since v2:
- No change.
Changes since v1:
- No change.
arch/arm/cpu/armv7/exynos/clock.c | 226 --------------------------------------
1 file changed, 226 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/exynos/clock.c b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/exynos/clock.c
index 31c90b2..96066da 100644
--- a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/exynos/clock.c
+++ b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/exynos/clock.c
@@ -687,27 +687,6 @@ static unsigned long exynos4x12_get_pwm_clk(void)
return pclk;
}
-/* exynos5420: return pwm clock frequency */
-static unsigned long exynos5420_get_pwm_clk(void)
-{
- struct exynos5420_clock *clk =
- (struct exynos5420_clock *)samsung_get_base_clock();
- unsigned long pclk, sclk;
- unsigned int ratio;
-
- /*
- * CLK_DIV_PERIC0
- * PWM_RATIO [31:28]
- */
- ratio = readl(&clk->div_peric0);
- ratio = (ratio >> 28) & 0xf;
- sclk = get_pll_clk(MPLL);
-
- pclk = sclk / (ratio + 1);
-
- return pclk;
-}
-
/* exynos4: return uart clock frequency */
static unsigned long exynos4_get_uart_clk(int dev_index)
{
@@ -800,100 +779,6 @@ static unsigned long exynos4x12_get_uart_clk(int dev_index)
return uclk;
}
-/* exynos5: return uart clock frequency */
-static unsigned long exynos5_get_uart_clk(int dev_index)
-{
- struct exynos5_clock *clk =
- (struct exynos5_clock *)samsung_get_base_clock();
- unsigned long uclk, sclk;
- unsigned int sel;
- unsigned int ratio;
-
- /*
- * CLK_SRC_PERIC0
- * UART0_SEL [3:0]
- * UART1_SEL [7:4]
- * UART2_SEL [8:11]
- * UART3_SEL [12:15]
- * UART4_SEL [16:19]
- * UART5_SEL [23:20]
- */
- sel = readl(&clk->src_peric0);
- sel = (sel >> (dev_index << 2)) & 0xf;
-
- if (sel == 0x6)
- sclk = get_pll_clk(MPLL);
- else if (sel == 0x7)
- sclk = get_pll_clk(EPLL);
- else if (sel == 0x8)
- sclk = get_pll_clk(VPLL);
- else
- return 0;
-
- /*
- * CLK_DIV_PERIC0
- * UART0_RATIO [3:0]
- * UART1_RATIO [7:4]
- * UART2_RATIO [8:11]
- * UART3_RATIO [12:15]
- * UART4_RATIO [16:19]
- * UART5_RATIO [23:20]
- */
- ratio = readl(&clk->div_peric0);
- ratio = (ratio >> (dev_index << 2)) & 0xf;
-
- uclk = sclk / (ratio + 1);
-
- return uclk;
-}
-
-/* exynos5420: return uart clock frequency */
-static unsigned long exynos5420_get_uart_clk(int dev_index)
-{
- struct exynos5420_clock *clk =
- (struct exynos5420_clock *)samsung_get_base_clock();
- unsigned long uclk, sclk;
- unsigned int sel;
- unsigned int ratio;
-
- /*
- * CLK_SRC_PERIC0
- * UART0_SEL [6:4]
- * UART1_SEL [10:8]
- * UART2_SEL [14:12]
- * UART3_SEL [18:16]
- * generalised calculation as follows
- * sel = (sel >> ((dev_index * 4) + 4)) & mask;
- */
- sel = readl(&clk->src_peric0);
- sel = (sel >> ((dev_index * 4) + 4)) & 0x7;
-
- if (sel == 0x3)
- sclk = get_pll_clk(MPLL);
- else if (sel == 0x6)
- sclk = get_pll_clk(EPLL);
- else if (sel == 0x7)
- sclk = get_pll_clk(RPLL);
- else
- return 0;
-
- /*
- * CLK_DIV_PERIC0
- * UART0_RATIO [11:8]
- * UART1_RATIO [15:12]
- * UART2_RATIO [19:16]
- * UART3_RATIO [23:20]
- * generalised calculation as follows
- * ratio = (ratio >> ((dev_index * 4) + 8)) & mask;
- */
- ratio = readl(&clk->div_peric0);
- ratio = (ratio >> ((dev_index * 4) + 8)) & 0xf;
-
- uclk = sclk / (ratio + 1);
-
- return uclk;
-}
-
static unsigned long exynos4_get_mmc_clk(int dev_index)
{
struct exynos4_clock *clk =
@@ -943,94 +828,6 @@ static unsigned long exynos4_get_mmc_clk(int dev_index)
return uclk;
}
-static unsigned long exynos5_get_mmc_clk(int dev_index)
-{
- struct exynos5_clock *clk =
- (struct exynos5_clock *)samsung_get_base_clock();
- unsigned long uclk, sclk;
- unsigned int sel, ratio, pre_ratio;
- int shift = 0;
-
- sel = readl(&clk->src_fsys);
- sel = (sel >> (dev_index << 2)) & 0xf;
-
- if (sel == 0x6)
- sclk = get_pll_clk(MPLL);
- else if (sel == 0x7)
- sclk = get_pll_clk(EPLL);
- else if (sel == 0x8)
- sclk = get_pll_clk(VPLL);
- else
- return 0;
-
- switch (dev_index) {
- case 0:
- case 1:
- ratio = readl(&clk->div_fsys1);
- pre_ratio = readl(&clk->div_fsys1);
- break;
- case 2:
- case 3:
- ratio = readl(&clk->div_fsys2);
- pre_ratio = readl(&clk->div_fsys2);
- break;
- default:
- return 0;
- }
-
- if (dev_index == 1 || dev_index == 3)
- shift = 16;
-
- ratio = (ratio >> shift) & 0xf;
- pre_ratio = (pre_ratio >> (shift + 8)) & 0xff;
- uclk = (sclk / (ratio + 1)) / (pre_ratio + 1);
-
- return uclk;
-}
-
-static unsigned long exynos5420_get_mmc_clk(int dev_index)
-{
- struct exynos5420_clock *clk =
- (struct exynos5420_clock *)samsung_get_base_clock();
- unsigned long uclk, sclk;
- unsigned int sel, ratio;
-
- /*
- * CLK_SRC_FSYS
- * MMC0_SEL [10:8]
- * MMC1_SEL [14:12]
- * MMC2_SEL [18:16]
- * generalised calculation as follows
- * sel = (sel >> ((dev_index * 4) + 8)) & mask
- */
- sel = readl(&clk->src_fsys);
- sel = (sel >> ((dev_index * 4) + 8)) & 0x7;
-
- if (sel == 0x3)
- sclk = get_pll_clk(MPLL);
- else if (sel == 0x4)
- sclk = get_pll_clk(SPLL);
- else if (sel == 0x6)
- sclk = get_pll_clk(EPLL);
- else
- return 0;
-
- /*
- * CLK_DIV_FSYS1
- * MMC0_RATIO [9:0]
- * MMC1_RATIO [19:10]
- * MMC2_RATIO [29:20]
- * generalised calculation as follows
- * ratio = (ratio >> (dev_index * 10)) & mask
- */
- ratio = readl(&clk->div_fsys1);
- ratio = (ratio >> (dev_index * 10)) & 0x3ff;
-
- uclk = (sclk / (ratio + 1));
-
- return uclk;
-}
-
/* exynos4: set the mmc clock */
static void exynos4_set_mmc_clk(int dev_index, unsigned int div)
{
@@ -1409,29 +1206,6 @@ void exynos4_set_mipi_clk(void)
clrsetbits_le32(&clk->div_lcd0, 0xf << 16, 0x1 << 16);
}
-/*
- * I2C
- *
- * exynos5: obtaining the I2C clock
- */
-static unsigned long exynos5_get_i2c_clk(void)
-{
- struct exynos5_clock *clk =
- (struct exynos5_clock *)samsung_get_base_clock();
- unsigned long aclk_66, aclk_66_pre, sclk;
- unsigned int ratio;
-
- sclk = get_pll_clk(MPLL);
-
- ratio = (readl(&clk->div_top1)) >> 24;
- ratio &= 0x7;
- aclk_66_pre = sclk / (ratio + 1);
- ratio = readl(&clk->div_top0);
- ratio &= 0x7;
- aclk_66 = aclk_66_pre / (ratio + 1);
- return aclk_66;
-}
-
int exynos5_set_epll_clk(unsigned long rate)
{
unsigned int epll_con, epll_con_k;
--
1.9.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 3/6] Exynos542x: Add and enable get_periph_rate support
2015-01-16 5:48 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 3/6] Exynos542x: Add and enable get_periph_rate support Akshay Saraswat
@ 2015-01-16 6:09 ` Joonyoung Shim
2015-01-28 4:09 ` Simon Glass
0 siblings, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread
From: Joonyoung Shim @ 2015-01-16 6:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Hi,
On 01/16/2015 02:48 PM, Akshay Saraswat wrote:
> We planned to fetch peripheral rate through one generic API per
> peripheral. These generic peripheral functions are in turn
> expected to fetch apt values from a function refactored as
> per SoC versions. This patch adds support for fetching peripheral
> rates for Exynos5420 and Exynos5800.
>
> Signed-off-by: Akshay Saraswat <akshay.s@samsung.com>
> ---
> Changes since v2:
> - Fixed enum and exynos542x_get_periph_rate switch.
> - Added checks for negative values in exynos542x_get_periph_rate.
>
> Changes since v1:
> - Changes suuport -> support in commit message.
> - Removed position change of exynos5420_get_pll_clk.
> - Removed #ifdef.
>
> arch/arm/cpu/armv7/exynos/clock.c | 151 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> arch/arm/include/asm/arch-exynos/clk.h | 3 +
> 2 files changed, 147 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/exynos/clock.c b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/exynos/clock.c
> index 5dc9ed2..ee6c13b 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/exynos/clock.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/exynos/clock.c
> @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ struct clk_bit_info {
> };
>
> /* periph_id src_bit div_bit prediv_bit */
> -static struct clk_bit_info clk_bit_info[] = {
> +static struct clk_bit_info exynos5_bit_info[] = {
> {PERIPH_ID_UART0, 0, 0, -1},
> {PERIPH_ID_UART1, 4, 4, -1},
> {PERIPH_ID_UART2, 8, 8, -1},
> @@ -61,6 +61,42 @@ static struct clk_bit_info clk_bit_info[] = {
> {PERIPH_ID_NONE, -1, -1, -1},
> };
>
> +static struct clk_bit_info exynos542x_bit_info[] = {
> + {PERIPH_ID_UART0, 4, 8, -1},
> + {PERIPH_ID_UART1, 8, 12, -1},
> + {PERIPH_ID_UART2, 12, 16, -1},
> + {PERIPH_ID_UART3, 16, 20, -1},
> + {PERIPH_ID_I2C0, -1, 8, -1},
> + {PERIPH_ID_I2C1, -1, 8, -1},
> + {PERIPH_ID_I2C2, -1, 8, -1},
> + {PERIPH_ID_I2C3, -1, 8, -1},
> + {PERIPH_ID_I2C4, -1, 8, -1},
> + {PERIPH_ID_I2C5, -1, 8, -1},
> + {PERIPH_ID_I2C6, -1, 8, -1},
> + {PERIPH_ID_I2C7, -1, 8, -1},
> + {PERIPH_ID_SPI0, 20, 20, 8},
> + {PERIPH_ID_SPI1, 24, 24, 16},
> + {PERIPH_ID_SPI2, 28, 28, 24},
> + {PERIPH_ID_SDMMC0, 0, 0, -1},
> + {PERIPH_ID_SDMMC1, 4, 10, -1},
> + {PERIPH_ID_SDMMC2, 8, 20, -1},
> + {PERIPH_ID_I2C8, -1, 8, -1},
> + {PERIPH_ID_I2C9, -1, 8, -1},
> + {PERIPH_ID_I2S0, 0, 0, 4},
> + {PERIPH_ID_I2S1, 4, 12, 16},
> + {PERIPH_ID_SPI3, 12, 16, 0},
> + {PERIPH_ID_SPI4, 16, 20, 8},
> + {PERIPH_ID_SDMMC4, 16, 0, 8},
> + {PERIPH_ID_PWM0, 24, 28, -1},
> + {PERIPH_ID_PWM1, 24, 28, -1},
> + {PERIPH_ID_PWM2, 24, 28, -1},
> + {PERIPH_ID_PWM3, 24, 28, -1},
> + {PERIPH_ID_PWM4, 24, 28, -1},
> + {PERIPH_ID_I2C10, -1, 8, -1},
> +
> + {PERIPH_ID_NONE, -1, -1, -1},
> +};
> +
> /* Epll Clock division values to achive different frequency output */
> static struct set_epll_con_val exynos5_epll_div[] = {
> { 192000000, 0, 48, 3, 1, 0 },
> @@ -306,16 +342,22 @@ static unsigned long exynos542x_get_pll_clk(int pllreg)
> static struct clk_bit_info *get_clk_bit_info(int peripheral)
> {
> int i;
> + struct clk_bit_info *info;
>
> - for (i = 0; clk_bit_info[i].id != PERIPH_ID_NONE; i++) {
> - if (clk_bit_info[i].id == peripheral)
> + if (proid_is_exynos5420() || proid_is_exynos5800())
> + info = exynos542x_bit_info;
> + else
> + info = exynos5_bit_info;
> +
> + for (i = 0; info[i].id != PERIPH_ID_NONE; i++) {
> + if (info[i].id == peripheral)
> break;
> }
>
> - if (clk_bit_info[i].id == PERIPH_ID_NONE)
> + if (info[i].id == PERIPH_ID_NONE)
> debug("ERROR: Peripheral ID %d not found\n", peripheral);
>
> - return &clk_bit_info[i];
> + return &info[i];
> }
>
> static unsigned long exynos5_get_periph_rate(int peripheral)
> @@ -414,12 +456,107 @@ static unsigned long exynos5_get_periph_rate(int peripheral)
> return sub_clk;
> }
>
> +static unsigned long exynos542x_get_periph_rate(int peripheral)
> +{
> + struct clk_bit_info *bit_info = get_clk_bit_info(peripheral);
> + unsigned long sclk, sub_clk = 0;
> + unsigned int src, div, sub_div = 0;
> + struct exynos5420_clock *clk =
> + (struct exynos5420_clock *)samsung_get_base_clock();
> +
> + switch (peripheral) {
> + case PERIPH_ID_UART0:
> + case PERIPH_ID_UART1:
> + case PERIPH_ID_UART2:
> + case PERIPH_ID_UART3:
> + case PERIPH_ID_PWM0:
> + case PERIPH_ID_PWM1:
> + case PERIPH_ID_PWM2:
> + case PERIPH_ID_PWM3:
> + case PERIPH_ID_PWM4:
> + src = readl(&clk->src_peric0);
> + div = readl(&clk->div_peric0);
> + break;
> + case PERIPH_ID_SPI0:
> + case PERIPH_ID_SPI1:
> + case PERIPH_ID_SPI2:
> + src = readl(&clk->src_peric1);
> + div = readl(&clk->div_peric1);
> + sub_div = readl(&clk->div_peric4);
> + break;
> + case PERIPH_ID_SPI3:
> + case PERIPH_ID_SPI4:
> + src = readl(&clk->src_isp);
> + div = readl(&clk->div_isp1);
> + sub_div = readl(&clk->div_isp1);
> + break;
> + case PERIPH_ID_SDMMC0:
> + case PERIPH_ID_SDMMC1:
> + case PERIPH_ID_SDMMC2:
> + case PERIPH_ID_SDMMC3:
> + src = readl(&clk->src_fsys);
> + div = readl(&clk->div_fsys1);
> + break;
> + case PERIPH_ID_I2C0:
> + case PERIPH_ID_I2C1:
> + case PERIPH_ID_I2C2:
> + case PERIPH_ID_I2C3:
> + case PERIPH_ID_I2C4:
> + case PERIPH_ID_I2C5:
> + case PERIPH_ID_I2C6:
> + case PERIPH_ID_I2C7:
> + case PERIPH_ID_I2C8:
> + case PERIPH_ID_I2C9:
> + case PERIPH_ID_I2C10:
> + sclk = exynos542x_get_pll_clk(MPLL);
> + sub_div = ((readl(&clk->div_top1) >> bit_info->div_bit)
> + & 0x7) + 1;
> + return sclk / sub_div;
> + default:
> + debug("%s: invalid peripheral %d", __func__, peripheral);
> + return -1;
> + };
> +
> + if (bit_info->src_bit >= 0)
> + src = (src >> bit_info->src_bit) & 0xf;
> +
> + switch (src) {
> + case EXYNOS542x_SRC_MPLL:
> + sclk = exynos542x_get_pll_clk(MPLL);
> + break;
> + case EXYNOS542x_SRC_EPLL:
> + sclk = exynos542x_get_pll_clk(EPLL);
> + break;
> + case EXYNOS542x_SRC_RPLL:
> + sclk = exynos542x_get_pll_clk(RPLL);
> + break;
> + default:
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
Odroid xu3 board uses SPLL as source clock for SDMMCx, please SPLL case.
