All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH 1/3] Bluetooth: hci_intel: Implement LPM suspend/resume
@ 2015-09-01 14:42 Loic Poulain
  2015-09-01 14:42 ` [PATCH 2/3] Bluetooth: hci_intel: Add PM support Loic Poulain
                   ` (2 more replies)
  0 siblings, 3 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Loic Poulain @ 2015-09-01 14:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: marcel; +Cc: linux-bluetooth, Loic Poulain

Add LPM PM suspend/resume/host_wake LPM functions.
A LPM transaction is composed with a LPM request and ack/response.
Host can send a LPM suspend/resume request to the controller which
should respond with a LPM ack.
If resume is requested by the controller (irq), host has to send a LPM
ack once resumed.

Signed-off-by: Loic Poulain <loic.poulain@intel.com>
---
 drivers/bluetooth/hci_intel.c | 156 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 156 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/bluetooth/hci_intel.c b/drivers/bluetooth/hci_intel.c
index 5d53185..387961a 100644
--- a/drivers/bluetooth/hci_intel.c
+++ b/drivers/bluetooth/hci_intel.c
@@ -46,12 +46,17 @@
 #define STATE_BOOTING		4
 #define STATE_LPM_ENABLED	5
 #define STATE_TX_ACTIVE		6
+#define STATE_SUSPENDED		7
+#define STATE_LPM_TRANSACTION	8
 
+#define HCI_LPM_WAKE_PKT 0xf0
 #define HCI_LPM_PKT 0xf1
 #define HCI_LPM_MAX_SIZE 10
 #define HCI_LPM_HDR_SIZE HCI_EVENT_HDR_SIZE
 
 #define LPM_OP_TX_NOTIFY 0x00
+#define LPM_OP_SUSPEND_ACK 0x02
+#define LPM_OP_RESUME_ACK 0x03
 
 struct hci_lpm_pkt {
 	__u8 opcode;
@@ -129,6 +134,28 @@ static int intel_wait_booting(struct hci_uart *hu)
 	return err;
 }
 
+static int intel_wait_lpm_transaction(struct hci_uart *hu)
+{
+	struct intel_data *intel = hu->priv;
+	int err;
+
+	err = wait_on_bit_timeout(&intel->flags, STATE_LPM_TRANSACTION,
+				  TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE,
+				  msecs_to_jiffies(1000));
+
+	if (err == 1) {
+		bt_dev_err(hu->hdev, "LPM transaction interrupted");
+		return -EINTR;
+	}
+
+	if (err) {
+		bt_dev_err(hu->hdev, "LPM transaction timeout");
+		return -ETIMEDOUT;
+	}
+
+	return err;
+}
+
 static irqreturn_t intel_irq(int irq, void *dev_id)
 {
 	struct intel_device *idev = dev_id;
@@ -800,12 +827,28 @@ static void intel_recv_lpm_notify(struct hci_dev *hdev, int value)
 static int intel_recv_lpm(struct hci_dev *hdev, struct sk_buff *skb)
 {
 	struct hci_lpm_pkt *lpm = (void *)skb->data;
+	struct hci_uart *hu = hci_get_drvdata(hdev);
+	struct intel_data *intel = hu->priv;
 
 	switch (lpm->opcode) {
 	case LPM_OP_TX_NOTIFY:
 		if (lpm->dlen)
 			intel_recv_lpm_notify(hdev, lpm->data[0]);
 		break;
+	case LPM_OP_SUSPEND_ACK:
+		set_bit(STATE_SUSPENDED, &intel->flags);
+		if (test_and_clear_bit(STATE_LPM_TRANSACTION, &intel->flags)) {
+			smp_mb__after_atomic();
+			wake_up_bit(&intel->flags, STATE_LPM_TRANSACTION);
+		}
+		break;
+	case LPM_OP_RESUME_ACK:
+		clear_bit(STATE_SUSPENDED, &intel->flags);
+		if (test_and_clear_bit(STATE_LPM_TRANSACTION, &intel->flags)) {
+			smp_mb__after_atomic();
+			wake_up_bit(&intel->flags, STATE_LPM_TRANSACTION);
+		}
+		break;
 	default:
 		bt_dev_err(hdev, "Unknown LPM opcode (%02x)", lpm->opcode);
 		break;
@@ -890,6 +933,119 @@ static struct sk_buff *intel_dequeue(struct hci_uart *hu)
 	return skb;
 }
 
