All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH v6] ubifs: introduce UBIFS_ATIME_SUPPORT to ubifs
@ 2015-08-21  3:10 Dongsheng Yang
  2015-10-03 18:34 ` Richard Weinberger
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Dongsheng Yang @ 2015-08-21  3:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: dedekind1, richard.weinberger; +Cc: linux-mtd, linux-fsdevel, Dongsheng Yang

To make ubifs support atime flexily, this commit introduces
a Kconfig option named as UBIFS_ATIME_SUPPORT.

With UBIFS_ATIME_SUPPORT=n:
	ubifs keeps the full compatibility to no_atime from
the start of ubifs.
=================UBIFS_ATIME_SUPPORT=n=======================
-o - no atime
-o atime - no atime
-o noatime - no atime
-o relatime - no atime
-o strictatime - no atime
-o lazyatime - no atime

With UBIFS_ATIME_SUPPORT=y:
	ubifs supports the atime same with other main stream
file systems.
=================UBIFS_ATIME_SUPPORT=y=======================
-o - default behavior (relatime currently)
-o atime - atime support
-o noatime - no atime support
-o relatime - relative atime support
-o strictatime - strict atime support
-o lazyatime - lazy atime support

Signed-off-by: Dongsheng Yang <yangds.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
---
	-v2:
		implement update_time for ubifs
	-v3:
		Oops, forgot to assign update_time for
		ubifs_dir_inode_operations.
	-v4:
		drop the patch to change 'Y' to 'N' in
		Kconfig
	-v5:
		simplify the warning in atime supporting
	-v6:
		* replace ubifs_warn with ubifs_msg
		* rewrite the messages in Kconfig as Artem suggested
		* remove S_VERSION related code
 fs/ubifs/Kconfig | 15 +++++++++++++++
 fs/ubifs/dir.c   |  3 +++
 fs/ubifs/file.c  | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 fs/ubifs/super.c | 12 ++++++++++--
 fs/ubifs/ubifs.h |  1 +
 5 files changed, 77 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/ubifs/Kconfig b/fs/ubifs/Kconfig
index ba66d50..7ff7712 100644
--- a/fs/ubifs/Kconfig
+++ b/fs/ubifs/Kconfig
@@ -35,3 +35,18 @@ config UBIFS_FS_ZLIB
 	default y
 	help
 	  Zlib compresses better than LZO but it is slower. Say 'Y' if unsure.
+
+config UBIFS_ATIME_SUPPORT
+	bool "Access time support" if UBIFS_FS
+	depends on UBIFS_FS
+	default n
+	help
+	  Originally UBIFS did not support atime, because it looked like a bad idea due
+	  increased flash wear. This option adds atime support and it is disabled by default
+	  to preserve the old behavior. If you enable this option, UBIFS starts updating atime,
+	  which means that file-system read operations will cause writes (inode atime
+	  updates). This may affect file-system performance and increase flash device wear,
+	  so be careful. How often atime is updated depends on the selected strategy:
+	  strictatime is the "heavy", relatime is "lighter", etc.
+
+	  If unsure, say 'N'
diff --git a/fs/ubifs/dir.c b/fs/ubifs/dir.c
index 27060fc..8d93427 100644
--- a/fs/ubifs/dir.c
+++ b/fs/ubifs/dir.c
@@ -1187,6 +1187,9 @@ const struct inode_operations ubifs_dir_inode_operations = {
 	.getxattr    = ubifs_getxattr,
 	.listxattr   = ubifs_listxattr,
 	.removexattr = ubifs_removexattr,
+#ifdef CONFIG_UBIFS_ATIME_SUPPORT
+	.update_time = ubifs_update_time,
+#endif
 };
 
 const struct file_operations ubifs_dir_operations = {
diff --git a/fs/ubifs/file.c b/fs/ubifs/file.c
index 35efc10..423ce6b 100644
--- a/fs/ubifs/file.c
+++ b/fs/ubifs/file.c
@@ -1364,6 +1364,45 @@ static inline int mctime_update_needed(const struct inode *inode,
 }
 
