[PATCH 10/11] x86: perf_event_intel_bts.c: use arch_initcall to hook in enabling

[Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>]

This was using module_init, but there is no way this code can
be modular.  In the non-modular case, a module_init becomes a
device_initcall, but this really isn't a device.   So we should
choose a more appropriate initcall bucket to put it in.

The obvious choice here seems to be arch_initcall, but that does
make it earlier than it was currently through device_initcall.
As long as perf_pmu_register() is functional, we should be OK.

Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: x86@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_bts.c | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_bts.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_bts.c
index ac1f0c55f379..7b2fec86dead 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_bts.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_bts.c
@@ -521,5 +521,4 @@ static __init int bts_init(void)
 
 	return perf_pmu_register(&bts_pmu, "intel_bts", -1);
 }
-
-module_init(bts_init);
+arch_initcall(bts_init);
-- 
2.2.1