+static int intel_lpm_suspend(struct hci_uart *hu)
+{
+	static const u8 suspend[] = {0x01, 0x01, 0x01};
+	struct intel_data *intel = hu->priv;
+	struct sk_buff *skb;
+
+	if (!test_bit(STATE_LPM_ENABLED, &intel->flags) ||
+	    test_bit(STATE_SUSPENDED, &intel->flags))
+		return 0;
+
+	if (test_bit(STATE_TX_ACTIVE, &intel->flags))
+		return -EAGAIN;
+
+	bt_dev_dbg(hu->hdev, "Suspending");
+
+	skb = bt_skb_alloc(sizeof(suspend), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!skb) {
+		bt_dev_err(hu->hdev, "Failed to alloc memory for LPM packet");
+		return -ENOMEM;
+	}
+
+	memcpy(skb_put(skb, sizeof(suspend)), suspend, sizeof(suspend));
+	bt_cb(skb)->pkt_type = HCI_LPM_PKT;
+
+	set_bit(STATE_LPM_TRANSACTION, &intel->flags);
+
+	skb_queue_tail(&intel->txq, skb);
+	hci_uart_tx_wakeup(hu);
+
+	intel_wait_lpm_transaction(hu);
+
+	clear_bit(STATE_LPM_TRANSACTION, &intel->flags);
+
+	if (!test_bit(STATE_SUSPENDED, &intel->flags)) {
+		bt_dev_err(hu->hdev, "Device suspend error");
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+
+	bt_dev_dbg(hu->hdev, "Suspended");
+
+	hci_uart_set_flow_control(hu, true);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int intel_lpm_resume(struct hci_uart *hu)
+{
+	struct intel_data *intel = hu->priv;
+	struct sk_buff *skb;
+
+	if (!test_bit(STATE_LPM_ENABLED, &intel->flags) ||
+	    !test_bit(STATE_SUSPENDED, &intel->flags))
+		return 0;
+
+	bt_dev_dbg(hu->hdev, "Resuming");
+
+	hci_uart_set_flow_control(hu, false);
+
+	skb = bt_skb_alloc(0, GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!skb) {
+		bt_dev_err(hu->hdev, "Failed to alloc memory for LPM packet");
+		return -ENOMEM;
+	}
+
+	bt_cb(skb)->pkt_type = HCI_LPM_WAKE_PKT;
+
+	set_bit(STATE_LPM_TRANSACTION, &intel->flags);
+
+	skb_queue_tail(&intel->txq, skb);
+	hci_uart_tx_wakeup(hu);
+
+	intel_wait_lpm_transaction(hu);
+
+	clear_bit(STATE_LPM_TRANSACTION, &intel->flags);
+
+	if (test_bit(STATE_SUSPENDED, &intel->flags)) {
+		bt_dev_err(hu->hdev, "Device resume error");
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+
+	bt_dev_dbg(hu->hdev, "Resumed");
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int intel_lpm_host_wake(struct hci_uart *hu)
+{
+	static const u8 lpm_resume_ack[] = {LPM_OP_RESUME_ACK, 0x00};
+	struct intel_data *intel = hu->priv;
+	struct sk_buff *skb;
+
+	hci_uart_set_flow_control(hu, false);
+
+	clear_bit(STATE_SUSPENDED, &intel->flags);
+
+	skb = bt_skb_alloc(sizeof(lpm_resume_ack), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!skb) {
+		bt_dev_err(hu->hdev, "Failed to alloc memory for LPM packet");
+		return -ENOMEM;
+	}
+
+	memcpy(skb_put(skb, sizeof(lpm_resume_ack)), lpm_resume_ack,
+	       sizeof(lpm_resume_ack));
+	bt_cb(skb)->pkt_type = HCI_LPM_PKT;
+
+	skb_queue_tail(&intel->txq, skb);
+	hci_uart_tx_wakeup(hu);
+
+	bt_dev_dbg(hu->hdev, "Resumed by controller");
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static const struct hci_uart_proto intel_proto = {
 	.id		= HCI_UART_INTEL,
 	.name		= "Intel",
-- 
1.9.1

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 2/3] Bluetooth: hci_intel: Add PM support
  2015-09-01 14:42 [PATCH 1/3] Bluetooth: hci_intel: Implement LPM suspend/resume Loic Poulain
@ 2015-09-01 14:42 ` Loic Poulain
  2015-09-01 15:05   ` Marcel Holtmann
  2015-09-01 14:42 ` [PATCH 3/3] Bluetooth: hci_intel: Add runtime " Loic Poulain
  2015-09-01 15:00 ` [PATCH 1/3] Bluetooth: hci_intel: Implement LPM suspend/resume Marcel Holtmann
  2 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Loic Poulain @ 2015-09-01 14:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: marcel; +Cc: linux-bluetooth, Loic Poulain

Add PM suspend/resume callbacks which call lpm_suspend/resume.
Add LPM ack in threaded IRQ handler to notify the controller that
resume is complete.
Protect hci_uart against concurrent removing during suspend/resume.

Signed-off-by: Loic Poulain <loic.poulain@intel.com>
---
 drivers/bluetooth/hci_intel.c | 66 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 58 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/bluetooth/hci_intel.c b/drivers/bluetooth/hci_intel.c
index 387961a..8651803 100644
--- a/drivers/bluetooth/hci_intel.c
+++ b/drivers/bluetooth/hci_intel.c
@@ -68,6 +68,8 @@ struct intel_device {
 	struct list_head list;
 	struct platform_device *pdev;
 	struct gpio_desc *reset;
+	struct hci_uart *hu;
+	struct mutex hu_lock;
 	int irq;
 };
 
@@ -156,14 +158,7 @@ static int intel_wait_lpm_transaction(struct hci_uart *hu)
 	return err;
 }
 
-static irqreturn_t intel_irq(int irq, void *dev_id)
-{
-	struct intel_device *idev = dev_id;
-
-	dev_info(&idev->pdev->dev, "hci_intel irq\n");
-
-	return IRQ_HANDLED;
-}
+static irqreturn_t intel_irq(int irq, void *dev_id);
 
 static int intel_set_power(struct hci_uart *hu, bool powered)
 {
@@ -192,6 +187,10 @@ static int intel_set_power(struct hci_uart *hu, bool powered)
 
 		gpiod_set_value(idev->reset, powered);
 
+		mutex_lock(&idev->hu_lock);
+		idev->hu = powered ? hu : NULL;
+		mutex_unlock(&idev->hu_lock);
+
 		if (idev->irq < 0)
 			break;
 
@@ -1061,6 +1060,20 @@ static const struct hci_uart_proto intel_proto = {
 	.dequeue	= intel_dequeue,
 };
 