 /**
+ * ubifs_update_time - update time of inode.
+ * @inode: inode to update
+ *
+ * This function updates time of the inode.
+ */
+int ubifs_update_time(struct inode *inode, struct timespec *time,
+			     int flags)
+{
+	struct ubifs_inode *ui = ubifs_inode(inode);
+	struct ubifs_info *c = inode->i_sb->s_fs_info;
+	struct ubifs_budget_req req = { .dirtied_ino = 1,
+			.dirtied_ino_d = ALIGN(ui->data_len, 8) };
+	int iflags = I_DIRTY_TIME;
+	int err, release;
+
+	err = ubifs_budget_space(c, &req);
+	if (err)
+		return err;
+
+	mutex_lock(&ui->ui_mutex);
+	if (flags & S_ATIME)
+		inode->i_atime = *time;
+	if (flags & S_CTIME)
+		inode->i_ctime = *time;
+	if (flags & S_MTIME)
+		inode->i_mtime = *time;
+
+	if (!(inode->i_sb->s_flags & MS_LAZYTIME))
+		iflags |= I_DIRTY_SYNC;
+
+	release = ui->dirty;
+	__mark_inode_dirty(inode, iflags);
+	mutex_unlock(&ui->ui_mutex);
+	if (release)
+		ubifs_release_budget(c, &req);
+	return 0;
+}
+
+/**
  * update_ctime - update mtime and ctime of an inode.
  * @inode: inode to update
  *
@@ -1546,6 +1585,9 @@ static int ubifs_file_mmap(struct file *file, struct vm_area_struct *vma)
 	if (err)
 		return err;
 	vma->vm_ops = &ubifs_file_vm_ops;
+#ifdef CONFIG_UBIFS_ATIME_SUPPORT
+	file_accessed(file);
+#endif
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -1566,6 +1608,9 @@ const struct inode_operations ubifs_file_inode_operations = {
 	.getxattr    = ubifs_getxattr,
 	.listxattr   = ubifs_listxattr,
 	.removexattr = ubifs_removexattr,
+#ifdef CONFIG_UBIFS_ATIME_SUPPORT
+	.update_time = ubifs_update_time,
+#endif
 };
 
 const struct inode_operations ubifs_symlink_inode_operations = {
@@ -1577,6 +1622,9 @@ const struct inode_operations ubifs_symlink_inode_operations = {
 	.getxattr    = ubifs_getxattr,
 	.listxattr   = ubifs_listxattr,
 	.removexattr = ubifs_removexattr,
+#ifdef CONFIG_UBIFS_ATIME_SUPPORT
+	.update_time = ubifs_update_time,
+#endif
 };
 
 const struct file_operations ubifs_file_operations = {
diff --git a/fs/ubifs/super.c b/fs/ubifs/super.c
index 75e6f04..e1e42ff 100644
--- a/fs/ubifs/super.c
+++ b/fs/ubifs/super.c
@@ -128,7 +128,10 @@ struct inode *ubifs_iget(struct super_block *sb, unsigned long inum)
 	if (err)
 		goto out_ino;
 
-	inode->i_flags |= (S_NOCMTIME | S_NOATIME);
+	inode->i_flags |= S_NOCMTIME;
+#ifndef CONFIG_UBIFS_ATIME_SUPPORT
+	inode->i_flags |= S_NOATIME;
+#endif
 	set_nlink(inode, le32_to_cpu(ino->nlink));
 	i_uid_write(inode, le32_to_cpu(ino->uid));
 	i_gid_write(inode, le32_to_cpu(ino->gid));
@@ -2138,7 +2141,12 @@ static struct dentry *ubifs_mount(struct file_system_type *fs_type, int flags,
 		if (err)
 			goto out_deact;
 		/* We do not support atime */
-		sb->s_flags |= MS_ACTIVE | MS_NOATIME;
+		sb->s_flags |= MS_ACTIVE;
+#ifndef CONFIG_UBIFS_ATIME_SUPPORT
+		sb->s_flags |= MS_NOATIME;
+#else
+		ubifs_msg(c, "full atime support is enabled.");
+#endif
 	}
 
