From: Michael Mueller <mimu@linux.vnet.ibm.com> To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Gleb Natapov <gleb@kernel.org>, Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>, Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>, "Jason J. Herne" <jjherne@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, Andreas Faerber <afaerber@suse.de>, Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>, Michael Mueller <mimu@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Subject: [RFC PATCH v2 09/15] cpu-model/s390: Add KVM VM attribute interface routines Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 15:24:07 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <1424183053-4310-10-git-send-email-mimu@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <1424183053-4310-1-git-send-email-mimu@linux.vnet.ibm.com> The patch implements routines to set and retrieve processor configuration data and to retrieve machine configuration data. The machine related data is used together with the cpu model facility lists to determine the list of supported cpu models of this host. The above mentioned routines have QEMU trace point instrumentation. Signed-off-by: Michael Mueller <mimu@linux.vnet.ibm.com> --- target-s390x/cpu-models.h | 39 ++++++++++++++++++ target-s390x/kvm.c | 102 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ trace-events | 3 ++ 3 files changed, 144 insertions(+) diff --git a/target-s390x/cpu-models.h b/target-s390x/cpu-models.h index 623a7b2..76b3456 100644 --- a/target-s390x/cpu-models.h +++ b/target-s390x/cpu-models.h @@ -45,6 +45,45 @@ typedef struct S390CPUAlias { char *model; } S390CPUAlias; +typedef struct S390ProcessorProps { + uint64_t cpuid; + uint16_t ibc; + uint8_t pad[6]; + uint64_t fac_list[S390_ARCH_FAC_LIST_SIZE_UINT64]; +} S390ProcessorProps; + +typedef struct S390MachineProps { + uint64_t cpuid; + uint32_t ibc_range; + uint8_t pad[4]; + uint64_t fac_list_mask[S390_ARCH_FAC_LIST_SIZE_UINT64]; + uint64_t fac_list[S390_ARCH_FAC_LIST_SIZE_UINT64]; +} S390MachineProps; + +#ifdef CONFIG_KVM +int kvm_s390_get_processor_props(S390ProcessorProps *prop); +int kvm_s390_set_processor_props(S390ProcessorProps *prop); +bool kvm_s390_cpu_classes_initialized(void); +bool kvm_s390_probe_mode(void); +#else +static inline int kvm_s390_get_processor_props(S390ProcessorProps *prob) +{ + return -ENOSYS; +} +static inline int kvm_s390_set_processor_props(S390ProcessorProps *prob) +{ + return -ENOSYS; +} +static inline bool kvm_s390_cpu_classes_initialized(void) +{ + return false; +} +static inline bool kvm_s390_probe_mode(void) +{ + return false; +} +#endif + /* * bits 0-7 : CMOS generation * bits 8-9 : reserved diff --git a/target-s390x/kvm.c b/target-s390x/kvm.c index 6f2d5b4..c518489 100644 --- a/target-s390x/kvm.c +++ b/target-s390x/kvm.c @@ -42,6 +42,7 @@ #include "qapi-event.h" #include "hw/s390x/s390-pci-inst.h" #include "hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.h" +#include "cpu-models.h" /* #define DEBUG_KVM */ @@ -117,6 +118,7 @@ const KVMCapabilityInfo kvm_arch_required_capabilities[] = { static int cap_sync_regs; static int cap_async_pf; +static bool cpu_classes_initialized; static void *legacy_s390_alloc(size_t size, uint64_t *align); @@ -172,6 +174,68 @@ static void kvm_s390_enable_cmma(KVMState *s) trace_kvm_enable_cmma(rc); } +static int cpu_model_get(KVMState *s, uint64_t attr, uint64_t addr) +{ + struct kvm_device_attr dev_attr = { + .group = KVM_S390_VM_CPU_MODEL, + .attr = attr, + .addr = addr, + }; + + return kvm_vm_ioctl(s, KVM_GET_DEVICE_ATTR, &dev_attr); +} + +static int cpu_model_set(KVMState *s, uint64_t attr, uint64_t addr) +{ + struct kvm_device_attr dev_attr = { + .group = KVM_S390_VM_CPU_MODEL, + .attr = attr, + .addr = addr, + }; + + return kvm_vm_ioctl(s, KVM_SET_DEVICE_ATTR, &dev_attr); +} + +static int has_cpu_model_call(KVMState *s, uint64_t attr) +{ + int rc; + struct kvm_device_attr dev_attr = { + .group = KVM_S390_VM_CPU_MODEL, + .attr = attr, + }; + + if (kvm_check_extension(s, KVM_CAP_VM_ATTRIBUTES) == 0) { + return -ENOSYS; + } + + rc = kvm_vm_ioctl(s, KVM_HAS_DEVICE_ATTR, &dev_attr); + if (rc == 0) { + return 0; + } + return -EFAULT; +} + +static int kvm_s390_get_machine_props(KVMState *s, S390MachineProps *prop) +{ + int rc; + + rc = has_cpu_model_call(s, KVM_S390_VM_CPU_MACHINE); + if (!rc) { + rc = cpu_model_get(s, KVM_S390_VM_CPU_MACHINE, (uint64_t) prop); + } + trace_kvm_get_machine_props(rc, prop->cpuid, prop->ibc_range); + return rc; +} + +static void kvm_s390_setup_cpu_classes(KVMState *s) +{ + S390MachineProps mach; + + if (!kvm_s390_get_machine_props(s, &mach)) { + cpu_classes_initialized = false; + } +} + int kvm_arch_init(KVMState *s) { cap_sync_regs = kvm_check_extension(s, KVM_CAP_SYNC_REGS); @@ -185,6 +249,8 @@ int kvm_arch_init(KVMState *s) || !kvm_check_extension(s, KVM_CAP_S390_COW)) { phys_mem_set_alloc(legacy_s390_alloc); } + + kvm_s390_setup_cpu_classes(s); return 0; } @@ -1570,3 +1636,39 @@ int kvm_arch_fixup_msi_route(struct kvm_irq_routing_entry *route, route->u.adapter.adapter_id = pbdev->routes.adapter.adapter_id; return 0; } + +int kvm_s390_get_processor_props(S390ProcessorProps *prop) +{ + int rc; + + rc = has_cpu_model_call(kvm_state, KVM_S390_VM_CPU_PROCESSOR); + if (!rc) { + rc = cpu_model_get(kvm_state, + KVM_S390_VM_CPU_PROCESSOR, (uint64_t) prop); + } + trace_kvm_get_processor_props(rc, prop->cpuid, prop->ibc); + return rc; +} + +int kvm_s390_set_processor_props(S390ProcessorProps *prop) +{ + int rc; + + rc = has_cpu_model_call(kvm_state, KVM_S390_VM_CPU_PROCESSOR); + if (!rc) { + rc = cpu_model_set(kvm_state, + KVM_S390_VM_CPU_PROCESSOR, (uint64_t) prop); + } + trace_kvm_set_processor_props(rc); + return rc; +} + +bool kvm_s390_cpu_classes_initialized(void) +{ + return cpu_classes_initialized; +} + +bool kvm_s390_probe_mode(void) +{ + return kvm_probe_mode_enabled(); +} diff --git a/trace-events b/trace-events index f87b077..f39f879 100644 --- a/trace-events +++ b/trace-events @@ -1577,6 +1577,9 @@ mhp_pc_dimm_assigned_address(uint64_t addr) "0x%"PRIx64 kvm_enable_cmma(int rc) "CMMA: enabling with result code %d" kvm_clear_cmma(int rc) "CMMA: clearing with result code %d" kvm_failed_cpu_state_set(int cpu_index, uint8_t state, const char *msg) "Warning: Unable to set cpu %d state %" PRIu8 " to KVM: %s" +kvm_get_machine_props(int rc, uint64_t cpuid, uint16_t ibc) "CPU-MODEL: fetching machine properties rc=%d cpuid=0x%"PRIx64" ibc=0x%"PRIx16 +kvm_get_processor_props(int rc, uint64_t cpuid, uint32_t ibc_range) "CPU-MODEL: fetching processor properties rc=%d cpuid=0x%"PRIx64" ibc_range=0x%"PRIx32 +kvm_set_processor_props(int rc) "CPU-MODEL: requesting processor properties rc=%d" # hw/dma/i8257.c i8257_unregistered_dma(int nchan, int dma_pos, int dma_len) "unregistered DMA channel used nchan=%d dma_pos=%d dma_len=%d" -- 1.8.3.1