> + /* Ratio clock division for this peripheral */
> + if (bit_info->div_bit >= 0) {
> + div = (div >> bit_info->div_bit) & 0xf;
Hmm, mask bits are different each peripheral, e.g. SDMMCx needs 0x3ff
mask bits.
> + sub_clk = sclk / (div + 1);
> + }
> +
> + if (bit_info->prediv_bit >= 0) {
> + sub_div = (sub_div >> bit_info->prediv_bit) & 0xff;
> + return sub_clk / (sub_div + 1);
> + }
> +
> + return sub_clk;
> +}
> +
> unsigned long clock_get_periph_rate(int peripheral)
> {
> - if (cpu_is_exynos5())
> + if (cpu_is_exynos5()) {
> + if (proid_is_exynos5420() || proid_is_exynos5800())
> + return exynos542x_get_periph_rate(peripheral);
> return exynos5_get_periph_rate(peripheral);
> - else
> + } else {
> return 0;
> + }
> }
>
> /* exynos4: return ARM clock frequency */
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-exynos/clk.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-exynos/clk.h
> index db24dc0..da9bfcd 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-exynos/clk.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-exynos/clk.h
> @@ -26,6 +26,9 @@ enum pll_src_bit {
> EXYNOS_SRC_MPLL = 6,
> EXYNOS_SRC_EPLL,
> EXYNOS_SRC_VPLL,
> + EXYNOS542x_SRC_MPLL = 3,
> + EXYNOS542x_SRC_EPLL = 6,
> + EXYNOS542x_SRC_RPLL,
Sorry, i want to use EXYNOS542X instead of EXYNOS542x.
Thanks.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 1/6] Exynos5: Fix compiler warnings due to clock_get_periph_rate
2015-01-16 5:48 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 1/6] Exynos5: Fix compiler warnings due to clock_get_periph_rate Akshay Saraswat
@ 2015-01-28 4:06 ` Simon Glass
0 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: Simon Glass @ 2015-01-28 4:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
On 15 January 2015 at 22:48, Akshay Saraswat <akshay.s@samsung.com> wrote:
> Apparently, members of clk_bit_info array do not map correctly
> to the members of enum periph_id. This mapping got broken after
> we changed periph_id(s) to reflect interrupt number instead of
> their position in a sequence. This patch intends to fix above
> mentioned issue.
>
> Signed-off-by: Akshay Saraswat <akshay.s@samsung.com>
> ---
> Changes since v2:
> - Added debug message for unknown periph IDs.
>
> Changes since v1:
> - Removed exynos5_bit_info array name.
>
> arch/arm/cpu/armv7/exynos/clock.c | 80 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
> 1 file changed, 49 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Tested on snow, pit, pi
Tested-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 2/6] Exynos542x: Move exynos5420_get_pll_clk up and rename
2015-01-16 5:48 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 2/6] Exynos542x: Move exynos5420_get_pll_clk up and rename Akshay Saraswat
@ 2015-01-28 4:06 ` Simon Glass
0 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: Simon Glass @ 2015-01-28 4:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
On 15 January 2015 at 22:48, Akshay Saraswat <akshay.s@samsung.com> wrote:
> Moving exynos5420_get_pll_clk function definition up in the
> code to keep it together with rest of SoC_get_pll_clk functions.
> This makes code more legible and also removes the need of
> declaration when called before the position of definition in
> code. Also, renaming exynos5420_get_pll_clk to
> exynos542x_get_pll_clk because it is being used for both Exynos
> 5420 and 5800.
>
> Signed-off-by: Akshay Saraswat <akshay.s@samsung.com>
> ---
> Changes since v2:
> - Changed exynos5420 -> exynos542x in line 33.
>
> Changes since v1:
> - New patch.
>
> arch/arm/cpu/armv7/exynos/clock.c | 82 +++++++++++++++++++--------------------
> 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Tested on snow, pit, pi
Tested-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 3/6] Exynos542x: Add and enable get_periph_rate support
2015-01-16 6:09 ` Joonyoung Shim
@ 2015-01-28 4:09 ` Simon Glass
2015-01-28 4:46 ` Joonyoung Shim
0 siblings, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread
From: Simon Glass @ 2015-01-28 4:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Hi,
On 15 January 2015 at 23:09, Joonyoung Shim <jy0922.shim@samsung.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 01/16/2015 02:48 PM, Akshay Saraswat wrote:
>> We planned to fetch peripheral rate through one generic API per
>> peripheral. These generic peripheral functions are in turn
>> expected to fetch apt values from a function refactored as
>> per SoC versions. This patch adds support for fetching peripheral
>> rates for Exynos5420 and Exynos5800.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Akshay Saraswat <akshay.s@samsung.com>
>> ---
>> Changes since v2:
>> - Fixed enum and exynos542x_get_periph_rate switch.
>> - Added checks for negative values in exynos542x_get_periph_rate.
>>
>> Changes since v1:
>> - Changes suuport -> support in commit message.
>> - Removed position change of exynos5420_get_pll_clk.
>> - Removed #ifdef.
>>
>> arch/arm/cpu/armv7/exynos/clock.c | 151 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>> arch/arm/include/asm/arch-exynos/clk.h | 3 +
>> 2 files changed, 147 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
What else needs to be done to get this applied, please?
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/exynos/clock.c b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/exynos/clock.c
>> index 5dc9ed2..ee6c13b 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/exynos/clock.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/exynos/clock.c
>> @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ struct clk_bit_info {
>> };
>>
>> /* periph_id src_bit div_bit prediv_bit */
>> -static struct clk_bit_info clk_bit_info[] = {
>> +static struct clk_bit_info exynos5_bit_info[] = {
>> {PERIPH_ID_UART0, 0, 0, -1},
>> {PERIPH_ID_UART1, 4, 4, -1},
>> {PERIPH_ID_UART2, 8, 8, -1},
>> @@ -61,6 +61,42 @@ static struct clk_bit_info clk_bit_info[] = {
>> {PERIPH_ID_NONE, -1, -1, -1},
>> };
>>
>> +static struct clk_bit_info exynos542x_bit_info[] = {
>> + {PERIPH_ID_UART0, 4, 8, -1},
>> + {PERIPH_ID_UART1, 8, 12, -1},
>> + {PERIPH_ID_UART2, 12, 16, -1},
>> + {PERIPH_ID_UART3, 16, 20, -1},
>> + {PERIPH_ID_I2C0, -1, 8, -1},
>> + {PERIPH_ID_I2C1, -1, 8, -1},
>> + {PERIPH_ID_I2C2, -1, 8, -1},
>> + {PERIPH_ID_I2C3, -1, 8, -1},
>> + {PERIPH_ID_I2C4, -1, 8, -1},
>> + {PERIPH_ID_I2C5, -1, 8, -1},
>> + {PERIPH_ID_I2C6, -1, 8, -1},
>> + {PERIPH_ID_I2C7, -1, 8, -1},
>> + {PERIPH_ID_SPI0, 20, 20, 8},
>> + {PERIPH_ID_SPI1, 24, 24, 16},
>> + {PERIPH_ID_SPI2, 28, 28, 24},
>> + {PERIPH_ID_SDMMC0, 0, 0, -1},
>> + {PERIPH_ID_SDMMC1, 4, 10, -1},
>> + {PERIPH_ID_SDMMC2, 8, 20, -1},
>> + {PERIPH_ID_I2C8, -1, 8, -1},
>> + {PERIPH_ID_I2C9, -1, 8, -1},
>> + {PERIPH_ID_I2S0, 0, 0, 4},
>> + {PERIPH_ID_I2S1, 4, 12, 16},
>> + {PERIPH_ID_SPI3, 12, 16, 0},
>> + {PERIPH_ID_SPI4, 16, 20, 8},
>> + {PERIPH_ID_SDMMC4, 16, 0, 8},
>> + {PERIPH_ID_PWM0, 24, 28, -1},
>> + {PERIPH_ID_PWM1, 24, 28, -1},
>> + {PERIPH_ID_PWM2, 24, 28, -1},
>> + {PERIPH_ID_PWM3, 24, 28, -1},
>> + {PERIPH_ID_PWM4, 24, 28, -1},
>> + {PERIPH_ID_I2C10, -1, 8, -1},
>> +
>> + {PERIPH_ID_NONE, -1, -1, -1},
>> +};
>> +
>> /* Epll Clock division values to achive different frequency output */
>> static struct set_epll_con_val exynos5_epll_div[] = {
>> { 192000000, 0, 48, 3, 1, 0 },
>> @@ -306,16 +342,22 @@ static unsigned long exynos542x_get_pll_clk(int pllreg)
>> static struct clk_bit_info *get_clk_bit_info(int peripheral)
>> {
>> int i;
>> + struct clk_bit_info *info;
>>
>> - for (i = 0; clk_bit_info[i].id != PERIPH_ID_NONE; i++) {
>> - if (clk_bit_info[i].id == peripheral)
>> + if (proid_is_exynos5420() || proid_is_exynos5800())
>> + info = exynos542x_bit_info;
>> + else
>> + info = exynos5_bit_info;
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; info[i].id != PERIPH_ID_NONE; i++) {
>> + if (info[i].id == peripheral)
>> break;
>> }
>>
>> - if (clk_bit_info[i].id == PERIPH_ID_NONE)
>> + if (info[i].id == PERIPH_ID_NONE)
>> debug("ERROR: Peripheral ID %d not found\n", peripheral);
>>
>> - return &clk_bit_info[i];
>> + return &info[i];
>> }
>>
>> static unsigned long exynos5_get_periph_rate(int peripheral)
>> @@ -414,12 +456,107 @@ static unsigned long exynos5_get_periph_rate(int peripheral)
>> return sub_clk;
>> }
>>
>> +static unsigned long exynos542x_get_periph_rate(int peripheral)
>> +{
>> + struct clk_bit_info *bit_info = get_clk_bit_info(peripheral);
>> + unsigned long sclk, sub_clk = 0;
>> + unsigned int src, div, sub_div = 0;
>> + struct exynos5420_clock *clk =
>> + (struct exynos5420_clock *)samsung_get_base_clock();
>> +
>> + switch (peripheral) {
>> + case PERIPH_ID_UART0:
>> + case PERIPH_ID_UART1:
>> + case PERIPH_ID_UART2:
>> + case PERIPH_ID_UART3:
>> + case PERIPH_ID_PWM0:
>> + case PERIPH_ID_PWM1:
>> + case PERIPH_ID_PWM2:
>> + case PERIPH_ID_PWM3:
>> + case PERIPH_ID_PWM4:
>> + src = readl(&clk->src_peric0);
>> + div = readl(&clk->div_peric0);
>> + break;
>> + case PERIPH_ID_SPI0:
>> + case PERIPH_ID_SPI1:
>> + case PERIPH_ID_SPI2:
>> + src = readl(&clk->src_peric1);
>> + div = readl(&clk->div_peric1);
>> + sub_div = readl(&clk->div_peric4);
>> + break;
>> + case PERIPH_ID_SPI3:
>> + case PERIPH_ID_SPI4:
>> + src = readl(&clk->src_isp);
>> + div = readl(&clk->div_isp1);
>> + sub_div = readl(&clk->div_isp1);
>> + break;
>> + case PERIPH_ID_SDMMC0:
>> + case PERIPH_ID_SDMMC1:
>> + case PERIPH_ID_SDMMC2:
>> + case PERIPH_ID_SDMMC3:
>> + src = readl(&clk->src_fsys);
>> + div = readl(&clk->div_fsys1);
>> + break;
>> + case PERIPH_ID_I2C0:
>> + case PERIPH_ID_I2C1:
>> + case PERIPH_ID_I2C2:
>> + case PERIPH_ID_I2C3:
>> + case PERIPH_ID_I2C4:
>> + case PERIPH_ID_I2C5:
>> + case PERIPH_ID_I2C6:
>> + case PERIPH_ID_I2C7:
>> + case PERIPH_ID_I2C8:
>> + case PERIPH_ID_I2C9:
>> + case PERIPH_ID_I2C10:
>> + sclk = exynos542x_get_pll_clk(MPLL);
>> + sub_div = ((readl(&clk->div_top1) >> bit_info->div_bit)
>> + & 0x7) + 1;
>> + return sclk / sub_div;
>> + default:
>> + debug("%s: invalid peripheral %d", __func__, peripheral);
>> + return -1;
>> + };
>> +
>> + if (bit_info->src_bit >= 0)
>> + src = (src >> bit_info->src_bit) & 0xf;
>> +
>> + switch (src) {
>> + case EXYNOS542x_SRC_MPLL:
>> + sclk = exynos542x_get_pll_clk(MPLL);
>> + break;
>> + case EXYNOS542x_SRC_EPLL:
>> + sclk = exynos542x_get_pll_clk(EPLL);
>> + break;
>> + case EXYNOS542x_SRC_RPLL:
>> + sclk = exynos542x_get_pll_clk(RPLL);
>> + break;
>> + default:
>> + return 0;
>> + }
>> +
>
> Odroid xu3 board uses SPLL as source clock for SDMMCx, please SPLL case.