 	/* 'fill_super()' opens ubi again so we must close it here */
diff --git a/fs/ubifs/ubifs.h b/fs/ubifs/ubifs.h
index de75902..216ba87 100644
--- a/fs/ubifs/ubifs.h
+++ b/fs/ubifs/ubifs.h
@@ -1746,6 +1746,7 @@ int ubifs_calc_dark(const struct ubifs_info *c, int spc);
 /* file.c */
 int ubifs_fsync(struct file *file, loff_t start, loff_t end, int datasync);
 int ubifs_setattr(struct dentry *dentry, struct iattr *attr);
+int ubifs_update_time(struct inode *inode, struct timespec *time, int flags);
 
 /* dir.c */
 struct inode *ubifs_new_inode(struct ubifs_info *c, const struct inode *dir,
-- 
1.8.4.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v6] ubifs: introduce UBIFS_ATIME_SUPPORT to ubifs
  2015-08-21  3:10 [PATCH v6] ubifs: introduce UBIFS_ATIME_SUPPORT to ubifs Dongsheng Yang
@ 2015-10-03 18:34 ` Richard Weinberger
  2015-11-06  9:25   ` Richard Weinberger
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Richard Weinberger @ 2015-10-03 18:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Dongsheng Yang, dedekind1; +Cc: linux-mtd, linux-fsdevel

Am 21.08.2015 um 05:10 schrieb Dongsheng Yang:
> To make ubifs support atime flexily, this commit introduces
> a Kconfig option named as UBIFS_ATIME_SUPPORT.
> 
> With UBIFS_ATIME_SUPPORT=n:
> 	ubifs keeps the full compatibility to no_atime from
> the start of ubifs.
> =================UBIFS_ATIME_SUPPORT=n=======================
> -o - no atime
> -o atime - no atime
> -o noatime - no atime
> -o relatime - no atime
> -o strictatime - no atime
> -o lazyatime - no atime
> 
> With UBIFS_ATIME_SUPPORT=y:
> 	ubifs supports the atime same with other main stream
> file systems.
> =================UBIFS_ATIME_SUPPORT=y=======================
> -o - default behavior (relatime currently)
> -o atime - atime support
> -o noatime - no atime support
> -o relatime - relative atime support
> -o strictatime - strict atime support
> -o lazyatime - lazy atime support
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dongsheng Yang <yangds.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
> ---
> 	-v2:
> 		implement update_time for ubifs
> 	-v3:
> 		Oops, forgot to assign update_time for
> 		ubifs_dir_inode_operations.
> 	-v4:
> 		drop the patch to change 'Y' to 'N' in
> 		Kconfig
> 	-v5:
> 		simplify the warning in atime supporting
> 	-v6:
> 		* replace ubifs_warn with ubifs_msg
> 		* rewrite the messages in Kconfig as Artem suggested
> 		* remove S_VERSION related code
>  fs/ubifs/Kconfig | 15 +++++++++++++++
>  fs/ubifs/dir.c   |  3 +++
>  fs/ubifs/file.c  | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  fs/ubifs/super.c | 12 ++++++++++--
>  fs/ubifs/ubifs.h |  1 +
>  5 files changed, 77 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/ubifs/Kconfig b/fs/ubifs/Kconfig
> index ba66d50..7ff7712 100644
> --- a/fs/ubifs/Kconfig
> +++ b/fs/ubifs/Kconfig
> @@ -35,3 +35,18 @@ config UBIFS_FS_ZLIB
>  	default y
>  	help
>  	  Zlib compresses better than LZO but it is slower. Say 'Y' if unsure.
> +
> +config UBIFS_ATIME_SUPPORT
> +	bool "Access time support" if UBIFS_FS
> +	depends on UBIFS_FS
> +	default n
> +	help
> +	  Originally UBIFS did not support atime, because it looked like a bad idea due
> +	  increased flash wear. This option adds atime support and it is disabled by default
> +	  to preserve the old behavior. If you enable this option, UBIFS starts updating atime,
> +	  which means that file-system read operations will cause writes (inode atime
> +	  updates). This may affect file-system performance and increase flash device wear,
> +	  so be careful. How often atime is updated depends on the selected strategy:
> +	  strictatime is the "heavy", relatime is "lighter", etc.
> +
> +	  If unsure, say 'N'
> diff --git a/fs/ubifs/dir.c b/fs/ubifs/dir.c
> index 27060fc..8d93427 100644
> --- a/fs/ubifs/dir.c
> +++ b/fs/ubifs/dir.c
> @@ -1187,6 +1187,9 @@ const struct inode_operations ubifs_dir_inode_operations = {
>  	.getxattr    = ubifs_getxattr,
>  	.listxattr   = ubifs_listxattr,
>  	.removexattr = ubifs_removexattr,
> +#ifdef CONFIG_UBIFS_ATIME_SUPPORT
> +	.update_time = ubifs_update_time,
> +#endif
>  };
>  
>  const struct file_operations ubifs_dir_operations = {
> diff --git a/fs/ubifs/file.c b/fs/ubifs/file.c
> index 35efc10..423ce6b 100644
> --- a/fs/ubifs/file.c
> +++ b/fs/ubifs/file.c
> @@ -1364,6 +1364,45 @@ static inline int mctime_update_needed(const struct inode *inode,
>  }
>  
>  /**
> + * ubifs_update_time - update time of inode.
> + * @inode: inode to update
> + *
> + * This function updates time of the inode.
> + */
> +int ubifs_update_time(struct inode *inode, struct timespec *time,
> +			     int flags)