+static irqreturn_t intel_irq(int irq, void *dev_id)
+{
+	struct intel_device *idev = dev_id;
+
+	dev_info(&idev->pdev->dev, "hci_intel irq\n");
+
+	mutex_lock(&idev->hu_lock);
+	if (idev->hu)
+		intel_lpm_host_wake(idev->hu);
+	mutex_unlock(&idev->hu_lock);
+
+	return IRQ_HANDLED;
+}
+
 #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
 static const struct acpi_device_id intel_acpi_match[] = {
 	{ "INT33E1", 0 },
@@ -1085,6 +1098,40 @@ static int intel_acpi_probe(struct intel_device *idev)
 }
 #endif
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
+static int intel_suspend(struct device *dev)
+{
+	struct intel_device *idev = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
+
+	dev_dbg(dev, "intel_suspend");
+
+	mutex_lock(&idev->hu_lock);
+	if (idev->hu)
+		intel_lpm_suspend(idev->hu);
+	mutex_unlock(&idev->hu_lock);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int intel_resume(struct device *dev)
+{
+	struct intel_device *idev = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
+
+	dev_dbg(dev, "intel_resume");
+
+	mutex_lock(&idev->hu_lock);
+	if (idev->hu)
+		intel_lpm_resume(idev->hu);
+	mutex_unlock(&idev->hu_lock);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+#endif
+
+static const struct dev_pm_ops intel_pm_ops = {
+	SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(intel_suspend, intel_resume)
+};
+
 static int intel_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 {
 	struct intel_device *idev;
@@ -1093,6 +1140,8 @@ static int intel_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	if (!idev)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
+	mutex_init(&idev->hu_lock);
+
 	idev->pdev = pdev;
 
 	if (ACPI_HANDLE(&pdev->dev)) {
@@ -1169,6 +1218,7 @@ static struct platform_driver intel_driver = {
 	.driver = {
 		.name = "hci_intel",
 		.acpi_match_table = ACPI_PTR(intel_acpi_match),
+		.pm = &intel_pm_ops,
 	},
 };
 
-- 
1.9.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 3/3] Bluetooth: hci_intel: Add runtime PM support
  2015-09-01 14:42 [PATCH 1/3] Bluetooth: hci_intel: Implement LPM suspend/resume Loic Poulain
  2015-09-01 14:42 ` [PATCH 2/3] Bluetooth: hci_intel: Add PM support Loic Poulain
@ 2015-09-01 14:42 ` Loic Poulain
  2015-09-01 15:09   ` Marcel Holtmann
  2015-09-01 15:00 ` [PATCH 1/3] Bluetooth: hci_intel: Implement LPM suspend/resume Marcel Holtmann
  2 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Loic Poulain @ 2015-09-01 14:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: marcel; +Cc: linux-bluetooth, Loic Poulain

Implement runtime PM suspend/resume callbacks.
If LPM supported, controller is put into supsend after a delay of
inactivity (1s). Inactivity is based on LPM idle notification and
host TX traffic.

Signed-off-by: Loic Poulain <loic.poulain@intel.com>
---
 drivers/bluetooth/hci_intel.c | 97 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 95 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/bluetooth/hci_intel.c b/drivers/bluetooth/hci_intel.c
index 8651803..622d28d 100644
--- a/drivers/bluetooth/hci_intel.c
+++ b/drivers/bluetooth/hci_intel.c
@@ -32,6 +32,7 @@
 #include <linux/gpio/consumer.h>
 #include <linux/acpi.h>
 #include <linux/interrupt.h>
+#include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
 
 #include <net/bluetooth/bluetooth.h>
 #include <net/bluetooth/hci_core.h>
@@ -58,6 +59,8 @@
 #define LPM_OP_SUSPEND_ACK 0x02
 #define LPM_OP_RESUME_ACK 0x03
 
+#define LPM_SUSPEND_DELAY_MS 1000
+
 struct hci_lpm_pkt {
 	__u8 opcode;
 	__u8 dlen;
@@ -79,6 +82,8 @@ static DEFINE_MUTEX(intel_device_list_lock);
 struct intel_data {
 	struct sk_buff *rx_skb;
 	struct sk_buff_head txq;
+	struct work_struct busy_work;
+	struct hci_uart *hu;
 	unsigned long flags;
 };
 
@@ -207,9 +212,17 @@ static int intel_set_power(struct hci_uart *hu, bool powered)
 			}
 
 			device_wakeup_enable(&idev->pdev->dev);
+
+			pm_runtime_set_active(&idev->pdev->dev);
+			pm_runtime_use_autosuspend(&idev->pdev->dev);
+			pm_runtime_set_autosuspend_delay(&idev->pdev->dev,
+							 LPM_SUSPEND_DELAY_MS);
+			pm_runtime_enable(&idev->pdev->dev);
 		} else if (!powered && device_may_wakeup(&idev->pdev->dev)) {
 			devm_free_irq(&idev->pdev->dev, idev->irq, idev);
 			device_wakeup_disable(&idev->pdev->dev);
+
+			pm_runtime_disable(&idev->pdev->dev);
 		}
 	}
 
@@ -218,6 +231,27 @@ static int intel_set_power(struct hci_uart *hu, bool powered)
 	return err;
 }
 
+static void intel_busy_work(struct work_struct *work)
+{
+	struct list_head *p;
+	struct intel_data *intel = container_of(work, struct intel_data,
+						busy_work);
+
+	mutex_lock(&intel_device_list_lock);
+	list_for_each(p, &intel_device_list) {
+		struct intel_device *idev = list_entry(p, struct intel_device,
+						      list);
+
+		if (intel->hu->tty->dev->parent == idev->pdev->dev.parent) {
+			pm_runtime_get(&idev->pdev->dev);
+			pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(&idev->pdev->dev);
+			pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(&idev->pdev->dev);
+			break;
+		}
+	}
+	mutex_unlock(&intel_device_list_lock);
+}
+
 static int intel_open(struct hci_uart *hu)
 {
 	struct intel_data *intel;
@@ -229,6 +263,9 @@ static int intel_open(struct hci_uart *hu)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
 	skb_queue_head_init(&intel->txq);
+	INIT_WORK(&intel->busy_work, intel_busy_work);
+
+	intel->hu = hu;
 
 	hu->priv = intel;
 
@@ -246,6 +283,8 @@ static int intel_close(struct hci_uart *hu)
 
 	intel_set_power(hu, false);
 
