All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH v3] raisin: enable ovmf build for arm64
@ 2015-10-16 11:42 Stefano Stabellini
  2015-10-16 18:39 ` Julien Grall
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Stefano Stabellini @ 2015-10-16 11:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: stefano.stabellini; +Cc: xen-devel

nasm is not a dependency on arm64.
print out a message that on x86_32 we are building ovmf x86_64.

---

Changes in v3:
- allow x86_64 build on x86_32
- print out a message that on x86_32 we are building ovmf x86_64
- add a comment on the usage of large model on arm64

Changes in v2:
- disable x86_32 build (it doesn't work, but it wasn't explicitly
  disabled)
- remove export GCC48_AARCH64_PREFIX= as it is not necessary
- add a comment on why we are using -t GCC48
---
 components/ovmf |   55 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/components/ovmf b/components/ovmf
index ffdde19..c3fa75d 100644
--- a/components/ovmf
+++ b/components/ovmf
@@ -1,24 +1,35 @@
 #!/usr/bin/env bash
 
 function ovmf_skip() {
-    if [[ $RAISIN_ARCH != "x86_64" && $RAISIN_ARCH != "x86_32" ]]
-    then
-        return 0
-    else
-        return 1
-    fi
+    case $RAISIN_ARCH in
+        "x86_32" )
+            verbose_echo "Building OVMF for x86_64 guests"
+            return 1
+            ;;
+        "arm32" )
+            return 0
+            ;;
+        "arm64"|"x86_64" )
+            return 1
+            ;;
+    esac
 }
 
 function ovmf_check_package() {
-    local DEP_Debian_common="build-essential nasm uuid-dev python iasl"
-    local DEP_Debian_x86_32="$DEP_Debian_common"
-    local DEP_Debian_x86_64="$DEP_Debian_common"
-    local DEP_Debian_arm32="$DEP_Debian_common"
+    local DEP_Debian_common="build-essential uuid-dev python iasl"
+    local DEP_Debian_x86_32="$DEP_Debian_common nasm"
+    local DEP_Debian_x86_64="$DEP_Debian_x86_32"
     local DEP_Debian_arm64="$DEP_Debian_common"
 
-    local DEP_Fedora_common="make gcc gcc-c++ nasm libuuid-devel python acpica-tools"
-    local DEP_Fedora_x86_32="$DEP_Fedora_common"
-    local DEP_Fedora_x86_64="$DEP_Fedora_common"
+    local DEP_Fedora_common="make gcc gcc-c++ libuuid-devel python acpica-tools"
+    local DEP_Fedora_x86_32="$DEP_Fedora_common nasm"
+    local DEP_Fedora_x86_64="$DEP_Fedora_x86_32"
+    local DEP_Fedora_arm64="$DEP_Debian_common"
+
+    local DEP_CentOS_common="$DEP_Fedora_common"
+    local DEP_CentOS_x86_32="$DEP_Fedora_x86_32"
+    local DEP_CentOS_x86_64="$DEP_Fedora_x86_64"
+    local DEP_CentOS_arm64="$DEP_Fedora_arm64"
 
     verbose_echo Checking OVMF dependencies
     eval check-package \$DEP_"$DISTRO"_"$RAISIN_ARCH"
@@ -30,9 +41,21 @@ function ovmf_build() {
     git-checkout $OVMF_URL $OVMF_REVISION ovmf-dir
     cd ovmf-dir
 
-    make -C BaseTools/Source/C
-    OvmfPkg/build.sh -a X64 -b RELEASE -n 4
-    cp Build/OvmfX64/RELEASE_GCC*/FV/OVMF.fd ovmf.bin
+    make -C BaseTools
+
+    if [[ $RAISIN_ARCH = "arm64" ]]
+    then
+        # Just use gcc4.8 flags for now: we have to specify a gcc
+        # version and the 4.8 flags are almost identical to 4.9, etc.
+        # As a consequence we are always going to use the large model.
+        bash -c "source edksetup.sh && \
+                 build -a AARCH64 -t GCC48 -p ArmVirtPkg/ArmVirtXen.dsc -b RELEASE"
+        mkdir -p "$INST_DIR"/$PREFIX/lib/xen/boot
+        cp Build/ArmVirtXen-AARCH64/RELEASE_GCC*/FV/XEN_EFI.fd "$INST_DIR"/$PREFIX/lib/xen/boot/XEN_EFI.fd
+    else
+        OvmfPkg/build.sh -a X64 -b RELEASE -n 4
+        cp Build/OvmfX64/RELEASE_GCC*/FV/OVMF.fd ovmf.bin
+    fi
 
     cd "$BASEDIR"
 }
-- 
1.7.9.5

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v3] raisin: enable ovmf build for arm64
  2015-10-16 11:42 [PATCH v3] raisin: enable ovmf build for arm64 Stefano Stabellini
@ 2015-10-16 18:39 ` Julien Grall
  2015-10-19 15:18   ` Stefano Stabellini
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Julien Grall @ 2015-10-16 18:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stefano Stabellini; +Cc: xen-devel