This function should be under an "#ifdef CONFIG_UBIFS_ATIME_SUPPORT".

Beside of that,
Reviewed-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>

I think we can queue it for v4.4. Artem, what do you think?

Thanks,
//richard

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v6] ubifs: introduce UBIFS_ATIME_SUPPORT to ubifs
  2015-10-03 18:34 ` Richard Weinberger
@ 2015-11-06  9:25   ` Richard Weinberger
  2015-11-07  4:35     ` Dongsheng Yang
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Richard Weinberger @ 2015-11-06  9:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Dongsheng Yang, dedekind1; +Cc: linux-mtd, linux-fsdevel

Am 03.10.2015 um 20:34 schrieb Richard Weinberger:
> Am 21.08.2015 um 05:10 schrieb Dongsheng Yang:
>> To make ubifs support atime flexily, this commit introduces
>> a Kconfig option named as UBIFS_ATIME_SUPPORT.
>>
>> With UBIFS_ATIME_SUPPORT=n:
>> 	ubifs keeps the full compatibility to no_atime from
>> the start of ubifs.
>> =================UBIFS_ATIME_SUPPORT=n=======================
>> -o - no atime
>> -o atime - no atime
>> -o noatime - no atime
>> -o relatime - no atime
>> -o strictatime - no atime
>> -o lazyatime - no atime
>>
>> With UBIFS_ATIME_SUPPORT=y:
>> 	ubifs supports the atime same with other main stream
>> file systems.
>> =================UBIFS_ATIME_SUPPORT=y=======================
>> -o - default behavior (relatime currently)
>> -o atime - atime support
>> -o noatime - no atime support
>> -o relatime - relative atime support
>> -o strictatime - strict atime support
>> -o lazyatime - lazy atime support
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dongsheng Yang <yangds.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
>> ---
>> 	-v2:
>> 		implement update_time for ubifs
>> 	-v3:
>> 		Oops, forgot to assign update_time for
>> 		ubifs_dir_inode_operations.
>> 	-v4:
>> 		drop the patch to change 'Y' to 'N' in
>> 		Kconfig
>> 	-v5:
>> 		simplify the warning in atime supporting
>> 	-v6:
>> 		* replace ubifs_warn with ubifs_msg
>> 		* rewrite the messages in Kconfig as Artem suggested
>> 		* remove S_VERSION related code
>>  fs/ubifs/Kconfig | 15 +++++++++++++++
>>  fs/ubifs/dir.c   |  3 +++
>>  fs/ubifs/file.c  | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  fs/ubifs/super.c | 12 ++++++++++--
>>  fs/ubifs/ubifs.h |  1 +
>>  5 files changed, 77 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/ubifs/Kconfig b/fs/ubifs/Kconfig
>> index ba66d50..7ff7712 100644
>> --- a/fs/ubifs/Kconfig
>> +++ b/fs/ubifs/Kconfig
>> @@ -35,3 +35,18 @@ config UBIFS_FS_ZLIB
>>  	default y
>>  	help
>>  	  Zlib compresses better than LZO but it is slower. Say 'Y' if unsure.
>> +
>> +config UBIFS_ATIME_SUPPORT
>> +	bool "Access time support" if UBIFS_FS
>> +	depends on UBIFS_FS
>> +	default n
>> +	help
>> +	  Originally UBIFS did not support atime, because it looked like a bad idea due
>> +	  increased flash wear. This option adds atime support and it is disabled by default
>> +	  to preserve the old behavior. If you enable this option, UBIFS starts updating atime,
>> +	  which means that file-system read operations will cause writes (inode atime
>> +	  updates). This may affect file-system performance and increase flash device wear,
>> +	  so be careful. How often atime is updated depends on the selected strategy:
>> +	  strictatime is the "heavy", relatime is "lighter", etc.
>> +
>> +	  If unsure, say 'N'
>> diff --git a/fs/ubifs/dir.c b/fs/ubifs/dir.c
>> index 27060fc..8d93427 100644
>> --- a/fs/ubifs/dir.c
>> +++ b/fs/ubifs/dir.c
>> @@ -1187,6 +1187,9 @@ const struct inode_operations ubifs_dir_inode_operations = {
>>  	.getxattr    = ubifs_getxattr,
>>  	.listxattr   = ubifs_listxattr,
>>  	.removexattr = ubifs_removexattr,
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_UBIFS_ATIME_SUPPORT
>> +	.update_time = ubifs_update_time,
>> +#endif
>>  };
>>  
>>  const struct file_operations ubifs_dir_operations = {
>> diff --git a/fs/ubifs/file.c b/fs/ubifs/file.c
>> index 35efc10..423ce6b 100644
>> --- a/fs/ubifs/file.c
>> +++ b/fs/ubifs/file.c
>> @@ -1364,6 +1364,45 @@ static inline int mctime_update_needed(const struct inode *inode,
>>  }
>>  
>>  /**
>> + * ubifs_update_time - update time of inode.
>> + * @inode: inode to update
>> + *
>> + * This function updates time of the inode.
>> + */
>> +int ubifs_update_time(struct inode *inode, struct timespec *time,
>> +			     int flags)
> 
> This function should be under an "#ifdef CONFIG_UBIFS_ATIME_SUPPORT".
> 
> Beside of that,
> Reviewed-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
> 
> I think we can queue it for v4.4. Artem, what do you think?