Perhaps this can be sorted out by the maintainer of that board? I'm
not sure how we can deal with this other than a special case.
Certainly Akshay is not going to know what to do here.
>
>> + /* Ratio clock division for this peripheral */
>> + if (bit_info->div_bit >= 0) {
>> + div = (div >> bit_info->div_bit) & 0xf;
>
> Hmm, mask bits are different each peripheral, e.g. SDMMCx needs 0x3ff
> mask bits.
>
>> + sub_clk = sclk / (div + 1);
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (bit_info->prediv_bit >= 0) {
>> + sub_div = (sub_div >> bit_info->prediv_bit) & 0xff;
>> + return sub_clk / (sub_div + 1);
>> + }
>> +
>> + return sub_clk;
>> +}
>> +
>> unsigned long clock_get_periph_rate(int peripheral)
>> {
>> - if (cpu_is_exynos5())
>> + if (cpu_is_exynos5()) {
>> + if (proid_is_exynos5420() || proid_is_exynos5800())
>> + return exynos542x_get_periph_rate(peripheral);
>> return exynos5_get_periph_rate(peripheral);
>> - else
>> + } else {
>> return 0;
>> + }
>> }
>>
>> /* exynos4: return ARM clock frequency */
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-exynos/clk.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-exynos/clk.h
>> index db24dc0..da9bfcd 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-exynos/clk.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch-exynos/clk.h
>> @@ -26,6 +26,9 @@ enum pll_src_bit {
>> EXYNOS_SRC_MPLL = 6,
>> EXYNOS_SRC_EPLL,
>> EXYNOS_SRC_VPLL,
>> + EXYNOS542x_SRC_MPLL = 3,
>> + EXYNOS542x_SRC_EPLL = 6,
>> + EXYNOS542x_SRC_RPLL,
>
> Sorry, i want to use EXYNOS542X instead of EXYNOS542x.
Agreed, we should use capitals for #defines.
>
> Thanks.
Regards,
Simon
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 4/6] Exynos5: Fix exynos5_get_periph_rate calculations
2015-01-16 5:48 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 4/6] Exynos5: Fix exynos5_get_periph_rate calculations Akshay Saraswat
@ 2015-01-28 4:09 ` Simon Glass
0 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: Simon Glass @ 2015-01-28 4:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
On 15 January 2015 at 22:48, Akshay Saraswat <akshay.s@samsung.com> wrote:
> exynos5_get_periph_rate function reads incorrect div for
> SDMMC2 & 3. It also reads prediv and does division only for
> SDMMC0 & 2 when actually various other peripherals need that.
> Adding changes to fix these mistakes in periph rate calculation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Akshay Saraswat <akshay.s@samsung.com>
> ---
> Changes since v2:
> - Added checks for negative values in exynos5_get_periph_rate.
>
> Changes since v1:
> - New patch.
>
> arch/arm/cpu/armv7/exynos/clock.c | 21 +++++++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Tested on snow, pit, pi
Tested-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 5/6] Exynos5: Use clock_get_periph_rate generic API
2015-01-16 5:48 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 5/6] Exynos5: Use clock_get_periph_rate generic API Akshay Saraswat
@ 2015-01-28 4:09 ` Simon Glass
0 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: Simon Glass @ 2015-01-28 4:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Hi Akshay,
On 15 January 2015 at 22:48, Akshay Saraswat <akshay.s@samsung.com> wrote:
> Replacing SoC and peripheral specific function calls with generic
> clock_get_periph_rate calls to get the peripheral clocks.
>
> Signed-off-by: Akshay Saraswat <akshay.s@samsung.com>
> ---
> Changes since v2:
> - No change.
>
> Changes since v1:
> - Separated exynos5_get_periph_rate fixes into another patch.
>
> arch/arm/cpu/armv7/exynos/clock.c | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 43 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
This commit needs to merge with the next, otherwise you create a build error.
Regards,
Simon
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 6/6] Exynos5: Remove dead code for fetching clocks
2015-01-16 5:48 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 6/6] Exynos5: Remove dead code for fetching clocks Akshay Saraswat
@ 2015-01-28 4:09 ` Simon Glass
0 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: Simon Glass @ 2015-01-28 4:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Hi Akshay,
On 15 January 2015 at 22:48, Akshay Saraswat <akshay.s@samsung.com> wrote:
> Removing dead code of peripheral and SoC specific function
> implementations which was used for fetching peripheral clocks.
> This code is not being used anymore because of the introduction
> of generic clock_get_periph_rate function.
>
> Signed-off-by: Akshay Saraswat <akshay.s@samsung.com>
> ---
> Changes since v2:
> - No change.
>
> Changes since v1:
> - No change.
>
> arch/arm/cpu/armv7/exynos/clock.c | 226 --------------------------------------
> 1 file changed, 226 deletions(-)
>
This commit needs to merge with the previous, otherwise you create a
build error.
Regards,
Simon
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 3/6] Exynos542x: Add and enable get_periph_rate support
2015-01-28 4:09 ` Simon Glass
@ 2015-01-28 4:46 ` Joonyoung Shim
2015-01-28 5:01 ` Simon Glass
0 siblings, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread
From: Joonyoung Shim @ 2015-01-28 4:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Hi Simon,
On 01/28/2015 01:09 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 15 January 2015 at 23:09, Joonyoung Shim <jy0922.shim@samsung.com> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 01/16/2015 02:48 PM, Akshay Saraswat wrote:
>>> We planned to fetch peripheral rate through one generic API per
>>> peripheral. These generic peripheral functions are in turn
>>> expected to fetch apt values from a function refactored as
>>> per SoC versions. This patch adds support for fetching peripheral
>>> rates for Exynos5420 and Exynos5800.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Akshay Saraswat <akshay.s@samsung.com>
>>> ---
>>> Changes since v2:
>>> - Fixed enum and exynos542x_get_periph_rate switch.
>>> - Added checks for negative values in exynos542x_get_periph_rate.
>>>
>>> Changes since v1:
>>> - Changes suuport -> support in commit message.
>>> - Removed position change of exynos5420_get_pll_clk.
>>> - Removed #ifdef.
>>>
>>> arch/arm/cpu/armv7/exynos/clock.c | 151 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>>> arch/arm/include/asm/arch-exynos/clk.h | 3 +
>>> 2 files changed, 147 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> What else needs to be done to get this applied, please?
>
As i said, current this patch has some problem like mask bits, so eMMC
doesn't work normally.
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/exynos/clock.c b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/exynos/clock.c
>>> index 5dc9ed2..ee6c13b 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/exynos/clock.c
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/exynos/clock.c
>>> @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ struct clk_bit_info {
>>> };
>>>
>>> /* periph_id src_bit div_bit prediv_bit */
>>> -static struct clk_bit_info clk_bit_info[] = {
>>> +static struct clk_bit_info exynos5_bit_info[] = {
>>> {PERIPH_ID_UART0, 0, 0, -1},
>>> {PERIPH_ID_UART1, 4, 4, -1},
>>> {PERIPH_ID_UART2, 8, 8, -1},
>>> @@ -61,6 +61,42 @@ static struct clk_bit_info clk_bit_info[] = {
>>> {PERIPH_ID_NONE, -1, -1, -1},
>>> };
>>>
>>> +static struct clk_bit_info exynos542x_bit_info[] = {
>>> + {PERIPH_ID_UART0, 4, 8, -1},
>>> + {PERIPH_ID_UART1, 8, 12, -1},
>>> + {PERIPH_ID_UART2, 12, 16, -1},
>>> + {PERIPH_ID_UART3, 16, 20, -1},
>>> + {PERIPH_ID_I2C0, -1, 8, -1},
>>> + {PERIPH_ID_I2C1, -1, 8, -1},
>>> + {PERIPH_ID_I2C2, -1, 8, -1},
>>> + {PERIPH_ID_I2C3, -1, 8, -1},
>>> + {PERIPH_ID_I2C4, -1, 8, -1},
>>> + {PERIPH_ID_I2C5, -1, 8, -1},
>>> + {PERIPH_ID_I2C6, -1, 8, -1},
>>> + {PERIPH_ID_I2C7, -1, 8, -1},
>>> + {PERIPH_ID_SPI0, 20, 20, 8},
>>> + {PERIPH_ID_SPI1, 24, 24, 16},
>>> + {PERIPH_ID_SPI2, 28, 28, 24},
>>> + {PERIPH_ID_SDMMC0, 0, 0, -1},
>>> + {PERIPH_ID_SDMMC1, 4, 10, -1},
>>> + {PERIPH_ID_SDMMC2, 8, 20, -1},
>>> + {PERIPH_ID_I2C8, -1, 8, -1},
>>> + {PERIPH_ID_I2C9, -1, 8, -1},
>>> + {PERIPH_ID_I2S0, 0, 0, 4},
>>> + {PERIPH_ID_I2S1, 4, 12, 16},
>>> + {PERIPH_ID_SPI3, 12, 16, 0},
>>> + {PERIPH_ID_SPI4, 16, 20, 8},
>>> + {PERIPH_ID_SDMMC4, 16, 0, 8},
>>> + {PERIPH_ID_PWM0, 24, 28, -1},
>>> + {PERIPH_ID_PWM1, 24, 28, -1},
>>> + {PERIPH_ID_PWM2, 24, 28, -1},
>>> + {PERIPH_ID_PWM3, 24, 28, -1},
>>> + {PERIPH_ID_PWM4, 24, 28, -1},
>>> + {PERIPH_ID_I2C10, -1, 8, -1},
>>> +
>>> + {PERIPH_ID_NONE, -1, -1, -1},
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> /* Epll Clock division values to achive different frequency output */
>>> static struct set_epll_con_val exynos5_epll_div[] = {
>>> { 192000000, 0, 48, 3, 1, 0 },
>>> @@ -306,16 +342,22 @@ static unsigned long exynos542x_get_pll_clk(int pllreg)
>>> static struct clk_bit_info *get_clk_bit_info(int peripheral)
>>> {
>>> int i;
>>> + struct clk_bit_info *info;
>>>
>>> - for (i = 0; clk_bit_info[i].id != PERIPH_ID_NONE; i++) {
>>> - if (clk_bit_info[i].id == peripheral)
>>> + if (proid_is_exynos5420() || proid_is_exynos5800())
>>> + info = exynos542x_bit_info;
>>> + else
>>> + info = exynos5_bit_info;
>>> +
>>> + for (i = 0; info[i].id != PERIPH_ID_NONE; i++) {
>>> + if (info[i].id == peripheral)
>>> break;
>>> }
>>>
>>> - if (clk_bit_info[i].id == PERIPH_ID_NONE)
>>> + if (info[i].id == PERIPH_ID_NONE)
>>> debug("ERROR: Peripheral ID %d not found\n", peripheral);
>>>
>>> - return &clk_bit_info[i];
>>> + return &info[i];
>>> }
>>>
>>> static unsigned long exynos5_get_periph_rate(int peripheral)
>>> @@ -414,12 +456,107 @@ static unsigned long exynos5_get_periph_rate(int peripheral)
>>> return sub_clk;
>>> }
>>>
>>> +static unsigned long exynos542x_get_periph_rate(int peripheral)
>>> +{
>>> + struct clk_bit_info *bit_info = get_clk_bit_info(peripheral);
>>> + unsigned long sclk, sub_clk = 0;
>>> + unsigned int src, div, sub_div = 0;
>>> + struct exynos5420_clock *clk =
>>> + (struct exynos5420_clock *)samsung_get_base_clock();
>>> +
>>> + switch (peripheral) {
>>> + case PERIPH_ID_UART0:
>>> + case PERIPH_ID_UART1:
>>> + case PERIPH_ID_UART2:
>>> + case PERIPH_ID_UART3:
>>> + case PERIPH_ID_PWM0:
>>> + case PERIPH_ID_PWM1:
>>> + case PERIPH_ID_PWM2:
>>> + case PERIPH_ID_PWM3:
>>> + case PERIPH_ID_PWM4:
>>> + src = readl(&clk->src_peric0);
>>> + div = readl(&clk->div_peric0);
>>> + break;
>>> + case PERIPH_ID_SPI0:
>>> + case PERIPH_ID_SPI1:
>>> + case PERIPH_ID_SPI2:
>>> + src = readl(&clk->src_peric1);
>>> + div = readl(&clk->div_peric1);
>>> + sub_div = readl(&clk->div_peric4);
>>> + break;
>>> + case PERIPH_ID_SPI3:
>>> + case PERIPH_ID_SPI4:
>>> + src = readl(&clk->src_isp);
>>> + div = readl(&clk->div_isp1);
>>> + sub_div = readl(&clk->div_isp1);
>>> + break;
>>> + case PERIPH_ID_SDMMC0:
>>> + case PERIPH_ID_SDMMC1:
>>> + case PERIPH_ID_SDMMC2:
>>> + case PERIPH_ID_SDMMC3:
>>> + src = readl(&clk->src_fsys);
>>> + div = readl(&clk->div_fsys1);
>>> + break;
>>> + case PERIPH_ID_I2C0:
>>> + case PERIPH_ID_I2C1:
>>> + case PERIPH_ID_I2C2:
>>> + case PERIPH_ID_I2C3:
>>> + case PERIPH_ID_I2C4:
>>> + case PERIPH_ID_I2C5:
>>> + case PERIPH_ID_I2C6:
>>> + case PERIPH_ID_I2C7:
>>> + case PERIPH_ID_I2C8:
>>> + case PERIPH_ID_I2C9:
>>> + case PERIPH_ID_I2C10:
>>> + sclk = exynos542x_get_pll_clk(MPLL);
>>> + sub_div = ((readl(&clk->div_top1) >> bit_info->div_bit)
>>> + & 0x7) + 1;
>>> + return sclk / sub_div;
>>> + default:
>>> + debug("%s: invalid peripheral %d", __func__, peripheral);
>>> + return -1;
>>> + };
>>> +
>>> + if (bit_info->src_bit >= 0)
>>> + src = (src >> bit_info->src_bit) & 0xf;
>>> +
>>> + switch (src) {
>>> + case EXYNOS542x_SRC_MPLL:
>>> + sclk = exynos542x_get_pll_clk(MPLL);
>>> + break;
>>> + case EXYNOS542x_SRC_EPLL:
>>> + sclk = exynos542x_get_pll_clk(EPLL);
>>> + break;
>>> + case EXYNOS542x_SRC_RPLL:
>>> + sclk = exynos542x_get_pll_clk(RPLL);
>>> + break;
>>> + default:
>>> + return 0;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>
>> Odroid xu3 board uses SPLL as source clock for SDMMCx, please SPLL case.
>
> Perhaps this can be sorted out by the maintainer of that board? I'm
> not sure how we can deal with this other than a special case.
> Certainly Akshay is not going to know what to do here.
>
I don't think this is special case, SPLL also can be used as source
clock like MPLL, EPLL and RPLL.
>>
>>> + /* Ratio clock division for this peripheral */
>>> + if (bit_info->div_bit >= 0) {
>>> + div = (div >> bit_info->div_bit) & 0xf;
>>
>> Hmm, mask bits are different each peripheral, e.g. SDMMCx needs 0x3ff
>> mask bits.
>>
Akshay, could you follow up this?
Thanks.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 3/6] Exynos542x: Add and enable get_periph_rate support
2015-01-28 4:46 ` Joonyoung Shim
@ 2015-01-28 5:01 ` Simon Glass
2015-01-28 5:12 ` Joonyoung Shim
0 siblings, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread
From: Simon Glass @ 2015-01-28 5:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Hi Joonyoung,
On 27 January 2015 at 21:46, Joonyoung Shim <jy0922.shim@samsung.com> wrote:
> Hi Simon,
>
> On 01/28/2015 01:09 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 15 January 2015 at 23:09, Joonyoung Shim <jy0922.shim@samsung.com> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On 01/16/2015 02:48 PM, Akshay Saraswat wrote:
>>>> We planned to fetch peripheral rate through one generic API per
>>>> peripheral. These generic peripheral functions are in turn
>>>> expected to fetch apt values from a function refactored as
>>>> per SoC versions. This patch adds support for fetching peripheral
>>>> rates for Exynos5420 and Exynos5800.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Akshay Saraswat <akshay.s@samsung.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> Changes since v2:
>>>> - Fixed enum and exynos542x_get_periph_rate switch.
>>>> - Added checks for negative values in exynos542x_get_periph_rate.
>>>>
>>>> Changes since v1:
>>>> - Changes suuport -> support in commit message.
>>>> - Removed position change of exynos5420_get_pll_clk.
>>>> - Removed #ifdef.
>>>>
>>>> arch/arm/cpu/armv7/exynos/clock.c | 151 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>>>> arch/arm/include/asm/arch-exynos/clk.h | 3 +
>>>> 2 files changed, 147 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>
>> What else needs to be done to get this applied, please?
>>
>
> As i said, current this patch has some problem like mask bits, so eMMC
> doesn't work normally.
>
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/exynos/clock.c b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/exynos/clock.c
>>>> index 5dc9ed2..ee6c13b 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/exynos/clock.c
>>>> +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/exynos/clock.c
>>>> @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ struct clk_bit_info {
>>>> };
>>>>
>>>> /* periph_id src_bit div_bit prediv_bit */
>>>> -static struct clk_bit_info clk_bit_info[] = {
>>>> +static struct clk_bit_info exynos5_bit_info[] = {
>>>> {PERIPH_ID_UART0, 0, 0, -1},
>>>> {PERIPH_ID_UART1, 4, 4, -1},
>>>> {PERIPH_ID_UART2, 8, 8, -1},
>>>> @@ -61,6 +61,42 @@ static struct clk_bit_info clk_bit_info[] = {
>>>> {PERIPH_ID_NONE, -1, -1, -1},
>>>> };
>>>>
>>>> +static struct clk_bit_info exynos542x_bit_info[] = {
>>>> + {PERIPH_ID_UART0, 4, 8, -1},
>>>> + {PERIPH_ID_UART1, 8, 12, -1},
>>>> + {PERIPH_ID_UART2, 12, 16, -1},
>>>> + {PERIPH_ID_UART3, 16, 20, -1},
>>>> + {PERIPH_ID_I2C0, -1, 8, -1},
>>>> + {PERIPH_ID_I2C1, -1, 8, -1},
>>>> + {PERIPH_ID_I2C2, -1, 8, -1},
>>>> + {PERIPH_ID_I2C3, -1, 8, -1},
>>>> + {PERIPH_ID_I2C4, -1, 8, -1},
>>>> + {PERIPH_ID_I2C5, -1, 8, -1},
>>>> + {PERIPH_ID_I2C6, -1, 8, -1},
>>>> + {PERIPH_ID_I2C7, -1, 8, -1},
>>>> + {PERIPH_ID_SPI0, 20, 20, 8},
>>>> + {PERIPH_ID_SPI1, 24, 24, 16},
>>>> + {PERIPH_ID_SPI2, 28, 28, 24},
>>>> + {PERIPH_ID_SDMMC0, 0, 0, -1},
>>>> + {PERIPH_ID_SDMMC1, 4, 10, -1},
>>>> + {PERIPH_ID_SDMMC2, 8, 20, -1},
>>>> + {PERIPH_ID_I2C8, -1, 8, -1},
>>>> + {PERIPH_ID_I2C9, -1, 8, -1},
>>>> + {PERIPH_ID_I2S0, 0, 0, 4},
>>>> + {PERIPH_ID_I2S1, 4, 12, 16},
>>>> + {PERIPH_ID_SPI3, 12, 16, 0},
>>>> + {PERIPH_ID_SPI4, 16, 20, 8},
>>>> + {PERIPH_ID_SDMMC4, 16, 0, 8},
>>>> + {PERIPH_ID_PWM0, 24, 28, -1},
>>>> + {PERIPH_ID_PWM1, 24, 28, -1},
>>>> + {PERIPH_ID_PWM2, 24, 28, -1},
>>>> + {PERIPH_ID_PWM3, 24, 28, -1},
>>>> + {PERIPH_ID_PWM4, 24, 28, -1},
>>>> + {PERIPH_ID_I2C10, -1, 8, -1},
>>>> +
>>>> + {PERIPH_ID_NONE, -1, -1, -1},
>>>> +};
>>>> +
>>>> /* Epll Clock division values to achive different frequency output */
>>>> static struct set_epll_con_val exynos5_epll_div[] = {
>>>> { 192000000, 0, 48, 3, 1, 0 },
>>>> @@ -306,16 +342,22 @@ static unsigned long exynos542x_get_pll_clk(int pllreg)
>>>> static struct clk_bit_info *get_clk_bit_info(int peripheral)
>>>> {
>>>> int i;
>>>> + struct clk_bit_info *info;
>>>>
>>>> - for (i = 0; clk_bit_info[i].id != PERIPH_ID_NONE; i++) {
>>>> - if (clk_bit_info[i].id == peripheral)
>>>> + if (proid_is_exynos5420() || proid_is_exynos5800())
>>>> + info = exynos542x_bit_info;
>>>> + else
>>>> + info = exynos5_bit_info;
>>>> +
>>>> + for (i = 0; info[i].id != PERIPH_ID_NONE; i++) {
>>>> + if (info[i].id == peripheral)
>>>> break;
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> - if (clk_bit_info[i].id == PERIPH_ID_NONE)
>>>> + if (info[i].id == PERIPH_ID_NONE)
>>>> debug("ERROR: Peripheral ID %d not found\n", peripheral);
>>>>
>>>> - return &clk_bit_info[i];
>>>> + return &info[i];
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> static unsigned long exynos5_get_periph_rate(int peripheral)
>>>> @@ -414,12 +456,107 @@ static unsigned long exynos5_get_periph_rate(int peripheral)
>>>> return sub_clk;
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> +static unsigned long exynos542x_get_periph_rate(int peripheral)
>>>> +{
>>>> + struct clk_bit_info *bit_info = get_clk_bit_info(peripheral);
>>>> + unsigned long sclk, sub_clk = 0;
>>>> + unsigned int src, div, sub_div = 0;
>>>> + struct exynos5420_clock *clk =
>>>> + (struct exynos5420_clock *)samsung_get_base_clock();
>>>> +
>>>> + switch (peripheral) {
>>>> + case PERIPH_ID_UART0:
>>>> + case PERIPH_ID_UART1:
>>>> + case PERIPH_ID_UART2:
>>>> + case PERIPH_ID_UART3:
>>>> + case PERIPH_ID_PWM0:
>>>> + case PERIPH_ID_PWM1:
>>>> + case PERIPH_ID_PWM2:
>>>> + case PERIPH_ID_PWM3:
>>>> + case PERIPH_ID_PWM4:
>>>> + src = readl(&clk->src_peric0);
>>>> + div = readl(&clk->div_peric0);
>>>> + break;
>>>> + case PERIPH_ID_SPI0:
>>>> + case PERIPH_ID_SPI1:
>>>> + case PERIPH_ID_SPI2:
>>>> + src = readl(&clk->src_peric1);
>>>> + div = readl(&clk->div_peric1);
>>>> + sub_div = readl(&clk->div_peric4);
>>>> + break;
>>>> + case PERIPH_ID_SPI3:
>>>> + case PERIPH_ID_SPI4:
>>>> + src = readl(&clk->src_isp);
>>>> + div = readl(&clk->div_isp1);
>>>> + sub_div = readl(&clk->div_isp1);
>>>> + break;
>>>> + case PERIPH_ID_SDMMC0:
>>>> + case PERIPH_ID_SDMMC1:
>>>> + case PERIPH_ID_SDMMC2:
>>>> + case PERIPH_ID_SDMMC3:
>>>> + src = readl(&clk->src_fsys);
>>>> + div = readl(&clk->div_fsys1);
>>>> + break;
>>>> + case PERIPH_ID_I2C0:
>>>> + case PERIPH_ID_I2C1:
>>>> + case PERIPH_ID_I2C2:
>>>> + case PERIPH_ID_I2C3:
>>>> + case PERIPH_ID_I2C4:
>>>> + case PERIPH_ID_I2C5:
>>>> + case PERIPH_ID_I2C6:
>>>> + case PERIPH_ID_I2C7:
>>>> + case PERIPH_ID_I2C8:
>>>> + case PERIPH_ID_I2C9:
>>>> + case PERIPH_ID_I2C10:
>>>> + sclk = exynos542x_get_pll_clk(MPLL);
>>>> + sub_div = ((readl(&clk->div_top1) >> bit_info->div_bit)
>>>> + & 0x7) + 1;
>>>> + return sclk / sub_div;
>>>> + default:
>>>> + debug("%s: invalid peripheral %d", __func__, peripheral);
>>>> + return -1;
>>>> + };
>>>> +
>>>> + if (bit_info->src_bit >= 0)
>>>> + src = (src >> bit_info->src_bit) & 0xf;
>>>> +
>>>> + switch (src) {
>>>> + case EXYNOS542x_SRC_MPLL:
>>>> + sclk = exynos542x_get_pll_clk(MPLL);
>>>> + break;
>>>> + case EXYNOS542x_SRC_EPLL:
>>>> + sclk = exynos542x_get_pll_clk(EPLL);
>>>> + break;
>>>> + case EXYNOS542x_SRC_RPLL:
>>>> + sclk = exynos542x_get_pll_clk(RPLL);
>>>> + break;
>>>> + default:
>>>> + return 0;
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>
>>> Odroid xu3 board uses SPLL as source clock for SDMMCx, please SPLL case.