+	cancel_work_sync(&intel->busy_work);
+
 	skb_queue_purge(&intel->txq);
 	kfree_skb(intel->rx_skb);
 	kfree(intel);
@@ -817,10 +856,12 @@ static void intel_recv_lpm_notify(struct hci_dev *hdev, int value)
 
 	bt_dev_dbg(hdev, "TX idle notification (%d)", value);
 
-	if (value)
+	if (value) {
 		set_bit(STATE_TX_ACTIVE, &intel->flags);
-	else
+		schedule_work(&intel->busy_work);
+	} else {
 		clear_bit(STATE_TX_ACTIVE, &intel->flags);
+	}
 }
 
 static int intel_recv_lpm(struct hci_dev *hdev, struct sk_buff *skb)
@@ -895,9 +936,24 @@ static int intel_recv(struct hci_uart *hu, const void *data, int count)
 static int intel_enqueue(struct hci_uart *hu, struct sk_buff *skb)
 {
 	struct intel_data *intel = hu->priv;
+	struct list_head *p;
 
 	BT_DBG("hu %p skb %p", hu, skb);
 
+	mutex_lock(&intel_device_list_lock);
+	list_for_each(p, &intel_device_list) {
+		struct intel_device *idev = list_entry(p, struct intel_device,
+						      list);
+
+		if (hu->tty->dev->parent == idev->pdev->dev.parent) {
+			pm_runtime_get_sync(&idev->pdev->dev);
+			pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(&idev->pdev->dev);
+			pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(&idev->pdev->dev);
+			break;
+		}
+	}
+	mutex_unlock(&intel_device_list_lock);
+
 	skb_queue_tail(&intel->txq, skb);
 
 	return 0;
@@ -1071,6 +1127,10 @@ static irqreturn_t intel_irq(int irq, void *dev_id)
 		intel_lpm_host_wake(idev->hu);
 	mutex_unlock(&idev->hu_lock);
 
+	pm_runtime_get(&idev->pdev->dev);
+	pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(&idev->pdev->dev);
+	pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(&idev->pdev->dev);
+
 	return IRQ_HANDLED;
 }
 
@@ -1128,8 +1188,41 @@ static int intel_resume(struct device *dev)
 }
 #endif
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_PM
+static int intel_rt_suspend(struct device *dev)
+{
+	struct intel_device *idev = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
+	int err = 0;
+
+	dev_dbg(dev, "intel_suspend");
+
+	mutex_lock(&idev->hu_lock);
+	if (idev->hu)
+		err = intel_lpm_suspend(idev->hu);
+	mutex_unlock(&idev->hu_lock);
+
+	return err;
+}
+
+static int intel_rt_resume(struct device *dev)
+{
+	struct intel_device *idev = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
+	int err = 0;
+
+	dev_dbg(dev, "intel_resume");
+
+	mutex_lock(&idev->hu_lock);
+	if (idev->hu)
+		err = intel_lpm_resume(idev->hu);
+	mutex_unlock(&idev->hu_lock);
+
+	return err;
+}
+#endif
+
 static const struct dev_pm_ops intel_pm_ops = {
 	SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(intel_suspend, intel_resume)
+	SET_RUNTIME_PM_OPS(intel_rt_suspend, intel_rt_resume, NULL)
 };
 
 static int intel_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
-- 
1.9.1

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 1/3] Bluetooth: hci_intel: Implement LPM suspend/resume
  2015-09-01 14:42 [PATCH 1/3] Bluetooth: hci_intel: Implement LPM suspend/resume Loic Poulain
  2015-09-01 14:42 ` [PATCH 2/3] Bluetooth: hci_intel: Add PM support Loic Poulain
  2015-09-01 14:42 ` [PATCH 3/3] Bluetooth: hci_intel: Add runtime " Loic Poulain
@ 2015-09-01 15:00 ` Marcel Holtmann
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Marcel Holtmann @ 2015-09-01 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Loic Poulain; +Cc: linux-bluetooth