Yang, ping?
Artem and I would like to have this in v4.4.

Thanks,
//richard

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v6] ubifs: introduce UBIFS_ATIME_SUPPORT to ubifs
  2015-11-06  9:25   ` Richard Weinberger
@ 2015-11-07  4:35     ` Dongsheng Yang
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Dongsheng Yang @ 2015-11-07  4:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Richard Weinberger, dedekind1; +Cc: linux-mtd, linux-fsdevel

On 11/06/2015 05:25 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> Am 03.10.2015 um 20:34 schrieb Richard Weinberger:
>> Am 21.08.2015 um 05:10 schrieb Dongsheng Yang:
>>> To make ubifs support atime flexily, this commit introduces
>>> a Kconfig option named as UBIFS_ATIME_SUPPORT.
>>>
>>> With UBIFS_ATIME_SUPPORT=n:
>>> 	ubifs keeps the full compatibility to no_atime from
>>> the start of ubifs.
>>> =================UBIFS_ATIME_SUPPORT=n=======================
>>> -o - no atime
>>> -o atime - no atime
>>> -o noatime - no atime
>>> -o relatime - no atime
>>> -o strictatime - no atime
>>> -o lazyatime - no atime
>>>
>>> With UBIFS_ATIME_SUPPORT=y:
>>> 	ubifs supports the atime same with other main stream
>>> file systems.
>>> =================UBIFS_ATIME_SUPPORT=y=======================
>>> -o - default behavior (relatime currently)
>>> -o atime - atime support
>>> -o noatime - no atime support
>>> -o relatime - relative atime support
>>> -o strictatime - strict atime support
>>> -o lazyatime - lazy atime support
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Dongsheng Yang <yangds.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
>>> ---
>>> 	-v2:
>>> 		implement update_time for ubifs
>>> 	-v3:
>>> 		Oops, forgot to assign update_time for
>>> 		ubifs_dir_inode_operations.
>>> 	-v4:
>>> 		drop the patch to change 'Y' to 'N' in
>>> 		Kconfig
>>> 	-v5:
>>> 		simplify the warning in atime supporting
>>> 	-v6:
>>> 		* replace ubifs_warn with ubifs_msg
>>> 		* rewrite the messages in Kconfig as Artem suggested
>>> 		* remove S_VERSION related code
>>>   fs/ubifs/Kconfig | 15 +++++++++++++++
>>>   fs/ubifs/dir.c   |  3 +++
>>>   fs/ubifs/file.c  | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>   fs/ubifs/super.c | 12 ++++++++++--
>>>   fs/ubifs/ubifs.h |  1 +
>>>   5 files changed, 77 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/fs/ubifs/Kconfig b/fs/ubifs/Kconfig
>>> index ba66d50..7ff7712 100644
>>> --- a/fs/ubifs/Kconfig
>>> +++ b/fs/ubifs/Kconfig
>>> @@ -35,3 +35,18 @@ config UBIFS_FS_ZLIB
>>>   	default y
>>>   	help
>>>   	  Zlib compresses better than LZO but it is slower. Say 'Y' if unsure.