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Michael Mueller <mimu@linux.vnet.ibm.com> To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Michael Mueller <mimu@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, Gleb Natapov <gleb@kernel.org>, Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>, Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>, "Jason J. Herne" <jjherne@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, Andreas Faerber <afaerber@suse.de>, Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net> Subject: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v2 09/15] cpu-model/s390: Add KVM VM attribute interface routines Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 15:24:07 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <1424183053-4310-10-git-send-email-mimu@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <1424183053-4310-1-git-send-email-mimu@linux.vnet.ibm.com> The patch implements routines to set and retrieve processor configuration data and to retrieve machine configuration data. The machine related data is used together with the cpu model facility lists to determine the list of supported cpu models of this host. The above mentioned routines have QEMU trace point instrumentation. Signed-off-by: Michael Mueller <mimu@linux.vnet.ibm.com> --- target-s390x/cpu-models.h | 39 ++++++++++++++++++ target-s390x/kvm.c | 102 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ trace-events | 3 ++ 3 files changed, 144 insertions(+) diff --git a/target-s390x/cpu-models.h b/target-s390x/cpu-models.h index 623a7b2..76b3456 100644 --- a/target-s390x/cpu-models.h +++ b/target-s390x/cpu-models.h @@ -45,6 +45,45 @@ typedef struct S390CPUAlias { char *model; } S390CPUAlias; +typedef struct S390ProcessorProps { + uint64_t cpuid; + uint16_t ibc; + uint8_t pad[6]; + uint64_t fac_list[S390_ARCH_FAC_LIST_SIZE_UINT64]; +} S390ProcessorProps; + +typedef struct S390MachineProps { + uint64_t cpuid; + uint32_t ibc_range; + uint8_t pad[4]; + uint64_t fac_list_mask[S390_ARCH_FAC_LIST_SIZE_UINT64]; + uint64_t fac_list[S390_ARCH_FAC_LIST_SIZE_UINT64]; +} S390MachineProps; + +#ifdef CONFIG_KVM +int kvm_s390_get_processor_props(S390ProcessorProps *prop); +int kvm_s390_set_processor_props(S390ProcessorProps *prop); +bool kvm_s390_cpu_classes_initialized(void); +bool kvm_s390_probe_mode(void); +#else +static inline int kvm_s390_get_processor_props(S390ProcessorProps *prob) +{ + return -ENOSYS; +} +static inline int kvm_s390_set_processor_props(S390ProcessorProps *prob) +{ + return -ENOSYS; +} +static inline bool kvm_s390_cpu_classes_initialized(void) +{ + return false; +} +static inline bool kvm_s390_probe_mode(void) +{ + return false; +} +#endif + /* * bits 0-7 : CMOS generation * bits 8-9 : reserved diff --git a/target-s390x/kvm.c b/target-s390x/kvm.c index 6f2d5b4..c518489 100644 --- a/target-s390x/kvm.c +++ b/target-s390x/kvm.c @@ -42,6 +42,7 @@ #include "qapi-event.h" #include "hw/s390x/s390-pci-inst.h" #include "hw/s390x/s390-pci-bus.h" +#include "cpu-models.h" /* #define DEBUG_KVM */ @@ -117,6 +118,7 @@ const KVMCapabilityInfo kvm_arch_required_capabilities[] = { static int cap_sync_regs; static int cap_async_pf; +static bool cpu_classes_initialized; static void *legacy_s390_alloc(size_t size, uint64_t *align); @@ -172,6 +174,68 @@ static void kvm_s390_enable_cmma(KVMState *s) trace_kvm_enable_cmma(rc); } +static int cpu_model_get(KVMState *s, uint64_t attr, uint64_t addr) +{ + struct kvm_device_attr dev_attr = { + .group = KVM_S390_VM_CPU_MODEL, + .attr = attr, + .addr = addr, + }; + + return kvm_vm_ioctl(s, KVM_GET_DEVICE_ATTR, &dev_attr); +} + +static int cpu_model_set(KVMState *s, uint64_t attr, uint64_t addr) +{ + struct kvm_device_attr dev_attr = { + .group = KVM_S390_VM_CPU_MODEL, + .attr = attr, + .addr = addr, + }; + + return kvm_vm_ioctl(s, KVM_SET_DEVICE_ATTR, &dev_attr); +} + +static int has_cpu_model_call(KVMState *s, uint64_t attr) +{ + int rc; + struct kvm_device_attr dev_attr = { + .group = KVM_S390_VM_CPU_MODEL, + .attr = attr, + }; + + if (kvm_check_extension(s, KVM_CAP_VM_ATTRIBUTES) == 0) { + return -ENOSYS; + } + + rc = kvm_vm_ioctl(s, KVM_HAS_DEVICE_ATTR, &dev_attr); + if (rc == 0) { + return 0; + } + return -EFAULT; +} + +static int kvm_s390_get_machine_props(KVMState *s, S390MachineProps *prop) +{ + int rc; + + rc = has_cpu_model_call(s, KVM_S390_VM_CPU_MACHINE); + if (!rc) { + rc = cpu_model_get(s, KVM_S390_VM_CPU_MACHINE, (uint64_t) prop); + } + trace_kvm_get_machine_props(rc, prop->cpuid, prop->ibc_range); + return rc; +} + +static void kvm_s390_setup_cpu_classes(KVMState *s) +{ + S390MachineProps mach; + + if (!kvm_s390_get_machine_props(s, &mach)) { + cpu_classes_initialized = false; + } +} + int kvm_arch_init(KVMState *s) { cap_sync_regs = kvm_check_extension(s, KVM_CAP_SYNC_REGS); @@ -185,6 +249,8 @@ int kvm_arch_init(KVMState *s) || !kvm_check_extension(s, KVM_CAP_S390_COW)) { phys_mem_set_alloc(legacy_s390_alloc); } + + kvm_s390_setup_cpu_classes(s); return 0; } @@ -1570,3 +1636,39 @@ int kvm_arch_fixup_msi_route(struct kvm_irq_routing_entry *route, route->u.adapter.adapter_id = pbdev->routes.adapter.adapter_id; return 0; } + +int kvm_s390_get_processor_props(S390ProcessorProps *prop) +{ + int rc; + + rc = has_cpu_model_call(kvm_state, KVM_S390_VM_CPU_PROCESSOR); + if (!rc) { + rc = cpu_model_get(kvm_state, + KVM_S390_VM_CPU_PROCESSOR, (uint64_t) prop); + } + trace_kvm_get_processor_props(rc, prop->cpuid, prop->ibc); + return rc; +} + +int kvm_s390_set_processor_props(S390ProcessorProps *prop) +{ + int rc; + + rc = has_cpu_model_call(kvm_state, KVM_S390_VM_CPU_PROCESSOR); + if (!rc) { + rc = cpu_model_set(kvm_state, + KVM_S390_VM_CPU_PROCESSOR, (uint64_t) prop); + } + trace_kvm_set_processor_props(rc); + return rc; +} + +bool kvm_s390_cpu_classes_initialized(void) +{ + return cpu_classes_initialized; +} + +bool kvm_s390_probe_mode(void) +{ + return kvm_probe_mode_enabled(); +} diff --git a/trace-events b/trace-events index f87b077..f39f879 100644 --- a/trace-events +++ b/trace-events @@ -1577,6 +1577,9 @@ mhp_pc_dimm_assigned_address(uint64_t addr) "0x%"PRIx64 kvm_enable_cmma(int rc) "CMMA: enabling with result code %d" kvm_clear_cmma(int rc) "CMMA: clearing with result code %d" kvm_failed_cpu_state_set(int cpu_index, uint8_t state, const char *msg) "Warning: Unable to set cpu %d state %" PRIu8 " to KVM: %s" +kvm_get_machine_props(int rc, uint64_t cpuid, uint16_t ibc) "CPU-MODEL: fetching machine properties rc=%d cpuid=0x%"PRIx64" ibc=0x%"PRIx16 +kvm_get_processor_props(int rc, uint64_t cpuid, uint32_t ibc_range) "CPU-MODEL: fetching processor properties rc=%d cpuid=0x%"PRIx64" ibc_range=0x%"PRIx32 +kvm_set_processor_props(int rc) "CPU-MODEL: requesting processor properties rc=%d" # hw/dma/i8257.c i8257_unregistered_dma(int nchan, int dma_pos, int dma_len) "unregistered DMA channel used nchan=%d dma_pos=%d dma_len=%d" -- 1.8.3.