Hi Loic,

> Add LPM PM suspend/resume/host_wake LPM functions.
> A LPM transaction is composed with a LPM request and ack/response.
> Host can send a LPM suspend/resume request to the controller which
> should respond with a LPM ack.
> If resume is requested by the controller (irq), host has to send a LPM
> ack once resumed.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Loic Poulain <loic.poulain@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/bluetooth/hci_intel.c | 156 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 156 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/bluetooth/hci_intel.c b/drivers/bluetooth/hci_intel.c
> index 5d53185..387961a 100644
> --- a/drivers/bluetooth/hci_intel.c
> +++ b/drivers/bluetooth/hci_intel.c
> @@ -46,12 +46,17 @@
> #define STATE_BOOTING		4
> #define STATE_LPM_ENABLED	5
> #define STATE_TX_ACTIVE		6
> +#define STATE_SUSPENDED		7
> +#define STATE_LPM_TRANSACTION	8
> 
> +#define HCI_LPM_WAKE_PKT 0xf0
> #define HCI_LPM_PKT 0xf1
> #define HCI_LPM_MAX_SIZE 10
> #define HCI_LPM_HDR_SIZE HCI_EVENT_HDR_SIZE
> 
> #define LPM_OP_TX_NOTIFY 0x00
> +#define LPM_OP_SUSPEND_ACK 0x02
> +#define LPM_OP_RESUME_ACK 0x03
> 
> struct hci_lpm_pkt {
> 	__u8 opcode;
> @@ -129,6 +134,28 @@ static int intel_wait_booting(struct hci_uart *hu)
> 	return err;
> }
> 
> +static int intel_wait_lpm_transaction(struct hci_uart *hu)
> +{
> +	struct intel_data *intel = hu->priv;
> +	int err;
> +
> +	err = wait_on_bit_timeout(&intel->flags, STATE_LPM_TRANSACTION,
> +				  TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE,
> +				  msecs_to_jiffies(1000));
> +
> +	if (err == 1) {
> +		bt_dev_err(hu->hdev, "LPM transaction interrupted");
> +		return -EINTR;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (err) {
> +		bt_dev_err(hu->hdev, "LPM transaction timeout");
> +		return -ETIMEDOUT;
> +	}
> +
> +	return err;
> +}
> +
> static irqreturn_t intel_irq(int irq, void *dev_id)
> {
> 	struct intel_device *idev = dev_id;
> @@ -800,12 +827,28 @@ static void intel_recv_lpm_notify(struct hci_dev *hdev, int value)
> static int intel_recv_lpm(struct hci_dev *hdev, struct sk_buff *skb)
> {
> 	struct hci_lpm_pkt *lpm = (void *)skb->data;
> +	struct hci_uart *hu = hci_get_drvdata(hdev);
> +	struct intel_data *intel = hu->priv;
> 
> 	switch (lpm->opcode) {
> 	case LPM_OP_TX_NOTIFY:
> 		if (lpm->dlen)
> 			intel_recv_lpm_notify(hdev, lpm->data[0]);
> 		break;
> +	case LPM_OP_SUSPEND_ACK:
> +		set_bit(STATE_SUSPENDED, &intel->flags);
> +		if (test_and_clear_bit(STATE_LPM_TRANSACTION, &intel->flags)) {
> +			smp_mb__after_atomic();
> +			wake_up_bit(&intel->flags, STATE_LPM_TRANSACTION);
> +		}
> +		break;
> +	case LPM_OP_RESUME_ACK:
> +		clear_bit(STATE_SUSPENDED, &intel->flags);
> +		if (test_and_clear_bit(STATE_LPM_TRANSACTION, &intel->flags)) {
> +			smp_mb__after_atomic();
> +			wake_up_bit(&intel->flags, STATE_LPM_TRANSACTION);
> +		}
> +		break;
> 	default:
> 		bt_dev_err(hdev, "Unknown LPM opcode (%02x)", lpm->opcode);
> 		break;
> @@ -890,6 +933,119 @@ static struct sk_buff *intel_dequeue(struct hci_uart *hu)
> 	return skb;
> }
> 
> +static int intel_lpm_suspend(struct hci_uart *hu)
> +{
> +	static const u8 suspend[] = {0x01, 0x01, 0x01};

coding style please here. There are space before } and after {.

> +	struct intel_data *intel = hu->priv;
> +	struct sk_buff *skb;
> +
> +	if (!test_bit(STATE_LPM_ENABLED, &intel->flags) ||
> +	    test_bit(STATE_SUSPENDED, &intel->flags))
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	if (test_bit(STATE_TX_ACTIVE, &intel->flags))
> +		return -EAGAIN;
> +
> +	bt_dev_dbg(hu->hdev, "Suspending");
> +
> +	skb = bt_skb_alloc(sizeof(suspend), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!skb) {
> +		bt_dev_err(hu->hdev, "Failed to alloc memory for LPM packet");
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +	}
> +
> +	memcpy(skb_put(skb, sizeof(suspend)), suspend, sizeof(suspend));
> +	bt_cb(skb)->pkt_type = HCI_LPM_PKT;
> +
> +	set_bit(STATE_LPM_TRANSACTION, &intel->flags);
> +
> +	skb_queue_tail(&intel->txq, skb);
> +	hci_uart_tx_wakeup(hu);
> +
> +	intel_wait_lpm_transaction(hu);
> +
> +	clear_bit(STATE_LPM_TRANSACTION, &intel->flags);
> +
> +	if (!test_bit(STATE_SUSPENDED, &intel->flags)) {
> +		bt_dev_err(hu->hdev, "Device suspend error");
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	}
> +
> +	bt_dev_dbg(hu->hdev, "Suspended");
> +
> +	hci_uart_set_flow_control(hu, true);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int intel_lpm_resume(struct hci_uart *hu)
> +{
> +	struct intel_data *intel = hu->priv;
> +	struct sk_buff *skb;
> +
> +	if (!test_bit(STATE_LPM_ENABLED, &intel->flags) ||
> +	    !test_bit(STATE_SUSPENDED, &intel->flags))
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	bt_dev_dbg(hu->hdev, "Resuming");
> +
> +	hci_uart_set_flow_control(hu, false);
> +
> +	skb = bt_skb_alloc(0, GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!skb) {
> +		bt_dev_err(hu->hdev, "Failed to alloc memory for LPM packet");
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +	}
> +
> +	bt_cb(skb)->pkt_type = HCI_LPM_WAKE_PKT;
> +
> +	set_bit(STATE_LPM_TRANSACTION, &intel->flags);
> +
> +	skb_queue_tail(&intel->txq, skb);
> +	hci_uart_tx_wakeup(hu);
> +
> +	intel_wait_lpm_transaction(hu);
> +
> +	clear_bit(STATE_LPM_TRANSACTION, &intel->flags);
> +
> +	if (test_bit(STATE_SUSPENDED, &intel->flags)) {
> +		bt_dev_err(hu->hdev, "Device resume error");
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	}
> +
> +	bt_dev_dbg(hu->hdev, "Resumed");
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int intel_lpm_host_wake(struct hci_uart *hu)
> +{
> +	static const u8 lpm_resume_ack[] = {LPM_OP_RESUME_ACK, 0x00};

Same as above. Please fix coding style.

