From: Huang Ying <ying.huang@linux.intel.com>
To: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, LKP ML <lkp@01.org>
Subject: Re: [LKP] [mm] 3484b2de949: -46.2% aim7.jobs-per-min
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2015 10:30:22 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1425090622.10337.67.camel@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150228014642.GG3087@suse.de>
On Sat, 2015-02-28 at 01:46 +0000, Mel Gorman wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 03:21:36PM +0800, Huang Ying wrote:
> > FYI, we noticed the below changes on
> >
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master
> > commit 3484b2de9499df23c4604a513b36f96326ae81ad ("mm: rearrange zone fields into read-only, page alloc, statistics and page reclaim lines")
> >
> > The perf cpu-cycles for spinlock (zone->lock) increased a lot. I suspect there are some cache ping-pong or false sharing.
> >
>
> Are you sure about this result? I ran similar tests here and found that
> there was a major regression introduced near there but it was commit
> 05b843012335 ("mm: memcontrol: use root_mem_cgroup res_counter") that
> cause the problem and it was later reverted. On local tests on a 4-node
> machine, commit 3484b2de9499df23c4604a513b36f96326ae81ad was within 1%
> of the previous commit and well within the noise.
I have double checked the result before sending out.
Do you do the test with same kernel config and test case/parameters
(aim7/page_test/load 6000)?
Best Regards,
Huang, Ying
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Huang Ying <ying.huang@linux.intel.com>
To: lkp@lists.01.org
Subject: Re: [mm] 3484b2de949: -46.2% aim7.jobs-per-min
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2015 10:30:22 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1425090622.10337.67.camel@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150228014642.GG3087@suse.de>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1144 bytes --]
On Sat, 2015-02-28 at 01:46 +0000, Mel Gorman wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 03:21:36PM +0800, Huang Ying wrote:
> > FYI, we noticed the below changes on
> >
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master
> > commit 3484b2de9499df23c4604a513b36f96326ae81ad ("mm: rearrange zone fields into read-only, page alloc, statistics and page reclaim lines")
> >
> > The perf cpu-cycles for spinlock (zone->lock) increased a lot. I suspect there are some cache ping-pong or false sharing.
> >
>
> Are you sure about this result? I ran similar tests here and found that
> there was a major regression introduced near there but it was commit
> 05b843012335 ("mm: memcontrol: use root_mem_cgroup res_counter") that
> cause the problem and it was later reverted. On local tests on a 4-node
> machine, commit 3484b2de9499df23c4604a513b36f96326ae81ad was within 1%
> of the previous commit and well within the noise.
I have double checked the result before sending out.
Do you do the test with same kernel config and test case/parameters
(aim7/page_test/load 6000)?
Best Regards,
Huang, Ying
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-02-28 2:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-02-27 7:21 [LKP] [mm] 3484b2de949: -46.2% aim7.jobs-per-min Huang Ying
2015-02-27 7:21 ` Huang Ying
2015-02-27 11:53 ` [LKP] " Mel Gorman
2015-02-27 11:53 ` Mel Gorman
2015-02-28 1:24 ` [LKP] " Huang Ying
2015-02-28 1:24 ` Huang Ying
2015-02-28 7:57 ` [LKP] " Huang Ying
2015-02-28 7:57 ` Huang Ying
2015-02-28 1:46 ` [LKP] " Mel Gorman
2015-02-28 1:46 ` Mel Gorman
2015-02-28 2:30 ` Huang Ying [this message]
2015-02-28 2:30 ` Huang Ying
2015-02-28 2:42 ` [LKP] " Huang Ying
2015-02-28 2:42 ` Huang Ying
2015-02-28 7:30 ` [LKP] " Huang Ying
2015-02-28 7:30 ` Huang Ying
2015-03-05 5:34 ` [LKP] " Huang Ying
2015-03-05 5:34 ` Huang Ying
2015-03-05 10:26 ` [LKP] " Mel Gorman
2015-03-05 10:26 ` Mel Gorman
2015-03-23 8:46 ` [LKP] " Huang Ying
2015-03-23 8:46 ` Huang Ying
2015-03-25 10:54 ` [LKP] " Mel Gorman
2015-03-25 10:54 ` Mel Gorman
2015-03-27 8:49 ` [LKP] " Huang Ying
2015-03-27 8:49 ` Huang Ying
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1425090622.10337.67.camel@linux.intel.com \
--to=ying.huang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkp@01.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.