[meta-gnome][dizzy][PATCH] Use GFDL-1.1 instead of GFDLv1.1

[meta-gnome][dizzy][PATCH] Use GFDL-1.1 instead of GFDLv1.1

[Ulf Samuelsson]

The name for the GNU Free Documentation License is GFDL-1.1, 
not GFDLv1.1 as used in the "gnome-panel" recipes.

[PATCH] Use GFDL-1.1 instead of GFDLv1.1

[Ulf Samuelsson]

Signed-off-by: Ulf Samuelsson <ulf@emagii.com>
---
 meta-gnome/recipes-gnome/gnome-panel/gnome-panel3_3.0.2.bb | 2 +-
 meta-gnome/recipes-gnome/gnome-panel/gnome-panel_2.32.1.bb | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/meta-gnome/recipes-gnome/gnome-panel/gnome-panel3_3.0.2.bb b/meta-gnome/recipes-gnome/gnome-panel/gnome-panel3_3.0.2.bb
index 972a4d4..fbcf76f 100644
--- a/meta-gnome/recipes-gnome/gnome-panel/gnome-panel3_3.0.2.bb
+++ b/meta-gnome/recipes-gnome/gnome-panel/gnome-panel3_3.0.2.bb
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 SUMMARY = "GNOME panel"
-LICENSE = "GPLv2 & LGPLv2 & GFDLv1.1"
+LICENSE = "GPLv2 & LGPLv2 & GFDL-1.1"
 
 BPN = "gnome-panel"
 PR = "r1"
diff --git a/meta-gnome/recipes-gnome/gnome-panel/gnome-panel_2.32.1.bb b/meta-gnome/recipes-gnome/gnome-panel/gnome-panel_2.32.1.bb
index 4957a99..30c42c9 100644
--- a/meta-gnome/recipes-gnome/gnome-panel/gnome-panel_2.32.1.bb
+++ b/meta-gnome/recipes-gnome/gnome-panel/gnome-panel_2.32.1.bb
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 SUMMARY = "GNOME panel"
-LICENSE = "GPLv2 & LGPLv2 & GFDLv1.1"
+LICENSE = "GPLv2 & LGPLv2 & GFDL-1.1"
 
 LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://COPYING;md5=b234ee4d69f5fce4486a80fdaf4a4263 \
                     file://COPYING-DOCS;md5=c9211dab3ae61e580f48432020784324 \
-- 
1.9.1

[PATCH] Use GFDL-1.1 instead of GFDLv1.1

[Ulf Samuelsson]

Signed-off-by: Ulf Samuelsson <ulf@emagii.com>
---
 meta-gnome/recipes-gnome/gnome-panel/gnome-panel3_3.0.2.bb | 2 +-
 meta-gnome/recipes-gnome/gnome-panel/gnome-panel_2.32.1.bb | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/meta-gnome/recipes-gnome/gnome-panel/gnome-panel3_3.0.2.bb b/meta-gnome/recipes-gnome/gnome-panel/gnome-panel3_3.0.2.bb
index 972a4d4..fbcf76f 100644
--- a/meta-gnome/recipes-gnome/gnome-panel/gnome-panel3_3.0.2.bb
+++ b/meta-gnome/recipes-gnome/gnome-panel/gnome-panel3_3.0.2.bb
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 SUMMARY = "GNOME panel"
-LICENSE = "GPLv2 & LGPLv2 & GFDLv1.1"
+LICENSE = "GPLv2 & LGPLv2 & GFDL-1.1"
 
 BPN = "gnome-panel"
 PR = "r1"
diff --git a/meta-gnome/recipes-gnome/gnome-panel/gnome-panel_2.32.1.bb b/meta-gnome/recipes-gnome/gnome-panel/gnome-panel_2.32.1.bb
index 4957a99..30c42c9 100644
--- a/meta-gnome/recipes-gnome/gnome-panel/gnome-panel_2.32.1.bb
+++ b/meta-gnome/recipes-gnome/gnome-panel/gnome-panel_2.32.1.bb
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 SUMMARY = "GNOME panel"
-LICENSE = "GPLv2 & LGPLv2 & GFDLv1.1"
+LICENSE = "GPLv2 & LGPLv2 & GFDL-1.1"
 
 LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://COPYING;md5=b234ee4d69f5fce4486a80fdaf4a4263 \
                     file://COPYING-DOCS;md5=c9211dab3ae61e580f48432020784324 \
-- 
1.9.1

Re: [PATCH] Use GFDL-1.1 instead of GFDLv1.1

[Khem Raj]

