All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
To: Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>,
	Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no>
Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Sagi Grimberg <sagig@mellanox.com>,
	Anna Schumaker <anna.schumaker@netapp.com>,
	Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>,
	Devesh Sharma <devesh.sharma@avagotech.com>,
	Devesh Sharma <devesh.sharma@avagotech.com>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the rdma tree with the nfs tree
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2015 13:17:18 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1434511038.24642.2.camel@ellerman.id.au> (raw)

Hi Doug,

Today's linux-next merge of the rdma tree got a conflict in:

  net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/frwr_ops.c

between commit:

  951e721ca0d6 "xprtrdma: Introduce an FRMR recovery workqueue"

from the nfs tree and commit:

  76357c715f32 "xprtrdma, svcrdma: Switch to generic logging helpers"

from the rdma tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action
is required).

cheers

diff --cc net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/frwr_ops.c
index 661fbc1784ab,d234521320a4..000000000000
--- a/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/frwr_ops.c
+++ b/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/frwr_ops.c
@@@ -252,8 -128,8 +252,8 @@@ frwr_sendcompletion(struct ib_wc *wc
  
  	/* WARNING: Only wr_id and status are reliable at this point */
  	r = (struct rpcrdma_mw *)(unsigned long)wc->wr_id;
- 	pr_warn("RPC:       %s: frmr %p flushed, status %d\n",
- 		__func__, r, wc->status);
 -	dprintk("RPC:       %s: frmr %p (stale), status %s (%d)\n",
++	pr_warn("RPC:       %s: frmr %p flushed, status %s (%d)\n",
+ 		__func__, r, ib_wc_status_msg(wc->status), wc->status);
  	r->r.frmr.fr_state = FRMR_IS_STALE;
  }
  






WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
To: Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>,
	Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no>
Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Sagi Grimberg <sagig@mellanox.com>,
	Anna Schumaker <anna.schumaker@netapp.com>,
	Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>,
	Devesh Sharma <devesh.sharma@avagotech.com>Devesh Sharma
	<devesh.sharma@avagotech.com>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the rdma tree with the nfs tree
Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2015 13:17:18 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1434511038.24642.2.camel@ellerman.id.au> (raw)

Hi Doug,

Today's linux-next merge of the rdma tree got a conflict in:

  net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/frwr_ops.c

between commit:

  951e721ca0d6 "xprtrdma: Introduce an FRMR recovery workqueue"

from the nfs tree and commit:

  76357c715f32 "xprtrdma, svcrdma: Switch to generic logging helpers"

from the rdma tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action
is required).

cheers

diff --cc net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/frwr_ops.c
index 661fbc1784ab,d234521320a4..000000000000
--- a/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/frwr_ops.c
+++ b/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/frwr_ops.c
@@@ -252,8 -128,8 +252,8 @@@ frwr_sendcompletion(struct ib_wc *wc
  
  	/* WARNING: Only wr_id and status are reliable at this point */
  	r = (struct rpcrdma_mw *)(unsigned long)wc->wr_id;
- 	pr_warn("RPC:       %s: frmr %p flushed, status %d\n",
- 		__func__, r, wc->status);
 -	dprintk("RPC:       %s: frmr %p (stale), status %s (%d)\n",
++	pr_warn("RPC:       %s: frmr %p flushed, status %s (%d)\n",
+ 		__func__, r, ib_wc_status_msg(wc->status), wc->status);
  	r->r.frmr.fr_state = FRMR_IS_STALE;
  }
  

             reply	other threads:[~2015-06-17  3:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-06-17  3:17 Michael Ellerman [this message]
2015-06-17  3:17 ` linux-next: manual merge of the rdma tree with the nfs tree Michael Ellerman
2015-06-17  3:19 Michael Ellerman
2016-05-19  1:53 Stephen Rothwell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1434511038.24642.2.camel@ellerman.id.au \
    --to=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=anna.schumaker@netapp.com \
    --cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
    --cc=devesh.sharma@avagotech.com \
    --cc=dledford@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sagig@mellanox.com \
    --cc=trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.