All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Patch "pwm: img: Impose upper and lower timebase steps value" has been added to the 4.0-stable tree
@ 2015-06-03  6:35 gregkh
  0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: gregkh @ 2015-06-03  6:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: naidu.tellapati, ezequiel.garcia, gregkh, thierry.reding
  Cc: stable, stable-commits


This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    pwm: img: Impose upper and lower timebase steps value

to the 4.0-stable tree which can be found at:
    http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     pwm-img-impose-upper-and-lower-timebase-steps-value.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.0 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.


>From 1e70897d0e20f988abedcf73b33684ecd2be9511 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Naidu Tellapati <naidu.tellapati@imgtec.com>
Date: Fri, 8 May 2015 18:47:31 -0300
Subject: pwm: img: Impose upper and lower timebase steps value

From: Naidu Tellapati <naidu.tellapati@imgtec.com>

commit 1e70897d0e20f988abedcf73b33684ecd2be9511 upstream.

The PWM hardware on Pistachio platform has a maximum timebase steps
value to 255. To fix it, let's introduce a compatible-specific
data structure to contain the SoC-specific details and use it to
specify a maximum timebase.

Also, let's limit the minimum timebase to 16 steps, to allow a sane
range of duty cycle steps.

Fixes: 277bb6a29e00 ("pwm: Imagination Technologies PWM DAC driver")
Signed-off-by: Naidu Tellapati <naidu.tellapati@imgtec.com>
Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel.garcia@imgtec.com>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/pwm/pwm-img.c |   76 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 64 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-img.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-img.c
@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
 #include <linux/mfd/syscon.h>
 #include <linux/module.h>
 #include <linux/of.h>
+#include <linux/of_device.h>
 #include <linux/platform_device.h>
 #include <linux/pwm.h>
 #include <linux/regmap.h>
@@ -38,7 +39,22 @@
 #define PERIP_PWM_PDM_CONTROL_CH_MASK		0x1
 #define PERIP_PWM_PDM_CONTROL_CH_SHIFT(ch)	((ch) * 4)
 
-#define MAX_TMBASE_STEPS			65536
+/*
+ * PWM period is specified with a timebase register,
+ * in number of step periods. The PWM duty cycle is also
+ * specified in step periods, in the [0, $timebase] range.
+ * In other words, the timebase imposes the duty cycle
+ * resolution. Therefore, let's constraint the timebase to
+ * a minimum value to allow a sane range of duty cycle values.
+ * Imposing a minimum timebase, will impose a maximum PWM frequency.
+ *
+ * The value chosen is completely arbitrary.
+ */
+#define MIN_TMBASE_STEPS			16
+
+struct img_pwm_soc_data {
+	u32 max_timebase;
+};
 
 struct img_pwm_chip {
 	struct device	*dev;
@@ -47,6 +63,9 @@ struct img_pwm_chip {
 	struct clk	*sys_clk;
 	void __iomem	*base;
 	struct regmap	*periph_regs;
+	int		max_period_ns;
+	int		min_period_ns;
+	const struct img_pwm_soc_data   *data;
 };
 
 static inline struct img_pwm_chip *to_img_pwm_chip(struct pwm_chip *chip)
@@ -72,24 +91,31 @@ static int img_pwm_config(struct pwm_chi
 	u32 val, div, duty, timebase;
 	unsigned long mul, output_clk_hz, input_clk_hz;
 	struct img_pwm_chip *pwm_chip = to_img_pwm_chip(chip);
+	unsigned int max_timebase = pwm_chip->data->max_timebase;
+
+	if (period_ns < pwm_chip->min_period_ns ||
+	    period_ns > pwm_chip->max_period_ns) {
+		dev_err(chip->dev, "configured period not in range\n");
+		return -ERANGE;
+	}
 
 	input_clk_hz = clk_get_rate(pwm_chip->pwm_clk);
 	output_clk_hz = DIV_ROUND_UP(NSEC_PER_SEC, period_ns);
 