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-02-17 14:25 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 120+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2015-02-17 14:23 [RFC PATCH v2 00/15] QEMU: s390: cpu model implementation Michael Mueller 2015-02-17 14:23 ` [Qemu-devel] " Michael Mueller 2015-02-17 14:23 ` [RFC PATCH v2 01/15] cpu-model: Introduce probe mode for machine none Michael Mueller 2015-02-17 14:23 ` [Qemu-devel] " Michael Mueller 2015-02-17 14:24 ` [RFC PATCH v2 02/15] cpu-model: Introduce option --probe to switch into probe mode Michael Mueller 2015-02-17 14:24 ` [Qemu-devel] " Michael Mueller 2015-02-17 14:24 ` Michael Mueller 2015-02-17 19:16 ` [Qemu-devel] " Eric Blake 2015-02-17 19:16 ` Eric Blake 2015-02-18 9:08 ` [Qemu-devel] " Michael Mueller 2015-02-18 9:08 ` Michael Mueller 2015-02-18 9:08 ` Michael Mueller 2015-02-17 14:24 ` [RFC PATCH v2 03/15] cpu-model: Introduce stub routine cpu_desc_avail Michael Mueller 2015-02-17 14:24 ` [Qemu-devel] " Michael Mueller 2015-02-17 14:24 ` Michael Mueller 2015-02-17 14:24 ` [RFC PATCH v2 04/15] cpu-model/s390: Introduce S390 CPU models Michael Mueller 2015-02-17 14:24 ` [Qemu-devel] " Michael Mueller 2015-02-17 14:24 ` Michael Mueller 2015-02-20 13:54 ` Alexander Graf 2015-02-20 13:54 ` [Qemu-devel] " Alexander Graf 2015-02-20 15:00 ` Michael Mueller 2015-02-20 15:00 ` Michael Mueller 2015-02-20 15:22 ` Alexander Graf 2015-02-20 15:22 ` Alexander Graf 2015-02-20 15:49 ` Michael Mueller 2015-02-20 15:49 ` Michael Mueller 2015-02-20 16:57 ` Alexander Graf 2015-02-20 16:57 ` Alexander Graf 2015-02-20 17:37 ` Michael Mueller 2015-02-20 17:37 ` Michael Mueller 2015-02-20 17:50 ` Alexander Graf 2015-02-20 17:50 ` Alexander Graf 2015-02-20 19:43 ` Michael Mueller 2015-02-20 19:43 ` Michael Mueller 2015-02-20 19:55 ` Alexander Graf 2015-02-20 19:55 ` Alexander Graf 2015-02-23 12:56 ` Christian Borntraeger 2015-02-23 12:56 ` Christian Borntraeger 2015-02-23 13:27 ` Christian Borntraeger 2015-02-23 13:27 ` Christian Borntraeger 2015-02-20 13:55 ` Alexander Graf 2015-02-20 13:55 ` [Qemu-devel] " Alexander Graf 2015-02-20 15:02 ` Michael Mueller 2015-02-20 15:02 ` Michael Mueller 2015-02-17 14:24 ` [RFC PATCH v2 05/15] cpu-model/s390: Introduce S390 CPU facilities Michael Mueller 2015-02-17 14:24 ` [Qemu-devel] " Michael Mueller 2015-02-17 14:24 ` [RFC PATCH v2 06/15] cpu-model/s390: Define cpu model specific facility lists Michael Mueller 2015-02-17 14:24 ` [Qemu-devel] " Michael Mueller 2015-02-17 14:24 ` [RFC PATCH v2 07/15] cpu-model/s390: Add cpu model alias definition routines Michael Mueller 2015-02-17 14:24 ` [Qemu-devel] " Michael Mueller 2015-02-17 14:24 ` [RFC PATCH v2 08/15] cpu-model/s390: Update linux-headers/asm-s390/kvm.h Michael Mueller 2015-02-17 14:24 ` [Qemu-devel] " Michael Mueller 2015-02-17 14:24 ` Michael Mueller [this message] 2015-02-17 14:24 ` [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v2 09/15] cpu-model/s390: Add KVM VM attribute interface routines Michael Mueller 2015-02-20 13:59 ` Alexander Graf 2015-02-20 13:59 ` [Qemu-devel] " Alexander