[PATCH v2] perf: Fix build break on powerpc due to sample_reg_masks

[PATCH v2] perf: Fix build break on powerpc due to sample_reg_masks

[Sukadev Bhattiprolu]

>From e29aeeee7236122c4d807ec9ebc721b5d7d75c8d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 17:53:49 -0400
Subject: [PATCH v2] perf: Fix build break on powerpc due to sample_reg_masks

perf_regs.c does not get built on Powerpc as CONFIG_PERF_REGS is false.
So the weak definition for 'sample_regs_masks' doesn't get picked up.

Adding perf_regs.o to util/Build unconditionally, exposes a redefinition
error for 'perf_reg_value()' function (due to the static inline version
in util/perf_regs.h). So use #ifdef HAVE_PERF_REGS_SUPPORT' around that
function.

Signed-off-by: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
Changelog[v2]
	- [Jiri Olsa] include <linux/compiler.h> for __maybe_unused
---
 tools/perf/util/Build       | 2 +-
 tools/perf/util/perf_regs.c | 2 ++
 tools/perf/util/perf_regs.h | 1 +
 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tools/perf/util/Build b/tools/perf/util/Build
index 4bc7a9a..9217119 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/Build
+++ b/tools/perf/util/Build
@@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ libperf-y += levenshtein.o
 libperf-y += llvm-utils.o
 libperf-y += parse-options.o
 libperf-y += parse-events.o
+libperf-y += perf_regs.o
 libperf-y += path.o
 libperf-y += rbtree.o
 libperf-y += bitmap.o
@@ -104,7 +105,6 @@ libperf-$(CONFIG_LIBBABELTRACE) += data-convert-bt.o
 
 libperf-y += scripting-engines/
 
-libperf-$(CONFIG_PERF_REGS) += perf_regs.o
 libperf-$(CONFIG_ZLIB) += zlib.o
 libperf-$(CONFIG_LZMA) += lzma.o
 
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/perf_regs.c b/tools/perf/util/perf_regs.c
index 885e8ac..6b8eb13 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/perf_regs.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/perf_regs.c
@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ const struct sample_reg __weak sample_reg_masks[] = {
 	SMPL_REG_END
 };
 
+#ifdef HAVE_PERF_REGS_SUPPORT
 int perf_reg_value(u64 *valp, struct regs_dump *regs, int id)
 {
 	int i, idx = 0;
@@ -29,3 +30,4 @@ out:
 	*valp = regs->cache_regs[id];
 	return 0;
 }
+#endif
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/perf_regs.h b/tools/perf/util/perf_regs.h
index 2984dcc..679d6e4 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/perf_regs.h
+++ b/tools/perf/util/perf_regs.h
@@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
 #define __PERF_REGS_H
 
 #include <linux/types.h>
+#include <linux/compiler.h>
 
 struct regs_dump;
 
-- 
1.8.3.1

Re: [PATCH v2] perf: Fix build break on powerpc due to sample_reg_masks

[Jiri Olsa]

On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 11:28:36AM -0700, Sukadev Bhattiprolu wrote:
> From e29aeeee7236122c4d807ec9ebc721b5d7d75c8d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 17:53:49 -0400
> Subject: [PATCH v2] perf: Fix build break on powerpc due to sample_reg_masks
> 
> perf_regs.c does not get built on Powerpc as CONFIG_PERF_REGS is false.
> So the weak definition for 'sample_regs_masks' doesn't get picked up.
> 
> Adding perf_regs.o to util/Build unconditionally, exposes a redefinition
> error for 'perf_reg_value()' function (due to the static inline version
> in util/perf_regs.h). So use #ifdef HAVE_PERF_REGS_SUPPORT' around that
> function.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>

thanks,
jirka

Re: [PATCH v2] perf: Fix build break on powerpc due to sample_reg_masks

[Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo]

Em Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 09:09:09PM +0200, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 11:28:36AM -0700, Sukadev Bhattiprolu wrote:
> > From e29aeeee7236122c4d807ec9ebc721b5d7d75c8d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 17:53:49 -0400
> > Subject: [PATCH v2] perf: Fix build break on powerpc due to sample_reg_masks
> > 
> > perf_regs.c does not get built on Powerpc as CONFIG_PERF_REGS is false.
> > So the weak definition for 'sample_regs_masks' doesn't get picked up.
> > 
> > Adding perf_regs.o to util/Build unconditionally, exposes a redefinition
> > error for 'perf_reg_value()' function (due to the static inline version
> > in util/perf_regs.h). So use #ifdef HAVE_PERF_REGS_SUPPORT' around that
> > function.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> 
> Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>

Thanks, applied.