 	mul = DIV_ROUND_UP(input_clk_hz, output_clk_hz);
-	if (mul <= MAX_TMBASE_STEPS) {
+	if (mul <= max_timebase) {
 		div = PWM_CTRL_CFG_NO_SUB_DIV;
 		timebase = DIV_ROUND_UP(mul, 1);
-	} else if (mul <= MAX_TMBASE_STEPS * 8) {
+	} else if (mul <= max_timebase * 8) {
 		div = PWM_CTRL_CFG_SUB_DIV0;
 		timebase = DIV_ROUND_UP(mul, 8);
-	} else if (mul <= MAX_TMBASE_STEPS * 64) {
+	} else if (mul <= max_timebase * 64) {
 		div = PWM_CTRL_CFG_SUB_DIV1;
 		timebase = DIV_ROUND_UP(mul, 64);
-	} else if (mul <= MAX_TMBASE_STEPS * 512) {
+	} else if (mul <= max_timebase * 512) {
 		div = PWM_CTRL_CFG_SUB_DIV0_DIV1;
 		timebase = DIV_ROUND_UP(mul, 512);
-	} else if (mul > MAX_TMBASE_STEPS * 512) {
+	} else if (mul > max_timebase * 512) {
 		dev_err(chip->dev,
 			"failed to configure timebase steps/divider value\n");
 		return -EINVAL;
@@ -143,11 +169,27 @@ static const struct pwm_ops img_pwm_ops
 	.owner = THIS_MODULE,
 };
 
+static const struct img_pwm_soc_data pistachio_pwm = {
+	.max_timebase = 255,
+};
+
+static const struct of_device_id img_pwm_of_match[] = {
+	{
+		.compatible = "img,pistachio-pwm",
+		.data = &pistachio_pwm,
+	},
+	{ }
+};
+MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, img_pwm_of_match);
+
 static int img_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 {
 	int ret;
+	u64 val;
+	unsigned long clk_rate;
 	struct resource *res;
 	struct img_pwm_chip *pwm;
+	const struct of_device_id *of_dev_id;
 
 	pwm = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*pwm), GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!pwm)
@@ -160,6 +202,11 @@ static int img_pwm_probe(struct platform
 	if (IS_ERR(pwm->base))
 		return PTR_ERR(pwm->base);
 
+	of_dev_id = of_match_device(img_pwm_of_match, &pdev->dev);
+	if (!of_dev_id)
+		return -ENODEV;
+	pwm->data = of_dev_id->data;
+
 	pwm->periph_regs = syscon_regmap_lookup_by_phandle(pdev->dev.of_node,
 							   "img,cr-periph");
 	if (IS_ERR(pwm->periph_regs))
@@ -189,6 +236,17 @@ static int img_pwm_probe(struct platform
 		goto disable_sysclk;
 	}
 
+	clk_rate = clk_get_rate(pwm->pwm_clk);
+
+	/* The maximum input clock divider is 512 */
+	val = (u64)NSEC_PER_SEC * 512 * pwm->data->max_timebase;
+	do_div(val, clk_rate);
+	pwm->max_period_ns = val;
+
+	val = (u64)NSEC_PER_SEC * MIN_TMBASE_STEPS;
+	do_div(val, clk_rate);
+	pwm->min_period_ns = val;
+
 	pwm->chip.dev = &pdev->dev;
 	pwm->chip.ops = &img_pwm_ops;
 	pwm->chip.base = -1;
@@ -228,12 +286,6 @@ static int img_pwm_remove(struct platfor
 	return pwmchip_remove(&pwm_chip->chip);
 }
 
-static const struct of_device_id img_pwm_of_match[] = {
-	{ .compatible = "img,pistachio-pwm", },
-	{ }
-};
-MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, img_pwm_of_match);
-
 static struct platform_driver img_pwm_driver = {
 	.driver = {
 		.name = "img-pwm",


Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from naidu.tellapati@imgtec.com are

queue-4.0/pwm-img-impose-upper-and-lower-timebase-steps-value.patch
queue-4.0/iio-adc-cc10001-fix-the-channel-number-mapping.patch
queue-4.0/iio-adc-cc10001-fix-regulator_get_voltage-return-value-check.patch
queue-4.0/iio-adc-cc10001-add-delay-before-setting-start-bit.patch
queue-4.0/iio-adc-cc10001-fix-incorrect-use-of-power-up-power-down-register.patch

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] only message in thread

only message in thread, other threads:[~2015-06-03  6:35 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-06-03  6:35 Patch "pwm: img: Impose upper and lower timebase steps value" has been added to the 4.0-stable tree gregkh

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.