> +	struct intel_data *intel = hu->priv;
> +	struct sk_buff *skb;
> +
> +	hci_uart_set_flow_control(hu, false);
> +
> +	clear_bit(STATE_SUSPENDED, &intel->flags);
> +
> +	skb = bt_skb_alloc(sizeof(lpm_resume_ack), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!skb) {
> +		bt_dev_err(hu->hdev, "Failed to alloc memory for LPM packet");
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +	}
> +
> +	memcpy(skb_put(skb, sizeof(lpm_resume_ack)), lpm_resume_ack,
> +	       sizeof(lpm_resume_ack));
> +	bt_cb(skb)->pkt_type = HCI_LPM_PKT;
> +
> +	skb_queue_tail(&intel->txq, skb);
> +	hci_uart_tx_wakeup(hu);
> +
> +	bt_dev_dbg(hu->hdev, "Resumed by controller");
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> static const struct hci_uart_proto intel_proto = {
> 	.id		= HCI_UART_INTEL,
> 	.name		= "Intel",

Regards

Marcel


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 2/3] Bluetooth: hci_intel: Add PM support
  2015-09-01 14:42 ` [PATCH 2/3] Bluetooth: hci_intel: Add PM support Loic Poulain
@ 2015-09-01 15:05   ` Marcel Holtmann
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Marcel Holtmann @ 2015-09-01 15:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Loic Poulain; +Cc: linux-bluetooth

Hi Loic,

> Add PM suspend/resume callbacks which call lpm_suspend/resume.
> Add LPM ack in threaded IRQ handler to notify the controller that
> resume is complete.
> Protect hci_uart against concurrent removing during suspend/resume.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Loic Poulain <loic.poulain@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/bluetooth/hci_intel.c | 66 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 58 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/bluetooth/hci_intel.c b/drivers/bluetooth/hci_intel.c
> index 387961a..8651803 100644
> --- a/drivers/bluetooth/hci_intel.c
> +++ b/drivers/bluetooth/hci_intel.c
> @@ -68,6 +68,8 @@ struct intel_device {
> 	struct list_head list;
> 	struct platform_device *pdev;
> 	struct gpio_desc *reset;
> +	struct hci_uart *hu;
> +	struct mutex hu_lock;
> 	int irq;
> };
> 
> @@ -156,14 +158,7 @@ static int intel_wait_lpm_transaction(struct hci_uart *hu)
> 	return err;
> }
> 
> -static irqreturn_t intel_irq(int irq, void *dev_id)
> -{
> -	struct intel_device *idev = dev_id;
> -
> -	dev_info(&idev->pdev->dev, "hci_intel irq\n");
> -
> -	return IRQ_HANDLED;
> -}
> +static irqreturn_t intel_irq(int irq, void *dev_id);

I prefer to avoid forward declaration if possible. Can we get the code reordered?

> static int intel_set_power(struct hci_uart *hu, bool powered)
> {
> @@ -192,6 +187,10 @@ static int intel_set_power(struct hci_uart *hu, bool powered)
> 
> 		gpiod_set_value(idev->reset, powered);
> 
> +		mutex_lock(&idev->hu_lock);
> +		idev->hu = powered ? hu : NULL;
> +		mutex_unlock(&idev->hu_lock);
> +

I prefer if add a comment block around this code to explain why we are doing this.

> 		if (idev->irq < 0)
> 			break;
> 
> @@ -1061,6 +1060,20 @@ static const struct hci_uart_proto intel_proto = {
> 	.dequeue	= intel_dequeue,
> };
> 
> +static irqreturn_t intel_irq(int irq, void *dev_id)
> +{
> +	struct intel_device *idev = dev_id;
> +
> +	dev_info(&idev->pdev->dev, "hci_intel irq\n");
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&idev->hu_lock);
> +	if (idev->hu)
> +		intel_lpm_host_wake(idev->hu);
> +	mutex_unlock(&idev->hu_lock);
> +
> +	return IRQ_HANDLED;
> +}
> +
> #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
> static const struct acpi_device_id intel_acpi_match[] = {
> 	{ "INT33E1", 0 },
> @@ -1085,6 +1098,40 @@ static int intel_acpi_probe(struct intel_device *idev)
> }
> #endif
> 
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
> +static int intel_suspend(struct device *dev)
> +{
> +	struct intel_device *idev = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> +
> +	dev_dbg(dev, "intel_suspend");
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&idev->hu_lock);
> +	if (idev->hu)
> +		intel_lpm_suspend(idev->hu);
> +	mutex_unlock(&idev->hu_lock);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int intel_resume(struct device *dev)
> +{
> +	struct intel_device *idev = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> +
> +	dev_dbg(dev, "intel_resume");
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&idev->hu_lock);
> +	if (idev->hu)
> +		intel_lpm_resume(idev->hu);
> +	mutex_unlock(&idev->hu_lock);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +#endif
> +
> +static const struct dev_pm_ops intel_pm_ops = {
> +	SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(intel_suspend, intel_resume)
> +};
> +
> static int intel_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> 	struct intel_device *idev;
> @@ -1093,6 +1140,8 @@ static int intel_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> 	if (!idev)
> 		return -ENOMEM;
> 
> +	mutex_init(&idev->hu_lock);
> +
> 	idev->pdev = pdev;
> 
> 	if (ACPI_HANDLE(&pdev->dev)) {
> @@ -1169,6 +1218,7 @@ static struct platform_driver intel_driver = {
> 	.driver = {
> 		.name = "hci_intel",
> 		.acpi_match_table = ACPI_PTR(intel_acpi_match),
> +		.pm = &intel_pm_ops,
> 	},
> };

Regards

Marcel


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 3/3] Bluetooth: hci_intel: Add runtime PM support
  2015-09-01 14:42 ` [PATCH 3/3] Bluetooth: hci_intel: Add runtime " Loic Poulain
@ 2015-09-01 15:09   ` Marcel Holtmann
  2015-09-01 15:32     ` Loic Poulain
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Marcel Holtmann @ 2015-09-01 15:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Loic Poulain; +Cc: linux-bluetooth