- Arnaldo

[tip:perf/core] perf tools: Fix build break on powerpc due to sample_reg_masks

[tip-bot for Sukadev Bhattiprolu]

Commit-ID:  eb56db54326f910348defbee2803ec0675a664b2
Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/tip/eb56db54326f910348defbee2803ec0675a664b2
Author:     Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
AuthorDate: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 17:53:49 -0400
Committer:  Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
CommitDate: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 18:34:27 -0300

perf tools: Fix build break on powerpc due to sample_reg_masks

The perf_regs.c file does not get built on Powerpc as CONFIG_PERF_REGS
is false.  So the weak definition for 'sample_regs_masks' doesn't get
picked up.

Adding perf_regs.o to util/Build unconditionally, exposes a redefinition
error for 'perf_reg_value()' function (due to the static inline version
in util/perf_regs.h). So use #ifdef HAVE_PERF_REGS_SUPPORT' around that
function.

Signed-off-by: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Dominik Dingel <dingel@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150930182836.GA27858@us.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
---
 tools/perf/util/Build       | 2 +-
 tools/perf/util/perf_regs.c | 2 ++
 tools/perf/util/perf_regs.h | 1 +
 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tools/perf/util/Build b/tools/perf/util/Build
index 4bc7a9a..9217119 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/Build
+++ b/tools/perf/util/Build
@@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ libperf-y += levenshtein.o
 libperf-y += llvm-utils.o
 libperf-y += parse-options.o
 libperf-y += parse-events.o
+libperf-y += perf_regs.o
 libperf-y += path.o
 libperf-y += rbtree.o
 libperf-y += bitmap.o
@@ -104,7 +105,6 @@ libperf-$(CONFIG_LIBBABELTRACE) += data-convert-bt.o
 
 libperf-y += scripting-engines/
 
-libperf-$(CONFIG_PERF_REGS) += perf_regs.o
 libperf-$(CONFIG_ZLIB) += zlib.o
 libperf-$(CONFIG_LZMA) += lzma.o
 
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/perf_regs.c b/tools/perf/util/perf_regs.c
index 885e8ac..6b8eb13 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/perf_regs.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/perf_regs.c
@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ const struct sample_reg __weak sample_reg_masks[] = {
 	SMPL_REG_END
 };
 
+#ifdef HAVE_PERF_REGS_SUPPORT
 int perf_reg_value(u64 *valp, struct regs_dump *regs, int id)
 {
 	int i, idx = 0;
@@ -29,3 +30,4 @@ out:
 	*valp = regs->cache_regs[id];
 	return 0;
 }
+#endif
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/perf_regs.h b/tools/perf/util/perf_regs.h
index 2984dcc..679d6e4 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/perf_regs.h
+++ b/tools/perf/util/perf_regs.h
@@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
 #define __PERF_REGS_H
 
 #include <linux/types.h>
+#include <linux/compiler.h>
 
 struct regs_dump;
 

Re: [PATCH v2] perf: Fix build break on powerpc due to sample_reg_masks

[Michael Ellerman]

On Wed, 2015-09-30 at 16:45 -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 09:09:09PM +0200, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> > On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 11:28:36AM -0700, Sukadev Bhattiprolu wrote:
> > > From e29aeeee7236122c4d807ec9ebc721b5d7d75c8d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > > From: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > > Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 17:53:49 -0400
> > > Subject: [PATCH v2] perf: Fix build break on powerpc due to sample_reg_masks
> > > 
> > > perf_regs.c does not get built on Powerpc as CONFIG_PERF_REGS is false.
> > > So the weak definition for 'sample_regs_masks' doesn't get picked up.
> > > 
> > > Adding perf_regs.o to util/Build unconditionally, exposes a redefinition
> > > error for 'perf_reg_value()' function (due to the static inline version
> > > in util/perf_regs.h). So use #ifdef HAVE_PERF_REGS_SUPPORT' around that
> > > function.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > 
> > Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
> 
> Thanks, applied.

Is this going to Linus' tree any time soon?

I have folks pinging me to say that perf is broken on powerpc.

cheers

Re: [PATCH v2] perf: Fix build break on powerpc due to sample_reg_masks

[Michael Ellerman]

On Wed, 2015-09-30 at 16:45 -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 09:09:09PM +0200, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> > On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 11:28:36AM -0700, Sukadev Bhattiprolu wrote:
> > > From e29aeeee7236122c4d807ec9ebc721b5d7d75c8d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > > From: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > > Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 17:53:49 -0400
> > > Subject: [PATCH v2] perf: Fix build break on powerpc due to sample_reg_masks
> > > 
> > > perf_regs.c does not get built on Powerpc as CONFIG_PERF_REGS is false.
> > > So the weak definition for 'sample_regs_masks' doesn't get picked up.
> > > 
> > > Adding perf_regs.o to util/Build unconditionally, exposes a redefinition
> > > error for 'perf_reg_value()' function (due to the static inline version
> > > in util/perf_regs.h). So use #ifdef HAVE_PERF_REGS_SUPPORT' around that
> > > function.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > 
> > Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
> 
> Thanks, applied.