>>
>> Perhaps this can be sorted out by the maintainer of that board? I'm
>> not sure how we can deal with this other than a special case.
>> Certainly Akshay is not going to know what to do here.
>>
>
> I don't think this is special case, SPLL also can be used as source
> clock like MPLL, EPLL and RPLL.
>
>>>
>>>> + /* Ratio clock division for this peripheral */
>>>> + if (bit_info->div_bit >= 0) {
>>>> + div = (div >> bit_info->div_bit) & 0xf;
>>>
>>> Hmm, mask bits are different each peripheral, e.g. SDMMCx needs 0x3ff
>>> mask bits.
>>>
>
> Akshay, could you follow up this?
Can you please issue a Reviewed-by/Tested-by for those patches you are
happy with?
I saw a flurry of comments but I'm not sure if you are now happy with
them or not.
Regards,
Simon
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 3/6] Exynos542x: Add and enable get_periph_rate support
2015-01-28 5:01 ` Simon Glass
@ 2015-01-28 5:12 ` Joonyoung Shim
2015-01-28 5:15 ` Simon Glass
0 siblings, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread
From: Joonyoung Shim @ 2015-01-28 5:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Hi Simon,
On 01/28/2015 02:01 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Joonyoung,
>
> On 27 January 2015 at 21:46, Joonyoung Shim <jy0922.shim@samsung.com> wrote:
>> Hi Simon,
>>
>> On 01/28/2015 01:09 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On 15 January 2015 at 23:09, Joonyoung Shim <jy0922.shim@samsung.com> wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> On 01/16/2015 02:48 PM, Akshay Saraswat wrote:
>>>>> We planned to fetch peripheral rate through one generic API per
>>>>> peripheral. These generic peripheral functions are in turn
>>>>> expected to fetch apt values from a function refactored as
>>>>> per SoC versions. This patch adds support for fetching peripheral
>>>>> rates for Exynos5420 and Exynos5800.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Akshay Saraswat <akshay.s@samsung.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> Changes since v2:
>>>>> - Fixed enum and exynos542x_get_periph_rate switch.
>>>>> - Added checks for negative values in exynos542x_get_periph_rate.
>>>>>
>>>>> Changes since v1:
>>>>> - Changes suuport -> support in commit message.
>>>>> - Removed position change of exynos5420_get_pll_clk.
>>>>> - Removed #ifdef.
>>>>>
>>>>> arch/arm/cpu/armv7/exynos/clock.c | 151 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>>>>> arch/arm/include/asm/arch-exynos/clk.h | 3 +
>>>>> 2 files changed, 147 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> What else needs to be done to get this applied, please?
>>>
>>
>> As i said, current this patch has some problem like mask bits, so eMMC
>> doesn't work normally.
>>
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/exynos/clock.c b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/exynos/clock.c
>>>>> index 5dc9ed2..ee6c13b 100644
>>>>> --- a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/exynos/clock.c
>>>>> +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/exynos/clock.c
>>>>> @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ struct clk_bit_info {
>>>>> };
>>>>>
>>>>> /* periph_id src_bit div_bit prediv_bit */
>>>>> -static struct clk_bit_info clk_bit_info[] = {
>>>>> +static struct clk_bit_info exynos5_bit_info[] = {
>>>>> {PERIPH_ID_UART0, 0, 0, -1},
>>>>> {PERIPH_ID_UART1, 4, 4, -1},
>>>>> {PERIPH_ID_UART2, 8, 8, -1},
>>>>> @@ -61,6 +61,42 @@ static struct clk_bit_info clk_bit_info[] = {
>>>>> {PERIPH_ID_NONE, -1, -1, -1},
>>>>> };
>>>>>
>>>>> +static struct clk_bit_info exynos542x_bit_info[] = {
>>>>> + {PERIPH_ID_UART0, 4, 8, -1},
>>>>> + {PERIPH_ID_UART1, 8, 12, -1},
>>>>> + {PERIPH_ID_UART2, 12, 16, -1},
>>>>> + {PERIPH_ID_UART3, 16, 20, -1},
>>>>> + {PERIPH_ID_I2C0, -1, 8, -1},
>>>>> + {PERIPH_ID_I2C1, -1, 8, -1},
>>>>> + {PERIPH_ID_I2C2, -1, 8, -1},
>>>>> + {PERIPH_ID_I2C3, -1, 8, -1},
>>>>> + {PERIPH_ID_I2C4, -1, 8, -1},
>>>>> + {PERIPH_ID_I2C5, -1, 8, -1},
>>>>> + {PERIPH_ID_I2C6, -1, 8, -1},
>>>>> + {PERIPH_ID_I2C7, -1, 8, -1},
>>>>> + {PERIPH_ID_SPI0, 20, 20, 8},
>>>>> + {PERIPH_ID_SPI1, 24, 24, 16},
>>>>> + {PERIPH_ID_SPI2, 28, 28, 24},
>>>>> + {PERIPH_ID_SDMMC0, 0, 0, -1},
>>>>> + {PERIPH_ID_SDMMC1, 4, 10, -1},
>>>>> + {PERIPH_ID_SDMMC2, 8, 20, -1},
>>>>> + {PERIPH_ID_I2C8, -1, 8, -1},
>>>>> + {PERIPH_ID_I2C9, -1, 8, -1},
>>>>> + {PERIPH_ID_I2S0, 0, 0, 4},
>>>>> + {PERIPH_ID_I2S1, 4, 12, 16},
>>>>> + {PERIPH_ID_SPI3, 12, 16, 0},
>>>>> + {PERIPH_ID_SPI4, 16, 20, 8},
>>>>> + {PERIPH_ID_SDMMC4, 16, 0, 8},
>>>>> + {PERIPH_ID_PWM0, 24, 28, -1},
>>>>> + {PERIPH_ID_PWM1, 24, 28, -1},
>>>>> + {PERIPH_ID_PWM2, 24, 28, -1},
>>>>> + {PERIPH_ID_PWM3, 24, 28, -1},
>>>>> + {PERIPH_ID_PWM4, 24, 28, -1},
>>>>> + {PERIPH_ID_I2C10, -1, 8, -1},
>>>>> +
>>>>> + {PERIPH_ID_NONE, -1, -1, -1},
>>>>> +};
>>>>> +
>>>>> /* Epll Clock division values to achive different frequency output */
>>>>> static struct set_epll_con_val exynos5_epll_div[] = {
>>>>> { 192000000, 0, 48, 3, 1, 0 },
>>>>> @@ -306,16 +342,22 @@ static unsigned long exynos542x_get_pll_clk(int pllreg)
>>>>> static struct clk_bit_info *get_clk_bit_info(int peripheral)
>>>>> {
>>>>> int i;
>>>>> + struct clk_bit_info *info;
>>>>>
>>>>> - for (i = 0; clk_bit_info[i].id != PERIPH_ID_NONE; i++) {
>>>>> - if (clk_bit_info[i].id == peripheral)
>>>>> + if (proid_is_exynos5420() || proid_is_exynos5800())
>>>>> + info = exynos542x_bit_info;
>>>>> + else
>>>>> + info = exynos5_bit_info;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + for (i = 0; info[i].id != PERIPH_ID_NONE; i++) {
>>>>> + if (info[i].id == peripheral)
>>>>> break;
>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>>> - if (clk_bit_info[i].id == PERIPH_ID_NONE)
>>>>> + if (info[i].id == PERIPH_ID_NONE)
>>>>> debug("ERROR: Peripheral ID %d not found\n", peripheral);
>>>>>
>>>>> - return &clk_bit_info[i];
>>>>> + return &info[i];
>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>>> static unsigned long exynos5_get_periph_rate(int peripheral)
>>>>> @@ -414,12 +456,107 @@ static unsigned long exynos5_get_periph_rate(int peripheral)
>>>>> return sub_clk;
>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>>> +static unsigned long exynos542x_get_periph_rate(int peripheral)
>>>>> +{
>>>>> + struct clk_bit_info *bit_info = get_clk_bit_info(peripheral);
>>>>> + unsigned long sclk, sub_clk = 0;
>>>>> + unsigned int src, div, sub_div = 0;
>>>>> + struct exynos5420_clock *clk =
>>>>> + (struct exynos5420_clock *)samsung_get_base_clock();
>>>>> +
>>>>> + switch (peripheral) {
>>>>> + case PERIPH_ID_UART0:
>>>>> + case PERIPH_ID_UART1:
>>>>> + case PERIPH_ID_UART2:
>>>>> + case PERIPH_ID_UART3:
>>>>> + case PERIPH_ID_PWM0:
>>>>> + case PERIPH_ID_PWM1:
>>>>> + case PERIPH_ID_PWM2:
>>>>> + case PERIPH_ID_PWM3:
>>>>> + case PERIPH_ID_PWM4:
>>>>> + src = readl(&clk->src_peric0);
>>>>> + div = readl(&clk->div_peric0);
>>>>> + break;
>>>>> + case PERIPH_ID_SPI0:
>>>>> + case PERIPH_ID_SPI1:
>>>>> + case PERIPH_ID_SPI2:
>>>>> + src = readl(&clk->src_peric1);
>>>>> + div = readl(&clk->div_peric1);
>>>>> + sub_div = readl(&clk->div_peric4);
>>>>> + break;
>>>>> + case PERIPH_ID_SPI3:
>>>>> + case PERIPH_ID_SPI4:
>>>>> + src = readl(&clk->src_isp);
>>>>> + div = readl(&clk->div_isp1);
>>>>> + sub_div = readl(&clk->div_isp1);
>>>>> + break;
>>>>> + case PERIPH_ID_SDMMC0:
>>>>> + case PERIPH_ID_SDMMC1:
>>>>> + case PERIPH_ID_SDMMC2:
>>>>> + case PERIPH_ID_SDMMC3:
>>>>> + src = readl(&clk->src_fsys);
>>>>> + div = readl(&clk->div_fsys1);
>>>>> + break;
>>>>> + case PERIPH_ID_I2C0:
>>>>> + case PERIPH_ID_I2C1:
>>>>> + case PERIPH_ID_I2C2:
>>>>> + case PERIPH_ID_I2C3:
>>>>> + case PERIPH_ID_I2C4:
>>>>> + case PERIPH_ID_I2C5:
>>>>> + case PERIPH_ID_I2C6:
>>>>> + case PERIPH_ID_I2C7:
>>>>> + case PERIPH_ID_I2C8:
>>>>> + case PERIPH_ID_I2C9:
>>>>> + case PERIPH_ID_I2C10:
>>>>> + sclk = exynos542x_get_pll_clk(MPLL);
>>>>> + sub_div = ((readl(&clk->div_top1) >> bit_info->div_bit)
>>>>> + & 0x7) + 1;
>>>>> + return sclk / sub_div;
>>>>> + default:
>>>>> + debug("%s: invalid peripheral %d", __func__, peripheral);
>>>>> + return -1;
>>>>> + };
>>>>> +
>>>>> + if (bit_info->src_bit >= 0)
>>>>> + src = (src >> bit_info->src_bit) & 0xf;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + switch (src) {
>>>>> + case EXYNOS542x_SRC_MPLL:
>>>>> + sclk = exynos542x_get_pll_clk(MPLL);
>>>>> + break;
>>>>> + case EXYNOS542x_SRC_EPLL:
>>>>> + sclk = exynos542x_get_pll_clk(EPLL);
>>>>> + break;
>>>>> + case EXYNOS542x_SRC_RPLL:
>>>>> + sclk = exynos542x_get_pll_clk(RPLL);
>>>>> + break;
>>>>> + default:
>>>>> + return 0;
>>>>> + }
>>>>> +
>>>>
>>>> Odroid xu3 board uses SPLL as source clock for SDMMCx, please SPLL case.
>>>
>>> Perhaps this can be sorted out by the maintainer of that board? I'm
>>> not sure how we can deal with this other than a special case.
>>> Certainly Akshay is not going to know what to do here.
>>>
>>
>> I don't think this is special case, SPLL also can be used as source
>> clock like MPLL, EPLL and RPLL.