On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 1:26 AM, Ulf Samuelsson <ulf@emagii.com> wrote:
> -LICENSE = "GPLv2 & LGPLv2 & GFDLv1.1"
> +LICENSE = "GPLv2 & LGPLv2 & GFDL-1.1"

IIRC both are correct

Re: [PATCH] Use GFDL-1.1 instead of GFDLv1.1

[Paul Eggleton]

On Wednesday 30 September 2015 03:10:56 Khem Raj wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 1:26 AM, Ulf Samuelsson <ulf@emagii.com> wrote:
> > -LICENSE = "GPLv2 & LGPLv2 & GFDLv1.1"
> > +LICENSE = "GPLv2 & LGPLv2 & GFDL-1.1"
> 
> IIRC both are correct

I don't think we have an SPDXLICENSEMAP entry for this though, so it won't be 
being mapped (unlike GPLv2 -> GPL-2.0).

Cheers,
Paul

-- 

Paul Eggleton
Intel Open Source Technology Centre

Re: [PATCH] Use GFDL-1.1 instead of GFDLv1.1

[Ulf Samuelsson]

There is no GFDLv1.1 file in the license directory
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
openembedded-core/meta/files/common-licenses$ ls GFDL*

GFDL-1.1  GFDL-1.2  GFDL-1.3
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

It does not make sense to have a duplicate file.

Incidently, the GFDL-1.1 file contains the GFDL-1.2 license, not the 1.1 
license.

/Ulf

Den 2015-09-30 kl. 13:05, skrev Paul Eggleton:
> On Wednesday 30 September 2015 03:10:56 Khem Raj wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 1:26 AM, Ulf Samuelsson <ulf@emagii.com> wrote:
>>> -LICENSE = "GPLv2 & LGPLv2 & GFDLv1.1"
>>> +LICENSE = "GPLv2 & LGPLv2 & GFDL-1.1"
>> IIRC both are correct
> I don't think we have an SPDXLICENSEMAP entry for this though, so it won't be
> being mapped (unlike GPLv2 -> GPL-2.0).
>
> Cheers,
> Paul
>

Re: [PATCH] Use GFDL-1.1 instead of GFDLv1.1

[Paul Eggleton]

Yes I'm aware of that. What I was pointing out is that usually we have an 
SPDXLICENSEMAP setting to map e.g. GPLv2 -> GPL-2.0; there is no such mapping 
for GFDL; I guess the assumption was that there was.

Cheers,
Paul

On Wednesday 30 September 2015 13:53:08 Ulf Samuelsson wrote:
> There is no GFDLv1.1 file in the license directory
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ------ openembedded-core/meta/files/common-licenses$ ls GFDL*
> 
> GFDL-1.1  GFDL-1.2  GFDL-1.3
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ------
> 
> It does not make sense to have a duplicate file.
> 
> Incidently, the GFDL-1.1 file contains the GFDL-1.2 license, not the 1.1
> license.
> 
> /Ulf
> 
> Den 2015-09-30 kl. 13:05, skrev Paul Eggleton:
> > On Wednesday 30 September 2015 03:10:56 Khem Raj wrote:
> >> On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 1:26 AM, Ulf Samuelsson <ulf@emagii.com> wrote:
> >>> -LICENSE = "GPLv2 & LGPLv2 & GFDLv1.1"
> >>> +LICENSE = "GPLv2 & LGPLv2 & GFDL-1.1"
> >> 
> >> IIRC both are correct
> > 
> > I don't think we have an SPDXLICENSEMAP entry for this though, so it won't
> > be being mapped (unlike GPLv2 -> GPL-2.0).
> > 
> > Cheers,
> > Paul

-- 

Paul Eggleton
Intel Open Source Technology Centre

Re: [PATCH] Use GFDL-1.1 instead of GFDLv1.1

[Khem Raj]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 526 bytes --]


> On Sep 30, 2015, at 4:05 AM, Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> 
> On Wednesday 30 September 2015 03:10:56 Khem Raj wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 1:26 AM, Ulf Samuelsson <ulf@emagii.com> wrote:
>>> -LICENSE = "GPLv2 & LGPLv2 & GFDLv1.1"
>>> +LICENSE = "GPLv2 & LGPLv2 & GFDL-1.1"
>> 
>> IIRC both are correct
> 
> I don't think we have an SPDXLICENSEMAP entry for this though, so it won't be
> being mapped (unlike GPLv2 -> GPL-2.0).

