* [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 0/4] dm:gpio:mxc add DT support
@ 2015-01-21 11:09 Peng Fan
2015-01-21 11:09 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 1/4] dm: introduce dev_get_addr interface Peng Fan
` (3 more replies)
0 siblings, 4 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Peng Fan @ 2015-01-21 11:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
This patch set is to add DT support for mxc_gpio driver.
patch 1/4 and 2/4, a new dev_get_addr interface is abstracted to
improve driver who want to get device address.
patch 3/4, add a new bank_index entry in platdata to avoid `plat - mxc_plat`
pointer subtract usage.
patch 4/4, add compatible ids and implement bind function. Also commented
out U_BOOT_DEVICES and mxc_plat, since they are not needed
if using DT.
Changes v3:
1. split bank_index patch
2. abstract dev_get_addr for driver
Changes v2:
1. remove uneccessary #ifdef
2. add more stuff in commit log
3. include a new function mxc_get_gpio_addr to get register base.
This function is different for DT and not DT, by `#ifdef`.
If using one implementation for DT and not DT, final image will be big.
4. include a new entry in platdata, named bank_index. it can simplify DT
support. To no DT, bank_index is static initilized; to DT, bank_index
is get from device's req_seq.
Peng Fan (4):
dm: introduce dev_get_addr interface
dm: add dev_get_addr prototype
dm:gpio:mxc add a bank_index entry in platdata
dm:gpio:mxc add DT support
drivers/core/device.c | 19 +++++++++++++
drivers/gpio/mxc_gpio.c | 72 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
include/dm/device.h | 9 +++++++
3 files changed, 82 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
--
1.8.4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread* [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 1/4] dm: introduce dev_get_addr interface 2015-01-21 11:09 [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 0/4] dm:gpio:mxc add DT support Peng Fan @ 2015-01-21 11:09 ` Peng Fan 2015-01-21 11:58 ` Igor Grinberg 2015-01-22 21:25 ` Simon Glass 2015-01-21 11:09 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 2/4] dm: add dev_get_addr prototype Peng Fan ` (2 subsequent siblings) 3 siblings, 2 replies; 18+ messages in thread From: Peng Fan @ 2015-01-21 11:09 UTC (permalink / raw) To: u-boot Abstracting dev_get_addr can improve drivers that want to get device's address. Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <Peng.Fan@freescale.com> --- drivers/core/device.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/core/device.c b/drivers/core/device.c index 963b16f..0ba5c76 100644 --- a/drivers/core/device.c +++ b/drivers/core/device.c @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ #include <common.h> #include <fdtdec.h> #include <malloc.h> +#include <libfdt.h> #include <dm/device.h> #include <dm/device-internal.h> #include <dm/lists.h> @@ -390,3 +391,21 @@ ulong dev_get_of_data(struct udevice *dev) { return dev->of_id->data; } + +#ifdef CONFIG_OF_CONTROL +void *dev_get_addr(struct udevice *dev) +{ + fdt_addr_t addr; + + addr = fdtdec_get_addr(gd->fdt_blob, dev->of_offset, "reg"); + if (addr == FDT_ADDR_T_NONE) + return NULL; + else + return (void *)addr; +} +#else +void *dev_get_addr(struct udevice *dev) +{ + return NULL; +} +#endif -- 1.8.4 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 1/4] dm: introduce dev_get_addr interface 2015-01-21 11:09 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 1/4] dm: introduce dev_get_addr interface Peng Fan @ 2015-01-21 11:58 ` Igor Grinberg 2015-01-22 21:25 ` Simon Glass 1 sibling, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread From: Igor Grinberg @ 2015-01-21 11:58 UTC (permalink / raw) To: u-boot On 01/21/15 13:09, Peng Fan wrote: > Abstracting dev_get_addr can improve drivers that want to > get device's address. > > Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <Peng.Fan@freescale.com> Acked-by: Igor Grinberg <grinberg@compulab.co.il> -- Regards, Igor. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 1/4] dm: introduce dev_get_addr interface 2015-01-21 11:09 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 1/4] dm: introduce dev_get_addr interface Peng Fan 2015-01-21 11:58 ` Igor Grinberg @ 2015-01-22 21:25 ` Simon Glass 2015-02-06 6:44 ` Peng Fan 1 sibling, 1 reply; 18+ messages in thread From: Simon Glass @ 2015-01-22 21:25 UTC (permalink / raw) To: u-boot Hi, On 21 January 2015 at 04:09, Peng Fan <Peng.Fan@freescale.com> wrote: > Abstracting dev_get_addr can improve drivers that want to > get device's address. > > Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <Peng.Fan@freescale.com> > --- > drivers/core/device.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/core/device.c b/drivers/core/device.c > index 963b16f..0ba5c76 100644 > --- a/drivers/core/device.c > +++ b/drivers/core/device.c > @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ > #include <common.h> > #include <fdtdec.h> > #include <malloc.h> > +#include <libfdt.h> > #include <dm/device.h> > #include <dm/device-internal.h> > #include <dm/lists.h> > @@ -390,3 +391,21 @@ ulong dev_get_of_data(struct udevice *dev) > { > return dev->of_id->data; > } > + > +#ifdef CONFIG_OF_CONTROL > +void *dev_get_addr(struct udevice *dev) My approach so far has been to use a ulong for the device address (e.g. in platform data) and only use a pointer when we know the type (e.g. struct disp_ctlr *), typically in driver-private data. So do you think it would be better to return FDT_ADDR_T_NONE? > +{ > + fdt_addr_t addr; > + > + addr = fdtdec_get_addr(gd->fdt_blob, dev->of_offset, "reg"); > + if (addr == FDT_ADDR_T_NONE) > + return NULL; > + else > + return (void *)addr; > +} > +#else > +void *dev_get_addr(struct udevice *dev) > +{ > + return NULL; > +} > +#endif > -- > 1.8.4 > > Regards, Simon ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 1/4] dm: introduce dev_get_addr interface 2015-01-22 21:25 ` Simon Glass @ 2015-02-06 6:44 ` Peng Fan 2015-02-06 15:45 ` Simon Glass 0 siblings, 1 reply; 18+ messages in thread From: Peng Fan @ 2015-02-06 6:44 UTC (permalink / raw) To: u-boot Hi, Simon On 1/23/2015 5:25 AM, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi, > > On 21 January 2015 at 04:09, Peng Fan <Peng.Fan@freescale.com> wrote: >> Abstracting dev_get_addr can improve drivers that want to >> get device's address. >> >> Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <Peng.Fan@freescale.com> >> --- >> drivers/core/device.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/core/device.c b/drivers/core/device.c >> index 963b16f..0ba5c76 100644 >> --- a/drivers/core/device.c >> +++ b/drivers/core/device.c >> @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ >> #include <common.h> >> #include <fdtdec.h> >> #include <malloc.h> >> +#include <libfdt.h> >> #include <dm/device.h> >> #include <dm/device-internal.h> >> #include <dm/lists.h> >> @@ -390,3 +391,21 @@ ulong dev_get_of_data(struct udevice *dev) >> { >> return dev->of_id->data; >> } >> + >> +#ifdef CONFIG_OF_CONTROL >> +void *dev_get_addr(struct udevice *dev) > My approach so far has been to use a ulong for the device address > (e.g. in platform data) and only use a pointer when we know the type > (e.g. struct disp_ctlr *), typically in driver-private data. > > So do you think it would be better to return FDT_ADDR_T_NONE? Sorry for the long time delay to reply. Do you agree this way using ulong as the return type? " #ifdef CONFIG_OF_CONTROL unsigned long dev_get_addr(struct udevice *dev) { fdt_addr_t addr; addr = fdtdec_get_addr(gd->fdt_blob, dev->of_offset, "reg"); return addr; } #else unsigned long dev_get_addr(struct udevice *dev) { return FDT_ADDR_T_NONE; } #endif " Is it better to move this piece of code to include/dm/device.h and using static inline prototype? or put them still in driver/core/device.c? >> +{ >> + fdt_addr_t addr; >> + >> + addr = fdtdec_get_addr(gd->fdt_blob, dev->of_offset, "reg"); >> + if (addr == FDT_ADDR_T_NONE) >> + return NULL; >> + else >> + return (void *)addr; >> +} >> +#else >> +void *dev_get_addr(struct udevice *dev) >> +{ >> + return NULL; >> +} >> +#endif >> -- >> 1.8.4 >> >> > Regards, > Simon Thanks, Peng. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 1/4] dm: introduce dev_get_addr interface 2015-02-06 6:44 ` Peng Fan @ 2015-02-06 15:45 ` Simon Glass 0 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread From: Simon Glass @ 2015-02-06 15:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: u-boot Hi Peng, On 5 February 2015 at 23:44, Peng Fan <B51431@freescale.com> wrote: > Hi, Simon > > > On 1/23/2015 5:25 AM, Simon Glass wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> On 21 January 2015 at 04:09, Peng Fan <Peng.Fan@freescale.com> wrote: >>> >>> Abstracting dev_get_addr can improve drivers that want to >>> get device's address. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <Peng.Fan@freescale.com> >>> --- >>> drivers/core/device.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++ >>> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+) >>> >>> diff --git a/drivers/core/device.c b/drivers/core/device.c >>> index 963b16f..0ba5c76 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/core/device.c >>> +++ b/drivers/core/device.c >>> @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ >>> #include <common.h> >>> #include <fdtdec.h> >>> #include <malloc.h> >>> +#include <libfdt.h> >>> #include <dm/device.h> >>> #include <dm/device-internal.h> >>> #include <dm/lists.h> >>> @@ -390,3 +391,21 @@ ulong dev_get_of_data(struct udevice *dev) >>> { >>> return dev->of_id->data; >>> } >>> + >>> +#ifdef CONFIG_OF_CONTROL >>> +void *dev_get_addr(struct udevice *dev) >> >> My approach so far has been to use a ulong for the device address >> (e.g. in platform data) and only use a pointer when we know the type >> (e.g. struct disp_ctlr *), typically in driver-private data. >> >> So do you think it would be better to return FDT_ADDR_T_NONE? > > Sorry for the long time delay to reply. > Do you agree this way using ulong as the return type? > " > #ifdef CONFIG_OF_CONTROL > unsigned long dev_get_addr(struct udevice *dev) > { > fdt_addr_t addr; > addr = fdtdec_get_addr(gd->fdt_blob, dev->of_offset, "reg"); > return addr; > } > #else > unsigned long dev_get_addr(struct udevice *dev) > { > return FDT_ADDR_T_NONE; > } > #endif > " Sure, but can you return fdt_addr_t? > Is it better to move this piece of code to include/dm/device.h and using > static inline prototype? or put them still in driver/core/device.c? I'd suggest: - static inline in the header for the case where CONFIG_OF_CONTROL is not defined - full implementation in device.c when that is defined >>> >>> +{ >>> + fdt_addr_t addr; >>> + >>> + addr = fdtdec_get_addr(gd->fdt_blob, dev->of_offset, "reg"); >>> + if (addr == FDT_ADDR_T_NONE) >>> + return NULL; >>> + else >>> + return (void *)addr; >>> +} >>> +#else >>> +void *dev_get_addr(struct udevice *dev) >>> +{ >>> + return NULL; >>> +} >>> +#endif >>> -- >>> 1.8.4 Regards, Simon ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 2/4] dm: add dev_get_addr prototype 2015-01-21 11:09 [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 0/4] dm:gpio:mxc add DT support Peng Fan 2015-01-21 11:09 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 1/4] dm: introduce dev_get_addr interface Peng Fan @ 2015-01-21 11:09 ` Peng Fan 2015-01-21 11:59 ` Igor Grinberg 2015-01-21 11:09 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 3/4] dm:gpio:mxc add a bank_index entry in platdata Peng Fan 2015-01-21 11:09 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 4/4] dm:gpio:mxc add DT support Peng Fan 3 siblings, 1 reply; 18+ messages in thread From: Peng Fan @ 2015-01-21 11:09 UTC (permalink / raw) To: u-boot Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <Peng.Fan@freescale.com> --- include/dm/device.h | 9 +++++++++ 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+) diff --git a/include/dm/device.h b/include/dm/device.h index 13598a1..ee00c4d 100644 --- a/include/dm/device.h +++ b/include/dm/device.h @@ -322,4 +322,13 @@ int device_find_first_child(struct udevice *parent, struct udevice **devp); */ int device_find_next_child(struct udevice **devp); + +/** + * dev_get_addr() - Get the reg property of a device + * + * @dev: Pointer to a device. Returns reg address, or NULL if no DT + * + * @return addr, or NULL if NO DT + */ +void *dev_get_addr(struct udevice *dev); #endif -- 1.8.4 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 2/4] dm: add dev_get_addr prototype 2015-01-21 11:09 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 2/4] dm: add dev_get_addr prototype Peng Fan @ 2015-01-21 11:59 ` Igor Grinberg 0 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread From: Igor Grinberg @ 2015-01-21 11:59 UTC (permalink / raw) To: u-boot On 01/21/15 13:09, Peng Fan wrote: > Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <Peng.Fan@freescale.com> I think this should be a part of the first patch, anyway: Acked-by: Igor Grinberg <grinberg@compulab.co.il> > --- > include/dm/device.h | 9 +++++++++ > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/include/dm/device.h b/include/dm/device.h > index 13598a1..ee00c4d 100644 > --- a/include/dm/device.h > +++ b/include/dm/device.h > @@ -322,4 +322,13 @@ int device_find_first_child(struct udevice *parent, struct udevice **devp); > */ > int device_find_next_child(struct udevice **devp); > > + > +/** > + * dev_get_addr() - Get the reg property of a device > + * > + * @dev: Pointer to a device. Returns reg address, or NULL if no DT > + * > + * @return addr, or NULL if NO DT > + */ > +void *dev_get_addr(struct udevice *dev); > #endif > -- Regards, Igor. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 3/4] dm:gpio:mxc add a bank_index entry in platdata 2015-01-21 11:09 [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 0/4] dm:gpio:mxc add DT support Peng Fan 2015-01-21 11:09 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 1/4] dm: introduce dev_get_addr interface Peng Fan 2015-01-21 11:09 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 2/4] dm: add dev_get_addr prototype Peng Fan @ 2015-01-21 11:09 ` Peng Fan 2015-01-21 12:01 ` Igor Grinberg 2015-01-22 21:27 ` Simon Glass 2015-01-21 11:09 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 4/4] dm:gpio:mxc add DT support Peng Fan 3 siblings, 2 replies; 18+ messages in thread From: Peng Fan @ 2015-01-21 11:09 UTC (permalink / raw) To: u-boot Add a new entry in platdata structure and intialize bank_index in mxc_plat array. This new entry can avoid using `plat - mxc_plat` by using `plat->bank_index`. Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <Peng.Fan@freescale.com> --- drivers/gpio/mxc_gpio.c | 17 +++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpio/mxc_gpio.c b/drivers/gpio/mxc_gpio.c index 8bb9e39..c52dd19 100644 --- a/drivers/gpio/mxc_gpio.c +++ b/drivers/gpio/mxc_gpio.c @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ enum mxc_gpio_direction { #define GPIO_PER_BANK 32 struct mxc_gpio_plat { + int bank_index; struct gpio_regs *regs; }; @@ -259,19 +260,19 @@ static const struct dm_gpio_ops gpio_mxc_ops = { }; static const struct mxc_gpio_plat mxc_plat[] = { - { (struct gpio_regs *)GPIO1_BASE_ADDR }, - { (struct gpio_regs *)GPIO2_BASE_ADDR }, - { (struct gpio_regs *)GPIO3_BASE_ADDR }, + { 0, (struct gpio_regs *)GPIO1_BASE_ADDR }, + { 1, (struct gpio_regs *)GPIO2_BASE_ADDR }, + { 2, (struct gpio_regs *)GPIO3_BASE_ADDR }, #if defined(CONFIG_MX25) || defined(CONFIG_MX27) || defined(CONFIG_MX51) || \ defined(CONFIG_MX53) || defined(CONFIG_MX6) - { (struct gpio_regs *)GPIO4_BASE_ADDR }, + { 3, (struct gpio_regs *)GPIO4_BASE_ADDR }, #endif #if defined(CONFIG_MX27) || defined(CONFIG_MX53) || defined(CONFIG_MX6) - { (struct gpio_regs *)GPIO5_BASE_ADDR }, - { (struct gpio_regs *)GPIO6_BASE_ADDR }, + { 4, (struct gpio_regs *)GPIO5_BASE_ADDR }, + { 5, (struct gpio_regs *)GPIO6_BASE_ADDR }, #endif #if defined(CONFIG_MX53) || defined(CONFIG_MX6) - { (struct gpio_regs *)GPIO7_BASE_ADDR }, + { 6, (struct gpio_regs *)GPIO7_BASE_ADDR }, #endif }; @@ -283,7 +284,7 @@ static int mxc_gpio_probe(struct udevice *dev) int banknum; char name[18], *str; - banknum = plat - mxc_plat; + banknum = plat->bank_index; sprintf(name, "GPIO%d_", banknum + 1); str = strdup(name); if (!str) -- 1.8.4 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 3/4] dm:gpio:mxc add a bank_index entry in platdata 2015-01-21 11:09 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 3/4] dm:gpio:mxc add a bank_index entry in platdata Peng Fan @ 2015-01-21 12:01 ` Igor Grinberg 2015-01-22 21:27 ` Simon Glass 1 sibling, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread From: Igor Grinberg @ 2015-01-21 12:01 UTC (permalink / raw) To: u-boot On 01/21/15 13:09, Peng Fan wrote: > Add a new entry in platdata structure and intialize > bank_index in mxc_plat array. > This new entry can avoid using `plat - mxc_plat` by using > `plat->bank_index`. > > Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <Peng.Fan@freescale.com> Acked-by: Igor Grinberg <grinberg@compulab.co.il> -- Regards, Igor. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 3/4] dm:gpio:mxc add a bank_index entry in platdata 2015-01-21 11:09 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 3/4] dm:gpio:mxc add a bank_index entry in platdata Peng Fan 2015-01-21 12:01 ` Igor Grinberg @ 2015-01-22 21:27 ` Simon Glass 1 sibling, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread From: Simon Glass @ 2015-01-22 21:27 UTC (permalink / raw) To: u-boot Hi, On 21 January 2015 at 04:09, Peng Fan <Peng.Fan@freescale.com> wrote: > Add a new entry in platdata structure and intialize > bank_index in mxc_plat array. > This new entry can avoid using `plat - mxc_plat` by using > `plat->bank_index`. > > Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <Peng.Fan@freescale.com> > --- > drivers/gpio/mxc_gpio.c | 17 +++++++++-------- > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpio/mxc_gpio.c b/drivers/gpio/mxc_gpio.c > index 8bb9e39..c52dd19 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpio/mxc_gpio.c > +++ b/drivers/gpio/mxc_gpio.c > @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ enum mxc_gpio_direction { > #define GPIO_PER_BANK 32 > > struct mxc_gpio_plat { > + int bank_index; > struct gpio_regs *regs; > }; > > @@ -259,19 +260,19 @@ static const struct dm_gpio_ops gpio_mxc_ops = { > }; > > static const struct mxc_gpio_plat mxc_plat[] = { > - { (struct gpio_regs *)GPIO1_BASE_ADDR }, > - { (struct gpio_regs *)GPIO2_BASE_ADDR }, > - { (struct gpio_regs *)GPIO3_BASE_ADDR }, > + { 0, (struct gpio_regs *)GPIO1_BASE_ADDR }, > + { 1, (struct gpio_regs *)GPIO2_BASE_ADDR }, > + { 2, (struct gpio_regs *)GPIO3_BASE_ADDR }, > #if defined(CONFIG_MX25) || defined(CONFIG_MX27) || defined(CONFIG_MX51) || \ > defined(CONFIG_MX53) || defined(CONFIG_MX6) > - { (struct gpio_regs *)GPIO4_BASE_ADDR }, > + { 3, (struct gpio_regs *)GPIO4_BASE_ADDR }, > #endif > #if defined(CONFIG_MX27) || defined(CONFIG_MX53) || defined(CONFIG_MX6) > - { (struct gpio_regs *)GPIO5_BASE_ADDR }, > - { (struct gpio_regs *)GPIO6_BASE_ADDR }, > + { 4, (struct gpio_regs *)GPIO5_BASE_ADDR }, > + { 5, (struct gpio_regs *)GPIO6_BASE_ADDR }, > #endif > #if defined(CONFIG_MX53) || defined(CONFIG_MX6) > - { (struct gpio_regs *)GPIO7_BASE_ADDR }, > + { 6, (struct gpio_regs *)GPIO7_BASE_ADDR }, Is it possible to drop these casts? Or should that be another patch? > #endif > }; > > @@ -283,7 +284,7 @@ static int mxc_gpio_probe(struct udevice *dev) > int banknum; > char name[18], *str; > > - banknum = plat - mxc_plat; > + banknum = plat->bank_index; > sprintf(name, "GPIO%d_", banknum + 1); > str = strdup(name); > if (!str) > -- > 1.8.4 > > Regards, Simon ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 4/4] dm:gpio:mxc add DT support 2015-01-21 11:09 [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 0/4] dm:gpio:mxc add DT support Peng Fan ` (2 preceding siblings ...) 2015-01-21 11:09 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 3/4] dm:gpio:mxc add a bank_index entry in platdata Peng Fan @ 2015-01-21 11:09 ` Peng Fan 2015-01-22 1:06 ` Peng Fan 2015-01-22 21:26 ` Simon Glass 3 siblings, 2 replies; 18+ messages in thread From: Peng Fan @ 2015-01-21 11:09 UTC (permalink / raw) To: u-boot This patch add DT support for mxc gpio driver. There are one place using CONFIG_OF_CONTROL macro. 1. The U_BOOT_DEVICES and mxc_plat array are complied out. To DT, platdata is alloced using calloc, so there is no need to use mxc_plat. The following situations are tested, and all work fine: 1. with DM, without DT 2. with DM and DT 3. without DM Since device tree has not been upstreamed, if want to test this patch. The followings need to be done. + pieces of code does not gpio_request when using gpio_direction_xxx and etc, need to request gpio. + move the gpio settings from board_early_init_f to board_init + define CONFIG_DM ,CONFIG_DM_GPIO and CONFIG_OF_CONTROL + Add device tree file and do related configuration in `make ARCH=arm menuconfig` These will be done in future patches by step. Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <Peng.Fan@freescale.com> --- drivers/gpio/mxc_gpio.c | 69 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------ 1 file changed, 52 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpio/mxc_gpio.c b/drivers/gpio/mxc_gpio.c index c52dd19..0766b78 100644 --- a/drivers/gpio/mxc_gpio.c +++ b/drivers/gpio/mxc_gpio.c @@ -151,6 +151,9 @@ int gpio_direction_output(unsigned gpio, int value) #endif #ifdef CONFIG_DM_GPIO +#include <fdtdec.h> +DECLARE_GLOBAL_DATA_PTR; + static int mxc_gpio_is_output(struct gpio_regs *regs, int offset) { u32 val; @@ -259,23 +262,6 @@ static const struct dm_gpio_ops gpio_mxc_ops = { .get_function = mxc_gpio_get_function, }; -static const struct mxc_gpio_plat mxc_plat[] = { - { 0, (struct gpio_regs *)GPIO1_BASE_ADDR }, - { 1, (struct gpio_regs *)GPIO2_BASE_ADDR }, - { 2, (struct gpio_regs *)GPIO3_BASE_ADDR }, -#if defined(CONFIG_MX25) || defined(CONFIG_MX27) || defined(CONFIG_MX51) || \ - defined(CONFIG_MX53) || defined(CONFIG_MX6) - { 3, (struct gpio_regs *)GPIO4_BASE_ADDR }, -#endif -#if defined(CONFIG_MX27) || defined(CONFIG_MX53) || defined(CONFIG_MX6) - { 4, (struct gpio_regs *)GPIO5_BASE_ADDR }, - { 5, (struct gpio_regs *)GPIO6_BASE_ADDR }, -#endif -#if defined(CONFIG_MX53) || defined(CONFIG_MX6) - { 6, (struct gpio_regs *)GPIO7_BASE_ADDR }, -#endif -}; - static int mxc_gpio_probe(struct udevice *dev) { struct mxc_bank_info *bank = dev_get_priv(dev); @@ -296,12 +282,60 @@ static int mxc_gpio_probe(struct udevice *dev) return 0; } +static int mxc_gpio_bind(struct udevice *device) +{ + struct mxc_gpio_plat *plat = device->platdata; + struct gpio_regs *regs; + + if (plat) + return 0; + + regs = dev_get_addr(device); + if (!regs) + return -ENXIO; + + plat = calloc(1, sizeof(*plat)); + if (!plat) + return -ENOMEM; + + plat->regs = regs; + plat->bank_index = device->req_seq; + device->platdata = plat; + + return 0; +} + +static const struct udevice_id mxc_gpio_ids[] = { + { .compatible = "fsl,imx35-gpio" }, + { } +}; + U_BOOT_DRIVER(gpio_mxc) = { .name = "gpio_mxc", .id = UCLASS_GPIO, .ops = &gpio_mxc_ops, .probe = mxc_gpio_probe, .priv_auto_alloc_size = sizeof(struct mxc_bank_info), + .of_match = mxc_gpio_ids, + .bind = mxc_gpio_bind, +}; + +#ifndef CONFIG_OF_CONTROL +static const struct mxc_gpio_plat mxc_plat[] = { + { 0, (struct gpio_regs *)GPIO1_BASE_ADDR }, + { 1, (struct gpio_regs *)GPIO2_BASE_ADDR }, + { 2, (struct gpio_regs *)GPIO3_BASE_ADDR }, +#if defined(CONFIG_MX25) || defined(CONFIG_MX27) || defined(CONFIG_MX51) || \ + defined(CONFIG_MX53) || defined(CONFIG_MX6) + { 3, (struct gpio_regs *)GPIO4_BASE_ADDR }, +#endif +#if defined(CONFIG_MX27) || defined(CONFIG_MX53) || defined(CONFIG_MX6) + { 4, (struct gpio_regs *)GPIO5_BASE_ADDR }, + { 5, (struct gpio_regs *)GPIO6_BASE_ADDR }, +#endif +#if defined(CONFIG_MX53) || defined(CONFIG_MX6) + { 6, (struct gpio_regs *)GPIO7_BASE_ADDR }, +#endif }; U_BOOT_DEVICES(mxc_gpios) = { @@ -321,3 +355,4 @@ U_BOOT_DEVICES(mxc_gpios) = { #endif }; #endif +#endif -- 1.8.4 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 4/4] dm:gpio:mxc add DT support 2015-01-21 11:09 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 4/4] dm:gpio:mxc add DT support Peng Fan @ 2015-01-22 1:06 ` Peng Fan 2015-01-22 8:38 ` Igor Grinberg 2015-01-22 21:26 ` Simon Glass 1 sibling, 1 reply; 18+ messages in thread From: Peng Fan @ 2015-01-22 1:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: u-boot Hi Igor, Just kindly remind, did you miss this one? Since you ack the other patches in this patch set. On 1/21/2015 7:09 PM, Peng Fan wrote: > This patch add DT support for mxc gpio driver. > > There are one place using CONFIG_OF_CONTROL macro. > 1. The U_BOOT_DEVICES and mxc_plat array are complied out. To DT, > platdata is alloced using calloc, so there is no need to use mxc_plat. > > The following situations are tested, and all work fine: > 1. with DM, without DT > 2. with DM and DT > 3. without DM > Since device tree has not been upstreamed, if want to test this patch. > The followings need to be done. > + pieces of code does not gpio_request when using gpio_direction_xxx and > etc, need to request gpio. > + move the gpio settings from board_early_init_f to board_init > + define CONFIG_DM ,CONFIG_DM_GPIO and CONFIG_OF_CONTROL > + Add device tree file and do related configuration in > `make ARCH=arm menuconfig` > These will be done in future patches by step. > > Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <Peng.Fan@freescale.com> > --- > drivers/gpio/mxc_gpio.c | 69 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------ > 1 file changed, 52 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpio/mxc_gpio.c b/drivers/gpio/mxc_gpio.c > index c52dd19..0766b78 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpio/mxc_gpio.c > +++ b/drivers/gpio/mxc_gpio.c > @@ -151,6 +151,9 @@ int gpio_direction_output(unsigned gpio, int value) > #endif > > #ifdef CONFIG_DM_GPIO > +#include <fdtdec.h> > +DECLARE_GLOBAL_DATA_PTR; > + > static int mxc_gpio_is_output(struct gpio_regs *regs, int offset) > { > u32 val; > @@ -259,23 +262,6 @@ static const struct dm_gpio_ops gpio_mxc_ops = { > .get_function = mxc_gpio_get_function, > }; > > -static const struct mxc_gpio_plat mxc_plat[] = { > - { 0, (struct gpio_regs *)GPIO1_BASE_ADDR }, > - { 1, (struct gpio_regs *)GPIO2_BASE_ADDR }, > - { 2, (struct gpio_regs *)GPIO3_BASE_ADDR }, > -#if defined(CONFIG_MX25) || defined(CONFIG_MX27) || defined(CONFIG_MX51) || \ > - defined(CONFIG_MX53) || defined(CONFIG_MX6) > - { 3, (struct gpio_regs *)GPIO4_BASE_ADDR }, > -#endif > -#if defined(CONFIG_MX27) || defined(CONFIG_MX53) || defined(CONFIG_MX6) > - { 4, (struct gpio_regs *)GPIO5_BASE_ADDR }, > - { 5, (struct gpio_regs *)GPIO6_BASE_ADDR }, > -#endif > -#if defined(CONFIG_MX53) || defined(CONFIG_MX6) > - { 6, (struct gpio_regs *)GPIO7_BASE_ADDR }, > -#endif > -}; > - > static int mxc_gpio_probe(struct udevice *dev) > { > struct mxc_bank_info *bank = dev_get_priv(dev); > @@ -296,12 +282,60 @@ static int mxc_gpio_probe(struct udevice *dev) > return 0; > } > > +static int mxc_gpio_bind(struct udevice *device) > +{ > + struct mxc_gpio_plat *plat = device->platdata; > + struct gpio_regs *regs; > + > + if (plat) > + return 0; > + > + regs = dev_get_addr(device); > + if (!regs) > + return -ENXIO; > + > + plat = calloc(1, sizeof(*plat)); > + if (!plat) > + return -ENOMEM; > + > + plat->regs = regs; > + plat->bank_index = device->req_seq; > + device->platdata = plat; > + > + return 0; > +} > + > +static const struct udevice_id mxc_gpio_ids[] = { > + { .compatible = "fsl,imx35-gpio" }, > + { } > +}; > + > U_BOOT_DRIVER(gpio_mxc) = { > .name = "gpio_mxc", > .id = UCLASS_GPIO, > .ops = &gpio_mxc_ops, > .probe = mxc_gpio_probe, > .priv_auto_alloc_size = sizeof(struct mxc_bank_info), > + .of_match = mxc_gpio_ids, > + .bind = mxc_gpio_bind, > +}; > + > +#ifndef CONFIG_OF_CONTROL > +static const struct mxc_gpio_plat mxc_plat[] = { > + { 0, (struct gpio_regs *)GPIO1_BASE_ADDR }, > + { 1, (struct gpio_regs *)GPIO2_BASE_ADDR }, > + { 2, (struct gpio_regs *)GPIO3_BASE_ADDR }, > +#if defined(CONFIG_MX25) || defined(CONFIG_MX27) || defined(CONFIG_MX51) || \ > + defined(CONFIG_MX53) || defined(CONFIG_MX6) > + { 3, (struct gpio_regs *)GPIO4_BASE_ADDR }, > +#endif > +#if defined(CONFIG_MX27) || defined(CONFIG_MX53) || defined(CONFIG_MX6) > + { 4, (struct gpio_regs *)GPIO5_BASE_ADDR }, > + { 5, (struct gpio_regs *)GPIO6_BASE_ADDR }, > +#endif > +#if defined(CONFIG_MX53) || defined(CONFIG_MX6) > + { 6, (struct gpio_regs *)GPIO7_BASE_ADDR }, > +#endif > }; > > U_BOOT_DEVICES(mxc_gpios) = { > @@ -321,3 +355,4 @@ U_BOOT_DEVICES(mxc_gpios) = { > #endif > }; > #endif > +#endif Thanks, Peng. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 4/4] dm:gpio:mxc add DT support 2015-01-22 1:06 ` Peng Fan @ 2015-01-22 8:38 ` Igor Grinberg 2015-01-22 18:56 ` Peng Fan 0 siblings, 1 reply; 18+ messages in thread From: Igor Grinberg @ 2015-01-22 8:38 UTC (permalink / raw) To: u-boot Hi Peng, On 01/22/15 03:06, Peng Fan wrote: > Hi Igor, > > Just kindly remind, did you miss this one? Since you ack the other patches in this patch set. Nope, I did not miss it. I just haven't looked at it yet... > > On 1/21/2015 7:09 PM, Peng Fan wrote: >> This patch add DT support for mxc gpio driver. >> >> There are one place using CONFIG_OF_CONTROL macro. >> 1. The U_BOOT_DEVICES and mxc_plat array are complied out. To DT, >> platdata is alloced using calloc, so there is no need to use mxc_plat. >> >> The following situations are tested, and all work fine: >> 1. with DM, without DT >> 2. with DM and DT >> 3. without DM >> Since device tree has not been upstreamed, if want to test this patch. >> The followings need to be done. >> + pieces of code does not gpio_request when using gpio_direction_xxx and >> etc, need to request gpio. >> + move the gpio settings from board_early_init_f to board_init >> + define CONFIG_DM ,CONFIG_DM_GPIO and CONFIG_OF_CONTROL >> + Add device tree file and do related configuration in >> `make ARCH=arm menuconfig` >> These will be done in future patches by step. >> >> Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <Peng.Fan@freescale.com> Besides the question below, looks good. >> --- >> drivers/gpio/mxc_gpio.c | 69 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------ >> 1 file changed, 52 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/mxc_gpio.c b/drivers/gpio/mxc_gpio.c >> index c52dd19..0766b78 100644 >> --- a/drivers/gpio/mxc_gpio.c >> +++ b/drivers/gpio/mxc_gpio.c >> @@ -151,6 +151,9 @@ int gpio_direction_output(unsigned gpio, int value) >> #endif >> #ifdef CONFIG_DM_GPIO >> +#include <fdtdec.h> >> +DECLARE_GLOBAL_DATA_PTR; >> + >> static int mxc_gpio_is_output(struct gpio_regs *regs, int offset) >> { >> u32 val; >> @@ -259,23 +262,6 @@ static const struct dm_gpio_ops gpio_mxc_ops = { >> .get_function = mxc_gpio_get_function, >> }; >> -static const struct mxc_gpio_plat mxc_plat[] = { >> - { 0, (struct gpio_regs *)GPIO1_BASE_ADDR }, >> - { 1, (struct gpio_regs *)GPIO2_BASE_ADDR }, >> - { 2, (struct gpio_regs *)GPIO3_BASE_ADDR }, >> -#if defined(CONFIG_MX25) || defined(CONFIG_MX27) || defined(CONFIG_MX51) || \ >> - defined(CONFIG_MX53) || defined(CONFIG_MX6) >> - { 3, (struct gpio_regs *)GPIO4_BASE_ADDR }, >> -#endif >> -#if defined(CONFIG_MX27) || defined(CONFIG_MX53) || defined(CONFIG_MX6) >> - { 4, (struct gpio_regs *)GPIO5_BASE_ADDR }, >> - { 5, (struct gpio_regs *)GPIO6_BASE_ADDR }, >> -#endif >> -#if defined(CONFIG_MX53) || defined(CONFIG_MX6) >> - { 6, (struct gpio_regs *)GPIO7_BASE_ADDR }, >> -#endif >> -}; >> - >> static int mxc_gpio_probe(struct udevice *dev) >> { >> struct mxc_bank_info *bank = dev_get_priv(dev); >> @@ -296,12 +282,60 @@ static int mxc_gpio_probe(struct udevice *dev) >> return 0; >> } >> +static int mxc_gpio_bind(struct udevice *device) >> +{ >> + struct mxc_gpio_plat *plat = device->platdata; >> + struct gpio_regs *regs; >> + >> + if (plat) >> + return 0; >> + >> + regs = dev_get_addr(device); >> + if (!regs) >> + return -ENXIO; >> + >> + plat = calloc(1, sizeof(*plat)); >> + if (!plat) >> + return -ENOMEM; >> + >> + plat->regs = regs; >> + plat->bank_index = device->req_seq; Can we assume that in mxc_gpio case, device->req_seq will never equal -1? >> + device->platdata = plat; >> + >> + return 0; >> +} >> + >> +static const struct udevice_id mxc_gpio_ids[] = { >> + { .compatible = "fsl,imx35-gpio" }, >> + { } >> +}; >> + >> U_BOOT_DRIVER(gpio_mxc) = { >> .name = "gpio_mxc", >> .id = UCLASS_GPIO, >> .ops = &gpio_mxc_ops, >> .probe = mxc_gpio_probe, >> .priv_auto_alloc_size = sizeof(struct mxc_bank_info), >> + .of_match = mxc_gpio_ids, >> + .bind = mxc_gpio_bind, >> +}; >> + >> +#ifndef CONFIG_OF_CONTROL >> +static const struct mxc_gpio_plat mxc_plat[] = { >> + { 0, (struct gpio_regs *)GPIO1_BASE_ADDR }, >> + { 1, (struct gpio_regs *)GPIO2_BASE_ADDR }, >> + { 2, (struct gpio_regs *)GPIO3_BASE_ADDR }, >> +#if defined(CONFIG_MX25) || defined(CONFIG_MX27) || defined(CONFIG_MX51) || \ >> + defined(CONFIG_MX53) || defined(CONFIG_MX6) >> + { 3, (struct gpio_regs *)GPIO4_BASE_ADDR }, >> +#endif >> +#if defined(CONFIG_MX27) || defined(CONFIG_MX53) || defined(CONFIG_MX6) >> + { 4, (struct gpio_regs *)GPIO5_BASE_ADDR }, >> + { 5, (struct gpio_regs *)GPIO6_BASE_ADDR }, >> +#endif >> +#if defined(CONFIG_MX53) || defined(CONFIG_MX6) >> + { 6, (struct gpio_regs *)GPIO7_BASE_ADDR }, >> +#endif >> }; >> U_BOOT_DEVICES(mxc_gpios) = { >> @@ -321,3 +355,4 @@ U_BOOT_DEVICES(mxc_gpios) = { >> #endif >> }; >> #endif >> +#endif > Thanks, > Peng. > -- Regards, Igor. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 4/4] dm:gpio:mxc add DT support 2015-01-22 8:38 ` Igor Grinberg @ 2015-01-22 18:56 ` Peng Fan 0 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread From: Peng Fan @ 2015-01-22 18:56 UTC (permalink / raw) To: u-boot Hi, Igor Reply below. On 1/22/2015 4:38 PM, Igor Grinberg wrote: > Hi Peng, > > On 01/22/15 03:06, Peng Fan wrote: >> Hi Igor, >> >> Just kindly remind, did you miss this one? Since you ack the other patches in this patch set. > Nope, I did not miss it. > I just haven't looked at it yet... > >> On 1/21/2015 7:09 PM, Peng Fan wrote: >>> This patch add DT support for mxc gpio driver. >>> >>> There are one place using CONFIG_OF_CONTROL macro. >>> 1. The U_BOOT_DEVICES and mxc_plat array are complied out. To DT, >>> platdata is alloced using calloc, so there is no need to use mxc_plat. >>> >>> The following situations are tested, and all work fine: >>> 1. with DM, without DT >>> 2. with DM and DT >>> 3. without DM >>> Since device tree has not been upstreamed, if want to test this patch. >>> The followings need to be done. >>> + pieces of code does not gpio_request when using gpio_direction_xxx and >>> etc, need to request gpio. >>> + move the gpio settings from board_early_init_f to board_init >>> + define CONFIG_DM ,CONFIG_DM_GPIO and CONFIG_OF_CONTROL >>> + Add device tree file and do related configuration in >>> `make ARCH=arm menuconfig` >>> These will be done in future patches by step. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <Peng.Fan@freescale.com> > Besides the question below, looks good. > >>> --- >>> drivers/gpio/mxc_gpio.c | 69 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------ >>> 1 file changed, 52 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/mxc_gpio.c b/drivers/gpio/mxc_gpio.c >>> index c52dd19..0766b78 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/gpio/mxc_gpio.c >>> +++ b/drivers/gpio/mxc_gpio.c >>> @@ -151,6 +151,9 @@ int gpio_direction_output(unsigned gpio, int value) >>> #endif >>> #ifdef CONFIG_DM_GPIO >>> +#include <fdtdec.h> >>> +DECLARE_GLOBAL_DATA_PTR; >>> + >>> static int mxc_gpio_is_output(struct gpio_regs *regs, int offset) >>> { >>> u32 val; >>> @@ -259,23 +262,6 @@ static const struct dm_gpio_ops gpio_mxc_ops = { >>> .get_function = mxc_gpio_get_function, >>> }; >>> -static const struct mxc_gpio_plat mxc_plat[] = { >>> - { 0, (struct gpio_regs *)GPIO1_BASE_ADDR }, >>> - { 1, (struct gpio_regs *)GPIO2_BASE_ADDR }, >>> - { 2, (struct gpio_regs *)GPIO3_BASE_ADDR }, >>> -#if defined(CONFIG_MX25) || defined(CONFIG_MX27) || defined(CONFIG_MX51) || \ >>> - defined(CONFIG_MX53) || defined(CONFIG_MX6) >>> - { 3, (struct gpio_regs *)GPIO4_BASE_ADDR }, >>> -#endif >>> -#if defined(CONFIG_MX27) || defined(CONFIG_MX53) || defined(CONFIG_MX6) >>> - { 4, (struct gpio_regs *)GPIO5_BASE_ADDR }, >>> - { 5, (struct gpio_regs *)GPIO6_BASE_ADDR }, >>> -#endif >>> -#if defined(CONFIG_MX53) || defined(CONFIG_MX6) >>> - { 6, (struct gpio_regs *)GPIO7_BASE_ADDR }, >>> -#endif >>> -}; >>> - >>> static int mxc_gpio_probe(struct udevice *dev) >>> { >>> struct mxc_bank_info *bank = dev_get_priv(dev); >>> @@ -296,12 +282,60 @@ static int mxc_gpio_probe(struct udevice *dev) >>> return 0; >>> } >>> +static int mxc_gpio_bind(struct udevice *device) >>> +{ >>> + struct mxc_gpio_plat *plat = device->platdata; >>> + struct gpio_regs *regs; >>> + >>> + if (plat) >>> + return 0; >>> + >>> + regs = dev_get_addr(device); >>> + if (!regs) >>> + return -ENXIO; >>> + >>> + plat = calloc(1, sizeof(*plat)); >>> + if (!plat) >>> + return -ENOMEM; >>> + >>> + plat->regs = regs; >>> + plat->bank_index = device->req_seq; > Can we assume that in mxc_gpio case, device->req_seq will never equal -1? To NO DT situation, "if (plat) return0;" will directly return, because plat is staticlly intialized in source file. To DT, in aliases, "gpio0=&gpio1" and etc should be added, to make req_seq work. If "reg" property or "alises" are not provied, req_seq will be -1. Here I want aliases, because want bank_index from 0 to max bank, but this can not be guaranteed. If reg property is not provided, dev_get_addr will return error. And plat->bank_index = device->req_seq will not be executed. If reg property is provided, but alises "gpiox=&gpioy" are not provied, there is not a good way to check req_seq exceeds max bank, since I do not want to include `#define xxMAX_BANK yy`. So I did not test this "req_seq < 0 " situation. > >>> + device->platdata = plat; >>> + >>> + return 0; >>> +} >>> + >>> +static const struct udevice_id mxc_gpio_ids[] = { >>> + { .compatible = "fsl,imx35-gpio" }, >>> + { } >>> +}; >>> + >>> U_BOOT_DRIVER(gpio_mxc) = { >>> .name = "gpio_mxc", >>> .id = UCLASS_GPIO, >>> .ops = &gpio_mxc_ops, >>> .probe = mxc_gpio_probe, >>> .priv_auto_alloc_size = sizeof(struct mxc_bank_info), >>> + .of_match = mxc_gpio_ids, >>> + .bind = mxc_gpio_bind, >>> +}; >>> + >>> +#ifndef CONFIG_OF_CONTROL >>> +static const struct mxc_gpio_plat mxc_plat[] = { >>> + { 0, (struct gpio_regs *)GPIO1_BASE_ADDR }, >>> + { 1, (struct gpio_regs *)GPIO2_BASE_ADDR }, >>> + { 2, (struct gpio_regs *)GPIO3_BASE_ADDR }, >>> +#if defined(CONFIG_MX25) || defined(CONFIG_MX27) || defined(CONFIG_MX51) || \ >>> + defined(CONFIG_MX53) || defined(CONFIG_MX6) >>> + { 3, (struct gpio_regs *)GPIO4_BASE_ADDR }, >>> +#endif >>> +#if defined(CONFIG_MX27) || defined(CONFIG_MX53) || defined(CONFIG_MX6) >>> + { 4, (struct gpio_regs *)GPIO5_BASE_ADDR }, >>> + { 5, (struct gpio_regs *)GPIO6_BASE_ADDR }, >>> +#endif >>> +#if defined(CONFIG_MX53) || defined(CONFIG_MX6) >>> + { 6, (struct gpio_regs *)GPIO7_BASE_ADDR }, >>> +#endif >>> }; >>> U_BOOT_DEVICES(mxc_gpios) = { >>> @@ -321,3 +355,4 @@ U_BOOT_DEVICES(mxc_gpios) = { >>> #endif >>> }; >>> #endif >>> +#endif >> Thanks, >> Peng. >> Thanks, Peng. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 4/4] dm:gpio:mxc add DT support 2015-01-21 11:09 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 4/4] dm:gpio:mxc add DT support Peng Fan 2015-01-22 1:06 ` Peng Fan @ 2015-01-22 21:26 ` Simon Glass 2015-01-24 14:34 ` Peng Fan 1 sibling, 1 reply; 18+ messages in thread From: Simon Glass @ 2015-01-22 21:26 UTC (permalink / raw) To: u-boot Hi Peng, On 21 January 2015 at 04:09, Peng Fan <Peng.Fan@freescale.com> wrote: > This patch add DT support for mxc gpio driver. > > There are one place using CONFIG_OF_CONTROL macro. > 1. The U_BOOT_DEVICES and mxc_plat array are complied out. To DT, > platdata is alloced using calloc, so there is no need to use mxc_plat. > > The following situations are tested, and all work fine: > 1. with DM, without DT > 2. with DM and DT > 3. without DM > Since device tree has not been upstreamed, if want to test this patch. > The followings need to be done. > + pieces of code does not gpio_request when using gpio_direction_xxx and > etc, need to request gpio. > + move the gpio settings from board_early_init_f to board_init > + define CONFIG_DM ,CONFIG_DM_GPIO and CONFIG_OF_CONTROL > + Add device tree file and do related configuration in > `make ARCH=arm menuconfig` > These will be done in future patches by step. > > Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <Peng.Fan@freescale.com> > --- > drivers/gpio/mxc_gpio.c | 69 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------ > 1 file changed, 52 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpio/mxc_gpio.c b/drivers/gpio/mxc_gpio.c > index c52dd19..0766b78 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpio/mxc_gpio.c > +++ b/drivers/gpio/mxc_gpio.c > @@ -151,6 +151,9 @@ int gpio_direction_output(unsigned gpio, int value) > #endif > > #ifdef CONFIG_DM_GPIO > +#include <fdtdec.h> > +DECLARE_GLOBAL_DATA_PTR; > + > static int mxc_gpio_is_output(struct gpio_regs *regs, int offset) > { > u32 val; > @@ -259,23 +262,6 @@ static const struct dm_gpio_ops gpio_mxc_ops = { > .get_function = mxc_gpio_get_function, > }; > > -static const struct mxc_gpio_plat mxc_plat[] = { > - { 0, (struct gpio_regs *)GPIO1_BASE_ADDR }, > - { 1, (struct gpio_regs *)GPIO2_BASE_ADDR }, > - { 2, (struct gpio_regs *)GPIO3_BASE_ADDR }, > -#if defined(CONFIG_MX25) || defined(CONFIG_MX27) || defined(CONFIG_MX51) || \ > - defined(CONFIG_MX53) || defined(CONFIG_MX6) > - { 3, (struct gpio_regs *)GPIO4_BASE_ADDR }, > -#endif > -#if defined(CONFIG_MX27) || defined(CONFIG_MX53) || defined(CONFIG_MX6) > - { 4, (struct gpio_regs *)GPIO5_BASE_ADDR }, > - { 5, (struct gpio_regs *)GPIO6_BASE_ADDR }, > -#endif > -#if defined(CONFIG_MX53) || defined(CONFIG_MX6) > - { 6, (struct gpio_regs *)GPIO7_BASE_ADDR }, > -#endif > -}; > - > static int mxc_gpio_probe(struct udevice *dev) > { > struct mxc_bank_info *bank = dev_get_priv(dev); > @@ -296,12 +282,60 @@ static int mxc_gpio_probe(struct udevice *dev) > return 0; > } > > +static int mxc_gpio_bind(struct udevice *device) s/device/dev/ as that is the convention. > +{ > + struct mxc_gpio_plat *plat = device->platdata; > + struct gpio_regs *regs; > + > + if (plat) > + return 0; Please add a comment as to why. > + > + regs = dev_get_addr(device); > + if (!regs) > + return -ENXIO; -ENODEV I think? > + > + plat = calloc(1, sizeof(*plat)); > + if (!plat) > + return -ENOMEM; Can you use the auto-alloc feature instead? Trying to keep memory allocations out of drivers unless it is for buffers, etc. > + > + plat->regs = regs; > + plat->bank_index = device->req_seq; Why store this? You can access it anytime using the device pointer. > + device->platdata = plat; > + > + return 0; > +} > + > +static const struct udevice_id mxc_gpio_ids[] = { > + { .compatible = "fsl,imx35-gpio" }, > + { } > +}; > + > U_BOOT_DRIVER(gpio_mxc) = { > .name = "gpio_mxc", > .id = UCLASS_GPIO, > .ops = &gpio_mxc_ops, > .probe = mxc_gpio_probe, > .priv_auto_alloc_size = sizeof(struct mxc_bank_info), > + .of_match = mxc_gpio_ids, Masahiro added a function for this.: .of_match = of_match_ptr(mxc_gpio_ids), But I'm not completely sure if this is wanted, since you include this information even when not using device tree. > + .bind = mxc_gpio_bind, > +}; > + > +#ifndef CONFIG_OF_CONTROL > +static const struct mxc_gpio_plat mxc_plat[] = { > + { 0, (struct gpio_regs *)GPIO1_BASE_ADDR }, > + { 1, (struct gpio_regs *)GPIO2_BASE_ADDR }, > + { 2, (struct gpio_regs *)GPIO3_BASE_ADDR }, > +#if defined(CONFIG_MX25) || defined(CONFIG_MX27) || defined(CONFIG_MX51) || \ > + defined(CONFIG_MX53) || defined(CONFIG_MX6) > + { 3, (struct gpio_regs *)GPIO4_BASE_ADDR }, > +#endif > +#if defined(CONFIG_MX27) || defined(CONFIG_MX53) || defined(CONFIG_MX6) > + { 4, (struct gpio_regs *)GPIO5_BASE_ADDR }, > + { 5, (struct gpio_regs *)GPIO6_BASE_ADDR }, > +#endif > +#if defined(CONFIG_MX53) || defined(CONFIG_MX6) > + { 6, (struct