>>
>>>>
>>>>> + /* Ratio clock division for this peripheral */
>>>>> + if (bit_info->div_bit >= 0) {
>>>>> + div = (div >> bit_info->div_bit) & 0xf;
>>>>
>>>> Hmm, mask bits are different each peripheral, e.g. SDMMCx needs 0x3ff
>>>> mask bits.
>>>>
>>
>> Akshay, could you follow up this?
>
> Can you please issue a Reviewed-by/Tested-by for those patches you are
> happy with?
>
Sure, i will reply Reviewed-by or Tested-by if he solves issues.
Thanks.
> I saw a flurry of comments but I'm not sure if you are now happy with
> them or not.
>
> Regards,
> Simon
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 3/6] Exynos542x: Add and enable get_periph_rate support
2015-01-28 5:12 ` Joonyoung Shim
@ 2015-01-28 5:15 ` Simon Glass
2015-01-28 5:55 ` Joonyoung Shim
0 siblings, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread
From: Simon Glass @ 2015-01-28 5:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Hi Joonyoung,
On 27 January 2015 at 22:12, Joonyoung Shim <jy0922.shim@samsung.com> wrote:
> Hi Simon,
>
> On 01/28/2015 02:01 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
>> Hi Joonyoung,
>>
>> On 27 January 2015 at 21:46, Joonyoung Shim <jy0922.shim@samsung.com> wrote:
>>> Hi Simon,
>>>
>>> On 01/28/2015 01:09 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> On 15 January 2015 at 23:09, Joonyoung Shim <jy0922.shim@samsung.com> wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> On 01/16/2015 02:48 PM, Akshay Saraswat wrote:
>>>>>> We planned to fetch peripheral rate through one generic API per
>>>>>> peripheral. These generic peripheral functions are in turn
>>>>>> expected to fetch apt values from a function refactored as
>>>>>> per SoC versions. This patch adds support for fetching peripheral
>>>>>> rates for Exynos5420 and Exynos5800.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Akshay Saraswat <akshay.s@samsung.com>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> Changes since v2:
>>>>>> - Fixed enum and exynos542x_get_periph_rate switch.
>>>>>> - Added checks for negative values in exynos542x_get_periph_rate.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Changes since v1:
>>>>>> - Changes suuport -> support in commit message.
>>>>>> - Removed position change of exynos5420_get_pll_clk.
>>>>>> - Removed #ifdef.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> arch/arm/cpu/armv7/exynos/clock.c | 151 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>>>>>> arch/arm/include/asm/arch-exynos/clk.h | 3 +
>>>>>> 2 files changed, 147 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> What else needs to be done to get this applied, please?
>>>>
>>>
>>> As i said, current this patch has some problem like mask bits, so eMMC
>>> doesn't work normally.
>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/exynos/clock.c b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/exynos/clock.c
>>>>>> index 5dc9ed2..ee6c13b 100644
>>>>>> --- a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/exynos/clock.c
>>>>>> +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/exynos/clock.c
>>>>>> @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ struct clk_bit_info {
>>>>>> };
>>>>>>
>>>>>> /* periph_id src_bit div_bit prediv_bit */
>>>>>> -static struct clk_bit_info clk_bit_info[] = {
>>>>>> +static struct clk_bit_info exynos5_bit_info[] = {
>>>>>> {PERIPH_ID_UART0, 0, 0, -1},
>>>>>> {PERIPH_ID_UART1, 4, 4, -1},
>>>>>> {PERIPH_ID_UART2, 8, 8, -1},
>>>>>> @@ -61,6 +61,42 @@ static struct clk_bit_info clk_bit_info[] = {
>>>>>> {PERIPH_ID_NONE, -1, -1, -1},
>>>>>> };
>>>>>>
>>>>>> +static struct clk_bit_info exynos542x_bit_info[] = {
>>>>>> + {PERIPH_ID_UART0, 4, 8, -1},
>>>>>> + {PERIPH_ID_UART1, 8, 12, -1},
>>>>>> + {PERIPH_ID_UART2, 12, 16, -1},
>>>>>> + {PERIPH_ID_UART3, 16, 20, -1},
>>>>>> + {PERIPH_ID_I2C0, -1, 8, -1},
>>>>>> + {PERIPH_ID_I2C1, -1, 8, -1},
>>>>>> + {PERIPH_ID_I2C2, -1, 8, -1},
>>>>>> + {PERIPH_ID_I2C3, -1, 8, -1},
>>>>>> + {PERIPH_ID_I2C4, -1, 8, -1},
>>>>>> + {PERIPH_ID_I2C5, -1, 8, -1},
>>>>>> + {PERIPH_ID_I2C6, -1, 8, -1},
>>>>>> + {PERIPH_ID_I2C7, -1, 8, -1},
>>>>>> + {PERIPH_ID_SPI0, 20, 20, 8},
>>>>>> + {PERIPH_ID_SPI1, 24, 24, 16},
>>>>>> + {PERIPH_ID_SPI2, 28, 28, 24},
>>>>>> + {PERIPH_ID_SDMMC0, 0, 0, -1},
>>>>>> + {PERIPH_ID_SDMMC1, 4, 10, -1},
>>>>>> + {PERIPH_ID_SDMMC2, 8, 20, -1},
>>>>>> + {PERIPH_ID_I2C8, -1, 8, -1},
>>>>>> + {PERIPH_ID_I2C9, -1, 8, -1},
>>>>>> + {PERIPH_ID_I2S0, 0, 0, 4},
>>>>>> + {PERIPH_ID_I2S1, 4, 12, 16},
>>>>>> + {PERIPH_ID_SPI3, 12, 16, 0},
>>>>>> + {PERIPH_ID_SPI4, 16, 20, 8},
>>>>>> + {PERIPH_ID_SDMMC4, 16, 0, 8},
>>>>>> + {PERIPH_ID_PWM0, 24, 28, -1},
>>>>>> + {PERIPH_ID_PWM1, 24, 28, -1},
>>>>>> + {PERIPH_ID_PWM2, 24, 28, -1},
>>>>>> + {PERIPH_ID_PWM3, 24, 28, -1},
>>>>>> + {PERIPH_ID_PWM4, 24, 28, -1},
>>>>>> + {PERIPH_ID_I2C10, -1, 8, -1},
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + {PERIPH_ID_NONE, -1, -1, -1},
>>>>>> +};
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> /* Epll Clock division values to achive different frequency output */
>>>>>> static struct set_epll_con_val exynos5_epll_div[] = {
>>>>>> { 192000000, 0, 48, 3, 1, 0 },
>>>>>> @@ -306,16 +342,22 @@ static unsigned long exynos542x_get_pll_clk(int pllreg)
>>>>>> static struct clk_bit_info *get_clk_bit_info(int peripheral)
>>>>>> {
>>>>>> int i;
>>>>>> + struct clk_bit_info *info;
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - for (i = 0; clk_bit_info[i].id != PERIPH_ID_NONE; i++) {
>>>>>> - if (clk_bit_info[i].id == peripheral)
>>>>>> + if (proid_is_exynos5420() || proid_is_exynos5800())
>>>>>> + info = exynos542x_bit_info;
>>>>>> + else
>>>>>> + info = exynos5_bit_info;
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + for (i = 0; info[i].id != PERIPH_ID_NONE; i++) {
>>>>>> + if (info[i].id == peripheral)
>>>>>> break;
>>>>>> }
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - if (clk_bit_info[i].id == PERIPH_ID_NONE)
>>>>>> + if (info[i].id == PERIPH_ID_NONE)
>>>>>> debug("ERROR: Peripheral ID %d not found\n", peripheral);
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - return &clk_bit_info[i];
>>>>>> + return &info[i];
>>>>>> }
>>>>>>
>>>>>> static unsigned long exynos5_get_periph_rate(int peripheral)
>>>>>> @@ -414,12 +456,107 @@ static unsigned long exynos5_get_periph_rate(int peripheral)
>>>>>> return sub_clk;
>>>>>> }
>>>>>>
>>>>>> +static unsigned long exynos542x_get_periph_rate(int peripheral)
>>>>>> +{
>>>>>> + struct clk_bit_info *bit_info = get_clk_bit_info(peripheral);
>>>>>> + unsigned long sclk, sub_clk = 0;
>>>>>> + unsigned int src, div, sub_div = 0;
>>>>>> + struct exynos5420_clock *clk =
>>>>>> + (struct exynos5420_clock *)samsung_get_base_clock();
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + switch (peripheral) {
>>>>>> + case PERIPH_ID_UART0:
>>>>>> + case PERIPH_ID_UART1:
>>>>>> + case PERIPH_ID_UART2:
>>>>>> + case PERIPH_ID_UART3:
>>>>>> + case PERIPH_ID_PWM0:
>>>>>> + case PERIPH_ID_PWM1:
>>>>>> + case PERIPH_ID_PWM2:
>>>>>> + case PERIPH_ID_PWM3:
>>>>>> + case PERIPH_ID_PWM4:
>>>>>> + src = readl(&clk->src_peric0);
>>>>>> + div = readl(&clk->div_peric0);
>>>>>> + break;
>>>>>> + case PERIPH_ID_SPI0:
>>>>>> + case PERIPH_ID_SPI1:
>>>>>> + case PERIPH_ID_SPI2:
>>>>>> + src = readl(&clk->src_peric1);
>>>>>> + div = readl(&clk->div_peric1);
>>>>>> + sub_div = readl(&clk->div_peric4);
>>>>>> + break;
>>>>>> + case PERIPH_ID_SPI3:
>>>>>> + case PERIPH_ID_SPI4:
>>>>>> + src = readl(&clk->src_isp);
>>>>>> + div = readl(&clk->div_isp1);
>>>>>> + sub_div = readl(&clk->div_isp1);
>>>>>> + break;
>>>>>> + case PERIPH_ID_SDMMC0:
>>>>>> + case PERIPH_ID_SDMMC1:
>>>>>> + case PERIPH_ID_SDMMC2:
>>>>>> + case PERIPH_ID_SDMMC3:
>>>>>> + src = readl(&clk->src_fsys);
>>>>>> + div = readl(&clk->div_fsys1);
>>>>>> + break;
>>>>>> + case PERIPH_ID_I2C0:
>>>>>> + case PERIPH_ID_I2C1:
>>>>>> + case PERIPH_ID_I2C2:
>>>>>> + case PERIPH_ID_I2C3:
>>>>>> + case PERIPH_ID_I2C4:
>>>>>> + case PERIPH_ID_I2C5:
>>>>>> + case PERIPH_ID_I2C6:
>>>>>> + case PERIPH_ID_I2C7:
>>>>>> + case PERIPH_ID_I2C8:
>>>>>> + case PERIPH_ID_I2C9:
>>>>>> + case PERIPH_ID_I2C10:
>>>>>> + sclk = exynos542x_get_pll_clk(MPLL);
>>>>>> + sub_div = ((readl(&clk->div_top1) >> bit_info->div_bit)
>>>>>> + & 0x7) + 1;
>>>>>> + return sclk / sub_div;
>>>>>> + default:
>>>>>> + debug("%s: invalid peripheral %d", __func__, peripheral);
>>>>>> + return -1;
>>>>>> + };
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + if (bit_info->src_bit >= 0)
>>>>>> + src = (src >> bit_info->src_bit) & 0xf;
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> + switch (src) {
>>>>>> + case EXYNOS542x_SRC_MPLL:
>>>>>> + sclk = exynos542x_get_pll_clk(MPLL);
>>>>>> + break;
>>>>>> + case EXYNOS542x_SRC_EPLL:
>>>>>> + sclk = exynos542x_get_pll_clk(EPLL);
>>>>>> + break;
>>>>>> + case EXYNOS542x_SRC_RPLL:
>>>>>> + sclk = exynos542x_get_pll_clk(RPLL);
>>>>>> + break;
>>>>>> + default:
>>>>>> + return 0;
>>>>>> + }
>>>>>> +
>>>>>
>>>>> Odroid xu3 board uses SPLL as source clock for SDMMCx, please SPLL case.
>>>>
>>>> Perhaps this can be sorted out by the maintainer of that board? I'm
>>>> not sure how we can deal with this other than a special case.
>>>> Certainly Akshay is not going to know what to do here.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I don't think this is special case, SPLL also can be used as source
>>> clock like MPLL, EPLL and RPLL.
>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> + /* Ratio clock division for this peripheral */
>>>>>> + if (bit_info->div_bit >= 0) {
>>>>>> + div = (div >> bit_info->div_bit) & 0xf;
>>>>>
>>>>> Hmm, mask bits are different each peripheral, e.g. SDMMCx needs 0x3ff
>>>>> mask bits.
>>>>>
>>>
>>> Akshay, could you follow up this?
>>
>> Can you please issue a Reviewed-by/Tested-by for those patches you are
>> happy with?
>>
>
> Sure, i will reply Reviewed-by or Tested-by if he solves issues.
OK, so are any of the patches OK now? Basically I'm not sure if you
have more comments. It looks like 3-4 of them are OK, but I'm not
sure.
