All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
	Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@ezchip.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com>,
	Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>, Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
	Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>,
	"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: [PATCH] nohz: Revert "nohz: Set isolcpus when nohz_full is set"
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2015 17:21:23 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1444663283-30068-1-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com> (raw)

This reverts commit 8cb9764fc88b41db11f251e8b2a0d006578b7eb4.

We assumed that nohz full users always want scheduler isolation on full
dynticks CPUs, therefore we included nohz full CPUs on cpu_isolated_map.
This means that tasks run by default on CPUs outside the nohz_full range
unless their affinity is explicity overwritten.

This suits pure isolation workloads but when the machine is needed to
run common workloads, the available sets of CPUs to run common tasks
becomes reduced.

We reach an extreme case when CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL_ALL is enabled as it
leaves only CPU 0 for non-isolation tasks, which makes people think that
their supercomputer regressed to 90's UP.

Some nohz full users appear to be interested in running normal workloads
either before or after an isolation workload. Nohz full isn't optimized
toward normal workloads but it's still better than UP performance.

We are reaching a limitation in kernel presets here. Lets revert this
cpu_isolated_map inclusion and let userspace do its own scheduler
isolation using cpusets or explicit affinity settings.

Reported-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Reported-by: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com>
Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@ezchip.com>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
---
 kernel/sched/core.c | 3 ---
 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index 6159531..3c35b5f 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -7238,9 +7238,6 @@ void __init sched_init_smp(void)
 	alloc_cpumask_var(&non_isolated_cpus, GFP_KERNEL);
 	alloc_cpumask_var(&fallback_doms, GFP_KERNEL);
 
-	/* nohz_full won't take effect without isolating the cpus. */
-	tick_nohz_full_add_cpus_to(cpu_isolated_map);
-
 	sched_init_numa();
 
 	/*
-- 
2.5.3


             reply	other threads:[~2015-10-12 15:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-10-12 15:21 Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2015-10-12 15:32 ` [PATCH] nohz: Revert "nohz: Set isolcpus when nohz_full is set" Paul E. McKenney
2015-10-12 16:20   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2015-10-12 16:53     ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-10-12 16:55       ` Chris Metcalf
2015-10-12 17:42         ` Frederic Weisbecker
2015-10-12 17:45           ` Christoph Lameter
2015-10-12 17:50             ` Frederic Weisbecker
2015-10-12 17:52             ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-10-12 17:55               ` Frederic Weisbecker
2015-10-12 18:22                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-10-12 18:27                   ` Christoph Lameter
2015-10-12 18:03           ` Chris Metcalf
2015-10-12 19:52 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-10-20  9:31 ` [tip:sched/core] " tip-bot for Frederic Weisbecker

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1444663283-30068-1-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --to=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=adobriyan@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=cmetcalf@ezchip.com \
    --cc=davej@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.