All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
	"Goel, Akash" <akash.goel@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH] drm/i915: Only move to the CPU write domain if keeping the GTT pages
Date: Thu,  6 Aug 2015 17:43:39 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1438879419-15555-1-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> (raw)

We have for a long time been ultra-paranoid about the situation whereby
we hand back pages to the system that have been written to by the GPU
and potentially simultaneously by the user through a CPU mmapping. We
can relax this restriction when we know that the cache domain tracking
is true and there can be no stale cacheline invalidatations. This is
true if the object has never been CPU mmaped as all internal accesses
(i.e. kmap/iomap) are carefully flushed. For a CPU mmaping, one would
expect that the invalid cache lines are resolved on PTE/TLB shootdown
during munmap(), so the only situation we need to be paranoid about is
when such a CPU mmaping exists at the time of put_pages. Given that we
need to treat put_pages carefully as we may return live data to the
system that we want to use again in the future (i.e. I915_MADV_WILLNEED
pages) we can simply treat a live CPU mmaping as a special case of
WILLNEED (which it is!). Any I915_MADV_DONTNEED pages and their
mmapings are shotdown immediately following put_pages.

Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: "Goel, Akash" <akash.goel@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 49 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
index 2dfe707f11d3..24deace364a5 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
@@ -2047,22 +2047,45 @@ i915_gem_object_put_pages_gtt(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
 
 	BUG_ON(obj->madv == __I915_MADV_PURGED);
 
-	ret = i915_gem_object_set_to_cpu_domain(obj, true);
-	if (ret) {
-		/* In the event of a disaster, abandon all caches and
-		 * hope for the best.
-		 */
-		WARN_ON(ret != -EIO);
-		i915_gem_clflush_object(obj, true);
-		obj->base.read_domains = obj->base.write_domain = I915_GEM_DOMAIN_CPU;
-	}
-
 	i915_gem_gtt_finish_object(obj);
 
-	if (i915_gem_object_needs_bit17_swizzle(obj))
-		i915_gem_object_save_bit_17_swizzle(obj);
+	/* If we need to access the data in the future, we need to
+	 * be sure that the contents of the object is coherent with
+	 * the CPU prior to releasing the pages back to the system.
+	 * Once we unpin them, the mm is free to move them to different
+	 * zones or even swap them out to disk - all without our
+	 * intervention. (Though we could track such operations with our
+	 * own gemfs, if we ever write one.) As such if we want to keep
+	 * the data, set it to the CPU domain now just in case someone
+	 * else touches it.
+	 *
+	 * For a long time we have been paranoid about handing back
+	 * pages to the system with stale cacheline invalidation. For
+	 * all internal use (kmap/iomap), we know that the domain tracking is
+	 * accurate. However, the userspace API is lax and the user can CPU
+	 * mmap the object and invalidate cachelines without our accurate
+	 * tracking. We have been paranoid to be sure that we always flushed
+	 * the cachelines when we stopped using the pages. However, given
+	 * that the CPU PTE/TLB shootdown must have invalidated the cachelines
+	 * upon munmap(), we only need to be paranoid about a live CPU mmap
+	 * now. For this, we need only treat it as live data see
+	 * discard_backing_storage().
+	 */
+	if (obj->madv == I915_MADV_WILLNEED) {
+		ret = i915_gem_object_set_to_cpu_domain(obj, true);
+		if (ret) {
+			/* In the event of a disaster, abandon all caches and
+			 * hope for the best.
+			 */
+			WARN_ON(ret != -EIO);
+			i915_gem_clflush_object(obj, true);
+			obj->base.read_domains = I915_GEM_DOMAIN_CPU;
+			obj->base.write_domain = I915_GEM_DOMAIN_CPU;
+		}
 
-	if (obj->madv == I915_MADV_DONTNEED)
+		if (i915_gem_object_needs_bit17_swizzle(obj))
+			i915_gem_object_save_bit_17_swizzle(obj);
+	} else
 		obj->dirty = 0;
 
 	st_for_each_page(&iter, obj->pages) {
-- 
2.5.0

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

             reply	other threads:[~2015-08-06 16:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-08-06 16:43 Chris Wilson [this message]
2015-08-07  8:07 ` [PATCH] drm/i915: Only move to the CPU write domain if keeping the GTT pages Daniel Vetter
2015-08-07 10:10   ` Chris Wilson
2015-08-07 11:55     ` Daniel Vetter
2015-08-07 13:07       ` Chris Wilson
2015-08-12 12:35         ` Daniel Vetter
2015-08-12 12:45           ` Chris Wilson
2015-08-09 10:53   ` Goel, Akash
2015-08-09 10:55     ` Chris Wilson
2015-08-09 11:41       ` Goel, Akash
2015-08-09 12:49         ` Chris Wilson
2015-08-09 13:32           ` Goel, Akash
2015-08-19 14:24             ` akash goel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1438879419-15555-1-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
    --to=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
    --cc=akash.goel@intel.com \
    --cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.