Hi Loic,

> Implement runtime PM suspend/resume callbacks.
> If LPM supported, controller is put into supsend after a delay of
> inactivity (1s). Inactivity is based on LPM idle notification and
> host TX traffic.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Loic Poulain <loic.poulain@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/bluetooth/hci_intel.c | 97 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 95 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/bluetooth/hci_intel.c b/drivers/bluetooth/hci_intel.c
> index 8651803..622d28d 100644
> --- a/drivers/bluetooth/hci_intel.c
> +++ b/drivers/bluetooth/hci_intel.c
> @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@
> #include <linux/gpio/consumer.h>
> #include <linux/acpi.h>
> #include <linux/interrupt.h>
> +#include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
> 
> #include <net/bluetooth/bluetooth.h>
> #include <net/bluetooth/hci_core.h>
> @@ -58,6 +59,8 @@
> #define LPM_OP_SUSPEND_ACK 0x02
> #define LPM_OP_RESUME_ACK 0x03
> 
> +#define LPM_SUSPEND_DELAY_MS 1000
> +
> struct hci_lpm_pkt {
> 	__u8 opcode;
> 	__u8 dlen;
> @@ -79,6 +82,8 @@ static DEFINE_MUTEX(intel_device_list_lock);
> struct intel_data {
> 	struct sk_buff *rx_skb;
> 	struct sk_buff_head txq;
> +	struct work_struct busy_work;
> +	struct hci_uart *hu;
> 	unsigned long flags;
> };
> 
> @@ -207,9 +212,17 @@ static int intel_set_power(struct hci_uart *hu, bool powered)
> 			}
> 
> 			device_wakeup_enable(&idev->pdev->dev);
> +
> +			pm_runtime_set_active(&idev->pdev->dev);
> +			pm_runtime_use_autosuspend(&idev->pdev->dev);
> +			pm_runtime_set_autosuspend_delay(&idev->pdev->dev,
> +							 LPM_SUSPEND_DELAY_MS);
> +			pm_runtime_enable(&idev->pdev->dev);
> 		} else if (!powered && device_may_wakeup(&idev->pdev->dev)) {
> 			devm_free_irq(&idev->pdev->dev, idev->irq, idev);
> 			device_wakeup_disable(&idev->pdev->dev);
> +
> +			pm_runtime_disable(&idev->pdev->dev);
> 		}
> 	}
> 
> @@ -218,6 +231,27 @@ static int intel_set_power(struct hci_uart *hu, bool powered)
> 	return err;
> }
> 
> +static void intel_busy_work(struct work_struct *work)
> +{
> +	struct list_head *p;
> +	struct intel_data *intel = container_of(work, struct intel_data,
> +						busy_work);
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&intel_device_list_lock);
> +	list_for_each(p, &intel_device_list) {
> +		struct intel_device *idev = list_entry(p, struct intel_device,
> +						      list);
> +
> +		if (intel->hu->tty->dev->parent == idev->pdev->dev.parent) {
> +			pm_runtime_get(&idev->pdev->dev);
> +			pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(&idev->pdev->dev);
> +			pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(&idev->pdev->dev);
> +			break;
> +		}
> +	}
> +	mutex_unlock(&intel_device_list_lock);
> +}
> +
> static int intel_open(struct hci_uart *hu)
> {
> 	struct intel_data *intel;
> @@ -229,6 +263,9 @@ static int intel_open(struct hci_uart *hu)
> 		return -ENOMEM;
> 
> 	skb_queue_head_init(&intel->txq);
> +	INIT_WORK(&intel->busy_work, intel_busy_work);
> +
> +	intel->hu = hu;
> 
> 	hu->priv = intel;
> 
> @@ -246,6 +283,8 @@ static int intel_close(struct hci_uart *hu)
> 
> 	intel_set_power(hu, false);
> 
> +	cancel_work_sync(&intel->busy_work);
> +
> 	skb_queue_purge(&intel->txq);
> 	kfree_skb(intel->rx_skb);
> 	kfree(intel);
> @@ -817,10 +856,12 @@ static void intel_recv_lpm_notify(struct hci_dev *hdev, int value)
> 
> 	bt_dev_dbg(hdev, "TX idle notification (%d)", value);
> 
> -	if (value)
> +	if (value) {
> 		set_bit(STATE_TX_ACTIVE, &intel->flags);
> -	else
> +		schedule_work(&intel->busy_work);
> +	} else {
> 		clear_bit(STATE_TX_ACTIVE, &intel->flags);
> +	}
> }
> 
> static int intel_recv_lpm(struct hci_dev *hdev, struct sk_buff *skb)
> @@ -895,9 +936,24 @@ static int intel_recv(struct hci_uart *hu, const void *data, int count)
> static int intel_enqueue(struct hci_uart *hu, struct sk_buff *skb)
> {
> 	struct intel_data *intel = hu->priv;
> +	struct list_head *p;
> 
> 	BT_DBG("hu %p skb %p", hu, skb);
> 
> +	mutex_lock(&intel_device_list_lock);
> +	list_for_each(p, &intel_device_list) {
> +		struct intel_device *idev = list_entry(p, struct intel_device,
> +						      list);
> +
> +		if (hu->tty->dev->parent == idev->pdev->dev.parent) {
> +			pm_runtime_get_sync(&idev->pdev->dev);

just for my own clarification. Why this is get_sync and the other just get?