Graf 2015-02-20 15:18 ` Michael Mueller 2015-02-20 15:18 ` Michael Mueller 2015-02-20 16:59 ` Alexander Graf 2015-02-20 16:59 ` Alexander Graf 2015-02-20 18:42 ` Michael Mueller 2015-02-20 18:42 ` Michael Mueller 2015-02-17 14:24 ` [RFC PATCH v2 10/15] cpu-model/s390: Add cpu class initialization routines Michael Mueller 2015-02-17 14:24 ` [Qemu-devel] " Michael Mueller 2015-02-17 14:24 ` Michael Mueller 2015-02-20 16:02 ` Richard Henderson 2015-02-20 16:02 ` [Qemu-devel] " Richard Henderson 2015-02-20 16:12 ` Michael Mueller 2015-02-20 16:12 ` Michael Mueller 2015-02-20 16:12 ` Michael Mueller 2015-02-20 16:27 ` [Qemu-devel] " Michael Mueller 2015-02-20 16:27 ` Michael Mueller 2015-02-20 16:34 ` Andreas Färber 2015-02-20 16:34 ` Andreas Färber 2015-02-20 16:55 ` Michael Mueller 2015-02-20 18:11 ` Richard Henderson 2015-02-20 18:11 ` [Qemu-devel] " Richard Henderson 2015-02-20 18:59 ` Michael Mueller 2015-02-20 18:59 ` Michael Mueller 2015-02-20 19:21 ` Alexander Graf 2015-02-20 19:21 ` Alexander Graf 2015-02-20 19:35 ` Michael Mueller 2015-02-20 19:35 ` Michael Mueller 2015-02-17 14:24 ` [RFC PATCH v2 11/15] cpu-model/s390: Add QMP command query-cpu-model Michael Mueller 2015-02-17 14:24 ` [Qemu-devel] " Michael Mueller 2015-02-17 14:24 ` Michael Mueller 2015-02-17 18:03 ` [Qemu-devel] " Eric Blake 2015-02-18 8:39 ` Michael Mueller 2015-02-18 8:39 ` Michael Mueller 2015-02-18 8:39 ` Michael Mueller 2015-02-17 14:24 ` [RFC PATCH v2 12/15] cpu-model/s390: Extend QMP command query-cpu-definitions Michael Mueller 2015-02-17 14:24 ` [Qemu-devel] " Michael Mueller 2015-02-17 18:09 ` Eric Blake 2015-02-18 9:29 ` Michael Mueller 2015-02-18 9:29 ` Michael Mueller 2015-02-18 9:29 ` Michael Mueller 2015-02-17 14:24 ` [RFC PATCH v2 13/15] cpu-model/s390: Add processor property routines Michael Mueller 2015-02-17 14:24 ` [Qemu-devel] " Michael Mueller 2015-02-20 14:03 ` Alexander Graf 2015-02-20 14:03 ` [Qemu-devel] " Alexander Graf 2015-02-20 15:32 ` Michael Mueller 2015-02-20 15:32 ` Michael Mueller 2015-02-20 15:41 ` Andreas Färber 2015-02-20 15:41 ` Andreas Färber 2015-02-20 16:04 ` Michael Mueller 2015-02-20 16:04 ` Michael Mueller 2015-02-20 16:28 ` Andreas Färber 2015-02-20 16:28 ` Andreas Färber 2015-02-20 16:53 ` Michael Mueller 2015-02-20 16:53 ` Michael Mueller 2015-02-20 16:05 ` Michael Mueller 2015-02-20 16:05 ` Michael Mueller 2015-02-20 17:00 ` Alexander Graf 2015-02-20 17:00 ` Alexander Graf 2015-02-20 19:29 ` Michael Mueller 2015-02-20 19:29 ` Michael Mueller 2015-02-17 14:24 ` [RFC PATCH v2 14/15] cpu-model/s390: Add cpu model selection routine Michael Mueller 2015-02-17 14:24 ` [Qemu-devel] " Michael Mueller 2015-02-17 14:24 ` [RFC PATCH v2 15/15] cpu-model/s390: Enable S390 cpu model Michael Mueller 2015-02-17 14:24 ` [Qemu-devel] " Michael Mueller
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=1424183053-4310-10-git-send-email-mimu@linux.vnet.ibm.com \ --to=mimu@linux.vnet.ibm.com \ --cc=afaerber@suse.de \ --cc=agraf@suse.de \ --cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \ --cc=cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com \ --cc=gleb@kernel.org \ --cc=jjherne@linux.vnet.ibm.com \ --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \ --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \ --cc=rth@twiddle.net \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.