gpio_regs *)GPIO7_BASE_ADDR }, > +#endif Can we remove the casts by changing the type to ulong? > }; > > U_BOOT_DEVICES(mxc_gpios) = { > @@ -321,3 +355,4 @@ U_BOOT_DEVICES(mxc_gpios) = { > #endif > }; > #endif > +#endif > -- > 1.8.4 > > Regards, Simon ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 4/4] dm:gpio:mxc add DT support 2015-01-22 21:26 ` Simon Glass @ 2015-01-24 14:34 ` Peng Fan 2015-01-26 13:38 ` Simon Glass 0 siblings, 1 reply; 18+ messages in thread From: Peng Fan @ 2015-01-24 14:34 UTC (permalink / raw) To: u-boot Hi Simon, On 1/23/2015 5:26 AM, Simon Glass wrote: > Hi Peng, > > On 21 January 2015 at 04:09, Peng Fan <Peng.Fan@freescale.com> wrote: >> This patch add DT support for mxc gpio driver. >> >> There are one place using CONFIG_OF_CONTROL macro. >> 1. The U_BOOT_DEVICES and mxc_plat array are complied out. To DT, >> platdata is alloced using calloc, so there is no need to use mxc_plat. >> >> The following situations are tested, and all work fine: >> 1. with DM, without DT >> 2. with DM and DT >> 3. without DM >> Since device tree has not been upstreamed, if want to test this patch. >> The followings need to be done. >> + pieces of code does not gpio_request when using gpio_direction_xxx and >> etc, need to request gpio. >> + move the gpio settings from board_early_init_f to board_init >> + define CONFIG_DM ,CONFIG_DM_GPIO and CONFIG_OF_CONTROL >> + Add device tree file and do related configuration in >> `make ARCH=arm menuconfig` >> These will be done in future patches by step. >> >> Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <Peng.Fan@freescale.com> >> --- >> drivers/gpio/mxc_gpio.c | 69 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------ >> 1 file changed, 52 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/mxc_gpio.c b/drivers/gpio/mxc_gpio.c >> index c52dd19..0766b78 100644 >> --- a/drivers/gpio/mxc_gpio.c >> +++ b/drivers/gpio/mxc_gpio.c >> @@ -151,6 +151,9 @@ int gpio_direction_output(unsigned gpio, int value) >> #endif >> >> #ifdef CONFIG_DM_GPIO >> +#include <fdtdec.h> >> +DECLARE_GLOBAL_DATA_PTR; >> + >> static int mxc_gpio_is_output(struct gpio_regs *regs, int offset) >> { >> u32 val; >> @@ -259,23 +262,6 @@ static const struct dm_gpio_ops gpio_mxc_ops = { >> .get_function = mxc_gpio_get_function, >> }; >> >> -static const struct mxc_gpio_plat mxc_plat[] = { >> - { 0, (struct gpio_regs *)GPIO1_BASE_ADDR }, >> - { 1, (struct gpio_regs *)GPIO2_BASE_ADDR }, >> - { 2, (struct gpio_regs *)GPIO3_BASE_ADDR }, >> -#if defined(CONFIG_MX25) || defined(CONFIG_MX27) || defined(CONFIG_MX51) || \ >> - defined(CONFIG_MX53) || defined(CONFIG_MX6) >> - { 3, (struct gpio_regs *)GPIO4_BASE_ADDR }, >> -#endif >> -#if defined(CONFIG_MX27) || defined(CONFIG_MX53) || defined(CONFIG_MX6) >> - { 4, (struct gpio_regs *)GPIO5_BASE_ADDR }, >> - { 5, (struct gpio_regs *)GPIO6_BASE_ADDR }, >> -#endif >> -#if defined(CONFIG_MX53) || defined(CONFIG_MX6) >> - { 6, (struct gpio_regs *)GPIO7_BASE_ADDR }, >> -#endif >> -}; >> - >> static int mxc_gpio_probe(struct udevice *dev) >> { >> struct mxc_bank_info *bank = dev_get_priv(dev); >> @@ -296,12 +282,60 @@ static int mxc_gpio_probe(struct udevice *dev) >> return 0; >> } >> >> +static int mxc_gpio_bind(struct udevice *device) > s/device/dev/ as that is the convention. Will fix this. > >> +{ >> + struct mxc_gpio_plat *plat = device->platdata; >> + struct gpio_regs *regs; >> + >> + if (plat) >> + return 0; > Please add a comment as to why. Ok. > >> + >> + regs = dev_get_addr(device); >> + if (!regs) >> + return -ENXIO; > -ENODEV I think? Yeah. Right. >> + >> + plat = calloc(1, sizeof(*plat)); >> + if (!plat) >> + return -ENOMEM; > Can you use the auto-alloc feature instead? Trying to keep memory > allocations out of drivers unless it is for buffers, etc. I want the DM code can support DT and no DT. To no DT, platdata is defined in U_BOOT_DEVICES. If using auto-alloc feature, but DT is not supported, is it conflict with platdata in U_BOOT_DEVICES? > >> + >> + plat->regs = regs; >> + plat->bank_index = device->req_seq; > Why store this? You can access it anytime using the device pointer. To no DT, bank_index is statically intialized in mxc_plat array. I do not want to introudce `#ifdef CONFIG_OF_CONTROL` in probe function and introudce `if (dev->of_offset == -1)`, so store it to bank_index. To no DT, `if(plat) return 0;` will return. So plat->bank_index = device->req_seq will only effects for DT. Just want to support DT and no DT. > >> + device->platdata = plat; >> + >> + return 0; >> +} >> + >> +static const struct udevice_id mxc_gpio_ids[] = { >> + { .compatible = "fsl,imx35-gpio" }, >> + { } >> +}; >> + >> U_BOOT_DRIVER(gpio_mxc) = { >> .name = "gpio_mxc", >> .id = UCLASS_GPIO, >> .ops = &gpio_mxc_ops, >> .probe = mxc_gpio_probe, >> .priv_auto_alloc_size = sizeof(struct mxc_bank_info), >> + .of_match = mxc_gpio_ids, > Masahiro added a function for this.: > > .of_match = of_match_ptr(mxc_gpio_ids), > > But I'm not completely sure if this is wanted, since you include this > information even when not using device tree. Thanks,I'll try this. I am not sure whether using of_match_ptr will make compiler complain mxc_gpio_ids `defined but not used` for no DT, since `#ifdef xx` is not recommended to compiled out `mxc_gpio_ids` for no DT. > >> + .bind = mxc_gpio_bind, >> +}; >> + >> +#ifndef CONFIG_OF_CONTROL >> +static const struct mxc_gpio_plat mxc_plat[] = { >> + { 0, (struct gpio_regs *)GPIO1_BASE_ADDR }, >> + { 1, (struct gpio_regs *)GPIO2_BASE_ADDR }, >> + { 2, (struct gpio_regs *)GPIO3_BASE_ADDR }, >> +#if defined(CONFIG_MX25) || defined(CONFIG_MX27) || defined(CONFIG_MX51) || \ >> + defined(CONFIG_MX53) || defined(CONFIG_MX6) >> + { 3, (struct gpio_regs *)GPIO4_BASE_ADDR }, >> +#endif >> +#if defined(CONFIG_MX27) || defined(CONFIG_MX53) || defined(CONFIG_MX6) >> + { 4, (struct gpio_regs *)GPIO5_BASE_ADDR }, >> + { 5, (struct gpio_regs *)GPIO6_BASE_ADDR }, >> +#endif >> +#if defined(CONFIG_MX53) || defined(CONFIG_MX6) >> + { 6, (struct gpio_regs *)GPIO7_BASE_ADDR }, >> +#endif > Can we remove the casts by changing the type to ulong? Hmm, this patch is just to make this driver can support DT. This will introduce more change. Also, changing the type to ulong will change mxc_gpio_plat struct. If change the type to ulong, functions in this driver that uses platdata will casts it to `struct gpio_regs *`. So i'd like not to remove the casts, since remove them in mxc_plat will introduce casts in other functions which use the platdata. > >> }; >> >> U_BOOT_DEVICES(mxc_gpios) = { >> @@ -321,3 +355,4 @@ U_BOOT_DEVICES(mxc_gpios) = { >> #endif >> }; >> #endif >> +#endif >> -- >> 1.8.4 >> >> > Regards, > Simon Regards, Peng. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 4/4] dm:gpio:mxc add DT support 2015-01-24 14:34 ` Peng Fan @ 2015-01-26 13:38 ` Simon Glass 0 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread From: Simon Glass @ 2015-01-26 13:38 UTC (permalink / raw) To: u-boot Hi Peng, On 24 January 2015 at 07:34, Peng Fan <B51431@freescale.com> wrote: > Hi Simon, > > > On 1/23/2015 5:26 AM, Simon Glass wrote: >> >> Hi Peng, >> >> On 21 January 2015 at 04:09, Peng Fan <Peng.Fan@freescale.com> wrote: >>> >>> This patch add DT support for mxc gpio driver. >>> >>> There are one place using CONFIG_OF_CONTROL macro. >>> 1. The U_BOOT_DEVICES and mxc_plat array are complied out. To DT, >>> platdata is alloced using calloc, so there is no need to use >>> mxc_plat. >>> >>> The following situations are tested, and all work fine: >>> 1. with DM, without DT >>> 2. with DM and DT >>> 3. without DM >>> Since device tree has not been upstreamed, if want to test this patch. >>> The followings need to be done. >>> + pieces of code does not gpio_request when using gpio_direction_xxx >>> and >>> etc, need to request gpio. >>> + move the gpio settings from board_early_init_f to board_init >>> + define CONFIG_DM ,CONFIG_DM_GPIO and CONFIG_OF_CONTROL >>> + Add device tree file and do related configuration in >>> `make ARCH=arm menuconfig` >>> These will be done in future patches by step. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <Peng.Fan@freescale.com> >>> --- >>> drivers/gpio/mxc_gpio.c | 69 >>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------ >>> 1 file changed, 52 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/mxc_gpio.c b/drivers/gpio/mxc_gpio.c >>> index c52dd19..0766b78 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/gpio/mxc_gpio.c >>> +++ b/drivers/gpio/mxc_gpio.c >>> @@ -151,6 +151,9 @@ int gpio_direction_output(unsigned gpio, int value) >>> #endif >>> >>> #ifdef CONFIG_DM_GPIO >>> +#include <fdtdec.h> >>> +DECLARE_GLOBAL_DATA_PTR; >>> + >>> static int mxc_gpio_is_output(struct gpio_regs *regs, int offset) >>> { >>> u32 val; >>> @@ -259,23 +262,6 @@ static const struct dm_gpio_ops gpio_mxc_ops = { >>> .get_function = mxc_gpio_get_function, >>> }; >>> >>> -static const struct mxc_gpio_plat mxc_plat[] = { >>> - { 0, (struct gpio_regs *)GPIO1_BASE_ADDR }, >>> - { 1, (struct gpio_regs *)GPIO2_BASE_ADDR }, >>> - { 2, (struct gpio_regs *)GPIO3_BASE_ADDR }, >>> -#if defined(CONFIG_MX25) || defined(CONFIG_MX27) || defined(CONFIG_MX51) >>> || \ >>> - defined(CONFIG_MX53) || defined(CONFIG_MX6) >>> - { 3, (struct gpio_regs *)GPIO4_BASE_ADDR }, >>> -#endif >>> -#if defined(CONFIG_MX27) || defined(CONFIG_MX53) || defined(CONFIG_MX6) >>> - { 4, (struct gpio_regs *)GPIO5_BASE_ADDR }, >>> - { 5, (struct gpio_regs *)GPIO6_BASE_ADDR }, >>> -#endif >>> -#if defined(CONFIG_MX53) || defined(CONFIG_MX6) >>> - { 6, (struct gpio_regs *)GPIO7_BASE_ADDR }, >>> -#endif >>> -}; >>> - >>> static int mxc_gpio_probe(struct udevice *dev) >>> { >>> struct mxc_bank_info *bank = dev_get_priv(dev); >>> @@ -296,12 +282,60 @@ static int mxc_gpio_probe(struct udevice *dev) >>> return 0; >>> } >>> >>> +static int mxc_gpio_bind(struct udevice *device) >> >> s/device/dev/ as that is the convention. > > Will fix this. >> >> >>> +{ >>> + struct mxc_gpio_plat *plat = device->platdata; >>> + struct gpio_regs *regs; >>> + >>> + if (plat) >>> + return 0; >> >> Please add a comment as to why. > > Ok. >> >> >>> + >>> + regs = dev_get_addr(device); >>> + if (!regs) >>> + return -ENXIO; >> >> -ENODEV I think? > > Yeah. Right. >>> >>> + >>> + plat = calloc(1, sizeof(*plat)); >>> + if (!plat) >>> + return -ENOMEM; >> >> Can you use the auto-alloc feature instead? Trying to keep memory >> allocations out of drivers unless it is for buffers, etc. > > I want the DM code can support DT and no DT. To no DT, platdata is defined > in U_BOOT_DEVICES. > If using auto-alloc feature, but DT is not supported, is it conflict with > platdata in U_BOOT_DEVICES? Yes it will. But please add a TODO in the code to remove this when every board is converted to driver model and you don't need this. >> >> >>> + >>> + plat->regs = regs; >>> + plat->bank_index = device->req_seq; >> >> Why store this? You can access it anytime using the device pointer. > > To no DT, bank_index is statically intialized in mxc_plat array. I do not > want to introudce `#ifdef CONFIG_OF_CONTROL` in probe function and introudce > `if (dev->of_offset == -1)`, so > store it to bank_index. > To no DT, `if(plat) return 0;` will return. So plat->bank_index = > device->req_seq will only effects for DT. > Just want to support DT and no DT. OK I think I understand. >> >> >>> + device->platdata = plat; >>> + >>> + return 0; >>> +} >>> + >>> +static const struct udevice_id mxc_gpio_ids[] = { >>> + { .compatible = "fsl,imx35-gpio" }, >>> + { } >>> +}; >>> + >>> U_BOOT_DRIVER(gpio_mxc) = { >>> .name = "gpio_mxc", >>> .id = UCLASS_GPIO, >>> .ops = &gpio_mxc_ops, >>> .probe = mxc_gpio_probe, >>> .priv_auto_alloc_size = sizeof(struct mxc_bank_info), >>> + .of_match = mxc_gpio_ids, >> >> Masahiro added a function for this.: >> >> .of_match = of_match_ptr(mxc_gpio_ids), >> >> But I'm not completely sure if this is wanted, since you include this >> information even when not using device tree. > > Thanks,I'll try this. I am not sure whether using of_match_ptr will make > compiler complain mxc_gpio_ids `defined but not used` for no DT, since > `#ifdef xx` is not recommended to compiled out `mxc_gpio_ids` for no DT. Yes it will. What you have is OK. >> >> >>> + .bind = mxc_gpio_bind, >>> +}; >>> + >>> +#ifndef CONFIG_OF_CONTROL >>> +static const struct mxc_gpio_plat mxc_plat[] = { >>> + { 0, (struct gpio_regs *)GPIO1_BASE_ADDR }, >>> + { 1, (struct gpio_regs *)GPIO2_BASE_ADDR }, >>> + { 2, (struct gpio_regs *)GPIO3_BASE_ADDR }, >>> +#if defined(CONFIG_MX25) || defined(CONFIG_MX27) || defined(CONFIG_MX51) >>> || \ >>> + defined(CONFIG_MX53) || defined(CONFIG_MX6) >>> + { 3, (struct gpio_regs *)GPIO4_BASE_ADDR }, >>> +#endif >>> +#if defined(CONFIG_MX27) || defined(CONFIG_MX53) || defined(CONFIG_MX6) >>> + { 4, (struct gpio_regs *)GPIO5_BASE_ADDR }, >>> + { 5, (struct gpio_regs *)GPIO6_BASE_ADDR }, >>> +#endif >>> +#if defined(CONFIG_MX53) || defined(CONFIG_MX6) >>> + { 6, (struct gpio_regs *)GPIO7_BASE_ADDR }, >>> +#endif >> >> Can we remove the casts by changing the type to ulong? > > Hmm, this patch is just to make this driver can support DT. This will > introduce more change. Also, changing the type to ulong will change > mxc_gpio_plat struct. > If change the type to ulong, functions in this driver that uses platdata > will casts it to `struct gpio_regs *`. So i'd like not to remove the casts, > since remove them in mxc_plat will introduce casts in other functions which > use the platdata. OK. Something to think about later. In general a long line of casts indicates something should be fixed! Regards, Simon ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-02-06 15:45 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 18+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2015-01-21 11:09 [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 0/4] dm:gpio:mxc add DT support Peng Fan 2015-01-21 11:09 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 1/4] dm: introduce dev_get_addr interface Peng Fan 2015-01-21 11:58 ` Igor Grinberg 2015-01-22 21:25 ` Simon Glass 2015-02-06 6:44 ` Peng Fan 2015-02-06 15:45 ` Simon Glass 2015-01-21 11:09 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 2/4] dm: add dev_get_addr prototype Peng Fan 2015-01-21 11:59 ` Igor Grinberg 2015-01-21 11:09 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 3/4] dm:gpio:mxc add a bank_index entry in platdata Peng Fan 2015-01-21 12:01 ` Igor Grinberg 2015-01-22 21:27 ` Simon Glass 2015-01-21 11:09 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH v3 4/4] dm:gpio:mxc add DT support Peng Fan 2015-01-22 1:06 ` Peng Fan 2015-01-22 8:38 ` Igor Grinberg 2015-01-22 18:56 ` Peng Fan 2015-01-22 21:26 ` Simon Glass 2015-01-24 14:34 ` Peng Fan 2015-01-26 13:38 ` Simon Glass
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.