Is this going to Linus' tree any time soon?

I have folks pinging me to say that perf is broken on powerpc.

cheers

Re: [PATCH v2] perf: Fix build break on powerpc due to sample_reg_masks

[Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo]

Em Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 11:46:38AM +1100, Michael Ellerman escreveu:
> On Wed, 2015-09-30 at 16:45 -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > Em Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 09:09:09PM +0200, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> > > On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 11:28:36AM -0700, Sukadev Bhattiprolu wrote:
> > > > From e29aeeee7236122c4d807ec9ebc721b5d7d75c8d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > > > From: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > > > Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 17:53:49 -0400
> > > > Subject: [PATCH v2] perf: Fix build break on powerpc due to sample_reg_masks
> > > > 
> > > > perf_regs.c does not get built on Powerpc as CONFIG_PERF_REGS is false.
> > > > So the weak definition for 'sample_regs_masks' doesn't get picked up.
> > > > 
> > > > Adding perf_regs.o to util/Build unconditionally, exposes a redefinition
> > > > error for 'perf_reg_value()' function (due to the static inline version
> > > > in util/perf_regs.h). So use #ifdef HAVE_PERF_REGS_SUPPORT' around that
> > > > function.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > > 
> > > Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
> > 
> > Thanks, applied.
> 
> Is this going to Linus' tree any time soon?
> 
> I have folks pinging me to say that perf is broken on powerpc.

Checking this now.

- Arnaldo

[tip:perf/urgent] perf tools: Fix build break on powerpc due to sample_reg_masks

[tip-bot for Sukadev Bhattiprolu]

Commit-ID:  9fb4765451f22c5e782c1590747717550bff34b2
Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/tip/9fb4765451f22c5e782c1590747717550bff34b2
Author:     Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
AuthorDate: Thu, 24 Sep 2015 17:53:49 -0400
Committer:  Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
CommitDate: Wed, 7 Oct 2015 10:20:08 -0300

perf tools: Fix build break on powerpc due to sample_reg_masks

perf_regs.c does not get built on Powerpc as CONFIG_PERF_REGS is false.
So the weak definition for 'sample_regs_masks' doesn't get picked up.

Adding perf_regs.o to util/Build unconditionally, exposes a redefinition
error for 'perf_reg_value()' function (due to the static inline version
in util/perf_regs.h). So use #ifdef HAVE_PERF_REGS_SUPPORT' around that
function.

Signed-off-by: Sukadev Bhattiprolu <sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150930182836.GA27858@us.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
---
 tools/perf/util/Build       | 2 +-
 tools/perf/util/perf_regs.c | 2 ++
 tools/perf/util/perf_regs.h | 1 +
 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tools/perf/util/Build b/tools/perf/util/Build
index 349bc96..e5f18a2 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/Build
+++ b/tools/perf/util/Build
@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ libperf-y += levenshtein.o
 libperf-y += llvm-utils.o
 libperf-y += parse-options.o
 libperf-y += parse-events.o
+libperf-y += perf_regs.o
 libperf-y += path.o
 libperf-y += rbtree.o
 libperf-y += bitmap.o
@@ -103,7 +104,6 @@ libperf-$(CONFIG_LIBBABELTRACE) += data-convert-bt.o
 
 libperf-y += scripting-engines/
 
-libperf-$(CONFIG_PERF_REGS) += perf_regs.o
 libperf-$(CONFIG_ZLIB) += zlib.o
 libperf-$(CONFIG_LZMA) += lzma.o
 
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/perf_regs.c b/tools/perf/util/perf_regs.c
index 885e8ac..6b8eb13 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/perf_regs.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/perf_regs.c
@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ const struct sample_reg __weak sample_reg_masks[] = {
 	SMPL_REG_END
 };
 
+#ifdef HAVE_PERF_REGS_SUPPORT
 int perf_reg_value(u64 *valp, struct regs_dump *regs, int id)
 {
 	int i, idx = 0;
@@ -29,3 +30,4 @@ out:
 	*valp = regs->cache_regs[id];
 	return 0;
 }
+#endif
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/perf_regs.h b/tools/perf/util/perf_regs.h
index 2984dcc..679d6e4 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/perf_regs.h
+++ b/tools/perf/util/perf_regs.h
@@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
 #define __PERF_REGS_H
 
 #include <linux/types.h>
+#include <linux/compiler.h>
 
 struct regs_dump;