Ideal would be to have this entry for consistency

[-- Attachment #2: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 211 bytes --]

Re: [PATCH] Use GFDL-1.1 instead of GFDLv1.1

[Ulf Samuelsson]

Right now, it gives a warning during build.
Just because some think we should support both, it does not mean we have to *use* both.
Applying the patch should fix the warning message, which should be priority one.


Best Regards
Ulf Samuelsson

> 30 sep 2015 kl. 13:58 skrev Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>:
> 
> Yes I'm aware of that. What I was pointing out is that usually we have an 
> SPDXLICENSEMAP setting to map e.g. GPLv2 -> GPL-2.0; there is no such mapping 
> for GFDL; I guess the assumption was that there was.
> 
> Cheers,
> Paul
> 
>> On Wednesday 30 September 2015 13:53:08 Ulf Samuelsson wrote:
>> There is no GFDLv1.1 file in the license directory
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> ------ openembedded-core/meta/files/common-licenses$ ls GFDL*
>> 
>> GFDL-1.1  GFDL-1.2  GFDL-1.3
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> ------
>> 
>> It does not make sense to have a duplicate file.
>> 
>> Incidently, the GFDL-1.1 file contains the GFDL-1.2 license, not the 1.1
>> license.
>> 
>> /Ulf
>> 
>>> Den 2015-09-30 kl. 13:05, skrev Paul Eggleton:
>>>> On Wednesday 30 September 2015 03:10:56 Khem Raj wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 1:26 AM, Ulf Samuelsson <ulf@emagii.com> wrote:
>>>>> -LICENSE = "GPLv2 & LGPLv2 & GFDLv1.1"
>>>>> +LICENSE = "GPLv2 & LGPLv2 & GFDL-1.1"
>>>> 
>>>> IIRC both are correct
>>> 
>>> I don't think we have an SPDXLICENSEMAP entry for this though, so it won't
>>> be being mapped (unlike GPLv2 -> GPL-2.0).
>>> 
>>> Cheers,
>>> Paul
> 
> -- 
> 
> Paul Eggleton
> Intel Open Source Technology Centre

Re: [PATCH] Use GFDL-1.1 instead of GFDLv1.1

[Paul Eggleton]

Perhaps it wasn't clear, I was agreeing with you ;) I'm not even sure we need 
to add a mapping for this.

Cheers,
Paul

On Thursday 01 October 2015 00:08:00 Ulf Samuelsson wrote:
> Right now, it gives a warning during build.
> Just because some think we should support both, it does not mean we have to
> *use* both. Applying the patch should fix the warning message, which should
> be priority one.
> 
> 
> Best Regards
> Ulf Samuelsson
> 
> > 30 sep 2015 kl. 13:58 skrev Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>:
> > 
> > Yes I'm aware of that. What I was pointing out is that usually we have an
> > SPDXLICENSEMAP setting to map e.g. GPLv2 -> GPL-2.0; there is no such
> > mapping for GFDL; I guess the assumption was that there was.
> > 
> > Cheers,
> > Paul
> > 
> >> On Wednesday 30 September 2015 13:53:08 Ulf Samuelsson wrote:
> >> There is no GFDLv1.1 file in the license directory
> >> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> --- ------ openembedded-core/meta/files/common-licenses$ ls GFDL*
> >> 
> >> GFDL-1.1  GFDL-1.2  GFDL-1.3
> >> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> --- ------
> >> 
> >> It does not make sense to have a duplicate file.
> >> 
> >> Incidently, the GFDL-1.1 file contains the GFDL-1.2 license, not the 1.1
> >> license.
> >> 
> >> /Ulf
> >> 
> >>> Den 2015-09-30 kl. 13:05, skrev Paul Eggleton:
> >>>> On Wednesday 30 September 2015 03:10:56 Khem Raj wrote:
> >>>>> On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 1:26 AM, Ulf Samuelsson <ulf@emagii.com>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>> -LICENSE = "GPLv2 & LGPLv2 & GFDLv1.1"
> >>>>> +LICENSE = "GPLv2 & LGPLv2 & GFDL-1.1"
> >>>> 
> >>>> IIRC both are correct
> >>> 
> >>> I don't think we have an SPDXLICENSEMAP entry for this though, so it
> >>> won't
> >>> be being mapped (unlike GPLv2 -> GPL-2.0).
> >>> 
> >>> Cheers,
> >>> Paul

-- 

Paul Eggleton
Intel Open Source Technology Centre

Re: [PATCH] Use GFDL-1.1 instead of GFDLv1.1

[Martin Jansa]

We only need better commit message which starts with "gnome-panel*:"

On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 8:54 AM, Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com
> wrote:

> Perhaps it wasn't clear, I was agreeing with you ;) I'm not even sure we
> need
> to add a mapping for this.
>
> Cheers,
> Paul
>
> On Thursday 01 October 2015 00:08:00 Ulf Samuelsson wrote:
> > Right now, it gives a warning during build.
> > Just because some think we should support both, it does not mean we have
> to
> > *use* both. Applying the patch should fix the warning message, which
> should
> > be priority one.
> >
> >
> > Best Regards
> > Ulf Samuelsson
> >
> > > 30 sep 2015 kl. 13:58 skrev Paul Eggleton <
> paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>:
> > >
> > > Yes I'm aware of that. What I was pointing out is that usually we have
> an
> > > SPDXLICENSEMAP setting to map e.g. GPLv2 -> GPL-2.0; there is no such
> > > mapping for GFDL; I guess the assumption was that there was.
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Paul
> > >
> > >> On Wednesday 30 September 2015 13:53:08 Ulf Samuelsson wrote:
> > >> There is no GFDLv1.1 file in the license directory
> > >>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >> --- ------ openembedded-core/meta/files/common-licenses$ ls GFDL*
> > >>
> > >> GFDL-1.1  GFDL-1.2  GFDL-1.3
> > >>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >> --- ------
> > >>
> > >> It does not make sense to have a duplicate file.
> > >>
> > >> Incidently, the GFDL-1.1 file contains the GFDL-1.2 license, not the
> 1.1
> > >> license.
> > >>
> > >> /Ulf
> > >>
> > >>> Den 2015-09-30 kl. 13:05, skrev Paul Eggleton:
> > >>>> On Wednesday 30 September 2015 03:10:56 Khem Raj wrote:
> > >>>>> On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 1:26 AM, Ulf Samuelsson <ulf@emagii.com>
> > >>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>> -LICENSE = "GPLv2 & LGPLv2 & GFDLv1.1"
> > >>>>> +LICENSE = "GPLv2 & LGPLv2 & GFDL-1.1"
> > >>>>
> > >>>> IIRC both are correct
> > >>>
> > >>> I don't think we have an SPDXLICENSEMAP entry for this though, so it
> > >>> won't
> > >>> be being mapped (unlike GPLv2 -> GPL-2.0).
> > >>>
> > >>> Cheers,
> > >>> Paul
>
> --
>
> Paul Eggleton
> Intel Open Source Technology Centre
> --
> _______________________________________________
> Openembedded-devel mailing list
> Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
> http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel
>

[PATCH] Use GFDL-1.1 instead of GFDLv1.1

[Ulf Samuelsson]

Signed-off-by: Ulf Samuelsson <ulf@emagii.com>
---
 meta-gnome/recipes-gnome/gnome-panel/gnome-panel3_3.0.2.bb | 2 +-
 meta-gnome/recipes-gnome/gnome-panel/gnome-panel_2.32.1.bb | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/meta-gnome/recipes-gnome/gnome-panel/gnome-panel3_3.0.2.bb b/meta-gnome/recipes-gnome/gnome-panel/gnome-panel3_3.0.2.bb
index 972a4d4..fbcf76f 100644
--- a/meta-gnome/recipes-gnome/gnome-panel/gnome-panel3_3.0.2.bb
+++ b/meta-gnome/recipes-gnome/gnome-panel/gnome-panel3_3.0.2.bb
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 SUMMARY = "GNOME panel"
-LICENSE = "GPLv2 & LGPLv2 & GFDLv1.1"
+LICENSE = "GPLv2 & LGPLv2 & GFDL-1.1"
 
 BPN = "gnome-panel"
 PR = "r1"
diff --git a/meta-gnome/recipes-gnome/gnome-panel/gnome-panel_2.32.1.bb b/meta-gnome/recipes-gnome/gnome-panel/gnome-panel_2.32.1.bb
index 4957a99..30c42c9 100644
--- a/meta-gnome/recipes-gnome/gnome-panel/gnome-panel_2.32.1.bb
+++ b/meta-gnome/recipes-gnome/gnome-panel/gnome-panel_2.32.1.bb
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 SUMMARY = "GNOME panel"
-LICENSE = "GPLv2 & LGPLv2 & GFDLv1.1"
+LICENSE = "GPLv2 & LGPLv2 & GFDL-1.1"
 
 LIC_FILES_CHKSUM = "file://COPYING;md5=b234ee4d69f5fce4486a80fdaf4a4263 \
                     file://COPYING-DOCS;md5=c9211dab3ae61e580f48432020784324 \
-- 
1.9.1