From: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@ezchip.com>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com>,
Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>, Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nohz: Revert "nohz: Set isolcpus when nohz_full is set"
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2015 14:03:23 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <561BF5EB.8080006@ezchip.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151012174238.GA1113@lerouge>
On 10/12/2015 01:42 PM, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 12:55:24PM -0400, Chris Metcalf wrote:
>> >On 10/12/2015 12:53 PM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>> >
>> >Is it worth starting to think about grouping things under the
>> >"task isolation" model somehow? "task_isolation_cpus=1-31"
>> >or some such for this, and then that just sets up the nohz_full
>> >and isolcpus options under the hood?
> Yeah if I could do it again, I would have rather created something like
> cpu_isolation= (which name would conflict with isolcpus though)
Well, it only sort of conflicts. I think given that they would be clearly
documented they are different enough not to create too much
confusion. And cpu_isolation really does seem like a good name.
--
Chris Metcalf, EZChip Semiconductor
http://www.ezchip.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-12 18:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-12 15:21 [PATCH] nohz: Revert "nohz: Set isolcpus when nohz_full is set" Frederic Weisbecker
2015-10-12 15:32 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-10-12 16:20 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2015-10-12 16:53 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-10-12 16:55 ` Chris Metcalf
2015-10-12 17:42 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2015-10-12 17:45 ` Christoph Lameter
2015-10-12 17:50 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2015-10-12 17:52 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-10-12 17:55 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2015-10-12 18:22 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-10-12 18:27 ` Christoph Lameter
2015-10-12 18:03 ` Chris Metcalf [this message]
2015-10-12 19:52 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-10-20 9:31 ` [tip:sched/core] " tip-bot for Frederic Weisbecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=561BF5EB.8080006@ezchip.com \
--to=cmetcalf@ezchip.com \
--cc=adobriyan@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.