On 16/10/15 12:42, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
>  function ovmf_check_package() {
> -    local DEP_Debian_common="build-essential nasm uuid-dev python iasl"
> -    local DEP_Debian_x86_32="$DEP_Debian_common"
> -    local DEP_Debian_x86_64="$DEP_Debian_common"
> -    local DEP_Debian_arm32="$DEP_Debian_common"
> +    local DEP_Debian_common="build-essential uuid-dev python iasl"
> +    local DEP_Debian_x86_32="$DEP_Debian_common nasm"
> +    local DEP_Debian_x86_64="$DEP_Debian_x86_32"
>      local DEP_Debian_arm64="$DEP_Debian_common"
>  
> -    local DEP_Fedora_common="make gcc gcc-c++ nasm libuuid-devel python acpica-tools"
> -    local DEP_Fedora_x86_32="$DEP_Fedora_common"
> -    local DEP_Fedora_x86_64="$DEP_Fedora_common"
> +    local DEP_Fedora_common="make gcc gcc-c++ libuuid-devel python acpica-tools"
> +    local DEP_Fedora_x86_32="$DEP_Fedora_common nasm"
> +    local DEP_Fedora_x86_64="$DEP_Fedora_x86_32"
> +    local DEP_Fedora_arm64="$DEP_Debian_common"

Shouldn't it be $DEP_Fedora_common here?

> +
> +    local DEP_CentOS_common="$DEP_Fedora_common"
> +    local DEP_CentOS_x86_32="$DEP_Fedora_x86_32"
> +    local DEP_CentOS_x86_64="$DEP_Fedora_x86_64"
> +    local DEP_CentOS_arm64="$DEP_Fedora_arm64"

It's bit strange to introduce DEP_CentOS_* in a patch which only enable
ARM64. Is it intentional?

Regards,

-- 
Julien Grall

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v3] raisin: enable ovmf build for arm64
  2015-10-16 18:39 ` Julien Grall
@ 2015-10-19 15:18   ` Stefano Stabellini
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Stefano Stabellini @ 2015-10-19 15:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Julien Grall; +Cc: xen-devel, Stefano Stabellini

On Fri, 16 Oct 2015, Julien Grall wrote:
> On 16/10/15 12:42, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> >  function ovmf_check_package() {
> > -    local DEP_Debian_common="build-essential nasm uuid-dev python iasl"
> > -    local DEP_Debian_x86_32="$DEP_Debian_common"
> > -    local DEP_Debian_x86_64="$DEP_Debian_common"
> > -    local DEP_Debian_arm32="$DEP_Debian_common"
> > +    local DEP_Debian_common="build-essential uuid-dev python iasl"
> > +    local DEP_Debian_x86_32="$DEP_Debian_common nasm"
> > +    local DEP_Debian_x86_64="$DEP_Debian_x86_32"
> >      local DEP_Debian_arm64="$DEP_Debian_common"
> >  
> > -    local DEP_Fedora_common="make gcc gcc-c++ nasm libuuid-devel python acpica-tools"
> > -    local DEP_Fedora_x86_32="$DEP_Fedora_common"
> > -    local DEP_Fedora_x86_64="$DEP_Fedora_common"
> > +    local DEP_Fedora_common="make gcc gcc-c++ libuuid-devel python acpica-tools"
> > +    local DEP_Fedora_x86_32="$DEP_Fedora_common nasm"
> > +    local DEP_Fedora_x86_64="$DEP_Fedora_x86_32"
> > +    local DEP_Fedora_arm64="$DEP_Debian_common"
> 
> Shouldn't it be $DEP_Fedora_common here?

Yes, it should!


> > +
> > +    local DEP_CentOS_common="$DEP_Fedora_common"
> > +    local DEP_CentOS_x86_32="$DEP_Fedora_x86_32"
> > +    local DEP_CentOS_x86_64="$DEP_Fedora_x86_64"
> > +    local DEP_CentOS_arm64="$DEP_Fedora_arm64"
> 
> It's bit strange to introduce DEP_CentOS_* in a patch which only enable
> ARM64. Is it intentional?

Yes, it is intentional: I tested it on CentOS. So far we have been
adding CentOS dependencies "on demand". I'll mention it in the commit
message.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2015-10-19 15:18 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-10-16 11:42 [PATCH v3] raisin: enable ovmf build for arm64 Stefano Stabellini
2015-10-16 18:39 ` Julien Grall
2015-10-19 15:18   ` Stefano Stabellini

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.