>>> +
>>> +config UBIFS_ATIME_SUPPORT
>>> +	bool "Access time support" if UBIFS_FS
>>> +	depends on UBIFS_FS
>>> +	default n
>>> +	help
>>> +	  Originally UBIFS did not support atime, because it looked like a bad idea due
>>> +	  increased flash wear. This option adds atime support and it is disabled by default
>>> +	  to preserve the old behavior. If you enable this option, UBIFS starts updating atime,
>>> +	  which means that file-system read operations will cause writes (inode atime
>>> +	  updates). This may affect file-system performance and increase flash device wear,
>>> +	  so be careful. How often atime is updated depends on the selected strategy:
>>> +	  strictatime is the "heavy", relatime is "lighter", etc.
>>> +
>>> +	  If unsure, say 'N'
>>> diff --git a/fs/ubifs/dir.c b/fs/ubifs/dir.c
>>> index 27060fc..8d93427 100644
>>> --- a/fs/ubifs/dir.c
>>> +++ b/fs/ubifs/dir.c
>>> @@ -1187,6 +1187,9 @@ const struct inode_operations ubifs_dir_inode_operations = {
>>>   	.getxattr    = ubifs_getxattr,
>>>   	.listxattr   = ubifs_listxattr,
>>>   	.removexattr = ubifs_removexattr,
>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_UBIFS_ATIME_SUPPORT
>>> +	.update_time = ubifs_update_time,
>>> +#endif
>>>   };
>>>
>>>   const struct file_operations ubifs_dir_operations = {
>>> diff --git a/fs/ubifs/file.c b/fs/ubifs/file.c
>>> index 35efc10..423ce6b 100644
>>> --- a/fs/ubifs/file.c
>>> +++ b/fs/ubifs/file.c
>>> @@ -1364,6 +1364,45 @@ static inline int mctime_update_needed(const struct inode *inode,
>>>   }
>>>
>>>   /**
>>> + * ubifs_update_time - update time of inode.
>>> + * @inode: inode to update
>>> + *
>>> + * This function updates time of the inode.
>>> + */
>>> +int ubifs_update_time(struct inode *inode, struct timespec *time,
>>> +			     int flags)
>>
>> This function should be under an "#ifdef CONFIG_UBIFS_ATIME_SUPPORT".
>>
>> Beside of that,
>> Reviewed-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
>>
>> I think we can queue it for v4.4. Artem, what do you think?
>
> Yang, ping?

Oh, forgot to update it! Will send a V7 soon.

Yang
> Artem and I would like to have this in v4.4.
>
> Thanks,
> //richard
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> .
>


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2015-11-07  4:42 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-08-21  3:10 [PATCH v6] ubifs: introduce UBIFS_ATIME_SUPPORT to ubifs Dongsheng Yang
2015-10-03 18:34 ` Richard Weinberger
2015-11-06  9:25   ` Richard Weinberger
2015-11-07  4:35     ` Dongsheng Yang

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.