Regards,
Simon
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 3/6] Exynos542x: Add and enable get_periph_rate support
2015-01-28 5:15 ` Simon Glass
@ 2015-01-28 5:55 ` Joonyoung Shim
2015-01-30 2:22 ` Jaehoon Chung
0 siblings, 1 reply; 20+ messages in thread
From: Joonyoung Shim @ 2015-01-28 5:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Hi Simon,
On 01/28/2015 02:15 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Joonyoung,
>
> On 27 January 2015 at 22:12, Joonyoung Shim <jy0922.shim@samsung.com> wrote:
>> Hi Simon,
>>
>> On 01/28/2015 02:01 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
>>> Hi Joonyoung,
>>>
>>> On 27 January 2015 at 21:46, Joonyoung Shim <jy0922.shim@samsung.com> wrote:
>>>> Hi Simon,
>>>>
>>>> On 01/28/2015 01:09 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> On 15 January 2015 at 23:09, Joonyoung Shim <jy0922.shim@samsung.com> wrote:
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 01/16/2015 02:48 PM, Akshay Saraswat wrote:
>>>>>>> We planned to fetch peripheral rate through one generic API per
>>>>>>> peripheral. These generic peripheral functions are in turn
>>>>>>> expected to fetch apt values from a function refactored as
>>>>>>> per SoC versions. This patch adds support for fetching peripheral
>>>>>>> rates for Exynos5420 and Exynos5800.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Akshay Saraswat <akshay.s@samsung.com>
>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>> Changes since v2:
>>>>>>> - Fixed enum and exynos542x_get_periph_rate switch.
>>>>>>> - Added checks for negative values in exynos542x_get_periph_rate.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Changes since v1:
>>>>>>> - Changes suuport -> support in commit message.
>>>>>>> - Removed position change of exynos5420_get_pll_clk.
>>>>>>> - Removed #ifdef.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> arch/arm/cpu/armv7/exynos/clock.c | 151 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>>>>>>> arch/arm/include/asm/arch-exynos/clk.h | 3 +
>>>>>>> 2 files changed, 147 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> What else needs to be done to get this applied, please?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> As i said, current this patch has some problem like mask bits, so eMMC
>>>> doesn't work normally.
>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/exynos/clock.c b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/exynos/clock.c
>>>>>>> index 5dc9ed2..ee6c13b 100644
>>>>>>> --- a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/exynos/clock.c
>>>>>>> +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/exynos/clock.c
>>>>>>> @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ struct clk_bit_info {
>>>>>>> };
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> /* periph_id src_bit div_bit prediv_bit */
>>>>>>> -static struct clk_bit_info clk_bit_info[] = {
>>>>>>> +static struct clk_bit_info exynos5_bit_info[] = {
>>>>>>> {PERIPH_ID_UART0, 0, 0, -1},
>>>>>>> {PERIPH_ID_UART1, 4, 4, -1},
>>>>>>> {PERIPH_ID_UART2, 8, 8, -1},
>>>>>>> @@ -61,6 +61,42 @@ static struct clk_bit_info clk_bit_info[] = {
>>>>>>> {PERIPH_ID_NONE, -1, -1, -1},
>>>>>>> };
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> +static struct clk_bit_info exynos542x_bit_info[] = {
>>>>>>> + {PERIPH_ID_UART0, 4, 8, -1},
>>>>>>> + {PERIPH_ID_UART1, 8, 12, -1},
>>>>>>> + {PERIPH_ID_UART2, 12, 16, -1},
>>>>>>> + {PERIPH_ID_UART3, 16, 20, -1},
>>>>>>> + {PERIPH_ID_I2C0, -1, 8, -1},
>>>>>>> + {PERIPH_ID_I2C1, -1, 8, -1},
>>>>>>> + {PERIPH_ID_I2C2, -1, 8, -1},
>>>>>>> + {PERIPH_ID_I2C3, -1, 8, -1},
>>>>>>> + {PERIPH_ID_I2C4, -1, 8, -1},
>>>>>>> + {PERIPH_ID_I2C5, -1, 8, -1},
>>>>>>> + {PERIPH_ID_I2C6, -1, 8, -1},
>>>>>>> + {PERIPH_ID_I2C7, -1, 8, -1},
>>>>>>> + {PERIPH_ID_SPI0, 20, 20, 8},
>>>>>>> + {PERIPH_ID_SPI1, 24, 24, 16},
>>>>>>> + {PERIPH_ID_SPI2, 28, 28, 24},
>>>>>>> + {PERIPH_ID_SDMMC0, 0, 0, -1},
>>>>>>> + {PERIPH_ID_SDMMC1, 4, 10, -1},
>>>>>>> + {PERIPH_ID_SDMMC2, 8, 20, -1},
>>>>>>> + {PERIPH_ID_I2C8, -1, 8, -1},
>>>>>>> + {PERIPH_ID_I2C9, -1, 8, -1},
>>>>>>> + {PERIPH_ID_I2S0, 0, 0, 4},
>>>>>>> + {PERIPH_ID_I2S1, 4, 12, 16},
>>>>>>> + {PERIPH_ID_SPI3, 12, 16, 0},
>>>>>>> + {PERIPH_ID_SPI4, 16, 20, 8},
>>>>>>> + {PERIPH_ID_SDMMC4, 16, 0, 8},
>>>>>>> + {PERIPH_ID_PWM0, 24, 28, -1},
>>>>>>> + {PERIPH_ID_PWM1, 24, 28, -1},
>>>>>>> + {PERIPH_ID_PWM2, 24, 28, -1},
>>>>>>> + {PERIPH_ID_PWM3, 24, 28, -1},
>>>>>>> + {PERIPH_ID_PWM4, 24, 28, -1},
>>>>>>> + {PERIPH_ID_I2C10, -1, 8, -1},
>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>> + {PERIPH_ID_NONE, -1, -1, -1},
>>>>>>> +};
>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>> /* Epll Clock division values to achive different frequency output */
>>>>>>> static struct set_epll_con_val exynos5_epll_div[] = {
>>>>>>> { 192000000, 0, 48, 3, 1, 0 },
>>>>>>> @@ -306,16 +342,22 @@ static unsigned long exynos542x_get_pll_clk(int pllreg)
>>>>>>> static struct clk_bit_info *get_clk_bit_info(int peripheral)
>>>>>>> {
>>>>>>> int i;
>>>>>>> + struct clk_bit_info *info;
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> - for (i = 0; clk_bit_info[i].id != PERIPH_ID_NONE; i++) {
>>>>>>> - if (clk_bit_info[i].id == peripheral)
>>>>>>> + if (proid_is_exynos5420() || proid_is_exynos5800())
>>>>>>> + info = exynos542x_bit_info;
>>>>>>> + else
>>>>>>> + info = exynos5_bit_info;
>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>> + for (i = 0; info[i].id != PERIPH_ID_NONE; i++) {
>>>>>>> + if (info[i].id == peripheral)
>>>>>>> break;
>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> - if (clk_bit_info[i].id == PERIPH_ID_NONE)
>>>>>>> + if (info[i].id == PERIPH_ID_NONE)
>>>>>>> debug("ERROR: Peripheral ID %d not found\n", peripheral);
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> - return &clk_bit_info[i];
>>>>>>> + return &info[i];
>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> static unsigned long exynos5_get_periph_rate(int peripheral)
>>>>>>> @@ -414,12 +456,107 @@ static unsigned long exynos5_get_periph_rate(int peripheral)
>>>>>>> return sub_clk;
>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> +static unsigned long exynos542x_get_periph_rate(int peripheral)
>>>>>>> +{
>>>>>>> + struct clk_bit_info *bit_info = get_clk_bit_info(peripheral);
>>>>>>> + unsigned long sclk, sub_clk = 0;
>>>>>>> + unsigned int src, div, sub_div = 0;
>>>>>>> + struct exynos5420_clock *clk =
>>>>>>> + (struct exynos5420_clock *)samsung_get_base_clock();
>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>> + switch (peripheral) {
>>>>>>> + case PERIPH_ID_UART0:
>>>>>>> + case PERIPH_ID_UART1:
>>>>>>> + case PERIPH_ID_UART2:
>>>>>>> + case PERIPH_ID_UART3:
>>>>>>> + case PERIPH_ID_PWM0:
>>>>>>> + case PERIPH_ID_PWM1:
>>>>>>> + case PERIPH_ID_PWM2:
>>>>>>> + case PERIPH_ID_PWM3:
>>>>>>> + case PERIPH_ID_PWM4:
>>>>>>> + src = readl(&clk->src_peric0);
>>>>>>> + div = readl(&clk->div_peric0);
>>>>>>> + break;
>>>>>>> + case PERIPH_ID_SPI0:
>>>>>>> + case PERIPH_ID_SPI1:
>>>>>>> + case PERIPH_ID_SPI2:
>>>>>>> + src = readl(&clk->src_peric1);
>>>>>>> + div = readl(&clk->div_peric1);
>>>>>>> + sub_div = readl(&clk->div_peric4);
>>>>>>> + break;
>>>>>>> + case PERIPH_ID_SPI3:
>>>>>>> + case PERIPH_ID_SPI4:
>>>>>>> + src = readl(&clk->src_isp);
>>>>>>> + div = readl(&clk->div_isp1);
>>>>>>> + sub_div = readl(&clk->div_isp1);
>>>>>>> + break;
>>>>>>> + case PERIPH_ID_SDMMC0:
>>>>>>> + case PERIPH_ID_SDMMC1:
>>>>>>> + case PERIPH_ID_SDMMC2:
>>>>>>> + case PERIPH_ID_SDMMC3:
>>>>>>> + src = readl(&clk->src_fsys);
>>>>>>> + div = readl(&clk->div_fsys1);
>>>>>>> + break;
>>>>>>> + case PERIPH_ID_I2C0:
>>>>>>> + case PERIPH_ID_I2C1:
>>>>>>> + case PERIPH_ID_I2C2:
>>>>>>> + case PERIPH_ID_I2C3:
>>>>>>> + case PERIPH_ID_I2C4:
>>>>>>> + case PERIPH_ID_I2C5:
>>>>>>> + case PERIPH_ID_I2C6:
>>>>>>> + case PERIPH_ID_I2C7:
>>>>>>> + case PERIPH_ID_I2C8:
>>>>>>> + case PERIPH_ID_I2C9:
>>>>>>> + case PERIPH_ID_I2C10:
>>>>>>> + sclk = exynos542x_get_pll_clk(MPLL);
>>>>>>> + sub_div = ((readl(&clk->div_top1) >> bit_info->div_bit)
>>>>>>> + & 0x7) + 1;
>>>>>>> + return sclk / sub_div;
>>>>>>> + default:
>>>>>>> + debug("%s: invalid peripheral %d", __func__, peripheral);
>>>>>>> + return -1;
>>>>>>> + };
>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>> + if (bit_info->src_bit >= 0)
>>>>>>> + src = (src >> bit_info->src_bit) & 0xf;
>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>> + switch (src) {
>>>>>>> + case EXYNOS542x_SRC_MPLL:
>>>>>>> + sclk = exynos542x_get_pll_clk(MPLL);
>>>>>>> + break;
>>>>>>> + case EXYNOS542x_SRC_EPLL:
>>>>>>> + sclk = exynos542x_get_pll_clk(EPLL);
>>>>>>> + break;
>>>>>>> + case EXYNOS542x_SRC_RPLL:
>>>>>>> + sclk = exynos542x_get_pll_clk(RPLL);
>>>>>>> + break;
>>>>>>> + default:
>>>>>>> + return 0;
>>>>>>> + }
>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Odroid xu3 board uses SPLL as source clock for SDMMCx, please SPLL case.
>>>>>
>>>>> Perhaps this can be sorted out by the maintainer of that board? I'm
>>>>> not sure how we can deal with this other than a special case.
>>>>> Certainly Akshay is not going to know what to do here.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I don't think this is special case, SPLL also can be used as source
>>>> clock like MPLL, EPLL and RPLL.
>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> + /* Ratio clock division for this peripheral */
>>>>>>> + if (bit_info->div_bit >= 0) {
>>>>>>> + div = (div >> bit_info->div_bit) & 0xf;
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hmm, mask bits are different each peripheral, e.g. SDMMCx needs 0x3ff
>>>>>> mask bits.
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Akshay, could you follow up this?
>>>
>>> Can you please issue a Reviewed-by/Tested-by for those patches you are
>>> happy with?
>>>
>>
>> Sure, i will reply Reviewed-by or Tested-by if he solves issues.
>
> OK, so are any of the patches OK now? Basically I'm not sure if you
> have more comments. It looks like 3-4 of them are OK, but I'm not
> sure.
>
They are ok to me except 3, 5, 6 patches because if 3 patch isn't fixed
5,6 patches are meaningless.
Thanks.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 3/6] Exynos542x: Add and enable get_periph_rate support
2015-01-28 5:55 ` Joonyoung Shim
@ 2015-01-30 2:22 ` Jaehoon Chung
0 siblings, 0 replies; 20+ messages in thread
From: Jaehoon Chung @ 2015-01-30 2:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
Hi, All.
On 01/28/2015 02:55 PM, Joonyoung Shim wrote:
> Hi Simon,
>
> On 01/28/2015 02:15 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
>> Hi Joonyoung,
>>
>> On 27 January 2015 at 22:12, Joonyoung Shim <jy0922.shim@samsung.com> wrote:
>>> Hi Simon,
>>>
>>> On 01/28/2015 02:01 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
>>>> Hi Joonyoung,
>>>>
>>>> On 27 January 2015 at 21:46, Joonyoung Shim <jy0922.shim@samsung.com> wrote:
>>>>> Hi Simon,
>>>>>
>>>>> On 01/28/2015 01:09 PM, Simon Glass wrote:
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 15 January 2015 at 23:09, Joonyoung Shim <jy0922.shim@samsung.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 01/16/2015 02:48 PM, Akshay Saraswat wrote:
>>>>>>>> We planned to fetch peripheral rate through one generic API per
>>>>>>>> peripheral. These generic peripheral functions are in turn
>>>>>>>> expected to fetch apt values from a function refactored as
>>>>>>>> per SoC versions. This patch adds support for fetching peripheral
>>>>>>>> rates for Exynos5420 and Exynos5800.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Akshay Saraswat <akshay.s@samsung.com>
>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>> Changes since v2:
>>>>>>>> - Fixed enum and exynos542x_get_periph_rate switch.