> +			pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(&idev->pdev->dev);
> +			pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(&idev->pdev->dev);
> +			break;
> +		}
> +	}
> +	mutex_unlock(&intel_device_list_lock);
> +
> 	skb_queue_tail(&intel->txq, skb);
> 
> 	return 0;
> @@ -1071,6 +1127,10 @@ static irqreturn_t intel_irq(int irq, void *dev_id)
> 		intel_lpm_host_wake(idev->hu);
> 	mutex_unlock(&idev->hu_lock);
> 
> +	pm_runtime_get(&idev->pdev->dev);
> +	pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(&idev->pdev->dev);
> +	pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(&idev->pdev->dev);
> +
> 	return IRQ_HANDLED;
> }
> 
> @@ -1128,8 +1188,41 @@ static int intel_resume(struct device *dev)
> }
> #endif
> 
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM
> +static int intel_rt_suspend(struct device *dev)
> +{
> +	struct intel_device *idev = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> +	int err = 0;
> +
> +	dev_dbg(dev, "intel_suspend");
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&idev->hu_lock);
> +	if (idev->hu)
> +		err = intel_lpm_suspend(idev->hu);
> +	mutex_unlock(&idev->hu_lock);
> +
> +	return err;
> +}
> +
> +static int intel_rt_resume(struct device *dev)
> +{
> +	struct intel_device *idev = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> +	int err = 0;
> +
> +	dev_dbg(dev, "intel_resume");
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&idev->hu_lock);
> +	if (idev->hu)
> +		err = intel_lpm_resume(idev->hu);
> +	mutex_unlock(&idev->hu_lock);
> +
> +	return err;
> +}
> +#endif

Aren't these exactly the same? Why are we differentiating them.

> +
> static const struct dev_pm_ops intel_pm_ops = {
> 	SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(intel_suspend, intel_resume)
> +	SET_RUNTIME_PM_OPS(intel_rt_suspend, intel_rt_resume, NULL)
> };
> 
> static int intel_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)

Regards

Marcel


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 3/3] Bluetooth: hci_intel: Add runtime PM support
  2015-09-01 15:09   ` Marcel Holtmann
@ 2015-09-01 15:32     ` Loic Poulain
  2015-09-01 15:37       ` Marcel Holtmann
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Loic Poulain @ 2015-09-01 15:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Marcel Holtmann; +Cc: linux-bluetooth

Hi Marcel,

Thanks for the review.

>> static int intel_recv_lpm(struct hci_dev *hdev, struct sk_buff *skb)
>> @@ -895,9 +936,24 @@ static int intel_recv(struct hci_uart *hu, const void *data, int count)
>> static int intel_enqueue(struct hci_uart *hu, struct sk_buff *skb)
>> {
>> 	struct intel_data *intel = hu->priv;
>> +	struct list_head *p;
>>
>> 	BT_DBG("hu %p skb %p", hu, skb);
>>
>> +	mutex_lock(&intel_device_list_lock);
>> +	list_for_each(p, &intel_device_list) {
>> +		struct intel_device *idev = list_entry(p, struct intel_device,
>> +						      list);
>> +
>> +		if (hu->tty->dev->parent == idev->pdev->dev.parent) {
>> +			pm_runtime_get_sync(&idev->pdev->dev);
>
> just for my own clarification. Why this is get_sync and the other just get?
>

I want to be sure resume is completed before enqueuing any packet in 
order to be able to send the packet in dequeue.
Moreover, since LPM and 'standard' packets share the same queue, we 
don't want to enqueue a 'standard' packet before our LPM one.

In the threaded IRQ , we are actually already LPM resumed since we have
send a LPM resume ack to the controller, I just use get and put to 
notify the resume to the PM core and trigger autosuspend.

In the busy work, we don't need to be synced since we are already in a
async work. It is more a keep alive to delay the autosuspend.

Regards,
Loic
-- 
Intel Open Source Technology Center
http://oss.intel.com/

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 3/3] Bluetooth: hci_intel: Add runtime PM support
  2015-09-01 15:32     ` Loic Poulain
@ 2015-09-01 15:37       ` Marcel Holtmann
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Marcel Holtmann @ 2015-09-01 15:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Loic Poulain; +Cc: linux-bluetooth

Hi Loic,

>>> static int intel_recv_lpm(struct hci_dev *hdev, struct sk_buff *skb)
>>> @@ -895,9 +936,24 @@ static int intel_recv(struct hci_uart *hu, const void *data, int count)
>>> static int intel_enqueue(struct hci_uart *hu, struct sk_buff *skb)
>>> {
>>> 	struct intel_data *intel = hu->priv;
>>> +	struct list_head *p;
>>> 
>>> 	BT_DBG("hu %p skb %p", hu, skb);
>>> 
>>> +	mutex_lock(&intel_device_list_lock);
>>> +	list_for_each(p, &intel_device_list) {
>>> +		struct intel_device *idev = list_entry(p, struct intel_device,
>>> +						      list);
>>> +
>>> +		if (hu->tty->dev->parent == idev->pdev->dev.parent) {
>>> +			pm_runtime_get_sync(&idev->pdev->dev);
>> 
>> just for my own clarification. Why this is get_sync and the other just get?
>> 
> 
> I want to be sure resume is completed before enqueuing any packet in order to be able to send the packet in dequeue.
> Moreover, since LPM and 'standard' packets share the same queue, we don't want to enqueue a 'standard' packet before our LPM one.
> 
> In the threaded IRQ , we are actually already LPM resumed since we have
> send a LPM resume ack to the controller, I just use get and put to notify the resume to the PM core and trigger autosuspend.
> 
> In the busy work, we don't need to be synced since we are already in a
> async work. It is more a keep alive to delay the auto suspend.

then please add some comment in front of the commands to make clear why we are doing it. When it comes to this level of details, comments help a lot.

Regards

Marcel


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2015-09-01 15:37 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-09-01 14:42 [PATCH 1/3] Bluetooth: hci_intel: Implement LPM suspend/resume Loic Poulain
2015-09-01 14:42 ` [PATCH 2/3] Bluetooth: hci_intel: Add PM support Loic Poulain
2015-09-01 15:05   ` Marcel Holtmann
2015-09-01 14:42 ` [PATCH 3/3] Bluetooth: hci_intel: Add runtime " Loic Poulain
2015-09-01 15:09   ` Marcel Holtmann
2015-09-01 15:32     ` Loic Poulain
2015-09-01 15:37       ` Marcel Holtmann
2015-09-01 15:00 ` [PATCH 1/3] Bluetooth: hci_intel: Implement LPM suspend/resume Marcel Holtmann

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.