>>>>>>>> - Added checks for negative values in exynos542x_get_periph_rate.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Changes since v1:
>>>>>>>> - Changes suuport -> support in commit message.
>>>>>>>> - Removed position change of exynos5420_get_pll_clk.
>>>>>>>> - Removed #ifdef.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> arch/arm/cpu/armv7/exynos/clock.c | 151 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>>>>>>>> arch/arm/include/asm/arch-exynos/clk.h | 3 +
>>>>>>>> 2 files changed, 147 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What else needs to be done to get this applied, please?
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> As i said, current this patch has some problem like mask bits, so eMMC
>>>>> doesn't work normally.
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/exynos/clock.c b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/exynos/clock.c
>>>>>>>> index 5dc9ed2..ee6c13b 100644
>>>>>>>> --- a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/exynos/clock.c
>>>>>>>> +++ b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/exynos/clock.c
>>>>>>>> @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ struct clk_bit_info {
>>>>>>>> };
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> /* periph_id src_bit div_bit prediv_bit */
>>>>>>>> -static struct clk_bit_info clk_bit_info[] = {
>>>>>>>> +static struct clk_bit_info exynos5_bit_info[] = {
>>>>>>>> {PERIPH_ID_UART0, 0, 0, -1},
>>>>>>>> {PERIPH_ID_UART1, 4, 4, -1},
>>>>>>>> {PERIPH_ID_UART2, 8, 8, -1},
>>>>>>>> @@ -61,6 +61,42 @@ static struct clk_bit_info clk_bit_info[] = {
>>>>>>>> {PERIPH_ID_NONE, -1, -1, -1},
>>>>>>>> };
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> +static struct clk_bit_info exynos542x_bit_info[] = {
>>>>>>>> + {PERIPH_ID_UART0, 4, 8, -1},
>>>>>>>> + {PERIPH_ID_UART1, 8, 12, -1},
>>>>>>>> + {PERIPH_ID_UART2, 12, 16, -1},
>>>>>>>> + {PERIPH_ID_UART3, 16, 20, -1},
>>>>>>>> + {PERIPH_ID_I2C0, -1, 8, -1},
>>>>>>>> + {PERIPH_ID_I2C1, -1, 8, -1},
>>>>>>>> + {PERIPH_ID_I2C2, -1, 8, -1},
>>>>>>>> + {PERIPH_ID_I2C3, -1, 8, -1},
>>>>>>>> + {PERIPH_ID_I2C4, -1, 8, -1},
>>>>>>>> + {PERIPH_ID_I2C5, -1, 8, -1},
>>>>>>>> + {PERIPH_ID_I2C6, -1, 8, -1},
>>>>>>>> + {PERIPH_ID_I2C7, -1, 8, -1},
>>>>>>>> + {PERIPH_ID_SPI0, 20, 20, 8},
>>>>>>>> + {PERIPH_ID_SPI1, 24, 24, 16},
>>>>>>>> + {PERIPH_ID_SPI2, 28, 28, 24},
>>>>>>>> + {PERIPH_ID_SDMMC0, 0, 0, -1},
>>>>>>>> + {PERIPH_ID_SDMMC1, 4, 10, -1},
>>>>>>>> + {PERIPH_ID_SDMMC2, 8, 20, -1},
>>>>>>>> + {PERIPH_ID_I2C8, -1, 8, -1},
>>>>>>>> + {PERIPH_ID_I2C9, -1, 8, -1},
>>>>>>>> + {PERIPH_ID_I2S0, 0, 0, 4},
>>>>>>>> + {PERIPH_ID_I2S1, 4, 12, 16},
>>>>>>>> + {PERIPH_ID_SPI3, 12, 16, 0},
>>>>>>>> + {PERIPH_ID_SPI4, 16, 20, 8},
>>>>>>>> + {PERIPH_ID_SDMMC4, 16, 0, 8},
>>>>>>>> + {PERIPH_ID_PWM0, 24, 28, -1},
>>>>>>>> + {PERIPH_ID_PWM1, 24, 28, -1},
>>>>>>>> + {PERIPH_ID_PWM2, 24, 28, -1},
>>>>>>>> + {PERIPH_ID_PWM3, 24, 28, -1},
>>>>>>>> + {PERIPH_ID_PWM4, 24, 28, -1},
>>>>>>>> + {PERIPH_ID_I2C10, -1, 8, -1},
>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>> + {PERIPH_ID_NONE, -1, -1, -1},
>>>>>>>> +};
>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>> /* Epll Clock division values to achive different frequency output */
>>>>>>>> static struct set_epll_con_val exynos5_epll_div[] = {
>>>>>>>> { 192000000, 0, 48, 3, 1, 0 },
>>>>>>>> @@ -306,16 +342,22 @@ static unsigned long exynos542x_get_pll_clk(int pllreg)
>>>>>>>> static struct clk_bit_info *get_clk_bit_info(int peripheral)
>>>>>>>> {
>>>>>>>> int i;
>>>>>>>> + struct clk_bit_info *info;
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> - for (i = 0; clk_bit_info[i].id != PERIPH_ID_NONE; i++) {
>>>>>>>> - if (clk_bit_info[i].id == peripheral)
>>>>>>>> + if (proid_is_exynos5420() || proid_is_exynos5800())
>>>>>>>> + info = exynos542x_bit_info;
>>>>>>>> + else
>>>>>>>> + info = exynos5_bit_info;
>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>> + for (i = 0; info[i].id != PERIPH_ID_NONE; i++) {
>>>>>>>> + if (info[i].id == peripheral)
>>>>>>>> break;
>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> - if (clk_bit_info[i].id == PERIPH_ID_NONE)
>>>>>>>> + if (info[i].id == PERIPH_ID_NONE)
>>>>>>>> debug("ERROR: Peripheral ID %d not found\n", peripheral);
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> - return &clk_bit_info[i];
>>>>>>>> + return &info[i];
>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> static unsigned long exynos5_get_periph_rate(int peripheral)
>>>>>>>> @@ -414,12 +456,107 @@ static unsigned long exynos5_get_periph_rate(int peripheral)
>>>>>>>> return sub_clk;
>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> +static unsigned long exynos542x_get_periph_rate(int peripheral)
>>>>>>>> +{
>>>>>>>> + struct clk_bit_info *bit_info = get_clk_bit_info(peripheral);
>>>>>>>> + unsigned long sclk, sub_clk = 0;
>>>>>>>> + unsigned int src, div, sub_div = 0;
>>>>>>>> + struct exynos5420_clock *clk =
>>>>>>>> + (struct exynos5420_clock *)samsung_get_base_clock();
>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>> + switch (peripheral) {
>>>>>>>> + case PERIPH_ID_UART0:
>>>>>>>> + case PERIPH_ID_UART1:
>>>>>>>> + case PERIPH_ID_UART2:
>>>>>>>> + case PERIPH_ID_UART3:
>>>>>>>> + case PERIPH_ID_PWM0:
>>>>>>>> + case PERIPH_ID_PWM1:
>>>>>>>> + case PERIPH_ID_PWM2:
>>>>>>>> + case PERIPH_ID_PWM3:
>>>>>>>> + case PERIPH_ID_PWM4:
>>>>>>>> + src = readl(&clk->src_peric0);
>>>>>>>> + div = readl(&clk->div_peric0);
>>>>>>>> + break;
>>>>>>>> + case PERIPH_ID_SPI0:
>>>>>>>> + case PERIPH_ID_SPI1:
>>>>>>>> + case PERIPH_ID_SPI2:
>>>>>>>> + src = readl(&clk->src_peric1);
>>>>>>>> + div = readl(&clk->div_peric1);
>>>>>>>> + sub_div = readl(&clk->div_peric4);
>>>>>>>> + break;
>>>>>>>> + case PERIPH_ID_SPI3:
>>>>>>>> + case PERIPH_ID_SPI4:
>>>>>>>> + src = readl(&clk->src_isp);
>>>>>>>> + div = readl(&clk->div_isp1);
>>>>>>>> + sub_div = readl(&clk->div_isp1);
>>>>>>>> + break;
>>>>>>>> + case PERIPH_ID_SDMMC0:
>>>>>>>> + case PERIPH_ID_SDMMC1:
>>>>>>>> + case PERIPH_ID_SDMMC2:
>>>>>>>> + case PERIPH_ID_SDMMC3:
>>>>>>>> + src = readl(&clk->src_fsys);
>>>>>>>> + div = readl(&clk->div_fsys1);
>>>>>>>> + break;
>>>>>>>> + case PERIPH_ID_I2C0:
>>>>>>>> + case PERIPH_ID_I2C1:
>>>>>>>> + case PERIPH_ID_I2C2:
>>>>>>>> + case PERIPH_ID_I2C3:
>>>>>>>> + case PERIPH_ID_I2C4:
>>>>>>>> + case PERIPH_ID_I2C5:
>>>>>>>> + case PERIPH_ID_I2C6:
>>>>>>>> + case PERIPH_ID_I2C7:
>>>>>>>> + case PERIPH_ID_I2C8:
>>>>>>>> + case PERIPH_ID_I2C9:
>>>>>>>> + case PERIPH_ID_I2C10:
>>>>>>>> + sclk = exynos542x_get_pll_clk(MPLL);
>>>>>>>> + sub_div = ((readl(&clk->div_top1) >> bit_info->div_bit)
>>>>>>>> + & 0x7) + 1;
>>>>>>>> + return sclk / sub_div;
>>>>>>>> + default:
>>>>>>>> + debug("%s: invalid peripheral %d", __func__, peripheral);
>>>>>>>> + return -1;
>>>>>>>> + };
>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>> + if (bit_info->src_bit >= 0)
>>>>>>>> + src = (src >> bit_info->src_bit) & 0xf;
>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>> + switch (src) {
>>>>>>>> + case EXYNOS542x_SRC_MPLL:
>>>>>>>> + sclk = exynos542x_get_pll_clk(MPLL);
>>>>>>>> + break;
>>>>>>>> + case EXYNOS542x_SRC_EPLL:
>>>>>>>> + sclk = exynos542x_get_pll_clk(EPLL);
>>>>>>>> + break;
>>>>>>>> + case EXYNOS542x_SRC_RPLL:
>>>>>>>> + sclk = exynos542x_get_pll_clk(RPLL);
>>>>>>>> + break;
>>>>>>>> + default:
>>>>>>>> + return 0;
>>>>>>>> + }
>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Odroid xu3 board uses SPLL as source clock for SDMMCx, please SPLL case.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Perhaps this can be sorted out by the maintainer of that board? I'm
>>>>>> not sure how we can deal with this other than a special case.
>>>>>> Certainly Akshay is not going to know what to do here.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't think this is special case, SPLL also can be used as source
>>>>> clock like MPLL, EPLL and RPLL.
>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> + /* Ratio clock division for this peripheral */
>>>>>>>> + if (bit_info->div_bit >= 0) {
>>>>>>>> + div = (div >> bit_info->div_bit) & 0xf;
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hmm, mask bits are different each peripheral, e.g. SDMMCx needs 0x3ff
>>>>>>> mask bits.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Akshay, could you follow up this?
>>>>
>>>> Can you please issue a Reviewed-by/Tested-by for those patches you are
>>>> happy with?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Sure, i will reply Reviewed-by or Tested-by if he solves issues.
>>
>> OK, so are any of the patches OK now? Basically I'm not sure if you
>> have more comments. It looks like 3-4 of them are OK, but I'm not
>> sure.
>>
>
> They are ok to me except 3, 5, 6 patches because if 3 patch isn't fixed
> 5,6 patches are meaningless.
Is Akshay working these? As Simon is mentioned, i want to know the plan..
If Akshay is busy, i will rework these with patches based on Akshay.
Best Regards,
Jaehoon Chung
>
> Thanks.
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 20+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-01-30 2:22 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-01-16 5:48 [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 0/6] Exynos5: Fix warnings and enrich clock_get_periph_rate Akshay Saraswat
2015-01-16 5:48 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 1/6] Exynos5: Fix compiler warnings due to clock_get_periph_rate Akshay Saraswat
2015-01-28 4:06 ` Simon Glass
2015-01-16 5:48 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 2/6] Exynos542x: Move exynos5420_get_pll_clk up and rename Akshay Saraswat
2015-01-28 4:06 ` Simon Glass
2015-01-16 5:48 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 3/6] Exynos542x: Add and enable get_periph_rate support Akshay Saraswat
2015-01-16 6:09 ` Joonyoung Shim
2015-01-28 4:09 ` Simon Glass
2015-01-28 4:46 ` Joonyoung Shim
2015-01-28 5:01 ` Simon Glass
2015-01-28 5:12 ` Joonyoung Shim
2015-01-28 5:15 ` Simon Glass
2015-01-28 5:55 ` Joonyoung Shim
2015-01-30 2:22 ` Jaehoon Chung
2015-01-16 5:48 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 4/6] Exynos5: Fix exynos5_get_periph_rate calculations Akshay Saraswat
2015-01-28 4:09 ` Simon Glass
2015-01-16 5:48 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 5/6] Exynos5: Use clock_get_periph_rate generic API Akshay Saraswat
2015-01-28 4:09 ` Simon Glass
2015-01-16 5:48 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 6/6] Exynos5: Remove dead code for fetching clocks Akshay Saraswat
2015-01-28 4:09 ` Simon Glass
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.